Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INDUSTRIAL REFRIGERATION CONSORTIUM RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY FORUM MAY 2-3, 2012
Overview
1 2 3 4
Basics of insulation & insulation systems Industry insulation recommendations Annual energy simulation Conclusions
INSULATION BASICS
Protect the underlying piping from corrosion by keeping the piping cold & dry (vapor retarder)
Heat Transfer
TS,1 k
d2 d1
TS,2
One-dimensional, steady-state, conduction heat transfer in cylindrical coordinates 2 ,1 ,2 = ln 2 1 is a property of the insulation chosen 2 = 1 + 2 is a heat rate, i.e. units of Btu/hr, tons, kWt
TS,2
is a property of the orientation, diameter, velocity, and temperatures 2 = 1 + 2 is a heat rate, i.e. units of Btu/hr, tons, kWt
= +
Design Analysis
Assumptions:
Ambient conditions: quiescent, 95F, outdoors Pipe at uniform temperature Insulation = 0.0195 Btu/hr-ft2-F Aluminum jacket (weathered) = 0.3
,2 ,1 1
Analysis
Observations
Used NAIMAs 3EPlus (v. 4) to verify the analysis with good agreement For the range of insulation thicknesses in our industry, an optimum insulation thickness doesnt occur
INDUSTRY RECOMMENDATIONS
Industry Recommendations
Outdoor horizontal piping
100F dry bulb, 90% relative humidity, wind velocity 7.5 mph, metal jacket
SIMULATION
Energy Analysis
Previous analysis was for design conditions, but what about the energy impact over the year? To estimate that, will need
Weather data, including wind & solar Model that accounts for the solar gain Refrigeration system efficiency
Weather Values
Data excerpt for Madison, WI TMY2 data
Month 1 1 1 1 1 1 Day 1 1 1 1 1 1 Hour 6 7 8 9 10 11 GHR Btu/hr-ft2 0.00 0.00 2.54 12.05 26.31 43.11 DB F 34.0 33.6 33.4 33.1 33.4 33.6 DP F 28.9 29.7 30.2 30.0 30.9 31.5 WS mph 13.87 13.20 12.30 11.63 10.74 10.07
Descriptions
GHR = Global Horizontal Radiation (solar), Btu/hr-ft2-F DB = Dry bulb temperature, deg F DP = Dewpoint temperature, deg F WS = Wind speed, mph
Model Description
Split insulation in half
Upper half is exposed to solar radiation Lower half is not Both halves get the same convection coefficient
Horizontal cylinder in cross-flow or natural convection depending on wind speed
Hourly calculation to determine the total load on the piping due to heat gain through insulation
Model
, ,
WS
,1 1
Failed Insulation Estimate Pipe Size [in] Insulation Thickness [in] 5 Annual Heat Annual Cost Gain [ton-hrs per 100 ft per 100 ft] 3,730 $670
Factor of 2 loss of insulation thermal conductivity on top, factor of 6 on the bottom
Failed Insulation Estimate Pipe Size [in] Insulation Thickness [in] 3 Annual Heat Annual Cost Gain [ton-hrs per 100 ft per 100 ft] 1,826 $120
Factor of 2 loss of insulation thermal conductivity on top, factor of 6 on the bottom
Failed Insulation Estimate Pipe Size [in] Insulation Thickness [in] 5 Annual Heat Annual Cost Gain [ton-hrs per 100 ft per 100 ft] 4,900 $880
Factor of 2 loss of insulation thermal conductivity on top, factor of 6 on the bottom
Failed Insulation Estimate Pipe Size [in] Insulation Thickness [in] 3 Annual Heat Annual Cost Gain [ton-hrs per 100 ft per 100 ft] 3,460 $230
Factor of 2 loss of insulation thermal conductivity on top, factor of 6 on the bottom
Conclusions
IF insulation system is properly maintained the parasitic load is relatively low Failed insulation systems NOT ONLY effect the heat load, BUT ALSO put the underlying piping at increased risk for corrosion
Resources
IIAR Ammonia Refrigeration Piping Handbook, Chapter 7 ASHRAE 2010 Refrigeration Handbook, Chapter 10 NAIMA 3EPlus (http://www.pipeinsulation.org/)
QUESTIONS?