Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
v
x1 = γ x1′ + x1′
(γ = γ ′ ) (2)
c
From (1)
x1′ v
= γ 1 −
x1 c
From (2)
x1′ 1
=
γ 1 +
x1 v
c
So
γ 1 − =
v 1
c γ 1+ v
c
or
1
γ=
1 − v2 c2
461
462 CHAPTER 14
14-2. We introduce cosh α ≅ y , sinh α ≅ y v c and substitute these expressions into Eqs.
(14.14); then
x1′ = x1 cosh α − ct sinh α
x1
t ′ = t cosh a − sinh α (1)
c
x2′ = x2 ; x3′ = x3
Now, if we use cosh α = cos (iα) and i sinh α = sin (iα), we can rewrite (1) as
x1′ = x1 cos ( iα ) + ict sin ( iα )
(2)
ict ′ = − x1 sin ( iα ) + ict cos ( iα )
Comparing these equations with the relation between the rotated system and the original
system in ordinary three-dimensional space,
x1′ = x1 cos θ + x2 sin θ
x2′ = − x1 sin θ + x2 cos θ (3)
x3′ = x3
x2′ x2
x1′
θ
x1
We can see that (2) corresponds to a rotation of the x1 − ict plane through the angle iα.
1 ∂ 2 ψ ( x , ict )
∇ 2ψ ( x , ict ) − =0 (1)
c2 ∂t 2
is Lorentz invariant, then in the transformed system we must have
1 ∂ 2 ψ ( x ′ , ict ′ )
∇ ′ 2ψ ( x ′ , ict ′ ) − =0 (2)
c2 ∂t ′ 2
where
∂2 ∂2 ∂2
∇′2 = + + (3)
∂x ′ 2
∂y ′ 2
∂z ′ 2
We can rewrite (2) as
4
∂ 2ψ ( x ′ , ict ′ )
∑ ∂x ′ 2 = 0 (4)
µ =1 µ
THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY 463
∂2 ∂2
Now, we first determine how the operator ∑ ∂x ′ 2 is related to the original operator ∑ ∂x 2 .
µ µ µ µ
We know the following relations:
xµ′ = ∑ λ µν xν (5)
ν
xν = ∑ λ µν xµ′ (6)
µ
Then,
∂ ∂ ∂xν ∂
=∑ = ∑ λ µν (8)
∂xµ′ ν ∂xν ∂xµ′ ν ∂xν
∂2 ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
= ∑ λ µν ∑ λ µλ = ∑∑ λ µν λ µλ (9)
∂xµ′2
ν ∂xν λ ∂x λ ν λ ∂xν ∂xλ
Therefore,
∂2 ∂ ∂
∑ ∂x ′ 2 = ∑∑∑ λµν λµλ ∂x ∂x
µ µ ν λ µ ν λ
∂ ∂
= ∑∑ δ νλ
ν λ ∂xν ∂xλ
∂2
=∑ (10)
∂xλ2
This equation means that the function ψ taken at the transformed point (x′,ict′) satisfies the
same equation as the original function ψ (x,ict) and therefore the equation is invariant. In a
Galilean transformation, the coordinates become
x ′ = x − vx t
y ′ = y − vy t
(12)
z ′ = z − vz t
t′ = t
Using these relations, we have
464 CHAPTER 14
∂ ∂ ∂x ∂ ∂ t ∂ 1 ∂
= + = −
∂ x ′ ∂x ∂ x ′ ∂t ∂ x ′ ∂x v x ∂ t
∂ ∂ 1 ∂
= −
∂ y ′ ∂y v y ∂t
(13)
∂ ∂ 1 ∂
= −
∂z ′ ∂y v z ∂t
∂ ∂
=
∂t ′ ∂t
Therefore,
∂2 ∂2 ∂2 1 ∂2 ∂2 ∂2 ∂2 1 ∂2 1 1 1 ∂2
+ + − = + + − +
+ +
∂x ′ 2 ∂y ′ 2 ∂z ′ 2 c 2 ∂t ′ 2 ∂x 2 ∂y 2 ∂z 2 c 2 ∂t 2 vx2 vy2 vz2 ∂t 2
(14)
1 ∂ 1 ∂ 2
1 ∂ 2 2
− 2 + +
vx ∂x∂t vy ∂y∂t vz ∂z∂t
This means that the function ψ (x′,ict′) does not satisfy the same form of equation as does
ψ ( x , ict) , and the equation is not invariant under a Galilean transformation.
14-4. In the K system the rod is at rest with its ends at x1 and x2 . The K′ system moves with a
velocity v (along the x axis) relative to K.
K
K′
x1 x2
If the observer measures the time for the ends of the rod to pass over a fixed point in the K′
system, we have
1 v
t1′ = t1 − 2 x1
v c2
1− 2
c
(1)
1 v
t2′ = t − 2 x2
2 2
v c
1− 2
c
where t1′ and t2′ are measured in the K′ system. From (1), we have
THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY 465
1 v
t1′ − t2′ = ( t1 − t2 ) − c 2 ( x1 − x2 )
2
(2)
v
1− 2
c
We also have
x1 − x2 = A (3)
v ( t1 − t2 ) = A (4)
Multiplying (2) by v and using (3), (4), and (5), we obtain the FitzGerald-Lorentz contraction:
v2
A′ = A 1 − (6)
c2
14-5. The “apparent shape” of the cube is that shape which would be recorded at a certain
instant by the eye or by a camera (with an infinitesimally short shutter speed!). That is, we must
find the positions that the various points of the cube occupy such that light emitted from these
points arrives simultaneously at the eye of the observer. Those parts of the cube that are farther
from the observer must then emit light earlier than those parts that are closer to the observer. An
observer, looking directly at a cube at rest, would see just the front face, i.e., a square.
When in motion, the edges of the cube are distorted, as indicated in the figures below, where
the observer is assumed to be on the line passing through the center of the cube. We also note
that the face of the cube in (a) is actually bowed toward the observer (i.e., the face appears
convex), and conversely in (b).
(a) Cube moving toward the (a) Cube moving away from the
observer. observer.
466 CHAPTER 14
14-6.
K′
K v
x1 x2
We transform the time t at the points x1 and x2 in the K system into the K′ system. Then,
vx
t1′ = γ t − 21
c
(1)
vx
t2′ = γ t − 22
c
From these equations, we have
∆t ′ = t1′ − t2′ = −γ v
( x1 − x2 ) = −γ v∆x 1
(2)
2
c c2
14-7.
K K′
v
Suppose the origin of the K′ system is at a distance x from the origin of the K system after a time
t measured in the K system. When the observer sees the clock in the K′ system at that time, he
actually sees the clock as it was located at an earlier time because it takes a certain time for a
light signal to travel to 0. Suppose we see the clock when it is a distance A from the origin of the
K system and the time is t1 in K and t′1 in K′. Then we have
vA
t1′ = γ t1 − 2
c
c ( t − t1 ) = A (1)
tv = x
t1v = A
v
t1′ = γ 1 − t (2)
c
This is the time the observer reads by means of a telescope.
14-8. The velocity of a point on the surface of the Earth at the equator is
v=
2π Re
=
(
2π × 6.38 × 108 cm )
τ 8.64 × 10 sec
4
(1)
= 4.65 × 10 4 cm/sec
which gives
v 4.65 × 10 4 cm/sec
β= = = 1.55 × 10 −6 (2)
c 3 × 1010 cm/sec
According to Eq. (14.20), the relationship between the polar and equatorial time intervals is
∆t 1
∆t ′ = ≅ ∆t 1 + β 2 (3)
1− β 2 2
∆=
1
2
( ) (
× 1.55 × 10 −6 × 3.156 × 107 sec/yr × 10 2 yr ) ( ) (5)
Thus,
14-9.
w v + dv
dm′ m + dm
The unsurprising part of the solution to the problem of the relativistic rocket requires that we
apply conservation of momentum, as was done for the nonrelativistic case. The surprising, and
key, part of the solution is that we not assume the mass of the ejected fuel is the same as the
mass lost from the rocket. Hence
p = γ mv = (γ + dγ ) ( m + dm)( v + dv ) + γ w dm′ w (1)
where –dm is the mass lost from the rocket, dm′ is the mass of the ejected fuel,
( )
w ≡ ( v − V ) 1 − vV c 2 is the velocity of the exhaust with respect to the inertial frame, and
γ w dm′
γ 2 m dv + v dm + w (2)
γ
where we of course keep infinitesimals only to first order. The additional unknown dm′ is
unalarming because of another conservation law
E = γ mc 2 = (γ + dγ ) ( m + dm) c 2 + γ w dm′ c 2 (3)
Subsequent substitution of dm′ into (2) gives, in one of its many intermediate forms
βw
γ 2 m dv 1 −
+ dm ( v − w ) = 0 (4)
c
and will finally come to its desired form after dividing by dt
m
dv
dt
+V
dm
dt
1− β2 = 0( ) (5)
The quantity dt can be measured in any inertial frame, but would presumably only make sense
for the particular one in which we measure v. Interestingly, it is not important for the ejected
fuel to have an especially large kinetic energy but rather that it be near light speed, a nontrivial
distinction. For such a case, a rocket can reach 0.6c by ejecting half its mass.
v
t ′ = γ t − 2 x1 (2)
c
v x′
t ′ = γ t − 2 1 + vt
c γ
v v2 t
t′ + x ′ = γ t − γ t=
c 2 1
c 2
γ
v
t = γ t ′ + 2 x1′
c
Solving (2) for t and substituting into (1) gives
t′ v
x1′ = γ x1 − v + 2 x1
γ c
or
x1 = γ ( x1′ + vt ′ )
THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY 469
14-11.
θ
x1
From example 14.1 we know that, to an observer in motion relative to an object, the dimensions
of objects are contracted by a factor of 1 − v 2 c 2 in the direction of motion. Thus, the x′1
component of the stick will be
A cos θ 1 − v 2 c 2
So, to the observer in K′, the length and orientation of the stick are
( )
12
A ′ = A sin 2 θ + 1 − v 2 c 2 cos 2 θ
sin θ
θ ′ = tan −1
cos θ 1 − v 2 c 2
or
12
cos 2 θ
A ′ = A sin 2 θ +
γ 2
tan θ ′ = γ tan θ
A′ = A 1 − v2 c2
2
2.5
= 100 m 1 − = 55.3 meters
3
The time measured in the racer’s frame is given by
470 CHAPTER 14
v
t ′ = γ t − 2 x1
c
µ −
( )
2.5 × 10 8 m/s (100 m )
.4 sec
c2
=
1 − ( 2.5 3)
2
= .22 µsec
14-13. ∆t ′ = γ ∆t
∆t = 1.5 µs
γ = ( 1 − 0.9992 )
−1 2
22.4
Therefore ∆t ′ 34 µs .
14-14.
K K′
source receiver
v
= γ hν 0 + hν 0
c
THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY 471
So
ν = ν 0 γ 1 +
v
c
1+ β 1+ β
= ν0 = ν0
1− β 2 1− β
1− β
ν= ν0
1+ β
Since λ = c ν
1− β
λ0 = λ
1+ β
or
1− β
λ= λ0
1+ β
4 × 10 4
With λ 0 = 656.3 nm and β = , λ = 656.4 nm.
3 × 10 8
So the shift is 0.1 nm toward the red (longer wavelength).
14-16.
K′
v
K θ′ star
θ
Earth
Consider a photon sent from the star to the Earth. From Eq. (14.92)
E′ = γ ( E − vp1 )
also
E = γ ( E′ + vp1′ )
472 CHAPTER 14
Now
hν hν 0
E = hν , E′ = hν 0 , p1 = − cos θ , p1′ = − cos θ ′
c c
Substituting yields
ν 0 = ν γ (1 + β cos θ )
and
ν = γ ν 0 (1 − β cos θ ′ )
Thus
where
β =v c
1− β
ν= ν0
1+ β
Since
ν=c λ,
1+ β
λ= λ0
1− β
5
We have λ = 1.5 λ 0 . This gives β =
13
or
v = 1.2 × 10 8 m/sec
THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY 473
14-18.
K′
v
source
K θ
light
observer
v 1+ β
ν = γ ν0 + ν0 = ν0
c 1− β
For the source receding from the observer (at a much later time) we have
hν 0
p1 = −
c
and
1− β
ν = ν0
1+ β
So
1+ β
ν = ν0 source approaching observer
1− β
1− β
ν = ν0 source receding from observer
1+ β
474 CHAPTER 14
14-19.
K
source
K′ θ
v
observer
hν hν βr
p1′ = − cos θ = −
c c β + βt2
2
r
In K : E = γ ( E′ + ν p1′ ) = hν 0
So
1 hν β
hν 0 = hν − c β r2 + βt2 r
1 − β r − βt
2 2 c β r + βt2
2
or
ν (1 − β r )
ν0 =
1 − β r2 − βt2
ν λ0 1 − β r2 − β t2
= =
ν0 λ 1 − βr
βt2 > 2β r (1 − β r )
80
The people on earth age years. The astronaut’s clock is ticking slower by a factor of γ. Thus,
3
the astronaut ages
THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY 475
80 80
1 − 0.32 = 0.95 years
3 3
So
1
− ( −2β ) β
d m0 v
v 2
14-21. F= = m0 +v (1)
( )
32
dt 1 − β 2 1− β 2
1 − β2
v vββ
= m0 +
( )
32
1− β 1 − β2
2
If we take v = v1e1 (this does not mean v 2 = v 3 = 0 ), we have
v v
v1 v1 1 1
c c = m0
F1 = m0 + v1 = mA v1 (2)
(2 32
) ( )
32
1− β 1− β 1− β
2 2
m0
F2 = v 2 = mt v 2 (3)
1 − β2
m0
F3 = v 3 = mt v 3 (4)
1 − β2
where R = 1.50 × 1011 m is the mean radius of the Earth’s orbit around the sun. Therefore,
dE
3.96 × 10 26 W (2)
dt
The corresponding rate of mass decrease is
dm 1 dE
= 4.4 × 109 kg ⋅ s −1 (3)
dt c 2 dt
The mass of the sun is approximately 1.99 × 10 30 kg , so this rate of mass decrease can continue
for a time
476 CHAPTER 14
1.99 × 10 30 yr
T= −1
1.4 × 1013 yr (4)
4.4 × 10 kg ⋅ s
9
Actually, the lifetime of the sun is limited by other factors and the sun is expected to expire
about 4.5 × 10 9 years from now.
= ( E0 + T ) − E02
2
= 2E0 T + T 2
p 2 c 2 = 2T mc 2 + T 2
14-24. The minimum energy will occur when the four particles are all at rest in the center of
the mass system after the collision.
Conservation of energy gives (in the CM system)
2Ep = 4 mp c 2
or
Ep ,CM = 2mp c 2 = 2E0
which implies γ = 2 or β = 3 2
To find the energy required in the lab system (one proton at rest initially), we transform back to
the lab
E = γ ( E′ + vp1′ ) (1)
The velocity of K′(CM) with respect to K(lab) is just the velocity of the proton in the K′ system.
So u = v.
Then
vp1′ = v ( pCM ) = v (γ mu) = γ mv 2 = γ mc 2 β 2
Since γ = 2, β = 3 2 ,
3
vp1′ = E0
2
Substituting into (1)
THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY 477
3 7
Elab = γ 2E0 + E0 = 2 E0 = 7E0
2 2
14-25. Let B = B0 z
v = vx i + v y j
Then
i j k
qv × B = q v x vy 0
0 0 B0
= q vy B0 i − vx B0 j
d d
F = qv × B = ( p) = γ m ( v ) gives
dt dt
d
dt
qB
(
v = 0 v y i − vx j
γm
)
Define ω ≡ q B0 γ m
Thus
v x = ω vy and v y = −ω vx
or
vx = ω v y = −ω 2 vx
and
vy = −ω v x = −ω 2 vy
So
vx = A cos ω t + B sin ω t
vy = C cos ω t + D sin ω t
v y ( 0 ) = −ω vx ( 0 ) = −ω v
→ B = 0, D = − v
478 CHAPTER 14
Thus
v = i v cos ω t − j v sin ω t
Then
v v
r=i sin ω t + j cos ω t
ω ω
v
The path is a circle of radius
ω
v γ mv p
r= = =
q B0 γ m q B0 q B0
From problem 14-22
12
T2
p = 2Tm + 2
c
So
12
T2
2Tm +
c 2
r=
q B0
14-26. Suppose a photon traveling in the x-direction is converted into an e − and e + as shown
below
e+
θ
θ
e–
before after
where
pp = momentum of the photon
Ee = energy of e + = energy of e −
Cons. of px gives
pp = 2 pe cos θ (p e = momentum of e + , e − )
Dividing gives
THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY 479
pp c Ee
=c=
pp pe cos θ
or
pe2 c 2 cos 2 θ = Ee2 (1)
This result can also be seen by transforming to a frame where px = 0 after the collision. But,
before the collision, px = pp c ≠ 0 in any frame moving along the x-axis. So, without another
object nearby, momentum cannot be conserved; thus, the process cannot take place.
14-27. The minimum energy required occurs when the p and p are at rest after the collision.
By conservation of energy
2Ee = 2 ( 938 MeV )
Ee = 938 MeV = T + E0
Since Ee = 0.5 MeV ,
1
14-28. Tclassical = mv 2
2
Trel = (γ − 1) mc 2 ≥ Tclassical
We desire
Trel − Tclassical
≤ 0.01
Trel
1
mv 2
1− 2 ≤ 0.01
(γ − 1) mc2
1 2
v
2 ≥ 0.99
(γ − 1) c 2
β2
≥ 1.98
γ −1
( )
−1 2
Putting γ = 1 − β 2 and solving gives
480 CHAPTER 14
v ≤ 0.115 c
14-29. E = γ E0
For
E = 30 × 109 eV
γ 5.88 × 10 4
1
( )
12
γ= or β = 1 − γ −2
1 − β2
1
β 1− = 1 − 1.4 × 10 −10
2γ 2
(
v = 1 − 1.4 × 10 −10 c )
= 0.99999999986 c
14-30. A neutron at rest has an energy of 939.6 MeV. Subtracting the rest energies of the
proton (938.3 MeV) and the electron (0.5 MeV) leaves 0.8 MeV.
14-31.
θ
0.98c
θ
where Ep = energy of each photon (Cons. of py implies that the photons have the same energy).
THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY 481
Thus
γ E0 = 2Ep
γ E0 135 MeV
Ep = = = 339 MeV
2 2 1 − 0.98 2
Conservation of px gives
cos θ =
(135 Mev/c ) ( 0.98 c)
2
= 0.98
2 1 − 0.98 2 ( 339 MeV/c )
2E0 T + T 2 = p 2 c 2
T = E02 + p 2 c 2 − E0
gives
Telectron = 999.5 MeV
14-33.
e
120˚
p
n
120˚
ν
before after
Conservation of py gives
Conservation of px gives
So
pe = pp = pν ≡ p
Substituting
E0 n = 939.6 MeV
E0 p = 938.3 MeV
E0 e = 0.5 MeV
and solving for pc gives
p = 0.554 MeV/c
pp = pe = pν = 0.554 MeV/c
Substituting into
T = E − E0
= E02 + p 2 c 2 − E0
gives ( E0ν = 0 )
Tν = 0.554 MeV
Tp = 2 × 10 −4 MeV, or 200 eV
Te = 0.25 MeV
THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY 483
2 v 2 x12 2 2 v 2 2
x1 − c 2 − c t − c 2 t
= + x2 + x2
1− v c
2 2 2 3
∆s′ 2 = ∆s2
14-35. Let the frame of Saturn be the unprimed frame, and let the frame of the first spacecraft
be the primed frame. From Eq. (14.17a) (switch primed and unprimed variables and change the
sign of v)
u1′ + v
u1 =
u ′v
1 + 12
c
Substituting v = 0.9 c
u1′ = 0.2 c
gives
u1 = 0.93 c
14-36. Since
d dX µ
Fµ =
dτ m dτ and X µ = ( x1 , x2 , x3 , ict )
we have
d dx1 d 2 x1
F1 = m
dτ = m
dτ dτ 2
d 2 x2 d 2 x3
F2 = m F3 = m
dτ 2 dτ 2
d d ( ict ) d 2t
F4 = m = icm
dτ dτ dτ 2
484 CHAPTER 14
Thus
d 2 x1 d2
F1′ = m − m γ ( x1 − vt )
dτ 2 dτ 2
d 2 x1′ d 2t
=γm = γ mv = γ ( F1 + iβ F4 )
dτ 2 dτ 2
d 2 x2′ d 2 x2
F2′ = m = m = F2 ; F3′ = F3
dτ 2 dτ 2
d vx1
F4′ = icm
dτ 2 γ t − c 2
d 2t d 2 x1
= γ icm − γ iβ m
dτ 2 dτ 2
= γ ( F4 − iβ F1 )
(
L = mc 2 1 − 1 − β 2 − ) 1 2
2
kx (1)
we compute
∂L
= − kx (2)
∂x
∂ L ∂β ∂ L β
= = mc (3)
∂v ∂ v ∂β 1 − β2
Then, from (2) and (3), the Lagrange equation of motion is
d mcβ
+ kx = 0 (4)
dt 1 − β 2
from which
mcβ
+ kx = 0 (5)
(1 − β ) 2 32
mc 2 β dβ
+ kx = 0 (7)
(1 − β ) 2 32 dx
m2 c 4
β2 = 1 − 2
2 1 2
mc +
2
k a 2
− x( )
2 k 2 2
mc + 4 a − x ( )
(
= k a2 − x 2 ) 2
(11)
2 k 2 2
mc +
2
a − x ( )
and, therefore,
β=
1 dx
=
(
k a2 − x 2 ) mc 2 + k a 2 − x 2 4 ( ) (12)
c dt mc + k a − x
2
( 2 2
) 2
The period will then be four times the integral of dt = dt(x) from x = 0 to x = a:
2
m
a
k
1 + 2mc 2 a − x
2
( )
τ=4 ∫ dx (13)
k 0
a − x 1+
2 2 k
4 mc 2
a −x
2 2
( )
Since x varies between 0 and a, the variable x a takes on values in the interval 0 to 1, and
therefore, we can define
x
sin φ = (14)
a
from which
486 CHAPTER 14
a2 − x 2
cos φ = (15)
a
and
dx = a 2 − x 2 dφ (16)
2a
π 2
(1 + 2κ 2
cos 2 φ ) dφ
τ=
κc ∫ 1 + κ 2 cos 2 φ
(18)
0
Since ka 2 mc 2 1 for the weakly relativistic case, we can expand the integrand of (18) in a
series of powers of κ :
(1 + 2κ cos φ ) ≅ 1 + 2κ
2 2
κ2
( 2
)
cos 2 φ 1 − cos 2 φ
(1 + κ cos φ )
12
2 2 2
1
≅ 1 + 2 − κ 2 cos 2 φ
2
3
= 1 + κ 2 cos 2 φ (19)
2
Substitution of (19) into (18) yields
π 2
2a 3
τ≅ ∫ 1 + 2 κ cos 2 φ dφ
2
κc 0
π 2
aπ 3κ a 1
= +
κ c 2c φ + 2 sin 2φ (20)
0
Evaluating (20) and substituting the expression for κ from (17), we obtain
m 3π a 2 k
τ = 2π + (21)
k 8c 2 m
or,
3 ka 2
τ = τ 0 1 + (22)
16 mc 2
THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY 487
dp d
14-38. F= = (γ mu)
dt dt
d
=m (γ u) (for m = constant)
dt
d u
=m
dt 1 − u 2 c 2
u
( ) ( )
12 −1 2
1− u c − u − 2 1 − u2 c 2
2 2
c du
= m
(1 − u2 c2 ) dt
( ) du
−3 2
= m 1 − u2 c 2
dt
Thus
du
( )
−3 2
F=m 1 − u2 c 2
dt
T = p 2 c 2 + m02 c 4 − m0 c 2 (1)
1
β = 1− (6)
γ2
100
γ electron = ≅ 200 (7)
0.51
488 CHAPTER 14
2
βelectron = 1 −
1
200 ≅ 0.999988 (8)
v j Eα
pα′ , j = γ pα , j − 2 (1)
c
1
where γ =
v 2j
. Since in the center-of-mass system, ∑ pα′ ,j = 0 must be satisfied, we have
α
1−
c2
v j Eα
∑ pα′ ,j = ∑ γ pα , j − 2 = 0 (2)
α α c
or,
vj ∑ pα c,j
= α (3)
c ∑ Eα
α
E0 − m0 c 2γ 1 (2)
E1 can be related to E′1 (total energy of particle 1 in the center of momentum reference frame
after the collision) through the Lorentz transformation [cf. Eq. (14.92)] (remembering that for the
inverse transformation we switch the primed and unprimed variables and change the sign of v):
THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY 489
(
E1 = m0 c 2γ 1′ 2 1 + β1′ 2 cos θ ) (4)
1 + cos θ
= (8)
2
We must now relate the scattering angle θ in the center of momentum system to the angle ψ in
the lab system.
Squaring Eq. (14.128), which is valid only for m1 = m2 , we obtain an equation quadratic in cos θ.
Solving for cos θ in terms of tan 2 ψ , we obtain
γ1 +1
− tan 2 ψ ± 1
cos θ = 2 (9)
γ1 +1
1+ tan ψ
2
2
One of the roots given in (9) corresponds to θ = π, i.e., the incident particle reverses its path and
is projected back along the incident direction. Substitution of the other root into (8) gives
T1 1 2 cos 2 ψ
= = (10)
T0 1 + γ 1 + 1 tan 2 ψ 2 cos 2 ψ + (γ 1 + 1) sin 2 ψ
2
An elementary manipulation with the denominator of (10), namely,
490 CHAPTER 14
(
2 cos 2 ψ + (γ 1 + 1) sin 2 ψ = 2 cos 2 ψ + γ 1 1 − cos 2 ψ + sin 2 ψ )
= γ 1 + sin 2 ψ + cos 2 ψ − γ 1 cos 2 ψ + cos 2 ψ
= γ 1 + 1 − γ 1 cos 2 ψ + cos 2 ψ
= (γ 1 + 1) − (γ 1 − 1) cos 2 ψ (11)
T1 2 cos 2 ψ
= (12)
T0 (γ 1 + 1) − (γ 1 − 1) cos 2 ψ
Notice that the shape of the curve changes when T1 > m0 c 2 , i.e., when γ 1 > 2 .
T1
T0
1.0
T1 = 0.1 GeV
0.8
T1 = 1 GeV
0.6
T1 = 10 GeV
0.4
0.2
0
0˚ 30˚ 60˚ 90˚ ψ
14-42.
y
γmec2 x
hν
φ
hν′
Then,
1 hν 2 hν ′ 2 hν hν ′
cos φ + sin φ = 1 = 2 2 2
2 2
+ − 2 +
c c cos θ (5)
γ me v c c
1 c
Since γ = and v = γ 2 − 1 we have
v2 γ
1−
c2
γ 2 v 2 = c 2 ( γ 2 − 1) (6)
From (5) and (7), we can find the equation for ν′:
hν hν ′ hν hν ′
2 2
h2
+
c c − 2 c c cos θ = 2 hme ( ν − ν ′ ) + 2 (
ν − ν ′)
2
(8)
c
or,
2me c 2 2me c 2
h + 2ν ( 1 − cos θ ) ν ′ = ν (9)
h
Then,
1
ν′ = ν (10)
1 + hν (1 − cos θ )
me c 2
or,
−1
E
2 (
E′ = E 1 + 1 − cos θ ) (11)
me c
The kinetic energy of the electron is
492 CHAPTER 14
1
T = γ me c 2 − me c 2 = hν − hν ′ = E 1 −
2 (
1 − cos θ )
E
1+
me c
E2 1 − cos θ
T= (12)
me c 1 + E 1 − cos θ
2
me c 2
( )