The Varying Speed of Light : c is Not a Constant

If the pressure of deep space is not a constant, and light speeds up or slows down according to pressure zones... then how can we confidently believe that the traveling speed of light doesn't vary in proportion to the surrounding pressure? The vacuum of space is not a constant, therefore the speed of light is not a constant. There will always be more discoveries of deeper parts of space with even less pressure than ever recorded; As well as, more massive objects with exponentially more pressure that tip any current scale. What if "c", "the speed of light", more accurately describes the speed at the moment of impact when light slows down to bounce off matter? Not the speed at which light "travels" in between bounces. Light bounces off matter on the atomic level and on the atomic level, all the particles have the same interior pressure; therefore, the speed at which light bounces off any given density matter will be a constant. That constant speed is 186,282 miles per second because light must always slow down before it hits matter. But, in order to measure the bouncing speed, some amount of energy must dissipate, so youre never going to accurately measure the traveling speed unless you have a frame of reference for cosmic pressure zones. What is matter? Matter is positive pressure. There is only one neutral point, or singularity, or dead center to a sphere. Like Leonardo Da Vincis Vitruvian Man, all things can fit inside of a sphere.

Take any object spin it and it will trace a circumference. While "stationary, the radius, or singularity point will experience the most pressure from all sides. Thats positive pressure or "density". Every thing has a unique amount of positive pressure in it's singularity (frequency of pressure)... except on the atomic level. All things have equal interior pressure on the atomic and subatomic level from our relative perspective. So if you spin an object in a Centripetal fashion, the reactionary Centrifugal force will push all the positive pressure outward, away from the singularity. Less weight on the singularity = less weight as a whole. There is no definitive weight to an object since weight is always dependent upon so many factors that are constantly fluxing. (Pressure, speed of rotation, etc.) The more massive a star or planet, the more that light from another source will slow down and bend around it. But not all the light bends around it. Some of that light bounces off of it allowing you to see the object that the rest of the light bends around. So we have 2 different speeds: The TRAVELING speed at which light travels in between mass. And the BOUNCING speed at which light reflects off mass. In addition, the distance from the singularity (neutral center) to the outer reach of the total diameter of Any mass is the same proportion on the atomic scale at which light bounces... and since All scales are relative, the gravitational effect on light at an atomic level is a constant. And since all matter is merely the total sum of atomic parts... and all atomic parts have the same density... that means light will always bounce off matter at the same speed. So if you had a 1 foot diameter ball, the singularity would be 6 inches inward from any given direction within that ball. The singularity (neutral center) of an "electron" would be the same proportional distance from the outer shell as the 1 foot diameter ball, but on a different scale. If the distance from the singularity (neutral center) to the outer perimeter of the diameter of any given mass is the same proportional distance, then we can say that the gravitational affect on light is relative to any given mass. That is a constant. Not, that the speed that light travels in between mass (pressure) is a constant. (Now I'm starting to believe that a "black hole" is an extreme spherical point of less pressure where light is Prevented from ever entering, not prevented from escaping.) The speed that light "travels" between mass in space can vary greatly depending on the surrounding pressure. (or lack thereof)

But when light BOUNCES OFF of any given sized particle of matter WITHIN any given pressure zone, we can measure that speed at a constant 186,282 miles a second. Light traveling THROUGH or AROUND different mediums means that the speed will vary. The thinner the medium = the faster light travels. But when it comes to measuring the speed at which light BOUNCES OFF mass WITHIN different mediums... that relative speed of the moment of impact seems to be a constant. So, the misinterpretation of E=mc^2, may be that Einstein thought it meant the speed at which energy converts to matter. I'm not sure that's accurate. I don't believe c is a constant in the regard to the "speed of light", more specifically, the traveling speed. I think it's referring to the speed at which we can measure the reflection of light off of any given particle of matter. And no matter how big or small you measure that reflection, whether it be a moon, or a particle... the speed of the REFLECTION will always be a constant 186,282 miles per second. The more I look into the exact traveling speed of light... the more ridiculous a constant traveling speed seems. Even in a vacuum, since the vacuum itself is not a constant. They only measure from within our own solar system. Imagine the lack of pressure in the depths of space beyond where any telescope can reach! And even though we can reach depths of space with telescopes.... the speed of light upon impact of matter is relative no matter where you look! So that gives the false impression that the "speed" of light traveling before impact must be the same as the impact itself. In order for us to measure the Bouncing speed of light. Light must slow down from its Traveling Speed. There is immeasurable energy that dissipates from the impact giving the false impression that the bouncing speed is the same as traveling speed. There are a multitude of answers for how the Traveling speed of light was determined. And there is seemingly no attempt to discern the difference between the Traveling speed and Bouncing speed. Some rookie back in 1676 determined the speed of light by "basing his observations from the eclipses of the moons of Jupiter." Then definitions go on to describe that the speed of light "in a vacuum" is 186,272 miles per second.... but that vacuum can always have more or less pressure .So if they are basing their observations of the speed of light from the vacuum within our solar system... then I don't sense that the speed of light can be a constant in other parts of space.

Even the lame mattress theory of gravity shows that light and time is slowed down as it approaches mass in space. (See my 2 other papers called The Fallacy of a Straight Line and Magnetic Over-Unity via Centripetal Spin) http://www.scribd.com/doc/36586248/The-Fallacy-of-a-Straight-Line-andBlack-Holes http://www.scribd.com/doc/35527270/Magnetic-Over-Unity-via-CentripetalSpin So, I really don't get how someone can ultimately determine the TRAVELING speed of light as a constant when all they've ever measured is the REFLECTION speed. ANY light we measure is within our pressure zone since the devices we use to measure are located within our pressure zone. If we attempt to look beyond our pressure zone, we will see a Red Doppler shift in any given direction. That will give the false impression that nothing is beyond that. It's like looking at a wall. There is indeed another side to every wall. In reality, Light IS. Light doesn't travel at all as Walter Russell emphatically states in his book "The Secret of Light" http://www.scribd.com/doc/29714925/Walter-Russell-The-Secret-of-Light As well as many other of his books which can be found at the University of Science and Philosophy site: http://www.Philosophy.org/ In reality, light does not travel. Light is. It takes corporeal things to measure light because the light needs to bounce off those things in order to measure it. (Observation) So then can we go so far as to say that the speed of observation is 186,282 miles per second?

The light that bounces off of everyone's eyes is a constant speed of 186,282 miles per second; therefore, the speed of everyone's observation is relative! But actual "time" is proportional with the TRAVELING speed of light, not the speed at which light slows down to REFLECT off the eye! And the TRAVELING speed can be infinitely times more than the BOUNCING speed. Look at the symbol for the Eye of Horus in the regard of this concept!

The energy in the BOUNCING speed of light is greatly dissipated from the impact upon the atoms that make up your eye. We can only measure the dissipated energy. There is no telling exactly how many times Faster the TRAVELING speed is before the impact upon matter unless you have an unimaginably large frame of reference for cosmic PRESSURE ZONES. All things SPEED UP with less pressure because there is less resistance, less drag, less inertia to prevent those things from loosing energy until they are at a state of rest. But a state of "rest" on Mars is different relative to the Earth because we are not stationary to each other like Earth is to the moon. So there never is any Universal state of rest because it's all relative on your starting location.

Just like there is no Universal limit to ANY speed. If you allow something to float in space and send it away from all planets and stars that you can..... you will see that thing SPEED UP. That's why NASA can't figure out why a Voyager Satellite wasn't where it was supposed to be when they plotted on their charts as Richard C. Hoagland stated many times on Live Radio. They think that speed is a constant in space because they assume that a vacuum is a vacuum, that's it and that's all. No. There can always be less pressure in a vacuum the deeper in space you go. And the deeper you go, the less resistance; therefore, the more you SPEED UP. Now I'm thinking that the reason why you can't hear any sound in space is more than "because it's a vacuum." Perhaps that vacuum allows for the sound to travel without any resistance, rather, exponentially less resistance. That would allow for sound itself to travel faster than 1125 feet per second. (You can never achieve zero resistance because there is no universal frame of reference for zero! You can always have less resistance, or more for that matter) If sound itself traveled faster than 1125 feet per second... we wouldn't consider it sound and we wouldn't be able to hear a thing. So sound and light behave in a similar fashion. With increasing pressure, sound and light slow down because of resistance. With decreasing pressure, sound and light are able to "travel" at more natural speeds. Natural meaning, without resistance. Interesting to note the number 1125. That is how many RPMs the 3rd ring of magnets spin on John Searl's SEG, when powered with 1.5 volts @ .06 amps. The law of squares has specific numbers that work and the number 1125 falls within those rules. Another thing interesting to note is that if there is nothing for sound to bounce off in space.... the sound will speed up until it meets resistance. It MUST bounce off of something in order to loose energy and dissipate.

Decades ago, the NAZIs broadcasted the Olympics into space. About a decade later... scientists received a radio signal which they though was Extraterrestrial. It was actually the same broadcast but being reflected from a source they didn't know. The scientists had no clue where the sound came from and it's still a mystery to them because they don't realize that sound speeds up in space. Sound will only slow down to the speed at which it was initiated when there is matter for it to bounce off of. So if you send a T.V. signal into space... it will speed up faster than light until it encounters resistance in the form of matter. At which point, it will slow down to the speed at which it was initiated. In this case, a T.V. signal. So then it will reflect off that matter and some of the energy will be dissipated from that impact. But not all the energy is absorbed, so the signal will go back into space. It will speed up again until it encounters another object. Each particle that is vibrating and traveling with the information, is it's own particle yet has all the information of the whole. Like a pixel in a hologram. Each pixel contains the entire picture. You can cut the hologram's pixels in half and you would only see a picture half the size. It's not like half the screen is missing or half the message is missing. You just need to focus your eyes to see the picture small enough if it was cut in half too many times. Even if the pixel was as small as an atom... you could still watch the hologram in its entirety. So when sound or light bounces off of matter in space, it gets reflected in other directions. But the information contained in any given part of that wave remains in it's entirety. It might be dampened a whole lot, but you can still focus in on it given that you had a powerful enough radio or something to tune in the frequency and amplify it. I believe that is what our brains are. And meditation is tuning in and amplifying any ideas or information that has already been reflected time and time again throughout the cosmos.

Gaining insight through meditation is like fishing. Unless you sit in silence for a while, you'll disturb the waters and scare away the fish. The fish represent the ideas and answers you want. The waters in this case represent your flow of thought. The more you think, the more you are splashing around scaring away the "fish". Your intention is the bait / net. A fishing net doesn't think. It effortlessly collects the fish that swim in its path without disturbing the waters. A net is made according to the size of fish it wants to catch. The bigger nets allow the small fish to pass through. Spend the time to sow your own nets and reap your own fish. The last part of the equation is knowing when and where to fish. There is a time and place for everything. Make time for yourself in any quiet place. The more natural and ancient the surroundings the better, in my opinion. I prefer late at night when everyone else in the area is asleep and not consciously thinking. (Less splashing about in the sea of consciousness) Articles of others who question the so called limit of light: http://www.kottke.org/02/08/speed-light-not-constant http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/10/991005114024.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_speed_of_light http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_sea http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation#Hole_theory Particles have been consistently measured in Naval research labs going faster than light. Violating causality. Lightspeed barrier has been breached already, mathematically, AND with practical experiment, including HYPER-LIGHT communication systems. Scalar Transceivers. Lightspeed in 2010, is no more a barrier to human and information transport, than the sound-barrier was to living legend Chuck Yeager, and the Bell X-1 Rocket-plane. In fact, the equations and formulae for the sound barrier are the SAME as for the so-called "Light-Barrier". The speed of light depends on the permeability and permittivity of free space. If you can alter those you can change the speed of light, but only locally. But... When you isolate the space around you via an electro-static vacuum, your locality becomes relative to another point in space compared to the altered pressure in your vacuum.

When you alter the local space around you to equal the intensity of negative pressure equal to other parts of the universe... you can travel instantly to those depths of pressure because an equalization wants to take place. That equalization will come in the form of Distance in any given amount of time. Given that you alter your local surrounding pressure, you will be attracted to the like potential of the nearest like pressure. In this case, the nearest like pressure would be deep space, therefore you will "zip off" at super-luminal speeds to until your local pressure matches the surrounding pressure. So if you generate an electro-static vacuum equal to the pressure of the vacuum just outside of Earth.... you will zip off to that pressure zone instantly, REGARDLESS of how far away the nearest pressure zone is of like potential. To my knowledge, only a magnetic bearing with a helical variation of North / South can handle the torque necessary to generate an instantaneous drop in local pressure. (SEG) A vacuum of negative pressure = Aetheric low pressure. Anything gaining positive pressure = physical density. Anything decreasing in pressure through a vacuum= Aetheric pressure. "IMPLOSIVE UNIFORMITY" Human Kind has yet to witness what I call "Implosive Uniformity" which is a directional vacuous beam of negative pressure. A laser beam is an example of "Explosive Uniformity". How do we achieve suction in an even uniform column? We can have a fan that blows air chaotically. Or we can have the new dyson fan which creates a focused beam of uniform air. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8he8afjQyd8&feature=related Chaotic in this sense means blowing outward or sucking inward in the shape of a cone and Uniform means blowing outward or sucking inward in an even column. We can have a vacuum cleaner hose which sucks in air chaotically. (cone) I have yet to see a focused beam of a uniform vacuum. (column) Our breath is chaotic because we suck in and blow out in the shape of a cone. We can have a flash light which emits light chaotically. Or we can have a laser pointer which sends a focused beam of uniformed light. We can have a speaker which sends sound outward chaotically. Or we can have the new hypersonic audio ray invented by Woody Norris: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF9G9M0cR0E So if we can have outward forces that generate chaotic and uniform beams of frequencies, then why can't we have implosive forces that generate the inverse

uniform frequencies? Anything gaining pressure will radiate heat. Anything decreasing in pressure will give off gravity. A source of positive pressure will make light move slower around it's circumference, or, light slows down around a curve. But a source of negative pressure will make light speed up around it's circumference, or light speeds up around a curve. The TRAVELING speed of light seems to be Uniform while the BOUNCING speed is Chaotic. There is NO limit to uniform energy, but chaos has no order; therefore, it will always meet resistance. A wormhole would be what you experience if you were to be riding within that vacuous beam. The trip within that beam is instant! That's how communications can be non-linear and instant over VAST distances of space and even time. But the frequency of that vacuous beam can be tweaked from the lowest possible hertz range to the highest possible hertz range. And you can always increase the frequency given that you have enough power! "Warp Speed" is literally the equalizing of pressure faster than the Bouncing speed of light. So if you generated an electro-static vacuum, that would drop your local pressure dramatically. The lower you drop your local pressure, the less you weigh. It would get to the point where you would be floating over the ground and if you had your surrounding vacuum pressurized enough.... I could flick your ship with my finger and you would zip off to a point in deep space where the pressure was equal. In essence, you would weigh less than a photon; therefore, you would travel faster than a photon. Anything that travels faster than a photon is "super luminal" or Warp Speed. Take an empty water bottle and put the cap on it. You can squeeze the bottle lightly until the cap pops off from the pressure..... or you can stomp your foot on the bottle and watch the cap zip off. The cap will go as far as the amount of pressure you squeezed the bottle. So, how fast and how far would that cap shoot if you stomped on that bottle with a Million pounds of pressure? That bottle cap will reach a farther distance in the same amount of time. Same principle except the bottle uses outward pressure. We want vacuum pressure. The only way to achieve that is through electro-statics.

John Searl's SEG can provide the power needed, but that still doesn't answer how to achieve a vacuum in a beam. Even a "black hole" is cone shaped. What I'm referring to could be similar to a Tipler Cylinder http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipler_cylinder Is Implosive Uniformity another term for "Scalar Technology?" Id consider it a non-hertzian wave form.

PLEASE WATCH THE NEWEST 4 PART INTERVIEW WITH PROFESSOR JOHN SEARL ON MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL: http://www.YouTube.com/user/TheRealVerbz
John Searls SEG pairs electrons from the Dirac Sea of negative energy as described in the above link. It doesnt destroy anything. It converts the energy already present. Like funneling a reservoir of water through a dam. 2 electrons paired together behave like a photon but still carry the electric charge. But the electric charge is slightly different than any electric charge we know, since all electricity we know travels through a wire or chaotically through induction and doesnt behave like a photon. When the charge is released, the pair of electrons go back to behaving like normal electrons, Still carrying their original charges. A true synergistic effect through resonance occurs while they are paired. (Go back and look at the Quantum Double Slit Experiment with this notion in mind.)

The SEG takes a few of the 7 extra electrons from the F shell of the rare earth neodymium and pairs them up. Then tunnels them through the other 3 layers of materials. From the center outward, we have electric, dia-electric, magnetic and diamagnetic. Neodymium, Teflon (nylon 66), permanent magnet, copper. Collector, Gate (insulator), accelerator, emitter. All working harmoniously to create that synergistic effect of wave resonance.

But it's also because the magnets on the rollers and plates are all magnetized in a specific fashion where the North / South has variations (waveform) rather than anything normally commercially magnetized with regular diametrical or axial magnetization. Perhaps he modulates certain frequencies while magnetizing the materials so that all frequencies But the frequency he wants gets imprinted. So we think that John Searl isolates a certain bandwidth like blue magnetism or green magnetism. No.

He possibly solates a particular electric frequency which in turn imprints an equal and opposite magnetic frequency. When you see the color red, you are actually seeing every BUT the color red. So that missing color is what you perceive. John Searl is imprinting everything BUT that bandwidth onto his materials. You can magnetize a material with just a direct current and standard charge, or you can modulate that current and isolate the frequency of electricity which in turn will imprint the frequency of magnetism, or rather.. every frequency BUT the frequency you left out in the modulated current.

Another member of the Searl Team, Russell Anderson of http://www.AppliedElectroGravitics.com says: The DC with one strip of superimposed AC makes all these little N/S poles running at regularly spaced intervals around the plate going one way, and 90degrees out of phase on the runner sets going the same direction: making helical gears out of magnetic-fields instead of solid material. Since the poles are skewed, like helical-cult gears, the system can never find equilibrium (or magnetic-lockup), so is free to rotate without any input save for the current that is running thru the layers of plate and runner systems, which tests show is anywhere from 5-15 Volts DC. Thats is MORE than enough EMF to sustain rotation. And of course, more load is placed on the SEG, the faster it runs and the colder and lighter in weight it gets. Fernando Morris with the modulated magnetizing equipment weighing 8 Tons.

The SEG can provide limitless power to ANY device with no outside fuel source and no pollutants. You can put this in a car and NEVER need gasoline. You can go so far as to hand the device down generation after generation because it never wears down. It never gets old. It's frictionless, heatless and vibrationless. It actually gets so cold that it reaches super conductivity and levitates, if you allow the magnets to spin fast enough. It will levitate and create its own gravity field and can fly at thousands of miles an hour with no inertia and 1/2 gravity on board. The motor/generator is known as the SEG, but when it takes flight, it can more accurately be called the IGV (Inverse Gravity Vehicle). We want these in hospitals because they promote rapid healing of burns and scar tissue. The device puts out an excess of negative ions and those can also turn grey hair back to its natural color as well as grow back lost teeth. The negative ions also nullify nuclear radiation. So just by using this to power our devices, we would heal and purify the atmosphere. Within 5 years of implementing this technology, there would be no smog in China, no worries of nuclear radiation, and promotes Global cooling. The reason why dust is able to float in our rooms is because our rooms are positively charged. With a strong negative field emitted from the device.... no dust is able to float. Which means all that bacteria and virus on that dust can't get into your lungs and nose. There are too many other benefits to list here. It will change the energy industry rendering gas, oil, goal, nuclear, solar, wind and everything else obsolete. The fraudulent pharmaceutical industry would perish. The airline industry would fail. Etc etc etc. The world as we know it would end. And without the 2012 Doomsday scenario. This would be a pleasant transition if we simply accepted the technology. Just think how many new jobs will be created to tear down the current infrastructure and re-build anew? More jobs than exist today with Real direction and nobility.

Article from 1968:

The BBC filmed John Searl flying his IGVs every Sunday for 2 years from 1968 1970. He successfully flew the unmanned Demo 1 model around the moon and back at 3500 km/hr in 1968 via a triangulation of ham radio signals. He gave an 11 foot version of the IGV to Edwards Airforce Base back in 1968 as well. Here is the letter from Major George Uhlig requesting advice on flight and information on the technology:

When the Air Commodor of Great Britain saw John Searl flying his devices, he got on the live radio the next day and said, I witnessed John Searl flying his machines and he speaks the truth. John Searl will be master of all air and space very soon. The Russians and Americans were in a cold war at that time and were racing to the moon using conventional rocketry. When they heard the radio broadcast, they werent pleased. And began intensely studying the technology while effectively railroading John Searl in the process which is why we need to re-build the infrastructure and get volunteers, funding and any help available to bring this technology to the people! This stuff cant be patented because 1) Its a know-how and you cant patent a know-how. And 2) Any patent can be seized under a National Security Order if the powers that be deem it a threat to their security. This will Not be privatized or patented. So WE need to help this to fruition. --Jason Verbelli http://www.Facebook.com/Verbelli http://www.SearlSolution.com http://www.SwallowCommand.com http://www.MySpace.com/JohnSearlStory http://www.JohnSearlStory.com

This will replace the grid. You're home's power box would be connected to the SEG from within your own home. So anything you plug into the sockets in your wall will be powered by the SEG. It can handle ANY load. The more you use it, the more negative ions are released which means the more health benefits. You'd still use the same wall sockets in your home, but you wouldn't have to pay anyone for the power and you will never have black outs. The power company could monitor their meter all they wanted. They would just see that no power was being used in your home. Well..... not THEIR power.