RH BILL OF WRONGS

In addition to the perceived imperfections of RH pointed out in our earlier GRAINS OF ALMIGHTY GOD, RH POSITIVE NEGATIVES and REPRODUCTIVE HABAGAT, the following are registered : I. RH violates the Constitutionally-guaranteed Right to Privacy. II. RH Degrades Natures Gift of Human Ecstacy.

I. Violation of Right to Privacy.

Please note: a. The Bill of Rights of the Constitution is institutionalized as safeguard against possible abuses of the State, thru the Government, in violation of a persons human right. Right to privacy is invoked by a person against the State ; not by the State, or anyone acting/pretending to act for the State, against a person ( as is erroneously advanced by RH sponsors forgetting that RH is not a citizen-initiative bill). A judicial dispute between individuals is a different matter. b. It is a view that what the Constitution prohibits is any improper/unauthorized intrusion into a persons privacy, that, of course includes acts done privately and away from the disgusting curiosity of the non participant RH, by proposing legislated use of condoms and other contraceptives, wishes for government and its satraps and businessmen to participate in the most private act of sexual intercourse by, in effect, regulating the use of private parts through rubberized jacketing /blocking that prevents epidermal friction and the natural interaction among sperm and egg cells. More of similar import may be said of government sponsored/induced use of cell-killing pills. What can be more unnecessarily/insensitively obtrusive than legislated regulation of/meddling with the use of citizens private parts? It may be helpful to appreciate a distinction between public private parts and private private parts. We might associate ourselves with statutes requiring fresh-breath, clean ears, mote-less eyes, neat noses, well-groomed hair . But such would involve private parts routinelyopen to publics senses. d. Would our revered national and international heroes have consented/consent to such disgusting intrusions involving their reproductive assets or those of their honored parents and forebears and other heroic kin? Let our descendants honor us with a fitting answer.
1

II. Derogation of Nature's Sacred Gift of Human Ecstacy.

A reading of those for and against RH (given its seeming heavy reliance on synthetics/artificialities) has summarized friends impressions into : A revulsion at the badgering flirtation of one Macked with the sex-appeal of dried singkamas : A nagging preference for the lingering romance of a single, freshly-plucked Sampaguita over the bewitching splendor of a bouquet of American/caucasian plastic

Roses.

The Filipino deserves no less Respectfully submitted, all for Almighty God ALways Roberto Siccuan De Alban Sampaloc, for Tumauini, Isabela 23 August 2012