Urlay View Residential Development Urlay Nook, Stockton on Tees Proposed Residential Development

Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

Contents 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 Site Description & Proposed Development ................................................................ 2 Legislative Framework............................................................................................... 3 Flood Risk ................................................................................................................. 7 Development Potential ............................................................................................ 11 Conclusions............................................................................................................. 12

Appendices A Drawings B3 Architects drawing No.: 81165 G7 SI-001 Rev A Existing Site Location Plan Fairhurst Drawing 91483/2001 Proposed Drainage Strategy, Option 1 Fairhurst Drawing 91483/2002 Proposed Drainage Strategy, Option 2

Surface Water Runoff Northumbrian Water Limited Sewer Records Greenfield Runoff Calculation Micro Drainage Outputs

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

1.0

Introduction

Fairhurst were appointed by Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd and West Raynham Developments Ltd to undertake a Flood Risk Assessment for a residential development on land south of Urlay Nook Road, Stockton on Tees. The aim of this Flood Risk Assessment report is to evaluate the development potential of the site with regard to flood risk and drainage, identifying potential risk both to and from any development. Fairhurst have carried out the following: i. ii. iii. Detailed analysis of flood risk; Analysis of surface water runoff; and Assessment of the development potential of the site with regards to flood risk in line with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

2.0

Site Description & Proposed Development

The development site is located to the south west of Stockton on Tees, north of the A67. The site is bound by the A67 to the south, and Urlay Nook Road on the north and east boundary and greenfield land on the western boundary, separating the site from the Police Tactical Training Centre. The National Grid Reference for the site is NZ408143. The area of the site is approximately 6.57ha and the boundary of the development is shown in Appendix A. At present, the site is undeveloped greenfield land. It is proposed that the development will consist of residential properties with associated access roads, a community building and open green space.

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

3.0

Legislative Framework

One of the key aims of the NPPF is to ensure that flood risk is taken into account to avoid inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding, and to direct development away from areas at highest risk. Where new development is, exceptionally, necessary in such areas, policy aims to make it safe without increasing flood risk elsewhere and where possible, reducing flood risk overall. A risk-based approach should be adopted at all levels of planning. Applying the source pathway-receptor model to planning for development in areas of flood risk requires: a strategic approach which avoids adding to the causes or sources of flood risk, by such means as avoiding inappropriate development in flood risk areas and minimising run-off from new development onto adjacent and other downstream property, and into the river systems; managing flood pathways to reduce the likelihood of flooding by ensuring that the design and location of the development maximises the use of SUDS, and takes account of its susceptibility to flooding, the performance and processes of river/coastal systems and appropriate flood defence infrastructure, and of the likely routes and storage of floodwater, and its influence on flood risk downstream; and reducing the adverse consequences of flooding on the receptors (i.e. people, property, infrastructure, habitats and statutory sites) by avoiding inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding.

Flood risk assessment should be carried out to the appropriate degree at all levels of the planning process, to assess the risks of all forms of flooding to and from development taking climate change into account and to inform the application of the sequential approach. A sequential risk-based approach to determining the suitability of land for development in flood risk areas is central to the policy statement and should be applied at all levels of the planning process. In areas at risk of river or sea flooding, preference should be given to locating new development in Flood Zone 1. If there is no reasonably available site in Flood Zone 1, the flood vulnerability of the proposed development can be taken into account in locating development in Flood Zone 2 and then Flood Zone 3. Within each Flood Zone new development should be directed to sites at the lowest probability of flooding from all sources. Flood risk has been categorised as High, Medium and Low based on the probability of inundation. Extract from the Flood Zones set out in the Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework highlight the likely response to planning applications within these zones.

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

Zone 1 Low Probability Definition This zone comprises land assessed as having a less than 1 in 1000 annual probability of river or sea flooding in any year (<0.1%). Appropriate uses All uses of land are appropriate in this zone. Flood risk assessment requirements For development proposals on sites comprising one hectare or above the vulnerability to flooding from other sources as well as from river and sea flooding, and the potential to increase flood risk elsewhere through the addition of hard surfaces and the effect of the new development on surface water run-off, should be incorporated in a flood risk assessment. This need only be brief unless the factors above or other local considerations require particular attention. Policy aims In this zone, developers and local authorities should seek opportunities to reduce the overall level of flood risk in the area and beyond through the layout and form of the development, and the appropriate application of sustainable drainage systems. Zone 2 Medium Probability Definition This zone comprises land assessed as having between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1000 annual probability of river flooding (1% 0.1%) or between a 1 in 200 and 1 in 1000 annual probability of sea flooding (0.5% 0.1%) in any year. Appropriate uses Essential infrastructure and the water-compatible, less vulnerable and more vulnerable uses, as set out in table 2, are appropriate in this zone. The highly vulnerable uses are only appropriate in this zone if the Exception Test is passed. Flood risk assessment requirements All development proposals in this zone should be accompanied by a flood risk assessment. Policy aims In this zone, developers and local authorities should seek opportunities to reduce the overall level of flood risk in the area through the layout and form of the development, and the appropriate application of sustainable drainage techniques. Zone 3a High Probability Definition This zone comprises land assessed as having a 1 in 100 or greater annual probability of river flooding (>1%) or a 1 in 200 or greater annual probability of flooding from the sea (>0.5%) in any year. Appropriate uses The water-compatible and less vulnerable uses of land (table 2) are appropriate in this zone. The highly vulnerable uses should not be permitted in this zone. The more vulnerable uses and essential infrastructure should only be permitted in this zone if the Exception Test is passed. Essential infrastructure permitted in this zone should be designed and constructed to remain operational and safe for users in times of flood. Flood risk assessment requirements All development proposals in this zone should be accompanied by a flood risk assessment.

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

Zone 3a (cont.) Policy aims In this zone, developers and local authorities should seek opportunities to: reduce the overall level of flood risk in the area through the layout and form of the development and the appropriate application of sustainable drainage techniques; relocate existing development to land in zones with a lower probability of flooding; and

create space for flooding to occur by restoring functional floodplain and flood flow pathways and by identifying, allocating and safeguarding open space for flood storage. Zone 3b The Functional Floodplain

Definition Local planning authorities should identify in their Strategic Flood Risk Assessments areas of functional floodplain and its boundaries accordingly, in agreement with the Environment Agency. The identification of functional floodplain should take account of local circumstances and not be defined solely on rigid probability parameters. But land which would flood with an annual probability of 1 in 20 (5%) or greater in any year, or is designed to flood in an extreme (0.1%) flood, should provide a starting point for consideration and discussions to identify the functional floodplain. Appropriate uses Only the water-compatible uses and the essential infrastructure listed in Table 2 that has to be there should be permitted in this zone. It should be designed and constructed to: remain operational and safe for users in times of flood; result in no net loss of floodplain storage; not impede water flows; and not increase flood risk elsewhere. Essential infrastructure in this zone should pass the Exception Test. Flood risk assessment requirements All development proposals in this zone should be accompanied by a flood risk assessment. Policy aims In this zone, developers and local authorities should seek opportunities to: reduce the overall level of flood risk in the area through the layout and form of the development and the appropriate application of sustainable drainage techniques; and relocate existing development to land with a lower probability of flooding.

Table 1 (continued): Extract from Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

The Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework sets out the compatibility of developments within each Flood Zone. This is summarised in Table 2.
Flood Risk Vulnerability classification Zone 1 Flood Zone Zone 2 Zone 3a Zone 3b Exception Test Required Exception Test Required Exception Test Required Exception Test Required

Essential Infrastructure

Water Compatible

Highly Vulnerable

More Vulnerable

Less Vulnerable

Development Acceptable Development not suitable

Table 2:

Flood Risk Vulnerability and Flood Zone Compatibility

Where required an exception test must be passed in order for developments of that nature to be justified within the Flood Zone. For the Exception Test to be passed the following must be demonstrated: a) b) c) it must be demonstrated that the development provides wider sustainability benefits to the community that outweigh flood risk, informed by a SFRA where one has been prepared. the development should be on developable previously-developed land or, if it is not there are no reasonable alternative sites on developable previouslydeveloped land; and a FRA must demonstrate that the development will be safe, without increasing flood risk elsewhere, and, where possible, will reduce flood risk overall.

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

4.0 4.1

Flood Risk EA Flood Map

The Environment Agency Flood Map shows that the proposed development site is located in Flood Zone 1 (Low Probability), as shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1 Extract of EA Flood Map, Stockton on Tees

= Flooding from river or sea without defences during a 1 in 100 year event. = Additional flooding during an extreme event (1 in 1000 year event) = Location of development 4.2 Fluvial Flooding

The site is located north of Nelly Burdons Beck, which is located 150m south of the development boundary, on the opposite side of the A67. Existing ground levels across the site are approximately 15 m above the river. It is therefore considered to be at low risk of flooding, even in an extreme event when allowances have been made for the possible effects of climate change.

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

4.3

Surface Water Runoff

4.3.1 Existing Site Runoff The areas of proposed development are currently Greenfield land. The development could therefore lead to an increase in surface water runoff from the site through the creation of hard standing areas, such as roads, paths and roofs. The site covers an area of approximately 6.57 ha and is entirely undeveloped greenfield land. The EA/DERFA R&D Technical Report W5-074 Preliminary Rainfall Runoff Management for Developments states that for developments which are less than 50 ha in size the Institute of Hydrology Report 124 (IH124) Flood Estimation for Small Catchments should be used to calculate the peak greenfield runoff rates. This advice is replicated in The SUDS Manual (CIRIA C697). The IH124 method uses the following equation to calculate greenfield runoff: QBAR, rural = 0.00108 * AREA0.89 * SAAR1.17 * SOIL2.17 Where: QBAR, rural = Mean Annual Flood (m3/s) AREA = Catchment Area (km2) SAAR = Standard Average Annual Rainfall (mm) SOIL = Soil Index (from Wallingford Procedure Winter Rainfall Acceptance (WRAP) maps) Technical Report W5-074 states that Where developments are smaller than 50 ha the analysis for determining the peak Greenfield discharge rate should use 50 ha in the formula and linearly interpolate the flow rate value based on the ratio of the development to 50 ha. The Greenfield runoff rate has been calculated on a per hectare basis for a range of return periods. Table 1 summarises the results and the full calculations can be seen in Appendix B.
Event 1 in 1 year QBAR 1 in 30 year 1 in 100 year Greenfield Runoff Rate (l/s/ha) 3.1 3.7 6.2 7.6

Table 1. Greenfield runoff rates

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

4.3.2 Surface Water Drainage Principles The Building Regulations Approved Document H sets out a hierarchy of discharge points for a rainwater system. In order of priority, the possibilities are given as: 1. an adequate soakaway or some other adequate infiltration system; or where that is not reasonably practicable, 2. a watercourse; or where that is not reasonably practicable, 3. a sewer. The application of these principles is discussed in the sections below. 4.3.3 Surface Water Drainage In line with the Building Regulations, the first choice of discharge for surface water runoff should be infiltration. A Geo-Environmental Desk Study has been undertaken at this site and found the site to be underlain by low permeability glacial tills, precluding the use of infiltration drainage. Surface water will, therefore, discharge to either a watercourse or a sewer at the existing greenfield runoff rate. The greenfield runoff rate has been calculated in accordance with the EA/DERFA R&D Technical Report W5-074 Preliminary Rainfall Runoff Management for Developments; calculations can be seen in Appendix B. It is anticipated that the development will create an impermeable area of 3.33ha; approximately 50% of the total site area. Table 2 summarises the allowable discharge rates based on this area:
Event 1 in 1 year QBAR 1 in 30 year 1 in 100 year Allowable Discharge Rate (l/s) 10.3 12.3 20.6 25.3

Table 2 Allowable discharge rates. To ensure that the proposed discharge rates can be achieved, it will be necessary to provide surface water attenuation within the development. The Quick Storage element of the industry standard software Micro Drainage Source Control has been used to provide an initial indication of the storage volumes which might be required. The Environment Agency generally advises that a lifespan of 100 years should be used for residential developments. The Technical Guidance to the NPPF states that for the time period 2085 to 2115, peak rainfall intensity should be increased by 30% to account for the possible impacts of climate change. On the basis that the development will result in the creation of 3.33ha of impermeable surfaces, approximately 1650m3 of storage will be required for events up to the 1 in 100 year return period with 30% increase in rainfall due to climate change. The results of the quick storage estimate are shown in Appendix C.

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

As infiltration drainage is unsuitable at this site and following the hierarchy outlined in The Building Regulations Part H, surface water could outfall to Nelly Burdons Beck, south of the site, at the existing greenfield runoff rates. In order to provide the necessary volume of attenuation, storage will be provided within the main development and also within the land south of the A67 (locally known as Eliffs Mill) which is also within the ownership of the client. Attenuation within the main development site could be provided through a combination of green roofs, pervious pavements, geocellular tanks, ponds, swales or oversize pipes. At Eliffs Mill, it is proposed to construct a detention basin which could provide at least half of the required attenuation subject to resolution of all ecological issues. The remainder will be provided within the housing estate. A schematic of this drainage design is shown in drawing 91483/2001 in Appendix A. Discharge to Nelly Burdons Beck will be subject to consent from the relevant parties including the Environment Agency. Should discharge to the nearest watercourse prove unsuitable, surface water could be discharged to the NWL surface water sewer south east of the site at the junction of Urlay Nook Road and Lartington Way (refer to Appendix B). Attenuation of surface water would be provided entirely within the proposed housing development. A schematic of this drainage design is shown on drawing 91483/2002 in Appendix A. Attenuation could be provided through a combination of green roofs, pervious pavements, geocellular tanks, ponds, swales or oversize pipes. The sewer would be laid within the highway verge, to the north of the A67 and Urlay Nook Road, subject to Highway Authority approval. This will allow a connection by gravity to the adopted sewer at NWL manhole 1001. The section of the sewer from the site boundary to the existing sewer will constructed in accordance with Sewers for Adoption 6th Edition and will be put forward for adoption. This option would be subject to consent from the Environment Agency as the sewer downstream of NWL manhole 0001 outfalls to Nelly Burdons Beck. Similarly, approval from NWL will be required to confirm whether this sewer has the capacity to accept the calculated flows from the site. .

10

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

5.0

Development Potential

The proposed development is within Flood Zone 1 (Low Probability). No detailed sequential test is therefore required to identify sites of lower risk. This is in line with the information set out in The Technical Guidance to the NPPF. The proposed residential development can be classified as More Vulnerable according to Table 2 of The Technical Guidance to the NPPF. From table 3 in the Technical Guidance, the proposed development is suitable for this site, therefore the Sequential Test is considered to be satisfied and no exception test is required.

11

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

6.0

Conclusions

The flood risk assessment for the proposed housing development at Urlay Nook Road, Stockton on Tees, has been prepared in accordance with the NPPF and the Technical Guidance to the NPPF. The development site is not within the Environment Agencys indicative flood envelopes and is therefore classed as being within Flood Zone 1. Based on the compatibility of developments within each Flood Zone, set out within the Technical Guidance to the NPPF, the site is suitable for all types of developments. Increased runoff from the introduction of impermeable surfaces will be attenuated to the equivalent greenfield runoff rate to ensure no increase in flood risk. As the site is unsuitable for the use of infiltration drainage surface water will be discharged to Nelly Burdons Beck, south of the site. Should this prove unsuitable, a connection to the nearest adopted surface water sewer will be required. An analysis of the attenuation storage volume required to ensure no increase in runoff has been undertaken. It has been demonstrated that it will be possible to provide the required storage volume within the site boundary. The possible effects of climate change have been considered by acknowledging the requirement to make an allowance for increased rainfall in the calculation of the surface water discharge rates over the lifespan of the development in line with NPPF.

12

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

APPENDIX A Drawings B3 Architects drawing No.: 81165 G7 SI-001 Rev A Existing Site Location Plan Fairhurst Drawing 91483/2001 Proposed Drainage Strategy, Option 1 Fairhurst Drawing 91483/2002 Proposed Drainage Strategy, Option 2

30.0

29.5

29.0

30

.0

29

.5

29.5

29.5

29.0

29.0

29.5
29 .0

28

.0

29 .0

29 .0

28

.5
29.0

29.0

29.0

28.5

28.5

28.5

27

.0

28.5

27.5

29 .0

28.0

28
28.0
28.0

.5

27

.0

28.0

27.5

28.0

28.5

27.5

26.5

28

.5

28.0

26.5

26.0
27.5

26.0

26.5

25.5
28.5

26.0
26.5

27.0

23

21.5
18

.0

17.0

20.5

26.5

27.0

22
15.0

.5

24

.0
25.0

26

.0

21
19.0
20.0

.0

16.5
15.5
13.5

24

.5

16.0

14.0
14.5
15.0

22

23 .0

.5

26.0

26.5
18.5

15.5

27.0

14.5
15.0
17.0

20.5
19 .5

25

.5
28.0
27.5

13.5

13.5
14.0
18.0
14.0

21

.5

24
14.0

.0

19 .0

22
21 .0

.5

26.5
25 .0

27.0

26
24

17

.0

.5

.5

23

.5

19
13.5

.5

22

.0
25.5

17 .0

18

.5

20

.5

27
26.0

.0

19
14 .0
18 .0

.0

21

26.5
.5

24.0

16 .

5
25 .5

25 .0

27.5

24

16

.5

26

.0

18 .5
17 .5

.0
26.5

23

.5

27.0

14

.5

26 .0

18.0

23

.0

24.0

25.5

27.5

24

.5
25.0

21

.5

26.5

22
16 .5

25.5

21
20 .0

.0

24.0

25.5

22

.0 13

.0

23.0

17

.0

.0

23.5
25 .0

14

15

20

.5

.5

22.5
21 .5

23.0
24.0
25

28.0
.0

13.5

21
20 .0

.0

22.0

24.5

22.5

23.5

25.0

16

.0
21.5

13.0

18

.5

19.5

20 .5

23.0
25.0

22.0

24.0

21.0

24.5

18 .0
19.0
14.0

20 .0

22.5

23.5

16

.5

21.5

20.5
15 .0

16

17 .
.0

5
18.5

19

23.0
.5

22.0
21.0

24.0

13.5

17

20.0

22.5

.0

19

23.5
.0

15

.5

18

.0

14

20
.5
19.5

.5

21.5

24.0

22.0

13.0

23.0
24

16
13.0

.5
17 .5

18.5

15

21.0

.0

23.5

16

.0

20.0

22.5 21.5

19.0
17 .0

18.0
19.5

20.5

24.0

14.0
14 .5

22.0

23.0

21.0

15

.5

18.5
23.5

16
.5
13

.5

19.0
17.5
20 .0

21.5

22.5

13

15
14 .0
13.0

18.0

.0
16 .0
17.0

18.5
20.5

22.0

23.0

19 .5

21.0

17.5
14.0 14.5

18.0
21.5 15.5
22.5

16.5

19 .0

20 .0

17.0

20.5
17.5

22.0
15.0
21.0

16.0
13.5

14.0
16.5

18 .5

19

.5

17.0 20.0
14 .5
13 .0

21.5

13.5
15.5

16.0

20.5
18 .0

19 .0

13.0

12.5

12

16
.5

.5
21 .0

15.5
13.5
14

19.5

15.0
16 .0

.0

17

.5
18.5
20.0

13.0 12.5

14.5
12.5

15.0

17 .0
15

19.0

13 .5

14.5
18 .0

19.5

14.0
.5 13.
0

12

18.5
16
15

.5

19.0

14.0
17
16 .0

.5

18.0

12.5

18.5

17
13.0

.0

17.5
19 .0

13

.5

18.0

16.5
14 . 0

17.0
18
15 .0

.5

16.0
17.5

16.5

15.5

13.5

17.0

12

.5

16.0
17.5

13.5
15 .0

14

.0

16.5

13

.0

15.5
12.5
12.0

13

17.0

.0
16.0
. 13

12.5

12.0
12.5
12

14 .5

13.0

15.0
12.5

12
.0

.5
13.5

15.5

12

14.0

.5

12

14.5

15.0

15

.5

14.5

14.0

13.5

13

.0
12.0
13 .0

14.0

12.5
12 .5 12 .0

13.5

12 .0

13.5

13.0

12.0

12.0

12

.5

13.0

13.5

14.0

28.0

.5

23.5

28.0

27.0

28.0

28.0

23 .0

28.0

20.0
13.5

28.0

17

.5

28.0

16.0

.5

19.5

12 .5

13.0

12 .

12.0

13.0

12.5

12.0

13.0

12.0

12.0

13.5

13.0

25

.0

.0

25

27.5

25.5

28

.0

28.5

29.0
29.0
.0 28

29.0

.0 29
29.0

29 .0

29

.5

29.0

29.0

29.0

.0 29

29 .0

28.0

.0 29

27.5

28.0

12.0

13.0

12.5

13.0

24.5

25.5

.0 18

28.5

13.0

12.5

13

13.5

.0

13

.5 13 .0

14

.0

13 .5

14.0

14.0

14.5

14.0
14.5

28.0

.0 23
27.5

16 .5

14.5

16 .0

28.0

15.5

13 .5
15 .0
14.0

20 .0

22 .5

. 21 0

19 .5

22 .0

.0 17

15 .5

13 .0

20 .5

13 .5

19 .0

.0 15
17 .5 16 .0

18

14 .0
14.5

.5
19 .5

24 .5

18 .0

16 .5

13.5

15 .0
19 .0
17 .5

13.0
14

17 .0

14.0
13.5
14.0

.5

15 .5

24 .5

25.0

.5

.5

.0 13

20 .5

.5

. 12 5
.0

20.0

19

14.5

.5

.5 15

13 .5

13.0 13.5

12.5

18.0

14 .5

0
.0

12 .5

16 .5

16 .0

12 .5

13 .0
12 .5

12.0

15.0

13.0
14.5
13 .0

12 .5
12.0

12 .5

28.5

29

.0

28.5
29 .0

28.5

29

.0

29.0

.5 28

28.5

28

.5

28

.0

28.5

28.5

28.0

28.5

28.0

28.0

28.0

28.5

28.5

28.5

28.0

28 .5

29.0

28

.5

28.5

28.5

28.5

28.0

28.5

28.5

28.0

28.0

28.0

28.0

28.0

29.0
28.5

29

.0

28.0

28.5

28.0

28.5

28 .0

28

.0

28.5
29 .0

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

APPENDIX B Surface Water Runoff Northumbrian Water Limited Sewer Records Greenfield Runoff Calculation Micro Drainage Outputs

Tk

Chy
El Sub Sta Tanks Tank Tank Tanks
Tank

Tanks

Tanks Tank
s Ta nk

s r B ed Filte

Tank

Works
Level Crossing
MP 0.50 SP

Tk

Tanks

Signal Box

33.2m
32.0m

MP 0.75

Urlay Nook

33.5m

Urlay Nook
29.9m

SP SP
SP

34.1m
Def

El Sub Sta

SP

SP Playing Field

Police Tactical
Training Centre

ETL

Scargill

Post
5

9401
1.71

16

21

14

22

9305
1.69 150 PVC
150 PVC

9304
1.63 225 PVC

15

COTHERSTONE CL
9302
1.95 2.01

9303
7

11

19

GRASSHOLM E WAY

150 PVC

15

375 CO

11

29.0m

9301
1.73

9205
1.83

9204
2.20
C PV

2.70

ETL

9203

5 22

PV

0204
2.34
12

2.47

375 CO

Lay-by

0203

LANGD ON

AY9202 1 W 2.15 E LM HO SS 9201 1.73 RA

1

150 PV Sub El Sta C

2.34 C PV 50

WA Y

Lay-by
2

3.59

A 67
7201
3.07

Lay -by

0114
3.83

RS ETTE
45

CL GILL

OSE

150 PVC

Ne

rdo lly Bu

SS

0111
4.41
11

1111 0110
26

2.57
675 CO

4.07

8101
3.68
15

0109
4.74
450 CO

16

14

4.92
150 C PV

9101
5.70
45

N TO ES GL EG
15
11

22

0104

4.72 VC P 0 15 IVE

R ED

150 PV C
1

5.80

PVC 150

225 PVC

0107

1107 0106
4.92 3.00 AV

0105
1.84

0103
7.03

1101

0102
1.72

7.62

225 PVC

Pond
9001
2.92

450 CO

A6 7
9003

0002
1.69

1004

SS

Allotment Gardens
UR LA Y
45 0

DG

2.35

HC

NO OK

RO

1002
AD
Hydrobrake

450 CO

9002
2.68

DG
0 90 C O

TU

EL

1001
7.73

0001
6.70
450

9905
450 CO

O 0C 45

Combined Foul

Pr Hd

Private Highway Drain

Abandoned Manhole

Surface Water Watercourse

Rising Main Backdrop S104

Pumping Stn Adoption Agreement

The material contained on this plot has been reproduced from an Ordnance Survey map with permission of the controller of H.M.S.O. Crown Copyright Reserved. Licence No. WU298506 The information shown on this plan should be regarded as approximate and is intended for guidance only. No Liability of any kind whatsoever is accepted by Northumbrian Water, it's servants or agents for any omission. The actual position of any water mains or sewers shown on the plan must be established by taking trial holes in all cases. In the case of water mains Northumbrian Water must be given two working days notice of their intention to excavate trial holes. Private connections are not shown but their presence should be anticipated. WARNING...Where indicated on the plan there could be abandoned asbestos cement materials or shards of pipe. If excavating in the vicinity of these abandoned asbestos cement materials, the appropriate Health & Safety precautions should be taken. Northumbrian Water accepts no liability in respect of claims, costs, losses or other liabilities which arise as the result of the presence of the pipes or any failure to take adequate precautions. Emergency Telephone Number: 0845 717 1100

Author Title

: THRAG : 3176_S

Date : 30-08-2011 Sheet : NZ4014SW Scale : 1:2500

Centre Point : 440445,514357

LARTINGT ON WAY

12

DG

1102
150

150
C PV 150

PV

PVC

0108

300

PVC

225 PVC

10

eck n's B

Foot Bridge

0112
C 150 PV

1.92

14

25

31

.2 MP

Works

UR LA Y

GRA SS H

62

E W 9403 AY
1.65
225 PVC

OL M

t& ons ro C Bo y Bd rd Wa
FF

56

OK NO AD RO

0409
2.00
22 5 PV C

9402
1.53

150 PV C

0408
1.92

15 0

PV C
150 PVC

0407
2.08
PVC 300
44

0406
1.99

0405
6 71.92

0404
1.96
C 300 PV

42

f De
RH
MID
150 PVC ON T DLE

NEWBIGGIN CLOSE
150 PVC
150 PVC

0403
1.89
300 PVC

0401
1.80

0402
1.75

32

150 PVC

34

375 CO

COTHERSTONE CL
150 PVC

0306
1.97

0305
1.99

0304
2.20
150 PVC

0303
2.28
375 CO

22

0302
2.49
C 150 PV
9
7

0301
2.38

375 CO

11

0209 0205
2.53

C PV 50

2.78 150 PVC

0208
3.21
16

WAY

0 15 E OS PVC CL 225

0 15

C PV

A GR C

P HO 2 2 5 SS

LM

225 PVC VC

0207

0206
5 67 CO
2

0201
5.68

DG

675 CO

0202
3.20

De f
L ET

150 PVC

375 CO

0113
3.70

0101
6.48

450 CO
15 VC 0P

225 PVC

45

0 CO

22 VC 5P

VC 0P

RH

0
O C

OR INTERCEPT

3 No

PVC
7

1650 CO

675 CO

CO

W A Fairhurst & Partners 1 Arngrove Court Barrack Road Newcastle upon Tyne N... Date 25/08/2011 15:43 File QUICK STORAGE 192... Micro Drainage

Page 1 91483 - Urlay Nook Rd Storage Estimate Designed By DR Checked By Source Control W.12.4

Summary of Results for 100 year Return Period (+30%)

Storm Event Max Level (m) 27.842 27.949 28.060 28.171 28.234 28.275 28.324 28.348 28.364 28.372 28.374 28.356 28.324 28.287 28.210 28.134 28.060 27.991 27.929 Max Depth (m) 0.342 0.449 0.560 0.671 0.734 0.775 0.824 0.848 0.864 0.872 0.874 0.856 0.824 0.787 0.710 0.634 0.560 0.491 0.429 Rain (mm/hr) 109.410 71.982 45.240 27.570 20.406 16.405 11.978 9.530 7.991 6.919 5.507 3.987 2.882 2.287 1.649 1.306 1.089 0.939 0.828 Max Control (l/s) 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 Max Volume (m) 658.8 863.8 1077.3 1292.6 1412.9 1491.7 1585.4 1632.8 1662.4 1678.0 1682.1 1648.5 1585.8 1515.6 1366.8 1219.6 1078.5 945.5 826.1 Status

15 30 60 120 180 240 360 480 600 720 960 1440 2160 2880 4320 5760 7200 8640 10080

min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min

Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K

Storm Event 15 30 60 120 180 240 360 480 600 720 960 1440 2160 2880 4320 5760 7200 8640 10080 min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer Summer

Time-Peak (mins) 26 41 70 130 190 248 366 486 604 724 960 1216 1584 1992 2812 3632 4400 5112 5848

1982-2010 Micro Drainage Ltd

W A Fairhurst & Partners 1 Arngrove Court Barrack Road Newcastle upon Tyne N... Date 25/08/2011 15:43 File QUICK STORAGE 192... Micro Drainage

Page 2 91483 - Urlay Nook Rd Storage Estimate Designed By DR Checked By Source Control W.12.4

Summary of Results for 100 year Return Period (+30%)

Storm Event Max Level (m) 27.884 28.004 28.128 28.255 28.326 28.373 28.430 28.460 28.480 28.492 28.500 28.483 28.438 28.389 28.278 28.164 28.052 27.946 27.859 Max Depth (m) 0.384 0.504 0.628 0.755 0.826 0.873 0.930 0.960 0.980 0.992 1.000 0.983 0.938 0.889 0.778 0.664 0.552 0.446 0.359 Rain (mm/hr) 109.410 71.982 45.240 27.570 20.406 16.405 11.978 9.530 7.991 6.919 5.507 3.987 2.882 2.287 1.649 1.306 1.089 0.939 0.828 Max Control (l/s) 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.8 11.8 11.9 11.8 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 Max Volume (m) 738.9 969.4 1209.7 1452.9 1590.0 1680.5 1790.3 1848.3 1886.4 1909.2 1924.9 1892.5 1805.3 1710.6 1498.1 1279.1 1061.9 858.4 691.6 Status

15 30 60 120 180 240 360 480 600 720 960 1440 2160 2880 4320 5760 7200 8640 10080

min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min

Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K

Storm Event 15 30 60 120 180 240 360 480 600 720 960 1440 2160 2880 4320 5760 7200 8640 10080 min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min min Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter Winter

Time-Peak (mins) 26 41 70 128 186 244 360 476 592 706 930 1356 1688 2144 3068 3920 4696 5440 6056

1982-2010 Micro Drainage Ltd

W A Fairhurst & Partners 1 Arngrove Court Barrack Road Newcastle upon Tyne N... Date 25/08/2011 15:43 File QUICK STORAGE 192... Micro Drainage

Page 3 91483 - Urlay Nook Rd Storage Estimate Designed By DR Checked By Source Control W.12.4 Model Details

Storage is

Online

Cover Level (m)

30.000

Tank or Pond Structure

Invert Level (m) Depth (m) 0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1.000 1.200 Area (m) 1925.0 1925.0 1925.0 1925.0 1925.0 1925.0 0.0 Depth (m) 1.400 1.600 1.800 2.000 2.200 2.400 2.600 Area (m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.500 Area (m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Depth (m) 4.200 4.400 4.600 4.800 5.000 Area (m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Depth (m) 2.800 3.000 3.200 3.400 3.600 3.800 4.000

Hydro-Brake Outflow Control

Design Head (m) Design Flow (l/s) Hydro-Brake Type Depth (m) 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600 0.800 1.000 Flow (l/s) 4.7 10.3 11.6 11.4 11.0 10.7 11.0 11.9 Depth (m) 1.200 1.400 1.600 1.800 2.000 2.200 2.400 2.600 1.000 12.0 Md6 SW Only Diameter (mm) Invert Level (m) 143 27.500

Flow (l/s) 12.8 13.8 14.8 15.7 16.5 17.3 18.1 18.8

Depth (m) 3.000 3.500 4.000 4.500 5.000 5.500 6.000 6.500

Flow (l/s) 20.2 21.8 23.3 24.7 26.1 27.4 28.6 29.7

Depth (m) 7.000 7.500 8.000 8.500 9.000 9.500

Flow (l/s) 30.9 32.0 33.0 34.0 35.0 36.0

1982-2010 Micro Drainage Ltd

Urlay Nook Road, Flood Risk Assessment D/I/D/91483/01

Existing Greenfield Runoff Rates The EA/DERFA R&D Technical Report W5-074 Preliminary Rainfall Runoff Management for Developments states that for developments which are less than 200 ha in size the Institute of Hydrology Report 124 (IH124) Flood Estimation for Small Catchments should be used to calculate the peak greenfield runoff rates. The areas being considered are all less than 50 ha; Technical Report W5-074 provides the following advice for this scenario. Where developments are smaller than 50 ha the analysis for determining the peak greenfield discharge rate should use 50 ha in the formula and linearly interpolate the flow rate value based on the ratio of the development to 50 ha. This advice is replicated in The SUDS Manual (CIRIA C697). As described above, the IH124 method uses the following equation to calculate greenfield runoff: QBAR, rural = 0.00108 * AREA0.89 * SAAR1.17 * SOIL2.17 Where: QBAR, rural = Mean Annual Flood (m3/s) AREA = Catchment Area (km2) SAAR = Standard Average Annual Rainfall (mm) SOIL = Soil Index (from Wallingford Procedure maps)

For the area of Workington, the SAAR is taken to be 600 mm and the SOIL value is 0.45. The site area is 6.7 ha, however only 3.33ha is anticipated to be made impermeable as a result of the development. Regional Growth Factors have been obtained from Technical Report W5-074, which have been used to determine peak flows for a range of return periods. For 50 ha QBAR, rural = 0.00108 * 0.500.89 * 6001.17 * 0.452.17 = 0.183 m3/s = 183 l/s QBAR, rural = 183/50 = 3.66 l/s/ha QBAR, rural = 3.66*3.33 = 12.2l/s
Event 1 in 1 year Mean Annual Flood 1 in 30 year 1 in 100 year Growth Factor 0.85 1.00 1.68 2.08 Greenfield Runoff Rate (l/s/ha) 3.1 3.7 6.2 7.6 Allowable Discharge Rate (l/s) 10.3 12.3 20.6 25.3

For 1 ha For 3.33 ha

www.fairhurst.co.uk

Aberdeen Birmingham Bristol Dundee Edinburgh Elgin Glasgow

CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION ROADS & BRIDGES PORTS & HARBOURS GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT WATER SERVICES CDM COORDINATOR SERVICES

Inverness Leeds London Manchester Newcastle upon Tyne Sheffield Watford Wellesbourne