Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Nrb@ N N
1 Z
whcrcVcrb_isanclcmcntlikc5lrkP, Vcrb,anclcmcntwiththcpropcrticsofaSimilarity
Prcdicatc. In thc contcxt of thc discussion of Gcncrativc Scmantics, it is clcar that
thcrcisnosuggcstion thatthcsc undcrlyingvcrbalsarcPXcu lPm5, inparticularnonc
thatthcyarcthclcxical5lrkP, rP5PmP, ctc.Thcidcaisthatthcundcrlyingclcmcntsarc
50muhlc vcrbs, that is, prcdicatcs. Conscqucntly, thc claim is only that thc undcrlying
clcmcnts ofrPmh clauscs arc thosc prcdicatcs which arc lawfully conntcd to thc
various rcgularitics documcntcd for 5lrkP and Similarity Prcdicatcs. In particular, I
would likcto cmphasizcthat itis not cxcludcd that thcactual lcxcal vcrb 5lrkP may
havcccrtainspccialpropcrticsnotassociatcdwiththc undcrlyingprcdicatcorprcdicatc
complcxwhichshowsupasthcSurfaccVcrbrPmhd. Justso,thcparticularprcdicatcof
similarity which undcrlics rPmhd may lack somc ad hoc fcaturcs ofany or all ofthc
vcrbals 5mur, rP5PmP, lkP. Inshort, I havc not intcndcd to claim thatrPmhd is in
any scnsc dcrivcd from undcrlying structurcs which contain thc lcxicalvcrbs 5lrkP, or
rP5PmP/5mur/kP. Rathcr, I havc argucd that thc dcrivaton must bc fromclcmcnts
woscpropcrtics arc hcudPd inthcsclcxical clcmcnts (pp. I I3-I I4).
Thccrucia|notionindiscussionso| primcsandwordsisthato|'rca|ization,`or
'corrcspondcnccto":Eng|ishand,inonco|itsscnscs,rca|izcsthcprimcP?
3
bccausc,
asidc |rom any syntactic or sty|isticpccu|iariticsassociatcdwith thisscnsc o|Eng|ish
and, its propcrticsarcthosco|ancntitywhichbcarsccrtainspccihcrc|ationstoothcr
cntitics (|or cxamp|c, ok, ?L L?L) which, takcn togcthcr, |orm thc basis |or a
scmantic dcscription o| Eng|ish. Among thc rc|ations in gucstion is thc dua|ity o|
P? and okthat P? is cguiva|cnt to ?LLH~?L and, convcrsc|y, that ok is
cguiva|cnt to ?LP?*?L or, statcd prccisc|y, that R P? 5 is cguiva|cnt to
?L ((?L R)LH (?L 5))andthatRLkiscguiva|cntto?L ((?L R)P? (?L 5)).
!ustasonc scnsc o| and corrcspondstoP? so onc scnsc o|similar corrcsponds to
(rca|izcs) LL D8COm8 and -8h corrcspond to ?LLPNL and say corrcsponds to
PbbLH.
3. I . I . 71t 5UB57NCt 71tOR1 IN 71t LI7tR7URt
A runthroughscmanticdcscriptionsin thc|itcraturchasturncdupnoprimcswhich
strikcmcasbcingincapab|c o|rca|izationinaword or amx, inncar|ycvcrycasc, in
|act,thcrcisanobviousEng|ish|cxica|itcmcorrcspondingtothcprimc.Inaddition,it
1 Sh8ll lOllOW lh 0uSlOD Ol uSIDg SD8ll 08Il8l lllIS lOI IIDS 8S 0ODlI8SlU WIlh Il8lI0S
lOI WOIUS OI OIhI lXI08l uDIlS.
4 lhgu5lc5 u5 LhPm5lr}. 1hP u5luhcP 1hPOr} Of Pmuhlc rmP5
s undouotcdIy sgnhcant(asJamcs Hcrngcr has pontcdoutto mc) thatthc factors
govcrnngscIcctonaIrcstrctonsntngIshsccmaIwaystohavccasy "tngIshtrans-
Iatons"~(concrete) object, /eminine, human, actitity, to ctc a fcw. If thcrc s not
ncccssarIy a IcxicaI unit corrcspondng to cach prmc, thcn wc shouId cxpcct to
comcacross"ncxprcssoIcscIcctionaIrcstrctons,whchwouIdrcqurcthcnvcnton
of ncw tcchncaI tcrms for thc purposcs of Ingustc dcscrpton.
AIthough thcrc arcnocxampIcs nowavaIaoIc of scmantc prmcs that arc not
rcaIzaoIc inawordorax,oothKatzandLakohhavctakcnpansnotto subscroc
to thc SuostanccThcory. oth assumcthat thc sct of scmantc prmcs, Ikc thc sctof
phonoIogcaIfcaturcs, s unvcrsaI, out ncthcr s wIIngto asscrt morcthan that thc
sct of prmcs togcthcr s sumccnt to provdc an adcquatc account of thc ntcrnaI
mcanng rcIatonshps n thc Icxcon of any Ianguagc. Katz (i) cvcn suppIcs thc
chcmicaIanaIog:
Itisimportanttostrcssthat,althoughthcscmanticmarkcrsarcgivcninthcorthography
of a naturaI Ianguagc, thcy cannot bc idcntihcd with thc words or cxprcssions ofthc
languagcuscdtoprovidcthcm withsuggcstivclabcIs.Rathcr,thcyarctobcrcgardcd as
constructsofa linguisticthcory,|ustas tcrmssuchas 'forcc' arcrcgardcdas labclsfor
constructs in natural scicncc. Thcrc is an analogy bctwccn thcformula for a chcmical
compoundanda rcading (which maybc thought ofas a formuIaforascmantic com
pound). Thc formulaforthc chcmcal compoundcthylalcohol,
H H
HCC3H
H H
rcprcscnts thcstructurcofanalcohoI moIccuIc ina way anaIogous to that inwhicha
rcading for 'bachcIor' rcprcscnts thc conccptual structurcof onc of itsscnscs. Both
rcprcscntations cxhibit thc clcmcnts out of which thc compound is formcd and thc
rclations that form it. In thc formcr casc, thc formulacmploys thcchcmicalconstructs
'Hydrogcn molcculc', 'Chcmical bond', 'Oxygcn molcculc', ctc. , whiIc in thc Iattcr
thc formuIa cmploys thc linguistic conccpts '(Physical Obcct)', '(MaIc)', '{Sclcction
Rcstriction)', ctc. (p. I 56).
Lako(i7) hndshmscIf askng whcthcr thcrc arc two scmantic prmcs LH
and LL wth ccrtan spcchcdpropcrtcs, hcconcIudcs:
Inanarbitrarysystcm,onccouIdalwaysmakcupsuchprcdicatcs,butthatisbcsidcthc
point. Thc qucstion hcrc is an cmpiricaI onc. Is thcrc any cvidcncc that such atomic
prcdicatcs actually cxist in thc Iogical forms ofscntcnccs of natural Ianguagc? This
docs not ncccssariIy mcan that thcrc must actually bc in somc languagc singlc lcxicaI
itcms dircctly corrcsponding to thcsc prcdicatcs. Howcvcr, it is rcquircd, at thc vcry
Icast, that such prcdicatcs appcar clscwhcrc. For cxamplc, thcrc might bc a numbcr
ofothcrvcrbswhichcanbcdccomposcdintcrmsofoncorthcothcrofthcscprcdicatcs
(p. 35I).
Lakoh docs not cIam that thc Suostancc Thcory is nvaIid, hc mcrcIy wthhoIds
judgmcnt on thc mattcr and proposcs a wcakcr condtion on thc unvcrsaIity of
prmcs. Thc onIy thng that hs condton ruIcs outs thc posting of a prmc on thc
oass of propcrtcs of onc IcxcaI tcm n onc Ianguagc-surcIy a mnimaI constrant
on thc contcntof scmantc thcory.
n onc nstancc, Lakoh(i7) uscs thc cxstcncc of a word corrcspondng to a
putatvcprmcascvdcnccfor thc prmc's cxistcncc. nconncctonwththcproposcd
dccompostonof onc scnsc ofpersuade nto LPLbL?LLPNL?L?, hcwritcs .
NOd . Zwck} 9
Asidcfrom thc ru|cof rcdicatc-iing, a| of thcru|csuscdin this dcrivation and in
simi|ar dcrivations arc nccdcd anyway in Eng|ish grammar. orcovcr, structurcs
|ikcthconcrooscd for]Pr5uudP| arca|sonccdcdindccndcnt|yinEng|ishgrammar.
That is, thcrc must bc a vcrb 'causc" which is a two-|acc rcdicatc, a vcrb 'comc
about" which is a onc-|acc rcdicatc, and a vcrb 'intcnd" which is a two-|acc
rcdicatc (. 342).
I| thcrc wcrc no rcason to supposc that primcs wcrc rca|izcd as words, thcn thc
cxistcncco|avcrbcauseinEng|ishwou|d bcirrc|cvantto thcana|ysiso|persuade as
containing thcprimcLPLb.
Sincc atz and Lakoh do not suggcst any ana|yscs that vio|atc thc Substancc
Thcory, wc must turn to othcrs|or cxamp|cs. Asithappcns, somc rc|cvantworkhas
bccn doncby|ogicians.
J.1.2. LOGICLLY DtQU7t BU7 LINGUI57ICLLY
UNN7URL 5Y57tJ5
It has bccn thc goa| o| |ogic to construct prccisc and satis|ying accounts o| a |cw
arcas o| |orm and mcaning that arc o| indcpcndcnt phi|osophica| or mathcmatica|
intcrcst. Onc o| thc critcria |or satis|action is systcmatic c|cganccparsimony in
primitivc symbo|s or conccpts, in scts o| axioms, and so on. Logicians havc bccn
cxtrcmc|y ingcniousin thcir parsimony. And thcir systcms arc ohcn guitcunnatura|
|inguistica||y. Linguisticjudgmcntso|unnatura|ncss, incombinationwith prcdictions
madc by thc Substancc Thcory, a||ow us to conc|udc that thc |ogician`s primcs
cannotbc|inguistic primcs. I providctwo cascshcrc.
Iirst, wcconsidcrthccxamp|co|thcShchcrstrokc.
A c|assicrcsu|to|symbo|ic
|ogic is that thc |ogica| conncctivcs ~ 'not', &'and`, \ 'or`, ~ 'imp|ics`, and = 'i|
and on|y i| `cana|| bcdchncd |rom oncconncctivc(cithcr onco|twodihcrcntcon-
ncctivcs, in|act). Thisis thc Shchcr strokc j 'notboth . . . and . . . '. Thcrcmaining
conncctivcsarc dchnab|cinscvcra| ways, |orinstancc:
~ F dened as F j F
F \ Q dened as ~ F j ~ Q
F ~ Q dened as ~ F V Q
F & Q dened as ~ ( F \ ~ Q)
F = Q dened as (F ~ Q)& (Q ~ F)
Whatis|inguistica||yintcrcstingaboutthis|ogician`sstratcgyisthatno|anguagc
sccmstohavcaconjunctivcrootnub, with thcpropcrtythatnubBmcans'notboth
A and ', and I wou|d vicw with considcrab|c suspicion any rcport o| a |anguagc
with such a conjunction. I|no|anguagchasa |cxica| unitnub, thcn according to thc
SubstanccThcory, thcShchcrstrokccannotrcprcscntascmanticprimc|or|inguistic,
asopposcd to |ogica|, purposcs.
An cxamp|c o| a somcwhat dihcrcnt typc is providcd by Prior ( I 96O), whosc
objcctisto assai| thcnotion thatthcmcaning o|thcwordand is comp|ctc|ygivcnby
an account o| thcro|cit p|aysindcductions(that |rom F and Q wc can in|crF, that
|romFandQwccanin|crQ,andthat|romFandQwccanin|crFandQ). Hcahccts
toc|aimthatanystatcmcntYcanbcin|crrcd|romanyothcr,X,bycitinganin|crcncc
o|thc|orm.
X
X tonkY
1
" PlDOSI cVcty SI8DU8IU OgI0 IcXI Itc8IS IDIS SuDJc0I Scc, OI cX8Dlc, LOI (1VO!, . Z1).
4 lhgu5lc5 u5 LhPm5lr}. 1hP u5luhcP 1hPOr} O}Pmuhlc rmP5
Prioradds
Thcrcmaywc||bcrcadcrswhohavcnotrcvious|ycncountcrcdthcconunction'tonk',
itbcingacomarativc|yrcccntaddition tothc|anguagcbutitisthcsim|cstmattcrin
thcword tocx|ain what it mcans. ts mcaning is com|ctc|y givcn by thc ru|cs that
(i)fromanystatcmcntPwccaninfcranystatcmcntformcdbyoiningPtoanystatcmcnt
Qby'tonk'. . . andthat(ii)fromany'contonktivc'statcmcntP-tonk-Qwccaninfcrthc
cotaincd statcmcnt Q.
Noton|yistonknota 'comparativc|yrcccntaddition tothc|anguagc,"itisnotpart
o| |anguagc. Conscgucnt|y, according to thc Substancc Thcory, whatcvcr it
might bc, it is no scmantic primc. c|nap(i2) has obscrvcd that thc dchnition o|
tonk isinconsistcnt, thcrcbyproviding an cxp|anation |or itsunnatura|ncss.
Thc point o|cascs|ikc thc twojustconsidcrcdis that thc SubstanccThcorycan
|inkwithobscrvationsaboutwhatsorto| |cxica|itcmsoccurin thc wor|d's|anguagcs
to yic|d prcdictions about possib|c scmantic primcs. Without thc mcdiation o| thc
SubstanccThcory, thcrc is norcason |or thcrc to bca rc|ation bctwccn thc kinds o|
|cxica| units that occur in |anguagcs and thc scmantic primcs that arc proposcd |or
thcm.
.J. JD0 PHOg WlD LD0HSlt
ThcSubstanccThcoryo|ScmanticPrimcs,asIhavca|rcady pointcd out, isana|ogous
to oy|c's rcguircmcnt, in thc 'Sccptica| Chymist" o|i1, that chcmica| c|cmcnts
bciso|ab|csubstaccsandnotabstractprinip|cs.Wchavca|sosccn,inScctionJ.1.i,
Katz's comparison o| scmantic structurc to chcmica| structurc. In this scction I wi||
prcss this ana|ogy |urthcr, with thc intcntion o| using thc chcmica| casc to suggcst
usc|u| |incso|inguiryinthc|inguisticcasc.Thatis,Iwi||bcc|aimingthatthcpara||c|s
bctwccn chcmica| structurcand scmanticstructurcarcdccponcs. Thisisnot to say,
o| coursc, that thc two subhc|ds o| thc dihcrcnt discip|incs arc isomorphic in cvcry
dctai|. I do not anticipatc thc discovcry o| a sct o| dccp princip|cs |rom which thc
propcrticso|chcmica|structurcandthosco|scmanticstructurcwi||bothbcdcrivab|c.
Indccd, thcrc arc aspccts o| cach subhc|d which arc without obviousana|ogs in thc
othcr,|orinstancc,thcrcisnothinginthcchcmica|cascthatisanatura|corrcspondcnt
o|thcphono|ogica|idcntitythatunitcsthctwoscnscso|persuade(LPLbLLLPNL
L and LPLbLLLPNLLLNL) or thc distinct scnscs(cach a scparatc|cxica|
unit) o|many othcrwords.
Thc initia| ana|ogy is o| |anguagc to mattcr. Thc stratcgy o| thc discip|incs,
|inguistics and chcmistry, rcspcctivc|y, is to ana|yzchctcrogcncousphysica|matcria|
(spccch, matcria|s) intoits parts (words, substanccs) and thcn totrcat thcsc partsas
cithcr c|cmcnta| substanccs (scmantic primcs, c|cmcnts) or compounds o| such
c|cmcnta| substanccs. Thcsc ana|ytic prc|iminarics rcguirc thc idcntihcation and
rcmova| o|variouskindso|intrusivc|actors.
Thc ccntra| part o| thc ana|ogy, thcn, is an occurrcncc o| a scmantic primcin
somc|anguagc,onthconchand,andanatomo|somcchcmica|c|cmcnt,onthcothcr.
Corrcspondingto|cxica|cntricsarcmo|ccu|cs. Ccrtainmo|ccu|cs,hydrogcnmo|ccu|cs
|orinstancc, arccomposcdo|on|yoncsorto|atom. Inthcsamcway, ccrtain|cxica|
cntrics, thc cntry |or cause |or instancc, arc composcd o| ony onc sort o| primc.
DtS DU0D Ol lD Il tS 0DOU Dy OSll {1V!, . 111), WDO SKS O SDDlI0
lODS DU SDDlI0 DO0UlS DUl UOS DOl lK lD lIDS lO D DOI lDD StDl DlDOIS.
rhOd A. 2Wcky 4V
Othcr molcculcs, thc sulfuric acid molcculc for onc, posscss anintcrnal structurc i n
which morc than onc sort ofatom (hydrogcn, sulfur, oxygcn) occurs. Just so, somc
lcxicalcntrics,thccntryforkmamongthcm,posscssanintcrnalstructurcwithmorc
than oncsort ofprimc (LPLb LLPN L P1N).
ln both linguistics and chcmistry, thc grcat majority of thc known substanccs
(orwords) arccomplcx. lncachcld, thcnumbcrofactually occurring substanccsis
quitc largc, and thc numbcr of possiblc substanccs is innitc in principlc, though
limitcd in fact by cxtcrnal factors (thc pysical instability of thc molcculcs, thc
psychologicalcomplcxity ofthc words).
Also, inbothlinguisticsandchcmistry, thcrcarc molccularpropcrticswhicharc
"cmcrgcnt,' in thc scnsc thatthcy arc not prcdictablc by known principlcsfromthc
charactcr of thc constitucnts of thc molcculc. road (i2) writcs of a familiar
chcmicalcxamplc:
OxygcnhasccrtainpropcrticsandHydrogcnhasccrtainothcrpropcrtics.Thcycombinc
to form watcr, and thc proportions in whichthcy do this arc hxcd. Nothing thatwc
know about Oxygcn itsclfor in combination with anything but Hydrogcn could givc
us thc lcast rcason to supposc that it could combinc with Hydrogcn at all . . . And
mostofthcchcmicalandphysicalpropcrticsofwatcrhavcnoknownconncxion,cithcr
quantitativcor qualitativc, withthoscofOxygcnand Hydrogcn. Hcrcwchavcaclcar
instanccwhcrc, sofar as wccan tcll, thc propcrtics ofa wholccomposcdoftwocon-
stitcnts could not havc bccn prcdictcd from a knowlcdgc ofthcsc propcrtics takcn
scparatcly, or from this combincd withaknowlcdgcofthcpropcrticsofothcr wholcs
whichcontain thcscconstitucnts(pp. 6263).
Thc linguistic analog is thc aparcnt impossibility of prcdicting thc full rangc of
syntactic propcrtics of a lcxical itcm givcn its dccomposition into primcs. rom
what scmantic analysis of thc vcrb question could onc prcdict that it can bc uscd
pcrformativcly whcn itsdircctobcct is a simplc NP(as in Iquestion thatstatement)
ora whether-cIausc(as in Iquestionwhetherweshoulddo this)butnotwhcnitis any
othcr sort of -clausc (*Iquestionwhere he lites)or a that-clausc (*Iquestion that
hewas responsible)oran -clausc(*Iquestion qweshould do this)?
ln thc quantitativc atomic thcory proposcd by Oalton, it is assumcd that thc
atoms ofthc samc clcmcntarcidcntical, inthc scnscthat thcyhavcidcntical masscs,
andthatatomsofdihcrcntclcmcntshavcdihcrcntmasscs.Thccorrcspondingassump-
tions inscmantics arc that instanccs of thc samc scmantic primc arc associatcd with
thcsamccognitivcmcaning(thatis, thatthccognitivc mcaning ofa scmanticprimcis
invariantacrosslanguagcs)andthatdihcrcntscmanticprimcshavcdihcrcntmcanings.
Thc tasks ofchcmistry arcpartlyanalytica (todcviscmcthodsforisolating and
idcntifying substanccs), partly dcscriptivc (to say what sorts of substanccs occur
andwhatthcirpropcrticsarc),andpartlycxplanatory(togivcanaccountofchcmical
structurc from which thc obscrvcd phcnomcna could bc prcdictcd). Thc analytical
and dcscriptivc aspccts of clcmcntal thcory arc summarizcd wcll in Wccks (18),
fromwhich lconcludcthatscmanticsisafcwhundrcdycars bchindchcmistry simply
in thc mattcr of listing clcmcnts, not to mcntion cxplaining thcir propcrtics. lt is as
ifwcwcrcrcaly surc of only a dozcn orsochcmical clcmcnts. Scmantics has hadno
Mcndclccv to organizc thc clcmcnts in a pcriodic tablc according to thcir salicnt
common propcrtics, and thc linguistic analog of thc ohr atom, from which thc
groupingsin thcpcriodictablccould bc prcdictcd, isscarcclyimaginablc.
lfthc structuralanalogybctwccnchcmistry andscmanticsisdccp, what sortsof
dcvclopmcnts canwccxpcctinscmantics!Thrcc, at lcast . thc discovcry of isotopcs,
4J lhgu5lc5 u5 LhPm5lr}. 1hP u5luhcP 1hPOr} Of Pmuhlc rmP5
a thcoryo|va|cncc,andthc hypothcsiso|subatomicstructurc. Ibc|icvcthatthcrcarc
indications that a|| thrcc o| thcsc cxpcctations arc mct.
irst, thcrc is thc mattcr o| isotopcs. Thc discovcry o| dihcrcnt atoms o| thc
'samc" c|cmcnt with dihcrcnt masscs (and cvcn o| atoms o| 'dihcrcnt" c|cmcnts
with thc samc mass) is an obvious cmbarrassmcnt |or a thcory which takcs an in-
variant mass to bc critcrial |or a givcn c|cmcnt. Thc cxistcncc o| isotopcs, cspccia||y
thosc which (|ikc |ight and hcavy hydrogcn) havc guitc distinct propcrtics, makcs
thcstudyo|subatomicstructurcincvitab|c.Whatarcthcscmanticana|ogso|isotopcs?
Thcyarcoccurrcnccs o|thc 'samc" scmantic primc with dihcrcntmcanings.!ustthis
sort o| situation is cxhibitcd by |cxica| itcms which arc 'dcnotativc|y" distinct but
do not dihcr in any indcpcndcnt|y motivatcd scmantic |caturc; thcsc arc tcrms |or
corrc|ativc spccics, |or cxamp|c rose, chrysanthemum, and pansy, or snap, crackle,
thud, and rumble. (Thc |attcr sct o| cascs is |rom thc discussion in Lccch (1,
pp.8~8).)Itisnatura|tosaythatthcsctwosctso|itcmsrcprcscnton|ytwoscmantic
primcs(sec|||c) |ok and Ma a (sec|||c) No|s-and that thc individua|
|xica|itcmsdihcr subatomica||y.
Ncxt,wcturntoathcoryo|va|cncc,ascto|combinatoryprincip|cs|orscmantic
primcs. Among thcsc princip|cs in scmantics arc conditions stating that a ccrtain
prcdicatc 'takcs" somany argumcnts, o|suchandsucha typc thcsconditionshavc
bccn much studicd by i||morc ((i7), |or cxamp|c), among othcrs. A|so rc|cvant
hcrc arc conditionsgovcrningthccmbcdding o|onc S in anothcrthc dccpstructurc
constraints o| Pcr|muttcr (i71), rcstrictions on thc occurrcncc o| spccia| c|asscs o|
prcdicatcs, such as thc stativc and activity prcdicatcs, constraints against ccrtain
prcdicatcs cmbcddingthcmsc|vcs(*:kv to :kv, *|N:ND to |N:ND), and thc|ikc.
ina||y, thcrc is subatomic s
and
aroorcuIturaI rcscarchwII notcIucdatc prooIcms ofdcrvcdconsttucntstructurc.
Toroundoutthsdscusson,IwIIcontrastsomcnstanccofmcrcIymctaphorcaI
wrtng wth cxampIcs of morc IIumnatng anaIogcs, choosng now nontrans-
formatonaI IIustratons.
orthcunsatsfyngcascs,I havc scIcctcd dcas of two ofthcmostorgnaIand
nprng tradtonaI grammarans, Iorccn and Jcspcrscn. Lotz (1) summarzcs
Iorccn's thcory ofthcstructurc ofgrammar as foIIows:
Thus,grammarshouldhavcthrccbranchcs,cachofwhichshouldvicwthccntircspcch
phcnomcnonfromaspccialanglc.]hOhOOg}, whichshouldtrcat thcarticulatcdsound,
5PmOOg}, which should dcal with thclinguisticallyformcd psychologicalcontcnt , and
mOr]hOOg}, whichshouldaccountforthcwayinwhichthcsoundmatcrialisformcdto
cxprcssthcscmanticcontcnt.Hcattcmptcdtoclucidatcthcscdistinctionsbyanalogics,
c.g.,accrtainob|cctcanbcrcgardcdasapicccofbonc(matcrial),havingthcshapcofa
cubc (contcnt), and scrving as a dicc (form) , or, as a building composcd of bricks
(matcrial),in Moorishstylc(contcnt),andscrvingas acaf (form). Butthcscanalogics
arcrathcrfar-fctchcd andnotvcryilluminating (pp. 5859).
AndMcCaIcy (i7o) attacksJcspcrscn'spoctc attcmpts n naly|ic 5yn|ax(i,
pp. i212i) to dstngushthc notons "ncxus' and "juncton':
In, his charactcrizations ofncxus and|unction rcst hcavily on analogics which I
hnduncnlightcning (p. 47).
Comparcthc corrcspondng anaIogcs n Jcspcrscn (i24):
Comparisons,ofcoursc,arcalwaystosomccxtcntinadcquatc,still asthcscthingsarc
vcryhardtocxprcssinacomplctclylogicalorscicntihcway,wcmaybcallowcdtosay
that thc way in which thc ad|unct is|oincd to its primaryislikc thc way in which thc
nosc andthccarsarchxcd onthchcad,whilcanadncx rcstsonits primaryas thchcad
onthctrunkoradooronthcwall.A|unctionishcrclikcapicturc,ancxuslikcaproccss
or drama (p. 116).
In thc samc work,Jcspcrscn strvcs to account for thc rcIatonshps of modcrs oy
mcans of an anaIogyIcss strkngthan hc had hopcd t wouId oc:
. . . itisrcallymostnaturalthatalcssspccialtcrmisuscdinordcrfurthcrtospccializc
whatisalrcadytosomccxtcntspccial .thcmcthodofattainingahighdcgccofspccializa-
tion isanalogous tothatofrcachingthcroofofabuildingbymcans ofladdcrs . ifonc
laddcrwillnotdo,youhrsttakcthctallcstladdcryouhavcandticthcsccondtallcstto
thctopofit,andifthatisnotcnough,youticonthcncxtinlcngth,ctc.Inthcsamcway,
PlIDOugD 1 C8DDOI ISISI OIDIIDg OuI ID8I SIIuCIuIS ID VIO8IIOD Ol UIIV8IIOD8 CODSII8IDIS
arcID 8D8lOgS Ol ICS Ol ailIIuIDU lO ID SDUI.
42 lhguSlcS uS LhcmSll}. 1hc uSluhcc 1hcOl} O}cmuhlc lmcS
if wdOw is not sccia|cnough, you add]OOl, which is |csssccia| than wdOw, andyct,
ifit is addcd, cnab|cs you to rcach farthcr in sccia|ization, ifthat docs not succ,
you add thc subunct 0cl}, which in itsc|fis much morc gcncra| than]OOl (. I08).
lor an instacc of a morc productivc ana|ogy, considcr thc para||c| bctwccn
rcp|accmcntofvocabu|ary itcms ina|anguagcovcr timc andthcdccayofradioactivc
c|cmcnts,apara||c|hrstcmphasizcdbySwadcshanddiscusscdc|car|ybyLccs(I 953) .
Thcmcmbcrsofthcchoscn subsctmaybc|ikcncdtothc(indistinguishab|c)atomsin a
givcnmass ofaradioactivcc|cmcnt. Sincc thc ratc of disintcgration is rcdictab|c at
anytimcduring obscrvation ofthcsam|c,thcmass(ornumbcrofrcmainingatoms)of
thcc|cmcntrcmainingamongthcdccay roducts atany timc inthcsam|cisamcasurc
ofhow |ong thc sam|chas bccn dccaying. Thc ana|ysis ofdccay roducts in mincra|
sam|cs crmits thc ca|cu|ation of thc agc of thc carth's crust. Simi|ar|y, ana|yscs of
morhcmc dccay roducts shou|d rovidc an abso|utc chrono|ogy for |cxica| history
(. I I 3-I I 4).
This ana|ogy turns out to havc scvcra| fau|ts . morphcmc dccay probab|y docs not
procccd at a constant ratc, and, cvcn ifit did, thc rcsu|ting cstimatcs of abso|utc
chrono|ogics wou|d orma||y not bc cxact cnough for ordinary |inguistic purposcs.
Ncvcrthc|css,thc ana|ogyisc|osc cnough to havc inspircd somc i mportant rcscarch,
and in spccia| cascs g|ottochrono|ogica|mcthodsarc sti|| uscfu|.
Ana|ogicsofmanykindswcrcafancyofninctccnth-ccnturywritcrson|anguagc.
In thc fo||owing passagc, Whitncy (I 867) spokc morc tru|y than hc cou|d havc
known.
Thcrc is a yct c|oscr ara||c|ism bctwccn thc |ifc of|anguagc and that ofthc anima|
kingdomingcncra|.Thcsccchofcachcrson is, asit wcrc, an individua| ofasccics,
with itsgcncra| inhcritcd conformity to thc sccihc tyc, but a|so with its individua|
ccu|iaritics, itstcndcncytovariationand thcformationofancwsccics. Thcdia|ccts,
|anguagcs,grous,fami|ics,stocks,sctubythc|inguisticstudcnt,corrcsondwiththc
varictics,sccics,gcncra,andsoon,ofthczo|ogist.Andthcucstionswhichthcstudcnts
ofnaturcarcsocxcitcd|ydiscussingatthcrcscntdaythcnaturcofsccihcdistinctions,
thc dcrivation ofsccics by individua| variation and natura| sc|cction, thc unity of
origin ofanima| |ifc~a|| arc c|osc|y akin with thosc which thc |inguistic studcnt has
constantoccasiontotrcat.cnccdnothcrcdwc||furthcruonthccomarisonitisso
natura||y suggcstcd, and so fruitfu| ofintcrcsting and instructivc ana|ogics, that it has
bccn rccatcd|ydrawn out and cm|oycd, bystudcnts bothofnaturc and of|anguagc
(. 46-47).
Whitncy citcs Lyc|| and Sch|cichcrasadditiona|proponcnts ofthc proportion
spccics . varicty |anguagc . dia|cct
andofthcrc|atcdpara||c|s bctwccngcncticc|assihcationin|inguistics andbio|ogica|
taxonomy, a|though Whitncy ncvcrthc|css castigatcs Sch|cichcr for attcmpting 'to
provc by thisproportion`s aid thc truth ofthc Oarwinian thcory, ovcr|ooking thc
factthat thc rc|ation bctwccn thc two c|asscs ofphcnomcna is onc ofana|ogy on|y,
notofcsscntia| agrccmcnt" (p. 47).
Infact,thcana|ogyisadccponc.Thcrcisapopu|ationofindividua|s,whovary
in a numbcr of charactcristics (|inguistic or morpho|ogica|). Thc individua|s form
thcmsc|vcsintoanumbcrofgroupsonthcbasisofthcirsimi|aritics.Thcrcisa|soan
abi|ityforccrtainpairsofindividua|stointcractinaspccia|way,ifthcyarcbrought
D SSg IS SDUWI0DU DlWD D DlOgy IllIDg IDguISlI0 DISlOIy DU OIgDI0 gIOWlD
DU U0y DU OD SSO0IlIDg IlII SlgS Ol lDgUg WIlD gOOgI0l SlIl.
N0d . Zwck} 4J
togcthcr. (Thcir spccch is mutua||y intc||igib|c, in thc |inguistic casc, or thcy can
(intcr)brccd,inthcbio|ogica|casc.)Thcintcractivcabi|ityisthcnuscdscicntihca||yasa
ncccssary and sumcicnt tcst |or dctcrmining groups within thc popu|ation. (In thc
|inguistic casc, mutua| intc||igibi|ity is uscd as a stringcnt critcrion |or a uhuu8,
and in thc bio|ogica| casc, abi|ity to intcrbrccd isuscd as a stringcnt critcrion |or a
spccics.)
Scvcra| dcvc|opmcnts o| thcsc notions can bc prcdictcd. Iirst, it wi|| |rcgucnt|y
not bc possib|c to bring togcthcr thc appropriatc pairsin ordcr to tcstrc|ationships.
Thus, bio|ogica| spccimcnsmay bcdcad, orgcographica||yscparatcd, orcco|ogica||y
scparatcd; |anguagcs ma bc dc|unct or|ar-Dung. In both hc|ds, thc conscgucnccis
thc dcvc|opmcnt o|anindcpcndcnt notion o|rc|ationship, onc bascd so|c|y onthc
charactcristics.Inthccasco|bio|ogy, thisisthc'morpho|ogica|" spccics, asopposcd
tothc'bio|ogica|`spccics(scc, intcruu, Cain(I 954)). In thccasc o||inguistics, this
isthc Stammbaum princip|c o|gcnctic c|assihcation, asopposcd to a socio|inguistic
c|assihcation. Thcncw, or 'strict," thcoryiscasi|y sccn to bcunsatis|actorybccausc
thc charactcristics wi|| showa considcrab|c dcgrcc o|indcpcndcncc, hcncc, aWc||cn-
thcoricin |inguisticsand a thcory o| dihusion o| charactcrs through gcnc poo|s in
bio|ogy.
Anothcr, |css prcdictab|ccharactcristic o| thcsystcms wc arc considcring isthat
thc stringcnt critcrion turns out not to charactcrizc a transitivc rc|ation. That is,
cvidcnccwi|| ariscindicating that thc critcrion is notncccssary butmcrc|y sumcicnt.
Inthccasco|bio|ogy,wchavcanima| chainsinwhich cachanima|canbrccdwiththc
anima|s in thc adjoining tcrritory, a|though thc anima|s at thc cxtrcmcs cannot
intcrbrccd (a rcadab|c cxposition occurs in Oobzhansky ( I 955, Chaptcr 8)) in thc
casco|a'spccics" o|gu||ssurrounding thcNorth Po|c, thccxtrcmcshappcn tooccur
inthcsamcarcaandcannotintcrbrccd. Thc|inguisticana|ogicsarcwc||-known cascs
whcrc groups o| spcakcrs hnd thcir dia|cct mutua||yintc||igib|cwith thcirncighbors'
butthccxtrcmcdia|cctsarcnotmutua||yintc||igib|c. Indccd, knowingthc casco|thc
gu||s, wcmighthavcbccnab|ctoprcdictthccxistcncco|prob|cmatica|dia|cctchains.
Thcana|ogy bctwccn |inguistic and bio|ogica| c|assihcation is a systcmatic onc
inmostrcspccts, thcrcisa point-to-point corrcspondcnccbctwccnthctwohc|ds. Thc
c|aim madc in this papcr is that thc corrcspondcncc bctwccn scmantic and chcmica|
structurc is o| thc samc sort.