SWS Enterprise Survey On Corruption 2012

The TAG 2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
Public Presentation September 19, 2012 9:00am-1:00pm SGV Hall, AIM Conference Center, Makati City
Partial Results as of 14 September 2012
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
A. Survey Design B. Survey Results 1) PUBLIC SECTOR CORRUPTION 2) SINCERITY IN FIGHTING CORRUPTION 3) GOVERNMENT EFFORTS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION 4) PROSECUTION OF HIGH PROFILE CORRUPTION CASES 5) ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE 6) TRANSACTIONS WITH GOVERNMENT 7) PRIVATE SECTOR CORRUPTION 8) BUSINESS EFFORTS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION 9) HONEST BUSINESS PRACTICES 10) THE BUSINESS CLIMATE C. Summary of Findings
TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION
SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

TAG 2012_Survey of Enterprises for 19 Sep Presentation.pptx/LABUCAY
THE SWS SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES, 2000 TO 2012 a. Are Time Series 10 rounds in National Capital Region (2000-09, 2012) 7 rounds in Metro Cebu & Metro Davao (2004-09, 2012) 5 rounds in Cavite-Laguna-Batangas and Cagayan de Oro-Iligan (2005-07; 2009, 2012) 1 round in Metro Angeles & Metro Iloilo (2012) b. Are Stratified by Size 2/3 weight: Small & Medium Enterprises 1/3 weight: Large Enterprises.
THE SWS SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES, 2000 TO 2012: SURVEY DATES AND SAMPLE SIZES
Fieldwork Dates Aug 14 Oct 26 2000 Sep 4 Dec 4 2001 Oct 25 Feb 25 2002/03 Nov 13 Jan 28 2003/04 Jan 21 Mar 15 2005 Feb 18 Apr 27 2006 Mar 4 May 11 2007 Sep 9 Oct 10 2008 Nov 3 Dec 5 2009 Jul 16 Sep 7 2012 Total TotalArea Sample NCR 604 NCR 505 NCR 500 NCR/Ceb/Dav 701 NCR/CLB/Ceb/Dav/CDO-I 701 NCR/CLB/Ceb/Dav/CDO-I 700 NCR/CLB/Ceb/Dav/CDO-I 703 NCR/Ceb/Dav 402 NCR/CLB/Ceb/Dav/CDO-I 550 7 areas (target 950) 826 226 100 100 100 100 100 100 Large 204 200 214 285 232 231 233 135 184 281 82 33 33 33 33 33 33 Small & Medium 400 305 286 416 469 469 470 267 366 545 144 67 67 67 67 67 67
Error Margin 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% 3% 7% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
NCR: National Capital Region (target 350) Ang: Metro Angeles (new) CLB: Cavite-Laguna-Batangas Ilo: Metro Iloilo (new) Ceb: Metro Cebu Dav: Metro Davao CDO-I:Cagayan de Oro/Iligan City

THE SWS SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES, 2000 TO 2012: A partial-panel design

Total 2012 interviews Also interviewed in previous survey (2009) Newly interviewed in in 2012
7 Areas NCR METRO ANGELES CALABA METRO ILOILO METRO CEBU METRO DAVAO CDO-I
826 226 100 100 100 100 100 100
495 145 76 99 100 75
331 81 100 24 100 1 0 25
The SWS May 24-27, 2012 National Survey of Adults also has corruption items
Fieldwork Dates May 24-27 May 24-27 May 24-27 May 24-27 May 24-27 Sample Sizes 1,200 300 300 300 300 Error Margins 3% 6% 6% 6% 6%
PHILIPPINES : Metro Manila Balance Luzon Visayas Mindanao : : : :

1) PUBLIC SECTOR CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, 2000 TO 2012

2 10 19 25 29 26 28 28 33 31 32 45 4 1 10 2 6 1 5 1 5 0.3 5 1 4 1 3 0.2 None 13
A little
Some
77
63 60 65 66 67 61 64 64 42
A lot
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05*** '06*** '07*** '08**
'09*** '12****

ENTERPRISES SAYING THERE IS A LOT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 70 64 51 42 27 39 33 63 57 47 46 40 2012
66 56
All areas
NCR
ANG
CLB
ILO
CEB
DAV
CDO-I
ENTERPRISES VS. GEN. PUBLIC: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, 2012
Enterprises
A little None 0.2% 13% 42% A little 5% 11% 51%
Gen. Public
None
Some
45%
A lot
33%
Some
A lot
10

ENTERPRISES: LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT WHERE CORRUPTION HAPPENS, 2009 and 2012

Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector 93 81 65 76 2009 2012 72 52
67
48
National government
City/municipal government
Provincial government
Barangay government
Q32. Among the different levels of government, where do you think corruption happens? Is it at the? (MULTIPLE RESPONSE ALLOWED)
11
ENTERPRISES: LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WHERE CORRUPTION HAPPENS THE MOST, 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector Middle- level managers
70%
Supervisors
60%
Cabinet-level/top-level management officials
54%
Rank and file employees
49%
12

ENTERPRISES: PERCEIVED NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS THAT GIVE BRIBES TO WIN PUBLIC SECTOR CONTRACTS, 2000 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector
11 8 24 10 8 25 12 7 23 11 7 24 13 17 14 9 15 11 14 7 18 9
None
7
25
8
27
Hardly any
27
28
29 31
Few
32
41
35
34
33 30
30
30
30 26
Most Almost all
23 '00*
15 '01*
22 '02*
23 '03**
21
17
18
15 '08**
18
15
'05*** '06*** '07***
'09*** '12****
13
ENTERPRISES: MEDIAN PERCENTAGE OF CONTRACT ALLOTED AS BRIBE FOR PUBLIC SECTOR CONTRACT, 2000 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say Companies in Their Sector Allot a Percentage for Bribes to Win Public Sector Contracts 2005*** 2006*** 2007*** 2008** 2009*** 2012**** 15% 20 20 20 20 20
Q36. In instances when bribery happens, what percentage of an average contract is allotted for bribes to win public sector contracts?
14

ENTERPRISES: WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME ONE HAD PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF PUBLIC SECTOR CORRUPTION IN OWN SECTOR OF BUSINESS, 2006 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector
25 28 12 14 10 13 25 '06*** 15 13
27
31
34
>1 yr ago 6-12 mos. ago 4-6 mos. ago 2-3 mos. ago Last month
12 14 13 10 12 14 23 '09*** 13 10 11 21 '12****
29
29
'07***
'08**
15
ENTERPRISES: WHETHER CORRUPTION IS WRONG BECAUSE IT IS IMMORAL OR BECAUSE IT HURTS THE COUNTRYS DEVELOPMENT, 2000 TO 2012
1
11
Both [volunteered] Corruption hurts the countrys development
19 55 49 56 63
47
49
41
32
45
41
50 36
Corruption is immoral
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'12****
16

ENTERPRISES VS. GENERAL PUBLIC: COMPARING THE DEGREE OF GRAFT AND CORRUPTION UNDER PNOY ADMIN VS PGMA ADMIN, 2012
Base: Those who say there is corruption in the public sector
Enterprises
More now Same as before 25% Less now 71% 29% Same as before
Gen. Public
More now
3%
5%
Less now 64%
17
ENTERPRISES VS. GENERAL PUBLIC: EFFECTIVENESS OF THE STEPS TAKEN BY PNOY ADMIN TO ERADICATE GRAFT AND CORRUPTION, 2012
Base: Those who say there is corruption in the public sector
Enterprises
Not at all effective Very effective Hardly effective 19% 65% Somewhat effective 3% 13% Hardly effective
Gen. Public
Not at all effective Very effective 6% 16% 25% 52% Somewhat effective
18

2) SINCERITY IN FIGHTING CORRUPTION
19
ENTERPRISES: EXCELLENT SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+81
+70 +50 +30 +10
+10
Office of the President
-10
-15
-3
-30
-27 -37 TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION
20
10

ENTERPRISES: VERY GOOD SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+70 +50
+40
+60
+54 +37 +42 +38
+59
+30 +10
+32 +30 +26
-10 -30
Dept. of Health
Dept. of Trade and Industry
21
ENTERPRISES: GOOD SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+50
+49 +38 +38
+30
Dept. of Education
+11
Senate
+22
+10 +3
+10
+7 0 -1 -7 -6 -13 -17
+9 +5 +4
+10
-8
Office of the Ombudsman

22
11

ENTERPRISES: MODERATE SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012 (1/2)

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+50
Dept. of Interior & Local Government +27

+19 +13+14
+35+35 +27 +26 +22
+30
+27
+24
+10
+5
+8
-10
Sandiganbayan
-17 -18 -23 -25 -32
Your City/ Municipal govt
-30
23
ENTERPRISES: MODERATE SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012 (2/2)

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+50
+48
+45 +40 +40 +37
Dept. of Budget & Management +23

+24
Dept. of Trans & Comm.
+30
+22 +10
+5
+10
0
-10
Supreme Court
-7 -13
-17
-22
-30
-27 -30
24
12

ENTERPRISES: NEUTRAL SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+10
Dept. of Envt & Nat. Resources

+1
House of Representatives -2
Philippine National Police
-10
-18-17 -23 -25 -23 -28 -34 -39 -44 -32 -40 -34 -36 -42
-8
-30
-41
-50
25
ENTERPRISES: POOR SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
Commission on Elections
Bureau of Internal Revenue
Dept. of Public Works & Highways
Land Transportation Office
-10
-8
-14
-30
-27 -36
-18 -23
-31-32 -38 -45 -49 -59-58 -56-57 -55 -66-66 -63 -65 -39
-26
-50
-59
-70
26
13

ENTERPRISES: BAD SINCERITY RATING IN 2012

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
Bureau of Customs
0 -10
-30
-50
-45
-70
-75 -74
-68
-72
-69
27
3) GOVERNMENT EFFORTS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION
28
14

ENTERPRISES: THE GOVERNMENT CAN BE RUN WITHOUT CORRUPTION OR CORRUPTION IS PART OF THE WAY THE GOVT WORKS, 2000 TO 2012
43
42
44
40
40
43
50
56
50
41
Corruption is part of the way govt works
55
57
56
60
60
56
49
44
50
59
The govt can be run without corruption
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
29
ENTERPRISES VS. GENERAL PUBLIC: WHETHER CORRUPTION IS PART OF THE WAY GOVT WORKS OR THE GOVT CAN BE RUN WITHOUT IT, 2012
Enterprises
Gen. Public
41% 59%
33% 65%
30
15

ENTERPRISES ON IT IS NOW EASIER FOR ANYONE WHO WANTS TO BID ON A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT TO GET INFORMATION ABOUT THE BIDDING, 2007 TO 2012
23 26 26 17
Disagree
22 21 16 19
Undecided
Agree
54 57 53 59
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
*NET Agreement: % Agree minus % Disagree.
31
4) PROSECUTION OF HIGH-PROFILE CORRUPTION CASES
32
16

ENTERPRISES: OPINION ON THE CURRENT PACE OF THE TRIAL OF SELECTED CORRUPTION CASES IN GOVT, 2012
Might not Carefully succeed, done moving at TOO QUICKLY RIGHT PACE MUCH TOO SLOW
Graft vs PGMA: NBN-ZTE Graft vs Ben Abalos: NBN-ZTE Graft vs Mike Arroyo: allegedly anomalous PNP helicopter sale Malversation of funds vs ex-PAGCOR Chair Genuino: Donated rice Perjury and Falsification of Public Docs vs V. Garcillano: Hello Garci Plunder vs Maj. Gen. Garcia
17
28
55
16
29
55
12
22
65
26
64
11
80
22
70
33
ENTERPRISES: THE ON-GOING TRIALS OF SOME CORRUPTION CASES ARE CONDUCTED FAIRLY OR UNFAIRLY, 2012
FAIR NEITHER FAIR NOR UNFAIR 75 UNFAIR 19 5
Plunder vs Maj. Gen. Garcia Graft vs Mike Arroyo: allegedly anomalous PNP helicopter sale Perjury and Falsification of Public Docs vs V. Garcillano: Hello Garci Graft vs Ben Abalos: NBN-ZTE Malversation of funds vs ex-PAGCOR Chair Genuino: Donated rice Graft vs PGMA: NBN-ZTE
71
23
70
23
67
26
67
27
66
24
10
34
17

5) ENTEPRISES SOLICITED FOR BRIBE
35
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR BRIBE, 2012

48 30 26 19 17 14 13 6
Any of seven listed bribes
Getting local govt permits/licenses

Assessment/payment of income taxes Getting national govt permits/ licenses Complying with import regulations incl. payment of import duties Supplying govt with goods/ services
Collecting receivables from govt Availing of govt incentives

36
18

ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR ANY OF SEVEN LISTED BRIBES, 2005 TO 2012

68 61 57 61 71 60 48
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
37
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: GETTING LOCAL GOVT PERMITS/LICENSES, 2000 TO 2012
55 54 50 41 40 49
36
33
32
30
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
38
19

ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: ASSESSMENT/PAYMENT OF INCOME TAXES, 2000 TO 2012

52 50 46 43 39 33 30 29 26 40
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05*** '06*** '07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
39
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: GETTING NATIONAL GOVT PERMITS/ LICENSES, 2000 TO 2012
47 42 37 34 28 28 29 37 32
19
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
40
20

ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: COMPLYING WITH IMPORT REGULATIONS INCL. PAYMENT OF IMPORT DUTIES, 2000 TO 2012
31 21 22 25 27
17
10
18 13
17
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
41
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: SUPPLYING GOVT WITH GOODS/ SERVICES, 2000 TO 2012
29 22 15 18 14 15 16 18 14 22
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
42
21

ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: COLLECTING RECEIVABLES FROM GOVT, 2000 TO 2012
24 18 13 9 8 11 20 16 20 13
'00*
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
43
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: AVAILING OF GOVT INCENTIVES, 2000 TO 2012
22 11 13 14 6 '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
10
6 '00* 4 '01* '02*
10 5
'03**
44
22

ENTERPRISES: REPORTING OF BRIBE-SOLICITATION, 2005 to 2012

Base: Those Who Were Solicited for a Bribe
92
93
89
86
91
91
Did not report bribe-solicitation
8 '05***
7 '06***
11 '07***
14 '08**
9 '09***
9 '12****
Reported bribe-solicitation
45
ENTERPRISES: PART OF THE COMPANY THAT IS MOST VULNERABLE TO BRIBERY, 2012

Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Rank 1 (Most vulnerable) Rank 6 (Least vulnerable)
Procurement Sales & marketing Top management Finance Logistics 5 8 12 10 24 11 21 6 19
48 24 9 9 18 19 27 12
15 19 29 20 17 22
10 12
7 7
5 3
11 9 7
Human resource mgt 1 4
46
23

6) TRANSACTIONS WITH GOVERNMENT
47
ENTERPRISES: TRANSPARENCY OF TRANSACTION PROCEDURES OF THE CITY/MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OFFICES, 2009 AND 2012
5 22
2
23
Definitely Not Transparent Somewhat Not Transparent
58
58
Somewhat Transparent
16
15
Definitely Transparent
'09***
'12****
48
24

ENTERPRISES: WHETHER THE PROCESS OF BUSINESS PERMITS/LICENSES RENEWALS IS EASIER OR HARDER NOW THAN 3 YEARS AGO, 2009 AND 2012
4 11 3 9
Much harder Somewhat harder now Not changed
28
31
38
Somewhat easier now

37
19 '09***
19 '12****
Much easier now
49
ENTERPRISES: WILLINGNESS TO PAY TWICE AS MUCH TO DOUBLE THE VALIDITY PERIODS OF GOVT ISSUED LICENSES/PERMITS, 2012
Not willing at all 22% 40% 16% Not much willing 23%
Very much willing
Somewhat willing
Q62. How willing are you to pay twice as much to double the validity periods of government issued licenses/permits?
51
25

7) PRIVATE SECTOR CORRUPTION
52
ENTERPRISES: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, 2000 TO 2012

4 3 3 8 5 5 5 5
None
43
44
41 49
48
53
53
52
48
44
A little
39
44
43 34 37 34 34 35 36 37
Some
14 '00*
9
'01*
13 '02*
9 8 8 '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09***
10
11 '12****
A lot
53
26

ENTERPRISES VS. GEN. PUBLIC: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, 2012
Enterprises
None 8% 11% 37%
Gen. Public
None A little 7% 38%
A lot
16%
44% A little
A lot
37%
Some
Some
54
ENTERPRISES: NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN THE SAME LINE OF BUSINESS THAT GIVE BRIBES TO WIN PRIVATE SECTOR CONTRACTS, 2000 TO 2012
8 20 7 17 7 16 10 18 11 16 14 20 12 20 13 19 12 16 10 18
None Hardly any
47
48
46
46
46 45 46 45
47
42
Few
18 6 '00*
23 5 '01*
25 5 '02*
20 6 '03**
21 6 '05***
16 6 '06***
17 5 '07***
17 5 '08**
19 4 '09***
23 6 '12****
Most
Almost all
55
27

ENTERPRISES: MEDIAN PERCENTAGE OF CONTRACTS ALLOTED AS A BRIBE FOR A PRIVATE BUSINESS CONTRACT, 2000 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say Companies in Their Sector Allot Percentage of Contract for Bribes to Win Private Sector Corruption 2000* 10% 2001* 15 2002/03* 10 2003/04** 10 2005*** 10 2006*** 10 2007*** 10 2008** 10 2009*** 10 2012**** 10
Q43. In instances when bribery happens, what percentage of an average contract is allotted for bribes to win private business contracts?
56
8) BUSINESS EFFORTS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION
57
28

ENTERPRISES ON: A PERSON LIKE ME CANNOT DO ANYTHING TO REDUCE CORRUPTION IN THE GOVERNMENT, 2007 TO 2012
67
61
61
66
Disagree
4
29 '07***
6
28 '12****
Undecided Agree
33
33
'08**
'09***
NET Disagreement computed as % Disagree minus % Agree.
58
ENTERPRISES: EXPECTED CHANGE IN NET INCOME, IF CORRUPTION IS REDUCED TO THAT OF SINGAPORE, 2001 TO 2012
13 1 32 7 2 31 8 3 29 11 5 27 8 5 30 7 4 5 3 7 5 Not aware 10 4 Negative change No change
37
41
37
33
53
60
60
57
56
52
50
51
52
Positive change
'01*
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
59
29

ENTERPRISES: CONTRIBUTION TO PAY TO FUND A PROGRAM THAT WOULD HALVE PUBLIC-SECTOR CORRUPTION IN 10 YEARS, 2000-2012
% willing to contribute 2000* 2001* 2002/03* 2003/04** 2005*** 2006*** 2007*** 2008** 2009*** 2012**** 61 70 74 71 77 72 65 72 71 68 Among willing to contribute: median % of net income willing to contribute 3% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
60
ENTERPRISES: SPENDING IN THE LAST 2 YEARS TO COMBAT FRAUD AND CORRUPTION IN OWN COMPANY, 2007 to 2012
6 3 4 6 10 9 5 3 6 5 9 11 5 3 3 6 11 12 6 2 4 4 13 12
1 million ++ 500,000 - 999,000 200,000 - 499,000 100,000 - 199,000 10,000 - 99,000 < 10,000 Nothing
61
61
59
57
2007***
2008**
2009***
2012****
61
30

ENTERPRISES: THE COMPANYS CONTRIBUTION TO ANY PRIVATE ANTI-CORRUPTION PROGRAM IN THE LAST 2 YEARS, 2007 to 2012 1 million ++
1 0.3 1 2 5 7 2 2 1 2 4 10 2 0.4 1 2 5 6 2 1 1 2 6 11
500,000 - 999,000 200,000 - 499,000 100,000 - 199,000 < 10,000
80
78
81
74
Nothing
2007***
2008**
2009***
2012**** TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION
62
ENTERPRISES: FREQUENCY OF PUNISHING CORRUPT EXECUTIVES IN OWN SECTOR OF BUSINESS, 2003/04 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector 9 13 14 11 23 12 11 13
Almost never
30
37 28 29 27 29 27 21 22 20
Seldom
20
22
20
Often
29 '03**
31
34
27 '07***
30
25 '09***
33
Almost always
'05***
'06***
'08**
'12****
63
31

ENTERPRISES WITH A WRITTEN CODE OF ETHICS, 2002/03 TO 2012
65 60
61
64
67
71
67
66
'02*
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
64
ENTERPRISES HAVING CLEAR RULES ON GIVING GIFTS TO GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, 2005 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say Their Company Has Code of Ethics
47 34 35 36 39 32
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
65
32

9) HONEST BUSINESS PRACTICES
66
ENTERPRISES: NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN THE LINE OF BUSINESS THAT DEMAND/ISSUE DEMAND RECEIPTS, KEEP ONE SET OF ACCOUNTS, AND PAY TAXES HONESTLY, 2012
0.1 1 10 0.3 1 21 32 44 46 42 45 32 20 Demand receipts for all payments for expenses Issue receipts for all revenues Pay taxes honestly 21 40 30 1 5 2 6
None Hardly any Few
Most
Almost all
67
Keep only one set of accounts/ books TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION
33

ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS PAY TAXES HONESTLY, 2003/04 TO 2012
39
38
40
38
40
42
42
Most
16 '03**
19 '05***
18 '06***
18 '07***
18 '08**
17 '09***
20 '12****
Almost all
68
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS ISSUE RECEIPTS FOR ALL REVENUES, 2003/04 TO 2012
48 47
44
45
44 45
46
Most
38
34
36
34
37
31
32
Almost all
'03**
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
69
34

ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS KEEP ONLY ONE SET OF ACCOUNTS, 2003/04 TO 2012
43
45
39
39
43
40
40
Most
23 '03**
24 '05***
24
22 '07***
20 '08**
19 '09***
21 '12****
Almost all
'06***
70
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OF BUSINESS DEMAND RECEIPTS FOR ALL PAYMENTS, 2005 TO 2012
45
38
37
36 42
44
Most
51
50
49
53
45
45
Almost all
'05***
'06***
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
71
35

10) THE BUSINESS CLIMATE
72
ENTERPRISES: SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT IN PROMOTING A GOOD BUSINESS CLIMATE, 2007 TO 2012
12 27 47 20 19 18 71 53 35 43 38 18
Dissatisfied
Undecided
Satisfied
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
73
36

ENTERPRISES: SATISFACTION WITH YOUR CITY/MUNICIPALITY IN PROMOTING A GOOD BUSINESS CLIMATE, 2007 TO 2012
19 20 21 19
Dissatisfied Undecided
16
15
16
16
64
64
63
66
Satisfied
'07***
'08**
'09***
'12****
74
ENTERPRISES: BUSINESS EXPECTATIONS IN THE NEXT 2 YEARS, 2000 TO 2012

13 3 21 34 44 36 40 30 16 1 '00* 26 3 '02* 25 3 6 5 41 6 6 23 21 40 42 40 52 33 46 40 43 58
Good
3 11
3 10
2 5
3 13
1 5
0.1 3 23
Very Poor Poor Fair
32
37
1 '01*
16 Excellent '12****
'03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09***
75
37

SUMMARY (1/4) The 2012 Survey of Enterprises on Corruption is the 10th since 2000, with the largest sample and area coverage so far. This prelim. report uses 826 interviews from the 950 target companies (87% completion so far, from July 16 to September 14). 42% see a lot of corruption in the public sector lowest since 2000. 41% say most/almost all in their sector give bribes to win public sector contracts lowest since 2000. 32% know of corruption in their sector in the last 3 months lowest since 2006. 71% see less corruption now, only 3% see more corruption now, compared to the previous administration.
76
SUMMARY (2/4) Ratings of sincerity in fighting corruption have improved for 17 of 20 institutions: At Excellent is the OP (from Bad); At Very Good are DOH and DTI (both from Good); At Good are DepEd and Ombudsman (both from Neutral); At Moderate and rising are Sandiganbayan (formerly Neutral), DILG and DBM (both from Poor), and DOTC (from Bad). At Moderate but falling are the City Govt. and the Supreme Court (both from Good).
77
38

SUMMARY (3/4) At Neutral and improved are: DENR (from Bad), the House of Reps(from Bad), and PNP (from Poor); At Poor but improved are: BIR (from Very Bad), DPWH (from Very Bad), and LTO (from Bad); At Poor and falling is Comelec (from Neutral); At Bad but improved is BOC (from Very Bad). There is no Very Bad in 2012. Majorities see corruption cases in court going fairly, but too slowly. 48% were solicited for a bribe, versus 60% in the 2009 survey; but reporting of solicitation remains very low.
78
SUMMARY (4/4) Corruption is less in the private sector than in the public sector, but is also serious, and has not improved. Although companies say success in fighting corruption will make them more profitable, they are not helping much to pay the bill. The extent of honest business practices is unsatisfactory and not improving. Business prospects have never been better; executives give much credit to the National Government for this.
79
39

www.sws.org.ph
#52 Malingap Street, E-mail: Sikatuna Village, Quezon City Tels: 926-4308, 924-4456, 924-4458, 924-4465
sws_info@sws.org.ph
80
www.sws.org.ph
THE SWS MISSION IS TO GENERATE DATA to help eyes to see Education to cause hearts to feel Conscientization to help minds to understand Analysis
81
40

www.sws.org.ph
Quot homines tot sententiae
As Many Opinions As There are People
82
41


SWS Enterprise Survey On Corruption 2012

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

SWS Enterprise Survey On Corruption 2012

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

The TAG 2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

Error Margin 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% 3% 7% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

THE SWS SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES, 2000 TO 2012: A partial-panel design

826 226 100 100 100 100 100 100

495 145 76 99 100 75

331 81 100 24 100 1 0 25

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

PHILIPPINES : Metro Manila Balance Luzon Visayas Mindanao : : : :

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

1) PUBLIC SECTOR CORRUPTION

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

ENTERPRISES: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, 2000 TO 2012

'05*** '06*** '07*** '08**

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

ENTERPRISES: LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT WHERE CORRUPTION HAPPENS, 2009 and 2012

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

Cabinet-level/top-level management officials

Rank and file employees

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

Most Almost all

'05*** '06*** '07***

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

Both [volunteered] Corruption hurts the countrys development

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

SOCIAL WEATHER STATIONS

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

2) SINCERITY IN FIGHTING CORRUPTION

TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES ON CORRUPTION

Partial Results as of 14 September 2012

'05* '06* '07* '08

'05* '06* '07***

'03 '05* '06* '07* '08 '09* '12****