100%(3)100% нашли этот документ полезным (3 голоса)
1K просмотров34 страницы
Petitioners raised the following grounds in assailing the law:
A. The Cybercrime Act violates free speech
B. Sections 6 and 7 of the Cybercrime Act violate the double jeopardy and equal protections clauses of the Constitution
C. The real time data collection of traffic data violates the right to privacy and the right against unreasonable searches and seizure
D. The Respondent DOJ Secretary's take down authority under Sec. 19 of the Cybercrime Act violates due process and is an undue delegation of legislative authority
Petitioners stressed that the questioned provisions of the law "inter-operate with each other to create a 'chilling effect'" upon constitutional freedoms.
Aside from the Disini, et al. petition, businessman Louis "Barok" Biraogo and ALAM party list also filed separate petitions with the high court assailing the constitutionality of the same provisions in the law.
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/09/26/12/3rd-petition-vs-cybercrime-act-filed-sc
Оригинальное название
Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition on Republic Act 10175 Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 Filed by Atty JJ Disini & citizens
Petitioners raised the following grounds in assailing the law:
A. The Cybercrime Act violates free speech
B. Sections 6 and 7 of the Cybercrime Act violate the double jeopardy and equal protections clauses of the Constitution
C. The real time data collection of traffic data violates the right to privacy and the right against unreasonable searches and seizure
D. The Respondent DOJ Secretary's take down authority under Sec. 19 of the Cybercrime Act violates due process and is an undue delegation of legislative authority
Petitioners stressed that the questioned provisions of the law "inter-operate with each other to create a 'chilling effect'" upon constitutional freedoms.
Aside from the Disini, et al. petition, businessman Louis "Barok" Biraogo and ALAM party list also filed separate petitions with the high court assailing the constitutionality of the same provisions in the law.
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/09/26/12/3rd-petition-vs-cybercrime-act-filed-sc
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Petitioners raised the following grounds in assailing the law:
A. The Cybercrime Act violates free speech
B. Sections 6 and 7 of the Cybercrime Act violate the double jeopardy and equal protections clauses of the Constitution
C. The real time data collection of traffic data violates the right to privacy and the right against unreasonable searches and seizure
D. The Respondent DOJ Secretary's take down authority under Sec. 19 of the Cybercrime Act violates due process and is an undue delegation of legislative authority
Petitioners stressed that the questioned provisions of the law "inter-operate with each other to create a 'chilling effect'" upon constitutional freedoms.
Aside from the Disini, et al. petition, businessman Louis "Barok" Biraogo and ALAM party list also filed separate petitions with the high court assailing the constitutionality of the same provisions in the law.
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/09/26/12/3rd-petition-vs-cybercrime-act-filed-sc
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd