Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Towards a
National Organic Action Plan
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
This document is dedicated to the hundreds of participants around the country who donated their time, talent,
and expertise to participate in multi-day dialogue meetings, numerous workshops, conference calls, or written
input to share their vision of the future of organic food and agriculture in the United States.
And of course, we all give thanks and acknowledgment to the family farmers who began, built, and continue to
innovate the organic production system in this country and around the world.
The National Organic Action Plan (NOAP) Project is a collaborative project led by RAFI-USA which provides overall
programmatic development and organizing support. Michael Sligh and Liana Hoodes led this work for RAFI, and
led the NOAP Planning Team (listed below) -- a working group of volunteers. This Team came together to plan the
Project, including the writing of this document (*denotes Drafting Team members), the Summit content and logistics,
and the planning for attendance and input at Dialogue meetings and the Summit.
*Liana Hoodes
*Michael Sligh Published By: Rural Advancement
Foundation International-USA
*Elizabeth Henderson, editor PO Box 640, 274 Pittsboro
*Jim Riddle Elementary School Rd,
*Faye Jones Roger Blobaum Pittsboro, NC 27312
*Harriet Behar Steve Etka www.rafiusa.org
*Mark Lipson Steve Gilman (919) 542-1396
*Lynn Coody Cynthia Hayes
*Zachariah Baker Brise Tencer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
INTRODUCTION 5
- The Method 5
- Why Now? 6
- Action Plans Elsewhere 6
- On-Going NOAP Dialogue 7
BACKGROUND 9
- Current Status of U.S. Organic Agriculture 10
3
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper represents nearly five years
of dialogue meetings among a wide cross section of organic movement and industry
with the express purpose of encouraging the development of a National Organic Action
Plan that reflects the passions, concerns, hopes, and visions of this diverse and thriving
community.
The true significance of organic agriculture emerges when we view it in the broad
context of its potential to contribute to reversing our planetary collision course with
the earth’s ecological carrying capacity. Organic agriculture offers concrete solutions to
many of our societal, environmental and rural development challenges today. Mitigation
of agricultural causes of global climate change, improved soil, animal and human health,
and improved quality of life, water quality, and rural economic development head the
list of the major contributions of the organic agricultural approach to solving the food
and fiber challenges of the 21st Century.
This paper establishes goals and objectives and outlines benchmarks for achieving and
measuring our collective and on-going progress toward these solutions.
This is not a scientific or peer-reviewed exercise but rather an organizing effort to
empower the grassroots to engage more effectively in reaching organic agriculture’s
potential. The real measures of progress on organic food and agriculture will only be as
good as our collective abilities to articulate clear goals, benchmarks and timelines:
Our central challenge is how best to continue the growth of organic agriculture while
preserving organic integrity and retaining farmer and customer confidence.
Five major themes that emerged during the dialogue sessions provide an overarching
and broad framework for this effort:
• To ensure organic integrity and continued organic quality improvements.
• To ensure a fair marketplace for U.S. family farms and workers.
• To ensure access to healthy organic food for all U.S. income levels.
• To maximize U.S. organic production potential to ensure an increasing U.S.-
produced share of the U.S. organic marketplace and ensure that each state
maximizes its potential to meet in-state organic demand.
• To move U.S. organic food and agriculture policy from its focus on the
marketplace to encompass the significant goals associated with the public
good, including social change, public health and environmental protection.
This paper attempts to reflect honestly what was heard during the grassroots listening
sessions, and will serve as the basis for setting priorities at the 2009 National Organic
Action Plan Summit on February 25-26, in La Crosse, Wisconsin.
It will be the guide for prioritizing the specific major objectives to meet the five
overarching goals for the future of U.S. organic agricultural development.
The resulting post-summit final report will be distributed to all dialogue and summit
participants and widely posted. It will also serve as the basis for further societal, policy
and civil engagement to establish mechanisms for on-going and measurable progress.
Michael Sligh, founding chair of the National Organic Standards Board and member
of the NOAP Drafting Team, reflects: “History will not only judge us by how well we
managed our resources but by how well we defended the opportunities of future
generations. Now is the time for us to set the course.”
4
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
INTRODUCTION
The Method
The national dialogues were organized by project leaders Michael Sligh and Liana
Hoodes with assistance from the NOAP Planning Team. The agenda set the parameters
for the dialogues (see sample agenda, p. 12), but participants were free to bring forth
any topic or concern. Lively and sometimes heated discussions took place as the
agenda moved from identifying the positives and negatives in organic today to looking
towards a vision of organic food and agriculture in the future. The staff at each session
made every attempt to capture all contributions. With the goal of being as inclusive as
possible, the Drafting Team then took the many pages of notes and boiled them down
into eight general categories, eliminating repetition and consolidating closely related
suggestions.
The Planning Team put a lot of energy into publicizing the summit meeting all over the
country and to raising funds to subsidize the cost of attending so that no one would be
excluded because of financial constraints.
5
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
At the summit, participants will review, revise and prioritize the many proposals. The
process for the summit provides opportunities for all participants to express their
views, to engage in discussion with one another, and to come to consensus around
a final plan. The concluding session will be devoted to agreeing upon next steps to
maximize the usefulness and effectiveness of the NOAP and to energizing and activating
the participants and their communities.
why now?
The Planning Team decided to undertake this NOAP project for a number of pressing
reasons:
• Continued exponential growth of U.S. organic food and agriculture over the past
three decades,
• The far greater growth of organic acreage and production in European Union
countries where governments are far more supportive of the development and
spread of organic agriculture, and where action plans have been developed,
• Failure of the U.S. government to provide vision or leadership for growth of the
organic sector,
• Failure of the U.S. government and U.S. food and agriculture sector to develop goals
for the growth of the organic sector beyond retail/market-based growth goals,
• Desire of the grassroots voices of the organic community to be better heard in
federal, state and local policy arenas, and
• Desire to create an expanded policy agenda that reflects the broader environmental,
social, health, and economic goals and benefits of organic agriculture, including
access to healthy food for people of all income levels.
6
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
In its initial plan (2004), the EU sought to “ensure the on-going development of the
organic sector in the Community and also, through this development, to facilitate
imports of organic produce from developing countries.” [European Action Plan for
Organic Food and Farming, Commission of the European Communities, Commission
Working Document, 10 June 2004, p.3] Significantly, the EU recognized early on the
environmental value of organic and eco-agricultural practices. The EU plan states:
“where farmers provide services to the environment beyond the reference level of good
agricultural practices, these should be adequately remunerated.” [p.4] Examples of this
include payments for the creation of specific habitats of targeted species and support
for documented water quality protection.
In the fall of 2008, the EU began to consider incorporating organic principles in the EU
Common Agriculture Programme (CAP) to reach specific objectives:
• Ensure food safety, including public health aspects;
• Contribute to global dietary health to participate in world food safety;
• Preserve the equilibrium of rural areas; and
• Participate in the fight against climate change and for environmental improvement.
[19/09/08 IFOAM/EU Group Press Release]
7
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
program believed that the establishment of a national label with consistent standards
and comprehensive oversight would advance the cause of organic food and agriculture.
The energy required to move government agencies in a new direction, combined with
the lack of an overall strategic vision, has limited progress in realizing the multiple
benefits of organic systems.
As U.S. organic agriculture expands and matures, citizens must decide who will
continue to define what is and what is not organic. A successful, transparent and
participatory NOAP process can provide a way for citizens to periodically evaluate the
role and performance of the U.S. government, and to update and perfect U.S. organic
regulations and statutes.
The National Organic Action Plan Project is an on-going dialogue, in which the voices
of the organic grassroots from all sectors listen to one another in a dynamic process
that lays out goals for the development of organic food and agriculture in the United
States for the next decade and beyond.
Geographic
Geographic Distribution
Distribution of Certified
of Certified Organic
Organic Growers
Producers in the United
and Handlers States
in the U.S., 2006
Source: Organic Farming Research Foundation, 2007, by Jose Torres, from USDA National Organic
Program Data, using Google Earth software.
8
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
BACKGROUND
In the United States and many other countries, farmers and other citizens who
were determined to resist the accelerating industrialization of agriculture were
inspired to promote and define organic agriculture as an alternative. By 1972, the
adherents of organic had the resources to establish the International Federation
of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), which has grown to include over 700
organizations from over 100 countries. A central purpose of IFOAM was to write
standards for organic farming and processing in a democratic and participatory way.
The IFOAM Basic Standards served as the template for most of the organic standards
used today. The European countries were the first to develop governmental policies
and regulations for the promotion of certified organic agriculture. In addition to
the multi-lateral, UN-based Codex organic food labeling guidelines, more than 50
countries now have national organic policies and/or regulations. While organic
standards have not been harmonized globally, there is an increasing movement
in that direction. This may further spur worldwide growth in production and
international trade.
Global certified organic acreage has increased steadily at the impressive rate of 20%
per year, reaching over 76 million acres in 2008 with global sales of over $40 billion
USD. Sales of organic products have paralleled the expansion of acreage, growing at
20% per year for more than a decade in the United States. Even in a down economy,
this growth appears to be continuing.
The largest geographic
area of organic
production, as the
table on this page
demonstrates, is in the
Oceania region with
its large expanse of
pasture-based organic
acreage.
Source: Willer and Yussefi, editors, The World of Organic Agriculture, Statistics and Emerging Trends, 2007,
2007.
9
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
The United States remains the largest single-country market leader with over $16
billion USD in organic sales in 2007 and a projected continued growth rate.
10
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
In 2004, following a decade of advocacy for family-scale farming and small scale
certification programs during the development of U.S. federal organic regulations and
the 2002 Farm Bill, RAFI and the groups that formed the National Organic Coalition
(NOC) agreed the time was ripe for a more comprehensive process for advancing
organic food and agriculture. Tired of just reacting, they initiated work on a grassroots
organic vision, similar to National Organic Action Plans developed in the EU countries
and elsewhere. The early phases of this U.S. NOAP process focused on outreach to
stakeholders to develop an organic agenda for the 2007/08 Farm Bill, later broadening
the discussion to include goals beyond the federal policy arena.
The Dialogues
Beginning in the Summer of 2006 and continuing, through 2007 and 2008, National
Organic Action Plan dialogue meetings were held in 11 venues, engaging over 300
participants from 35 states in structured discussions about the current state and future
vision for organic food and agriculture in the United States.
DIALOGUE VENUES
• Northeast Organic Farming Association meeting, Amherst, MA, August 2006;
• Oregon Tilth Annual Meeting, Salem OR, October 2006,
• North Carolina State Dialogue Meeting, November 2006,
• Southern SAWG Annual Meeting --Kentucky, January 2007,
• California Ecological Farming Conference, Asilomar, CA, January 2007,
• Pennsylvania Association of Sustainable Agriculture Meeting, State College, PA,
February 2007,
• Upper Midwest Organic Farm Conference, LaCrosse, WI, February 2007; plus an
11
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
12
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
13
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
• Authorizes funding for beginning farmers, farmers markets, value added grants,
breeding research, farm-to-school, specialty crops, and conservation assistance
programs, all of which are open to organic producers.
There is also growth and development of new organic infrastructure to service the
production sector. This is evidenced by the emergence and growth of such diverse
groups as the Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI),
“Organic proves there is Organic Trade Association (OTA), National Organic
Coalition (NOC), Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
an agriculture beyond the (SAC), Organic Farming Research Foundation (OFRF),
industrial model.” International Organic Inspectors Association (IOIA),
Organic Consumers Association (OCA), the Cornucopia
Washington, DC Dialogue meeting, 2007
Institute, The Organic Center, Congressional Organic
Caucus, Accredited Certifiers Association (ACA), National Association of State Organic
Programs (NASOP), and eOrganic. These groups, and many others, provide services
to meet the ever-expanding demand for information and institutional support from
farmers, the market, and their customers.
The availability of and access to organic foods and fibers have expanded, along with
the quality, quantity, and varieties of organic food and fiber products. There is also
major growth in the scope of organic into non-food and non-farm organic products and
services (e.g., personal care, pet food, and landscaping).
Organic agriculture is now in the process of being mainstreamed in the marketplace.
This has important positive impacts by increasing access to greater diversity and
numbers of consumers, and increasing the variety of marketing opportunities for
producers. For example, organic dairy products are viewed as a gateway into organic
food for new mothers, leading to the purchase and consumption of additional organic
products.
The environmental and health benefits of organic production are now being more
widely researched, identified, and recognized, including wide-ranging benefits from
increased health of soils to the health of plants, animals, children, and adults. There
has been recent widespread recognition of the benefits of organic agriculture for
increased soil organic matter, carbon sequestration, moisture retention, and drought
tolerance, with organic being generally recognized as a ‘climate and environmentally
friendly’ way to farm. Emerging research demonstrates that organic systems protect
ground and surface water quality from pollutants. Organic foods are shown to have
significantly lower levels of pesticide residues and higher levels of nutrients, compared
to non-organic foods. Improved taste and nutrition, as well as expanding educational
outreach to families, nutritionists, and health care providers, are now being seen as
very important because of recognized health benefits of organic food, especially for
children.
Farmers are attracted to organic farming as a way to be good stewards of their land,
both in respect to those who preceded them on the land and for those who will follow
them. Organic agriculture gives them the tools and knowledge to enhance crop and
animal health and yields, while at the same time enhancing environmental quality and
improving the ecosystem where they live and work.
The improved quality of life of farmers, workers, their families, and rural communities,
as well as improved prices and the promise of additional market-based claims for social
justice and animal welfare, are hopeful signs that the organic sector can provide much
needed additional market protections for farmers and workers.
14
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
15
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
Additionally, concerns about farmer and farmworker rights, migrant labor, changing
organic contracts, and farmer and worker pay prices and benefits are now being
challenged with more public attention. The need to find ways to institutionalize fair
prices, wages and benefits, and to build bridges to the worker community as well as
the need to address scale, ownership, and control of the organic sector are all viewed
as critical to the long-term success and sustainability of organic agriculture.
Organic market concentration and increasingly corporate appointments to the
National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) are new concerns for civil society and
organic supporters. The lack of continuous quality improvements in organic standards
and the difficulties in tightening federal organic regulations remain common
concerns. Especially expressed are concerns about organic becoming simply an “input
substitution” approach, rather than a holistic, ecologically-sound agricultural system,
when farmers and processors receive certification to the lowest enforceable standard.
The development and implementation of a functioning organic system, as envisioned
in OFPA, are at times viewed as impossible achievements by some, while other long-
time committed organic producers know this is the only way to truly have vibrant
organic farms, where weeds, pests and diseases are well managed and nutrient-dense
foods are produced. The lack of practical, transparent and participatory mechanisms
to continually improve the OFPA, the NOP regulation, and enforcement mechanisms,
are clearly major challenges and needs.
The NOP, as the only federally mandated accreditation body, has yet to produce an
accreditation manual, implement the required peer view oversight requirements, or
address many NOSB recommendations. The NOP, as accreditor, is not in compliance with
internationally accepted accreditation norms, such as 1SO 17011. These deficiencies
are all indicative of the many growing pains, bureaucratic bottlenecks, and lack of
political will impacting this relatively new government program and regulation.
All dialogue sessions, as well as significant numbers of other comments, have pointed to
the problem of an under-funded and under-staffed National Organic Program, its poor
record of enforcement, and the lack of clarity in specific standards development. Lack
of clarity and enforcement of the pasture standard alone has the potential to destroy
the high integrity of the entire label. Interestingly, while these items may individually
be on the road to being addressed, they highlight the potential for very specific federal
program implementation issues to define the success of the organic industry.
Concerns about the pressures, costs and access for small organic farmers and the great
need for additional technical support and education for new farmers, school systems,
and consumers are frequently expressed. The need for a knowledgeable, fully-funded,
and empowered organic extension-type service, staffed by organic farmers, non-
government experts, and others with specific organic knowledge is identified as part of
the missing infrastructure needed to more systematically meet the demands of farmers
converting to organic production.
These concerns, coupled with the urgent need for strategies to address and balance
the pressures between market/pull and supply/push while embracing our national
need to re-invent our regional food systems and infrastructure, are emerging as major
themes, challenges, and opportunities for the organic sector. Concerns about unfair
organic imports and trade are also increasingly heard.
The misconception that organic food fills a “niche” in the marketplace that is available
only to those who can afford higher prices contributes to blocking access to organic
foods by people of all income levels, compounding the injustice of the current “cheap
16
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
food” system. Food justice would demand that everyone, regardless of income, have
access to the most nourishing food.
The failure to adequately address animal welfare and food safety concerns, or to
respond to the growing number of “eco-labels” and “buy-local” campaigns also poses
major challenges for the organic community. The lack of sophisticated measures and
standards for soil quality, biodiversity, and carbon sequestration has increased the
push for private “eco-labels” and become a barrier to increased support for organic
production.
The perennial call for a research system that is more participatory, meets farmers’ needs,
and addresses demands to expand the current scope of organic standards, remain as
compelling, yet unresolved, challenges. There is also the broad-based concern that the
lack of holistic or systems research leads toward more “input substitution,” justified by
reductionist research.
The lack of organized political power for organic farmers, as well as the increasing
“push-back” from agribusiness due to the organic sector’s successes, is a growing
concern. Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) contamination and threats to our
seed and food supply, along with the need for real GMO liability mechanisms, remain as
major threats to the future of the organic marketplace.
Many view one of the negative outcomes of the USDA organic regulation as the
prohibition of organic farmers to sit on their own organic certification boards. Many
viewed this as having “decapitated” organic farmers in the organic regulatory process.
This development has led to a loss of an organized organic farmers’ voice, since it was
organic farmers who had launched and developed many of the U.S. organic certification
programs. These gaps and challenges can best be filled (at least in the short term) from
the grassroots with regional and national structures being organized to provide greater
access, capacity, and effective collaboration.
Finally, establishing full-cost accounting systems to better quantify and promote the
real benefits of organic agriculture, and to highlight the real costs associated with so-
called “cheap foods,” stands out as a major challenge with great potential payback.
Despite these challenges, organic agriculture holds enormous potential to deliver
multiple benefits to society, the environment, and to the economic and social stability
of our food system.
17
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
18
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
SMART Objectives
The EU “ORGAP” Project [European Action Plan for organic food and farming – Development of
criteria and evaluation procedures for the evaluation of the EU Action Plan for Organic Agriculture]
summarized a common framework for evaluating objectives – making sure that objectives should
be SMART – [ORGAP, No. CT-2005-006591]
a Specific:
Objectives should be precise and concrete enough not to be open to varying interpretations.
a Measurable:
Objectives should define a desired future state in measurable terms, so that it is possible to verify
whether the objective has been achieved or not. Such objectives are either quantified or based on a
combination of description and scoring scales.
a Achievable:
If objectives and target levels are to influence behavior, they must be accepted, understood and
interpreted similarly by all who are expected to take responsibility for achieving them.
a Realistic:
Objectives and targets should be ambitious while realistic – setting an objective that only reflects
the current level of achievement is not useful.
a Time-dependent:
Objectives and target levels remain vague if they are not related to a fixed date or time period.
The draft objectives with their and benchmarks are presented according to the following
categories:
A. Environment
B. Health
C. Social and Cultural Change
D. Research
E. Education
F. Organic Integrity: Standards, Enforcement and Compliance
G. Marketplace
H. Transition and Incentives
19
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
A. ENVIRONMENT
The United States government remains one of the last of the industrialized countries to recognize the “public
goods’ delivered by organic agriculture. The environmental and health values of organic production are often the
values understood most clearly by the public in and outside of the organic community. But, they are not formally
recognized through the USDA/NOP program.
Worldwide, nearly every government with any focus on organic agriculture lays out the environmental values of
organic alongside its marketplace value, and most distinguish organic farmers’ “services to the environment” as
major public contributions beyond what the organic farmers may retrieve in the marketplace. Governments often
acknowledge the need to pay for or reward those services as public goods delivered.
As increasing amounts of data accumulate demonstrating the quantifiable, long-term environmental benefits of
organic agriculture, as well as its unique ability to mitigate some of the negative effects of global climate change,
the U.S. Government needs to acknowledge and embrace these as well.
In the development of goals, mechanisms, and benchmarks at the dialogues, the environmental category spurred
the deepest and broadest discussion and detail. Implementation will require coordinated efforts to better define the
issues, delineate the values, and formulate the strategies needed to incorporate these values into both marketplace
rewards and governmental policies.
20
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
11. Measure carbon sequestration contributions from organic production and increase
carbon sequestration by 2020 through organic farming, organic forest management,
and grassland and pasture increases. Establish organic farmer carbon credit
incentives and rewards by 2020.
12. Establish baselines with sustainability and life cycle analysis targets by 2020 for:
• Packaging
• Distribution
• Transportation, food miles, and costs of transport
• Energy use – electric, water, manufacturing
• Recycling of agricultural and packing plastics
13. Implement land use planning which places high value on agricultural lands for
organic use in all regions by 2020.
14. Shift buffer responsibility for both GMO and chemical trespass to manufacturers
and/or patent–holders, to be implemented by 2020.
15. Pass legislation placing the liability for contamination with GMOs on the
manufacturer by 2012.
16. Implement regulations that better protect organic farms from contamination by
pesticides and GMOs by 2020.
17. Reduce runoff into rivers and protect groundwater quality through a significant
increase in organic farming by 2020.
18. Implement marketplace incentives for the eco-system “services” and stewardship
practices of organic production by 2020.
19. Establish the polluter-pays principle as federal policy by 2020 by instituting taxes
on synthetic fertilizers, GMOs, xeno-biotics, and other synthetic substances, with
proceeds used to fund organic research and market incentive programs by 2020,
(replicating the successful Danish program).
20. By 2012, establish enhanced producer payments
“Organic as ‘climate friendly’ through the Conservation Stewardship Program, by
assigning points to raise organic farmer applications to a
farming” California Dialogue meeting, 2007 higher tier, in recognition of the environmental benefits
delivered by organic management practices.
21. Move conservation set-aside lands, such as land coming out of the Conservation
Reserve Program, into working organic agricultural lands through 2020.
21
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
B. health
The health benefits of organically grown foods have long been appreciated and widely understood as one of the main
attributes that continue to draw new supporters to organic foods and remain a bedrock for long term supporters.
In recent years organic milk has been seen as a “gateway” food for new mothers or families with young children.
A promising trickle of new research, mostly coming from the EU but with a few studies at U.S. universities, is
documenting what consumers have long suspected: that organic foods not only reduce exposure to toxic pesticides
from the foods consumed but that organic foods exhibit nutritional qualities not found in so-called ‘conventional’
foods. In addition, the reduction of occupational exposure for both farmers and workers is increasingly appreciated
as a concrete health and safety contribution from organic farming. The U.S. government, however, has refused to
recognize this contribution in any way, shape or form. Both research and education are key to enabling the many
potential organic contributions to public health, safety and well-being.
22
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
12. Provide public funding for scientific studies on the health consequences of GMO
foods by 2012.
13. Provide substantive organic food in Senate and House cafeterias by 2012.
14. Establish organic farm-to-school programs throughout the U.S. by 2020.
15. Create additional focus on safety and nutrition of organic products through
consumer education and targeted market research by 2010.
23
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
24
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
14. Establish, measure and monitor the continuous improvement of labor issues in
organic food system chains, including access to benefits for workers on organic
farms by 2012.
15. Increase the number of types of farmer cooperatives and monitor and nurture the
growth and emergence of successful organic farmer cooperatives by 2012.
“Organic is making the 16. Create baseline data by 2012 to track organic enterprise
diversity, diversity of scale, and diversity of ownership.
connection– ‘re-localize, 17. Increase local and regional access to land and credit
through education of the banking community by 2012:
re-regionalize, and include Identify the best working examples, create a baseline of
justice.’” Boston Dialogue meeting, 2008 current success, and track progress goals.
18. Establish an organic traders’ code of conduct by 2012 to
foster international organic cooperation with the goals of fair access to international
trade, including no organic export or import dumping.
19. Establish organic garden programs in all U.S. major cities by 2020.
20. Form alliances with organized labor: push for passage of the Employee Free Choice
Act in 2009.
21. Pressure the Department of Justice to enforce laws against excessive monopolization
of markets through agricultural mergers and acquisitions in the organic sector by
2010.
25
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
d. RESEARCH
The lack of high quality scientific information and its efficient dissemination are severe limiting factors for the
improvement and increased adoption of organic systems. “Fair share” funding1 of organic research and extension
is a first critical benchmark for overcoming these limitations. While significantly increased funding is necessary
to catalyze the overall goals of this NOAP, it alone is not sufficient. To fully meet the need for the identification,
improvement and wide adoption of “best organic management practices,” increased resources must be employed
within a more holistic, systems-oriented approach. Expanded organic research must be more timely, participatory,
and based on real farm-level systems and experiences.
The historic taboo in the United States on conducting research for organic farming (which continued well into the
late 1990s) has ensured a very large backlog of research objectives to be pursued. The first (and still unfulfilled)
compilation was published in 1980 by USDA itself and then buried. Since then farmers and their organizations
have continued to assert and develop research agendas, with institutions slowly but gradually following behind.
Notably, the privately funded Rodale Institute has continued to carry on serious organic research throughout the
last 30 years and has the largest historical data set for an organically managed cropping system. The Organic
Farming Research Foundation (OFRF) produced the most recent iteration of national research goals for organic
agriculture. OFRF’s 2007 National Organic Research Agenda contains national research goals and objectives on
the topics of Soil Management, Systemic Pest Control, Organic Livestock, and Genetics. The publication is available
free online at <http://ofrf.org/publications/pubs/nora2007.pdf>.
The 2008 Farm Bill (“Food, Energy and Conservation Act of 2008”) provides a down payment towards the fair
share funding goal. Further increases to reach that initial goal will still require significant advocacy efforts.
What remains to be constructed is a system of agroecological research and technology development that is broad
and diverse enough that organic principles permeate the entire agricultural research agenda. Organic farmers
stress the need for more farmer-friendly methodologies and farmer-to-farmer peer learning modalities as critical
components of our future organic research. A robust organic research enterprise will provide solutions for organic
and beyond and systematically cross over into more conventional agricultural practices outside the formal sphere
of organic certification to enable improved family farm profitability and performance towards environmental and
climate change goals.
1
“Fair Share funding” means matching the percentage of institutional resources explicit to organic agriculture with
at least the market share of organic products in the U.S. retail marketplace. In 2007 the USDA research funding dedicated to
organic systems was about 1.2%, while the organic retail market share was measured at 3.5%.
26
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
6. Direct funds and training resources to the NRCS so that staff, supervisors, and
technicians understand and are comfortable with a systems approach and the
conservation benefits of organic agriculture by 2012.
7. Establish Regional Organic Research Councils, using the SARE “model,” in all SARE
regions by 2012.
8. Target research funds to help with loss of certain chemicals as the Food Quality
Protection Act (FQPA) is implemented, with a focus on the development and
adoption of organic practices to replace toxic inputs by 2020.
9. Conduct objective, public-funded assessment of new and emerging technologies
(e.g., GMO, animal cloning, nano-technology) to determine
“We now have specific examples impacts on organic agriculture prior to approval, by
2012.
of organic farming measurably 10. Create centralized, searchable organic research
increasing biodiversity.” database by 2012.
Washington, DC Dialogue meeting, 2007
27
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
e. education
Organic education is the key to the expansion of the organic marketplace as it stimulates the growth of the next
generation of organic supporters, activists, policy makers, processors and farmers. Widespread understanding
of organic practices leads to knowledgeable consumers and producers who can effectively advocate for organic
integrity as well as increased organic food choices.
Organic agriculture relies on both the wisdom of past generations and the latest technologies. Since everyone in
society, as a consumer of food and fiber has a stake in agriculture, education about organic agriculture covers all
levels from kindergarten to high school, technical colleges to post doctorate, farmers to chefs, and food scientists
to consumers.
The success of the various urban school gardens has demonstrated that even those with no family ties to farming
are attracted to working with and understanding agriculture. Agricultural research stations across the United
States have begun transitioning a portion of their land to organic agriculture. Food technology laboratories
are developing foods that do not rely on synthetic inputs that are prohibited in organic production. Across the
countryside conventional farmers are asking their neighboring organic farmers to help them transition to organic
production. The opportunities to integrate organic learning into every age group, economic class and walk of life
are only limited by our imaginations.
28
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
12. Establish regional centers of organic agriculture training in all SARE regions by
2020 to focus on technology transfer, farm business management, season extension
and local food systems.
“The best protection for 13. Institutionalize academic rewards for organic
inter-disciplinary and systems research, education, and
organic integrity is an educated outreach by 2012.
14. Train bankers, economic development
consumer” Wisconsin Dialogue meeting, 2007 authorities, and investors in organic agriculture and food
systems in all regions by 2020.
15. Establish organic curricula for 4-H, FFA, vocational agriculture, and adult education
programs in all regions by 2020.
16. Develop curriculum and establish pilot programs in all states, tribal lands, and
territories to teach children to grow organic food by 2020.
17. Improve point of purchase information so that shoppers readily understand the
benefits of organic food and farming systems by 2012.
18. Develop and promote cooking skill training courses in public and private schools
nationwide by 2020, based on organic products.
19. Develop and promote consumer information to increase demand for transitional
products by 2012, including technical assistance and public education to stimulate
the consumption of transitional organic products.
20. Provide incentives for Extension Agents, by 2012, to be trained in organic production
and to provide outreach materials and activities for organic producers.
29
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
30
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
31
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
G. marketplace
Due to the federal definition of “organic” being limited to a marketing claim, which identifies specific production
and handling practices, marketplace mechanisms have been viewed as the area for innovation and development.
The blooming of the organic label in the nearly two decades since the passage of OFPA has created enormous
opportunities, as well as pitfalls. Marketplace goals and mechanisms have run the gamut from encouraging
globalization to building local innovative marketing systems, without adequate over-arching systematic objectives,
assessments or direction.
The goals in this category, more than the others, may only require independent innovators to move forward, yet many
of them would also require new models of cooperation not dependent on government actions. Implementation
of these goals will require a deepening of regional and state alliances and coalitions with greater communication
and linkage to related activities in other areas.
Marketplace objectives and benchmarks:
1. Reach the goal of 50% local organic production and processing by 2020 by increasing
organic regional food system infrastructure through state and federal supports
and the development of $10 billion dollars in socially responsible investment
supports.
2. Establish one inspection for multiple claims as the goal for organic certification by
creating Memorandums of Understanding between organic and other legitimate
certification programs and provide cross-training of organic inspectors to verify
multiple claims by 2012.
3. Establish and implement retail organic standards by 2020.
4. Organize regional farmer–driven and NGO–run organic centers to provide “one
stop” assistance for development of regional organic marketing infrastructure to
meet the needs of organic farmers, facilitate value-added on-farm and community-
based processing, and create regional supply and distribution chains by 2020.
5. Track organic food miles and add to local organic point-of-purchase consumer
information, to be implemented by 2012.
6. Develop place-based organic appellations by mapping geographically unique areas
and specialty products, and creating organic appellation criteria by 2012.
7. Establish full cost accounting for all food to achieve fair pricing and true transparency
by 2020.
8. Track organic imports by expanding federal import code system, to be accomplished
by 2012.
9. Acknowledge and reconcile the divisions within the organic marketplace by creating
an organic trade code of conduct complete with sanctions and reconciliation tools
by 2020.
10. Resolve the local/organic food dilemma by 2012. Acknowledge and celebrate
regionalism by restoring local economies through support for local organic and
fair foods infrastructure and labeling initiatives.
11. Develop institutional markets (i.e. hospitals, schools) by 2012 for local, organic and
fair trade products.
12. Prioritize the expansion of local organic meat processing opportunities including
organic mobile slaughter units and robust regional distributors and livestock
processing facilities by 2012.
32
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
13. Increase the number of organic cooperatives by 2012, based on strategic opportunity
assessments, start-up assistance, and leverage from existing successful organic
cooperatives.
14. Create access and availability for the rural and urban poor to organic products, now
deemed too expensive, to be implemented by 2012.
15. Establish a meta-data system by 2012 that tracks where and how organic food,
fiber, and fish are produced.
16. Create targeted organic marketing assistance via state departments of agriculture
by assessing current best examples and replicating them by 2012.
17. Protect and reform organic grower contracts by requiring full transparency of
organic contracts and offering model contracts with farmer-friendly education, to
be implemented by 2012.
18. Create legitimate marketplace–based additional claims
“Organic is building regional to certified organic to protect fair prices and treatment for
farmers and workers coupled with marketplace reward
and local food systems from the systems for social justice certification by 2020.
seeds up”Pennsylvania Dialogue meeting, 2007 19. Expand localized site specific organic seed production
capacities with a focus on improved nutritional, taste and
disease-resistance qualities with the goal of meeting 50%
of localized organic seed needs by 2020.
20. Create an Organic Food Quality Index in order to track and label organic food
quality and identify production and handling practices that result in high quality
food products by 2020.
21. Establish price premiums based on quality, nutrition, residues, and taste of organic
products by 2020.
22. Increase organic institutional procurement goals by 2012:
• 5% local organic food in schools, military, hospitals;
• 5% restaurants selling organic food;
• 1% of USDA budget to local organic processing; and
• 1% of schools with organic school gardens.
23. Seek support from food cooperatives, natural food stores, and other retailers as
major buyers of transitional to organic foods, implemented by 2012.
24. Organize an integrated organic marketing campaign based on the top 10 reasons
to buy organic by 2010.
33
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
34
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
8. Create a federal Transition to Organic Program and Label scheme by 2012, including
standards and other requirements, linked to a “push/pull” analysis to ensure no
market flooding.
9. Expand Beginning Farmer/Rancher Program by 2009, with full implementation by
2012 to encourage beginning farmers and ranchers to use organic practices. Include
access to loans, credit, and technical assistance; debt forgiveness, (i.e., college debt);
mentorship programs; commercial community gardens and processing centers;
CSA training programs; “cow share” programs; and domestic grower groups.
10. Institutionalize “Green” payments for organic pioneers coordinated with transition
payments for new entrants by 2012. Include low interest loans for organic
beginning farmers and mentorship payments for experienced organic producers
who help new and transitional producers establish organic systems.
11. Implement and fully fund a National Organic Conversion Incentive Program by 2009,
with financial and technical assistance targeted at crop and livestock products with
high market demand.
12. Create and promote incentives for hospitals, schools, prisons, and other public
institutions to serve transitional and organic foods nationwide by 2012.
13. Establish organic production and marketing assistance offices in each state by
2020.
14. Create federal, state, and local incentive support programs for local organic farmers,
markets, and producer organizations that meet local consumption demands, to be
implemented by 2020.
15. Lower certification costs and/or provide stable incentives nationwide to help
farmers and processors become certified, from present through 2020.
16. Create incentives by 2012 for family-size organic livestock farms to produce or
purchase organic feed.
17. Establish incentives to encourage federal, state, tribal, university, and municipal
lands to be rented or sold to organic producers by 2020.
18. Establish model local zoning preferences for organic management and preservation
of farmland by 2012.
19. Establish micro-financing programs for organic farmers and farmworkers by 2012,
targeted at underserved, disadvantaged, and immigrant communities.
20. Establish incentives for on-farm organic processing and other value-added
economic development by 2020.
21. Dedicate State lottery funds for organic incentives by 2020.
22. Establish small organic business incubator incentives to help stimulate agricultural
business and rural development by 2020.
35
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
From its inception, the organizers envisioned this National Organic Action Plan as an
on-going, dynamic and participatory process. Only a vigorous grassroots movement
will be able to implement these goals. This process requires active engagement at all
levels of civil society with full commitment to on-going and periodic evaluation of our
collective progress, as well as re-calibration of those parts of the plan that are falling
short.
To be successful, we must articulate SMART objectives with benchmarks and timelines,
and take care that a wide range of stakeholders not only endorse and embrace this
plan, but also remain engaged, fully incorporating summit results into their own farms,
communities, organizations and circles of influence. Only then can this process serve as
a powerful tool for further organic policy reforms and grassroots initiatives.
The NOAP Planning Team will publish the final post-summit document and, with the
help of summit and dialogue participants, distribute it widely. The National Organic
Coalition website, www.nationalorganiccoalition.org, will post this document along
with any comments received.
In addition to setting priorities, the goals for the summit include outlining an on-going
participatory process for assessing and measuring progress towards the objectives and
benchmarks, and utilizing the NOAP priorities to begin work on the 2012 Farm Bill.
Post –Summit goals include:
• Collection of additional baseline information to better document current progress,
• Wide distribution of final Plan document,
• Encouraging broad participation,
• Actively pursuing federal and state governmental engagement - targeting USDA
and other appropriate agencies and branches of government - to be both recipients
of this information, as well as willing partners in the implementation of the many
steps outlined, and
• Commitment to on-going evaluation, assessment. and implementation.
At the halfway point to the 2012 Farm Bill, we expect to conduct a formal and participatory
evaluation of our collective progress and continued barriers to full implementation of
priority goals. This will help us anchor our 2012 Farm Bill aspirations within our larger
framework.
36
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
37
TOWARDS A NATIONAL ORGANIC ACTION PLAN- Summit Discussion Paper
Mike Adams Ashley Colpaart, RD LD Ben Grosscup Adan Martinez Robin Seydel
Karen Adler Lynn Coody Ken Haines Andre Matthews Kelly Shea
Jeanne Aguerre Marc Cool Kari Hamerschlag Dave Mattocks Diane Shivera
Maria M. Aguiar Sandra Corlett Margot Ann Hamilton Marisa Mazzotta Robynn Shrader
Will Allen Rocky Cowie Jammy Hammer Jerry McGeorge Eric Sideman
Art Ames Joshua Cravens Eveline Hartz Jason McKenney George Siemon
Isaura Andaluz Nancy Creamer Jim Hartz Roland McReynolds Erin Silva
Bob Anderson Tracy Crockett Cynthia Hayes Dahinda Meda Sandra Simone
Karen Anderson Vernon Crockett Terry Hayes MargaretMellon Ruffin Slater
Nick Andrews John Culbreath Elizabeth Henderson Joe Mendelson Michael Sligh
Rachel Armstrong Mary Culbreath Josh Hinerfeld Kathleen Merrigan, PhD Evan Smith
Caralea Arnold Joe Cummins Clare Hinrichs Marty Mesh Johnny Smith
Kathie Arnold Lili Cummins Liana Hoodes Peggy Miars Kathy Soder
Ton Azevedo Ronnie Cummins Greg Horner G. Michael Moore Dorothea Sotiros
Alexis Baden-Mayer Steve Daily Charles Houston Joel Morton Julie Spandow
Dan Bair Diane Dempster Janna Howley Tom Nielsen Rebecca Spector
John Bakea Woody Deryckx Kiki Hubbard Clara Nunez Steve Sprinkel
Brian Baker Richard deWilde Julia Hundt Brian Obach Bob St. Peter
Zachariah Baker Kimberly Dickey Mary Ann Ihm Kevin Ogorzalek Daniel F. Stoltzfus
Owusu Bandele Jannie Dickson Marsha Ishii-Eiteman Keith Olcott John F. Stoltzfus
Donna Batcho Rocky Dickson Mary James Patti Olenick Alex Stone
JoAnn Baumgartner Kim Dietz Michael James Jackie Ostfeld Martha M Stone
Dan Beachy Atina Diffley Nelson James John O'Sullivan Kim Stoner
Carmela Beck Matthew Dillon Darron "Farmer D" Joffee Steve Pahacek Ron Strochlic
Harriet Behar Katherine DiMatteo Dave Johnson Loretta Palmer Barbara Sullivan
Curtis Bennett Maureen Doyle Louise Johnson Fawn Pattison Micholas Syaro
James Bernau Bill Duesing Faye Jones Kurt Peterson Mike Tabor
Terry Betts Young Rex Dufour Larry Julson Noah Pinck Mike Taft
Jane Bindley Jim Dyer Doris Kaberia Susan Ponsolle Sylvia Tawse
David Bingaman Dennis Eaton Patricia Kane Kim Pophal Brise Tencer
Melvin Bishop Gwendolyn Ellen Mark Keating Ted Quaday Bill Thomas
Roger Blobaum Tina Ellor Jonathan Kirschner Christine Rasmussen Brian Tokar
Gary David Bloss Deb Eschmeyer Dan Kittredge Torrey Reade Craig Tomera
Troy Bogdan Steve Etka Jack Kittredge Chris Reberg-Horton Charlotte Vallaeys
Philip Botwinick Earcine Evans Tony Kleese Horst Rechelbacher Peter Varley
Zoe Bradbury Mark Evans Sammy Koeningsberg Judith Redmond Chela Vazquez
Caroline Brock Dag Falck Robin Kohanowich Natalie Reitman-White Katy Vigil
Perry Brown Will Fantle Shane Labrake Sara Reynolds Gunta Vitins
Emily Brown-Rosen Jay Feldman Rick Lakin Eric Rice Chris Waldrop
Julia Brussell Larry Flournoy Gary Lambert Reba Richardson Nick Walters
Kevin Brussell Peggy Fogarty-Hainish Laurie Lange Jim Riddle Steve Warshawer
Deborah Burd John Fonteyn Jyll Lardaro Pam Riesgraf Eugene Washington
Ben Burkett John Foster Tawnya Laveta Bill Robinson Rose Welch
Don Bustos Laura Fredan Peter LeCompte Jose Rodriguez Eric Werbalowsky
Samantha Darrell Frey Craig Lee David Rogers Sarah West
Cabaluna Andy Friedberg Tracy Lerman Christina Romero Bonnie Wideman
Linda Calvey Sam Fromartz Russ Lester Debbie Roos Caren Wilcox
John Caputo Yvonne Frost Kim Leval John Roulac Caitlin Winans
Hannah Carey Caron Gala Russell Libby John Rowland Morgan Wolaver
Lynne Carpenter-Boggs Molly Garvey Mark Lipson Mickey Roy Bill Wolfe
Danielle Carro Mel Gehman David Lively Shauna Sadowski Enid Wonnacott
Dave Carter Steve Gilman Patty Lovera Janet Sala Kalthleen Wood
Melissa Chavis Holly Givens Felice Lucero Robert Sala Cecil Wright
Rick Christianson Kevin Golden Gene Ludiveker Susan Schechter Glenda Yoder
Cheri Clark Jim Goodman Laurie Lundgren Chris Schreiner Timothy Young
Carol Clarke Gregory Gould Harry MacCormack Amanda Schweogler Ed Zimba
Jim Cochran Hilton Graham Chris Malek Yvonne Scott Leslie Zuck
Darlene Coehoorn Jennifer Green Ed Maltby Judith Scoville
Jen Colby Tynesha Green Ron Maribett Richard Sechrist
38
National Organic Action Plan Summit Discussion Paper
Acknowledgements
The National Organic Action Plan project would not have been possible without the
generous support of many individuals and organizations, including the following
foundations and corporations:
Agua Fund
Clarence E. Heller Charitable Foundation
Cornerstone Campaign
CROPP Cooperative (Organic Valley/ Organic Prairie)
Farm Aid
John Merck Fund
Lawson Valentine Foundation
New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Newman’s Own Organics
North Pond Foundation
Nutiva Corporation
Patagonia
Numerous farm and community organizations from across the country have
contributed financial resources, staff time, technical assistance, and outreach to create
this document. These organizational partners include:
Midwest Organic and Sustainable Education Services (MOSES) — without whose significant
financial and administrative help this Summit and document would not have been possible
National Organic Coalition
National Campaign for Sustainable Agriculture
Beyond Pesticides
Center For Food Safety
Ecological Farming Association
Food and Water Watch
Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association
New Hope Communications
New Mexico Organic Commodity Commission
Northeast Organic Farming Association -Interstate Council
Northeast Organic Farming Association -Massachusetts
Northeast Organic Farming Association -Vermont
Oregon Organic Coalition
Organic Farming Research Foundation
Pennsylvania Certified Organic
Southeast African American Farmers Organic Network (SAAFON)
Southern Sustainable Agriculture Working Group
Otto Schmid – Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL) — Thanks for his patience
and generous contribution of expertise
Photographs by: Harriet Behar, Organic Specialist, MOSES; Terry Hayes, SAAFON;
Liana Hoodes; Leslie Zuck PCO; Reba Richardson; and Elizabeth Henderson.
Cover & Layout Design NOAP Logo Design
Ali Church Patric shaw, SCAD
39