Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 27

FRACTURE OF THE SUBCHONDRAL BONE IN OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE

ADVISER:

Dr. dr. R. Fx. Hendroyono, SpOT, MARS, FAAOS

COMPILED BY:
MUHAMAD REDZUAN BIN JOKIRAM

030.08.281

KEPANITERAAN KLINIK ILMU BEDAH RUMAH SAKIT UMUM DAERAH KOTA BEKASI FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS TRISAKTI PERIODE 3 SEPTEMBER 10 NOVEMBER 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I PREFACE 1.1...............................................................................................................................................2

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 2.1 Anatomy...............................................................................................................................3 2.2 Physiological bases of bone regeneration............................................................................8 2.3 General changes in bone in osteoartritis.............................................................................10 2.4 Osteoblasts and osteoarthritis.............................................................................................11 Biomechanical Aspects 2.5 Ranges of physiological forces on joint cartilage..............................................................13 2.6 Supranormal stress and strain can lead to injury................................................................14 2.7 Changes in biomechanical properties with age..................................................................14 2.8 Chondrocyte response to mechanical loading....................................................................15 2.9 Chondrocyte response to pathological forces.....................................................................15

CHAPTER III CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................................................17

CHAPTER IV REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................................18

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease characterized by pain, cartilage loss, and joint stiffness. Although OA has long been considered to be primarily a cartilage disorder associated with focal articular cartilage degradation, this disease is accompanied by welldefined changes in the subchondral and periarticular bone, including sclerosis and cyst and osteophyte formation
(1)

. Osteoarthritis (OA) represents a clinical classification of

pathological conditions involving a progressive degeneration of articular cartilage, a remodelling of sub-chondral bone and a synovitis which is usually limited. The condition is variously described as a part of a process of age-related change or a disease. It is twice as prevalent in women than men and increases in incidence with age, there being a major rise after 60 years (2). It is believed that the changes that lead to the development of OA are slow (insidious). That in idiopathic OA clinical presentation may result from changes over 15-20 years. The disease may involve primarily one or two large joints or may be generalized. Following joint trauma there is an increased incidence of OA (2). The importance of the bone changes in the initiation and progression of OA is still being debated. It has been suggested that increased subchondral bone stiffness reduces the ability to dissipate the load and distribute the strain generated within the joint. This increases peak dynamic forces in the overlying articular cartilage and can accelerate its damage over time
(3)

. The functional

integrity of the articular cartilage can therefore depend on the mechanical properties of the underlying bone. Accordingly, cartilage damage leads to full-thickness cartilage loss only upon repetitive loading over an already stiffened subchondral bone plate (4). Recent studies have demonstrated increased subchondral bone turnover accompanied by specific architectural changes in the subchondral trabecular bone in OA joints
(7) (5,6)

Furthermore, epidemiologic studies have clearly documented increased subchondral bone sclerosis with disease progression . These observations suggested a role for subchondral

bone changes in the initiation and progression of OA, raising the possibility that early intervention that reduces bone sclerosis might retard the progressive loss of articular cartilage.

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

2.1 ANATOMY
Composition of diarthrodial

joint components To fully comprehend the effect of chondrocyte metabolism on joint integrity and its role in synthesis of multiple proteins involved in joint homeostasis, we first discuss the main components of normal diarthrodial cartilage, joints: synovial articular fluid,

subchondral bone and the synovial membrane.

Articular cartilage composition Articular cartilage, or hyaline cartilage, is designed to bear and distribute loads on the bone surfaces inside joints, and is composed of a solid phase, including the extracellular matrix (ECM) and chondrocytes, and a fluid phase, the interstitial fluid, containing water and small electrolytes, which are primarily Na+ and Cl-.(8) The ECM consists of a highly hydrated collagen network and of proteoglycan aggregates. The interstitial fluid contains water and ions. Less than 5% of the tissue volume of cartilage consists of chondrocytes, that are responsible for maintaining the homeostasis with regard to the cartilage components.(9) Chondrocytes represent the only cell type inside articular cartilage, as cartilage tissue is not vascularised or innervated. The collagen network consists primarily of collagen type II fibrils, and also contains minor amounts of type I, V, IX and XI fibrils.(10) Collagen is an important contributor to the tensile
3

properties of the cartilage, where proteoglycans attract electrolytes in the interstitial fluid to generate a swelling pressure and to resist compressive loads.(11) Thus, the solid components of cartilage have a low permeability for water, while there is continuous interaction with water through covalent, ionic and hydrogen bonding, resulting in a high interstitial fluid pressurisation, which is essential for adequate distribution of the loads inside the joint.8 Proteoglycans consist of a core protein to which one or more glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chains are attached. The most abundant proteoglycan in articular cartilage is the large aggregating aggrecan, having numerous GAGs attached to its long core protein, mainly chondroitin sulphate (CS) and keratan sulphate (KS).(12) Another GAG in articular cartilage is hyaluronan (HA), which has its major function in synovial fluid viscosity. (13) Proteoglycan molecules form aggregates by binding to hyaluronic acid molecules, and together with collagen they form the dense ECM network.(11) Smaller, nonaggregating proteoglycans in articular cartilage are for instance fibromodulin, decorin and biglycan.(14,15) The articular cartilage surface, also called the superficial or tangential zone, encompass 1020% of the articular cartilage thickness and has the highest collagen and interstitial fluid content.(8,9)In this zone, the collagen fibrils are arranged parallel to the articular surface, creating a low compressive modulus, meaning that this layer is easily deformed.(11) Chondrocytes in the surface zone produce relatively little proteoglycans, and synthesise more collagen type II and smaller proteins with lubricating and protective functions, such as the superficial zone protein (SZP).(16,17) The middle zone of the articular cartilage accounts for 40-60% of the cartilage thickness.7 Collagen fibrils in this zone are thicker and packed more loosely than in the superficial zone, and are obliquely oriented to the cartilage surface. The compressive modulus of the tissue is higher in this layer.(11) The radial or deep zone fills 30% of the cartilage thickness and contains collagen fibrils with a large diameter that are oriented perpendicular to the surface.(9)This layer has the highest compressive modulus and also contains the most proteoglycans, and less water, compared to the other zones.(8,11) Chondrocytes in this zone are 10- fold more synthetically active than in the superficial zone.(18)

Below the deep zone is a layer of calcified cartilage, which contains rather collagen type X than collagen type II, and here is also the tide mark, which lays directly on the subchondral bone.(19) As already mentioned, chondrocytes synthesise the cartilage compounds with varying ratios in the distinct zones, and these cell populations are therefore very heterogeneous, also with regard to size and shape, according to their position in the cartilage. Besides, the behaviour of chondrocytes is influenced by the age, pathology or mechanical stress of the surrounding cartilage,(20) which will be further discussed in the section about the effect of joint loading on chondrocyte metabolism .

Subchondral bone composition Directly below the calcified cartilage layer and the tide mark is the interface with the subchondral bone plate, which separates the articular cartilage from the bone marrow.(19) Below this dense bone plate is a subarticular spongiosa, with its trabecular or plate-like bone structures enclosing spaces between them. Near the subchondral bone-cartilage interface, these spaces are very narrow, and deeper in the bone they are considerably enlarged. Articular cartilage is supported by the underlying bone in both a biomechanical and biochemical way.(21)Biomechanically, the rigid bone, mainly composed of collagen type I, gives strength support to the soft and compression-sensitive articular cartilage, and attenuates the loads to a much greater extent than cartilage.(19) The quality of subchondral bone directly influences the response of cartilage to load, which is illustrated by the effect of an increased
5

bone density, which often leads to OA, because bone with a higher density is very stiff and lays more load on the articular cartilage, resulting in cartilage damage.(22) Subchondral bone is highly vascularised, especially in regions that experience considerable mechanical load. Cartilage has no blood supply, but exchange of nutrient solutions is possible between subchondral bone and articular cartilage by crossing of blood vessels into the calcified cartilage layer through openings in the bone at the subchondral interface.(19,21) If a region in the calcified cartilage is devoid of blood vessel entry from the subchondral bone plate, the chondrocytes in this region are dependent on diffusion of nutrients from the synovial fluid through the cartilage matrix, which is also the case for the superficial, middle and deep cartilage zones. Synovial fluid composition The joint cavity of diarthrodial joints is filled with synovial fluid, which is a dialysate of blood plasma containing additional proteins that are synthesised in synoviocytes and chondrocytes. Synovial fluid has various functions, including cartilage lubrication, and facilitation of transport of nutrients, waste products, enzymes, cytokines, growth factors and morphogens to maintain joint homeostasis and to allow communication between distinct cell populations within the joint. Since synovial fluid is a dialysate of blood plasma, the major protein components are identical, except for the larger plasma proteins, because the synovial membrane hinders these from entering the synovial fluid compartment.(23) Albumin, as well as 1, , 1 and 2 globulins and transferrins are the major protein components of synovial fluid.(24) There are also pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors present, which have important roles in regulation of the local cell populations.(23) Additionally, synovial fluid contains several lubricant molecules that are synthesised and secreted by synoviocytes or chondrocytes, including HA and proteoglycan-4 (PRG-4).(23) HA is a GAG that contributes to the viscosity of the synovial fluid, and thereby prevents fluid outflow to maintain the synovial volume, and the two variants of PRG-4, SZP and lubricin, are glycoproteins that mediate boundary lubrication of the articular cartilage.(13,17) SZP is uniquely expressed in chondrocytes in the superficial zone of cartilage, and lubricin and HA are synthesised by fibroblast-like synoviocytes at the luminal surface of the synovial membrane.(17,25,26) There are also few leukocytes, lymphocytes, macrophages and macrophagic synoviocytes in the synovial fluid.(23,27) Macrophagic synoviocytes are of bone marrow origin and can
6

phagocytose cell debris and other wastes, and have an antigenpresenting function.(26,27) Synovial fluid further contains matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), amounts of a distintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), that are produced by chondrocytes and synoviocytes, and together determine the extent of ECM maintenance and breakdown in the articular cartilage.(28) The synovial fluid is in direct contact with the articular surface and with the synovial membrane, and, in some joints, also with the meniscus and with ligaments. Therefore, in various arthropathies, major changes occur to the synovial fluid composition, which is exacerbated by or contributes to the pathology. In most arthropathies, including OA, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and posttraumatic arthritis, the protein concentration in the synovial fluid is increased, and larger proteins are present inside the fluid as well.(24) This points to a changed permeability of the synovial membrane during disease.(23) Thus, the synovial membrane plays important roles in maintaining the joint homeostasis as well. Synovial membrane composition The synovial membrane is composed of two layers, including an outer vascularised and innervated fibrous capsule which contains fibroblasts, macrophages, adipocytes and mast cells, and an inner layer, the synovial intima, that covers the outer layer.(26,27) The intima contains the earlier mentioned fibroblast-like synoviocytes, which are specialised to synthesise HA, and the macrophagic synoviocytes, within an ECM composed of collagen, HA and proteoglycans.(23,27) As described above, the permeability of the synovial membrane is the main determinant of plasma protein and water entry into the synovial fluid, but this barrier also retains the larger synovial fluid contents that are synthesised inside the joint, including lubricin, SZF and HA.(23) Thus, the synovial membrane physically and functionally lines the joint edge and provides a homeostatic environment to the cartilage, the subchondral bone and the synovial fluid. In RA patients, the synovial membrane dramatically increases in mass and metabolic activity due to hyperplasia of the intima cells, leading to a change in synovial membrane permeability. The entry of larger plasma proteins into the synovial fluid has been associated with synovial inflammation, which is characteristic for RA.(29) Indeed, in OA and in other aetiologies of arthritis, there are changes in synovial membrane permeability as well, but to a much lesser extent than in RA.(30)

2.2 Physiological bases of bone regeneration .


1. REMODELING PHASES Bone remodeling can be divided into the following phases : quiescent, activation, resorption, formation, mineralization. 1.1 Quiescent phase: said of the bone when at rest. The factors that initiate the remodeling process remain unknown. 1.2 Activation phase: the first phenomena that occurs is the activation of the bone surface prior to resorption, through the retraction of the bone lining cells (elongated mature osteoblasts existing on the endosteal surface) and the digestion of the endosteal membrane by collagenase action. Once exposed, the mineralized surface attracts the circulating osteoclasts coming from the nearby vessels. 1.3 Resorption phase: the osteoclasts then begin to dissolve the mineral matrix and decompose the osteoid matrix. This process is completed by the macrophages and permits the release of the growth factors contained within the matrix, fundamentally transforming growth factor beta (TGF-), platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), insulin-like growth factor I and II (IGF-I and II). 1.4 Formation phase: simultaneously in the resorbed areas the preosteoblast grouping phenomena is produced, attracted by the growth factors liberated from the matrix which act as chemotactics and in addition stimulate their proliferation . The preosteoblasts synthesize a cementing substance upon which the new tissue is attached, and express bone morphogenic proteins (BMP) responsible for differentiation. A few days later, the already differentiated osteoblasts synthesize the osteoid material which fills the perforated areas. 1.5 Mineralization phase: mineralization begins thirty days after deposition of the osteoid, ending at 90 days in the trabecular and at 130 days in the cortical bone. The quiescent or at rest phase then begins again.

The balance between bone resorption and formation is influenced by such interrelated factors as genetic, mechanical, vascular, nutritional, hormonal and local.

2.3 General changes in bone in osteoartritis


OA involves not only the degeneration of articular cartilage leading to eburnation of bone but also a synovitis that is usually limited. There is extensive re-modelling of subchondral bone resulting in the so-called sclerosis of this tissue observed radiographically. These bone changes are often accompanied by the formation of sub-chondral cysts as a result of focal resorption.The bone changes may also be systemic in nature. The work of Dequeker and his colleagues
(31)

has produced evidence of changes in bone metabolism in sites such as

the iliac crest which are suggestive of systematic changes. Analyses of the molecular composition of OA bone have provided indications of fundamental changes in bone metabolism (32). Deoxypyridinoline cross-links, resulting from bone resorption, are elevated in urine (33) as is osteocalcin elevated in serum (34). There is evidence from scintigraphy to indicate that changes in bone metabolism are identifiable several years prior to evidence for clinical onset of the disease
(35-37)

. Whether

these changes precede those in cartilage remains to be determined once comparable analyses can be made of metabolic changes in cartilage metabolism. The dynamic interplay between bone and cartilage is reflected in how changes in one tissue may influence the other and thus determine the development of OA. Bone cells from OA patients can alter chondrocyte metabolism
(38)

. This is most strikingly observed in

osteoporosis, where bone density is reduced by excessive osteoclastic resorption of bone. Patients with osteoporosis usually show little or no evidence of OA. Moreover, patients with OA do not usually develop osteoporosis (39-41). These observations may be explainable in part at the level of biomechanical interactions, indicating that reduced bone density may protect against degeneration leading to OA. A principle anatomical feature of OA is the development of osteophytes. The osteophytes, which have a cap of articular cartilage, and an actively remodelling bone base, may serve to reintroduce some stability into an otherwise unstable joint. These form from an endochondral process in sites at the edges of the damaged articular cartilage. Addition to periosteum in culture or injection in vivo of transforming growth factor-beta results in expression of the hypertrophic phenotype by newly formed chondrocytes in periosteal tissue and subsequent mineralization of extracellular matrix
(42, 43).

This is an essential requirement for endochondral ossification. Intra-articular injection of


10

TGF-beta1 induces osteophyte formation

(44)

.Thus TGF-beta, and probably other bone

morphogenetic proteins, may play an important role in osteophyte formation. These bone morphogenetic proteins are also excessively produced in joint inflammation.

2.4 Osteoblasts and osteoarthritis


Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative joint disease characterized by loss and degradation of cartilage, inflammation of the synovium and peri-articular bone alteration consisting of the formation of osteophytes and subchondral bone sclerosis
(45,46).

Radin and

Rose (1986) were the first to suggest the involvement of the subchondral bone in the progression and initiation of cartilage degradation. Successive studies have confirmed this hypothesis and demonstrated the abnormal behaviour and metabolism of OA osteoblasts
(47,47,48,50,51)

Some investigators have examined the molecular basis of bone OA changes by comparing microarray gene expression profiling of bone obtained from individuals with no evidence of joint disease and from individuals with degenerative hip OA(52) . Several genes that influence osteoblast function, bone remodelling and mineralization exhibit a different expression in OA. Many of these genes are components of the Wnt and TGF-/BMP signalling pathway. Moreover, a subset of genes are differentially expressed between females and males; this might in part explain the sex disparity in OA. La Jeunesses group has reported elevated alkaline phosphatase activity and increased osteocalcin levels in primary human OA subchondral osteoblasts
(50)

and this data has been


(53,54,55)

confirmed by the results of several clinical ex/in vivo and in vitro studies

Differences in the metabolic response to 1,25(OH) Vitamin D3 stimulation, consisting of a significant increase of osteocalcin after Vitamin D3 treatment, have been found in osteoarthritic osteoblasts, proportional to the degree of joint damage factors (53) . Other investigators have distinguished two different groups of OA osteoblasts: low OA osteoblasts, associated with low levels of prostaglandin E2(PGE2) and IL-6, similar to normal cells, and high OA osteoblasts associated with high levels of PGE2 and IL-6
(58) (53,56,57)

,suggesting that

the abnormal behaviour of OA osteoblasts includes an altered response to systemic or local

11

Recent data have suggested a close relationship between the OPG/RNK/RANKL system and the subchondral bone changes observed in OA. Studies performed on osteoblasts derived from patients with OA have demonstrated an abnormal expression of OPG and RANKL and consequently OPG/RANKL ratio (59,60) .Low OA osteoblasts show a marked decrease in OPG and increased level of RANKL, whereas high OA osteoblasts exhibit a marked increase of OPG and a reduction of RANKL-t
(62) (61)

.Moreover, low and high OA subchondral osteoblasts

express membranous and RANKL isoforms differently and are modulated differently by osteotropic factors .This might explain the different metabolic states of human

subchondral bone osteoblast subpopulations: low OA osteoblasts promote bone resorption, whereas high OA osteoblasts favour bone formation. Recently, human osteoblasts derived from subchondral OA bone have been shown, for the first time, to express ephrin B2 and its receptor EphB4. EphB4 receptor is expressed in OA osteoblasts and its levels are increased in low OA cells but no differences have been observed between normal and high OA cells. Moreover, EphB4 activation by the specific ligand ephrin B2 inhibits the expression of IL-1, IL-6 and RANKL, but not of OPG
(59,60)

. These data suggest that the activation of EphB4 by ephrin B2 affects the abnormal

metabolism in OA subchondral bone by inhibiting resorption factors and their activities. Dequekers group (1993) has demonstrated an elevated production of IGF-I, IGF-II and TGF- in bone explants from the iliac crest of OA patients. The same results have subsequently been obtained in vitro (63) . The altered osteoblast metabolism might also explain the presence of an abnormal mineralization of subchondral bone in OA. Type I collagen levels are elevated in OA bone tissue
(64)

and should lead to excessive mineralization. This might be the reason for the

subchondral bone sclerosis that characterizes OA, even if, in the early stage of disease, this tissue is hypomineralized. A rapid and aggressive OA has recently been demonstrated to develop in the Brittle IV (Brtl) mouse model of osteogenesis imperfecta, which is characterized by a defect in Type I collagen
(65)

. These data confirm the idea that the

alterations in subchondral bone tissue microarchitecture play a key role in the progressive destruction of joint cartilage observed in OA. Human OA osteoblasts present increased collagen type I deposition, but with an altered ratio of 1 and 2 chains, in particular with an increase of the 1 chain. This abnormal production of type I collagen leads to abnormal mineralization and can be correlated with the high levels of TGF- detected in OA
12

osteoblasts (66) .TGF- is a potent inducer of osteophytes and acts directly or via the inhibition of BMP-2-induced mineralization. A human in vitro study has demonstrated the abnormal production of leptin in OA osteoblasts: leptin expression is increased five-fold in OA osteoblasts compared with normal osteoblasts
(67)

.increased production of leptin might be responsible, at least in part, for the

elevated levels of bone markers observed in OA osteoblasts (osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase) and confirms the key role of leptin in OA pathophysiology, as previously demonstrated by the Dumond group (2003).

Biomechanical Aspects

2.5 Ranges of physiological forces on joint cartilage


Human articular cartilage experiences wide ranges of stress and strain during normal joint loading. Studies using cadavaric limbs loaded in simulated gait have shown that stresses in the range of 510 MPa are normal in the hip, corresponding to loads that are 300800% body weight
[67-70]

. In vivo measurements with an instrumented hip endoprosthesis have indicated

that higher stresses are possible (up to 18 MPa) during other physiological movements, especially when muscle forces are high [71] . Accompanying strains during certain regimes of joint loading can also be high. Herberhold et al. [72] reported decreases of approximately 40% in patella cartilage thickness after 30 min of static loading of cadaver joints at 3.6 MPa
[72]

. In loaded areas of knee joints, cartilage

13

thickness recorded at the end of the day was decreased by up to 0.6 mm compared to the start
[73]

. This phenomena was attributed to accumulated fluid loss from the matrix of loaded areas

2.6 Supranormal stress and strain can lead to injury


In contrast to the above normal ranges of joint forces, stress and strain above the physiological range have the potential to damage the matrix and chondrocytes. Acute trauma to the joint is known to increase the risk of osteoarthritis (OA) [74,75] , while destabilization of the knee joint due to anterior cruciate ligament rupture or meniscal damage causes radiographic signs of OA in many patients progression of OA [78] . In vivo studies have shown that impact trauma can cause osteoarthritic changes. Radin et al.
[79-81] [76,77]

. Other mechanical influences that cause

abnormal forces, such as joint laxity, obesity, and muscle weakness, are also linked to the

impacted patellofemoral joints of rabbits, causing damage to the bone and cartilage and

subsequently leading to OA-like degradation. Even impacts that do not appear to fracture the bone can result in cartilage degradation [82] .

2.7 Changes in biomechanical properties with age


As age is the most significant risk factor for OA, many studies have examined how the material properties of cartilage change with age. In individuals without cartilage lesions, cartilage thickness does not decrease significantly with age in men (6%, n.s.), but does decrease in women by approximately 12% (p < 0.05), possibly as a result of the more rapid decrease in muscle forces with age in females
[84] [83]

. Femoral head cartilage shows a large

decrease in tensile stiffness and fracture stress with age, whereas talar cartilage (ankle) shows significantly less degradation in properties . The superficial zone of human condyle

cartilage shows a steady increase in tensile stiffness, peaking in the third decade of life, then decreasing thereafter [85] . Deep-zone stiffness decreases continuously with age. As the collagen network has a very low turnover
[86]

, alterations to it could cause

changes in its mechanical stiffness and fatigue properties, possibly leading to premature breakdown. The presence of various sugars in the body cause cross-linking of proteins via a
14

process called nonenzymatic glycation

[87]

. These cross-links are only significant in tissues

with low turnover where they can build up. In cartilage, the collagen network is affected, leading to the browning of tissue associated with old age [87] .

2.8 Chondrocyte response to mechanical loading


Compression of cartilage causes deformation of cells and matrix, gradients in hydrostatic pressure, intratissue fluid flow, and associated electrokinetic effects (e. g., flow-induced streaming potentials). Since the compressive stiffness of chondrocytes is about three orders of magnitude less stiff than of the surrounding ECM, the cells will deform with the matrix
[89,90] [88]

The deformation of the charged ECM will change ionic concentrations, osmolarity, and pH of the cellular environment according to Donnan equilibrium theory
[91]

. Tissue fluid flow

during loading can also dramatically enhance transport of nutrients and macromolecules (e.g., growth factors and cytokines . Therefore, mechanical and chemical changes during

loading can alter chondrocyte behavior, and hence matrix synthesis and turnover. Areas on joints that are more highly loaded during locomotion generally have a higher proteoglycan content compared to adjacent cartilage experiencing lower stress
[90, 95, 96] [9294]

However, these highly loaded chondrocytes synthesize less total proteoglycan (although the synthesis of certain small proteoglycans, especially decorin, is elevated) . Together,

these findings suggest that less proteoglycans are degraded and lost from the cartilage in these regions. In young and neonatal cartilages, these trends between areas have not been observed, suggesting that the loading itself is responsible for the change in cartilage matrix composition and also the zonal variation in chondrocyte phenotype [94, 97] .

2.9 Chondrocyte response to pathological forces


As mentioned previously, traumatic joint injury has been linked to an increased risk of developing OA in later life. Until recently, little was known about the state of the chondrocytes or ECM macromolecules in the time between injury to human joints and the development of disease. Lohmander et al.
[98]

removed synovial fluid from patients

immediately after an articular cartilage or meniscal tear and up to 15 years postinjury. The synovial fluid samples were analyzed for the presence of degradative enzymes and fragments
15

of enzymatically cleaved or intact matrix molecules. The matrix metalloprotease stromelysin1 (MMP-3) is thought to be one of the major proteolytic enzymes responsible for the normal turnover of ECM molecules and the enhanced turnover during disease. In the days following injury, the level of MMP-3 in the synovial fluid (measured as the latent or proenzyme form) was elevated by 50100 times the level in healthy athletes. These levels decreased with time after injury, but remained almost tenfold higher than in uninjured controls even by 1015 years after injury. Interestingly, the levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease were also elevated after injury. Collagen degradation also occurred soon after injury, as indicated by a 15-fold increase in the amount of MMP up to 15 years after injury, leaved collagen molecules in the synovial fluid
[98]

. Cleavage at this site in the C-telopeptide cross-linking domain indicated

that mature, rather than newly synthesized, collagen molecules were being cleaved and leaving the tissue. Again, these levels remained higher.

16

CHAPTER III CONCLUSION The development of cartilage degeneration is concomitant with subchondral bone thickness in osteoarthritis, whereas it is related to higher subchondral bone activity and dysregulation in the synthesis of bone proteins. As an immediate consequence, homotrimers of type 1 collagen are formed that could lead to undermineralization of this tissue. This dysregulation also leads to abnormal production of different factors by osteoblasts such as prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and growth factors. Because microcracks or neovascularization provide a link between the subchondral bone tissue and articular cartilage, these factors could contribute to the abnormal remodeling of osteoarthritic cartilage. Lastly, it is clear that a prophylactic response may be required immediately after a biomechanical insult, rather than when OA symptoms present themselves. Levels of catabolic cytokines and enzmyes are upregulated almost immediately after injury and stay increased for many subsequent years. Chondrocytes lose their ability to increase biosynthesis of matrix components in response to dynamic compression and die through necrosis and apoptosis. One of the pathways for decreasing the incidence of OA may be ensuring that chondrocyte response to both physiological and pathological mechanical loads is optimized for longterm survival of the cartilage. Recent research has contributed to furthering our knowledge that OA can no longer be considered a disease of a single tissue but is rather a whole joint Borgan failure.We still need to acquire a better understanding of these changes and the biochemical signals and biomechanical aspects between bone and articular cartilage. This in turn will help us to devise better therapeutics aimed at treating not only the consequences but the causes of OA.

17

CHAPTER IV REFERENCES 1. Oettmeier R, Abendroth K. Osteoarthritis and bone: osteologic types of osteoarthritis of the hip. Skeletal Radiol 1989;18:16574. 2. 1. Felson, DT: Epidemiology of the rheumatic diseases. In: Arthritis and allied conditions: A Textbook of rheumatology. 13thEdition. Ed: W.J. Koopman, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, (1997) 3. Radin EL, Rose RM. Role of subchondral bone in the initiation and progression of cartilage damage. Clin Orthop 1986;213:3440. 4. Burr DB, Schaffler MB. The involvement of subchondral mineralized tissues in osteoarthrosis: 1997;37:34357. 5. Burr DB. The importance of subchondral bone in osteoarthrosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1998;10:25662. 6. Goker B, Sumner DR, Hurwitz DE, Block JA. Bone mineral density varies as a function of the rate of joint space narrowing in the hip. J Rheumatol 2000;27:735 8. 7. Lane NE, Nevitt MC. Osteoarthritis, bone mass, and fractures: how are they related? Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:14. 8. Ateshian, G.A. The role of interstitial fluid pressurization in articular cartilage lubrication. Journal of Biomechanics 42, 1163-1176 (2009). 9. Heath, C.A. and Magari, S.R. Mini-review: Mechanical factors affecting cartilage regeneration in vitro. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 50, 430-437 (1996). 10. Lane Smith, R., et al. Effects of shear stress on articular chondrocyte metabolism. Biorheology 37, 95-107 (2000). 11. Pearle, A.D., et al. Basic science of articular cartilage and osteoarthritis. Clinics in Sports Medicine 24, 1-12 (2005). 12. Watanabe, H., et al. Roles of aggrecan, a large chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, in cartilage structure and function. Journal of Biochemistry 124, 687-693 (1998). 13. McDonald, J.N. and Levick, J.R. Effect of intra-articular hyaluronan on pressureflow relation across synovium in anaesthetized rabbits. The Journal of Physiology 485 (Part 1), 179-193 (1995). quantitative microscopic evidence. Microsc Res Tech

18

14. Poole, A.R., et al. Contents and distributions of the proteoglycans decorin and biglycan in normal and osteoarthritic human articular cartilage. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 14, 681-689 (1996). 15. Oldberg, A., et al. A collagen-binding 59-kd protein (fibromodulin) is structurally related to the small interstitial proteoglycans PG-S1 and PG-S2 (decorin). The EMBO Journal 8, 2601-2604 (1989). 16. Flannery, C.R., et al. Articular cartilage superficial zone protein (SZP) is homologous to megakaryocyte stimulating factor precursor and Is a

multifunctional proteoglycan with potential growth-promoting, cytoprotective, and lubricating properties in cartilage metabolism. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 254, 535-541 (1999). 17. Jay, G.D., et al. Homology of lubricin and superficial zone protein (SZP): products of megakaryocyte stimulating factor (MSF) gene expression by human synovial fibroblasts and articular chondrocytes localized to chromosome 1q25. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 19, 677- 687 (2001). 18. Wong, M., et al. Zone-specific cell biosynthetic activity in mature bovine articular cartilage: a new method using confocal microscopic stereology and quantitative autoradiography. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 14, 424-432 (1996). 19. Madry, H., et al. The basic science of the subchondral bone. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 18, 419- 433 (2010). 20. Wilkins, R.J., et al. Chondrocyte regulation by mechanical load. Biorheology 37, 67-74 (2000). 21. Pan, J., et al. In situ measurement of transport between subchondral bone and articular cartilage. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 27, 1347-1352 (2009). 22. Dequeker, J., et al. Bone density and osteoarthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology 43, 98-100 (1995). 23. Hui, A.Y., et al. A systems biology approach to synovial joint lubrication in health, injury, and disease. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine 4, 15- 37 (2012). 24. Levick, J.R. Permeability of rheumatoid and normal human synovium to specific plasma proteins. Arthritis and Rheumatism 24, 1550-1560 (1981). Levick, J.R. Permeability of rheumatoid and normal human synovium to specific plasma proteins. Arthritis and Rheumatism 24, 1550-1560 (1981).

19

25. Schumacher, B.L., et al. A novel proteoglycan synthesized and secreted by chondrocytes of the superficial zone of articular cartilage. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 311, 144-152 (1994). 26. FitzGerald, O. and Bresnihan, B. Synovial membrane cellularity and vascularity. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 54, 511-515 (1995). 27. Iwanaga, T., et al. Morphology and functional roles of synoviocytes in the joint. Archives of histology and cytology 63, 17-31 (2000). 28. Davidson, R.K., et al. Expression profiling of metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in synovium and cartilage. Arthritis Research & Therapy 8, R124 (2006). 29. Kushner, I. and Somerville, J.A. Permeability of human synovial membrane to plasma proteins. Relationship to molecular size and inflammation. Arthritis and Rheumatism 14, 560-570 (1971). 30. Pejovic, M., et al. Determination of the apparent synovial permeability in the knee joint of patients suffering from osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. British Journal of Rheumatology 34, 520-524 (1995). 31. Dequeker, J, Mokassa, L, Aerssens, J, & Boonen, S: Bone density and local growth factors in generalized osteoarthritis.Microscopy Res Tech 37, 358-71 (1997) 32. 4.Mansell, JP & Bailey, AJ: Abnormal cancellous bone collagen metabolism in osteoarthritis. J Clin Invest 101, 1596-1603 (1998) 33. 5.Seibel, MJ, Duncan, A, &. Robins, SP: Urinary hydroxypyridinium cross-links provide indices of cartilage and bone involvement in arthritic disease. J Rheumatol 16, 964-70 (1989) 34. 6.Campion, GV, Delmas, PD, & Dieppe, P: Serum and synovial fluid osteocalcin (bone GLA protein) levels in joint disease. Br J Rheumatol 28, 393-8 (1989) 35. 7.McCarthy, C, Cushnaghan, J, & Dieppe, P: The predictive role of scintigraphy in radiographic osteoarthritis of the hand.Osteoarthritis Cart 2, 25-8 (1994) 36. 8.Dieppe, P, Cushnaghan, J, Young, P, & Kirwan, J: Prediction of the progression of joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis of the knee by bone scintigraphy. Ann Rheum Dis 52, 557-563 (1993) 37. 9.Hutton, CW, Higgs, ER, Jackson, PC, Watt, I, & Dieppe, PA: 99mTc HMDP bone scanning in generalized nodal osteoarthritis. II. The four hour bone scan image predicts radiographic change. Ann Rheum Dis 45, 622-6 (1986)
20

38. 10.Westacott, CJ, Webb, GH., Warnock, MG, Sims, JV, & Elson, CJ: Alteration of cartilage metabolism by cells from osteoarthritic bone. Arthritis Rheum 40, 1282-91 (1997) 39. 11.Marcelli, C, Favier, F, Kotzki, PO, Ferrazi, V, Picot, MC, & Simon, L: The relationship between osteoarthritis of the hands, bone mineral density, and osteoporotic fractures in elderly women. Osteoporosis Int 5, 382-8 (1995) 40. 12.Hart, DJ, Mootoosamy, I, Doyle, DV, & Spector, TC: The relationship between osteoarthritis and osteoporosis in the general population: the Chingford study. Ann Rheum Dis 53, 158-162 (1994) 41. 13.Dequeker, J: Inverse relationship of interface between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 24, 795-8 (1997) 42. 14.O'Driscoll, SW, Recklies, AD, & Poole, AR: Chondrogenesis in perosteal explants. An organ culture model for in vitrostudy. J Bone Jt Surg 76A, 10421051 (1994) 43. 15.Joyce, ME, Roberts, AB, Sporn, MI, & Bolander, ME: Transforming growth factor-beta and the initiation of chondrogenesis and osteogenesis in the rat femur. J Cell Biol 110, 2195-2207 (1990) 44. 16.Van Beuningen, HM, Glansbeek, HL, van der Kraan, PM, & van den Berg, WB: Differential effects of local application of BMP-2 or TGF-beta 1 on both articular cartilage composition and osteophyte formation. Osteoarthritis Cart 6, 306-17 (1998) 45. Davis MA, Ettinger WH, Neuhaus JM, Hauck WW (1988) Sex differences in osteoarthritis of the knee. The role of obesity. Am J Epidemiol 127:10191030 46. Valdes AM, Spector TD (2010) The genetic epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 22:139143. 47. Corrado A, Cantatore FP, Grano M, Colucci S (2005) Neridronate and human osteoblasts in normal, osteoporotic and osteoarthritic subjects. Clin Rheumatol 24:527534 48. Dequeker J, Mohan S, Finkelman RD, Aerssens J, Baylink DJ (1993) Generalized osteoarthritis associated with increased insulin-like growth factor types I and II and transforming growth factor beta in cortical bone from the iliac crest. Possible mechanism of increased bone density and protection against osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum 36:17021708

21

49. El Miedany YM, Mehanna AN, El Baddini MA (2000) Altered bone mineral metabolism in patients with osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine 67:521527 50. Hilal G, Martel-Pelletier J, Pelletier JP, Ranger P, Lajeunesse D (1998) Osteoblast-like cells from human subchondral osteoarthritic bone demonstrate an altered phenotype in vitro: possible role in subchondral bone sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 41:891899 51. Lajeunesse D, Reboul P (2003) Subchondral bone in osteoarthritis: a biologic link with articular cartilage leading to abnormal remodeling. Curr Opin Rheumatol 15:628633 52. Hopwood B, Tsykin A, Findlay DM, Fazzalari NL (2007) Microarray gene expression profiling of osteoarthritic bone suggests altered bone remodelling, WNT and transforming growth factor-beta/ bone morphogenic protein signalling. Arthritis Res Ther 9:R100 53. Cantatore FP, Corrado A, Grano M, Quarta L, Colucci S, Melillo N (2004) Osteocalcin synthesis by human osteoblasts from normal and osteoarthritic bone after vitamin D3 stimulation. Clin Rheumatol 23:490495 54. Hilal G, Massicotte F, Martel-Pelletier J, Fernandes JC, Pelletier JP, Lajeunesse D (2001) Endogenous prostaglandin E2 and insulinlike growth factor 1 can modulate the levels of parathyroid hormone receptor in human osteoarthritic osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res 16:713721 55. Mansell JP, Tarlton JF, Bailey AJ (1997) Biochemical evidence for altered subchondral bone collagen metabolism in osteoarthritis of the hip. Br J Rheumatol 36:1619 56. Corrado A, Cantatore FP, Grano M, Colucci S (2005) Neridronate and human osteoblasts in normal, osteoporotic and osteoarthritic subjects. Clin Rheumatol 24:527534 57. Gevers G, Dequeker J (1987) Collagen and non-collagenous protein content (osteocalcin, sialoprotein, proteoglycan) in the iliac crest bone and serum osteocalcin in women with and without hand osteoarthritis. Coll Relat Res 7:435 442 58. Massicotte F, Lajeunesse D, Benderdour M, Pelletier JP, Hilal G, Duval N, Martel-Pelletier J (2002) Can altered production of interleukin- 1beta, interleukin6, transforming growth factor-beta and prostaglandin E(2) by isolated human

22

subchondral osteoblasts identify two subgroups of osteoarthritic patients? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 10:491500 59. Kwan Tat S, Pelletier JP, Amiable N, Boileau C, Lajeunesse D, Duval N, MartelPelletier J (2008a) Activation of the receptor EphB4 by its specific ligand ephrin B2 in human osteoarthritic subchondral bone osteoblasts. Arthritis Rheum 58:38203830 60. Kwan Tat S, Pelletier JP, Lajeunesse D, Fahmi H, Lavigne M, Martel- Pelletier J (2008b) The differential expression of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL) in human osteoarthritic subchondral bone osteoblasts is an indicator of the metabolic state of these disease cells. Clin Exp Rheumatol 26:295304 61. Tat SK, Padrines M, Theoleyre S, Couillaud-Battaglia S, Heymann D, Redini F, Fortun Y (2006) OPG/membranous-RANKL complex is internalized via the clathrin pathway before a lysosomal and a proteasomal degradation. Bone 39:706 715 62. Tat SK, Pelletier JP, Lajeunesse D, Fahmi H, Duval N, Martel-Pelletier J (2008) Differential modulation of RANKL isoforms by human osteoarthritic subchondral bone osteoblasts: influence of osteotropic factors. Bone 43:284291 63. Massicotte F, Aubry I, Martel-Pelletier J, Pelletier JP, Fernandes J, Lajeunesse D (2006) Abnormal insulin-like growth factor 1 signaling in human osteoarthritic subchondral bone osteoblasts. Arthritis Res Ther 8:R177 64. Mansell JP, Tarlton JF, Bailey AJ (1997) Biochemical evidence for altered subchondral bone collagen metabolism in osteoarthritis of Rheumatol 36:1619 65. Blair-Levy JM, Watts CE, Fiorentino NM, Dimitriadis EK, Marini JC, Lipsky PE (2008) A type I collagen defect leads to rapidly progressive osteoarthritis in a mouse model. Arthritis Rheum 58:10961106 66. Couchourel D, Aubry I, Delalandre A, Lavigne M, Martel-Pelletier J, Pelletier JP, Lajeunesse D (2009) Altered mineralization of human osteoarthritic osteoblasts is attributable to abnormal type I collagen production. Arthritis Rheum 60:1438 1450 67. Bergmann G., Graichen F. and Rohlmann A. (1993) Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J. Biomech. 26: 969990 the hip. Br J

23

68. Afoke N. Y., Byers P. D. and Hutton W. C. (1987) Contact pressures in the human hip joint. J. Bone Joint. Surg. Br. 69: 536541 69. Eisenhart R. von, Adam C., Steinlechner M., Muller-Gerbl M. and Eckstein F. (1999) Quantitative determination of joint incongruity and pressure distribution during simulated gait and cartilage thickness in the human hip joint. J. Orthop. Res. 17: 532539 70. Adams D. and Swanson S. A. (1985) Direct measurement of local pressures in the cadaveric human hip joint during simulated level walking. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 44: 658666 71. Hodge W. A., Carlson K. L., Fijan R. S., Burgess R. G., Riley P. O., Harris W. H. and Mann R. W. (1989) Contact pressures from an instrumented hip endoprosthesis. J. Bone Joint. Surg. Am. 71: 378386 72. Herberhold C., Faber S., Stammberger T., Steinlechner M., Putz R., Englmeier K. H. et al. (1999) In situ measurement of articular cartilage deformation in intact femoropatellar joints under static loading. J. Biomech. 32:12871295 73. Waterton J. C., Solloway S., Foster J. E., Keen M. C., Gandy S., Middleton B. J. et al. (2000) Diurnal variation in the femoral articular cartilage of the knee in young adult humans. Magn. Reson. Med. 43: 126132 74. Davis M. A., Ettinger W. H., Neuhaus J. M., Cho S. A. And Hauck W. W. (1989) The association of knee injury and obesity with unilateral and bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee. Am. J. Epidemiol. 130: 278288 75. Gelber A. C., Hochberg M. C., Mead L. A., Wang N. Y., Wigley F. M. and Klag M. J. (2000) Joint injury in young adults and risk for subsequent knee and hip osteoarthritis. Ann. Intern. Med. 133: 321328 76. Roos H., Adalberth T., Dahlberg L. and Lohmander L. S. (1995) Osteoarthritis of the knee after injury to the anterior cruciate ligament or meniscus: the influence of time and age. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 3: 261267 77. Kannus P. and Jarvinen M. (1989) Posttraumatic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency as a cause of osteoarthritis in a knee joint. Clin. Rheumatol. 8: 251 260 78. Felson D. T., Lawrence R. C., Dieppe P. A., Hirsch R., Helmick C. G., Jordan J. M. et al. (2000) Osteoarthritis: new insights. The disease and its risk factors. Ann. Intern. Med. 133: 635646

24

79. Radin E. L., Parker H. G., Pugh J. W., Steinberg R. S., Paul I. L. and Rose R. M. (1973) Response of joints to impact loading. III. Relationship between trabecular microfractures and cartilage degeneration. J. Biomech. 1: 5157 80. Radin E. L., Ehrlich M. G., Chernack R., Abernethy P., Paul I. L. and Rose R. M. (1978) Effect of repetitive impulsive loading on the knee joints of rabbits. Clin. Orthop. 131: 288293 81. Radin E. L., Martin R. B., Burr D. B., Caterson B., Boyd R. D. and Goodwin C. (1984) Effects of mechanical loading on the tissues of the rabbit knee. J. Orthop. Res. 2: 221234 82. Newberry W. N., Garcia J. J., Mackenzie C. D., Decamp C. E. and Haut R. C. (1998) Analysis of acute mechanical insult in an animal model of post-traumatic osteoarthrosis. J. Biomech. Eng. 120: 704709. 83. Eckstein F., Reiser M., Englmeier K. and Putz R. (2001) In vivo morphometry and functional analysis of human articular cartilage with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging from image to data, from data to theory. Anat. Embryol. 203: 147173 84. Kempson G. E. (1991) Age-related changes in the tensile properties of human articular cartilage: a comparative study between the femoral head of the hip joint and the talus of the ankle joint. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1075: 223230 85. Kempson G. E. (1982) Relationship between the tensile properties of articular cartilage from the human knee and age. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 41: 508511 86. Maroudas A. and Venn M. (1977) Chemical composition and swelling of normal and osteoarthrotic femoral head cartilage. II. Swelling. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 36: 399 406 87. Verzijl N., DeGroot J., Oldehinkel E., Bank R. A., Thorpe S. R., Baynes J. W. et al. (2000) Age-related accumulation of Maillard reaction products in human articular cartilage collagen. Biochem. J. 350: 381387 88. 45 Guilak F., Jones W. R., Ting-Beall H. P. and Lee G. M. (1999) The deformation behavior and mechanical properties of chondrocytes in articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 7: 5970 89. 46 Gray M. L., Pizzanelli A. M., Grodzinsky A. J. and Lee R. C. (1988) Mechanical and physiochemical determinants of the chondrocyte biosynthetic response. J. Orthop. Res. 6: 777792

25

90. 47 Schneiderman R., Keret D. and Maroudas A. (1986) Effects of mechanical and osmotic pressure on the rate of glycosaminoglycan synthesis in the human adult femoral head cartilage: an in vitro study. J. Orthop. Res. 4: 393408 91. 48 Bhakta N. R., Garcia A. M., Frank E. H., Grodzinsky A. J., and Morales T. I. (2000) The insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) I and II bind to articular cartilage via the IGF-binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 58605866 92. 49 Slowman S. D. and Brandt K. D. (1986) Composition and glycosaminoglycan metabolism of articular cartilage from habitually loaded and habitually unloaded sites. Arthritis Rheum. 29: 8894 93. 50 Murata K. and Yokoyama Y. (1987) Dermatan sulfate isomers in human articular cartilage characterized by high performance liquid chromatography. Biochem. Int. 15: 8794 94. 51 Little C. B. and Ghosh P. (1997) Variation in proteoglycan metabolism by articular chondrocytes in different joint regions is determined by post-natal mechanical loading. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 5: 4962 95. 52 Grushko G., Schneiderman R. and Maroudas A. (1989) Some biochemical and biophysical parameters for the study of the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: a comparison between the processes of ageing and degeneration in human hip cartilage. Connect. Tissue. Res. 19:149176 96. 53 Ghosh P., Read R., Numata Y., Smith S., Armstrong S. and Wilson D. (1993) The effects of intraarticular administration of hyaluronan in a model of early osteoarthritis in sheep. II. Cartilage composition and proteoglycan metabolism. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 22: 3142 97. 54 Howard S. and Anastassiades T. (1993) Differential effects of bone associated factors on newly synthesized anionic glycoconjugates by articular chondrocyte cultures from adult and immature bovines. J. Rheumatol. 20: 20832094 98. 64 Lohmander L. S., Hoerrner L. A., Dahlberg L., Roos H., Bjornsson S. and Lark M. W (1993) Stromelysin, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases and proteoglycan fragments in human knee joint fluid after injury. J. Rheumatol. 20: 13621368

26

Вам также может понравиться