Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
an Emerging
Trend
Green
Building
in the Pacic Northwest:
OFFICE OF
SUSTAINABILITY
AND THE PUBLIC
POLICY CENTER
OFFICE OF
SUSTAINABILITY
AND THE PUBLIC
POLICY CENTER
Published
February, 2010
This report provides important and timely feedback on the perceptions of
developers, design professionals, the construction industry and members
of government within our local cities and counties. The impact of the built
environment is signicant, and this report outlines critical factors necessary
for market transformation: namely education, incentives and a holistic and
integrated approach to design and construction. We have the opportunity
to use this information to overcome barriers and establish common ground
to create more sustainable buildings with lower lifecycle costs and healthier
indoor environments that benet rather than burden our society.
Sharon Patterson
Chair of the Board, USGBC Idaho Chapter, LEED AP BD+C and Homes
The report is a thorough overview of many issues confronting the green
building market as it continues to grow and mature. It clearly illustrates
how the simple concept of sustainability has layers of complexity when the
various stakeholders look at it from their own perspective. The snapshot
it presents provides guidance to anyone who is attempting to apply
sustainable concepts to the built environment.
Bruce Poe, AIA, LEED AP
Modus Architecture
Boise State University
Principal Investigators:
SUSAN MASON, PhD, Director
Community and Regional Planning
Graduate Programs; Assistant Professor,
Public Policy and Administration;
Assistant Professor, Political Science
ANTHONY MARKER, PhD, LEED AP,
Assistant Professor, Instructional &
Performance Technology
REBECCA MIRSKY PhD, PE, LEED
AP, Associate Professor, Construction
Management
Students and Sta
KRISTOF BIHARI
SARAH CUELLAR
CATHERINE DICKINSON
ALICIA DILLON
MIKE JOURNEE
CHRIS LATTER
TWYLA PERKINS
ZULFIRA PULATOVA
MICHAEL ROGERS
JACQUELINE SPRATT
KEVIN TAYLOR
Research Sponsors
AVISTA
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITYS OFFICE OF
SUSTAINABILITY
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITYS PUBLIC
POLICY CENTER
CAPITAL CITY DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
CITY OF BOISE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
CITY OF BOISE PUBLIC WORKS
ENERGY POLICY INSTITUTE
IDAHO POWER
URBAN LAND INSTITUTE-IDAHO
DISTRICT COUNCIL
T
his report provides an understanding of why green building is important to
our communities, a brief look at the emergence of green building standards,
research evidence on the perceived pros and cons of green building, and original
research on green building in the Pacic Northwest. The original research is
an analysis of perspectives voiced in conversations, focus groups and surveys
with both members of the construction industry and local government on the
barriers and incentives to green building in their local communities. As nearly 500
construction industry members and just over 300 local governments participated
in the research, this report encompasses, perhaps for
the rst time, one of the largest examinations of the
aggregated voices of both the public and private sector
on factors that aect green building. Green house gas
emissions from commercial buildings are growing at a
faster than average annual rate 1.8% higher than either
transportation or residential emission rates. This trend
alone provides strong justication to take a close look at
the factors that may help change this dynamic.
Faculty and graduate students in the College
of Social Sciences and Public Aairs and
the College of Engineering assembled this
report. It consolidates information to provide a
deeper understanding of green building issues
and opportunities facing Pacic-Northwest
communities. The report provides both municipalities and construction
professionals information that may foster their green building goals.
Members of both groups indicate they want to engage in green building,
but in a nancially viable way. This report is a starting point for formally
identifying the next steps for making green building more likely.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the generosity of the sponsors
who made this research possible.
Paper used for the production of this report is FSC Certied.
OFFICE OF
SUSTAINABILITY
AND THE PUBLIC
POLICY CENTER
2
6 Figure 1: Mr. Ames, 9th grade physics student built a
27 x 27 X 27 cube
17 Table 1: Summary of Main Points from Reviewed
Research
18 Table 2: Ranking Values for Focus Group Responses
19 Table 3: City Planners and Public Works Professionals
Ranking of Factors that Encourage Green Building
19 Table 4: City Planners and Public Works Professionals
Ranking of Incentives that Encourage Green Building
20 Table 5: City Planners and Public Works Professionals
Ranking of Barriers to Green Building
20 Table 6: City Planners and Public Works Professionals
Ranking of Tools that Encourage Green Building
21 Table 7: Members of the Development Communitys
Ranking of Factors that Encourage Green Building
21 Table 8: Members of the Development Communitys
Ranking of Incentives that Encourage Green Building
22 Table 9: Members of the Development Communitys
Ranking Barriers to Green Building
22 Table 10: Members of the Development Communitys
Ranking of Tools that Encourage Green Building
23 Table 11: Comparison of the Top Five Factors for
Developers and Cities
25 Table 12: City and County Survey Response Rate by
State
26 Table 13: Construction Professional Survey Response
Rate by State
26 Table 14: Mayor/County Commissioner Support for
Green Building Practices
27 Table 15: Cities Perceptions of the Awareness of
Green Building by Developers
27 Table 16: Community Factors that Support Green
Building
29 Table 17: Use of Economic Tools to Promote Green
Building
29 Table 18: Policy and Guidelines for Green Building
30 Table 19: Factors and their degree of inuence on
green building policy
31 Table 20: Sta and LEED AP Accredited Sta by City,
County and MSA
32 Figure 2: Top Five Barriers for Green Building
32 Figure 3: Top Five Incentives for Green Building
33 Figure 4: Top Five Barriers for LEED
33 Figure 5: Top Five Incentives for LEED
35 Figure 6: Top Five Barriers
35 Figure 7: Top Five Incentives
37 Table 21: Summary of Construction Industry Survey
Data
38 Table 22: Adoption Level and Strategy
39 Table 23: Construction Industry Members and Stage
of Adoption
List of Tables and Figures
Figures and Tables
55
Contents
LxecuLlve Summury
SLuLemenL of Lhe Problem
1he Lmergence of Creen 8ulldlng und RuLlng
SysLems
WhuL ls Reully Known AbouL Lhe Pros und
Cons of Creen 8ulldlng Reseurch Lvldence
Reseurch MeLhods und llndlngs
locus Crous
Survey Purose Audlence und MeLhod
Locul CovernmenL Survey llndlngs und
Anulysls
ConsLrucLlon lndusLry Survey llndlngs und
Anulysls
NexL SLes
References
Aendlces
Aendlx ACreen 8ulldlng Survey
Aendlx 8ConsLrucLlon lndusLry Member
Survey
LlsL of 1ubles und llgures lnslde 8uck Cover
Next Steps for
an Emerging
Trend
Green
Building
in the Pacifc Northwest:
33. I have a large social and prof essional network that includes people outside my local area.
I strongly
disagree
I
disagree
I somewhat
disagree
I neither agree or
disagree
I somewhat
agree
I
agree
I strongly
agree
I dont know I pref er not to say
Section B: Demographics
The f ollowing demographic questions will help us better understand who has responded to our survey. We will combine your answers with those of
everyone else to give us a big picture view of the professionals involved in the construction industry regarding green building practices. We will not
identif y individuals. If there are any questions you do not wish to answer you may leave them blank; however, it will aid in our analysis if you would mark,
I pref er not to say, on the survey.
34. What is the highest degree either of your parents have earned:
High School
Associates Degree
Bachelors Degree
Technical Certif icate
Masters Degree
Doctoral Degree
Post-Graduate Certif ications
I dont know.
I pref er not to say.
35. I participate in prof essional and social organization f unctions:
Never 1-2 times per year 3-4 times per year 5-6 times per year 1-2 per month 3-4 times per month 5-6 times per month
I dont know I pref er not to say
36. I travel f or prof essional purposes (e.g., business trips and conf erences):
Never 1-2 times per year 3-4 times per year 5-6 times per year 1-2 per month 3-4 times per month 5-6 times per month
I dont know I pref er not to say
37. I have contact with outreach representatives of organizations promoting green building practices:
Never 1-2 times per year 3-4 times per year 5-6 times per year 1-2 per month 3-4 times per month 5-6 times per month
I dont know I pref er not to say
38. Highest Level of Education you have completed:
High School
Associates Degree
Bachelors Degree
Technical Certif icate
Post-Graduate Certif ications
Masters Degree
Doctoral Degree
I dont know.
I pref er not to say.
39. Mark the main media sources you use f or inf ormation more than once a week, this would include both hardcopy and electronic sources:
Newspaper
Prof essional Blogs
Newsletters
Television
Podcasts
Internet video and radio
Books
Magazines
Trade Journals
Academic Journals
Webinars
Other ______________________
I dont know.
I pref er not to say.
40. Mark the methods of communication you use multiple times during the week:
Email
Telephone
Cell Phone
Text Messaging
Social Networking Sites
Online Discussion Boards
Face-to-Face meetings
Teleconf erencing
Video Conf erencing
Other ______________________
I dont know.
I pref er not to say.
42. Please estimate your annual income:
Less than $20,000
More than $20,000 but less than $30,000
More than $30,000 but less than $40,000
More than $40,000 but less than $50,000
More than $50,000 but less than $75,000
More than $75,000 but less than $100,000
$100,000 or more
I dont know.
I pref er not to say.
20. am seeing obvious benef its to my use of green building practices both in terms of building perf ormance and in terms of financial results.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
22. actively encourage my colleagues and peers to adopt green building practices.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
23. At which of the f ollowing stages of adoption would you expect to f ind most construction prof essionals with regard to green building
practices in general?
Unaware: Not yet aware of green building practices
Curious: Aware but dont yet have much information about green building
practices
Envisioning: knowledgeable but want to see them in action bef ore they try them
Tryout: Ready to actively get training on green building so they can use it on the
job
Using it: Already using it and want or need support to maintain its use
I dont know.
pref er not to say.
24. At which of the f ollowing stages of adoption would you expect to f ind most city planners with regard to using LEED certification
standards specif ically?
Unaware: Not yet aware of LEED building practices
Curious: Aware but dont yet have much information about LEEDb uilding practices
Envisioning: knowledgeable but want to see them in action bef ore they try them
Tryout: Ready to actively get training on LEED building so they can use it on the job
Using it: Already using it and want or need support to maintain its use
I dont know.
pref er not to say.
25. enjoy experimenting with new technology even when do not need to.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
26. am NOT very concerned about the well-being of f uture generations.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
dont know pref er not to say
27. am conf ident that science and technology actively benef it humanity.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
28. enjoy working through complex problems with no clear or immediate solution.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
29. aggressively seek more inf ormation about green building practices.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
30. can clearly imagine complex goals and the path to reach them.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
31. My prof essional colleagues DO NOT regularly seek my opinion about new developments in our f ield.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I don t know pref er not to say
32. There is still a great deal more have yet to accomplish in my prof essional lif e.
strongly somewhat neither agree or somewhat strongly
Appendix B
disagree disagree disagree disagree agree agree agree
I dont know I pref er not to say
C
reen bulldlng rucLlces use
envlronmenLully frlendly muLerluls
or sysLems ulled ln u hollsLlc und
lnLegruLed urouch Lo deslgn und
consLrucLlon Leudershl ln Lnergy
und LnvlronmenLul Leslgn LLLL ls one ruLlng
sysLem und one of only Lwo Creen Clobes belng
Lhe oLher LhuL huve been develoed by ugencles
uccredlLed by Lhe Amerlcun NuLlonul SLundurds
lnsLlLuLe PRNewswlreUSNewswlre 1he lurge
body of reseurch LhuL exlsLs on LLLLcerLled
bulldlngs mukes LLLL u useful frume of reference Lo
undersLund more ubouL green bulldlng ln generul us
well us LLLLcerLled bulldlngs seclcully
Reseurch reveuls LhuL on some green or LLLL
cerLled develomenL ro|ecLs Lhe ufronL cosLs
muy be hlgher buL noL neurly us hlgh
us unecdoLul evldence suggesLs 8elng
selecLlve ubouL Lhe susLulnuble deslgn crlLerlu und
feuLures used ln u bulldlng cun kee consLrucLlon
wlLhln budgeL und roduce greuLer longLerm
energy conservuLlon lncororuLlng green bulldlng
Lechnlques from Lhe lnceLlon of u ro|ecL und ln u
hollsLlc munner cun reduce cosLs us well us furLher
ussure beneLs wlll be used und reullzed by owner
und LenunLs ullke lumlllurlLy wlLh green bulldlng
sLundurds rovldes greuLer undersLundlng of cosLs
und beneLs lessenlng reslsLunce Lo green bulldlng
LducuLlon for bullders owners und LenunLs wlll go u
long wuy Lo encouruge green bulldlng
LuLu druwn from focus grous conducLed ln
8olse lduho und surveys wlLh clLles ln Lhe Puclc
NorLhwesL lduho Oregon ULuh und WushlngLon
reveul heulLhler bulldlngs und soclul resonslblllLy
ure currenLly Lhe blggesL lncenLlves for encouruglng
develoers Lo enguge ln green bulldlng rucLlces
whlle cosLs und uncerLulnLy ubouL reLurn on
lnvesLmenL ure Lhe blggesL burrlers ClLles wunLlng
Lo uddress Lhe blggesL burrlers see nunclul
lncenLlves us Lhe key Lo romoLlng green bulldlng
ln Lhe shorL Lerm Over Lhe long huul clLles see
educuLlon ubouL Lhe beneLs und rucLlces of green
bulldlng us essenLlul Lo ensurlng Lhe deslred reLurn
on Lhe lnvesLmenL und meeLlng communlLy gouls
u ersecLlve shured by develoers
1hls uer recommends severul besL rucLlces
ldenLled from u revlew of reseurch und lnLervlews
conducLed for Lhls reorL us well us from Lhe new
emlrlcul evldence guLhered here 1he sLruLegles
LhuL follow muy be urorluLe for communlLles
ln Lhe Puclc NorLhwesL lnLeresLed ln romoLlng
und suorLlng green bulldlng rucLlces 1he
recommenduLlons full lnLo four broud cuLegorles
LhuL lnvolve rovldlng
MurkeLlng Lo lncreuse ubllc demund for green
bulldlng
Pollcles und rocesses Lo suorL nunclul
uybuck for develoers
lnformuLlon demonsLruLlons und Lrulnlng Lo
encouruge Lhe udoLlon of green bulldlng
SuorL for currenL users of green bulldlng und
LLLL cerLlcuLlon Lo conLlnue Lhelr use und
udvocucy of green bulldlng
AlLhough Lhe bulk of Lhe leudershl for Lhe
recommenduLlons fulls on Lhe clLles success
ln meeLlng green bulldlng gouls wlll be besL
uccomllshed Lhrough ubllc und rlvuLe
urLnershls LhuL enuble boLh clLles und develoers
Lo lnlLluLe und udvunce green bulldlng rucLlces a
This report provides data from conversations, focus groups, and surveys with both
members of the construction industry and local governments about their perspectives
on the barriers and incentives for green building in their communities, primarily, in the
Pacifc Northwest. Nearly 500 construction industry members and just over 300 local
governments participated in the research, providing one of the largest and perhaps
the frst studies of the aggregated voices for both the public and private sector on
factors that afect green building.
Executive Summary
This report
consolidates
information
to provide
a deeper
understanding
of green
building
issues and
opportunities
facing Pacifc-
Northwest
communities.
Executive Summary
7. f requently hear my colleagues and peers talking about green building practices.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
8. understand green building practices are.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
9. am 127 considering enrolling in a certif ication course f or a set of green building practices.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
10. enjoy working with green building practices.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
11. regularly discuss green building practices with my colleagues and peers.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
12. think green building practices have signif icant f inancial and environmental benef its f or our current society and f uture generations.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
13. would personally like to see the practice of green building practices expanded.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
14. f eel that have all the knowledge, resources, and support need to implement green building practices in the f uture.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
15. '2127 intend to f ind more inf ormation about green building practices.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
16. intend to try applying green building practices on a project.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
17. have earned certif ication in a set of green building practices and intend to seek out additional inf ormation to aid in my use of them.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
18. am currently using green building practices on a regular basis.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
19. '2127 plan to continue to use green building practices in the f uture.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
1.5
Figure 1
What does
a ton of CO2
look like?
Containing a
metric ton of
invisible CO2
(2,204 pounds)
would require a
cube container
measuring 27
feet by 27 feet
by 27 feet, a
total of 19,683
cubic feet.
Right: Ninth
grade physics
students built
this model to
scale.
3ource: rllp://WWW.erer-
gyrace.cor/correrlary/
Wral_does_a_lor_ol_co2_
|oo|_|||e/
W
e conLlnue Lo Luke sLes Lo ussess
und reduce our envlronmenLul
lmucL SecreLury of veLeruns
Aulrs Lrlc K Shlnsekl suld
Lnsurlng Lhe susLulnublllLy of our
fuclllLles ucross Lhe counLry hels us uccomllsh our
rlmury mlsslon servlng veLeruns PRNewswlre
USNewswlre
How does meeLlng green bulldlng sLundurds
ensure susLulnublllLy Or more lulnly why
should we cure ubouL bulldlng emlsslons Curbon
dloxlde ls by fur Lhe mosL rollc comonenL of ull
greenhouse gus emlsslons seclcully uccounLlng
for mllllon of Lhe mllllon of meLrlc Lons
of curbon dloxlde equlvulenL M1CLL generuLed
ln Lhe US ln more Lhun ercenL of
Lhe green house gus emlsslons US Lnergy
lnformuLlon AdmlnlsLruLlon LlA And
resldenLlul und commerclul bulldlngs comblne Lo
uccounL for ercenL of ull energy consumLlon
und energyreluLed greenhouse gus emlsslons
unnuully muklng Lhem un obvlous focus of
greenhouse gus emlsslon reducLlon eorLs
1runsorLuLlon und lndusLry ure Lhe oLher mu|or
secLors of energy use buL nelLher conLrlbuLes us
much us bulldlngs Lo greenhouse gus emlsslons
LlA
Whlle Lhere ls no uveruge bulldlng Lo ullow for
comurlsons one wuy Lo Lhlnk ubouL Lhe lssue ls
by uslng LnvlronmenLul ProLecLlon Agency LPA
esLlmuLes whlch suy LhuL burnlng one gullon of
gusollne generuLes ubouL ounds of CO 8y
1
Erergy use accourled lor 5,91Z VTC0E ol lre ,021 VTC0E gerer-
aled |r 200Z (ElA, 2009)
16. What are the most important incenti ves that encourage the adoption of green building in the city? (PLEASE CHECK
THE TOP FIVE)
Expedited revi ews (of green projects) High profile champions locally
Healthi er buildings Marketability of green buildings
Reduced impact fees Public outreach/education
Bank promoting green loans and/ or appraisals Social Responsibility
Recognition for builders and devel opers Lower life-cycle costs
Citizens interest Increased longevity of buildi ngs
Codes that encourage green buil ding Political vision
Higher density/bonus and offsets for green building Regul ations that provide predictability
(risk mitigation) Trained staff with green building expertise
Education resources Financial payback
(Education materials and traini ng) Reduce Carbon
Neighboring city did not adopt green buil ding policies Other___________________________
LEED Certification
17. What are the most important barriers to LEED certifi ed buildi ng in the city? (PLEASE CHECK THE TOP FIVE)
Confusion among green building programs Misrepresentation green washing
Availability of certified resources for green buildi ng Lack of regulat ory flexibility
Paperwork load Bad economy
Resistance by industry and trade uni ons Lack of consumer education
Process uncertainty Need for new suppliers
Building code issues and interpretation of codes Learning curve costs
Percei ved costs Compl exity of certification
Cost (real ) up front vs. Return on investment Lack of demand for green buil dings
Other___________________________
18. What are the most important incenti ves that encourage the adoption of LEED certificati on in the city? (PLEASE
CHECK THE TOP FIVE)
Expedited revi ews (of green projects) High profile champions locally
Healthi er buildings Marketability of LEED buil dings
Reduced fees in general Public outreach/education
Bank promoting green loans and/ or appraisals Social Responsibility
Recognition for builders and devel opers Lower life-cycle costs
Citizens Interest Increased longevity of buildi ngs
Codes that encourage green buil ding Political vision
Higher density/bonus and offsets for green building Regul ations that provide predictability
(risk mitigation) LEED certification as a brand adds value
Education resources Trained staff with green building expertise
(Education materi als and training) Reduce Carbon
Financial payback Other___________________________
19. Are there any topics not treated in this questionnaire that you feel are important for understandi ng more about what
makes green building practices more accepted by and accessible to cities, developers, planners and other stakehol ders ?
If so, please provide the information below or use additional sheets, if necessary.
A
luyerson mlghL suy LhuL u green
bulldlng uses envlronmenLullyfrlendly
muLerluls or sysLems or erhus LhuL
Lhe develoer lncororuLed rocesses
Lo reduce resource consumLlon
durlng consLrucLlon 1hough Lhese ure lmorLunL
churucLerlsLlcs erhus Lhe mosL owerful usecL
of u green deslgn ln Lhe bullL envlronmenL ls
LhuL rucLlLloners uly u hollsLlc und lnLegruLed
urouch Lo deslgn und consLrucLlon And Lhough
we muy huve veered from such urouches ln recenL
hlsLory Lhe conceL ucLuully duLes buck Lhousunds
of yeurs Lo Lhe orlgln of Lhe musLer bullder MosL
of clvlllzuLlons slgnlcunL works of urchlLecLure
from Lhe yrumlds of LgyL Lo Lhe clusslc cuLhedruls
of Luroe were deslgned und bullL by Lhe musLer
bullder Llnsmore 1hese bullderurchlLecLs
hud u furreuchlng vlew of Lhe enLlre bulldlng
from deslgn Lhrough consLrucLlon und llfeLlme
oeruLlons lncororuLlng funcLlonul usslve deslgns
for heuLlng coollng und llghLlng 1oduy Lhese
e clenL usslve deslgn feuLures whlch conslder
cllmuLlc seLLlng und solur orlenLuLlon ure mulnsLuys
of whuL ls consldered Lo be green bulldlng und
feuLure sLrongly ln Loduys green bulldlng ruLlng
schemes
Long before Lhe Lh cenLury however Lhe
musLer bullder hud ull buL dlsueured reluced
by deslgnerurLlsLs who recelved urchlLecLurul
commlsslons buL hud llLLle undersLundlng of Lhe
bulldlng urLs As Lhe seuruLlon of urchlLecLurul
deslgn und consLrucLlon becume more dlsLlncL
u new buslness enLerrlse emerged LhuL of Lhe
generul bulldlng conLrucLor Llnsmore
SLurLlng ln Lhe s Lhe uvullublllLy ln Lhe US
of cheu fossll fuels surred Lhe develomenL of
glussundsLeel sLrucLures LhuL could be heuLed
und cooled wlLh musslve heuLlng venLlluLlon und
ulr condlLlonlng sysLems Creen8ulldlngcom
New bulldlng Lechnologles lncludlng ulr
condlLlonlng lowwuLLuge uorescenL llghLlng
sLrucLurul sLeel und reecLlve gluss ullowed
urchlLecLs develoers und generul conLrucLors Lo
eschew Lhe LlmeLesLed meLhods of Lhe musLer
bullders ln fuvor of Lhese energy lnLenslve
Lechnologles
The Emergence of Green
Building and Rating Systems
Almost every day, in every major news outlet, there is some mention of the achievements
of a new green building. But there are still many people who are unsure of what really
makes a building green. This section talks about the defning characteristics of green
building design and construction, the origins of green design, and a brief history of how
we have arrived at todays standards and the LEED rating system.
3,000 B.C. 1,200 A.D.
1930 A.D. 1970 A.D.
Green Building and Rating Systems 3,000 B.C. to 2009 A.D.
Pyramids to Cathedrals -- Master builders
of antiquity were responsible for design
and lifetime construction.
Forward-thinking
architects,
environmentalists,
ecolgists begin
questioning
advisability of
energy intensive
building practices. Oil prices spike, calling
attention to nations use of fossel fuels.
Glass-and-steel structures
that could be heated
and cooled with massive
heating, ventilation, and air
conditioning systems
9. Has your city established policies or gui deli nes governi ng green buil ding? (PLEASE CHECK ONE)
No
Yes, informal/ unwritten (e.g., gi ven more leeway or considerati on)
Yes, formal/written (e.g., adopted as part of a comprehensi ve pl an or functional plan)
Dont Know/ Not sure
10. How important are the foll owi ng factors in terms of actually influencing policy on green buildi ng in your
city? Using the scale to the right, please indicate how much influence, if at all, the following factors
have on green buil ding policy in the city. (PLEASE CIRCLE THE BEST RESPONSE)
11. Is there a lead office or personnel speci fically responsible for green buildi ng proj ects or activities in the city? (PLEASE
CHECK ONE)
Yes
No
Dont Know/ Not sure
12. How many public works personnel or pl anners work speci fically for the city? (CIRCLE A NUMBER or 00
if you Dont Know) Dont Know
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+ 00
13. How many support staff are there for the public works personnel or planners that work for the city?
(CIRCLE A NUMBER or 00 if you Dont Know) Dont Know
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+ 00
14. How many of the staff are accredited as a LEED AP? (CIRCLE A NUMBER or 00 if you Dont Know)
Dont Know
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+ 00
15. What are the most important barriers to the use of green buildi ng practices in the city? (PLEASE CHECK THE TOP
FIVE)
Confusion among green building programs Misrepresentation green washing
Availability of certified resources for green buildi ng Lack of regulat ory flexibility
Cost to retrofit existing buildi ngs Bad economy
Resistance by industry and trade uni ons Lack of consumer education
Process uncertainty Need for new suppliers
Building code issues and interpretation of codes Learning curve costs
Percei ved costs Compl exity of certification
Cost (real ) up front vs. Return on investment Lack of demand for green buil dings
Neighboring city did not adopt green buil ding policies Other___________________________
-Please turn the page over and continue the survey-
No Very Strong Dont
Influence Influence Know
a. Federal guidance on green buildi ng 1 2 3 4 5 0
b. State guidance on green building 1 2 3 4 5 0
c. International Code Council (ICC) or other code drafting body 1 2 3 4 5 0
d. Other neighboring cities engaging in green buildi ng 1 2 3 4 5 0
e. Other neighboring cities not engaging in green buildi ng 1 2 3 4 5 0
f. The championi ng of green buil ding by local business leaders 1 2 3 4 5 0
g. The support for green building by elected officials 1 2 3 4 5 0
h. Risk associated with getting the new code standard wrong 1 2 3 4 5 0
i. Risk that the current technol ogy is incorrect 1 2 3 4 5 0
j. Devel oper pushback (threat that they will take development
elsewhere to avoid new standards)
1
2
3
4
5
0
k. Political pushback from developers (encouraging l eaders not
to adopt new standards)
1
2
3
4
5
0
l. The implications of green buildi ng on global warmi ng 1 2 3 4 5 0
m. The Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) Mayors agreement 1 2 3 4 5 0
Appendix A
Appendix A
Green Building Survey
As our communities develop it is important to understand why some green buildi ng practices are more accepted by and
accessible to cities, developers, planners and other stakeholders. Your responses to this questionnaire are important for
understanding more about green buildi ng practices and standards which may affect the way our communities grow.
As you complete the survey please keep in mind that green building is a term used to describe materials and methods
that result in buil dings that use less energy, water, and resources; generate less waste; have l ess impact on the buil ding
site; and offer healthier indoor environments for the occupants.
Section A. General Questions
The following are general questions about factors that may influence a citys engagement in green buil ding practices.
1. Does your city Mayor support green building practices? (PLEASE CHECK ONE)
Does not Somewhat Neither supports Somewhat Supports Dont Know/
Support does not nor supports Not Sure
support does not support
2. How aware are most developers in your city with regard to green buil ding practices in general?
(PLEASE CHECK ONE)
Unaware: Not yet aware of green buildi ng practices
Curious: Aware but dont yet have much information about green buil ding practices
Envisioning: knowl edgeable but want to see them in action before they try them
Tryout: Ready to actively get traini ng on green buildi ng so they can use it on the j ob
Using it: Already using it and want or need support to maintai n its use
Dont Know/ Not Sure
3. How aware are most developers in your city with regard to using LEED certi fication standards
specifically? (PLEASE CHECK ONE)
Unaware: Not yet aware of LEED building practices
Curious: Aware but dont yet have much information about LEED buildi ng practices
Envisioning: knowl edgeable but want to see them in action before they try them
Tryout: Ready to actively get traini ng on LEED building so they can use it on the job
Using it: Already using it and want or need support to maintai n its use
Dont Know/ Not Sure
Section B. Community Factors
The following questions are about local resources and information available that may influence green buil ding practi ces.
4. Is there a supplier of LEED certi fied materi als such as wood withi n a 500 mile radius of your city?
(PLEASE CHECK ONE)
Yes
No
Dont Know/ Not sure
5. Is there a developer or architect in your city that is familiar with and promotes green buildi ng?
(PLEASE CHECK ONE)
Yes
No
Dont Know/ Not sure
6. Are there buil dings in your city that are formally recognized as green buildi ngs that are not LEED certifi ed (e.g., Earth
Advantage, EnergyStar, Net Zero) in your city? (PLEASE CHECK ONE)
Yes 6a. (If yes, approximately how many) ___________
No
Dont Know/ Not sure
Appendix A
References
8ude M leuslblllLy sLudy for u green bulldlng ollcy for Lhe UnlverslLy of Cullfornlu Preured by
Mlchuel 8ude Oce of Lhe PresldenL Leslgn ConsLrucLlon Servlces Muy
8lrL 8 Newshum C PosLoccuuncy evuluuLlon of energy und lndoor envlronmenL quullLy ln
green bulldlngs A revlew hLLwwwnrccnrcgccuob|lrcdocubsnrccdf
8ourlund L lncremenLul cosL meusuruble suvlngs LnLerrlse green communlLles crlLerlu
ReLrleved from hLLwwwgreenblzcomreseurchreorLlncremenLulcosL
meusurublesuvlngs
8ulldlng Leslgn und ConsLrucLlon WhlLe uer on susLulnublllLy Reed 8uslness lnformuLlon
November
Cole R Creen bulldlngs und gruy occuunLs Puer resenLed uL Lhe AlAUSC8C Conference on
MulnsLreumlng Creen ChuLLunoogu 1N OcLober
Llnsmore H RoberL 1r 1he unclenL musLer bullder un essuy MusLerbullder lellowshl for Lhe 8ullL
LnvlronmenL lnc hLLwwwmusLerbullderfellowshlcomugehLml
LormunL L lmlemenLlng Humun Performunce 1echnology ln orgunlzuLlons ln H SLolovlLch L
Kees Lds Hundbook of humun erformunce Lechnology nd ed Sun lrunclsco
CA 1ossey8ussPfeler
llsk W HeulLh und roducLlvlLy gulns from beLLer lndoor envlronmenLs und Lhelr lmllcuLlons for
Lhe US LeurLmenL of Lnergy Proceedlngs of Lhe Lvlslon Conference OcLober
WushlngLon LC
Creen8ulldlngcom Creen bulldlng Llmellne urchlved hLLweburchlveorg
webhLLwwwgreenbulldlngcomgreenHlsLoryhLml
Heerwugen 1 Creen bulldlngs orgunlzuLlonul success und occuunL roducLlvlLy 8ulldlng Reseurch
und lnformuLlon
lnLervlews lnLervlews conducLed by 1ony Murker und Susun Muson durlng All lnLervlewees
were ussured condenLlullLy und Lherefore ure noL noLed by nume
1eson 1r L 1 1he udoLlon of susLulnuble develomenL ollcles und Lechnlques ln US clLles how
wlde how dee und whuL role for lunners 1ournul of Plunnlng LducuLlon und Reseurch
Focus Groups
locus grous were conducLed ln 8olse lduho
wlLh Lwo key sLukeholder urLles clLy lunners
und ubllc works rofesslonul us well us bulldlng
develoers und owners 1he goul wus Lo exumlne
Lhe dlerences und commonullLles ln Lhe resonses
beLween Lhe focus grous wlLh Lhe ob|ecLlve of
evenLuully undersLundlng more ubouL Lhe lncenLlves
und burrlers Lo green bulldlng for boLh clLles und Lhe
develomenL communlLy
Focus Group Questions
locus grou urLlclunLs were usked Lo resond Lo
Lhe followlng quesLlons wlLhln Lhe conLexL of green
bulldlng rucLlces ln generul und Lhen for LLLL
cerLlcuLlon sLundurds seclcully
WhuL ure Lhe overull fucLors LhuL encouruge
green bulldlng
WhuL lncenLlves or lnformuLlon encouruge Lhe
udoLlon of green bulldlng
WhuL ure Lhe seclc burrlers Lo Lhe udoLlon of
green bulldlng rucLlces
WhuL Lools or suorL would encouruge you Lo
udoL green bulldlng rucLlces
Are Lhere uny oLher Lhlngs LhuL mlghL lmucL
Lhe udoLlon of green bulldlng rucLlces
Focus Group Methodology
An uduLuLlon of nomlnul grou Lechnlque ls used
us un ulLernuLlve Lo brulnsLormlng us our rocess
for collecLlng resonses Lo Lhe ubove oenended
quesLlons AL Lhe end of Lhe rocess Lhere ls u
rlorlLlzed llsL of soluLlons or recommenduLlons
Seclcully ufLer Lhe concluslon of euch focus
grou we LubuluLed Lhe resulLs of Lhe runklngs
uccordlng Lo Lhe followlng scheme
1he olnLs for euch fucLor were Lhen udded und
Lullled Lo come u wlLh Lhe nul runklng us shown ln
Lhe Lubles followlng
Focus Group Results
1o geL un lnlLlul lcLure of Lhe oLenLlul dlerences
und commonullLles of clLy rofesslonuls und
bulldlng develoers four focus grous were
conducLed Lhe rsL Lwo wlLh clLy lunners und
ubllc works ersonnel und Lhe second Lwo wlLh
develoers consLrucLlon lndusLry members und
urchlLecLs Luch Lye of sLukeholder hud Lwo
seuruLe focus grous Luch grou generuLed
Lhelr own ldeus und runklngs As u resulL Lhe ldeus
fucLors generuLed by Lhe seuruLe focus grous
for euch of Lhe quesLlons ofLen do noL muLch
exucLly Where Lhey dld muLch exucLly Lhe resulLs
were comblned Where Lhere wus uny slgnlcunL
dlerence le LducuLlon und Consumer
LducuLlon Lhey ure lefL seuruLe 1he followlng
Lubles show resonses Lo euch of Lhe quesLlons
llsLed rsL by hlghesL olnL vulue und second
where olnLs were equul ulhubeLlcully
City Projessiono/s Ouestion Whot ore the
overo// joctors thot encouroge green bui/ding
ClLy lunners und ubllc works rofesslonuls hud
u broud sreud of resonses on Lhls quesLlon us
lndlcuLed by Lhe muny lLems wlLh low score LoLuls
As u resulL Lhere were fewer fucLors LhuL sLood ouL
Research Methods and Findings
In conducting original research, focus groups and interviews were used to develop survey
questions that would provide empirical evidence to better sort out the barriers and
incentives that exist for green building and LEED initiatives.
To get an initial
picture of
the potential
diferences and
commonalities of
city professionals
and building
developers, four
focus groups
were conducted.
Table 2: Ranking Values for Focus Group Responses
Analysis
ln summury clLy rofesslonuls ndlngs reveul Lhe
lurgesL MSAs Lend Lo huve more cuuclLy for green
bulldlng Lhun clLles und counLles slnce Lhey huve
Neurly unlversul suorL from Lhelr muyors
Leveloers uslng Lhe rucLlces
Access Lo LLLL cerLled muLerluls of sLu
Leveloers und urchlLecLs romoLlng green
bulldlng
NonLLLL green bulldlngs ln Lhelr communlLles
Creen bulldlng gouls ollcles und guldellnes
A leud erson or oce resonslble for green
bulldlng
More ubllc works und lunnlng und suorL
sLu
AlLhough some of Lhls such us number of
ersonnel muy be u funcLlon of Lhe slze of Lhe core
clLles of MSAs lL ls noLeworLhy LhuL Lhey ure |usL
us llkely us clLles und neurly us llkely counLles Lo
lndlcuLe Lhey do noL romoLe green bulldlng 1hose
LhuL do romoLe green bulldlng reorL uslng Lhe
sume Lools LhuL clLles und counLles noLe MSAs ulso
show no greuLer Lendency overull Lo use Lux credlLs
fee reducLlon grunLs louns or nunclul uwurds for
green bulldlng Lhun clLles und counLles
lor Lhe mosL urL MSAs clLles und counLles ure
slmllur us well ln Lerms of fucLors LhuL lnuenced
Lhelr greenbulldlng ollcy However Lhe wuys
ln whlch MSAs dler from clLles und counLles
ure noLeworLhy llrsL federul guldunce ls more
lmorLunL Lo green bulldlng ollcy uL Lhe MSA level
whlle clLles und counLles ure more ln Lune wlLh Lhe
lnLernuLlonul Code Councll or oLher code drufLlng
bodles 1he suorL of elecLed ocluls ulso Lends Lo
resonuLe more wlLh MSAs Lhun clLles und counLles
llnully Lhe lmllcuLlons of globul wurmlng und Lhe
ClLles for CllmuLe ProLecLlon AgreemenL ure cleurly
more lmorLunL Lo u mu|orlLy of MSAs us comured
Lo Lhe frucLlon of clLles und counLles LhuL reorLs
Lhese lLems huvlng un lnuence on green bulldlng
ollcy a
L
L
L
u
Survey Purpose,
Audience and Method
lollowlng Lhe focus grou evuluuLlon Lwo surveys
were deslgned Lo exumlne green bulldlng rucLlces
ln Lhe NorLhwesL 1o obLuln erceLlons from key
sLukeholder grous on green bulldlng develomenL
lncenLlves und burrlers Lhls sLudy mukes use of duLu
from Lhe Lwo surveys one for lunners und ubllc
works rofesslonuls und Lhe oLher for Lhe urchlLecLs
und consLrucLlon rofesslonuls
1hls secLlon of Lhe reorL rovldes un unulysls of
1he rlmury duLu collecLed uL Lhe clLy level und
Lhe ndlngs from LhuL duLu
1he counLy duLu und lurgesL MSAs by
uggreguLed resonses
1he uggreguLed lndlvlduul level duLu for Lhe
consLrucLlon lndusLry members und lduho
urchlLecLs
Local Government Survey, Findings
and Analysis
1he locul governmenL survey wus develoed ufLer
u hundful of lnLervlews wlLh lunnlng dlrecLors ln
lduho Oregon und WushlngLon und wlLh focus
grous ln lduho LhuL lncluded locul lunners und
ubllc works ersonnel 1he locul governmenL
survey quesLlons were ulso modeled from surveys
revlously used by Suhu und PuLerson und
1eson und were reLesLed wlLh selecLed
lnLervlewees for clurlLy 1he survey wus senL Lo
lunnlng dlrecLors ln clLles wlLh u ouluLlon of
or more ln lduho Oregon ULuh und WushlngLon
us well us ull of Lhe counLles ln Lhose four sLuLes ln
uddlLlon Lhe survey wus ulso senL Lo clLy lunners
ln Lhe core clLles of Lhe lurgesL MeLroollLun
SLuLlsLlcul Areus MSAs ucross Lhe UnlLed SLuLes
Lo beLLer undersLund Lhe wuy lurge und smull clLles
ln Lerms of ouluLlon muy dler or be slmllur
A remlnder leLLer wlLh u uer coy of Lhe survey
wus mulled uroxlmuLely Lhree weeks luLer
Plunnlng dlrecLors were ulso conLucLed by hone Lo
encouruge survey resonses 1he overull resonse
ruLe wus ercenL wlLh of Lhe clLles und
ercenL or of counLles resondlng Lo Lhe
survey 1uble rovldes Lhe breukdown by sLuLe for
clLles und counLles where lduho demonsLruLes Lhe
hlghesL resonse ruLe uL ercenL for clLles und
ercenL for counLles und ULuh Lhe lowesL uL
ercenL for clLles und ercenL for counLles 1he
overull resonse ruLe for Lhe core clLles of Lhe
lurgesL MSAs wus ercenL wlLh of clLles
reLurnlng Lhe surveys
Tre or|y d|llererce |r lre c|ly ard courly surveys Was lre lrsl
quesl|or Was crarged lror C|ly Vayor lo Courly Corr|ss|orer.
Add|l|ora||y lre Word 'c|ly Was suosl|luled W|lr 'courly lor lre
courly survey quesl|ors. Tre lop 101 V3As rece|ved lre exacl
sare survey as lre lour slale c|ly survey.
Perhus even
more lnLeresLlng ls LhuL u slgnlcunL orLlon of
clLles counLles und MSAs do
Research Methods and Findings
Table 20: Staf and LEED AP Accredited Staf by City, County, and MSA
A signifcant
portion of cities,
counties and
MSAs did not
know how many
LEED AP staf they
may have.
Z
A LEE0 accred|led proless|ora| |s soreore Wro ras passed ar
exar, s|gra||rg ar advarced |eve| ol |roW|edge |r greer ou||d|rg
pracl|ces |r gerera| ard LEE0 cerl|lcal|or requ|rererls |r
parl|cu|ar.
Economic Tools
AlLhough Lhe mu|orlLy of clLles counLles und MSAs
reorLed huvlng romoLed green bulldlng uslng
economlc Lools Lo fosLer green bulldlng wus lnfrequenL
ucross clLles counLles und MSAs us seen ln 1uble
ResondenLs ln clLles counLles und MSAs only noLed
uslng ve Lools reluLlvely frequenLly or frequenLly
1hese more frequenLly reorLed Lools unllke Lhe
oLher economlc develomenL Lools such us grunLs fee
reducLlon und Lux credlLs ure reluLlvely lnexenslve
Lo use
Policy Considerations
ln Lerms of green bulldlng belng u goul or rlorlLy for
u clLy u mu|orlLy of Lhe clLles lndlcuLed lL wus noL und
ercenL of clLles lndlcuLed Lhey hud noL esLubllshed
lnformul or formul guldellnes governlng green bulldlng
SevenLy ercenL of counLles ln Lhe sLudy dld noL huve
green bulldlng gouls or rlorlLles und u full ercenL
dld noL huve guldellnes or esLubllshed ollcles for green
bulldlng ln conLrusL Lo Lhe four sLuLe clLles und counLles
Lhe lurgesL MSAs ull lndlcuLed LhuL green bulldlng wus
u goul or rlorlLy und ercenL hud formul or wrlLLen
gouls und rlorlLles for green bulldlng YeL ercenL of
Lhe lurgesL MSAs dld noL huve elLher lnformul or formul
ollcles or guldellnes governlng green bulldlng however
u mu|orlLy dld huve formul or wrlLLen ollcles or
guldellnes on green bulldlng
Although the majority of
cities, counties and MSAs
reported having promoted
green building, using economic
tools to foster green building
was infrequent across cities,
counties and MSAs
Economic Tools
AlLhough Lhe mu|orlLy of clLles counLles und MSAs
reorLed huvlng romoLed green bulldlng uslng
economlc Lools Lo fosLer green bulldlng wus lnfrequenL
ucross clLles counLles und MSAs us seen ln 1uble
ResondenLs ln clLles counLles und MSAs only noLed
uslng ve Lools reluLlvely frequenLly or frequenLly
1hese more frequenLly reorLed Lools unllke Lhe
oLher economlc develomenL Lools such us grunLs fee
reducLlon und Lux credlLs ure reluLlvely lnexenslve
Lo use
Policy Considerations
ln Lerms of green bulldlng belng u goul or rlorlLy for
u clLy u mu|orlLy of Lhe clLles lndlcuLed lL wus noL und
ercenL of clLles lndlcuLed Lhey hud noL esLubllshed
lnformul or formul guldellnes governlng green bulldlng
SevenLy ercenL of counLles ln Lhe sLudy dld noL huve
green bulldlng gouls or rlorlLles und u full ercenL
dld noL huve guldellnes or esLubllshed ollcles for green
bulldlng ln conLrusL Lo Lhe four sLuLe clLles und counLles
Lhe lurgesL MSAs ull lndlcuLed LhuL green bulldlng wus
u goul or rlorlLy und ercenL hud formul or wrlLLen
gouls und rlorlLles for green bulldlng YeL ercenL of
Lhe lurgesL MSAs dld noL huve elLher lnformul or formul
ollcles or guldellnes governlng green bulldlng however
u mu|orlLy dld huve formul or wrlLLen ollcles or
guldellnes on green bulldlng
Although the majority of
cities, counties and MSAs
reported having promoted
green building, using economic
tools to foster green building
was infrequent across cities,
counties and MSAs
Tre or|y d|llererce |r lre c|ly ard courly surveys Was lre lrsl
quesl|or Was crarged lror C|ly Vayor lo Courly Corr|ss|orer.
Add|l|ora||y lre Word 'c|ly Was suosl|luled W|lr 'courly lor lre
courly survey quesl|ors. Tre lop 101 V3As rece|ved lre exacl
sare survey as lre lour slale c|ly survey.
Perhus even
more lnLeresLlng ls LhuL u slgnlcunL orLlon of
clLles counLles und MSAs do
Research Methods and Findings
Table 20: Staf and LEED AP Accredited Staf by City, County, and MSA
A signifcant
portion of cities,
counties and
MSAs did not
know how many
LEED AP staf they
may have.
Z
A LEE0 accred|led proless|ora| |s soreore Wro ras passed ar
exar, s|gra||rg ar advarced |eve| ol |roW|edge |r greer ou||d|rg
pracl|ces |r gerera| ard LEE0 cerl|lcal|or requ|rererls |r
parl|cu|ar.
Survey Purpose,
Audience and Method
lollowlng Lhe focus grou evuluuLlon Lwo surveys
were deslgned Lo exumlne green bulldlng rucLlces
ln Lhe NorLhwesL 1o obLuln erceLlons from key
sLukeholder grous on green bulldlng develomenL
lncenLlves und burrlers Lhls sLudy mukes use of duLu
from Lhe Lwo surveys one for lunners und ubllc
works rofesslonuls und Lhe oLher for Lhe urchlLecLs
und consLrucLlon rofesslonuls
1hls secLlon of Lhe reorL rovldes un unulysls of
1he rlmury duLu collecLed uL Lhe clLy level und
Lhe ndlngs from LhuL duLu
1he counLy duLu und lurgesL MSAs by
uggreguLed resonses
1he uggreguLed lndlvlduul level duLu for Lhe
consLrucLlon lndusLry members und lduho
urchlLecLs
Local Government Survey, Findings
and Analysis
1he locul governmenL survey wus develoed ufLer
u hundful of lnLervlews wlLh lunnlng dlrecLors ln
lduho Oregon und WushlngLon und wlLh focus
grous ln lduho LhuL lncluded locul lunners und
ubllc works ersonnel 1he locul governmenL
survey quesLlons were ulso modeled from surveys
revlously used by Suhu und PuLerson und
1eson und were reLesLed wlLh selecLed
lnLervlewees for clurlLy 1he survey wus senL Lo
lunnlng dlrecLors ln clLles wlLh u ouluLlon of
or more ln lduho Oregon ULuh und WushlngLon
us well us ull of Lhe counLles ln Lhose four sLuLes ln
uddlLlon Lhe survey wus ulso senL Lo clLy lunners
ln Lhe core clLles of Lhe lurgesL MeLroollLun
SLuLlsLlcul Areus MSAs ucross Lhe UnlLed SLuLes
Lo beLLer undersLund Lhe wuy lurge und smull clLles
ln Lerms of ouluLlon muy dler or be slmllur
A remlnder leLLer wlLh u uer coy of Lhe survey
wus mulled uroxlmuLely Lhree weeks luLer
Plunnlng dlrecLors were ulso conLucLed by hone Lo
encouruge survey resonses 1he overull resonse
ruLe wus ercenL wlLh of Lhe clLles und
ercenL or of counLles resondlng Lo Lhe
survey 1uble rovldes Lhe breukdown by sLuLe for
clLles und counLles where lduho demonsLruLes Lhe
hlghesL resonse ruLe uL ercenL for clLles und
ercenL for counLles und ULuh Lhe lowesL uL
ercenL for clLles und ercenL for counLles 1he
overull resonse ruLe for Lhe core clLles of Lhe
lurgesL MSAs wus ercenL wlLh of clLles
reLurnlng Lhe surveys
L
L
L
u
Analysis
ln summury clLy rofesslonuls ndlngs reveul Lhe
lurgesL MSAs Lend Lo huve more cuuclLy for green
bulldlng Lhun clLles und counLles slnce Lhey huve
Neurly unlversul suorL from Lhelr muyors
Leveloers uslng Lhe rucLlces
Access Lo LLLL cerLled muLerluls of sLu
Leveloers und urchlLecLs romoLlng green
bulldlng
NonLLLL green bulldlngs ln Lhelr communlLles
Creen bulldlng gouls ollcles und guldellnes
A leud erson or oce resonslble for green
bulldlng
More ubllc works und lunnlng und suorL
sLu
AlLhough some of Lhls such us number of
ersonnel muy be u funcLlon of Lhe slze of Lhe core
clLles of MSAs lL ls noLeworLhy LhuL Lhey ure |usL
us llkely us clLles und neurly us llkely counLles Lo
lndlcuLe Lhey do noL romoLe green bulldlng 1hose
LhuL do romoLe green bulldlng reorL uslng Lhe
sume Lools LhuL clLles und counLles noLe MSAs ulso
show no greuLer Lendency overull Lo use Lux credlLs
fee reducLlon grunLs louns or nunclul uwurds for
green bulldlng Lhun clLles und counLles
lor Lhe mosL urL MSAs clLles und counLles ure
slmllur us well ln Lerms of fucLors LhuL lnuenced
Lhelr greenbulldlng ollcy However Lhe wuys
ln whlch MSAs dler from clLles und counLles
ure noLeworLhy llrsL federul guldunce ls more
lmorLunL Lo green bulldlng ollcy uL Lhe MSA level
whlle clLles und counLles ure more ln Lune wlLh Lhe
lnLernuLlonul Code Councll or oLher code drufLlng
bodles 1he suorL of elecLed ocluls ulso Lends Lo
resonuLe more wlLh MSAs Lhun clLles und counLles
llnully Lhe lmllcuLlons of globul wurmlng und Lhe
ClLles for CllmuLe ProLecLlon AgreemenL ure cleurly
more lmorLunL Lo u mu|orlLy of MSAs us comured
Lo Lhe frucLlon of clLles und counLles LhuL reorLs
Lhese lLems huvlng un lnuence on green bulldlng
ollcy a
Focus Groups
locus grous were conducLed ln 8olse lduho
wlLh Lwo key sLukeholder urLles clLy lunners
und ubllc works rofesslonul us well us bulldlng
develoers und owners 1he goul wus Lo exumlne
Lhe dlerences und commonullLles ln Lhe resonses
beLween Lhe focus grous wlLh Lhe ob|ecLlve of
evenLuully undersLundlng more ubouL Lhe lncenLlves
und burrlers Lo green bulldlng for boLh clLles und Lhe
develomenL communlLy
Focus Group Questions
locus grou urLlclunLs were usked Lo resond Lo
Lhe followlng quesLlons wlLhln Lhe conLexL of green
bulldlng rucLlces ln generul und Lhen for LLLL
cerLlcuLlon sLundurds seclcully
WhuL ure Lhe overull fucLors LhuL encouruge
green bulldlng
WhuL lncenLlves or lnformuLlon encouruge Lhe
udoLlon of green bulldlng
WhuL ure Lhe seclc burrlers Lo Lhe udoLlon of
green bulldlng rucLlces
WhuL Lools or suorL would encouruge you Lo
udoL green bulldlng rucLlces
Are Lhere uny oLher Lhlngs LhuL mlghL lmucL
Lhe udoLlon of green bulldlng rucLlces
Focus Group Methodology
An uduLuLlon of nomlnul grou Lechnlque ls used
us un ulLernuLlve Lo brulnsLormlng us our rocess
for collecLlng resonses Lo Lhe ubove oenended
quesLlons AL Lhe end of Lhe rocess Lhere ls u
rlorlLlzed llsL of soluLlons or recommenduLlons
Seclcully ufLer Lhe concluslon of euch focus
grou we LubuluLed Lhe resulLs of Lhe runklngs
uccordlng Lo Lhe followlng scheme
1he olnLs for euch fucLor were Lhen udded und
Lullled Lo come u wlLh Lhe nul runklng us shown ln
Lhe Lubles followlng
Focus Group Results
1o geL un lnlLlul lcLure of Lhe oLenLlul dlerences
und commonullLles of clLy rofesslonuls und
bulldlng develoers four focus grous were
conducLed Lhe rsL Lwo wlLh clLy lunners und
ubllc works ersonnel und Lhe second Lwo wlLh
develoers consLrucLlon lndusLry members und
urchlLecLs Luch Lye of sLukeholder hud Lwo
seuruLe focus grous Luch grou generuLed
Lhelr own ldeus und runklngs As u resulL Lhe ldeus
fucLors generuLed by Lhe seuruLe focus grous
for euch of Lhe quesLlons ofLen do noL muLch
exucLly Where Lhey dld muLch exucLly Lhe resulLs
were comblned Where Lhere wus uny slgnlcunL
dlerence le LducuLlon und Consumer
LducuLlon Lhey ure lefL seuruLe 1he followlng
Lubles show resonses Lo euch of Lhe quesLlons
llsLed rsL by hlghesL olnL vulue und second
where olnLs were equul ulhubeLlcully
City Projessiono/s Ouestion Whot ore the
overo// joctors thot encouroge green bui/ding
ClLy lunners und ubllc works rofesslonuls hud
u broud sreud of resonses on Lhls quesLlon us
lndlcuLed by Lhe muny lLems wlLh low score LoLuls
As u resulL Lhere were fewer fucLors LhuL sLood ouL
Research Methods and Findings
In conducting original research, focus groups and interviews were used to develop survey
questions that would provide empirical evidence to better sort out the barriers and
incentives that exist for green building and LEED initiatives.
To get an initial
picture of
the potential
diferences and
commonalities of
city professionals
and building
developers, four
focus groups
were conducted.
Table 2: Ranking Values for Focus Group Responses
References
8ude M leuslblllLy sLudy for u green bulldlng ollcy for Lhe UnlverslLy of Cullfornlu Preured by
Mlchuel 8ude Oce of Lhe PresldenL Leslgn ConsLrucLlon Servlces Muy
8lrL 8 Newshum C PosLoccuuncy evuluuLlon of energy und lndoor envlronmenL quullLy ln
green bulldlngs A revlew hLLwwwnrccnrcgccuob|lrcdocubsnrccdf
8ourlund L lncremenLul cosL meusuruble suvlngs LnLerrlse green communlLles crlLerlu
ReLrleved from hLLwwwgreenblzcomreseurchreorLlncremenLulcosL
meusurublesuvlngs
8ulldlng Leslgn und ConsLrucLlon WhlLe uer on susLulnublllLy Reed 8uslness lnformuLlon
November
Cole R Creen bulldlngs und gruy occuunLs Puer resenLed uL Lhe AlAUSC8C Conference on
MulnsLreumlng Creen ChuLLunoogu 1N OcLober
Llnsmore H RoberL 1r 1he unclenL musLer bullder un essuy MusLerbullder lellowshl for Lhe 8ullL
LnvlronmenL lnc hLLwwwmusLerbullderfellowshlcomugehLml
LormunL L lmlemenLlng Humun Performunce 1echnology ln orgunlzuLlons ln H SLolovlLch L
Kees Lds Hundbook of humun erformunce Lechnology nd ed Sun lrunclsco
CA 1ossey8ussPfeler
llsk W HeulLh und roducLlvlLy gulns from beLLer lndoor envlronmenLs und Lhelr lmllcuLlons for
Lhe US LeurLmenL of Lnergy Proceedlngs of Lhe Lvlslon Conference OcLober
WushlngLon LC
Creen8ulldlngcom Creen bulldlng Llmellne urchlved hLLweburchlveorg
webhLLwwwgreenbulldlngcomgreenHlsLoryhLml
Heerwugen 1 Creen bulldlngs orgunlzuLlonul success und occuunL roducLlvlLy 8ulldlng Reseurch
und lnformuLlon
lnLervlews lnLervlews conducLed by 1ony Murker und Susun Muson durlng All lnLervlewees
were ussured condenLlullLy und Lherefore ure noL noLed by nume
1eson 1r L 1 1he udoLlon of susLulnuble develomenL ollcles und Lechnlques ln US clLles how
wlde how dee und whuL role for lunners 1ournul of Plunnlng LducuLlon und Reseurch
A
luyerson mlghL suy LhuL u green
bulldlng uses envlronmenLullyfrlendly
muLerluls or sysLems or erhus LhuL
Lhe develoer lncororuLed rocesses
Lo reduce resource consumLlon
durlng consLrucLlon 1hough Lhese ure lmorLunL
churucLerlsLlcs erhus Lhe mosL owerful usecL
of u green deslgn ln Lhe bullL envlronmenL ls
LhuL rucLlLloners uly u hollsLlc und lnLegruLed
urouch Lo deslgn und consLrucLlon And Lhough
we muy huve veered from such urouches ln recenL
hlsLory Lhe conceL ucLuully duLes buck Lhousunds
of yeurs Lo Lhe orlgln of Lhe musLer bullder MosL
of clvlllzuLlons slgnlcunL works of urchlLecLure
from Lhe yrumlds of LgyL Lo Lhe clusslc cuLhedruls
of Luroe were deslgned und bullL by Lhe musLer
bullder Llnsmore 1hese bullderurchlLecLs
hud u furreuchlng vlew of Lhe enLlre bulldlng
from deslgn Lhrough consLrucLlon und llfeLlme
oeruLlons lncororuLlng funcLlonul usslve deslgns
for heuLlng coollng und llghLlng 1oduy Lhese
e clenL usslve deslgn feuLures whlch conslder
cllmuLlc seLLlng und solur orlenLuLlon ure mulnsLuys
of whuL ls consldered Lo be green bulldlng und
feuLure sLrongly ln Loduys green bulldlng ruLlng
schemes
Long before Lhe Lh cenLury however Lhe
musLer bullder hud ull buL dlsueured reluced
by deslgnerurLlsLs who recelved urchlLecLurul
commlsslons buL hud llLLle undersLundlng of Lhe
bulldlng urLs As Lhe seuruLlon of urchlLecLurul
deslgn und consLrucLlon becume more dlsLlncL
u new buslness enLerrlse emerged LhuL of Lhe
generul bulldlng conLrucLor Llnsmore
SLurLlng ln Lhe s Lhe uvullublllLy ln Lhe US
of cheu fossll fuels surred Lhe develomenL of
glussundsLeel sLrucLures LhuL could be heuLed
und cooled wlLh musslve heuLlng venLlluLlon und
ulr condlLlonlng sysLems Creen8ulldlngcom
New bulldlng Lechnologles lncludlng ulr
condlLlonlng lowwuLLuge uorescenL llghLlng
sLrucLurul sLeel und reecLlve gluss ullowed
urchlLecLs develoers und generul conLrucLors Lo
eschew Lhe LlmeLesLed meLhods of Lhe musLer
bullders ln fuvor of Lhese energy lnLenslve
Lechnologles
The Emergence of Green
Building and Rating Systems
Almost every day, in every major news outlet, there is some mention of the achievements
of a new green building. But there are still many people who are unsure of what really
makes a building green. This section talks about the defning characteristics of green
building design and construction, the origins of green design, and a brief history of how
we have arrived at todays standards and the LEED rating system.
3,000 B.C. 1,200 A.D.
1930 A.D. 1970 A.D.
Green Building and Rating Systems 3,000 B.C. to 2009 A.D.
Pyramids to Cathedrals -- Master builders
of antiquity were responsible for design
and lifetime construction.
Forward-thinking
architects,
environmentalists,
ecolgists begin
questioning
advisability of
energy intensive
building practices. Oil prices spike, calling
attention to nations use of fossel fuels.
Glass-and-steel structures
that could be heated
and cooled with massive
heating, ventilation, and air
conditioning systems
9. Has your city established policies or gui deli nes governi ng green buil ding? (PLEASE CHECK ONE)
No
Yes, informal/ unwritten (e.g., gi ven more leeway or considerati on)
Yes, formal/written (e.g., adopted as part of a comprehensi ve pl an or functional plan)
Dont Know/ Not sure
10. How important are the foll owi ng factors in terms of actually influencing policy on green buildi ng in your
city? Using the scale to the right, please indicate how much influence, if at all, the following factors
have on green buil ding policy in the city. (PLEASE CIRCLE THE BEST RESPONSE)
11. Is there a lead office or personnel speci fically responsible for green buildi ng proj ects or activities in the city? (PLEASE
CHECK ONE)
Yes
No
Dont Know/ Not sure
12. How many public works personnel or pl anners work speci fically for the city? (CIRCLE A NUMBER or 00
if you Dont Know) Dont Know
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+ 00
13. How many support staff are there for the public works personnel or planners that work for the city?
(CIRCLE A NUMBER or 00 if you Dont Know) Dont Know
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+ 00
14. How many of the staff are accredited as a LEED AP? (CIRCLE A NUMBER or 00 if you Dont Know)
Dont Know
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+ 00
15. What are the most important barriers to the use of green buildi ng practices in the city? (PLEASE CHECK THE TOP
FIVE)
Confusion among green building programs Misrepresentation green washing
Availability of certified resources for green buildi ng Lack of regulat ory flexibility
Cost to retrofit existing buildi ngs Bad economy
Resistance by industry and trade uni ons Lack of consumer education
Process uncertainty Need for new suppliers
Building code issues and interpretation of codes Learning curve costs
Percei ved costs Compl exity of certification
Cost (real ) up front vs. Return on investment Lack of demand for green buil dings
Neighboring city did not adopt green buil ding policies Other___________________________
-Please turn the page over and continue the survey-
No Very Strong Dont
Influence Influence Know
a. Federal guidance on green buildi ng 1 2 3 4 5 0
b. State guidance on green building 1 2 3 4 5 0
c. International Code Council (ICC) or other code drafting body 1 2 3 4 5 0
d. Other neighboring cities engaging in green buildi ng 1 2 3 4 5 0
e. Other neighboring cities not engaging in green buildi ng 1 2 3 4 5 0
f. The championi ng of green buil ding by local business leaders 1 2 3 4 5 0
g. The support for green building by elected officials 1 2 3 4 5 0
h. Risk associated with getting the new code standard wrong 1 2 3 4 5 0
i. Risk that the current technol ogy is incorrect 1 2 3 4 5 0
j. Devel oper pushback (threat that they will take development
elsewhere to avoid new standards)
1
2
3
4
5
0
k. Political pushback from developers (encouraging l eaders not
to adopt new standards)
1
2
3
4
5
0
l. The implications of green buildi ng on global warmi ng 1 2 3 4 5 0
m. The Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) Mayors agreement 1 2 3 4 5 0
Appendix A
16. What are the most important incenti ves that encourage the adoption of green building in the city? (PLEASE CHECK
THE TOP FIVE)
Expedited revi ews (of green projects) High profile champions locally
Healthi er buildings Marketability of green buildings
Reduced impact fees Public outreach/education
Bank promoting green loans and/ or appraisals Social Responsibility
Recognition for builders and devel opers Lower life-cycle costs
Citizens interest Increased longevity of buildi ngs
Codes that encourage green buil ding Political vision
Higher density/bonus and offsets for green building Regul ations that provide predictability
(risk mitigation) Trained staff with green building expertise
Education resources Financial payback
(Education materials and traini ng) Reduce Carbon
Neighboring city did not adopt green buil ding policies Other___________________________
LEED Certification
17. What are the most important barriers to LEED certifi ed buildi ng in the city? (PLEASE CHECK THE TOP FIVE)
Confusion among green building programs Misrepresentation green washing
Availability of certified resources for green buildi ng Lack of regulat ory flexibility
Paperwork load Bad economy
Resistance by industry and trade uni ons Lack of consumer education
Process uncertainty Need for new suppliers
Building code issues and interpretation of codes Learning curve costs
Percei ved costs Compl exity of certification
Cost (real ) up front vs. Return on investment Lack of demand for green buil dings
Other___________________________
18. What are the most important incenti ves that encourage the adoption of LEED certificati on in the city? (PLEASE
CHECK THE TOP FIVE)
Expedited revi ews (of green projects) High profile champions locally
Healthi er buildings Marketability of LEED buil dings
Reduced fees in general Public outreach/education
Bank promoting green loans and/ or appraisals Social Responsibility
Recognition for builders and devel opers Lower life-cycle costs
Citizens Interest Increased longevity of buildi ngs
Codes that encourage green buil ding Political vision
Higher density/bonus and offsets for green building Regul ations that provide predictability
(risk mitigation) LEED certification as a brand adds value
Education resources Trained staff with green building expertise
(Education materi als and training) Reduce Carbon
Financial payback Other___________________________
19. Are there any topics not treated in this questionnaire that you feel are important for understandi ng more about what
makes green building practices more accepted by and accessible to cities, developers, planners and other stakehol ders ?
If so, please provide the information below or use additional sheets, if necessary.
1.5
Figure 1
What does
a ton of CO2
look like?
Containing a
metric ton of
invisible CO2
(2,204 pounds)
would require a
cube container
measuring 27
feet by 27 feet
by 27 feet, a
total of 19,683
cubic feet.
Right: Ninth
grade physics
students built
this model to
scale.
3ource: rllp://WWW.erer-
gyrace.cor/correrlary/
Wral_does_a_lor_ol_co2_
|oo|_|||e/
W
e conLlnue Lo Luke sLes Lo ussess
und reduce our envlronmenLul
lmucL SecreLury of veLeruns
Aulrs Lrlc K Shlnsekl suld
Lnsurlng Lhe susLulnublllLy of our
fuclllLles ucross Lhe counLry hels us uccomllsh our
rlmury mlsslon servlng veLeruns PRNewswlre
USNewswlre
How does meeLlng green bulldlng sLundurds
ensure susLulnublllLy Or more lulnly why
should we cure ubouL bulldlng emlsslons Curbon
dloxlde ls by fur Lhe mosL rollc comonenL of ull
greenhouse gus emlsslons seclcully uccounLlng
for mllllon of Lhe mllllon of meLrlc Lons
of curbon dloxlde equlvulenL M1CLL generuLed
ln Lhe US ln more Lhun ercenL of
Lhe green house gus emlsslons US Lnergy
lnformuLlon AdmlnlsLruLlon LlA And
resldenLlul und commerclul bulldlngs comblne Lo
uccounL for ercenL of ull energy consumLlon
und energyreluLed greenhouse gus emlsslons
unnuully muklng Lhem un obvlous focus of
greenhouse gus emlsslon reducLlon eorLs
1runsorLuLlon und lndusLry ure Lhe oLher mu|or
secLors of energy use buL nelLher conLrlbuLes us
much us bulldlngs Lo greenhouse gus emlsslons
LlA
Whlle Lhere ls no uveruge bulldlng Lo ullow for
comurlsons one wuy Lo Lhlnk ubouL Lhe lssue ls
by uslng LnvlronmenLul ProLecLlon Agency LPA
esLlmuLes whlch suy LhuL burnlng one gullon of
gusollne generuLes ubouL ounds of CO 8y
1
Erergy use accourled lor 5,91Z VTC0E ol lre ,021 VTC0E gerer-
aled |r 200Z (ElA, 2009)
C
reen bulldlng rucLlces use
envlronmenLully frlendly muLerluls
or sysLems ulled ln u hollsLlc und
lnLegruLed urouch Lo deslgn und
consLrucLlon Leudershl ln Lnergy
und LnvlronmenLul Leslgn LLLL ls one ruLlng
sysLem und one of only Lwo Creen Clobes belng
Lhe oLher LhuL huve been develoed by ugencles
uccredlLed by Lhe Amerlcun NuLlonul SLundurds
lnsLlLuLe PRNewswlreUSNewswlre 1he lurge
body of reseurch LhuL exlsLs on LLLLcerLled
bulldlngs mukes LLLL u useful frume of reference Lo
undersLund more ubouL green bulldlng ln generul us
well us LLLLcerLled bulldlngs seclcully
Reseurch reveuls LhuL on some green or LLLL
cerLled develomenL ro|ecLs Lhe ufronL cosLs
muy be hlgher buL noL neurly us hlgh
us unecdoLul evldence suggesLs 8elng
selecLlve ubouL Lhe susLulnuble deslgn crlLerlu und
feuLures used ln u bulldlng cun kee consLrucLlon
wlLhln budgeL und roduce greuLer longLerm
energy conservuLlon lncororuLlng green bulldlng
Lechnlques from Lhe lnceLlon of u ro|ecL und ln u
hollsLlc munner cun reduce cosLs us well us furLher
ussure beneLs wlll be used und reullzed by owner
und LenunLs ullke lumlllurlLy wlLh green bulldlng
sLundurds rovldes greuLer undersLundlng of cosLs
und beneLs lessenlng reslsLunce Lo green bulldlng
LducuLlon for bullders owners und LenunLs wlll go u
long wuy Lo encouruge green bulldlng
LuLu druwn from focus grous conducLed ln
8olse lduho und surveys wlLh clLles ln Lhe Puclc
NorLhwesL lduho Oregon ULuh und WushlngLon
reveul heulLhler bulldlngs und soclul resonslblllLy
ure currenLly Lhe blggesL lncenLlves for encouruglng
develoers Lo enguge ln green bulldlng rucLlces
whlle cosLs und uncerLulnLy ubouL reLurn on
lnvesLmenL ure Lhe blggesL burrlers ClLles wunLlng
Lo uddress Lhe blggesL burrlers see nunclul
lncenLlves us Lhe key Lo romoLlng green bulldlng
ln Lhe shorL Lerm Over Lhe long huul clLles see
educuLlon ubouL Lhe beneLs und rucLlces of green
bulldlng us essenLlul Lo ensurlng Lhe deslred reLurn
on Lhe lnvesLmenL und meeLlng communlLy gouls
u ersecLlve shured by develoers
1hls uer recommends severul besL rucLlces
ldenLled from u revlew of reseurch und lnLervlews
conducLed for Lhls reorL us well us from Lhe new
emlrlcul evldence guLhered here 1he sLruLegles
LhuL follow muy be urorluLe for communlLles
ln Lhe Puclc NorLhwesL lnLeresLed ln romoLlng
und suorLlng green bulldlng rucLlces 1he
recommenduLlons full lnLo four broud cuLegorles
LhuL lnvolve rovldlng
MurkeLlng Lo lncreuse ubllc demund for green
bulldlng
Pollcles und rocesses Lo suorL nunclul
uybuck for develoers
lnformuLlon demonsLruLlons und Lrulnlng Lo
encouruge Lhe udoLlon of green bulldlng
SuorL for currenL users of green bulldlng und
LLLL cerLlcuLlon Lo conLlnue Lhelr use und
udvocucy of green bulldlng
AlLhough Lhe bulk of Lhe leudershl for Lhe
recommenduLlons fulls on Lhe clLles success
ln meeLlng green bulldlng gouls wlll be besL
uccomllshed Lhrough ubllc und rlvuLe
urLnershls LhuL enuble boLh clLles und develoers
Lo lnlLluLe und udvunce green bulldlng rucLlces a
This report provides data from conversations, focus groups, and surveys with both
members of the construction industry and local governments about their perspectives
on the barriers and incentives for green building in their communities, primarily, in the
Pacifc Northwest. Nearly 500 construction industry members and just over 300 local
governments participated in the research, providing one of the largest and perhaps
the frst studies of the aggregated voices for both the public and private sector on
factors that afect green building.
Executive Summary
This report
consolidates
information
to provide
a deeper
understanding
of green
building
issues and
opportunities
facing Pacifc-
Northwest
communities.
Executive Summary
7. f requently hear my colleagues and peers talking about green building practices.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
8. understand green building practices are.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
9. am 127 considering enrolling in a certif ication course f or a set of green building practices.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
10. enjoy working with green building practices.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
11. regularly discuss green building practices with my colleagues and peers.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
12. think green building practices have signif icant f inancial and environmental benef its f or our current society and f uture generations.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
13. would personally like to see the practice of green building practices expanded.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
14. f eel that have all the knowledge, resources, and support need to implement green building practices in the f uture.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
15. '2127 intend to f ind more inf ormation about green building practices.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
16. intend to try applying green building practices on a project.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
17. have earned certif ication in a set of green building practices and intend to seek out additional inf ormation to aid in my use of them.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
18. am currently using green building practices on a regular basis.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
19. '2127 plan to continue to use green building practices in the f uture.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
20. am seeing obvious benef its to my use of green building practices both in terms of building perf ormance and in terms of financial results.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
22. actively encourage my colleagues and peers to adopt green building practices.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
23. At which of the f ollowing stages of adoption would you expect to f ind most construction prof essionals with regard to green building
practices in general?
Unaware: Not yet aware of green building practices
Curious: Aware but dont yet have much information about green building
practices
Envisioning: knowledgeable but want to see them in action bef ore they try them
Tryout: Ready to actively get training on green building so they can use it on the
job
Using it: Already using it and want or need support to maintain its use
I dont know.
pref er not to say.
24. At which of the f ollowing stages of adoption would you expect to f ind most city planners with regard to using LEED certification
standards specif ically?
Unaware: Not yet aware of LEED building practices
Curious: Aware but dont yet have much information about LEEDb uilding practices
Envisioning: knowledgeable but want to see them in action bef ore they try them
Tryout: Ready to actively get training on LEED building so they can use it on the job
Using it: Already using it and want or need support to maintain its use
I dont know.
pref er not to say.
25. enjoy experimenting with new technology even when do not need to.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
26. am NOT very concerned about the well-being of f uture generations.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
dont know pref er not to say
27. am conf ident that science and technology actively benef it humanity.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
28. enjoy working through complex problems with no clear or immediate solution.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
29. aggressively seek more inf ormation about green building practices.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
30. can clearly imagine complex goals and the path to reach them.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I dont know pref er not to say
31. My prof essional colleagues DO NOT regularly seek my opinion about new developments in our f ield.
strongly
disagree
disagree
somewhat
disagree
neither agree or
disagree
somewhat
agree
agree
strongly
agree
I don t know pref er not to say
32. There is still a great deal more have yet to accomplish in my prof essional lif e.
strongly somewhat neither agree or somewhat strongly
Appendix B
disagree disagree disagree disagree agree agree agree
I dont know I pref er not to say
Contents
LxecuLlve Summury
SLuLemenL of Lhe Problem
1he Lmergence of Creen 8ulldlng und RuLlng
SysLems
WhuL ls Reully Known AbouL Lhe Pros und
Cons of Creen 8ulldlng Reseurch Lvldence
Reseurch MeLhods und llndlngs
locus Crous
Survey Purose Audlence und MeLhod
Locul CovernmenL Survey llndlngs und
Anulysls
ConsLrucLlon lndusLry Survey llndlngs und
Anulysls
NexL SLes
References
Aendlces
Aendlx ACreen 8ulldlng Survey
Aendlx 8ConsLrucLlon lndusLry Member
Survey
LlsL of 1ubles und llgures lnslde 8uck Cover
Next Steps for
an Emerging
Trend
Green
Building
in the Pacifc Northwest:
33. I have a large social and prof essional network that includes people outside my local area.
I strongly
disagree
I
disagree
I somewhat
disagree
I neither agree or
disagree
I somewhat
agree
I
agree
I strongly
agree
I dont know I pref er not to say
Section B: Demographics
The f ollowing demographic questions will help us better understand who has responded to our survey. We will combine your answers with those of
everyone else to give us a big picture view of the professionals involved in the construction industry regarding green building practices. We will not
identif y individuals. If there are any questions you do not wish to answer you may leave them blank; however, it will aid in our analysis if you would mark,
I pref er not to say, on the survey.
34. What is the highest degree either of your parents have earned:
High School
Associates Degree
Bachelors Degree
Technical Certif icate
Masters Degree
Doctoral Degree
Post-Graduate Certif ications
I dont know.
I pref er not to say.
35. I participate in prof essional and social organization f unctions:
Never 1-2 times per year 3-4 times per year 5-6 times per year 1-2 per month 3-4 times per month 5-6 times per month
I dont know I pref er not to say
36. I travel f or prof essional purposes (e.g., business trips and conf erences):
Never 1-2 times per year 3-4 times per year 5-6 times per year 1-2 per month 3-4 times per month 5-6 times per month
I dont know I pref er not to say
37. I have contact with outreach representatives of organizations promoting green building practices:
Never 1-2 times per year 3-4 times per year 5-6 times per year 1-2 per month 3-4 times per month 5-6 times per month
I dont know I pref er not to say
38. Highest Level of Education you have completed:
High School
Associates Degree
Bachelors Degree
Technical Certif icate
Post-Graduate Certif ications
Masters Degree
Doctoral Degree
I dont know.
I pref er not to say.
39. Mark the main media sources you use f or inf ormation more than once a week, this would include both hardcopy and electronic sources:
Newspaper
Prof essional Blogs
Newsletters
Television
Podcasts
Internet video and radio
Books
Magazines
Trade Journals
Academic Journals
Webinars
Other ______________________
I dont know.
I pref er not to say.
40. Mark the methods of communication you use multiple times during the week:
Email
Telephone
Cell Phone
Text Messaging
Social Networking Sites
Online Discussion Boards
Face-to-Face meetings
Teleconf erencing
Video Conf erencing
Other ______________________
I dont know.
I pref er not to say.
42. Please estimate your annual income:
Less than $20,000
More than $20,000 but less than $30,000
More than $30,000 but less than $40,000
More than $40,000 but less than $50,000
More than $50,000 but less than $75,000
More than $75,000 but less than $100,000
$100,000 or more
I dont know.
I pref er not to say.
Boise State University
Principal Investigators:
SUSAN MASON, PhD, Director
Community and Regional Planning
Graduate Programs; Assistant Professor,
Public Policy and Administration;
Assistant Professor, Political Science
ANTHONY MARKER, PhD, LEED AP,
Assistant Professor, Instructional &
Performance Technology
REBECCA MIRSKY PhD, PE, LEED
AP, Associate Professor, Construction
Management
Students and Sta
KRISTOF BIHARI
SARAH CUELLAR
CATHERINE DICKINSON
ALICIA DILLON
MIKE JOURNEE
CHRIS LATTER
TWYLA PERKINS
ZULFIRA PULATOVA
MICHAEL ROGERS
JACQUELINE SPRATT
KEVIN TAYLOR
Research Sponsors
AVISTA
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITYS OFFICE OF
SUSTAINABILITY
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITYS PUBLIC
POLICY CENTER
CAPITAL CITY DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
CITY OF BOISE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
CITY OF BOISE PUBLIC WORKS
ENERGY POLICY INSTITUTE
IDAHO POWER
URBAN LAND INSTITUTE-IDAHO
DISTRICT COUNCIL
T
his report provides an understanding of why green building is important to
our communities, a brief look at the emergence of green building standards,
research evidence on the perceived pros and cons of green building, and original
research on green building in the Pacic Northwest. The original research is
an analysis of perspectives voiced in conversations, focus groups and surveys
with both members of the construction industry and local government on the
barriers and incentives to green building in their local communities. As nearly 500
construction industry members and just over 300 local governments participated
in the research, this report encompasses, perhaps for
the rst time, one of the largest examinations of the
aggregated voices of both the public and private sector
on factors that aect green building. Green house gas
emissions from commercial buildings are growing at a
faster than average annual rate 1.8% higher than either
transportation or residential emission rates. This trend
alone provides strong justication to take a close look at
the factors that may help change this dynamic.
Faculty and graduate students in the College
of Social Sciences and Public Aairs and
the College of Engineering assembled this
report. It consolidates information to provide a
deeper understanding of green building issues
and opportunities facing Pacic-Northwest
communities. The report provides both municipalities and construction
professionals information that may foster their green building goals.
Members of both groups indicate they want to engage in green building,
but in a nancially viable way. This report is a starting point for formally
identifying the next steps for making green building more likely.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the generosity of the sponsors
who made this research possible.
Paper used for the production of this report is FSC Certied.
OFFICE OF
SUSTAINABILITY
AND THE PUBLIC
POLICY CENTER
2
6 Figure 1: Mr. Ames, 9th grade physics student built a
27 x 27 X 27 cube
17 Table 1: Summary of Main Points from Reviewed
Research
18 Table 2: Ranking Values for Focus Group Responses
19 Table 3: City Planners and Public Works Professionals
Ranking of Factors that Encourage Green Building
19 Table 4: City Planners and Public Works Professionals
Ranking of Incentives that Encourage Green Building
20 Table 5: City Planners and Public Works Professionals
Ranking of Barriers to Green Building
20 Table 6: City Planners and Public Works Professionals
Ranking of Tools that Encourage Green Building
21 Table 7: Members of the Development Communitys
Ranking of Factors that Encourage Green Building
21 Table 8: Members of the Development Communitys
Ranking of Incentives that Encourage Green Building
22 Table 9: Members of the Development Communitys
Ranking Barriers to Green Building
22 Table 10: Members of the Development Communitys
Ranking of Tools that Encourage Green Building
23 Table 11: Comparison of the Top Five Factors for
Developers and Cities
25 Table 12: City and County Survey Response Rate by
State
26 Table 13: Construction Professional Survey Response
Rate by State
26 Table 14: Mayor/County Commissioner Support for
Green Building Practices
27 Table 15: Cities Perceptions of the Awareness of
Green Building by Developers
27 Table 16: Community Factors that Support Green
Building
29 Table 17: Use of Economic Tools to Promote Green
Building
29 Table 18: Policy and Guidelines for Green Building
30 Table 19: Factors and their degree of inuence on
green building policy
31 Table 20: Sta and LEED AP Accredited Sta by City,
County and MSA
32 Figure 2: Top Five Barriers for Green Building
32 Figure 3: Top Five Incentives for Green Building
33 Figure 4: Top Five Barriers for LEED
33 Figure 5: Top Five Incentives for LEED
35 Figure 6: Top Five Barriers
35 Figure 7: Top Five Incentives
37 Table 21: Summary of Construction Industry Survey
Data
38 Table 22: Adoption Level and Strategy
39 Table 23: Construction Industry Members and Stage
of Adoption
List of Tables and Figures
Figures and Tables
55
Next Steps for
an Emerging
Trend
Green
Building
in the Pacic Northwest:
OFFICE OF
SUSTAINABILITY
AND THE PUBLIC
POLICY CENTER
OFFICE OF
SUSTAINABILITY
AND THE PUBLIC
POLICY CENTER
Published
February, 2010
This report provides important and timely feedback on the perceptions of
developers, design professionals, the construction industry and members
of government within our local cities and counties. The impact of the built
environment is signicant, and this report outlines critical factors necessary
for market transformation: namely education, incentives and a holistic and
integrated approach to design and construction. We have the opportunity
to use this information to overcome barriers and establish common ground
to create more sustainable buildings with lower lifecycle costs and healthier
indoor environments that benet rather than burden our society.
Sharon Patterson
Chair of the Board, USGBC Idaho Chapter, LEED AP BD+C and Homes
The report is a thorough overview of many issues confronting the green
building market as it continues to grow and mature. It clearly illustrates
how the simple concept of sustainability has layers of complexity when the
various stakeholders look at it from their own perspective. The snapshot
it presents provides guidance to anyone who is attempting to apply
sustainable concepts to the built environment.
Bruce Poe, AIA, LEED AP
Modus Architecture