Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
n
i=1
R
i
f ( ) for n >> 1 (R)
The specular absorption coecient a is calculated by the equation:
a f ( ) = 1 [R
spe
f ( )[
2
(S)
Provided the energy losses can be neglected, the result of Eq. (5) is directly iden-
tical with the scattering coecient o. Otherwise the absorption coecient must be
determined separately. In rst-order approximation this is achieved by quadratic
summation of the individual (angle-dependent) results:
o f ( ) - 1
1
n
n
i=1
[R
i
f ( )[
2
. (T)
It should be noted that in some cases it is necessary to perform additional measure-
ments with the microphone placed at a larger distance from the test object to avoid
near eld eects. This involved a check if the far-eld impulse response contained no
components signicantly dierent from those in the near-eld situation.
In principle the method of averaging is possible for all angles in the complete
hemisphere above the sample. But it is also possible to average just over the azimuth
angles. In this case, since the samples are rotated between two measurements by c,
as indicated in Fig. 4, the scattering coecient o 0 averaged over the horizontal
angles c for one azimuth angle 0 is obtained. By applying Paris' formula [5] to the
absorption coecients collected for dierent azimuth angles 0 it is possible to obtain
the random-incidence scattering coecient o
s
.
Fig. 5 shows the results obtained for the two test structures in a scale model. To
illustrate the size of the eects, it should be noted that the wavelength at 10 kHz is
approximately equal to the average structure period d. Accordingly dl equals 1
at 10 kHz. The measurements were performed at 0 30
. 45
. 60
. 75
and c
0
90
with c 10
= 55.3
V
cS
1
T
2
1
T
1
(U)
one obtains the random-incidence absorption coecient o
is cal-
culated according to Eq. (2).
4.2. Discussion of exemplary results
Examples of results obtained in the scale model reverberation chamber in com-
parison with the free-eld method are shown in Fig. 9. At low and mid frequencies
the agreement between results from the free-eld method and the reverberation
room method is very good indeed. At high frequencies some deviations are
observed.
The deviations at high frequencies can be explained by the fact that the sample
area was not circular but quadratic. This inuence is larger with the reverberation
room method, since the distance of the microphones to the sample was larger.
However, the eect of the base surface size and shape must be studied more inten-
sively in future.
In further tests with other exemplary samples the circular arrangement was used.
Fig. 10 shows results of wooden hemispheres distributed randomly on a wooden
Fig. 8. Impulse responses measured in the reverberation room (10 kHz, 1/3 octave band).
194 M. Vorlander, E. Mommertz / Applied Acoustics 60 (2000) 187199
plate at various densities. Fig. 11 shows scattering coecients as well as the
absorption coecient of a scale modelled Schroeder diuser (circular sample). This
kind of material is particularly used in studio constructions for scattering purposes.
(The sample was granted by RPG Diusors Inc. for the measurement series.)
4.3. Required number of averages
In the following it is discussed, how the number of averages aects the resulting
``integrated impulse responses''. For this purpose impulse responses were recorded
at subsequent angular steps of 10
n
i=1
h
i
t ( )
2
= nr
spe
t ( )
n
i=1
s
i
t ( )
2
(eI)
Here, r
spe
t corresponds to the coherent component in each measurement. Pro-
vided the scattered components of the sample s
i
t are statistically independent, one
yields with Eq. (A1):
n
i=1
h
i
t ( )
2
- nr
spe
t ( )
n
i=1
s
i
t ( )
2
= n
2
r
spe
t ( )
2
n - s t ( )
2
> (eP)
with
M. Vorlander, E. Mommertz / Applied Acoustics 60 (2000) 187199 197
- s t ( )
2
>=
1
n
n
i=1
s
i
t ( )
2
-
1
n
n
i=1
s
i
t ( )
2
. (eQ)
If jr
spe
t j
2
is modelled by an exponential decay, as usually done in statistical
reverberation theory, the coherent component is
E
spe
t ( ) = E
0
e
13.8tT
2
(eR)
while the scattered energy E
st
t is identical with the dierence between the totally
and the coherently reected energy:
E
st
t ( ) = E
totl
t ( ) E
spe
t ( ) = E
0
e
13.8tT
1
E
0
e
13.8tT
2
. (eS)
Using Eqs. (A2), (A4) and (A5) we obtain the average energytime curve after
addition of n room impulse responses:
n
i=1
h
i
t ( )
2
=
nE
0
n 1 ( )e
13.8tT
2
e
13.8tT
1
. (eT)
It is indeed the superposition of two decay curves with dierent initial levels and
decay constants. Of course it must be taken into account that an increase of the
number of averages is corresponding to smaller angular steps. These, however, must
be suciently large in comparison of the wavelengths with the travelled distance of
surface elements, to ensure decorrelation of the scattered components from mea-
surement to measurement.
References
[1] Meyer E, Bohn L. Schallreexion an Fla chen mit periodischer Struktur. Akustische Beihefte zur
Acustica 1952;3:AB195207.
[2] D'Antonio PJ, Konnert JH, Kovitz PS. Experimental measurements of directional scattering prop-
erties of architectural acoustic surfaces. Proceedings W.C. Sabine Centennial Symposium, Cam-
bridge, MA 1994. p. 1414.
[3] Schroeder MR. Phase gratings with suppressed specular reection. Acustica 1995;81:35469.
[4] Kleiner M, Gustafsson H, Backman J. Measurement of directional scattering coecients using near-
eld acoustic holography and spatial transformation of sound elds. J Audio Eng Soc 1997;45:331
46.
[5] Kuttru H. Room acoustics. 3rd ed. London: Elsever Applied Science, 1991.
[6] Mommertz E. Determination of scattering coecients from the reection directivity of architectural
surfaces. Applied Acoustics 2000;60(2):2013.
[7] Mommertz E, Vorla nder M. Measurement of scattering coecients of surfaces in the reverberation
chamber and in the free eld. Proceedings 15th International Congress on Acoustics, Trondheim,
1995. p. 57790.
[8] Vorla nder M. Messung der Schallstreuung an rauhen Fla chen. Fortschritte der Akustik, DAGA88,
Braunschweig. p. 7614.
198 M. Vorlander, E. Mommertz / Applied Acoustics 60 (2000) 187199
[9] Vorla nder M, Schaufelberger T. Messung des Diusita tsgrades rauher Fla chen. Fortschritte der
Akustik DAGA'90, DPG-GmbH, Bad Honnef, 1990. p. 82730.
[10] Mommertz E. Angle dependent in-situ measurements of reection coecients using a subtraction
technique. Applied Acoustics 1995;46:25163.
[11] Vorla nder M, Bietz H. Der Einu von Zeitvarianzen bei Maximalfolgenmessungen. Fortschritte der
Akustik DAGA'95, DPG-GmbH, Bad Honnef, 1995.
M. Vorlander, E. Mommertz / Applied Acoustics 60 (2000) 187199 199