1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

For your information, this is a copy of an email I just sent to all to point people in the Nation States Project. You are invited to attend the very important national conference call listed below. I welcome your comments or questions. respectively, g Subject: Nation States Project FLAWED To: Date: Tuesday, June 26, 2012, 12:42 PM

Brothers and Sisters: I understand that you are the contact person for the Nation State project, and as such, you are obligated to share this with your People. I appeal to you and the People in your State to consider this information objectively with an open mind, because it is extremely important and decisions need to be made on facts, not hearsay.

First, a brief summary of events as they happened. 1. Midsummer 2011, a group of People in Pennsylvania, led by Jim Wright, took action to lawfully reclaim and assert their status as sovereigns on the land. Because this would ultimately affect the entire world, proper Notice needed to be given to everyone affected, so they sent the Notice to the Hague Conference on Private International Law in the Netherlands. 2. The Notice came to the attention of a lady that is said to be the Trustee of a huge trust, the assets of which had been hijacked by someone. She planned to have our military help her regain control of the trust, and reasoned, or was told, that if a majority of the states would duplicate the Pennsylvania process, and join in a union, it would increase the chances of being able to utilize the military in her quest. 3. She then made contact with Terri H., who then contacted the record keeper for Pennsylvania, Delanne W., and from there the Nation State project was born. 4. Either by misunderstanding, misinterpretation, or disinformation, the participating People in the Nation States project were led to believe that the military had requested this action, when in fact, it was not the military - it was this Trustee. 5. It was determined by those core facilitators that instead of each State mailing their own individual Notice to the Hague as Pennsylvania did, everyone should mail their original documents to Delanne in Pennsylvania, whereupon they would be assembled into one package and sent to the Hague location. Everyone was requested to not send their Notice directly to The Hague.

- 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

6. The documents were collected and assembled in Pennsylvania, then sent by Courier to Rhode Island for an apostille, then back to Pennsylvania, then to Florida, and finally to the Hague in February, 2012.

There was a fatal flaw in this process. Our documents changed hands several times with no chain of custody documentations. All we have now is a receipt that some package arrived at The Hague. There is no evidential proof of what that package contained because proper protocols were not followed in the handling of those documents.

In order to lawfully prove what was sent to the Hague, witnesses must testify by verified affidavit that they personally observed and listed each and every document from each and every state being placed into the notice package, including the page count, attesting that they observed them being placed together into the shipping container, properly sealed, and handed over to a bonded courier service, noting the tracking number and writing all observances on a verified affidavit - to establish a chain of custody that is irrefutable. This is critical. For example, please note this excerpt from a report regarding the voter punch card incident in Florida in the year 2000. In the celebrated voter punch cards incident in Florida in the Al Gore dispute with George Bush in the last election, Gores attorneys introduced a batch of voter punch cards as evidence for the purpose of proving that the election was flawed. The judge never even looked at the evidence and threw Gores attorneys out of court. Although the press and public were not aware of the rationale for the action, the judges basis for doing what he did was that the cards were never presented to the court by a competent witness. There had to be a witness to state that the cards came from such and such a precinct and that the one testifying witnessed the cards being gathered up, boxed, and transported and was stating such matters under oath. Without such competent witness, there was nothing on which the judge could rely to substantiate any claim that there had been tampering with the cards during the gathering and transporting thereof. The same principle applies in any legal or lawful action. Take the mortgage foreclosure issue for instance. An ever increasing number of foreclosures are being thrown out of court because the plaintiff cannot prove ownership of the note and mortgage due to the lack of chain of custody documentation when the mortgages were sold and transferred several times.

- 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Also note this excerpt from the Jurisdictionary publication: Everyone with even a tiny smattering of exposure to the world of law and its courts knows that proof is the test by which lawsuits are determined proof of facts based on admissible evidence. Proof, however, is based solely on evidence presented and admitted (into court). One cannot prove a case by clever argument alone. No one can prove a case by convincing a jury hes a nice guy who deserves to win! The test of every case is proof that rests on evidence presented to the court in a manner the rules allow to be admitted. You can see how important it is that we have documented evidence that our Notice was lawfully completed. As it stands, all we have is someones word that someone gave them their word that everything has been taken care of and would be OK. Please consider the following facts:

1. Only one or two people in the Nation State project know who this trustee is. Nobody else even knows her name, or how to contact her. 2. As a Trustee, her primary responsibility and fiduciary duty - by any trust law - is to the trust, not to the Nation State project. Her interest in the Nation State project is to facilitate the achievement of her own agenda, which is regaining control of the trusts huge sum of money from the cabal. That does not make her bad, but we should be in control of our own fate, not a single individual whom we do not know. 3. Since large sums of money are involved, she could very likely have a large target on her back. In fact, attempts have reportedly been made on her life. That alone raises questions about the effectiveness of her military contacts who supposedly promised to protect us too. 4. Since she is human, she is vulnerable. Anything could happen to her, whether natural or induced. 5. If something bad does happen to her, where does that leave us? From the beginning we were told that the military asked us to reproduce Pennsylvanias process. That is not true -it was this trustee - in her effort to regain control of the trust.

Now consider this:

- 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

One trusted individual who has been involved in this project from the beginning is in touch with an active military person who works inside the pentagon. When this military person heard about our project he was actually excited, and wanted to do anything he could to facilitate our goals. This person has direct contact with trusted white hats in various departments inside the pentagon who are very worried about the fate of this Nation. If any action was underway or even planned on behalf of the Nation State project, one of the people he deals with on a daily basis would necessarily have to know something about it. Please keep in mind that this military individual has all the clearances needed to find out if something was on the drawing board. He knows who the good guys are and who the bad guys are (the good guys are in the majority by far). He searched diligently for any clues and found nothing.

Knowing that the Nation State project provided the lawful authority for the military to follow, and that our project was in harmony with the missions of the white hats, he offered to help us invoke their help and deliver a copy of the documentation to the appropriate people inside the Pentagon. He also stated that once they get said evidence of Lawful Notice, he would provide a direct military contact for each Nation State contact person.

Problem is: We dont have the evidence to give them. All we have is a receipt that some package was received at The Hague. There is no evidential proof of thecontents of that package. That is not good enough, given the nature and scope of this historical event. Our military cannot act on its own authority If We the People dont provide a lawful civil authority, they will have to continue to take their orders from the corporate CEO Obama.

However, the core facilitators, who have a copy of our document package, refuse to make it available so that the process can be done again as a second notice in a manner acceptable to the military.

We are told that the Nation States project has been completed not true, at least not correctly.

We are told to stand down and do nothing, yet we know there were fatal flaws in the

- 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

procedures.

We were also told other things that turned out to be false, such as:

We were told that each of us would immediately be getting a list of certain account numbers that we were to file claims against. That didnt happen.

We were told that important inside Intel of breaking news was being sent to everyone, yet we received old information that was readily available to anybody on the Internet.

There have been numerous other statements since February that have not proven out. I am not saying that any of this was intentional I dont believe it was. I believe the mishandling of our Notice package was merely due to the lack of knowledge or experience, and the reluctance to ask for or accept help or advice from others.

The only viable reason that was given by the core facilitators for refusing to allow the process to be done again was that it might jeopardize those who signed the original Notice. Yet they were posted on various websites for all to see. If those people who were brave enough to stand up and sign those documents believe that their names are not known, they are fooling themselves. Besides, sending the Notice again (but properly this time) would merely amount to a second notice they would have no more exposure than they did the first time. Doing the process a second time would do no harm.

Our future and the future of this Nation are at stake. We all know the system is crumbling and time is short the signs are everywhere. We have all put our fate into the hands of one person one vulnerable human being. We have done what was asked, and nothing has happened that we were led to believe would happen, and

- 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

now we are to sit and wait until someone hears from the mysterious trustee.

We must provide lawful authority for our military to follow before everything completely caves in and it is too late. We cannot afford to wait. Our fate should not rest in the hands of one or two vulnerable people. Each of us should have solid evidential proof of our lawful standing and authority to direct the military. We stood up and put our names on the line - Isnt it time to finally take control of our own destiny? When are we all going to stop acting like sheeple and stand up together as a group and be heard!

There is only one solution - since the core facilitators refuse to allow us access to our document package, and/or refuse to provide the proper chain of custody documentation (because they dont have it), and refuse to discuss it or give any valid reason why it should not be done again, the Notice process must be repeated this time correctly.

It has been stated many times that there are no leaders in this project, it is everyones project and everyone has a say, yet when People ask the wrong questions, or if they make certain suggestions, they are labeled as troublemakers. We have been told many things that were revealed as untrue, what to accept and what to ignore, how and when we should communicate with each other, among others too numerous to list.

I expect to get some harsh criticism for sending this plea out thats OK lets talk, but there are many other people that agree with me.

I, for one, do not want history to show that we had our chance, but blew it that we did not do everything in our power to correct the events that happened when we knew or believed it was wrong. I do not want to have to explain to my family that we failed to take the options needed to secure their future when we had the chance. Do you?

There will be a Nation State conference call on Tuesday, July 3, at 8:30 PM

- 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

eastern time: Let your voice be heard your fate, and the fate of your Posterity and your Country is in your hands. Do you really want to rely on hearsay instead of evidence? Think and pray about it.

Phone Number: (724) 444-7444 Call ID: 121596

Respectfully submitted by gene

- 7