Casey Inspection Report

MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
2-DIST B.I.N.
PAGE
OF
79
STRUCTURES INSPECTION FIELD REPORT

ROUTINE & SPECIAL MEMBER INSPECTION
8.-STRUCTURE NO. 11-Kilo. POINT
BR. DEPT. NO.
06
CITY/TOWN
4EX
B-16-367
41-STATUS
90-ROUTINE INSP. DATE
BOSTON
07-FACILITY CARRIED
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
MEMORIAL NAME/LOCAL NAME
001.979
27-YR BUILT
D:OPEN 1991
JAN 16, 2012 2011

M. P. Griffin
106-YR REBUILT YR REHAB'D (NON 106)
ST203 ARBORWAY
06-FEATURES INTERSECTED
047 CASEY OVERPASS

26-FUNCTIONAL CLASS
1951
DIST. BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER
COMB WASH ST&AMTK&ORNG

43-STRUCTURE TYPE
Urban Arterial
22-OWNER 21-MAINTAINER TEAM LEADER C. Seman PROJ MGR Transystems
302 : Steel Stringer/Girder

107-DECK TYPE
State Highway State Highway Agency Agency

WEATHER TEMP. (air) TEAM MEMBERS
4 : Closed Grating
ITEM 58
Varied 5
DEF
5C 4
J. CAHILL, T. FRANCIOSA
ITEM 60
DEF
ITEM 59
4
DEF
Dive Cur
DECK
1. Wearing surface
SUPERSTRUCTURE
1. Stringers
5
5
M-P
S-P
3
N
S-P
-
SUBSTRUCTURE 1. Abutments
a. Pedestals
b. Bridge Seats
6
M-P M-P M-P M-P M-P -
2. Deck Condition
3. Stay-in-Place Forms
2. Floorbeams
3. Floor System Bracing
4. Girders or Beams 5. Trusses - General
a. Upper Chords b. Lower Chords c. Web Members
M-P
N
5 N N
M-P -
c. Backwalls
d. Breastwalls
e. Wingwalls
4. Curbs
6
6 7
M-P
M-P -
5. Median
6. Sidewalks
N 5 5 4 M-P M-P S-A S-A M-P
f. Slope Paving/Rip-Rap
g. Pointing h. Footings i. Piles j. Scour k. Settlement

l. m.
7. Parapets
N
6 N
M-P
N
N
8. Railing
9. Anti Missile Fence 10.Drainage System
d. Lateral Bracing
N
N N N
N N N N N N N N N N N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N 6 6 6 6 N 6 H H N 7
N N
e. Sway Bracings
4
4 4
M-P
S-P S-P
f. Portals
g. End Posts
11.Lighting Standards
12.Utilities 13.Deck Joints
2. Piers or Bents
a. Pedestals b. Straddle Piers
4
4 5 5 6 5 H H N 7 N N S-A M-P M-P M-P M-P -
6. Pin & Hangers 7. Conn Plt's, Gussets & Angles 8. Cover Plates 9. Bearing Devices
4
6
N
S-P
M-P
-
c. Hammerhead Piers
d. Pierwalls
14.Shielding
15. 16.
N
e. Cant. Beam Brackets

f. Footing g. Piles h. Scour i. Settlement
N
S
10. Diaphragms
11. Rivets & Bolts
3
5 5 4 4
N X
CURB REVEAL
(In millimeters)
12. Welds
13. Member Alignment
DEF
M-P
S-A
j. k.
APPROACHES
a. Appr. Pavement Condition b. Appr. Roadway Settlement
14. Paint/Coating 15.
S-P
-
3. Pile Bents
a. Pile Caps
b. Piles
N
N N N N N
5 5 7
5
(Y/N)
M-P M-P M-P

Year Painted
c. Diagonal Bracing
d. Horizontal Bracing e. Fasteners
c. Appr. Sidewalk Settlement

d. Appr. Sidewalks & Median
COLLISION DAMAGE: Please explain None ( ) Minor ( ) Moderate ( X ) Severe (

LOAD DEFLECTION: Please explain None ( ) Minor ( X ) Moderate ( ) Severe ( LOAD VIBRATION: None ( ) Minor (
Please explain ) Moderate ( X ) Severe (
UNDERMINING (Y/N)
If YES please explain
OVERHEAD SIGNS
(Attached to bridge)
N
DEF
COLLISION DAMAGE: None ( X ) Minor ( ) Moderate ( SCOUR: Please explain None ( X ) Minor ( ) Moderate (
I-60 (Dive Report):
) Severe (
a. Condition of Welds
N N
Any Fracture Critical Member: (Y/N)

Any Cracks:
(Y/N)
) Severe (
b. Condition of Bolts
c. Condition of Signs
I-60 (This Report):
93B-U/W (DIVE) Insp
00/00/00
X=UNKNOWN
RTN(1)7-96
N=NOT APPLICABLE H=HIDDEN/INACCESSIBLE
R=REMOVED
PAGE CITY/TOWN B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO. 8.-STRUCTURE NO.
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
ITEM 61 CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION
Dive Cur
4EX N
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
36 COND DEF
JAN 16, 2012

(Y/N/P)
Needed Used
ITEM 36 TRAFFIC SAFETY

A. Bridge Railing
B. Transitions
ACCESSIBILITY
6 7 6 7
3S2
DEF
C. Approach Guardrail
1. Channel Scour
2. Embankment Erosion 3. Debris
N
N
N
N
N
D. Approach Guardrail Ends
1 1 0 0
H 3
M-P M-P X
Single
Lift Bucket Ladder Boat Waders Inspector 50 Rigging Staging Traffic Control RR Flagger Police
Y Y
Y Y
N N
N
N N
N
WEIGHT POSTING
Actual Posting
Recommended Posting
Waived Date:
Signs In Place (Y=Yes,N=No, NR=NotRequired) Legibility/ Visibility
Not Applicable
N N Y N Y N
4. Vegetation
5. Utilities 6. Rip-Rap/Slope Protection
N
N N
N
N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N Y N Y N
00/00/00
EJDMT Date:
00/00/00
7. Aggradation
8. Fender System
N
N
N
N
At bridge E W
Other Advance E W
Other:
TOTAL HOURS
N
ft in ft
99
(Y/N):
CLEARANCE POSTING
Not Applicable
STREAM FLOW VELOCITY:
Tidal (
S
in
meter
PLANS (V.C.R.)
TAPE#:
Actual Field Measurement

) Low ( )None (
11 0
9 9
11 10
3.02
) High (
) Moderate (
X) N
Posted Clearance
(Y/N):
ITEM 61 (Dive Report):
ITEM 61 (This Report)
93b-U/W INSP. DATE:
00/00/00
Y

(To be filled out by DBIE)
At bridge N S
Advance N S
N
7
Y
7
List of field tests performed:
RATING
Rating Report (Y/N):
Date:
If YES please give priority:
Request for Rating or Rerating (Y/N):
HIGH (
) MEDIUM (
LOW (
05/01/2010
REASON:
Inspection data at time of existing rating I 58: 5 I 59: 4 I 60: 3 Date : 01/29/2010
CONDITION RATING GUIDE

CODE
(For Items 58, 59, 60 and 61)
CONDITION
NOT APPLICABLE EXCELLENT VERY GOOD GOOD SATISFACTORY FAIR POOR SERIOUS CRITICAL
"IMMINENT" FAILURE
Excellent condition.
DEFECTS
N G G 9 8
No problem noted. Some minor problems.
G
F F P P C
7
6 5 4 3 2
Structural elements show some minor deterioration. All primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling or scour. Advance section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
Loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
Advance deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken. Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stablility. Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may put it back in light service.
1 0
FAILED
Out of service - beyond corrective action.
DEFICIENCY REPORTING GUIDE

DEFICIENCY:
A defect in a structure that requires corrective action.
CATEGORIES OF DEFICIENCIES: minor in nature, generally do not structural integrity of the bridge and could easily be repaired. Examples include but are not limited to: Spalled concrete, Minor pot M= Minor Deficiency - Deficiencies which are of steel, Minor scouring, Clogged impact theetc. holes, Minor corrosion drainage,
S= Severe/Major Deficiency -
Deficiencies which are more extensive in nature and need more planning and effort to repair. Examples include but are not limited to: Moderate to major deterioration in concrete, Exposed and corroded rebars, Considerable settlement, Considerable scouring or undermining, Moderate to extensive corrosion to structural steel with measurable loss of section, etc.
C-S= Critical Structural Deficiency C-H= Critical Hazard Deficiency URGENCY OF REPAIR:
I = ImmediateA = ASAPP = PrioritizeRTB(2)04-07
A deficiency in a structural element of a bridge that poses an extreme unsafe condition due to the failure or imminent failure of the element which will affect the structural integrity of the bridge.
A deficiency in a component or element of a bridge that poses an extreme hazard or unsafe condition to the public, but does not impair the structural integrity of the bridge. Examples include but are not limited to: Loose concrete hanging down over traffic or pedestrians, A hole in a sidewalk that may cause injuries to pedestrians, Missing section of bridge railing, etc.
[Inspector(s) immediately contact District Bridge Inspection Engineer (DBIE) to report the Deficiency and to receive further instruction from him/her].
[Action/Repair should be initiated by District Maintenance Engineer or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) upon receipt of the Inspection Report]. [Shall be prioritized by District Maintenance Engineer or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) and repairs made when funds and/or manpower is available].
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

2-DIST B.I.N.
PAGE
OF 79
STRUCTURES INSPECTION FIELD REPORT

ROUTINE & SPECIAL MEMBER INSPECTION
8.-STRUCTURE NO. 11-Kilo. POINT 90-ROUTINE INSP. DATE
BR. DEPT. NO.
06
CITY/TOWN
4EX
B-16-367
93*-SPEC. MEMB. INSP. DA
BOSTON
07-FACILITY CARRIED
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
MEMORIAL NAME/LOCAL NAME
001.979
Jan 16, 2012
Jan 16, 2012 2011

M. P. Griffin
27-YR BUILT
106-YR REBUILT *YR REHAB'D (NON 106)
ST203 ARBORWAY
06-FEATURES INTERSECTED
047 CASEY OVERPASS

26-FUNCTIONAL CLASS
1951
1991
DIST. BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER
COMB WASH ST&AMTK&ORNG

43-STRUCTURE TYPE
Urban Arterial
State Highway State Highway Agency Agency
WEATHER TEMP. (air) 22-OWNER 21-MAINTAINER TEAM LEADER C. Seman PROJ MGR Transystems
302 : Steel Stringer/Girder

107-DECK TYPE
TEAM MEMBERS
4 : Closed Grating
WEIGHT POSTING
H
Varied
Not Applicable
3 3S2 Single
5C
E
J. CAHILL, T. FRANCIOSA
At bridge Advance
X
PLANS
(Y/N):
Y N
Actual Posting
Recommended Posting
Waived Date:
N
00/00/00
(V.C.R.)
TAPE#:
(Y/N):
00/00/00
EJDMT Date:
RATING
Rating Report (Y/N):
Request for Rating or Rerating (Y/N): Date:
If YES please give priority:

HIGH (
05/01/2010
REASON:
) MEDIUM (
) LOW (
I 58: 5
Inspection data at time of existing rating I 59: 4 I 60: 3 I 62: Date : 01/29/2010
SPECIAL MEMBER(S):
MEMBER
CRACK
(Y/N):
WELD'S CONDITION
(0-9)
LOCATION OF CORROSION, SECTION LOSS (%), CRACKS, COLLISION DAMAGE, STRESS CONCENTRATION, ETC.
CONDITION
PREVIOUS PRESENT
(0-9)
(0-9)
INV. RATING OF MEMBER FROM RATING H-20 3 3S2
Deficiencies
Item 59.1 Stringers Item 59.9 B Bearing Devices Item 59.10 C Diaphragms
A
Y Y
N N
4 4
See remarks in comments section. See remarks in comments section. See remarks in comments section.
See remarks in comments section. See remarks in comments section.
3
5
3
4
Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
I-58 I-59 I-60
S-P
S-A S-A
S-A S-A
I-62
3
5
3
4
Item 59.13 - Member

D Alignment
E
Item 60.2.a Pedestals
List of field tests performed:
(Overall Previous Condition)
5 5
4
4
4 4
(Overall Current Condition)

DEFICIENCY:
A defect in a structure that requires corrective action.
CATEGORIES OF DEFICIENCIES: minor in nature, generally do not structural integrity of the bridge and could easily be repaired. Examples include but are not limited to: Spalled concrete, Minor pot M= Minor Deficiency - Deficiencies which are of steel, Minor scouring, Clogged impact theetc. holes, Minor corrosion drainage,
S= Severe/Major Deficiency -
Deficiencies which are more extensive in nature and need more planning and effort to repair. Examples include but are not limited to: Moderate to major deterioration in concrete, Exposed and corroded rebars, Considerable settlement, Considerable scouring or undermining, Moderate to extensive corrosion to structural steel with measurable loss of section, etc.
A deficiency in a structural element of a bridge that poses an extreme unsafe condition due to the failure or imminent failure of the element which will affect the structural integrity of the bridge. A deficiency in a component or element of a bridge that poses an extreme hazard or unsafe condition to the public, but does not impair the structural integrity of the bridge. Examples include but are not limited to: Loose concrete hanging down over traffic or pedestrians, A hole in a sidewalk that may cause injuries to pedestrians, Missing section of bridge railing, etc.
C-S= Critical Structural Deficiency C-H= Critical Hazard Deficiency -
URGENCY OF REPAIR:
I = ImmediateA = ASAPP = Prioritize[Inspector(s) immediately contact District Bridge Inspection Engineer (DBIE) to report the Deficiency and to receive further instruction from him/her].
[Action/Repair should be initiated by District Maintenance Engineer or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) upon receipt of the Inspection Report]. [Shall be prioritized by District Maintenance Engineer or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) and repairs made when funds and/or manpower is available].
X=UNKNOWN
F.C.(1)7-96
N=NOT APPLICABLE
H=HIDDEN/INACCESSIBLE
R=REMOVED
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
BRIDGE ORIENTATION This bridge is oriented from east to west and south to north. GENERAL REMARKS Casey Overpass (B-16-367 (4EX)) carries State Route 203 eastbound and westbound through the City of Boston over several city streets, a parking lot for the West Roxbury Municipal Court and the MBTA Forest Hills Station (see sketches 1 & 2 and photo 1). The bridge consists of steel multi-beam spans with fascia girders and reinforced concrete piers. The spans are numbered from 1 to 20 from east to west. The 19 piers are lettered from A to U from east to west excluding letters "I" and "O". The original rolled steel beams are numbered from 1 to 14 from south to north, and the built-up riveted steel fascia girders are designated as south and north. Sidewalk and median stringers have been added since original construction and are designated by their location; either north or south. Piers A and B are pierwalls, piers C through L and S through U are hammerhead piers, and piers M through R are straddle piers. The bridge labeling system follows the convention set in the previous inspection reports. The bridge currently carries one centrally located lane of traffic in each direction as a result of the installation of thrie beam guardrails (see sketch 3 and photo 2). This guardrail restricts live load from beams 1, 2, 7, 8, 13 and 14 as well as the median stringers. CLEARANCE POSTING NOTE The Arborway turnaround roadway is posted for a vertical under clearance of 9'-10"; a minimum vertical under clearance of 9'-11" was measured beneath the north fascia girder in span 3 at the east curb line. SPECIAL MEMBERS The special members for this inspection are select stringers, bearing devices, diaphragms and pedestals along with member alignment. SCOPE OF INSPECTION The scope of the routine and special member inspection covered by this report was to determine the physical and functional condition of the bridge, to identify any changes from previously recorded conditions, and to ensure that the structure continues to satisfy present service requirements. It includes close-up, hands on inspection of selected members and identified special members (at worse-case locations) to establish condition codings; identify deficiencies/defects that require corrective action; and determine the urgency of any needed repairs. WORK ACCESS NOTES A 42 foot bucket truck and ladders were used to access this structure. Access to the spans over the parking lot for the West Roxbury Municipal Court (spans 4 through 10) was coordinated with courthouse personnel. Access for the inspection of the spans over the MBTA Forest Hills Station busway (spans 12 through 17) was coordinated with the on-duty bus inspector. Alternating lane closures on South Street and Washington Street were utilized for this inspection. All areas of this structure were inspected during the day. ITEM 58 - DECK Item 58.1 - Wearing surface (Fair): The latex modified concrete wearing surface typically exhibits hairline map cracking throughout and scattered up to 3/16" wide transverse cracks with light rust staining and/or efflorescence. There are numerous bituminous and portland cement concrete repairs throughout the wearing surface, some of which exhibit areas of map cracks, delaminations and spalls. The wearing surface within the current live traffic
REM.(2)7-96
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Item 58.1 - Wearing surface (Cont'd) lanes exhibits isolated, up to 1 1/2" deep, random spalls (see photo 3). The eastbound roadway adjacent to the deck joint at pier U in span 20 exhibits a full width by 4" long by 2" deep spall (see photo 4). The portions of the wearing surface outside of the thrie beam guardrail typically exhibit more severe areas of delamination and spalling. The most severe location is located in the eastbound roadway of span 13 along the median. There is a 22'-0" long by 6" wide by 3" deep spall with an adjacent 7'-0" long by 2'-3" wide delamination heaved up to 3 1/2" high (see photo 5). In addition, locations along the curbs adjacent to the deck joints typically have up to 3" deep spalls with exposed reinforcing and delaminations (see photo 6). Item 58.2 - Deck Condition (Fair): The deck is comprised of a concrete filled steel grid with stay-in-place forms. The underside of the steel grid deck typically exhibits heavy rust with up to 1/16" section loss to the main grid bars. There are random areas of moisture leakage through the deck near the deck joints. Also, there is water leakage at the anchor bolts for the thrie beam guardrail posts (see photo 7). The exposed areas of the underside of the concrete fill exhibit heavy scaling and efflorescence in locations where the stay-in-place forms exhibit 100% loss (see photo 7). There is typically pack rust between the top flange of the beams and the underside of the grid deck which appears to be causing the deck to be bowed upward over the beams in many locations. The worst case is above beams 2 through 6 at the west end of span 12 at pier M. The grid deck in this areas is bowed upward, up to 1 3/4", and not bearing on the top flange of the beams (see photos 8 & 9). This condition occurs over a length of 12'-0" from pier M. The maximum upward bow at these beams occurs about 5'-0" from pier M. The deck exhibits approximately 1/8" of live load deflection in this area. Similar but less severe gaps occur in scattered areas throughout the underside of deck. Most of these gaps appear to be approximately 1/2" due to impacted rust between the underside of grid deck and the top flange of the beams. No live load deflection was noted at any of these areas. The concrete along the fascia typically exhibits minor edge spalls and areas of delaminated concrete. In addition, at random locations there are gaps of 1/4" to 3/4" between the top flange of the fascia girders and the underside of the deck where these edge spalls exist (see photo 10). Fabric shielding has been installed at the majority of these locations since the previous inspection. Item 58.3 - Stay-in-Place Forms (Serious): The stay-in-place forms typically exhibit areas of heavy rust with 100% loss (see photo 7). This condition is generally more severe at the deck joints. Item 58.4 - Curbs (Satisfactory): The curbs consist of granite curbs throughout the majority of the length of the bridge except at the deck joints where there are 2'-0" long sections of concrete curb. These concrete curbs are spalled at several locations. The most notable location is at the south curb of the eastbound roadway at the west abutment deck joint in span 20. There is a full height by full width by 2'-0" long spall with an exposed tie bar and minimal concrete remaining. Several locations of spalled concrete curbs adjacent to the deck joints have been repaired since the previous inspection. The granite curbs are typically in good condition. Item 58.5 - Median (Satisfactory): The raised concrete median typically exhibits transverse hairline cracking for the entire length of the structure.
REM.(2)7-96
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Item 58.8 - Railing (Satisfactory): There is a steel pedestrian railing with pickets along each fascia. This railing typically exhibits moderate peeling paint and scattered locations of missing fasteners at the sleeved connections to the railing posts for the longitudinal pipe railing. Tree branches have grown between the pickets of the north pedestrian railing in spans 5 and 6 (see photo 11). There is a single steel pipe railing, atop the curbs at the sidewalks, which is no longer exposed to traffic due to the installation of thrie beam guardrail. This railing exhibits moderate peeling paint throughout. The traffic railing along the roadway consists of thrie beam guardrail. The top 6" of the plastic guardrail blocking is cracked and/or missing in scattered locations due to collision damage (see photo 12). Item 58.10 - Drainage System (Poor): The roadway scupper grates are typically almost completely clogged with sand, leaves and debris (see photo 13). The sidewalk scupper grates are typically partially plugged with leaves and debris. Several locations exhibit moderate vegetation growth (see photo 14). Also, there were up to 14'-0" long by full width areas of ponding water as a result of plugged sidewalk scuppers on the sidewalk in span 14 at the time of this inspection. There is a broken grating bar to the scupper on the south sidewalk near pier C in span 4. The drainpipes typically exhibit heavy rust with minor section loss, particularly beneath the median. Also, scattered drainpipe hangers have become disconnected, ineffective, loose and are hanging from the drainpipe (see photo 15). Item 58.11 - Lighting Standards (Poor): The under-bridge lighting standards are mounted to the underside of the beams and piers. Many lights are not functioning and random fixtures have missing or broken lens covers. The lighting fixture at pier F in span 7 is completely detached from the structure and is only attached to the utility conduit by heavily rusted light gauge wire (see photo 16). There are highway lighting standards along the median. These lights were not functioning at the time of inspection. The hand hole covers on the light poles typically have one of two fasteners missing. Some of the hand hole covers are dislodged exposing the wires inside. Isolated concrete light poles exhibit minor spalling and cracking near the base, especially surrounding the hand hole covers. Some of these light poles exhibit minor vibration when pushed. The following is a summary of other notable deficiencies on the lighting standards: The bottom portion of the lighting standard in span 1 exhibits a 3'-0" high by 1" wide by 1/2" deep spall with exposed reinforcing (see photo 17). The lighting standard on the median in span 10 has one of four anchor bolts missing (see photo 18). The north light fixture of the lighting standard on the median in span 13 is missing. The lighting standards on the median in spans 12, 15 and 16 have been removed.
REM.(2)7-96
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Item 58.12 - Utilities (Poor): The 1" diameter utility conduits in spans 1 through 9 for the under-bridge lighting fixtures have scattered areas of heavy rust with moderate section loss. There are clips which fasten this conduit to the underside of the bottom flange of beam 8. At the east end of span 8, there are ten consecutive broken clips which cause the conduit to sag 1'-0" over a 40' length (see photo 19). The east half of span 5 has an 8" sag in the conduit due to two consecutive broken clips. The conduit in the east half of span 6 is similar. The roadway median has embedded utility pull boxes adjacent to the highway lighting standards. The steel covers typically exhibit heavy rust and typically have three of four fasteners missing. Scattered covers are missing all of the fasteners and are ajar, exposing the wires inside. There are a few locations where plywood has been used in place of the original pull box covers and the wood is moderately weathered. There is a heavily rusted junction box with exposed wires on the east face near the base of pier C and a disconnected utility conduit on the east face at the base of pier H. Item 58.13 - Deck Joints (Poor): The longitudinal deck joint at the median and the roadway deck joints at the piers allow extensive water leakage. The roadway deck joints are typically filled with sand. The roadway deck joints exhibit up to 2 1/2" of vertical differential between the adjacent wearing surface and top of the deck joints (see photo 20). This creates an uneven riding surface. There is a crack in the east joint armor near the north end of the deck joint at pier L in the eastbound roadway (see photo 21). Also, the section of the joint armor south of the crack has separated from the concrete. There is an 8" long section of torn joint seal at the north end of the deck joint at pier U in the westbound roadway. The east joint armor plate at the west abutment deck joint in the eastbound roadway has rotated westward at the south end leaving a 1/4" gap between the joint armor and the concrete wearing surface. The sidewalk deck joints have asphaltic material adjacent to the rubber plug seals. Scattered sidewalk deck joints have loose seals that exhibit moderate cracking and heaving. The north sidewalk joint seal at pier T is torn and dislodged for the full width of the sidewalk (see photo 22). The north sidewalk joint seal at pier R is similar but less severe. There are vertical differentials of up to 1 1/2" at random sidewalk deck joints (see photo 23). There are joint seals on the face of the curbs at the median and both sides of the sidewalks. In some locations, the asphaltic material adjacent to the joint seal is cracked and heaved (see photo 24). At numerous locations, the vertical sections of the joint seals are dislodged due to apparent plow damage (see photo 13). Item 58.14 - Shielding (Satisfactory): There is fabric shielding installed between the fascia girders and the first interior beam in the majority of the spans which are over parking areas, city streets and sidewalks. The fabric shielding typically has scattered minor tears and light debris accumulation. The fabric shielding is torn at the locations of collision damage to the fascia girders in span 3.
REM.(2)7-96
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
APPROACHES Approaches a - Appr. Pavement Condition (Fair): The bituminous pavement at the approaches typically exhibits minor wheel line rutting and up to 1/4" wide longitudinal and transverse cracks. There is a 1'-0" long by full width region of heavy map cracking adjacent to the west abutment in the eastbound roadway of the west approach (see photo 25). Approaches b - Appr. Roadway Settlement (Fair): There is 2" of settlement to the eastbound roadway in the vicinity of the west abutment at the west approach (see photo 25). There was no settlement noted at the east abutment. Approaches d - Appr. Sidewalks & Median (Fair): The concrete median at the east approach, adjacent to the east abutment, exhibits severe scaling over a length of 9'-0". The west approach median, adjacent to the west abutment, has a 4'-0" long by up to full width area of heavy scaling. Also, at this location, in the eastbound roadway there is a 10'-0" long section of dislodged granite curb. Approximately 50'-0" from the west abutment, at the second lighting standard west of the west abutment, the concrete median has a 10'-0" long by full width by up to 10" deep spall with exposed reinforcing and utility conduits (see photo 26). This spall undermines two of four anchor bolts for the lighting standard. ITEM 59 - SUPERSTRUCTURE Item 59.1 - Stringers (Serious): The median and sidewalk stringers are supported by brackets which are cantilevered off of the adjacent beams. It should be noted that the stringers are not subject to live load due to the current configuration of the roadway. The median and sidewalk stringers typically exhibit areas of heavy rust with minor to moderate section loss. Sidewalk Stringers: The sidewalk stringer ends at the deck joints exhibit the heaviest deterioration with areas of 100% loss to the web (see sketches 4 & 5 and photos 27 & 28). Based upon the 1991 reconstruction of the sidewalks, the sidewalk stringers experience reduced loading from their original design as the current reinforced concrete sidewalk slab is capable of spanning over the sidewalk stringer between the fascia girder and the first interior beam (see sketch 3). Median Stringers: There is up to 3/16" section loss to the web at the ends of the north median stringer and moderate section loss to the flanges of the north median stringers at midspan (see sketch 5 and photo 29). The south face of the north median stringer is encased in concrete. There is up to 2" of impacted rust between the top flange of the north median stringer and the underside of the deck at scattered locations. The stringers in sketches 4 and 5 are considered special members. The south median stringers have been replaced throughout the length of the bridge. The south median stringers are in good condition. Gaps were noted between the top flange of these stringers and the underside of the original concrete deck in various locations.
REM.(2)7-96
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Item 59.4 - Girders or Beams (Fair): Beams: The beams at the median (beams 7 and 8) and at the curb lines (beams 2 and 13) typically exhibit heavy rust with minor section loss to the web at the ends (see sketches 6 - 8 and photos 30 & 31). It should be noted that these beams are not subject to live load due to the current configuration of the roadway. Beams 2 and 13 exhibit areas heavy rust with minor section loss to the flanges in the midspan region (see sketch 6 and photo 32). These beams typically exhibit approximately 1/8" section loss to the top surface of the top flange and 1/16" section loss to the top surface of the bottom flange. Beams 7 and 8 typically have heavy rust delamination with minor to moderate section loss to the top surface of the flanges and lower portion of the web, on the side facing the median joint throughout the length of the beam (see sketches 7 & 8). The remaining beams exhibit random areas of peeling paint with heavy rust. The bottom flange cover plates on the beams are connected to the bottom flange with intermittent fillet welds. Fascia Girders: The fascia girders exhibit random areas of heavy rust on the lower portion of the web and on the bottom flange. The top surface the bottom flange cover plate overhang typically exhibits random areas of heavy rust delamination with up to 1/8" section loss. The bottom flange cover plates are connected to the flange angles with intermittent fillet welds. There are numerous local minor bends and dings on the bottom flange cover plates of the fascia girders. These bends are typically 1/2" over a length of 6" and are most prominent in the spans over the courthouse parking lot. In span 3, over the Arborway turnaround roadway, there is moderate collision damage to the south bottom flange at midspan of the north fascia girder resulting in a 3'-0" long by 2 1/2" wide tear in the cover plate (see photo 33). The south fascia girder in span 3 exhibits minor scrapes on the underside of the bottom flange. This collision damage has been previously noted and remains the same since the previous inspection. The north bottom flange at the eastern 1/3 point of the north fascia girder in span 5 is bent downward 3" over a 2'-6" length (see photo 34). Item 59.7 - Conn Plt's, Gussets & Angles (Fair): There is heavy rust with minor section loss on the connection angles below the leaking deck joints. Item 59.8 - Cover Plates (Fair): There are areas of moderate to heavy rust on the cover plates, particularly on beams 2, 7, 8 and 13. See Item 59.4 for additional comments.
REM.(2)7-96
10
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Item 59.9 - Bearing Devices (Poor): At numerous rocker bearings, one of the keeper plates which is attached to the sole plate on the bottom flange of the beam has broken off or the weld has cracked due to lateral movement of the beam (see photo 35). The maximum lateral movement of the beam was measured as 2" (see charts 1-5 and photos 36 & 37). These rocker bearings are considered special members due to this unrestrained lateral movement. Numerous rocker bearings exhibit pack rust between the curved surface of the rocker and the masonry plate. The pack rust appears to be jacking the bearings upward. In some locations, there are maximum gaps of 7/8" between the underside of the rocker and the masonry plate where there used to be pack rust and now exposes the pintels (see charts 1-5 and photos 38 & 39). These rocker bearings with sizeable gaps and uneven bearing conditions are considered special members. There are two rocker bearings where the bottom of the sole plate is not bearing on the top portion of the rocker bearing (see chart 1 and photo 40). In addition, numerous rocker bearings appear frozen in the over-expanded position by heavy rust delamination (see charts 1-5 and photo 41). Based upon temperatures in the 30's (Fahrenheit) at the time of inspection, the rocker bearings were expected to be contracted rather than expanded. Isolated rocker bearings have loose anchor bolt nuts (see chart 5). The rocker and fixed bearings typically exhibit heavy rust with minor section loss, particularly at beams 1, 2, 7, 8, 13 and 14. The north anchor bolt for the beam 5 fixed bearing in span 1 at the east abutment is missing a nut. The north anchor bolt nut for the beam 12 fixed bearing in span 3 at pier B is backed off (see photo 42). Item 59.10 - Diaphragms (Serious): The diaphragms which are rolled W-sections cantilevered off of beam 8, on the north side of the longitudinal median joint (north median diaphragms) typically exhibit heavy rust with areas of moderate to severe section loss. Isolated north median diaphragms exhibit up to 1'-1" high holes in the web (see photo 43). The third diaphragm west of pier L in span 12 along the north median stringer exhibits 100% loss to the entire bottom flange. Also at this location, the web of the W-section is disconnected from the median stringer connection angles due to 9" high corrosion holes and is considered ineffective (see photo 44). The south median diaphragms have been replaced and are in satisfactory condition with areas of light rust. It should be noted that these diaphragms are not subject to live load due to the current configuration of the roadway. The end channel diaphragms at the piers exhibit up to full height by up to full length holes in the web and up to 100% loss to the bottom flange over the full length of the member, particularly between the fascia girders and first two interior beams (see photos 45 and 46). There are knee braces at beams 7 and 8 for the end channel diaphragms at the piers which support the median stringers. The angles which comprise the knee braces and the channels are typically severely deteriorated, some are ineffective due to advanced section loss (see photo 47). The interior channel diaphragms are in fair condition and exhibit areas of light to heavy rust with minimal section loss.
REM.(2)7-96
11
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Item 59.11 - Rivets & Bolts (Fair): There is heavy rust with up to 50% section loss to the rivets at the connection plates and angles below the leaking deck joints. Item 59.12 - Welds (Fair): The bottom flange cover plates for the rolled beams and fascia girders are connected with intermittent fillet welds. These welds typically exhibit moderate rust. There is a 2 1/2" long longitudinal crack at the base of the weld between the sole plate and the south bottom flange of beam 10 at pier R in span 16 (see photo 48). The end channel diaphragms are connected to connection angles by two fillet welds. There are cracked welds at the end diaphragm connections to the south fascia girder and beams 7, 11, 12, 13 and 14 at pier U in span 19 (see photo 49). There are similar cracked welds at the end diaphragm connections at beams 2 and 6 at pier U in span 20. See Item 59.9 for additional comments. Item 59.13 - Member Alignment (Poor): There is 1 1/2" of lateral misalignment of the superstructure at pier U. Span 19 appears to have shifted south relative to span 20 (see photo 50). There is 1" of lateral misalignment of the superstructure at pier J on the north fascia, however, the fascia on the south side remains even. The lateral movement at the bearings appears to have shifted the superstructure in spans 8, 10, 11 and 13 through 20. See Item 59.9 for additional comments. Item 59.14 - Paint/Coating (Poor): The paint system is failing at various locations throughout the superstructure, particularly near the deck joints. SuperStructure Collision Notes The north and south fascia girders typically have minor collision damage to the bottom flanges throughout the length of the bridge. The north fascia girder exhibits moderate collision damage at midspan of span 3. See Item 59.4 for additional comments. SuperStructure Load Deflection Notes There is minor deflection under heavy live load. SuperStructure Load Vibration Notes There is moderate vibration under heavy live load. ITEM 60 - SUBSTRUCTURE Item 60.1 - Abutments Item 60.1.b - Bridge Seats (Satisfactory): There is up to 5" deep debris accumulation on the west abutment bridge seat. There is 1'-4" high accumulation of pigeon debris between the web of the north fascia girder and bridge seat at the west abutment. There is an 11" diameter by 3" deep spall in the west abutment bridge seat on the south side of the bearing for beam 6.
REM.(2)7-96
12
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Item 60.1.c - Backwalls (Satisfactory): There are a few hairline vertical cracks in both abutment backwalls. The vertical cracks in the backwalls typically align with vertical cracks in the breastwalls. There is a 3'-0" wide by 1'-6" high by 3" deep spall at the north end and a 1'-0" diameter delamination at the south end of the east abutment backwall. There is a 2'-0" wide by full height by 1 1/2" deep spall with exposed reinforcing in the west abutment backwall between the south fascia girder and beam 1. Item 60.1.d - Breastwalls (Satisfactory): There are a few hairline vertical cracks with efflorescence and rust stains which are typically located beneath the bearings at both abutment breastwalls. There is a 2'-0" diameter delamination beneath the median at the top of the east abutment breastwall. Between beams 9 and 10 at the west abutment, there is an up to 1/8" wide full height vertical crack (see photo 51). At this crack, the south portion of the breastwall appears to have rotated eastward in relation to the north portion of the breastwall. There is 3/8" vertical differential between the bridge seat portions at the top of the crack. There is extensive debris accumulation adjacent to the east abutment breastwall. Item 60.1.e - Wingwalls (Satisfactory): The wingwalls are faced with brick masonry for the majority of the height. The brick is supported on granite headers atop a concrete base near the ground level. Two sections of granite headers (2'-1" and 3'-4" long sections) are missing at the base of the northwest wingwall, located approximately 100' from the west abutment (see photo 52). The concrete base for the wingwalls has numerous horizontal and vertical hairline cracks with efflorescence and minor to moderate spalls. The mortar between the granite headers and the concrete base is typically deteriorated and spalled. There is a 9'-0" long by up to 2'-6" high by 5" deep spall with exposed reinforcing in the concrete base at the east end of the southwest wingwall. There is also a 7'-0" long by 5" high by 1 1/2" deep spall in the concrete base of the southwest wingwall located approximately 50' from the west abutment. There is a 3'-0" long by 2'-0" high by 3" deep spall in the concrete base of the northwest wingwall at the west abutment breastwall (see photo 53). There is 5/16" of separation between the masonry facing at the northwest wingwall and the concrete which comprises the west abutment breastwall (see photo 54). The masonry appears to have rotated northward. There is also an 1/8" wide by 12'-0" long horizontal crack in the mortar joint of the upper masonry course of the northwest wingwall, just beneath the granite cap stone, at the east end where it meets the bridge railing. Item 60.1.g - Pointing (Satisfactory): The mortar joints for the masonry portions of the wingwalls exhibit scattered areas of minor deterioration, particularly to the upper courses. See Item 60.1.e for additional comments.
REM.(2)7-96
13
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Item 60.2 - Piers or Bents Item 60.2.a - Pedestals (Poor): There are stepped concrete pedestals atop the pier caps which support the bearings for the beams. These pedestals appear to be constructed of nonreinforced concrete, and in many cases there is little or no edge distance between the masonry plate and the face of the pedestal. Significant amounts of water and debris has accumulated between the pedestals due to the leaking deck joints. The pedestals typically exhibit hairline to 3/16" wide vertical and longitudinal cracks, isolated areas of delamination, edge spalls, rust stains and light efflorescence. The vertical cracks are typically located beneath the bearings and often behind the anchor bolts near the rear of the masonry plates. It should be noted that beams 1, 2, 7, 8, 13 and 14 are not subject to live load due to the current configuration of the roadway. The pedestals at piers K, Q and S are considered special members in poor condition. Pier K The pedestal exhibits edge spalls along the top and up to 3/8" wide vertical cracks (see sketch 9). There are large spalls on the east face of the pedestal which expose the anchor bolts at the bearings for beams 7 and 8 in span 10 (see photos 55 and 56). Pier Q The majority of the pedestal has been repaired since the previous inspection (see sketch 10). However, the masonry pads below the fixed bearings for beams 3 through 6 at pier Q in span 15 were not formed properly, and there is severe undermining of these bearings (see photo 57). Also at pier Q in span 15, the fixed bearing for beam 2 exhibits minor undermining due to the spalling of the masonry pad (see photo 58). The portions of the concrete pedestal which were not repaired exhibit up 3/16" wide vertical and longitudinal cracks that typically propagate from the back of the bearings to the front face of the pedestal. The pedestal between beams 7 and 8 exhibits heavy spalling and punky concrete. Pier S The pedestal at pier S is similar to pier K (see sketch 11 and photos 59 & 60). The remainder of the pedestals are in fair condition. The pedestals at piers C, D, G and M exhibit large spalls and other deficiencies which are summarized as follows: Pier C The west face of the concrete pedestal between beams 7 and 8 exhibits a 5'-0" wide by full length area of concrete breakup. Pier D On the east face of the pedestal, there is a 2'-4" wide by 1'-5" high by up to 1'-2" deep spall with exposed reinforcing which undermines the concrete pedestal between beams 7 and 8 (see sketch 17 and photo 61). The concrete pedestal at this location exhibits a 1/4" wide by full length crack. Pier G On the top of the east pedestal between beams 7 and 8, there is a 4'-0" wide by full length by up to 2" deep area of concrete breakup with exposed reinforcing (see photo 62). Pier M There is a 9" high by 1'-0" long (full length) by 5" wide spall at the south end of the pedestal adjacent to the bearing for beam 1 in span 12.
REM.(2)7-96
14
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Item 60.2.b - Straddle Piers (Fair): Piers M, N, P, Q and R consist or reinforced concrete arched straddle pier caps integral with two columns. Portions of the straddle piers have been repaired. There are scattered areas of delaminated and spalled concrete on the straddle piers caps and columns (see sketches 12-16 and photos 63-65). Item 60.2.c - Hammerhead Piers (Fair): Piers C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, S, T and U are hammerhead piers. All of the hammerhead piers were retrofitted with external grouted post-tensioning tendons in 1991 due to the presence of structural shear cracks. These cracks started near the center of the upper portion of the cap and traveled down, diagonally to the base of the cantilevered portions of the pier caps. Galvanized steel plates form a protective cabinet which completely encloses the post-tensioning tendons and anchorages. Therefore, these elements are inaccessible for inspection. The galvanized steel plates which comprise the post-tensioning cabinet exhibit scattered areas of moderate rust. The post-tensioning repairs appear to be secure and in satisfactory condition. Portions of the hammerhead piers have been patched. The hammerhead piers typically exhibit random hairline cracks with efflorescence, rust stains and areas of hairline map cracks. There are scattered areas of delaminated concrete and spalling on the stem and the cantilevered portion of the caps throughout the hammerhead piers (see sketches 17-19 and photos 66 & 67). The following deficiencies on the hammerhead piers were noted: Pier C There is evidence of previous fire damage on the east face (charring and soot). Also, on the east face below the post-tensioning cabinet, there is a 22'-0" wide by 5" high by 4" deep spall/delamination. This spall extends to a height of 10" behind the post-tensioning cabinet (see photo 68). Pier G There is a 1'-0" diameter by 2 1/2" deep spall on the west face near the center of the cap and a 3'-0" wide by 1'-3" high by 1'-3" long by up to 7" deep edge spall with exposed reinforcing in the top of the pier below the median (see photo 69). Pier J There is a 5" wide by 1'-2" high by 1 1/2" deep spall with an adjacent 4" wide by 1'-7" high delamination on the west face of the cap beneath beam 7. On the underside of the south cantilever and the top of the stem, there is a 4 1/2" wide by 10" high by 2" deep edge spall with an adjacent 3" wide by 1'-4" high delamination on the west face. There is a 2'-0" wide by 10" high by 3/4" deep spall in the north face of the stem. Pier S There is an 11'-0" wide by 4'-6" high by 1" deep spall/delamination on the east face and a 13'-0" wide by 5'0" high delamination on the west face of the stem. There is a 5'-0" long by 4'-6" high delamination on the north face of the stem. The south face of the stem has a 3'-0" long by 3'-0" high delamination. Pier T There is a 2'-0" wide by 2'-0" high by 2" deep spall with exposed reinforcing and a 3'-9" long by 1'-4" high delamination on the west face of the north cantilever. Also, there is a 14'-0" wide by 6'-2" high by 1 1/2" deep spall/delamination on the west face of the stem near the base and a 15'-0" wide by 6'-0" high by 1 1/2" deep spall/delamination on the east face of the stem. There is a 1'-6" long by 1'-6" high by 3" deep spall with exposed reinforcing surrounded by delaminated concrete on the north face of the stem near the base. Pier U
REM.(2)7-96
15
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Item 60.2.c - Hammerhead Piers (Cont'd) There is a 3'-0" wide by 6'-0" high by 2" deep spall in the east face of the cap below the median located below the post-tensioning cabinet. Item 60.2.d - Pierwalls (Satisfactory): There are some hairline vertical cracks with rust stains and areas of adjacent delamination on the pierwalls at piers A and B. There is a 5'-0" wide by 2'-10" high by 3" deep spall with exposed reinforcing in the east face near the south end of the pierwall at pier B (see photo 70). Also at this location, there is a 7/16" wide crack in the top surface of the pierwall. There is a similar spall beneath beam 5. On the west face of the pierwall at pier B below beam 9, there is a full height by 1'-4" wide area of delamination. There is extensive debris accumulation adjacent to the both faces of pier A. Item 60.2.e - Cant. Beam Brackets (Fair): There are rolled steel beams (14WF246 or 14WF287) which cantilever beyond the pier caps to support the fascia girders. These cantilevered beam brackets are typically surrounded by a heavy build-up of sand and debris which covers the bottom flange and lower portions of the web, particularly in locations where the concrete pedestals completely surround the cantilever beam brackets. There is typically up to 1/4" section loss to the lower 6" of the web and up to 1/4" section loss by full width to the flanges throughout the length of the member. The cantilever beam brackets are fastened to the pier caps by six anchor bolts (1 1/2" diameter). These anchor bolts exhibit heavy rust delamination to the lower 6". The majority of the anchor bolts have a remaining diameter between 1 1/32" to 1 3/16". At three locations (both cantilever brackets at pier P in span 14 and the north cantilever bracket at pier M in span 13), the minimum remaining anchor bolt diameter is 7/8" (see photo 71). The lower 6" of the web stiffeners adjacent to the anchor bolts is typically reduced to a 7/16" remaining thickness, compared to the original thickness of 3/4". TRAFFIC SAFETY Item 36a - Bridge Railing (Satisfactory): There are three types of bridge railing on this structure. There is a steel pedestrian railing with pickets along each fascia. Atop the curbs at the sidewalks, there is a single steel pipe railing which is no longer exposed to traffic due to the installation of thrie beam guardrail. The thrie beam guardrail has Ibeam posts which have been bolted through the deck along both sides of the eastbound and westbound roadways. The thrie beam guardrail appears to meet the current standards. See Item 58.8 for additional comments. Item 36b - Transitions (Good): The east and west approach thrie beam guardrails have impact attenuators at the leading ends and boxing glove end treatments at the trailing ends. The raised concrete median extends onto the approach roadways. The transitions conform to the current standards.
REM.(2)7-96
16
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Item 36c - Approach Guardrail (Satisfactory): The approach guardrail consists of curb mounted single pipe railing which is continuous onto the bridge. There is no approach guardrail installed along the raised concrete median at both approaches. The approach pedestrian railing is a solid concrete barrier. The approach guardrail does not conform to the current standards. There are three out of the four anchor bolt nuts backed off along the south pipe railing at the fourth post from the east abutment. There is a 12'-0" long section of collision damage to the north pipe railing and curb at the west approach just west of the west abutment. At this location, the curb has a 1'-7" long by full height by 2 1/2" deep spall with two exposed anchor bolts and two broken anchor bolts (see photo 72). Item 36d - Approach Guardrail Ends (Good): Impact attenuators are in place at the leading end of the approach guardrail. There are boxing glove end treatments at the trailing end of each approach. These approach guardrail ends conform to the current standards. Sketch / Chart / Photo Log Sketch 1 : Framing plan (1 of 2). Sketch 2 : Framing plan (2 of 2). Sketch 3 : Typical cross section. Sketch 4 : Sidewalk stringers (1 of 2). Sketch 5 : Sidewalk and median stringers (2 of 2). Sketch 6 : Beam cross sections (1 of 3). Sketch 7 : Beam cross sections (2 of 3). Sketch 8 : Beam cross sections (3 of 3). Sketch 9 : Pier K pedestal - partial plan view. Sketch 10 : Pier Q pedestal - plan view. Sketch 11 : Pier S pedestal - plan view. Sketch 12 : Pier M elevations. Sketch 13 : Pier N elevations. Sketch 14 : Pier P elevations. Sketch 15 : Pier Q elevations. Sketch 16 : Pier R elevations. Sketch 17 : Pier D elevations. Sketch 18 : Pier K elevations. Sketch 19 : Pier L elevations. Chart 1 : Rocker bearing conditions (1 of 5). Chart 2 : Rocker bearing conditions (2 of 5). Chart 3 : Rocker bearing conditions (3 of 5). Chart 4 : Rocker bearing conditions (4 of 5). Chart 5 : Rocker bearing conditions (5 of 5). Photo 1 : General view of the north elevation of spans 13 through 15. Photo 2 : General view of the roadway looking east from span 13. Photo 3 : Up to 1 1/2" deep spall adjacent to bituminous patch in the wearing surface in the westbound roadway of span 18. Photo 4 : Full width by 4" long by 2" deep spall in the wearing surface adjacent to the deck joint at pier U in span 20 in the eastbound roadway. Photo 5 : A 7'-0" long by 2'-3" wide delamination of the wearing surface heaved up to 3 1/2" high in the eastbound roadway adjacent to the median in span 13.
REM.(2)7-96
17
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Sketch / Chart / Photo Log (Cont'd) Photo 6 : Photo 7 : Photo 8 : Photo 9 : Photo 10 : Photo 11 : Photo 12 : Photo 13 : Photo 14 : Photo 15 : Photo 16 : Photo 17 : Photo 18 : Photo 19 : Photo 20 : Photo 21 : Photo Photo Photo Photo 22 : 23 : 24 : 25 : A 3'-0" long by 1'-6" wide by 2" deep spall in the wearing surface with exposed welded wire mesh adjacent to the north curb in the westbound roadway of span 18. Areas of 100% loss to the stay-in-place forms, heavy scaling and efflorescence. Also, water leakage at the anchor bolts for the thrie beam guardrail posts. Concrete filled grid deck is not bearing on beam 3 over a 12'-0" length near pier M in span 12. A 1 3/4" gap between the top flange of beam 3 and the underside of the grid deck near pier M in span 12. Minor edge spalls and 3/4" gap between the top flange of the south fascia girder and the edge of the deck at pier M in span 12. Tree branches growing between the pickets of the north pedestrian railing in span 6. Cracked and missing plastic guardrail blocking due to collision damage along the south thrie beam guardrail of the eastbound roadway in span 16. Clogged drainage grate and dislodged section of joint seal at the median in the eastbound roadway at pier U in span 19. Moderate vegetation growth from the scupper at the north sidewalk at pier C in span 4. Disconnected drainpipe hanger at the west face of pier E. Completely detached lighting fixture which is only attached by heavily rusted light gauge wire at pier F in span 7. A 3'-0" high by 1" wide by 1/2" deep spall with exposed reinforcing near the base of the lighting standard in span 1. One of four anchor bolts missing at the base of the lighting standard on the median in span 10. Utility conduit sags 1'-0" over a 40' length due to broken clips at the east end of span 8. Up to 2 1/2" of vertical differential between the adjacent wearing surface and top of the deck joint at pier M in the eastbound roadway. Crack in the east joint armor near the north end of the deck joint at pier L in the eastbound roadway. Torn and dislodged joint seal for the full width of the north sidewalk at pier T. Vertical differential of up to 1 1/2" at the north sidewalk deck joint at pier N. Cracked and heaved asphaltic material adjacent to the joint seal at the median at pier A. A 1'-0" long by full width region of heavy map cracking with up to 2" settlement adjacent to the west abutment deck joint in the eastbound roadway of the west approach. A 10'-0" long by full width by up to 10" deep spall with exposed reinforcing and utility conduits at the median of the west approach at the second lighting standard west of the west abutment. Areas of 100% loss to the web of the south sidewalk stringer at pier F in span 7. Area of 100% loss to the web of the south sidewalk stringer at pier K in span 11. Areas of section loss to the flanges of the north median stringer at midspan in span 17. Heavy rust with minor section loss to the north face of the web of beam 2 at pier E in span 6. Heavy rust with minor section loss to the north face of the web of beam 2 at pier G in span 8. Heavy rust with minor section loss to the north flanges at midspan of beam 2 in span 5. Moderate collision damage to the south bottom flange at midspan of the north fascia girder in span 3 (above the Arborway turnaround roadway). North bottom flange bent downward 3" over a 2'-6" length at the eastern 1/3 point of the north fascia girder in span 5. Cracked weld for the keeper plate on the north side of the sole plate of beam 6 at pier T in span 19. Maximum lateral movement of 2" of the sole plate relative to the rocker bearing at beam 7 at pier T in span 19. Lateral movement of 5/8" of the sole plate relative to the rocker bearing at beams 4 and 5 at pier U in span 20.
Photo 26 : Photo Photo Photo Photo Photo Photo Photo 27 : 28 : 29 : 30 : 31 : 32 : 33 :
Photo 34 : Photo 35 : Photo 36 : Photo 37 :
REM.(2)7-96
18
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Sketch / Chart / Photo Log (Cont'd) Photo 38 : Photo 39 : Photo 40 : Photo 41 : Photo 42 : Photo 43 : Photo 44 : Photo 45 : Photo 46 : Photo 47 : Photo 48 : Photo 49 : Photo 50 : Photo 51 : Photo 52 : Photo 53 : Photo 54 : Photo 55 : Photo 56 : Photo 57 : Photo 58 : Photo 59 : Photo 60 : Photo 61 : Photo 62 : Photo 63 : Photo 64 : A 7/8" gap beneath the underside of the rocker and the masonry plate which exposes the pintels at beam 5 at pier R in span 17. A 7/8" gap by 7 1/2" wide beneath the underside of the rocker and the masonry plate which exposes a pintel at beam 3 at pier T in span 18. Gap beneath the top of the rocker bearing and the underside of the sole plate at beam 3 at pier A in span 1. Rocker bearing appears frozen in the over-expanded position by heavy rust delamination at beam 8 at pier J in span 10. North anchor bolt nut is backed off at the fixed bearing for beam 12 at pier B in span 3. A 1'-1" high hole in the web of the second north median diaphragm east of pier E in span 6. Areas of 100% loss to the entire bottom flange and the web is disconnected from the north median stringer at the third diaphragm west of pier L in span 12. Areas of 100% loss to the full length of the channel diaphragm between beams 1 and 2 at pier D in span 4. Areas of 100% loss to the web of the channel diaphragm between beams 1 and 2 at pier A in span 2. Areas of advanced section loss to the knee braces and the channel diaphragm at beam 8 at pier H in span 9. A 2 1/2" long crack at the base of the weld between the sole plate and the south bottom flange of beam 10 at pier R in span 16. Cracked welds at the end diaphragm connection at beam 7 at pier U in span 19. Lateral misalignment of 1 1/2" of the superstructure along the south fascia at pier U. Up to 1/8" wide full height vertical crack in the west abutment breastwall between beams 9 and 10. Two missing sections of granite header at the base of the northwest wingwall, located approximately 100' from the west abutment. A 3'-0" long by 2'-0" high by 3" deep spall in the concrete base of the northwest wingwall at the west abutment. Separation of 5/16" between the masonry facing at the northwest wingwall and the west abutment breastwall. Spall in the east face of the pedestal which exposes the anchor bolts at the bearing for beam 8 at pier K in span 10. Spall in the east face of the pedestal at the bearing for beam 7 at pier K in span 10. Masonry pad not formed properly resulting in undermining below the fixed bearing for beam 6 at pier Q in span 15. Minor undermining due to the spalling of the masonry pad below the fixed bearing for beam 2 at pier Q in span 15. A 3/4" wide crack in the top of the west side of the pedestal on the south side of the fixed bearing for beam 7 at pier S. Edge spalls and areas of delaminated concrete in the west face of the pedestal beneath the fixed bearings for beams 13 and 14 at pier S. Close-up view of up to 1'-2" deep spall with exposed reinforcing which undermines the east pedestal between beams 7 and 8 at pier D. Up to 2" deep area of concrete breakup with exposed reinforcing on the top of the east side of the pedestal between beams 7 and 8 at pier G. A 7'-0" wide by 5" high by 11" long edge spall with exposed reinforcing in the straddle portion of the cap at pier M. A 3/8" wide crack with adjacent delaminated area in the top of the cap on the west side between beams 5 and 6 at pier N.
REM.(2)7-96
19
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
REMARKS
Sketch / Chart / Photo Log (Cont'd) Photo 65 : Photo 66 : Photo 67 : Photo 68 : Photo 69 : Photo 70 : Photo 71 : Photo 72 : A 8'-6" wide by 2'-6" high by 1'-6" long edge spall with exposed reinforcing in the east face of the cap at pier R. A 6'-0" long by up to 6'-0" wide by 3 1/2" deep spall with exposed reinforcing at the north end of the cap at pier L. Random spalls with exposed reinforcing in the west face of pier T. A 4" deep spall which extends to a height of 10" within an area of delamination below the posttensioning cabinet on the east face of pier C. A 3'-0" wide by 1'-3" high by 1'-3" long by up to 7" deep edge spall with exposed reinforcing in the top of the pier on the west side below the median at pier G. A 5'-0" wide by 2'-10" high by 3" deep spall with exposed reinforcing in the east face at the south end of pier B. Remaining diameter of 7/8" for the anchor bolts at the north cantilever beam bracket at pier M in span 13. Spall with two exposed anchor bolts and two broken anchor bolts at the north guardrail at the west approach.
REM.(2)7-96
20
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 1:
Framing plan (1 of 2).
REM.(2)7-96
21
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 2:
Framing plan (2 of 2).
REM.(2)7-96
22
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 3:
Typical cross section.
REM.(2)7-96
23
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 4:
Sidewalk stringers (1 of 2).
REM.(2)7-96
24
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 5:
Sidewalk and median stringers (2 of 2).
REM.(2)7-96
25
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 6:
Beam cross sections (1 of 3).
REM.(2)7-96
26
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 7:
REM.(2)7-96
27
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 8:
REM.(2)7-96
28
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 9:
Pier K pedestal - partial plan view.
REM.(2)7-96
29
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 10:
Pier Q pedestal - plan view.
REM.(2)7-96
30
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 11:
Pier S pedestal - plan view.
REM.(2)7-96
31
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 12:
Pier M elevations.
REM.(2)7-96
32
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 13:
Pier N elevations.
REM.(2)7-96
33
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 14:
Pier P elevations.
REM.(2)7-96
34
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 15:
Pier Q elevations.
REM.(2)7-96
35
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 16:
Pier R elevations.
REM.(2)7-96
36
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 17:
Pier D elevations.
REM.(2)7-96
37
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 18:
Pier K elevations.
REM.(2)7-96
38
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
SKETCHES
Sketch 19:
Pier L elevations.
REM.(2)7-96
39
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
CHARTS
Chart 1:
Rocker bearing conditions (1 of 5).
REM.(2)7-96
40
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
CHARTS
Chart 2:
REM.(2)7-96
41
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
CHARTS
Chart 3:
REM.(2)7-96
42
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
CHARTS
Chart 4:
REM.(2)7-96
43
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
CHARTS
Chart 5:
REM.(2)7-96
44
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 1:
General view of the north elevation of spans 13 through 15.
Photo 2:
General view of the roadway looking east from span 13.
REM.(2)7-96
45
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 3:
Up to 1 1/2" deep spall adjacent to bituminous patch in the wearing surface in the westbound roadway of span 18.
Photo 4:
Full width by 4" long by 2" deep spall in the wearing surface adjacent to the deck joint at pier U in span 20 in the eastbound roadway.
REM.(2)7-96
46
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 5:
A 7'-0" long by 2'-3" wide delamination of the wearing surface heaved up to 3 1/2" high in the eastbound roadway adjacent to the median in span 13.
Photo 6:
A 3'-0" long by 1'-6" wide by 2" deep spall in the wearing surface with exposed welded wire mesh adjacent to the north curb in the westbound roadway of span 18.
REM.(2)7-96
47
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 7:
Areas of 100% loss to the stay-in-place forms, heavy scaling and efflorescence. Also, water leakage at the anchor bolts for the thrie beam guardrail posts.
Photo 8:
Concrete filled grid deck is not bearing on beam 3 over a 12'-0" length near pier M in span 12.
REM.(2)7-96
48
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 9:
A 1 3/4" gap between the top flange of beam 3 and the underside of the grid deck near pier M in span 12.
Photo 10:
Minor edge spalls and 3/4" gap between the top flange of the south fascia girder and the edge of the deck at pier M in span 12.
REM.(2)7-96
49
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 11:
Tree branches growing between the pickets of the north pedestrian railing in span 6.
Photo 12:
Cracked and missing plastic guardrail blocking due to collision damage along the south thrie beam guardrail of the eastbound roadway in span 16.
REM.(2)7-96
50
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 13:
Clogged drainage grate and dislodged section of joint seal at the median in the eastbound roadway at pier U in span 19.
Photo 14:
Moderate vegetation growth from the scupper at the north sidewalk at pier C in span 4.
REM.(2)7-96
51
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 15:
Disconnected drainpipe hanger at the west face of pier E.
Photo 16:
Completely detached lighting fixture which is only attached by heavily rusted light gauge wire at pier F in span 7.
REM.(2)7-96
52
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 17:
A 3'-0" high by 1" wide by 1/2" deep spall with exposed reinforcing near the base of the lighting standard in span 1.
Photo 18:
One of four anchor bolts missing at the base of the lighting standard on the median in span 10.
REM.(2)7-96
53
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 19:
Utility conduit sags 1'-0" over a 40' length due to broken clips at the east end of span 8.
Photo 20:
Up to 2 1/2" of vertical differential between the adjacent wearing surface and top of the deck joint at pier M in the eastbound roadway.
REM.(2)7-96
54
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 21:
Crack in the east joint armor near the north end of the deck joint at pier L in the eastbound roadway.
Photo 22:
Torn and dislodged joint seal for the full width of the north sidewalk at pier T.
REM.(2)7-96
55
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 23:
Vertical differential of up to 1 1/2" at the north sidewalk deck joint at pier N.
Photo 24:
Cracked and heaved asphaltic material adjacent to the joint seal at the median at pier A.
REM.(2)7-96
56
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 25:
A 1'-0" long by full width region of heavy map cracking with up to 2" settlement adjacent to the west abutment deck joint in the eastbound roadway of the west approach.
Photo 26:
A 10'-0" long by full width by up to 10" deep spall with exposed reinforcing and utility conduits at the median of the west approach at the second lighting standard west of the west abutment.
REM.(2)7-96
57
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 27:
Areas of 100% loss to the web of the south sidewalk stringer at pier F in span 7.
Photo 28:
Area of 100% loss to the web of the south sidewalk stringer at pier K in span 11.
REM.(2)7-96
58
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 29:
Areas of section loss to the flanges of the north median stringer at midspan in span 17.
Photo 30:
Heavy rust with minor section loss to the north face of the web of beam 2 at pier E in span 6.
REM.(2)7-96
59
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 31:
Heavy rust with minor section loss to the north face of the web of beam 2 at pier G in span 8.
Photo 32:
Heavy rust with minor section loss to the north flanges at midspan of beam 2 in span 5.
REM.(2)7-96
60
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 33:
Moderate collision damage to the south bottom flange at midspan of the north fascia girder in span 3 (above the Arborway turnaround roadway).
Photo 34:
North bottom flange bent downward 3" over a 2'-6" length at the eastern 1/3 point of the north fascia girder in span 5.
REM.(2)7-96
61
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 35:
Cracked weld for the keeper plate on the north side of the sole plate of beam 6 at pier T in span 19.
Photo 36:
Maximum lateral movement of 2" of the sole plate relative to the rocker bearing at beam 7 at pier T in span 19.
REM.(2)7-96
62
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 37:
Lateral movement of 5/8" of the sole plate relative to the rocker bearing at beams 4 and 5 at pier U in span 20.
Photo 38:
A 7/8" gap beneath the underside of the rocker and the masonry plate which exposes the pintels at beam 5 at pier R in span 17.
REM.(2)7-96
63
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 39:
A 7/8" gap by 7 1/2" wide beneath the underside of the rocker and the masonry plate which exposes a pintel at beam 3 at pier T in span 18.
Photo 40:
Gap beneath the top of the rocker bearing and the underside of the sole plate at beam 3 at pier A in span 1.
REM.(2)7-96
64
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 41:
Rocker bearing appears frozen in the over-expanded position by heavy rust delamination at beam 8 at pier J in span 10.
Photo 42:
North anchor bolt nut is backed off at the fixed bearing for beam 12 at pier B in span 3.
REM.(2)7-96
65
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 43:
A 1'-1" high hole in the web of the second north median diaphragm east of pier E in span 6.
Photo 44:
Areas of 100% loss to the entire bottom flange and the web is disconnected from the north median stringer at the third diaphragm west of pier L in span 12.
REM.(2)7-96
66
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 45:
Areas of 100% loss to the full length of the channel diaphragm between beams 1 and 2 at pier D in span 4.
Photo 46:
Areas of 100% loss to the web of the channel diaphragm between beams 1 and 2 at pier A in span 2.
REM.(2)7-96
67
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 47:
Areas of advanced section loss to the knee braces and the channel diaphragm at beam 8 at pier H in span 9.
Photo 48:
A 2 1/2" long crack at the base of the weld between the sole plate and the south bottom flange of beam 10 at pier R in span 16.
REM.(2)7-96
68
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 49:
Cracked welds at the end diaphragm connection at beam 7 at pier U in span 19.
Photo 50:
Lateral misalignment of 1 1/2" of the superstructure along the south fascia at pier U.
REM.(2)7-96
69
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 51:
Up to 1/8" wide full height vertical crack in the west abutment breastwall between beams 9 and 10.
Photo 52:
Two missing sections of granite header at the base of the northwest wingwall, located approximately 100' from the west abutment.
REM.(2)7-96
70
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 53:
A 3'-0" long by 2'-0" high by 3" deep spall in the concrete base of the northwest wingwall at the west abutment.
Photo 54:
Separation of 5/16" between the masonry facing at the northwest wingwall and the west abutment breastwall.
REM.(2)7-96
71
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 55:
Spall in the east face of the pedestal which exposes the anchor bolts at the bearing for beam 8 at pier K in span 10.
Photo 56:
Spall in the east face of the pedestal at the bearing for beam 7 at pier K in span 10.
REM.(2)7-96
72
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 57:
Masonry pad not formed properly resulting in undermining below the fixed bearing for beam 6 at pier Q in span 15.
Photo 58:
Minor undermining due to the spalling of the masonry pad below the fixed bearing for beam 2 at pier Q in span 15.
REM.(2)7-96
73
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 59:
A 3/4" wide crack in the top of the west side of the pedestal on the south side of the fixed bearing for beam 7 at pier S.
Photo 60:
Edge spalls and areas of delaminated concrete in the west face of the pedestal beneath the fixed bearings for beams 13 and 14 at pier S.
REM.(2)7-96
74
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 61:
Close-up view of up to 1'-2" deep spall with exposed reinforcing which undermines the east pedestal between beams 7 and 8 at pier D.
Photo 62:
Up to 2" deep area of concrete breakup with exposed reinforcing on the top of the east side of the pedestal between beams 7 and 8 at pier G.
REM.(2)7-96
75
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 63:
A 7'-0" wide by 5" high by 11" long edge spall with exposed reinforcing in the straddle portion of the cap at pier M.
Photo 64:
A 3/8" wide crack with adjacent delaminated area in the top of the cap on the west side between beams 5 and 6 at pier N.
REM.(2)7-96
76
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 65:
A 8'-6" wide by 2'-6" high by 1'-6" long edge spall with exposed reinforcing in the east face of the cap at pier R.
Photo 66:
A 6'-0" long by up to 6'-0" wide by 3 1/2" deep spall with exposed reinforcing at the north end of the cap at pier L.
REM.(2)7-96
77
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 67:
Random spalls with exposed reinforcing in the west face of pier T.
Photo 68:
A 4" deep spall which extends to a height of 10" within an area of delamination below the post-tensioning cabinet on the east face of pier C.
REM.(2)7-96
78
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 69:
A 3'-0" wide by 1'-3" high by 1'-3" long by up to 7" deep edge spall with exposed reinforcing in the top of the pier on the west side below the median at pier G.
Photo 70:
A 5'-0" wide by 2'-10" high by 3" deep spall with exposed reinforcing in the east face at the south end of pier B.
REM.(2)7-96
79
OF
79
INSPECTION DATE
BOSTON
4EX
B-16-367
B16367-4EX-DOT-NBI
JAN 16, 2012
PHOTOS
Photo 71:
Remaining diameter of 7/8" for the anchor bolts at the north cantilever beam bracket at pier M in span 13.
Photo 72:
Spall with two exposed anchor bolts and two broken anchor bolts at the north guardrail at the west approach.
REM.(2)7-96

Casey Inspection Report

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Casey Inspection Report

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

STRUCTURES INSPECTION FIELD REPORT

BR. DEPT. NO.

JAN 16, 2012 2011

106-YR REBUILT YR REHAB'D (NON 106)

047 CASEY OVERPASS

DIST. BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER

COMB WASH ST&AMTK&ORNG

302 : Steel Stringer/Girder

State Highway State Highway Agency Agency

N 5 5 4 M-P M-P S-A S-A M-P

g. Pointing h. Footings i. Piles j. Scour k. Settlement

e. Cant. Beam Brackets

14. Paint/Coating 15.

M-P M-P M-P

c. Appr. Sidewalk Settlement

COLLISION DAMAGE: Please explain None ( ) Minor ( ) Moderate ( X ) Severe (

If YES please explain

Any Fracture Critical Member: (Y/N)

I-60 (This Report):

93B-U/W (DIVE) Insp

N=NOT APPLICABLE H=HIDDEN/INACCESSIBLE

PAGE CITY/TOWN B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO. 8.-STRUCTURE NO.

JAN 16, 2012

ITEM 36 TRAFFIC SAFETY

D. Approach Guardrail Ends

Actual Field Measurement

ITEM 61 (Dive Report):

ITEM 61 (This Report)

93b-U/W INSP. DATE:

Signs In Place (Y=Yes,N=No, NR=NotRequired) Legibility/ Visibility

List of field tests performed:

If YES please give priority:

Request for Rating or Rerating (Y/N):

CONDITION RATING GUIDE

(For Items 58, 59, 60 and 61)

No problem noted. Some minor problems.

Out of service - beyond corrective action.

DEFICIENCY REPORTING GUIDE

MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

STRUCTURES INSPECTION FIELD REPORT

BR. DEPT. NO.

Jan 16, 2012

Jan 16, 2012 2011

106-YR REBUILT *YR REHAB'D (NON 106)

047 CASEY OVERPASS

DIST. BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER

COMB WASH ST&AMTK&ORNG

302 : Steel Stringer/Girder

Request for Rating or Rerating (Y/N): Date:

If YES please give priority:

INV. RATING OF MEMBER FROM RATING H-20 3 3S2

Item 59.13 - Member

Item 60.2.a Pedestals

List of field tests performed:

(Overall Previous Condition)

(Overall Current Condition)

C-S= Critical Structural Deficiency C-H= Critical Hazard Deficiency -

PAGE CITY/TOWN B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO. 8.-STRUCTURE NO.

JAN 16, 2012

PAGE CITY/TOWN B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO. 8.-STRUCTURE NO.

JAN 16, 2012

PAGE CITY/TOWN B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO. 8.-STRUCTURE NO.