0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
16 просмотров5 страниц
Debtors agree to extend "challenge period" set forth in section (b)(i) of paragraph 12 of the Final Order. "Debtors" and "yucaipa" agree to abide by the terms of the Stipulation. The debtors in the above-captioned cases (collectively, the "Debtors") are requesting an extension of the Challenge period.
Debtors agree to extend "challenge period" set forth in section (b)(i) of paragraph 12 of the Final Order. "Debtors" and "yucaipa" agree to abide by the terms of the Stipulation. The debtors in the above-captioned cases (collectively, the "Debtors") are requesting an extension of the Challenge period.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Debtors agree to extend "challenge period" set forth in section (b)(i) of paragraph 12 of the Final Order. "Debtors" and "yucaipa" agree to abide by the terms of the Stipulation. The debtors in the above-captioned cases (collectively, the "Debtors") are requesting an extension of the Challenge period.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ALLIED SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC., eta/., 1 ) Chapter II ) ) Case No. 12-11564 (CSS) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) ) Related Docket No. 230 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF THE CREDITORS' COMMITTEE'S CHALLENGE PERIOD The debtors in the above-captioned cases (collectively, the "Debtors"), Yucaipa American Alliance Fund II, LLC (together with its affiliated funds, "Yucaipa"), as agent and a lender under the Senior Secured Super-Priority Debtor in Possession Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated as of June 11,2012, and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in the above-captioned cases (the "Committee," and collectively with the Debtors and Yucaipa, the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree as follows (the "Stipulation"): I. The Parties agree to extend the "Challenge Period" set forth in section (b)(i) of paragraph 12 of the Final Order Pursuant to II US. C. I05, 36I, 362. 363(c), 364(c)(I), 364(c)(2), 364(c)(3), 364(e), 503(b) and 507(a), Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2002, 400I and 9014 and Del. Bankr. L.R. 400I-2: (I) Authorizing Debtors to (A) Obtain Postpetilion Secured DIP Financing And (B) Use Cash Collateral; (II) Granting Superpriority Liens and Providing for Superpriority Administrative Expense Status; (III) Granting Adequate Protection to Pre petition Secured The debtors in the above-captioned cases (collectively, the "Debtors"), along with the federal tax identification number (or Canadian business number where applicable) for each of the Debtors, are: Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. (58-0360550); Allied Automotive Group, Inc. (58-2201081); Allied Freight Broker LLC (59- 2876864); Allied Systems (Canada) Company (90-0169283); Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.) (58-1710028); Axis Areta, LLC (45-5215545); Axis Canada Company (87568828); Axis Group, Inc. (58-2204628); Commercial Carriers, Inc. (38-0436930); CT Services, Inc. (38-2918187); Cardin Transport LLC (38-1985795); F.J. Boutell Driveaway LLC (38-0365100); GACS Incorporated (58-1944786); Logistic Systems, LLC (45-4241751); Logistic Technology, LLC (45-4242057); QAT, Inc. (59-2876863); RMX LLC (31-0961359); Transport Support LLC (38-2349563); and Terminal Services LLC (91-0847582). The location of the Debtors' corporate headquarters and the Debtors' address for service of process is 2302 Parklake Drive, Bldg. 15, Ste. 600, Atlanta, Georgia 30345. Lenders; And (IV) ModifYing Automatic Stay (D.l. 230) (the "DIP Order"), 2 solely with respect to the Committee, by modifYing the words "the later to occur of {A) seventy-five (75) days after the Consent Date and {B) sixty (60) days after the formation of the Committee" to "the later to occur of (A) one hundred and five (I 05) days after the Consent Date and (B) ninety (90) days after the formation of the Committee". 2. Nothing contained herein shall act to waive or prejudice either: (a) the Committee's right to seek such other and further extensions as it deems necessary and appropriate; or (b) the right of any other party to this Stipulation to object to the Committee's request(s) for such an extension. 3. Except as expressly set forth herein or in any other applicable order of this Court, the Parties agree that this Stipulation does not otherwise affect any term or provision of the DIP Order, and that the DIP Order otherwise remains in full force and effect. For avoidance of doubt, nothing herein limits the Committee's rights to bring a Challenge Action for any reason other than the perfection of any lien. 4. This Stipulation may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same document. Signatures transmitted by facsimile or other electronic transmission shall be sufficient to constitute execution by the parties hereto. 5. This Stipulation contains the entire agreement between the Parties as to the subject matter hereof, and all understandings, agreements and communications prior to the date hereof, whether express or implied, oral or written, relating to the subject matter hereof are fully and completely extinguished and superseded by this Stipulation. This Stipulation shall not be 2 Capitalized tenns used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the DIP Order. 2 altered, amended, modified or otherwise changed, and the rights hereunder may not be waived, except by a writing dated subsequent to the date hereof and duly signed by each of the Parties. 6. This Stipulation is effective upon filing without further order of Court and shall not be modified, altered, amended or vacated without written consent of all parties hereto, subject to Court approval. 7. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over all matters arising from or related to the interpretation or implementation of this Stipulation. AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY: Date: 2012 Wilmington, Delaware SULLIVAN HAZELTINE ALLINSON LLC
William D. Sullivan (No. 2820) William A. Hazeltine (No. 3294) Seth S. Brostoff (No. 5312) 901 North Market Street, Suite 1300 Wilmington, DE 19801 Tel: (302) 428-8191 Fax: (302) 428-8195 and SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Michael G. Burke Brian J. Lohan Dennis Kao 787 Seventh A venue New York, NY 10019 Tel: (212) 839-5300 Fax: (212) 839-5599 Matthew A. Clemente One South Dearborn Street Chicago, IL 60603 Tel: (312) 853-7000 Fax: (312) 853-7036 Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors 3 Date: August') l, 2012 Wilmington, Delaware YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP -,______- ~ d Michael R. Nestor (No. 3526) Joseph M. Barry (No. 4221) Rodney Square 1000 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Tel: (302) 571-6600 Fax: (302) 571-1253 and LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Robert A. Klyman (admitted pro hac vice) Gregory 0. Lunt (admitted pro hac vice) 355 South Grant Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 Tel: (213) 485-1234 Fax: (213) 891-8763 Counsel for Yucaipa American Alliance Fund II, LLC and its affiliated funds 4 Date: 2012 Wilmington, Delaware Rlf!JA,P.DS, !fA YTON P.A. -""('----_ -=-- ---::_:7. ____ .: __ _ -. " -5- --, __ --, Mark D. jiol!ins {No. 1'9f!) -- <::. Christopher M. Samis (No. 4909) Andrew C. Irgens (No. 5193) Marisa A. Terranova (No. 5396) One Rodney Square 920 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Tel: (302) 65!-7700 Fax: (302) 651-770 I and TROUTMANSANDERSLLP Jeffrey W. Kelley (admitted pro hac vice) Ezra H. Cohen (admitted pro hac vice) Carolyn P. Richter (admitted pro hac vice) Matthew R. Brooks (admitted pro hac vice) Benjamin R. Carlsen (admitted pro hac vice) Bank of America Plaza 600 Peachtree Street, Suite 5200 Atlanta, GA 30308-2216 Tel: (404) 885-3000 Fax: (404) 885-3900 Counselfi;r the Debtors JT IS APPROVED AND SO ORDERED_
Dated: 20 12 Wilmington, Delaware UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE 5
Assured of Payment, (B) Prohibiting Utilities From Altering, Refusing, or Discontinuing Services, and (C) Establishing Procedures For Resolving Requests For Additional Assurance
Authorizing Payment of Prepetition Wages, Payroll Taxes, Certain Employee Benefits and Related Expenses, and Other Compensation To Employees and Independent Contractors
Is Bad-Faith the New Wilful Blindness?: The Company Directors’ Duty of Good Faith and Wilful Blindness Doctrine Under Common Law Usa (Delaware) and Uk (England): a Comparative Study