Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=burning+of+the+books&go=Go
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burning_of_books_and_burying_of_scholars
Burning of the books and burying of the scholars (traditional Chinese: ; simplified
Chinese: ; pinyin: Fnsh Kngr) is a phrase that refers to a purported policy and a
sequence of events in the Qin Dynasty of Ancient China, between the period of 213 and 206 BC.
During these events, the Hundred Schools of Thought were pruned;legalism survived. One side effect
was the marginalization of the thoughts of the school of Mozi and the survival of the thoughts
of Confucius.
It is important to note, however, that few scholars today believe that Sima Qian's account of the bookburning in the Records of the Grand Historianthe source of our knowledge about this eventreflects
what actually happened.[1]
Contents
[hide]
1 Book burning
2 Burial of the scholars
3 See also
4 References
5 External links
[edit]Book burning
According to the Records of the Grand Historian, after Qin Shi Huangdi, the first emperor of China,
unified China in 221 BC, his chancellor Li Si suggested suppressing the intellectual discourse to unify
all thoughts and political opinions. This was justified by accusations that the intelligentsia sang false
praise and raised dissent through libel.
Beginning in 213 BC, all classic works of the Hundred Schools of Thoughtexcept those from Li Si's
own school of philosophy known as legalismwere subject to book burning.
Qin Shi Huangdi burned the other histories out of fear that they undermined his legitimacy, and wrote
his own history books. Afterwards, Li Si took his place in this area.
Li Si proposed that all histories in the imperial archives except those written by the Qin historians be
burned; that the Classic of Poetry, the Classic of History, and works by scholars of different schools be
handed in to the local authorities for burning; that anyone discussing these two particular books be
executed; that those using ancient examples to satirize contemporary politics be put to death, along
with their families; that authorities who failed to report cases that came to their attention were equally
guilty; and that those who had not burned the listed books within 30 days of the decree were to be
banished to the north as convicts working on building the Great Wall. The only books to be spared in
the destruction were books on war, medicine, agriculture and divination.[2]
[edit]Burial of the scholars
After being deceived by two alchemists while seeking prolonged life, Qin Shi Huangdi ordered more
than 460 scholars in the capital to be buried alive in the second year of the proscription, though an
account given by Wei Hong in the 2nd century added another 700 to the figure. As some of them were
also Confucian scholars, Fusu counselled that, with the country newly unified, and enemies still not
pacified, such a harsh measure imposed on those who respect Confucius would cause
instability.[3] However, he was unable to change his father's mind, and instead was sent to guard the
frontier in a de facto exile.
The quick fall of the Qin Dynasty was attributed to this proscription. Confucianism was revived in
the Han Dynasty that followed, and became the official ideology of the Chinese imperial state. Many
of the other schools had disappeared
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_burning
Book burning (also biblioclasm or libricide) is the practice of destroying,
often ceremoniously, books or other written material. In modern times, other forms of media, such
as phonograph records, video tapes, and CDs have also been ceremoniously burned or shredded. Book
burning is usually carried out in public, and is generally motivated by moral, religious,
or political objections to the material.
Book burning can be emblematic of a harsh and oppressive regime which is seeking to censor or
silence an aspect of a nation's culture. In some cases the works destroyed are irreplaceable and their
burning constitutes a severe loss to cultural heritage. Examples include obliteration of the Library of
Baghdad, the burning of books and burying of scholars under China's Qin Dynasty, the destruction
of Aztec codices by Itzcoatl, and the Nazi book burnings.
Book burning can be an act of contempt for the book's contents or author, and the act is intended to
draw wider public attention to this opinion. Examples include the destruction of the Sarajevo National
Library, the burning of Wilhelm Reich's books by the FBI, the 2010 Qur'an-burning controversy, and
the burning of Beatles records after a remark from John Lennon concerning Jesus Christ.
Contents
[hide]
1 Historical background
2 Notable book burnings
3 Burnings by authors
4 Books saved from burning
5 Burning for other reasons
6 In literature
7 Film and television
8 See also
9 References
10 External links
[edit]Historical background
From the 7th Century BC when Jehoiakim,King of Judah, burned part of the prophet Jeremiah's scroll,
(Jeremiah 36), to the present day, the burning of books has a long history as a tool wielded by
authorities both secular and religious, in efforts to suppress dissentingor heretical views that are
perceived as posing a threat to the prevailing order.
According to scholar Elaine Pagels, "In AD 367, Athanasius, the zealous bishop of Alexandria... issued
an Easter letter in which he demanded that Egyptian monks destroy all such unacceptable writings,
except for those he specifically listed as 'acceptable' even 'canonical' a list that constitutes the
present 'New Testament'".[citation needed] Although Pagels cites Athanasius's Paschal letter (letter 39)
for 367 AD, there is no order for monks to destroy heretical works contained in that letter.[1] Thus,
heretical texts do not turn up as palimpsests, washed clean and overwritten, as pagan ones do; many
early Christian texts have been as thoroughly "lost" as if they had been publicly burnt.
According to the Chronicle of Fredegar, Recared, King of the Wisigoths (reigned 586601) and first
Catholic king of Spain, following his conversion to Catholicism in 587, ordered that all Arian books
2
should be collected and burned; and all the books of Arian theology were reduced to ashes, with the
house in which they had been purposely collected.[2][3]
Nalanda, an ancient center of higher learning in Bihar, India was sacked by Turkic Muslim invaders
under Bakhtiyar Khalji in 1193. The great library of Nalanda University was so vast that it is reported
to have burned for three months after the invaders set fire to it, sacked and destroyed the monasteries,
and drove the monks from the site.[citation needed]
In his 1821 play, Almansor, the German writer Heinrich Heine referring to the burning of
the Muslim holy book, the Qur'an, during the Spanish Inquisition wrote, "Where they burn books,
so too will they in the end burn human beings." ("Dort, wo man Bcher verbrennt, verbrennt man auch
am Ende Menschen.")[citation needed] Over a century later, Heine's own books were among the
thousands of volumes that were torched by the Nazis in Berlin's Opernplatz.[citation needed]
In Azerbaijan, when a modified Latin alphabet was adopted, books published in Arabic script were
burned, especially in the late 1920s and 1930s.[4] The texts were not limited to the Quran; medical and
historical manuscripts were also destroyed.[5]
Book burning following the 1973 coup that installed the Pinochet regime in Chile
burn any book or written text which is inconvenient to the regime, and there is mention of "the total
destruction of all books published before 1960".[citation needed]
The advent of the digital age has resulted in an immense collection of written work being catalogued
exclusively or primarily in digital form. The intentional deletion or removal of these works has been
often referred to as a new form of book burning.[citation needed]
Some supporters have celebrated book burning cases in art and other media. Such is the bas-relief
by Giovanni Battista Maini of The Burning of Heretical Books over a side door on the faade of Santa
Maria Maggiore, Rome, which depicts the burning of 'heretical' books as a triumph of
righteousness.[7]
[edit]Notable book burnings
Main article: List of book burning incidents
[edit]Burnings by authors
In 1588, the exiled English Catholic William Cardinal Allen wrote "An Admonition to the Nobility
and People of England", a work sharply attacking Queen Elizabeth I. It was to be published in Spanishoccupied England in the event of the Spanish Armada succeeding in its invasion. Upon the defeat of
the Armada, Allen carefully consigned his publication to the fire, and we only know of it through one
of Elizabeth's spies, who had stolen a copy.[8]
The Hassidic Rabbi Nachman of Breslov is reported to have written a book which he himself burned in
1808. To this day, his followers mourn "The Burned Book" and seek in their Rabbi's surviving writings
for clues as to what the lost volume contained and why it was destroyed.[9]
Carlo Goldoni is known to have burned his first play, a tragedy called Amalasunta, when encountering
unfavorable criticism.
Joe Shuster, who together with Jerry Siegel created the fictional superhero Superman, in 1938 burned
the first Superman story when under the impression that it would not find a publisher.[citation needed]
[edit]Books saved from burning
Symbol of the "New York Society for the Suppression of Vice", advocating book-burning
When Virgil died, he left instructions that his manuscript of the Aeneid was to be burnt, as it was a
draft version with uncorrected faults and not a final version for release. However, this instruction was
ignored.
Before his death, Franz Kafka wrote to his friend and literary executor Max Brod: "Dearest Max, my
last request: Everything I leave behind me... in the way of diaries, manuscripts, letters (my own and
others'), sketches, and so on, [is] to be burned unread."[10] Brod overrode Kafka's wishes, believing
4
that Kafka had given these directions to him, specifically, because Kafka knew he would not honour
them Brod had told him as much. Had Brod carried out Kafka's instructions, virtually the whole of
Kafka's work except for a few short stories published in his lifetime would have been lost forever.
Most critics, at the time and up to the present, justify Brod's decision.
A similar case concerns the noted American poet Emily Dickinson, who died in 1890 and left to her
sister Lavinia the instruction of burning all her papers. Lavinia Dickinson did burn almost all of her
sister's correspondences, but interpreted the will as not including the forty notebooks and loose sheets,
all filled with almost 1800 poems; these Lavinia saved and began to publish the poems that year. Had
Lavinia Dickinson been more strict in carrying out her sister's will, all but a small handful of Emily
Dickinson's poetic work would have been lost.[11][12]
At the beginning of the Battle of Monte Cassino in the Second World War, two German officers
Viennese-born Lt.Col. Julius Schlegel (a Roman Catholic), and Captain Maximilian Becker (a
Protestant) had the foresight to transfer the Monte Cassino archives to the Vatican. Otherwise the
archives containing a vast number of documents relating to the 1500-years' history of the Abbey as
well as some 1400 irreplaceable manuscript codices, chiefly patristic and historical would have been
destroyed in the Allied air bombing which almost completely destroyed the Abbey shortly afterwards.
Also saved by the two officers' prompt action were the collections of the Keats-Shelley Memorial
House in Rome which had been sent to the Abbey for safety in December 1942.
[edit]Burning for other reasons
In the Sikh religion, any copies of the Guru Granth Sahib which are too badly damaged to be used, and
any printer's waste which bears any of its text, are cremated. Such a cremation is called Agan Bhet, and
is a similar to that performed when cremating a deceased Sikh.[13][14][15][16]
[edit]In literature
A much-quoted line in Mikhail Bulgakov's The Master and Margarita is "manuscripts don't burn"
(Russian: ). "The Master", a major protagonist in the book, is a writer who is
plagued by both his own mental problems and the oppression of Stalin's regime in 1930s Moscow. He
burns his treasured manuscript in an effort to hide it from the Soviet authorities and cleanse his own
mind from the troubles the work has brought him. The character Woland (a mysterious magician who
is in fact Satan) later gives the manuscript back to him, saying, "Didn't you know that manuscripts
don't burn?" There is an autobiographical element reflected in the Master's character here, as Bulgakov
in fact burned an early copy of The Master and Margarita for much the same reasons.
The first part of Don Quixote has a scene in which the priest and the housekeeper of the eponymous
knight go through the chivalry books that have turned him mad. In a kind ofauto de fe, they burn most
of them. The comments of the priest express the literary tastes of the author, though he offers some
sharp criticisms of Cervantes's works as well. It is notable that he saves Tirant lo Blanc.
At the conclusion of the novel "Auto da Fe" by Nobel-Prize winner Elias Canetti, the bibliophile
protagonist immolates himself on a pile of his own library.
The Japanese novel Toshokan Sensou is about the conflict between two military organizations after the
Japanese government passed a law that allows the censorship of any media deemed to be potentially
harmful to Japanese society, including book burning.
The short story "Earth's Holocaust" from Nathaniel Hawthorne's Mosses from an Old Manse, is about a
society that burns everything that it finds offensive, including its literature. Special attention is paid to
The Bible as the last book burned:
"Upon the blazing heap of falsehood and worn-out truth--things that the earth had never needed, or had
ceased to need, or had grown childishly weary of--fell the ponderous church Bible, the great old
volume that had lain so long on the cushion of the pulpit, and whence the pastor's solemn voice had
given holy utterance on so many a Sabbath day."
In Part II of the play Tamburlaine, by Christopher Marlowe, Tamburlaine (the protagonist) burns a
copy of the Qur'an after having conquered Asia Minor and Egypt. His book-burning and declaration of
independence from any deity leads to his fatal illness, and subsequently the end of the play.
In Anne of Green Gables, Anne watches in horror as her caretaker burns her book containing the poem
"Lady of Shallot" as punishment for reading instead of doing her chores.
Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 is a dystopian novel where books are outlawed and it is the job of a
"fireman" to burn them. In the introduction of the 1967 Simon and Schusterbook club edition,
Bradbury implies that the Nazi book burnings drove him to write the short story "The Fireman" which
was the precursor along with the foundation for his novelFahrenheit 451, stating, "It follows then that
when Hitler burned a book I felt it as keenly, please forgive me, as his killing a human, for in the long
sum of history they are one and the same flesh."[citation needed]
At the conclusion of Umberto Eco's "The Name of the Rose", the unique Medieval library which is at
the center of the book's plot is burned and totally destroyed.
A central event in the fantasy novel Titus Groan is the burning of the library of Earl Sepulchrave,
which was the earl's sole pleasure in life - leading to his madness and eventual death.
Iain Pears's book The Dream of Scipio is set in Provence, with the lives of three people at various
historical periods interweaving with each other. Each of these lives includes an incident of book
burning with a crucial importance. Manlius Hippomanes, a gallic aristocrat living in the time of
the collapse of the Roman Empire in the fifth century, makes cynical use of Christianity for personal
power and instills religious intolerance and antisemitism in his followers - and after his death, these
followers set up a bonfire and burn Hippomanes' entire library of Classical works, believing
themselves to be honoring his precepts. Olivier de Noyen, a poet and scholar active in the 14th
Century Papal Court atAvignon, had to watch his father burning his beloved copy of Cicero - but then
de Noyen re-wrote it from memory, and the incident determined him to devote his life to finding and
preserving the books of antiquity. Julien Barneuve, an intellectual active during the Second World
War, realizes the disastrous results of his collaboration with the pro-Nazi Vichy government and burns
himself to death in a hut - starting the fire by burning his own manuscript of a work praising
Hippomanes and condemning de Noyen.
In the future depicted in Brian Stableford's "The Halcyon Drift", one of the leading planets in the
Galaxy is "New Alexandria", whose inhabitants are dedicated to the preservation and extension of
knowledge, and are brought up to regard the destruction of books as the most heinous of deeds.
Nevertheless, a protagonist agrees to help the Khor-Monsa, an alien species, in destroying books and
records of their remote ancestors which were found in a drifting spaceshipsince the books contained
a shameful secret whose publication might have led to the present Khor-Monsa losing their social
status and becoming targets of discrimination.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_book_burnings
The Nazi book burnings were a campaign conducted by the authorities of Nazi Germany to
ceremonially burn books in Germany bypacifist, socialist, Jewish, and other authors whose ideologies
were seen to be subversive to the National Socialist administration.
Contents
[hide]
1 The book-burning campaign
2 Denazification
3 Depictions in film
4 See also
5 Bibliography
6 List of authors whose books were burnt
7 Notes
8 External links
[edit]The book-burning campaign
On April 6th, 1933, the Main Office for Press and Propaganda of the German Student
Association proclaimed a nationwide "Action against the Un-German Spirit", which was to climax in a
literary purge or "cleansing" ("Suberung") by fire. Local chapters were to supply the press with
releases and commissioned articles, sponsor well-known Nazi figures to speak at public gatherings,
and negotiate for radio broadcast time. On 8 April, the students association also drafted the Twelve
Theses which deliberately evoked Martin Luther and the historic burning of "Un-German" books at
the Wartburg festival on the 300th anniversary of the posting of Luther's Ninety-Five Theses. The
theses called for a "pure" national language and culture. Placards publicized the theses, which attacked
"Jewish intellectualism", asserted the need to "purify" German language and literature, and demanded
that universities be centres of German nationalism. The students described the "action" as a response to
a worldwide Jewish "smear campaign" against Germany and an affirmation of traditional German
values.
In a symbolic act of ominous significance, on 10 May 1933, the students burned upwards of 25,000
volumes of "un-German" books, presaging an era of state censorship and control of culture. On the
night of 10 May, in most university towns, nationalist students marched in torchlight parades "against
the un-German spirit." The scripted rituals called for high Nazi officials, professors, rectors, and
student leaders to address the participants and spectators. At the meeting places, students threw the
pillaged and unwanted books into the bonfires with great joyous ceremony, band-playing, songs, "fire
oaths," and incantations. In Berlin, some 40,000 people gathered in the Opernplatz to hear Joseph
Goebbels deliver a fiery address: "No to decadence and moral corruption!" Goebbels enjoined the
crowd. Yes to decency and morality in family and state! I consign to the flames the writings
ofHeinrich Mann, Ernst Glser, Erich Kstner.
The era of extreme Jewish intellectualism is now at an end. The breakthrough of the German
revolution has again cleared the way on the German path...The future German man will not just be a
man of books, but a man of character. It is to this end that we want to educate you. As a young person,
to already have the courage to face the pitiless glare, to overcome the fear of death, and to regain
respect for death - this is the task of this young generation. And thus you do well in this midnight hour
to commit to the flames the evil spirit of the past. This is a strong, great and symbolic deed - a deed
7
which should document the following for the world to know - Here the intellectual foundation of
the November Republic is sinking to the ground, but from this wreckage the phoenix of a new spirit
will triumphantly rise.
Joseph Goebbels , Speech to the students in Berlin
Memorial for book burning in 1933; in the ground of Rmerberg Square in front ofFrankfurt city
hall, Hesse, Germany.
Not all book burnings took place on 10 May as the German Student Association had planned. Some
were postponed a few days because of rain. Others, based on local chapter preference, took place on 21
June, the summer solstice, a traditional date of celebration. Nonetheless, in 34 university towns across
Germany the "Action against the Un-German Spirit" was a success, enlisting widespread newspaper
coverage.[citation needed] And in some places, notably Berlin, radio broadcasts brought the speeches,
songs, and ceremonial incantations "live" to countless German listeners.
Among the authors whose books student leaders burned that night numbered well-known socialists
such as Bertolt Brecht and August Bebel; the founder of the concept of communism, Karl Marx;
critical bourgeois writers like the Austrian playwright Arthur Schnitzler, and corrupting foreign
influences, among them American authors Ernest Hemingway, Jack London and Helen Keller,
English writer H. G. Wells; and notable Jewish authors such as Franz Werfel, Max Brod, and Stefan
Zweig. Especially notable among those works burned were the writings of beloved nineteenth-century
German-Jewish poet Heinrich Heine, who wrote in his 1820-1821 play Almansor the famous
admonition, Dort, wo man Bcher verbrennt, verbrennt man am Ende auch Menschen": "Where they
burn books, they will in the end also burn people."
[edit]Denazification
Main articles: Censorship in the Federal Republic of Germany, Allied Occupation Zones in Germany,
and Denazification
In 1946, the Allied occupation authorities drew up a list of over 30,000 titles, ranging from school
books to poetry and including works by such authors as von Clausewitz. Millions of copies of these
books were confiscated and destroyed. The representative of the Military Directorate admitted that the
order in principle was no different from the Nazi book burnings.[1]
Artworks were under the same censorship as other media;
"all collections of works of art related or dedicated to the perpetuation of German militarism or Nazism
will be closed permanently and taken into custody.".
The directives were very broadly interpreted, leading to the destruction of thousands of paintings and
thousands more were shipped to deposits in the U.S. Those confiscated paintings still surviving in U.S.
custody include, for example, a painting "depicting a couple of middle aged women talking in a sunlit
street in a small town".[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_book-burning_incidents
Contents
[hide]
1 Antiquity
1.1 Library of Ashurbanipal (by Babylonians, Scythians and Medes)
1.2 Chinese philosophy books (by Emperor Qin Shi Huang and anti-Qin rebels)
1.3 Protagoras's "On the Gods" (by Athenian authorities)
1.4 Zoroastrian scriptures (by Alexander the Great)
1.5 Jewish holy books (by the Seleucid monarch Antiochus IV)
1.6 Aeneid (unsuccessfully ordered by Virgil)
1.7 Roman history book (by the aediles)
1.8 Torah scroll (by Roman soldier)
1.9 Sorcery scrolls (by early converts to Christianity at Ephesus)
1.10 Rabbi Haninah ben Teradion burned with a Torah scroll (under Hadrian)
1.11 Burning of the Torah by Apostomus (precise time and circumstances debated)
1.12 Epicurus's book (in Paphlagonia)
1.13 Manichean and Christian scriptures (by Diocletian)
1.14 Books of Arianism (after Council of Nicaea)
1.15 Library of Antioch (by Jovian)
1.16 "Unacceptable writings" (by Athanasius)
1.17 The Sibylline books (various times)
1.18 Writings of Priscillian
1.19 Etrusca Disciplina
1.20 Nestorius' books (by Theodosius II)
2 Middle Ages
2.1 Archives of Ctesiphon (during Arab conquest)
2.2 Repeated destruction of Alexandria libraries
2.3 Qur'anic texts with varying wording (ordered by the 3rd Caliph, Uthman)
2.4 Competing prayer books (at Toledo)
2.5 Abelard forced to burn his own book (at Soissons)
2.6 The writings of Arnold of Brescia (at France and Rome)
2.7 Nalanda University
2.8 Samanid Dynasty Library
2.9 Buddhist writings in the Maldives
2.10 Destruction of Cathar texts (Languedoc region of France)
2.11 Maimonides' philosophy (at Montpellier)
2.12 The Talmud (at Paris), first of many such burnings over the next centuries
2.13 The House of Wisdom library (at Baghdad)
2.14 Wycliffe's books (at Prague)
2.15 Codices of the peoples conquered by the Aztecs (by Itzcoatl)
3 Early Modern Period (from 1492 to 1650)
3.1 Library and archives of the Novgorod Republic (by Ivan III and Ivan IV)
3.2 Non-Catholic books (by Torquemada)
3.3 Decameron, Ovid and other "lewd" books (by Savonarola)
3.4 Arabic and Hebrew books (at Andalucia)
3.5 Tyndale's New Testament (in England)
3.6 Angelo Carletti's theological works (by Martin Luther)
3.7 Servetus's writings (burned with their author at Geneva, and also burned at Vienne)
3.8 "The Historie of Italie" (In England)
3.9 Maya sacred books (by Spanish Bishop of Yucatan)
3.10 "Obscene" Maltese poetry (by the Inquisition)
3.11 Arwi Books (by Portugese in India and Ceylon)
3.12 Bernardino de Sahagn's manuscripts on Aztec culture (by Spanish authorities)
3.13 Luther's Bible translation
3.14 Uriel da Costa's book (By Jewish community and city authorities in Amsterdam)
3.15 Marco Antonio de Dominis' writings (in Rome)
4 Early Modern Period (from 1650 until the turn of the 19th century)
4.1 Books burned by civil, military and ecclesiastical authorities between 1640 and 1660 (in Cromwell's England)
10
11
[edit]Antiquity
[edit]Library of Ashurbanipal (by Babylonians, Scythians and Medes)
In 612 BC the Assyrian capital Nineveh was destroyed by a coalition of Babylonians, Scythians and Medes.
During the burning of the Royal Palace, a great fire ravaged the Library of Ashurbanipal where the scholar
King Ashurbanipal had amassed a great number of texts and tablets from various countries. Modern historians
believe the library may have contained a considerable number of texts written on such mediums as leather
scrolls, wax boards, and possibly papyri - all of them vulnerable to fire. However, the considerable number of
clay cuneiform tablets became partially baked.[1] Thus, paradoxically, this potentially destructive event helped
preserve the tablets, which lay in the earth and were eventually found by 19th century archaeologists.
[edit]Chinese philosophy books (by Emperor Qin Shi Huang and anti-Qin rebels)
Main article: Burning of books and burying of scholars
Following the advice of minister Li Si, Emperor Qin Shi Huang ordered the burning of all philosophy books and
history books from states other than Qin beginning in 213 BCE. This was followed by the live burial of a large
number of intellectuals who did not comply with the state dogma.
Li Si is reported to have said: "I, your servant, propose that all historian's records other than those of Qin's be
burned. With the exception of the academics whose duty includes possessing books, if anyone under
heaven has copies of the Shi Jing, the Classic of History, or the writings of the hundred schools of philosophy,
they shall deliver them [the books] to the governor or the commandant for burning. Anyone who dares to discuss
the Shi Jing or the Classic of History shall be publicly executed. Anyone who uses history to criticize the present
shall have his family executed. Any official who sees the violations but fails to report them is equally guilty.
Anyone who has failed to burn the books after thirty days of this announcement shall be subjected
to tattooing and be sent to build the Great Wall. The books that have exemption are those on
medicine, divination, agriculture andforestry. Those who have interest in laws shall instead study from
officials."[2]
The damage to Chinese culture was compounded during the revolts which ended the short rule of Qin Er Shi,
Qin Shi Huang's son. The imperial palace and state archives were burned, destroying many of the remaining
written records that had been spared by the father.
Several other large book burnings also occurred in Chinese history. [3] It appears they occurred in every dynasty
following the Qin, but it is unknown how often.[4]
[edit]Protagoras's "On the Gods" (by Athenian authorities)
The Classical Greek philosopher Protagoras was a proponent of agnosticism, writing in a now lost work
entitled On the Gods: "Concerning the gods, I have no means of knowing whether they exist or not or of what
sort they may be, because of the obscurity of the subject, and the brevity of human life.[5] According to Diogenes
Laertius, the above outspoken Agnostic position taken by Protagoras aroused anger, causing the Athenians to
expel him from their city, where the authorities ordered all copies of the book to be collected and burned in the
marketplace. The same story is also mentioned by Cicero.[6] However, the Classicist John Burnet doubts this
account, as both Diogenes Laertius and Cicero wrote hundreds of years later and no such persecution of
Protagoras is mentioned by contemporaries who make extensive references to this philosopher. [7] Burnet notes
that even if some copies of Protagoras' book were burned, enough of them survived to be known and discussed
in the following century.
12
13
of Valencia offered the deacon who would become known as Saint Vincent of Saragossa to have his life spared
in exchange for his consigning Scripture to the fire. Vincent refused and let himself be executed instead. In
religious paintings he is often depicted holding the book whose preservation he preferred to his own life (see
illustration in Saint Vincent of Saragossa page.)[22]
[edit]Books of Arianism (after Council of Nicaea)
Burning of Arian books at Nicaea (illustration from a compendium of canon law, ca. 825, MS. in the Capitular Library, Vercelli)
The books of Arius and his followers, after the first Council of Nicaea (325 C.E.), were burned
for heresy. Arius was exiled and presumably assassinated following this, and Arian books continued to be
regularly burned into the 330s.[23]
[edit]Library of Antioch (by Jovian)
In 364, the Christian Emperor Jovian ordered the entire Library of Antioch to be burnt.[24] It had been heavily
stocked by the aid of his non-Christian predecessor, Emperor Julian.
[edit]"Unacceptable writings" (by Athanasius)
Elaine Pagels claims that in 367, Athanasius ordered monks in the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria in his
role as bishop of Alexandria to destroy all "unacceptable writings" in Egypt, the list of writings to be saved
constituting the New Testament.[25]
[edit]The Sibylline books (various times)
The Sibylline Books were a collection of oracular sayings. According to
myth,[26] the Cumaean sibyl offered Lucius Tarquinius Superbus the books for a high price, and when he
refused, burned three. When he refused to buy the remaining six at the same price, she again burned three,
finally forcing him to buy the last three at the original price. The quindecimviri sacris faciundis watched over the
surviving books in the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus, but could not prevent their being burned when the
temple burned down in 83 BCE. They were replaced by a similar collection of oracular sayings from around the
Mediterranean in 76 BCE, along with the sayings of the Tiburtine sibyl, and then checked by priests for
perceived accuracy as compared to the burned originals.[27] These remained until for political reasons they were
burned by Flavius Stilicho (died 408).[28]
[edit]Writings of Priscillian
In 385, the theologian Priscillian of vila became the first Christian to be executed by fellow-Christians as
a heretic. Some (though not all) of his writings were condemned as heretical and burned. For many centuries
they were considered irreversibly lost, but surviving copies were discovered in the 19th century. [29]
[edit]Etrusca Disciplina
Etrusca Disciplina, the Etruscan books of cult and divination, were collected and burned in the 5th century. [30][31]
[edit]Nestorius' books (by Theodosius II)
The books of Nestorius, declared to be heresy, were burned under an edict of Theodosius II(435).[32][33] The
Greek originals of most writings were irrevocably destroyed, surviving mainly in Syriac translations.
[edit]Middle
Ages
14
15
Detail of a Pedro Berruguete painting of a disputation between Saint Dominic of Guzman and theAlbigensians (Cathars) in which
the books of both were thrown on a fire, with St. Dominic's books miraculously preserved from the flames. See the whole picture.
During the 13th century, the Catholic Church waged a brutal campaign against
the Cathars of Languedoc (smaller numbers also lived elsewhere in Europe), culminating in the Albigensian
Crusade. Nearly every Cathar text that could be found was destroyed, in an effort to completely extirpate their
heretical beliefs; only a few are known to have survived.[45]
[edit]Maimonides' philosophy (at Montpellier)
Maimonides' major philosophical and theological work, "Guide for the Perplexed", got highly mixed reactions
from fellow-Jews of his and later times some revering it and viewing it as a triumph, while others deemed
many of its ideas heretical, banning it and on some occasions burning copies of it.[46] One such burning took
place at Montpellier, Southern France, in 1233.[citation needed]
[edit]The Talmud (at Paris), first of many such burnings over the next centuries
In 1242, The French crown burned all Talmud copies in Paris, about 12,000, after the book was "charged" and
"found guilty" in the Paris trial sometimes called "the Paris debate".[47] This burnings of Hebrew books were
initiated by Pope Gregory IX, who persuaded French King Louis IX to undertake it. This particular book burning
was commemorated by the German Rabbi and poetMeir of Rothenburg in the elegy (kinna) called "Ask, O you
who are burned in fire" () , which is recited to this day by Ashkenazi Jews on the fast of Tisha
B'av.
Since the Church and Christian states viewed the Talmud as a book hateful and insulting toward Christ and
gentiles[citation needed], subsequent popes were also known to organize public burnings of Jewish books. The most
well known of them were Innocent IV (12431254), Clement IV (12561268), John XXII (13161334), Paul
IV (15551559), Pius V (15661572) and Clement VIII (15921605).
Once the printing press was invented, the Church found it impossible to destroy entire printed editions of the
Talmud and other sacred books. Johann Gutenberg, the German who invented the printing press around 1450,
certainly helped stamp out the effectiveness of further book burnings. The tolerant (for its time) policies of
Venice made it a center for the printing of Jewish books (as of books in general), yet the Talmud was publicly
burned in 1553 and there was a lesser known burning of Hebrew book in 1568. [citation needed]
[edit]The House of Wisdom library (at Baghdad)
The House of Wisdom was destroyed during the Mongol invasion of Baghdad in 1258, along with all other
libraries in Baghdad. It was said that the waters of the Tigris ran black for six months with ink from the enormous
quantities of books flung into the river.[citation needed]
[edit]Wycliffe's books (at Prague)
In 1410 John Wycliffe's books were burnt by the illiterate Prague archbishop Zbynk Zajc z Hzmburka in the
court of his palace in Lesser Town of Prague to hinder the spread ofJan Hus's teaching.[48]
[edit]Codices of the peoples conquered by the Aztecs (by Itzcoatl)
According to the Madrid Codex, the fourth tlatoani Itzcoatl (ruling from 1427 (or 1428) to 1440) ordered the
burning of all historical codices because it was "not wise that all the people should know the
paintings".[49] Among other purposes, this allowed the Aztec state to develop a state-sanctioned history and
mythos that venerated the Aztec godHuitzilopochtli.
16
[edit]Early
[edit]Library and archives of the Novgorod Republic (by Ivan III and Ivan IV)
In the course of the Novgorod Republic's conquest and subjugation by the rising power of Muscovy, the
Republic's library and archives were destroyed, simultaneously with many of the republic's citizens being
massacred and tortured and its wealth being looted. The library's destruction can be variously dated either to
Novgorod's conquest by Ivan III in 1478, or to the 1570 Massacre of Novgorod perpetrated by his grandson Ivan
IV.[50]
[edit]Non-Catholic books (by Torquemada)
In the 1480s Tomas Torquemada promoted the burning of non-Catholic literature, especially the Jewish Talmud
and also Arabic books after the final defeat of the Moors at Granadain 1492.[citation needed]
[edit]Decameron, Ovid and other "lewd" books (by Savonarola)
Main article: Bonfire of the Vanities
In 1497, followers of the Italian priest Girolamo Savonarola collected and publicly burned books and objects
which were deemed to be "immoral", some but by no means all of which might fit modern criteria of
pornography or "lewd pictures", as well as pagan books, gaming tables, cosmetics, copies
of Boccaccio's Decameron, and all the works of Ovidwhich could be found in Florence.[citation needed]
[edit]Arabic and Hebrew books (at Andalucia)
In 1490 a number of Hebrew Bibles and other Jewish books were burned at the behest of the Spanish
Inquisition. In 1499 about 5000 Arabic manuscripts were consumed by flames in the public square at Granada
on the orders of Ximnez de Cisneros, Archbishop of Toledo.[51][52] Many of the poetic works were allegedly
destroyed on account of their symbolized homoeroticism.[53] The German Romantic poet Heinrich Heine wrote
about this, stating "Dort, wo man Bcher verbrennt, verbrennt man am Ende auch Menschen" (Where they burn
books, they will also, in the end, burn humans), a quote written on the monument for the Nazi book burnings
today.
[edit]Tyndale's New Testament (in England)
In October 1526 William Tyndale's English translation of the New Testament was burned in London by Cuthbert
Tunstal, Bishop of London.[citation needed]
[edit]Angelo Carletti's theological works (by Martin Luther)
Angelo Carletti di Chivasso's work on Scotist theology, widely taken up in the Catholic Church, so
infuriated Martin Luther that the Protestant founder had it publicly burned.
[edit]Servetus's writings (burned with their author at Geneva, and also burned at
Vienne)
In 1553, Servetus was burned as a heretic at the order of the city council of Geneva, dominated by Calvin
because a remark in his translation of Ptolemy's Geographia was considered an intolerable heresy. As he was
placed on the stake, "around [Servetus'] waist were tied a large bundle of manuscript and a thick octavo printed
book", hisChristianismi Restitutio. In the same year the Catholic authorities at Vienne also burned Servetus in
effigy together with whatever of his writings fell into their hands, in token of the fact that Catholics and
Protestants mutually hostile in this time were united in regarding Servetus as a heretic and seeking to
extirpate his works. At the time it was considered that they succeeded, but three copies were later found to have
survived, from which all later editions were printed.[citation needed]
[edit]"The Historie of Italie" (In England)
"The Historie of Italie" (1549), a scholarly and in itself not particularly controversial book by William Thomas, was
in 1554 suppressed and publicly burnt by order of Queen Mary I of England after its author was executed on
charges of treason. Enough copies survived for new editions to be published in 1561 and 1562, after Elizabeth
I came to power.[54]
[edit]Maya sacred books (by Spanish Bishop of Yucatan)
July 12, 1562, Fray Diego de Landa, acting Bishop of Yucatan then recently conquered by the Spanish
threw into the fires the sacred books of the Maya.[55] The number of destroyed books is greatly disputed. De
Landa himself admitted to 27, other sources claim "99 times as many" the later being disputed as an
exaggeration motivated by anti-Spanish feeling, the so-called Black Legend. Only three Maya codices and a
fragment of a fourth survive. Approximately 5,000 Maya cult images were also burned at the same time. The
burning of books and images alike were part of de Landa's effort to eradicate the Maya "idol worship", which he
considered "diabolical". As narrated by de Landa himself, he had gained access to the sacred books,
transcribed on deerskin, by previously gaining the natives' trust and showing a considerable interest in their
culture and language:[56][57]"We found a large number of books in these characters and, as they contained
17
nothing in which were not to be seen as superstition and lies of the devil, we burned them all, which they (the
Maya) regretted to an amazing degree, and which caused them much affliction."[58] De Landa was later recalled
to Spain and accused of having acted illegally in Yucatan, though eventually found not guilty of these charges.
Present-day apologists for de Landa assert that, while he had destroyed the Maya books, his own Relacin de
las cosas de Yucatn is a major source for the Mayan language and culture. Allen Wells calls his work an
ethnographic masterpiece,[59] while William J. Folan, Laraine A. Fletcher and Ellen R. Kintz have written that
Landas account of Maya social organization and towns before conquest is a gem. [60]
[edit]"Obscene" Maltese poetry (by the Inquisition)
In 1584 Pasquale Vassallo, a Maltese Dominican friar, wrote a collection of songs, of the kind known as
"canczuni", in Italian and Maltese. The poems fell into the hands of other Dominican friars who denounced him
for writing "obscene literature". At the order of the Inquisition in 1585 the poems were burned for this allegedly
'obscene' content.[61]
[edit]Arwi Books (by Portugese in India and Ceylon)
With the 16th Century extension of the Portugese Empire to India and Ceylon, the staunchly Catholic colonizers
were hostile to Muslims they found living there. An aspect of this was a Portugese hostility to and destruction of
writings in the Arwi languague, a type of Tamil with many Arabic words, written in a variety of the Arabic script
and used by local Muslims. Much of the Arwi cultural heritage was destroyed in that time, though the precise
extent of destruction might never be known.
[edit]Bernardino de Sahagn's manuscripts on Aztec culture (by Spanish authorities)
The 12-volume work known as the Florentine Codex, result of a decades-long meticulous research conducted
by the Fransciscan Bernardino de Sahagn in Mexico, is among the most important sources on Aztec culture
and society as they were before the Spanish conquest, and on the Nahuatl language. However, upon Sahagn's
return to Europe in 1585, his original manuscripts including the records of conversations and interviews with
indigenous sources in Tlatelolco, Texcoco, and Tenochtitlan, and likely to have included much primary material
which did not get into the final codex were confiscated by the Spanish authorities, disappeared irrevocably,
and are assumed to have been destroyed. The Florentine Codex itself was for centuries afterwards only known
in heavily-censored versions.[citation needed]
[edit]Luther's Bible translation
Martin Luther's German translation of the Bible was burned in Catholic-dominated parts of Germany in 1624, by
order of the Pope part of the exacerbation of Catholic-Protestant relations due to the Thirty Years' War, then in
its early stages.[citation needed]
[edit]Uriel da Costa's book (By Jewish community and city authorities in Amsterdam)
The 1624 book An Examination of the Traditions of the Pharisees, written by the dissident Jewish
intellectual Uriel da Costa, was burned in public by joint action of the Amsterdam Jewish Community and the
city's Protestant-dominated City Council. The book, which questioned the fundamental idea of the immortality of
the soul, was considered heretical from the Jewish and the Christian points of view alike.[citation needed]
[edit]Marco Antonio de Dominis' writings (in Rome)
The theologian and scientist Marco Antonio de Dominis came in 1624 into conflict with the Inquisition in Rome
and was declared "a relapsed heretic". He died in prison, which did not end his trial. On December 21, 1624 his
body was burned together with his works.[citation needed]
[edit]Early
Modern Period (from 1650 until the turn of the 19th century)
[edit]Books
18
19
The four remaining copies, though suffering some damage during World War II, are still preserved at four
Chinese museums and libraries.
[edit]Anti-Wilhelm Tell tract (at Canton of Uri)
The 1760 tract by Simeon Uriel Freudenberger from Luzern, arguing that Wilhelm Tell was a myth and the acts
attributed to him had not happened in reality, was publicly burnt inAltdorf, capital of the Swiss canton of Uri
where, according to the legend, William Tell shot the apple from his son's head.[citation needed]
[edit]Books by Voltaire
Voltaire, the pen name of Franois-Marie Arouet, was a writer whose works were burnt several times in prerevolutionary France. His "Lettres philosophique", published in Rouen in 1734 and giving his describing British
attitudes toward government, literature, and religion clearly implied that the British constitutional monarchy was
better than the French absolute one which led to the book being burned.
Later, Voltaire's Dictionnaire philosophique, which was originally called the Dictionnaire philosophique portatif,
had its first volume, consisting of 73 articles in 344 pages, burnt upon release in June 1764.[66]
An "economic pamphlet", Man With Forty Crowns, was ordered to be burnt by Parliament, and a bookseller who
had sold a copy was pilloried. It is said that one of the magistrateson the case exclaimed, "Is it only his books
we shall burn?"[67]
[edit]Vernacular Catholic hymn books (at Mainz)
In 1787, an attempt by the Catholic authorities at Mainz to introduce vernacular hymn books encountered strong
resistance from conservative Catholics, who refused to abandon the old Latin books and who seized and burned
copies of the new German language books.[68]
[edit]Egyptian archaeological finds (threatened burning by French scholars)
Many French scholars accompanied Napoleon's invasion of Egypt in 1799, where they made many important
finds. When forced to surrender to the British in 1801, the scholars initially strongly resisted the claim made by
the British to have the collections of the expedition handed over. tienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire ominously
threatened that, were that British demand persisted in, history would record "a second burning of a library
in Alexandria".[citation needed] The threat was, however, not carried out, and the finds were finally handed over and
ended up in the British Museum.
[edit]Industrial
Revolution period
20
rare books in its library though in this case the arsonists did not specifically target the books, but rather sought
to destroy indiscriminately everything belonging to Irish Catholic immigrants. [citation needed]
[edit]Chinese literary works (By Anglo-French troops in Beijing)
In 1860, during the Second Opium War, twenty captive Westerners were tortured and killed by the Chinese
government. In retaliation, the British High Commissioner to China, Lord Elgin, ordered the destruction of
The Old Summer Palace in Beijing, which was then carried out by French and British troops. The palace
complex had been built up by succeeding Chinese dynasties for nearly a thousand years, and many unique
works of art were destroyed or looted by the soldiers. Also unique copies of Chinese literary work and
compilations, stored there, were burned down as part of the general destruction.
[edit]Edmond Potonie's papers (by French Police)
In 1868 the French police, under Napoleon the Third, seized the extensive papers and Europe-wide
correspondence of the Parisian Pacifist and Social Reformer Edmond Potonie. The papers, which might have
been of considerable value to historians, have disappeared irrevocably and are assumed to have been
destroyed.[72]
[edit]"Lewd" books (by Anthony Comstock and the NYSSV)
Anthony Comstock founded the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice in 1873 and over the years
burned 15 tons of books, 284,000 pounds of plate, and almost 4 million pictures. Lobbying the United States
Congress also led to the enactment of the Comstock laws.[citation needed]
[edit]Emily Dickinson's correspondence (on her orders)
Following the death of noted American poet Emily Dickinson in 1890, her sister Lavinia Dickinson burned almost
all of her correspondences in keeping with Emily's wishes, but as it was unclear whether the forty notebooks and
loose sheets all filled with almost 1800 poems were to be included in this, Lavinia saved these and began to
publish the poems that year.[73][74]
[edit]Ivan Bloch's research on Russian Jews (by Tsarist Russian government)
In 1901 the Russian Council of Ministers banned a five-volume work on the socio-economic conditions of Jews
in the Russian Empire, the result of a decade-long comprehensive statistical research commissioned by Ivan
Bloch. (It was entitled "Comparison of the material and moral levels in the Western Great-Russian and Polish
Regions"). The research's conclusions that Jewish economic activity was beneficial to the Empire refuted
antisemitic demagoguery and were disliked by the government, which ordered all copies to be seized and
burned. Only a few survived, circulating as great rarities. [citation needed]
[edit]WWI
21
In 1933, Nazis burned works of Jewish authors, and other works considered "un-German", at the library of the Institut fr
Sexualwissenschaft in Berlin.
The works of some Jewish authors and other so-called "degenerate" books were burnt by the Nazis in the
1930s and 1940s. Richard Euringer, director of the libraries in Essen, identified 18,000 works deemed not to
correspond with Nazi ideology, which were publicly burned.
On May 10, 1933 on the Opernplatz in Berlin, S.A. and Nazi youth groups burned around 25,000 books from
the Institut fr Sexualwissenschaft and the Humboldt University; including works by Albert Einstein, Vicki
Baum, Bertolt Brecht, Heinrich Heine,Helen Keller, Thomas Mann, Karl Marx, Erich Maria Remarque, Frank
Wedekind, Ernest Hemingway and H.G. Wells. Student groups throughout Germany in 34 towns also carried out
their own book burnings on that day and in the following weeks. Erich Kstner wrote an ironic account
(published only after the fall of Nazism) of having witnessed the burning of his own books on that occasion.
Radio broadcasts of the burnings were played in Berlin and elsewhere, and 40,000 turned up to hear Joseph
Goebbelsmake a speech about the acts. See here for a partial list of authors whose books were burned.[citation
needed]
In May 1995,[79] Micha Ullman's underground Bibliotek memorial was inaugurated on Bebelplatz square in
Berlin, where the Nazi book burnings began. The memorial consists of a window on the surface of the plaza,
under which vacant bookshelves are lit and visible. A bronze plaque bears a quote by Heinrich Heine: Where
books are burned in the end people will burn.[80]
[edit]Theodore Dreiser's works (at Warsaw, Indiana)
Trustees of Warsaw, Indiana ordered the burning of all the library's works by local author Theodore Dreiser in
1935.[81]
[edit]Pompeu Fabra's library (by Spanish troops)
In 1939, shortly after the surrendering of Barcelona, Franco's troops burned the entire library of Pompeu Fabra,
the main author of the normative reform of contemporary Catalan language, while shouting "Abajo la
inteligencia!" (Down with intelligentsia!). .[82]
[edit]World
War II
22
Works of Macrobius, ca. 1470 is one of the books burned by the Germans during the Planned destruction of Warsaw.[86]
Much of Warsaw, Poland was destroyed during World War II by the Nazis: an approximated 85% of buildings,
including 16,000,000 volumes. 10% of the buildings were destroyed in the Invasion of Poland that ignited the
war in 1939, 15% in the reorganization of Warsaw and the first Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, 25% in the second and
far more famous Uprising, and the last 35% due to systematic German actions after the Uprising was defeated.
14 libraries, not including the libraries in the University of Warsaw and the Warsaw Institute of Technology that
were also razed, were completely burned to the ground. German Verbrennungskommandos (Burning
detachments) were responsible for much of the targeted attacks on libraries and other centers of knowledge and
learning.
In October 1944, the National Library of Poland's manuscript collection was burned to erase Polish national
history.
The Krasiski Library had part of its building destroyed in September 1939, leading to its collections, which had
almost all survived, being moved in 1941. In September 1944, an original collection of 250,000 items was
shelled by German artillery, although many books were saved by being thrown out the windows by library staff.
In October, what had survived was deliberately burned by the authorities, including 26,000 manuscripts,
2,500 incunables (printed before 1501), 80,000 early printed books, 100,000 drawings and printmakings, 50,000
note and theatre manuscripts, and many maps and atlases.
23
The Zauski Library established in 1747 and thus the oldest public library in Poland and one of the oldest and
most important libraries in Europe was burned down during the Uprising in October 1944. Out of about
400,000 printed items, maps and manuscripts, only some 1800 manuscripts and 30,000 printed materials
survived. Unlike earlier Nazi book burnings where specific books were deliberately targeted, the burning of this
library was part of the general setting on fire of a large part of the city of Warsaw.
The extensive library of the Polish Museum, Rapperswil, founded in 1870 in Rapperswil, Switzerland, had been
created when Poland was not a country and was thus moved to Warsaw in 1927. Through 1944, most of the
library's 20,000 engravings, 92,000 books, and 27,000 manuscripts were burned. [citation needed]
[edit]Books in the National Library of Serbia (by World War II German bomber planes)
In World War II, bomber planes under orders by Nazi Germany specifically targeted the National Library of
Serbia in Belgrade. All the collections were destroyed, totaling 500,000 books, 1,424 Cyrillic manuscripts and
charters, 1,500 maps and prints, 4,000 journals, 1,800 newspaper titles, and Serbian historical
correspondences.[citation needed]
[edit]Douai Municipal Library
on August 11, 1944, the Bibliothque Municipale of Douai, France, was burned in an Allied bombing of the city
following the Normandy landings. The library had been founded byLouis XV in 1767 and included many rare and
valuable books. Also destroyed in the fire were many of the former holdings of the University of Douai and the
collections of the Jesuits of the College of Anchin, both of which had been transferred to the Municipal Library
during the French Revolution.
[edit]Books in German libraries (by World War II Allied bomber planes)
The firebombing of German cities during World War II caused extensive destruction of German libraries,
including the Library of the Technical University of Aachen (50,000 volumes), the Berlin Staatsbibliothek (2
million volumes), the Berlin University Library (20,000 volumes), the Bonn University Library (25% of its
holdings), the Bremen Staatsbibliothek (150,000 volumes), the Hessische Landesbibliothek in Darmstadt
(760,000 volumes), the Library of the Technical University in Darmstadt (two thirds of its collection), the Stadtund Landesbibliothek in Dortmund (250,000 of 320,000 volumes), the Schsische Landesbibliothek in Dresden
(300,000 volumes), the Stadtbibliothek in Dresden (200,000 volumes), the Essen Stadtbcherei (130,000
volumes), the Frankfurt Stadt- und Universittsbibliothek (550,000 volumes, 440,000 doctoral dissertations,
750,000 patents), the Giessen University Library (nine tenths of its collection), the Greifswald University Library
(17,000 volumes), the Hamburg Staats- und Universittsbibliothek (600,000 volumes), the Hamburg CommerzBibliothek (174,000 of 188,000 volumes), the Hannover Stadtbibliothek (125,000 volumes), the Badische
Landesbibliothek in Karlsruhe (360,000 volumes), the Library of the Technical University in Karlsruhe (63,000
volumes), the Kassel Landesbibliothek (350,000 of 400,000 volumes), the Murhardsche Bibliothek in Kassel
(100,000 volumes), the Kiel University Library (250,000 volumes), the Leipzig Stadtbibliothek (175,000 of
181,000 volumes), the Magdeburg Stadtbibliothek (140,000 of 180,000 volumes), the Marburg University Library
(50,000 volumes), the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek in Munich (500,000 volumes), the Munich University Library
(350,000 volumes), the Munich Stadtbibliothek (80,000 volumes), the Munich Benedictine Library (120,000
volumes), the Mnster University Library (360,000 volumes), the Nrnberg Stadtbibliothek (100,000 volumes),
the Wrttembergische Landesbibliothek in Stuttgart (580,000 volumes), the Library of the Technical University in
Stuttgart (50,000 volumes), the Wrzburg University Library (200,000 volumes and 230,000 doctoral
dissertations). The above is only a shortlist of the most notable losses, in all it's estimated that a third of all
German books were destroyed[87]
[edit]Cold
Germany)
Main article: Denazification
On May 13, 1946 the Allied Control Council issued a directive for the confiscation on all media that could
contribute to Nazism or militarism. As a consequence a list was drawn up of over 30,000 book titles, ranging
from school textbooks to poetry, which were then banned. All copies of books on the list were confiscated and
destroyed; the possession of a book on the list was made a punishable offence. All the millions of copies of
these books were to be confiscated and destroyed. The representative of the Military Directorate admitted that
the order was in principle no different from the Nazi book burnings.[88]
24
The Mass Psychology of Fascism, one of Reich's books which was ordered burned.
25
Following the 1964 Brazilian coup d'tat, General Justino Alves Bastos, commander of the Third Army, ordered,
in Rio Grande do Sul, the burning of all "subversive books". Among the books he branded as subversive was
Stendhal's The Red and the Black.[93]
[edit]Religious, Anti-Communist and Genealogy books (in the Cultural Revolution)
It is the Chinese tradition to record family members in a book, including every male born in the family, who they
are married to, etc. Traditionally, only males' names are recorded in the books. During the Cultural
Revolution (19661976), many such books were forcibly destroyed or burned to ashes, because they were
considered by the Chinese communist party as among the Four Old Things to be eschewed.[94] Also many
copies of classical works of Chinese literature were destroyed, though unlike the genealogy books these
usually existed in many copies, some of which survived. Many copies of the Buddhist, Taoist and Confucian
books were destroyed, though to be promoting the "old" thinking.
[edit]Leftist books in Chile after the 1973 coup d'tat
After the victory of Augusto Pinochet's fascist forces in the Chilean coup of 1973, bookburnings of Marxist and
other works ensued. Journalist Carlos Rama reported in February 1974 that up to that point, destroyed works
included: the handwritten Chilean Declaration of Independence by Bernardo O'Higgins, thousands of books in
the Editorial Quimant (a printing house) including the Complete Works of Che Guevara, thousands of books in
the part headquarters of the Chilean Socialist Party and MAPU, personal copies of works byMarx, Lenin, and
anti-fascist thinkers, and thousands of copies of newspapers and magazines favorable to Salvador
Allende including Chile Today.[95]
[edit]Burning of Jaffna library
Main article: Burning of Jaffna library
In May 1981 a mob composed of thugs and plainclothes police officers went on a rampage in minority Tamildominated northern Jaffna, Sri Lanka, and burned down the Jaffna Public Library. At least 95,000 volumes were
destroyed, including a very rare collection of ancient palm leaf volumes.[96]
[edit]The Satanic Verses (in the United Kingdom)
The 1988 publication of the novel The Satanic Verses, by Salman Rushdie, provoked angry demonstrations and
riots around the world by followers of political Islam, some of whom considered it blasphemous. In the United
Kingdom, book burnings were staged in the cities of Bolton and Bradford. In addition, five U.K. bookstores
selling the novel were the target of bombings, and two bookstores in Berkeley, California were firebombed.[citation
needed]
26
ransacked the press, the museum, the video facilities and the library, destroying some books in the fire and
throwing others in a nearby river. Not a single book was spared, including a thousand-year-old Quran.[100]
[edit]21st
Century
27
trash can (as recorded on video which was submitted to People For the American Way's Right Wing Watch
blog[113]); nevertheless, the church claimed that the book "burning" was a success. [114]
[edit]201011 Florida Qu'ran burning and related burnings
Main article: 2010 Qur'an-burning controversy
Terry Jones of the Dove World Outreach Center in Gainesville, Florida announced in July 2010 that he
threatened to burn 200 copies of the Qur'an on September 11, 2010, then did not do so.[115] However, after
promising not to, he proceeded to burn a Qur'an in the sanctuary of the church March 20, 2011 [116]
On September 11, 2010:
Mohammed Vawda publicized his intentions to burn a Bible in retaliation in Johannesburg, but was stopped by a
South African judge after a Muslim group brought Vawda to court[117]
Fred Phelps burned a Qur'an with the American flag at the Westboro Baptist Church[118]
Bob Old and another preacher burned a Qur'an in Nashville, Tennessee[119]
A New Jersey transit worker burned a few pages of a Qur'an at the Ground Zero Mosque in Manhattan[120]
Alex Stewart smoked a roll of pages from the Bible and the Qur'an in Brisbane[121]
Burned Qur'ans were found in Knoxville, Tennessee, East Lansing, Michigan, Springfield, Tennessee, and
Chicago, Illinois.[122][123][124]
[edit]Operation Dark Heart, memoir by Anthony Shaffer (by The United States
Pentagon)
On September 20, 2010 the Pentagon bought[125] and burned[126] 9,500 copies of Operation Dark Heart, nearly
all the first run copies for supposedly containing classified information.
[edit]The burning of the library in the Institute d'Egypt in Cairo
On December 19, 2011, protesters against the military government in Egypt, burnt the library in the Institute
d'Egypt in Cairo. Images of men on TV were shown dancing around the fire. They burnt thousands of rare
books, journals and writings. The cost of the material is estimated at tens of millions of dollars much that was
lost was considered priceless.[127]
[edit]Suspected Colorado City incident
Sometime during the weekend of April 1517, 2011, books and other items designated for a new public library in
the FLDS polygamous community Colorado City, Arizona were removed from the facility where they had been
stored and burned nearby.[128] A lawyer for some FLDS members has stated that the burning was the result of a
cleanup of the property and that no political or religious statement was intended, however the burned items were
under lock and key and were not the property of those who burned them. [129] As of May 31, Arizona officials are
investigating.
[edit]Qur'ans in Afghanistan
Main article: 2012 Afghanistan Quran burning protests
On February 22, 2012, 4 copies of the Qur'an were burned at Bagram Airfield due to being among 1,652 books
slated for destruction. The remaining books, which officials claimed were being used for communication among
extremists, were saved and put into storage.[130]
28
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humpty_dumpty
Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall,
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again.[1]
Humpty appears in Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking-Glass (1872), where he
discusses semantics and pragmatics with Alice.
I dont know what you mean by glory, Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. Of course you donttill I tell you. I meant theres a nice
knock-down argument for you!
But glory doesnt mean a nice knock-down argument, Alice objected.
When I use a word, Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, it means just what I choose it to
meanneither more nor less.
The question is, said Alice, whether you can make words mean so many different things.
The question is, said Humpty Dumpty, which is to be master
thats all.
Alice was too much puzzled to say anything, so after a minute Humpty Dumpty began again. Theyve
a temper, some of themparticularly verbs, theyre the proudestadjectives you can do anything
with, but not verbshowever, I can manage the whole lot! Impenetrability! Thats what I say![15]
This passage was used in Britain by Lord Atkin and in his dissenting judgement in the seminal
case Liversidge v. Anderson (1942), where he protested about the distortion of a statute by the majority
of the House of Lords.[16] It also became a popular citation in United States legal opinions, appearing
in 250 judicial decisions in the Westlaw database as of April 19, 2008, including two Supreme Court
cases (TVA v. Hill and Zschernig v. Miller).[17]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Orwell
Eric Arthur Blair (25 June 1903 21 January 1950),[3] better known by his pen name George
Orwell, was an English author and journalist. His work is marked by keen intelligence and wit, a
profound awareness of social injustice, an intense opposition to totalitarianism, a passion for clarity in
language, and a belief in democratic socialism.[4][5]
Considered perhaps the twentieth century's best chronicler of English culture,[6] Orwell wrote fiction,
polemical journalism, literary criticism and poetry. He is best known for the dystopian novel Nineteen
Eighty-Four (published in 1949) and the satirical novella Animal Farm (1945)they have together
sold more copies than any two books by any other twentieth-century author.[7] His 1938 book Homage
to Catalonia , an account of his experiences as a volunteer on the Republican side during the Spanish
Civil War, together with numerous essays on politics, literature, language, and culture, are widely
acclaimed.
29
Orwell's influence on contemporary culture, popular and political, continues decades after his death.
Several of his neologisms, along with the term "Orwellian"now a byword for any oppressive or
manipulative social phenomenon opposed to a free societyhave entered the vernacular.
In his essay Politics and the English Language (1946), Orwell wrote about the importance of honest
and clear language and said that vague
the 'puritan middle class', who had stricter morals than the aristocracy, tightened the rules of censorship
in the 19th century. Orwell's first article to be published in his home country, A Farthing Newspaper,
was a critique of the new French daily, the Ami de Peuple. This paper was sold much more cheaply
than most others, and was intended for ordinary people to read. However, Orwell pointed out that its
proprietor Franois Coty also owned the rightwing dailies Le Figaro and Le Gaulois, which the Ami de
Peuple was supposedly competing against. Orwell suggested that cheap newspapers were no more than
a vehicle for advertising and anti-leftist propaganda, and predicted that like India, France might soon
see 'free newspapers' which would drive many legitimate dailies out of business.[109]
On anarchism, Orwell wrote in The Road to Wigan Pier: "I worked out an anarchistic theory that all
government is evil, that the punishment always does more harm than the crime and the people can be
trusted to behave decently if you will only let them alone." He continued, however and argued that "it
is always necessary to protect peaceful people from violence. In any state of society where crime can
be profitable you have got to have a harsh criminal law and administer it ruthlessly."
In his reply (dated 15 November 1943) to an invitation from the Duchess of Atholl to speak for the
British League for European Freedom, he stated that he didn't agree with their objectives. He admitted
that what they said was "more truthful than the lying propaganda found in most of the press" but added
that he could not "associate himself with an essentially Conservative body" that claimed to "defend
democracy in Europe" but had "nothing to say about British imperialism". His closing paragraph
stated: "I belong to the Left and must work inside it, much as I hate Russian totalitarianism and its
poisonous influence in this country."[116]
Orwell joined the staff of Tribune as literary editor, and from then until his death, was a left-wing
(though hardly orthodox) Labour-supporting democratic socialist.[117] On 1 September 1944, about the
Warsaw's insurrection, Orwell expressed in Tribune his hostility against the influence of the alliance
with the USSR over the allies: "Do remember that dishonesty and cowardice always have to be paid
for. Do not imagine that for years on end you can make yourself the boot-licking propagandist of the
sovietic regime, or any other regine, and then suddenly return to honesty and reason. Once a whore,
always a whore." According to Newsinger, although Orwell "was always critical of the 194551
Labour government's moderation, his support for it began to pull him to the right politically. This did
not lead him to embrace conservatism, imperialism or reaction, but to defend, albeit critically, Labour
reformism."[118] Between 1945 and 1947, with A. J. Ayer and Bertrand Russell, he contributed a series
of articles and essays to Polemic, a short-lived British "Magazine of Philosophy, Psychology, and
Aesthetics" edited by the ex-Communist Humphrey Slater.[119][120]
Writing in the spring of 1945 a long essay titled "Antisemitism in Britain", for the Contemporary
Jewish Record, Orwell stated that anti-Semitism was on the increase in Britain, and that it was
"irrational and will not yield to arguments". He argued that it would be useful to discover why antiSemites could "swallow such absurdities on one particular subject while remaining sane on others".[121]
He wrote: "For quite six years the English admirers of Hitler contrived not to learn of the existence of
Dachau and Buchenwald. ... Many English people have heard almost nothing about the extermination
of German and Polish Jews during the present war. Their own anti-Semitism has caused this vast crime
to bounce off their consciousness."[122] In Nineteen Eighty-Four, written shortly after the war, Orwell
31
portrayed the Party as enlisting anti-Semitic passions against their enemy, Goldstein. Nevertheless, he
opposed the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine, taking an anti-colonialist stance against
Zionism.[citation needed]
Orwell publicly defended P.G. Wodehouse against charges of being a Nazi sympathiser, a defense
based on Wodehouse's lack of interest in and ignorance of politics.
The British intelligence group Special Branch maintained a file on Orwell for more than 20 years of
his life. The dossier, published by The National Archives, mentions that according to one investigator,
Orwell had "advanced Communist views and several of his Indian friends say that they have often seen
him at Communist meetings". MI5, the intelligence department of the Home Office, noted: "It is
evident from his recent writings 'The Lion and the Unicorn' and his contribution to Gollancz's
symposium The Betrayal of the Left that he does not hold with the Communist Party nor they with
him."[123]
Orwell was noted for very close and enduring friendships with a few friends, but these were generally
people with a similar background or with a similar level of literary ability. Ungregarious, he was out of
place in a crowd and his discomfort was exacerbated when he was outside his own class. Though
representing himself as a spokesman for the common man, he often appeared out of place with real
working people. His brother-in-law Humphrey Dakin, a "Hail fellow, well met" type, who took him to
a local pub in Leeds, said that he was told by the landlord: "Don't bring that bugger in here again".[124]
Adrian Fierz commented "He wasn't interested in racing or greyhounds or pub crawling or shove
ha'penny. He just did not have much in common with people who did not share his intellectual
interests".[125] Awkwardness attended many of his encounters with working-class representatives, as
with Pollitt and McNair.[126] but his courtesy and good manners were often commented on. Jack
Common observed on meeting him for the first time, "Right away manners, and more than manners
breeding showed through".[127]
In 2003, the centenary of Orwell's birth resulted in the two most up-to-date biographies by Gordon
Bowker[158] and D. J. Taylor, both academics and writers in the United Kingdom. Taylor notes the
stage management which surrounds much of Orwell's behaviour,[10] and Bowker highlights the
essential sense of decency which he considers to have been Orwell's main driver.[159][160]
32
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikileaks
3.4 201112
3.5 Announcements of upcoming leaks
4 Backlash and pressure
4.1 Operational challenges
4.2 Response from media
4.3 Response from governments
4.4 Response from corporations
4.5 U.S. diplomatic cables leak responses
4.6 Response from the financial industry
5 Internal conflicts
5.1 Restructuring
5.2 Defections
6 Reception
7 Spin-offs
8 See also
9 Notes
10 References
11 Further reading
12 External links
[edit]History
[edit]Founding
Julian Assange was one of the early members of the WikiLeaks staff and is credited as the site's
founder.
The wikileaks.org domain name was registered on 4 October 2006.[3] The website was unveiled, and
published its first document, in December 2006.[23][24] WikiLeaks has been predominantly
represented in public since January 2007 by Julian Assange, who is now generally recognised as the
"founder of WikiLeaks."[25] According to Wired, a volunteer said that Assange described himself in a
private conversation as "the heart and soul of this organisation, its founder, philosopher, spokesperson,
original coder, organizer, financier, and all the rest."[26]
WikiLeaks relies to some degree on volunteers and previously described its founders as a mix
of Asian dissidents, journalists, mathematicians, and start-up company technologists from the United
States, Taiwan, Europe, Australia, and South Africa[27] (hence its name), but has progressively moved
toward a more traditional publication model and no longer accepts either user comments or edits. As of
June 2009, the site had over 1,200 registered volunteers[27] and listed an advisory board comprising
Assange, his deputy Jash Vora and seven other people, some of which denied any association with the
organisation.[28][29]
Despite using the name "WikiLeaks", the website is no longer wiki-based as of May 2010.[30] Also,
despite some popular confusion[31]due to both having the term "wiki" in their names, WikiLeaks
34
and Wikipedia have no affiliation with each other ("wiki" is not a brand name);[32][33] Wikia, a forprofit corporation loosely affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation, did purchase several WikiLeaksrelated domain names (including wikileaks.com and wikileaks.net) as a "protective brand measure" in
2007.[34]
[edit]Purpose
The WikiLeaks website says their goal is "to bring important news and information to the public... One
of our most important activities is to publish original source material alongside our news stories so
readers and historians alike can see evidence of the truth."
Another of the organisation's goals is to ensure that whistleblowers and journalists are not jailed for
emailing sensitive or classified documents. The online "drop box" (currently not functioning) was
designed to "provide an innovative, secure and anonymous way for sources to leak information to our
journalists."
In an interview on The Colbert Report, Assange discussed the limit to the freedom of speech, saying,
"[it is] not an ultimate freedom, however free speech is what regulates government and regulates law.
That is why in the US Constitution the Bill of Rights says that Congress is to make no such law
abridging the freedom of the press. It is to take the rights of the press outside the rights of the law
because those rights are superior to the law because in fact they create the law. Every constitution,
every bit of legislation is derived from the flow of information. Similarly every government is elected
as a result of people understanding things".[35]
The project has drawn comparisons to Daniel Ellsberg's leaking of the Pentagon Papers in 1971.[36] In
the United States, the leaking of some documents may be legally protected. The U.S. Supreme
Court has ruled that the Constitution guarantees anonymity, at least in the area of political
discourse.[36] Author and journalist Whitley Strieber has spoken about the benefits of the WikiLeaks
project, noting that "Leaking a government document can mean jail, but jail sentences for this can be
fairly short. However, there are many places where it means long incarceration or even death, such as
China and parts of Africa and the Middle East."[37]
[edit]Administration
According to a January 2010 interview, the WikiLeaks team then consisted of five people working
full-time and about 800 people who worked occasionally, none of whom were
compensated.[38] WikiLeaks has no official headquarters. In November 2010 the Wikileaks
endorsed[39] news and activism site Wikileaks Central was set up and was administrated by
editor Heather Marsh who oversaw 70+ writers and volunteers.[40] She resigned as editor in chief,
administrator and domain holder of Wikileaks Central on 8 March 2012.[41]
[edit]Hosting
WikiLeaks describes itself as "an uncensorable system for untraceable mass document
leaking".[42] The site is available on multiple servers and different domain names following a number
of denial-of-service attacks and its severance from different Domain Name System (DNS)
providers.[43][44]
Until August 2010, WikiLeaks was hosted by PRQ, a Sweden-based company providing "highly
secure, no-questions-asked hosting services". PRQ is said to have "almost no information about its
clientele and maintains few if any of its own logs".[45] Currently, WikiLeaks is mainly hosted
by Bahnhof in a facility that used to be a nuclear bunker.[46][47]Other servers are spread around the
world with the central server located in Sweden.[48] Julian Assange has said that the servers are
located in Sweden (and the other countries) "specifically because those nations offer legal protection to
the disclosures made on the site". He talks about the Swedish constitution, which gives the information
providers total legal protection.[48] It is forbidden according to Swedish law for any administrative
authority to make inquiries about the sources of any type of newspaper.[49] These laws, and the
hosting by PRQ, make it difficult for any authorities to take WikiLeaks offline; they place an onus of
proof upon any complainant whose suit would circumscribe WikiLeaks' liberty, e.g. its rights to
35
exercise free speech online. Furthermore, "WikiLeaks maintains its own servers at undisclosed
locations, keeps no logs and uses military-grade encryption to protect sources and other confidential
information." Such arrangements have been called "bulletproof hosting."[45][50]
On 17 August 2010, it was announced that the Swedish Pirate Party would be hosting and managing
many of WikiLeaks' new servers. The party donates servers and bandwidth to WikiLeaks without
charge. Technicians of the party would make sure that the servers are maintained and working.[51][52]
After the site became the target of a denial-of-service attack on its old servers, WikiLeaks moved its
site to Amazon's servers.[53] Later, however, the website was "ousted" from the Amazon
servers.[53] In a public statement, Amazon said that WikiLeaks was not following its terms of service.
The company further explained, "There were several parts they were violating. For example, our terms
of service state that 'you represent and warrant that you own or otherwise control all of the rights to the
content... that use of the content you supply does not violate this policy and will not cause injury to any
person or entity.' It's clear that WikiLeaks doesn't own or otherwise control all the rights to this
classified content."[54] WikiLeaks then decided to install itself on the servers of OVH in
France.[55] After criticism from the French government, the company sought two court rulings about
the legality of hosting WikiLeaks. While the court in Lille immediately declined to force OVH to shut
down the WikiLeaks site, the court in Paris stated it would need more time to examine the highly
technical issue.[56][57]
WikiLeaks is based on several software packages, including Tor[58] and PGP.[citation
needed] WikiLeaks was implemented on MediaWiki software between 2006 and October
2010.[59] WikiLeaks strongly encouraged postings via Tor because of the strong privacy needs of its
users.[60]
On 4 November 2010, Julian Assange told Swiss public television TSR that he is seriously considering
seeking political asylum in neutral Switzerland and setting up a WikiLeaks foundation to move the
operation there.[61][62] According to Assange, Switzerland and Iceland are the only countries where
WikiLeaks would feel safe to operate.[63][64]
[edit]Name servers
WikiLeaks had been using EveryDNS's services, which led to DDoS attacks on the host.[clarification
needed] The attacks affected the quality of service at EveryDNS, so the company withdrew its service
from WikiLeaks. Pro-WikiLeaks supporters retaliated by launching a DDoS attack against EveryDNS.
Because of mistakes in the blogosphere, some supporters accidentally mistook EasyDNS for
EveryDNS and a sizable internet backlash against EasyDNS ensued. Afterwards EasyDNS decided to
provide WikiLeaks its name server service.[65]
[edit]Verification of submissions
WikiLeaks states that it has never released a misattributed document. Documents are assessed before
release. In response to concerns about the possibility of misleading or fraudulent leaks, WikiLeaks has
stated that misleading leaks "are already well-placed in the mainstream media. WikiLeaks is of no
additional assistance."[66] The FAQ states that: "The simplest and most effective countermeasure is a
worldwide community of informed users and editors who can scrutinise and discuss leaked
documents."[67]
According to statements by Assange in 2010, submitted documents are vetted by a group of five
reviewers, with expertise in different fields such as language or programming, who also investigate the
background of the leaker if his or her identity is known.[68] In that group, Assange has the final
decision about the assessment of a document.[68]
[edit]Legal status
[edit]Legal background
The legal status of WikiLeaks is complex. Assange considers WikiLeaks a whistleblower protection
intermediary. Rather than leaking directly to the press, and fearing exposure and retribution,
whistleblowers can leak to WikiLeaks, which then leaks to the press for them.[69] Its servers are
36
located throughout Europe and are accessible from any uncensored web connection. The group located
its headquarters in Sweden because it has one of the worlds strongest shield laws to protect
confidential source-journalist relationships.[70][71]WikiLeaks has stated it does not solicit any
information.[70] However, Assange used his speech during the Hack In The Box conference in
Malaysia to ask the crowd of hackers and security researchers to help find documents on its "Most
Wanted Leaks of 2009" list.[72]
[edit]Potential criminal prosecution
The U.S. Justice Department opened a criminal probe of WikiLeaks and founder Julian Assange
shortly after the leak of diplomatic cables began.[73][74] Attorney General Eric Holder affirmed the
probe was "not sabre-rattling", but was "an active, ongoing criminal investigation."[74] The
Washington Post reported that the department was considering charges under the Espionage Act, a
move which former prosecutors characterised as "difficult" because of First Amendment protections
for the press.[73][75] Several Supreme Court cases have previously established that the American
constitution protects the re-publication of illegally gained information provided the publishers did not
themselves break any laws in acquiring it.[76] Federal prosecutors have also considered prosecuting
Assange for trafficking in stolen government property, but since the diplomatic cables are intellectual
rather than physical property, that approach also faces hurdles.[77] Any prosecution of Assange would
require extraditing him to the United States, a step made more complicated and potentially delayed by
any preceding extradition to Sweden.[78] One of Assange's lawyers, however, says they are fighting
extradition to Sweden because it might lead to his extradition to the United States.[79] Assange's
attorney, Mark Stephens, has "heard from Swedish authorities there has been a secretly empanelled
grand jury in Alexandria [Virginia]" meeting to consider criminal charges in the WikiLeaks case.[80]
In Australia, the government and the Australian Federal Police have not stated what Australian laws
may have been broken by WikiLeaks, but Prime Minister Julia Gillard has stated that the foundation of
WikiLeaks and the stealing of classified documents from the US administration is illegal in foreign
countries.[81] Gillard later clarified her statement as referring to "the original theft of the material by a
junior US serviceman rather than any action by Mr Assange."[82] Spencer Zifcak, President of Liberty
Victoria, an Australian civil liberties group, notes that with no charge, and no trial completed, it is
inappropriate to state that WikiLeaks is guilty of illegal activities.[83]
On threats by various governments toward Assange, legal expert Ben Saul argues that founder Julian
Assange is the target of a global smear campaign to demonise him as a criminal or as a terrorist,
without any legal basis.[84] The U.S. Center for Constitutional Rights has issued a statement
highlighting its alarm at the "multiple examples of legal overreach and irregularities" in his arrest.[85]
[edit]Insurance files
On 29 July 2010 WikiLeaks added a 1.4 GB "Insurance file" to the Afghan War Diary page. The file
is AES encrypted and has a SHA1 checksum of
"cce54d3a8af370213d23fcbfe8cddc8619a0734c".[86][87] There has been speculation that it was
intended to serve as insurance in case the WikiLeaks website or its spokesman Julian Assange are
incapacitated, upon which the passphrase could be published, similar to the concept of a dead man's
switch.[88][89] Following the first few days' release of theUS diplomatic cables starting 28 November
2010, the US television broadcaster CBS predicted that "If anything happens to Assange or the
website, a key will go out to unlock the files. There would then be no way to stop the information from
spreading like wildfire because so many people already have copies."[90] CBS correspondent Declan
McCullagh stated, "What most folks are speculating is that the insurance file contains unreleased
information that would be especially embarrassing to the US government if it were released."[90]
On 22 February 2012, there was another insurance file release, this time 65 GB in size.[91][92]
The insurance files are not to be confused with another encrypted file containing diplomatic
cables, whose password has been compromised. The insurance files' passwords have not been
compromised and their contents are still unknown.
37
[edit]Financing
WikiLeaks is a non-profit organisation, largely supported by volunteers, and it is dependent on public
donations. Its main financing methods include conventional bank transfers andonline payment systems.
Annual expenses have been estimated at about 200,000, mainly for servers and bureaucracy, but
might reportedly reach 600,000 if work currently done by volunteers were paid for.[38]
WikiLeaks' lawyers often work pro bono, and in some cases legal support has been donated by media
organisations such as the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, and the National Newspaper
Publishers Association.[38] WikiLeaks' only revenue stream is donations, but it has considered other
options including an auction model to sell early access to documents.[38] In September 2011,
Wikileaks began auctioning items on eBay to raise funds, and Assange told an audience at Sydney's
Festival of Dangerous Ideas that the organisation might not be able to survive.
[edit]Funding model
The Wau Holland Foundation helps to process donations to WikiLeaks. In July 2010, the Foundation
stated that WikiLeaks was receiving no money for personnel costs, only for hardware, travelling and
bandwidth.[93] An article in TechEye stated:
As a charity accountable under German law, donations for WikiLeaks can be made to the foundation.
Funds are held in escrow and are given to WikiLeaks after the whistleblower website files an
application containing a statement with proof of payment. The foundation does not pay any sort of
salary nor give any renumeration [sic] to WikiLeaks' personnel, corroborating the statement of the
site's former German representative Daniel Schmitt [real name Daniel Domscheit-Berg][94] on
national television that all personnel works voluntarily, even its speakers.[93]
However, in December 2010 the Wau Holland Foundation stated that 4 permanent employees,
including Julian Assange, had begun to receive salaries.[95]
On 24 December 2009, WikiLeaks announced that it was experiencing a shortage of funds[96] and
suspended all access to its website except for a form to submit new material.[97]Material that was
previously published was no longer available, although some could still be accessed on
unofficial mirrors.[98] WikiLeaks stated on its website that it would resume full operation once the
operational costs were covered.[97] WikiLeaks saw this as a kind of strike "to ensure that everyone
who is involved stops normal work and actually spends time raising revenue".[38] While the
organisation initially planned for funds to be secured by 6 January 2010,[99] it was not until 3
February 2010 that WikiLeaks announced that its minimum fundraising goal had been achieved.[100]
On 22 January 2010, PayPal suspended WikiLeaks' donation account and froze its assets. WikiLeaks
said that this had happened before, and was done for "no obvious reason".[101] The account was
restored on 25 January 2010.[102] On 18 May 2010, WikiLeaks announced that its website and
archive were back up.[103]
In June 2010, WikiLeaks was a finalist for a grant of more than half a million dollars from the John S.
and James L. Knight Foundation,[24] but did not make the cut.[104] WikiLeaks commented via
Twitter, "WikiLeaks was highest rated project in the Knight challenge, strongly recommended to the
board but gets no funding. Go figure."[105] WikiLeaks said that the Knight foundation announced the
award to "'12 Grantees who will impact future of news' but not WikiLeaks" and questioned whether
Knight foundation was "really looking for impact".[104] A spokesman of the Knight Foundation
disputed parts of WikiLeaks' statement, saying "WikiLeaks was not recommended by Knight staff to
the board."[105] However, he declined to say whether WikiLeaks was the project rated highest by the
Knight advisory panel, which consists of non-staffers, among them journalist Jennifer 8. Lee, who has
done PR work for WikiLeaks with the press and on social networking sites.[105]
In 2010, WikiLeaks received 635,772.73 in PayPal donations, less 30,000 in PayPal fees, and
695,925.46 in bank transfers. 500,988.89 of the sum was received in the month of December,
primarily as bank transfers as PayPal suspended payments 4 December. 298,057.38 of the remainder
was received in April.[106]
38
The Wau Holland Foundation, one of the WikiLeaks' main funding channels, stated that they received
more than 900,000 in public donations between October 2009 and December 2010, of which
370,000 has been passed on to WikiLeaks. Hendrik Fulda, vice president of the Wau Holland
Foundation, mentioned that the Foundation had been receiving twice as many donations
through PayPal as through normal banks, before PayPal's decision to suspend WikiLeaks' account. He
also noted that every new WikiLeaks publication brought "a wave of support", and that donations were
strongest in the weeks after WikiLeaks started publishing leaked diplomatic cables.[107][108]
On 15 June 2011, WikiLeaks began accepting donations in Bitcoin.[109][110]
The Icelandic judiciary decided that Valitor (company related to visa and mastercard) was violating the
law when it prevented donation to the site by credit card. A justice ruled that the donations will be
allowed to return to the site after 14 days or they would be fined in the amount of U$ 6,000.[111]
[edit]Leaks
Main article: Information published by WikiLeaks
[edit]200608
WikiLeaks posted its first document in December 2006, a decision to assassinate government officials
signed by Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys."[24] In August 2007, The Guardianpublished a story about
corruption by the family of the former Kenyan leader Daniel arap Moi based on information provided
via WikiLeaks.[112] In November 2007, a March 2003 copy of Standard Operating Procedures for
Camp Delta detailing the protocol of the U.S. Army at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp was
released.[113] The document revealed that some prisoners were off-limits to the International
Committee of the Red Cross, something that the U.S. military had in the past repeatedly
denied.[114] In February 2008, WikiLeaks released allegations of illegal activities at the Cayman
Islands branch of the Swiss Bank Julius Baer, which led to the bank suing WikiLeaks and obtaining an
injunction which temporarily shut down wikileaks.org.[115] The California judge had the service
provider of WikiLeaks block the site's domain (wikileaks.org) on 18 February 2008, although the bank
only wanted the documents to be removed but WikiLeaks had failed to name a contact. The site was
instantly mirrored by supporters, and later that month the judge overturned his previous decision
citing First Amendment concerns and questions about legal jurisdiction.[116][117] In March 2008,
WikiLeaks published what they referred to as "the collected secret 'bibles' of Scientology," and three
days later received letters threatening to sue them for breach of copyright.[118] In September 2008,
during the 2008 United States presidential election campaigns, the contents of a Yahoo account
belonging to Sarah Palin (the running mate of Republican presidential nominee John McCain)
were posted on WikiLeaks after being hacked into by members of Anonymous.[119] In November
2008, the membership list of the far-right British National Party was posted to WikiLeaks, after briefly
appearing on a blog.[120] A year later, on October 2009, another list of BNP members was
leaked.[121]
[edit]2009
In January 2009, WikiLeaks released 86 telephone intercept recordings of Peruvian politicians and
businessmen involved in the 2008 Peru oil scandal.[122] In February, WikiLeaks released
6,780 Congressional Research Service reports[123] followed in March by a list of contributors to
the Norm Coleman senatorial campaign[124][125] and a set of documents belonging to Barclays
Bank that had been ordered removed from the website of The Guardian.[126] In July, it released a
report relating to a serious nuclear accident that had occurred at the Iranian Natanz nuclear facility in
2009.[127] Later media reports have suggested that the accident was related to the Stuxnet computer
worm.[128][129] In September, internal documents from Kaupthing Bank were leaked, from shortly
before the collapse of Iceland's banking sector, which led to the 20082012 Icelandic financial crisis.
The document shows that suspiciously large sums of money were loaned to various owners of the
bank, and large debts written off.[130] In October, Joint Services Protocol 440, a British document
advising the security services on how to avoid documents being leaked, was published by
39
WikiLeaks.[131] Later that month, it announced that a super-injunction was being used by the
commodities company Trafigura to gag The Guardian (London) from reporting on a leaked internal
document regarding a toxic dumping incident in Cte d'Ivoire.[132][133] In November, it hosted
copies of e-mail correspondence between climate scientists, although they were not originally leaked to
WikiLeaks.[134][135] It also released 570,000 intercepts of pager messages sent on the day of the 11
September attacks.[136] During 2008 and 2009, WikiLeaks published the alleged lists of forbidden or
illegal web addresses for Australia, Denmark and Thailand. These were originally created to prevent
access to child pornography and terrorism, but the leaks revealed that other sites covering unrelated
subjects were also listed.[137][138][139]
[edit]2010
In mid-February 2010, WikiLeaks received a diplomatic cable from the US Embassy in Reykjavik
relating to the Icesave scandal, which they published on 18 February.[140] The cable, known
as Reykjavik 13 was the first of the classified documents WikiLeaks published among those allegedly
provided to them by US Army Private Bradley Manning. In March 2010, WikiLeaks released a secret
32-page U.S. Department of Defense Counterintelligence Analysis Report written in March 2008
discussing the leaking of material by WikiLeaks and how it could be deterred.[141][142][143] In
April, a classified video of the 12 July 2007 Baghdad airstrike was released, showing
two Reuters employees being fired at, after the pilots mistakenly thought the men were carrying
weapons, which were in fact cameras.[144] In the week following the release, "wikileaks" was the
search term with the most significant growth worldwide in the last seven days as measured
by Google Insights.[145] In June 2010, Manning was arrested after alleged chat logs were turned in to
the authorities by former hacker Adrian Lamo, in whom he had confided. Manning reportedly told
Lamo he had leaked the "Collateral Murder" video, in addition to a video of the Granai airstrike and
around 260,000 diplomatic cables, to WikiLeaks.[146] In July, WikiLeaks released 92,000
documents related to the war in Afghanistan between 2004 and the end of 2009 to The Guardian, The
New York Times and Der Spiegel. The documents detail individual incidents including friendly
fire and civilian casualties.[147] At the end of July, a 1.4 GB "insurance file" was added to the Afghan
War Diary page, whose decryption details would be released if WikiLeaks or Assange were
harmed.[88] About 15,000 of the 92,000 documents have not yet been released on WikiLeaks, as the
group is currently reviewing the documents to remove some of the sources of the information.
WikiLeaks asked the Pentagon and human-rights groups to help remove names from the documents to
reduce the potential harm caused by their release, but did not receive assistance.[148] Following
the Love Parade stampede in Duisburg, Germany, on 24 July 2010, a local resident published internal
documents of the city administration regarding the planning of Love Parade. The city government
reacted by securing a court order on 16 August forcing the removal of the documents from the site on
which it was hosted.[149] On 20 August 2010, WikiLeaks released a publication entitled Loveparade
2010 Duisburg planning documents, 20072010, which comprised 43 internal documents regarding the
Love Parade 2010.[150][151]Following on from the leak of information from the Afghan War, in
October 2010, around 400,000 documents relating to the Iraq War were released. The BBC quoted The
Pentagonreferring to the Iraq War Logs as "the largest leak of classified documents in its history."
Media coverage of the leaked documents focused on claims that the U.S. government had ignored
reports of torture by the Iraqi authorities during the period after the 2003 war.[152]
[edit]Diplomatic cables release
Main articles: United States diplomatic cables leak, contents, and reactions
On 28 November 2010, WikiLeaks and five major newspapers from Spain (El Pas), France (Le
Monde), Germany (Der Spiegel), the United Kingdom (The Guardian), and the United States (The
New York Times) started to simultaneously publish the first 220 of 251,287 leaked confidential but
not top-secret diplomatic cables from 274 US embassies around the world, dated from 28 December
40
1966 to 28 February 2010.[153][154] WikiLeaks plans to release the entirety of the cables in phases
over several months.[154]
The contents of the diplomatic cables include numerous unguarded comments and revelations
regarding: critiques and praises about the host countries of various US embassies; political
manoeuvring regarding climate change; discussion and resolutions towards ending ongoing tension in
the Middle East; efforts and resistance towards nuclear disarmament; actions in the War on Terror;
assessments of other threats around the world; dealings between various countries;
US intelligence and counterintelligence efforts; and other diplomatic actions. Reactions to the United
States diplomatic cables leak varied. On 14 December 2010 the United States Department of
Justice issued a subpoena directing Twitter to provide information for accounts registered to or
associated with WikiLeaks.[155] Twitter decided to notify its users.[156] The overthrow of the
presidency in Tunisia has been attributed in part to reaction against the corruption revealed by leaked
cables.[157][158][159]
[edit]201112
Main articles: Guantanamo Bay files leak, Global Intelligence Files leak, Syria Files, and Detainee
Policies
In late April 2011, files related to the Guantanamo prison were released.[160] In December 2011,
WikiLeaks started to release the Spy Files.[161] On 27 February 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing
more than five million emails from the Texas-headquartered "global intelligence"
company Stratfor.[162]
On 5 July 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing the Syria Files, more than two million emails from
Syrian political figures, ministries and associated companies, dating from August 2006 to March
2012.[163]
On Thursday, 25 October 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Detainee Policies, more than 100
classified or otherwise restricted files from the United States Department of Defense covering the rules
and procedures for detainees in U.S. military custody.[164]
[edit]Announcements of upcoming leaks
In May 2010, WikiLeaks said it had video footage of a massacre of civilians in Afghanistan by the US
military which they were preparing to release.[165][166]
In an interview with Chris Anderson on 19 July 2010, Assange showed a document WikiLeaks had on
an Albanian oil-well blowout, and said they also had material from insideBP,[167] and that they were
"getting enormous quantity of whistle-blower disclosures of a very high calibre" but added that they
had not been able to verify and release the material because they did not have enough volunteer
journalists.[168]
In October 2010, Assange told a leading Moscow newspaper that "The Kremlin had better brace itself
for a coming wave of WikiLeaks disclosures about Russia".[169][170] Assange later clarified: "we
have material on many businesses and governments, including in Russia. It's not right to say there's
going to be a particular focus on Russia".[171]
In a 2009 Computerworld interview, Assange claimed to be in possession of "5GB from Bank of
America". In 2010, he told Forbes magazine that WikiLeaks was planning another "megaleak" early in
2011, from inside the private sector, involving "a big U.S. bank" and revealing an "ecosystem of
corruption". Bank of America's stock price fell by 3% as a result of this
announcement.[172][173] Assange commented on the possible impact of the release that "it could take
down a bank or two."[174][175] In August 2011, Reuters announced thatDaniel Domscheit-Berg had
destroyed approximately 5GB of data cache from Bank of America, that Assange had under his
control.[176]
In December 2010, Assange's lawyer, Mark Stephens, told The Andrew Marr Show on BBC
Television that WikiLeaks had information it considered to be a "thermo-nuclear device" which it
would release if the organisation needs to defend itself against the authorities.[177]
41
In January 2011, Rudolf Elmer, a former Swiss banker, passed on data containing account details of
2,000 prominent people to Assange, who stated that the information will be vetted before being made
publicly available at a later date.[178]
[edit]Backlash and pressure
A truck bearing a slogan and WikiLeaks logo as a prop at the Occupy Wall Streetprotest in New York
on 25 September 2011.
[edit]Operational challenges
Assange has acknowledged that the practice of posting largely unfiltered classified information online
could one day lead the website to have "blood on our hands."[24][179] He expressed the view that the
potential to save lives, however, outweighs the danger to innocents.[180] Furthermore, WikiLeaks has
highlighted independent investigations which have failed to find any evidence of civilians harmed as a
result of WikiLeaks' activities.[181][182] A surveillance-resistant social network, Friends of
WikiLeaks (FoWL), was launched by supporters of the organization in May 2012 to perform
advocacy.[183][184][185]
[edit]Response from media
Chinese journalist Shi Tao was sentenced to 10 years in 2005 after publicising an email from Chinese
officials about the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre.[186] An article in The New
Yorker said:
One of the WikiLeaks activists owned a server that was being used as a node for the Tor network.
Millions of secret transmissions passed through it. The activist noticed that hackers from China were
using the network to gather foreign governments information, and began to record this traffic. Only a
small fraction has ever been posted on WikiLeaks, but the initial tranche served as the site's
foundation, and Assange was able to say, "[w]e have received over one million documents from
thirteen countries."[24][187]
Assange responded to the suggestion that eavesdropping on Chinese hackers played a crucial part in
the early days of WikiLeaks by saying "the imputation is incorrect. The facts concern a 2006
investigation into Chinese espionage one of our contacts was involved in. Somewhere between none
and handful of those documents were ever released on WikiLeaks. Non-government targets of the
Chinese espionage, such as Tibetan associations were informed (by us)".[188]
[edit]Response from governments
[edit]Australia
On 16 March 2009, the Australian Communications and Media Authority added WikiLeaks to their
proposed blacklist of sites that will be blocked for all Australians if the mandatory internet filtering
scheme is implemented as planned.[189][190] The blacklisting had been removed by 29 November
2010.[191]
[edit]People's Republic of China
42
The WikiLeaks website claims that the government of the People's Republic of China has attempted to
block all traffic to web sites with "wikileaks" in the URL since 2007, but that this can be bypassed
through encrypted connections or by using one of WikiLeaks' many covert URLs.[192]
[edit]Germany
The home of Theodor Reppe, registrant of the German WikiLeaks domain name, wikileaks.de, was
raided on 24 March 2009 after WikiLeaks released the Australian Communications and Media
Authority (ACMA) censorship blacklist.[193] The site was not affected.[194][195]
[edit]Iceland
After the release of the 2007 Baghdad airstrikes video and as they prepared to release film of
the Granai airstrike, Julian Assange has said that his group of volunteers came under intense
surveillance. In an interview and Twitter posts he said that a restaurant in Reykjavk where his group
of volunteers met came under surveillance in March; that there was "covert following and hidden
photography" by police and foreign intelligence services; that an apparent British intelligence agent
made thinly veiled threats in a Luxembourg car park; and that one of the volunteers was detained by
police for 21 hours. Another volunteer posted that computers were seized, saying "If anything happens
to us, you know why ... and you know who is responsible."[196] According to the Columbia
Journalism Review, "the Icelandic press took a look at Assanges charges of being surveilled in Iceland
[...] and, at best, have found nothing to substantiate them."[197]
In August 2009, Kaupthing Bank secured a court order preventing Iceland's national
broadcaster, RV, from broadcasting a risk analysis report showing the bank's substantial exposure to
debt default risk. This information had been leaked by a whistleblower to WikiLeaks and remained
available on the WikiLeaks site; faced with an injunction minutes before broadcast, the channel ran
with a screen grab of the WikiLeaks site instead of the scheduled piece on the bank. Citizens of Iceland
were reported to be outraged that RV was prevented from broadcasting news of
relevance.[198] Therefore, WikiLeaks has been credited with inspiring the Icelandic Modern Media
Initiative, a bill meant to reclaim Iceland's 2007 Reporters Without Borders (Reporters sans
frontires) ranking as first in the world for free speech. It aims to enact a range of protections for
sources, journalists, and publishers.[199][200] Birgitta Jnsdttir, a former WikiLeaks volunteer and
member of the Icelandic parliament, is the chief sponsor of the proposal.
[edit]Thailand
The Centre for the Resolution of the Emergency Situation (CRES) is currently censoring the
WikiLeaks website in Thailand[201] and more than 40,000 other webpages[202] because of the
emergency decree declared in Thailand at the beginning of April 2010 as a result of political
instabilities.[203]
[edit]United States
On 17 July 2010, Jacob Appelbaum spoke on behalf of WikiLeaks at the Hackers on Planet
Earth conference in New York City, replacing Assange because of the presence of federal agents at the
conference.[204][205] He announced that the WikiLeaks submission system was again up and running,
after it had been temporarily suspended.[204][206][207]Assange was a surprise speaker at a TED
conference on 19 July 2010 in Oxford, and confirmed that the site had begun accepting submissions
again.[167]
Upon returning to the US from the Netherlands, on 29 July, Appelbaum was detained for three hours at
the airport by US agents, according to anonymous sources.[208] The sources told Cnet that
Appelbaum's bag was searched, receipts from his bag were photocopied, and his laptop was inspected,
although in what manner was unclear.[208] Appelbaum reportedly refused to answer questions without
a lawyer present, and was not allowed to make a phone call. His three mobile phones were reportedly
taken and not returned.[208]On 31 July, he spoke at a Defcon conference and mentioned his phone
being "seized". After speaking, he was approached by two FBI agents and questioned.[208]
43
wikileaks.org address had led to the site surviving via the so-called Streisand effect, whereby attempts
to censor information online leads to it being replicated in many places.[233]
On 3 December, PayPal, the payment processor owned by eBay, permanently cut off the account of
the Wau Holland Foundation that had been redirecting donations to WikiLeaks. PayPal alleged that the
account violated its "Acceptable Use Policy", specifically that the account was used for "activities that
encourage, promote, facilitate or instruct others to engage in illegal activity."[234][235] The Vice
President of PayPal later stated that they stopped accepting payments after the "State Department told
us these were illegal activities. It was straightforward." Later the same day, he said that his previous
statement was incorrect, and that it was in fact based on a letter from the State Department to
WikiLeaks.[236]On 8 December 2010, the Wau Holland Foundation released a press statement, saying
it has filed a legal action against PayPal for blocking its account used for WikiLeaks payments and for
libel due to PayPal's allegations of "illegal activity".[237]
On 6 December, the Swiss bank PostFinance announced that it had frozen the assets of Assange that it
holds, totalling 31,000. In a statement on its website, it stated that this was because Assange
"provided false information regarding his place of residence" when opening the
account.[238] WikiLeaks released a statement saying this was because Assange, "as a homeless
refugee attempting to gain residency in Switzerland, had used his lawyer's address in Geneva for the
bank's correspondence".[239]
On the same day, MasterCard announced that it was "taking action to ensure that WikiLeaks can no
longer accept MasterCard-branded products", adding "MasterCard rules prohibit customers from
directly or indirectly engaging in or facilitating any action that is illegal."[240] The next day, Visa
Inc. announced it was suspending payments to WikiLeaks, pending "further investigations".[241] In a
move of support for WikiLeaks, XIPWIRE established a way to donate to WikiLeaks, and waived their
fees.[242] Datacell, the Icelandic-based IT company under swiss control that enabled WikiLeaks to
accept credit card donations, announced that it would take legal action against Visa Europe and
Mastercard, in order to resume allowing payments to the website.[243]
On 7 December 2010, The Guardian stated that people could donate to WikiLeaks
via Commerzbank in Kassel, Germany, or Landsbanki in Iceland, or by post to a post office box at
the University of Melbourne or at the wikileaks.ch domain.[244]
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay stated that Visa, Mastercard, and Amazon
may be "violating WikiLeaks' right to freedom of expression" by withdrawing their services.[245]
On 21 December, media reported that Apple had removed an application from its App Store, which
provided access to the embassy cable leaks.[246]
As part of its 'Initial Assessments Pursuant to ... WikiLeaks', the US Presidential Executive Office has
issued a memorandum to the heads of Executive Departments and Agencies asking whether they have
an 'insider threat program'.[247][248]
On 14 July 2011 WikiLeaks and DataCell ehf. of Iceland filed a complaint against the international
card companies, VISA Europe and MasterCard Europe, for infringement of the antitrust rules of the
EU, in response to their withdrawal of financial services to the organisation. In a joint press release, the
organisations stated: "The closure by VISA Europe and MasterCard of Datcells access to the payment
card networks in order to stop donations to WikiLeaks violates the competition rules of the European
Community."[249]DataCell filed a compaint[250] with the European Commission on 14 July 2011.
[edit]Response from the financial industry
Since the publications of CableGate, WikiLeaks has faced an unprecedented global financial blockade
by major finance companies including Mastercard, Visa and PayPal although there has been no legal
accusation of any wrongdoing.
In October 2010, it was reported that Moneybookers, which collected donations for WikiLeaks, had
ended its relationship with the site. Moneybookers stated that its decision had been made "to comply
45
[edit]Defections
Within WikiLeaks, there has been public disagreement between founder and spokesperson Julian
Assange and Daniel Domscheit-Berg, the site's former German representative who was suspended by
Assange. Domscheit-Berg announced on 28 September 2010 that he was leaving the organisation due
to internal conflicts over management of the site.[94][260][261]
Julian Assange (left) with Daniel Domscheit-Berg. Domscheit-Berg was ejected from WikiLeaks and
started a rivalwhistleblower organisation named OpenLeaks.
On 25 September 2010, after being suspended by Assange for "disloyalty, insubordination and
destabilization", Daniel Domscheit-Berg, the German spokesman for WikiLeaks, told Der Spiegel that
he was resigning, saying "WikiLeaks has a structural problem. I no longer want to take responsibility
for it, and that's why I am leaving the project".[262][263][264] Assange accused Domscheit-Berg of
leaking information to Newsweek, claiming the WikiLeaks team was unhappy with Assange's
leadership and handling of the Afghan wardocument releases.[264] Domscheit-Berg left with a small
group to start OpenLeaks.com, a new leak organisation and website with a different management and
distribution philosophy.[262][265]
While leaving, Daniel Domscheit-Berg copied and then deleted roughly 3,500 unpublished documents
from the WikiLeaks servers,[266]including information on the US government's 'no-fly list' and inside
information from 20 right wing organizations, and according to a WikiLeaks statement, 5 gigabytes of
data relating to Bank of America, the internal communications of 20 neo-Nazi organisations and US
intercept information for "over a hundred internet companies."[267] In Domscheit-Berg's book he
wrote: "To this day, we are waiting for Julian to restore security, so that we can return the material to
him, which was on the submission platform".[268] In August 2011, Domscheit-Berg permanently
deleted the files for which he claimed "in order to ensure that the sources are not compromised".[269]
Herbert Snorrason, a 25-year old Icelandic university student, resigned after he challenged Assange on
his decision to suspend Domscheit-Berg and was bluntly rebuked.[264] Iceland MP Birgitta
Jnsdttir also left WikiLeaks, citing lack of transparency, lack of structure, and poor communication
flow in the organisation.[270] According to The Independent (London), at least a dozen key supporters
of WikiLeaks left the website in 2010.[271]
[edit]Reception
47
Graffiti in Bilbao.
Main article: Reception of WikiLeaks
WikiLeaks has received praise as well as criticism. The organisation has won a number of awards,
including The Economist's New Media Award in 2008 at the Index on Censorship
Awards[272] and Amnesty International's UK Media Award in 2009.[273][274] In 2010, the New
York Daily News listed WikiLeaks first among websites "that could totally change the
news",[275] and Julian Assange received the Sam Adams Award[276] and was named the Readers'
Choice for TIME's Person of the Year in 2010.[277] The UK Information Commissionerhas stated that
"WikiLeaks is part of the phenomenon of the online, empowered citizen".[278] In its first days,
an Internet petition calling for the cessation of extra-judicial intimidation of WikiLeaks attracted over
six hundred thousand signatures.[279] Supporters of WikiLeaks in the media and academia have
commended it for exposing state and corporate secrets, increasing transparency, supporting freedom of
the press, and enhancing democratic discourse while challenging powerful
institutions.[280][281][282][283][284][285][286]
At the same time, several U.S. government officials have criticized WikiLeaks for exposing classified
information and claimed that the leaks harm national security and compromise international
diplomacy.[287][288][289][290][291] Several human rights organisations requested with respect to
earlier document releases that WikiLeaks adequately redact the names of civilians working with
international forces, in order to prevent repercussions.[292] Some journalists have likewise criticised a
perceived lack of editorial discretion when releasing thousands of documents at once and without
sufficient analysis.[293] In response to some of the negative reaction, the UN High Commissioner for
Human Rights has expressed her concern over the "cyber war" against WikiLeaks,[294] and in a joint
statement with the Organization of American States the UN Special Rapporteur has called on states
and other actors to keep international legal principles in mind.[295] According to journalist Catherine
A. Fitzpatrick, WikiLeaks is motivated by "a theory of anarchy," not a theory of journalism or social
activism.[296]
[edit]Spin-offs
Release of US diplomatic cables was followed by the creation of a number of other organisations based
on the WikiLeaks model.[297]
48
OpenLeaks was created by a former WikiLeaks spokesperson. Daniel Domscheit-Berg said the
intention was to be more transparent than WikiLeaks. OpenLeaks was supposed to start public
operations in early 2011 but despite much media coverage it is still not functioning.
In December 2011, Wikileaks launched Friends of Wikileaks, a social network for supporters and
founders of the platform.[298]
Brussels Leaks was focused on the European Union as a collaborative effort of media professionals
and activists that sought to "pull the shady inner workings of the EU system out into the public
domain. This is about getting important information out there, not about Brusselsleaks [or any other
'leaks' for that matter]."
TradeLeaks was created to "do to trade and commerce what WikiLeaks has done to politics." It was
founded by Australian Ruslan Kogan. Its goal is to ensure "individuals and businesses should attain
values from others through mutually beneficial and fully consensual trade, rather than force, fraud or
deception." Unfortunately the site itself appears to have become discounted by its users, as evidenced
by the highest rated article being "Tradeleaks tampering with leak vote count mechanism".
Balkan Leaks was founded by Bulgarian Atanas Chobanov in order to make the Balkans more
transparent and to fight corruption as "There are plenty of people out there that want to change the
Balkans for good and are ready to take on the challenge. We're offering them a hand."
Indoleaks is an Indonesian site that seeks to publish classified documents primarily from the
Indonesian government.
RuLeaks is aimed at being a Russian equivalent to WikiLeaks. It was originally launched to provide
translated versions of the WikiLeaks cables but the Moscow Times reports it has started to publish its
own content as well.[299]
PPLeaks and PSOELeaks are related to the Spanish Partido Popular and PSOE leaks and scandals.
Leakymails is a project designed to obtain and publish relevant documents exposing corruption of the
political class and the powerful in Argentina.[300][301][302]
Honest Appalachia,[303] launched in January 2012, is a website based in the United States which
hopes to reach out to potential whistleblowers in West Virginia, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio,
Kentucky, Tennessee and North Carolina, and serve as a replicable model for similar projects
elsewhere.[304][305]
49
From: lawmen@googlegroups.com
[mailto:lawmen@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bob Hurt
Sent:
Tuesday, March 23, 2010 4:16 AM
To: 'Lawmen'
Subject:
[Lawmen: 3525] Attorney Brad Henschel on becoming an attorney and the practice of law
I thought you might appreciate this attorneys perspective on the practice of law and what it takes to
become an attorney.
Bob Hurt
50
?
They are mainly the antithesis of real world ethics. Clients think a bar complaint will force the attorney
to be
better. Richard Fine was disbarred after exposing judicial corruption of the highest order.
The Bar and the legislature covered it up.
51
52
So why do you seek to excoriate them with colossally unfair generalizations like those in your obloquy
below? Methinks thou doth protest too much. Way too.
Licensing.
Furthermore, you err in your pronouncements about licensing. The Constitution of Florida in Article V
Section 15 empowers the Supreme Court to regulate the practice of law: The supreme court shall have
exclusive jurisdiction to regulate the admission of persons to the practice of law and the discipline of
persons admitted. It integrated the bar in 1949 partly for that purpose. It has established,
through the bar, rules for an independent examiner to determine the qualifications of applicants for
membership. Upon successful qualification, the bar issues a bar number and card to the new member,
and the Supreme Court clerk issues the LICENSE as attorney and counselor at law which the new
attorney typically frames and hangs on the wall in the law office. You have seen many of these
licenses, and if you visit the Florida Bar web site you will find the bar number (the equivalent of the
license number) for every attorney and jurist bar member in Florida.
A Note about Smart People.
You seem to imply that smart people (like most attorneys) screw other people (the relatively stupid, I
presume). You fail to note that in many, if not most, cases a screwing simply cannot be helped. Should
a teacher grind the education of a classroom of students to a snails pace in order to accommodate the
stupid children in the classroom? Before busing that did not present much of a problem
because smart people generally lived in different school districts from stupid people, owing to their
relative abilities to buy nice houses in nice neighborhoods. Now, after busing, schools have honors
classes to segregate the smart from the stupid. No matter what, stupid kids dont end up with as good
an education as smart kids for the same reason that a pint jar cannot hold the amount of water that a
quart jar can hold: inherent capacities simply cannot be exceeded.
So, naturally, smart people generally exhibit more sense in managing money and their other affairs,
and that can make them seem to take advantage of stupid people, particularly in a free-enterprise
capitalist economic system. OUR particular system has in the past 100 years become burdened with
thousands of laws and regulations that protect the stupid from the smart and the weak from the strong.
But at the same time, our nations states have eliminated every vestige of eugenics laws that might
eventually have obviated those protectionist laws. What do I mean here? Our land needs fewer stupid
people in it, by at least an order of magnitude. Then caveat emptor wont seem like such a dirty term
because far fewer people will seem screwed. And I mean that everybody, not just attorneys, need to
learn the equivalent of the first two years of law school in their public education.
Legitimate Complaints, with Solutions. Regardless of the licensing issue, you dont have a valid
point to make in your anti-lawyer tirade, even though you could make some very valid points. Please
allow me to make some of them for you:
1.
Bar
Integration Destroys Republic.
a.
The integration of the bar with the Supreme court makes every bar member a member
of the Judicial Branch of government. The Florida Constitution requires in Article II
Section 3 that The powers of the state government shall be divided into legislative,
executive and judicial branches. No person belonging to one branch shall exercise any
53
powers
appertaining to either of the other branches unless expressly provided
herein. It does not permit bar members outside the judiciary except as Attorney
General and State Attorneys and their assistant attorneys. All legislator attorneys and
staff attorneys in the Legislative and Executive branches operate in violation of the
Constitution and to that extent create a judicial oligarchy because the Supreme Court
can and does exercise dominion over all of them. That violates CUSA Article IV
Section 4 which provides in pertinent part The United States shall guarantee to every
State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.
b.
Solution: de-integrate the bar and turn the regulation of the practice of law over to the
Executive branch.
2.
Attorneys dont regulate judges, but tolerate judicial immunity.
a.
Attorneys form the pool from which judges rise to office, and so attorneys comprise the group best
suited to lead in judicial reform for eliminating judicial corruption. They have the requisite skills and
the proximity to judges, so they know better than any public other than victims of corruption which
jurists have become corrupt or downright evil. They have let the people down because they dont use
their bar to police the judiciary. In case you havent noticed, the bar governors and grievance
committees ignore grievances against jurists. But they can and should work to revoke the bar licenses
of corrupt judges, for that would disqualify the judges from office (the state constitutions typically
make bar membership a qualification for becoming a jurist). Many attorneys fail to hold the courts
accountable or engage in guerilla activism against crooked judges. By guerilla I mean a form of
activism like hiring a Private Investigator to dig up the dirt on a judge, and then hiring a Public
Relations agency to expose that dirt to the press and the public through blogs, etc, without the attorney
coming under fire for bring disrepute to the profession.
b.
Solution:
litigate and lobby against judicial immunity and for empowerment and independence of grand juries to
investigate government employee crimes.
3.
Unfair
Business Practices.
a.
Some law firms overcharge for services rendered and overbill clients by charging for
services not rendered. Some attorneys suffer from incompetence or laziness and dont
give clients their best effort at advocacy. As a consequence, many people who need
advocacy simply cannot afford the service, and of those who manage to afford it, many
dont get adequate advocacy, and lose the case as a result. Pro bono work does not
balance this out. The bar seems to turn a blind eye to much of this, and the public has
no clue whether the attorney for hire will do a good job or not.
54
b.
Solution:
Lobby for laws to require attorneys to give clients satisfaction questionnaires and make
the results public.
4.
Legal
Services Monopoly.
a.
Attorneys seem loathe to campaign against the unfair Unlicensed Practice of Law
statutes with which the bar and state attorneys attack private citizens who help one
another with legal matters. They have helped create a legal services monopoly that has
led to their overcharging for legal services. Attorneys really should become leaders in
the communities of their residence, guiding people in ways to keep our governments
constitutional. Many dont seem to participate nearly to the extent they should or could.
b.
Solution:
Lobby for change in UPL to apply only to specifically defined activities that actually
require knowledge gained in law school or other special certification.
The law should allow anybody to practice an area of law upon a demonstration of
competent knowledge in that area.
You
have probably noticed that I offered solutions to each problem. Lawyers cannot implement three of the
solutions by themselves. They need public support. You could help educate the public about their need
to provide that support. You could encourage attorneys to do the lobbying.
Many Attorneys Deserve Our Appreciation. Bottom
line, instead of flaying the flesh off the stooped backs of overworked Patriot Attorneys, you ought to
bless them for their general goodness and generosity, and encourage more to join their ranks and help
them excise and bring to justice crooked judges and over-zealous prosecutors.
What law professionals do you know who have created web sites and led movements to educate
patriots in the law and constitutional principles, and to mobilize people to effective political activism?
Can you name any? I can name three:
1.
Larry Becraft
http://hiwaay.net/~becraft - for at least 20 years, Larry has at some expense hosted a web site that
does not sell his legal services, but educates people in the law and guides patriots away from harmful
myths that will land them in prison, and guides students toward sound principles of economics.
Larry spent hundreds of hours scanning and converting to searchable text the Statutes at Large for the
income tax laws and the related Code of Federal Regulations, put them on DVDs, and makes them
available via the web and on disk to serious students. He operates a radio show at his own expense
weekly to educate people about tax issues and patriot myths, encouraging people to learn and use the
law, and participate in honest government.
55
2.
Tom Cryer
http://truthattack.org
for the past 2+ years, Tommy has led patriots in attacking the errors of the IRS, making a public,
political issue of those errors (such as the Stop Thief rallies at post offices at tax time) and educating
people about income tax laws and issues. He has posted all of Larrys searchable laws and codes on his
web site, making them freely available to everyone. He co-hosts the radio show with Larry, as a public
service, free.
3.
Jon Roland
http://constitution.org
Jon does not practice as an attorney, but as an educator and law philosopher he devotes his life to
helping our governments adhere to the Constitution and our people become better Citizens. He
interacts with many attorneys and leaders in the Patriot movement to encourage people to become
activists in reforming our government and courts. His web site constitutes a treasure trove of related
educational information, including Larrys searchable laws.
I love these men. I invoke Gods most precious blessings upon them. I honor them for their devotion to
truth and their selfless contributions to our nations underlying greatness. I dont examine them under a
microscope for their peccadilloes, vices, and sins. I dont expect perfection of them. But, I do
encourage them toward whatever perfection they can achieve in their short lives on this whirling rock.
I encourage you to do the same.
Bob Hurt
56
*** Note****
I looked into it further to find that Richard Fine was not only dismissed from the Bar, but put behind
bars and has been in solitary confinement for over 18 months now without charges laid against him
presumably holding him there until the Bilderberg New World Order is in place having been meeting
since 1954 began their initiative in 2007 with the world financial collapse that we ain't seen nothing
yet.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine/
Please join the Facebook Cause: FREE THE LA-FIPs (Los Angeles
Falsely Imprisoned Persons)
http://www.causes.com/causes/222335/about
INTRODUCTION - MULTI-IDIOMAS
English Intro:
Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had
taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of
California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two
weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held
ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing
was ever entered in his case.
Richard Fine attempted to have his habeas corpus reviewed by the United States courts, from the US
District Court, through the US Court of Appeals, to the Supreme Court of the United States; however,
all United States courts involved in the matter denied Richard
DOCUMENTS
The two records below, produced by the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, and by
the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department as the legal foundation for the holding of Richard Fine
are alleged as fraud, each on its own. Moreover, the production of contradictory records by the two
justice system agencies of Los Angeles County is alleged as additional fraud to top it off.
1) View the FALSE AND DELIBERATELY MISLEADING records provided by Sheriff Lee Baca in
letter to Los Angeles County Supervisor, Michael Antonovich, in response to request for access to the
California public records that were the non-existing warrant and booking records of Richard Fine. For
over a year, Sheriff Lee Baca insists on providing false records - claiming that Richard Fine was
arrested on location and by authority of the "San Pedro Municipal Court". No such court has existed
for almost a decade:
http://inproperinla.com/10-01-08-antonovich-ltr-repeat-mailing-w-attch-env-s.pdf
2) View the FALSE ON ITS FACE March 4, 2009 Judgment and Order of Contempt. Such judgment
record is missing any authentication at all. It was stamped on its face "FILED" with the date of March
4, 2009, but signed on its last page by Judge Yaffe and dated March 24, 2009. Such judgment was
never entered as required by California Code to make it "effectual for any purpose":
57
http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-marina-v-county-09-03-04-false-fine-judment-record-copyfrom-us-dist-ct-habeas-corpus-doc-16-response-by-la-sup-ct-filed-may-1-2009.pdf
MISSING DOCUMENTS
The case of Richard Fine documented a pattern of publication of false records in online public access
systems, and denial of access to or missing true judicial records:
1) The Los Angeles Superior Court in Marina v LA County (BS109420) published a false online
"Case Summary", but denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in the case
management system of the court.
2) The Sheriff of Los Angeles County in re: Richard I Fine, (Inmate #1824367) published false
online arrest and booking records in its "Inmate Information Center", but denied access to the true Los
Angeles County Booking Record of Inmate Richard Fine.
3) The US District Court, Los Angeles in Fine v Baca (2:09-cv-01914) published a false online
"PACER docket", which the Clerk of the Court refuses to certify, but denied access to the NEFs
(Notices of Electronic Filing - the authentication records) in the case, and to the paper record, which
was Richard Fine's commencing record - the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which was allegedly
adulterated at the US District Court.
4) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit in Fine v Sheriff (09-71692) and Fine v Sheriff (09-56073)
published false online "PACER dockets", but denied access to the NDAs
(Notices of Docket Activity - the authentication records), and also to critical records filed by
respondents in the appeal.
5) The US Supreme Court in Fine v Baca (09-A827)
published a false online "docket" noting denials on both March 12, 2010 and April 23/26, 2010, which
were not supported by the Court records in the case. Any evidence of valid judicial review of the
Application was missing from the Court file.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35193676/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34940014/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34834530/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35014599/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35149271/
COMPLAINTS
Below are links to two complaints filed with the office of US Attorney, Central District of California for public corruption and deprivation of rights in the case of Richard Fine:
58
1) View complaint filed with US Attorney Office, alleging public corruption and deprivation of rights
by the California Judicial Council and California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George, relative
to their conduct in the habeas corpus at the US District Court:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33879469/
2) View the Complaint filed July 8, 2010 against Judge David Yaffe and Sheriff Lee Baca - for Public
Corruption and Deprivation of Rights in re: Imprisonment of Richard Fine:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34057033/
3) View the Complaint filed July 1, 2010, against Counsel Danny Bickell, of the US Supreme Court,
alleging public corruption and deprivation of rights relative to his conduct in the Application Fine v
Baca (09-A827).
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/
PETITION
WE ASK SHERIFF LEE BACA TO USE HIS DUE AUTHORITY AND PROPERLY ADDRESS
THE LEGAL, CIVIL, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF AN AMERICAN, INMATE RICHARD
FINE (CJ INMATE 1824367). WE PRAY SHERIFF LEE BACA REVIEW THE ARREST AND
BOOKING RECORDS, AND IF FOUND NOT CONFORMING WITH THE FUNDAMENTALS OF
THE LAW - INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND IMMEDIATELY RELEASE ATTORNEY
RICHARD FINE. WITH IT, THE SHERIFF MAY MARK A NEW BEGINNING FOR THE LOS
ANGELES COUNTY JUSTICE SYSTEM, WITH DIGNITY OF THE LEGAL, CIVIL, AND
HUMAN RIGHTS OF ALL...
Executive Summary:
Instant petition is filed with Los Angeles County Sheriff LEE BACA, to use his due authority and
properly address the legal, civil and human rights of an American, inmate RICHARD FINE
(#1824367).
Reconstructed Chronology:
- Prior to the March 4, 2009 proceeding, a request was forwarded by the court of Judge David Yaffe to
the Sheriff Department to have the Warrant Detail present in the proceeding, with the understanding
that the proceeding would end with the sentencing and jailing of Attorney Richard Fine for contempt.
- On March 4, 2009 Judge David Yaffe indeed pronounced such sentence in open court, as evidenced
in the Court Reporter's transcript. Through such oral directives, Judge Yaffe misled the Sheriff's
Warrant Detail to arrest Attorney Richard Fine at 11:05 am - albeit - with no written, valid, and
effectual warrant at all.
- On March 4, 2009, at 11:05 am, the Sheriff's Warrant Detail arrested Richard Fine in open court, at
the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, albeit - with no warrant
at all.
- On March 4, 2009 Judge Yaffe then left the courtroom, and likewise - left the Warrant Detail with no
record as an adequate legal foundation for the arrest. Instead, Judge Yaffe proceeded to create a
second, contradictory record in the court file. The court file to this date does not reflect any sentencing
or jailing at all. In fact, the March 4, 2009 proceeding was entirely omitted from the record!
59
- On March 4, 2009, at 12:32 pm, the Sheriff's Warrant Detail, having no record as foundation for the
arrest and jailing, recorded the arrest and booking of Richard Fine as if they had taken place on
location, and pursuant to the authority of the non-existent "San Pedro Municipal Court." Such records
were a false and deliberately misleading records, and out of compliance with the law. They had no
valid court order or judgment as its foundation. No such court had existed for almost a decade! The
false and deliberately misleading booking record is the main subject of instant petition.
- On March 4, 2009, at 4:31 pm, papers were received by the Sheriff's Department through an
anonymous fax transmission, unauthenticated, and with no cover sheet, from "Judicial Services". Such
papers reflected yet a third, again false and deliberately misleading set of retroactive records for the
arrest and booking of Richard Fine. Such records included invalid records: (a) The March 4, 2009
Remand Order and (b) the March 4, 2009 Judgment for contempt.
On such background it was understandable why Sheriff Lee Baca refused to respond to Attorney
Richard Fine's habeas corpus petition, and likewise - why Sheriff Lee Baca has refused to allow access
to the California public records, which are the arrest and booking record of Richard Fine.
Pleading: We pray Sheriff Lee Baca review the arrest and booking records, and if such records are
found failing to conform with the fundamentals of the law - take corrective actions and immediately
release Attorney Richard Fine. With it, the Sheriff may mark a new beginning for the Los Angeles
County justice system, with dignity of the legal, civil, and human rights of
all.
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Jz12345@earthlink.net
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f"
stroked="f">
style='width:201pt;height:103.5pt'>
o:href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_4QooSf0l1yE/S7GNMg5PW6I/AAAAAAAABRQ/sdbzbE4EqpM/
S1600-R/HRA%20Logo.jpg"/>
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human
Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles
County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case
management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United
States.
About
61
62
The quick fall of the Qin Dynasty was attributed to this proscription. Confucianism was revived in
the Han Dynasty that followed, and became the official ideology of the Chinese imperial state. Many
of the other schools had disappeared.
[edit]See also
Book burning
Destruction of Four Olds
Literary Inquisition
Cultural Revolution
[edit]
There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
Benevolence Righteousness and Morality
finally I began to make out what was written between the lines.
The whole volume was but a single phrase,
Eat People
NEWS
Never Ending War Story
NO
Near Over
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_God
The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) teaches that the coming Reign of God will be a kingdom
of love, peace, and justice.[23]
Justice is defined as a virtue whereby one respects the rights of all persons, living in harmony and
equity with all.[24]
The Kingdom of God began with Christ's death and Resurrection and must be further extended by
Christians until it has been brought into perfection by Christ at the end of time.
[25] The Christian does this by living the way Christ lived, by thinking the way Christ thought,[23]
and by promoting peace and justice.[26] This can be accomplished by discerning how the Holy Spirit
(God) is calling one to act in the concrete circumstances of one's life.[26]
Christians must also pray, asking God for what is necessary to cooperate with the coming of God's
Kingdom.
[27] Jesus gathered disciples to be the seed and the beginning of God's Reign on earth, and Jesus sent
the Holy Spirit to guide them.[28] Jesus continues to call all people to come together around him[29]
63
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End_time
While some who believe in the literal interpretation of the Bible insist that the prediction of dates or
times is futile, some other writers believe that Jesus foretold of signs which would indicate that the
"end of days" was near. Some of these signs include earthquakes, natural disasters, civil problems,
"wars and rumors of wars," and other catastrophes. Of the precise time, however, it will come like a
"thief in the night" (1 Thess. 5:2).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resurrection#External_links
Zombies became a popular device in modern horror fiction, largely because of the success of George
A. Romero's 1968 film Night of the Living Dead[17] and they have appeared as plot devices in various
books, films and in television shows. Zombie fiction is now a sizeable sub-genre of horror, usually
describing a breakdown of civilization occurring when most of the population become flesh-eating
zombies a zombie apocalypse.
The monsters are usually hungry for human flesh,
64
PEACE!!!
None Of That in our
ABBY
Ass Back Bereavement Yarn
Hess' attempt to negotiate peace and subsequent lifelong imprisonment have given rise to many theories about his
motivation for flying to Scotland, and conspiracy theories about why he remained imprisoned alone at Spandau, long after
all other convicts had been released.
On 27 September and 28 September 2007, numerous British news services published descriptions of conflict between his
Western and Soviet captors over his treatment and how the Soviet captors were steadfast in denying repeated entreaties for
his release on humanitarian grounds during his last years.[1][2][3][4][5][6]
The preamble to the CPPCG states that instances of genocide have taken place throughout history,[2] but it was not until
Raphael Lemkin coined the term and the prosecution of perpetrators of the Holocaust at the Nuremberg trials that
the United Nations agreed to the CPPCG which defined the crime of genocide under international
law.
There was a gap of more than forty years between the CPPCG coming into force and the first prosecution under the
provisions of the treaty.
To date all international prosecutions of genocide, the Rwandan Genocide and the Srebrenica Genocide, have been by ad
hoc international tribunals.[6]
The International Criminal Court came into existence in 2002 and it has the authority to try people from the states that have
signed the treaty, but to date it has not tried anyone.
Since the CPPCG came into effect in January 1951 about 80 member states of the United Nations have passed legislation
that incorporates the provisions of the CPPCG into their municipal law, and some perpetrators of genocide have been found
guilty under such municipal laws, such as Nikola Jorgic, who was found guilty of genocide in Bosnia by a German court
(Jorgic v. Germany).
"in part"
65
Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious,
or national group.[1]
While a precise definition varies among genocide scholars, a legal definition is found in the 1948
United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
(CPPCG). Article 2 of this convention defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group,
as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction
in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly
transferring children of the group to another group."[2]
Because of the influence of Joseph Stalin,
Another criticism of the CPPCG is that when its provisions have been invoked by the United Nations
Security Council, they have only been invoked to punish those who have already committed genocide
and
1
actions taken to stop genocides before they happen.
Critics of this approach such as Dirk Moses assert that this is unrealistic and that, for example,
666
"Darfur will end when it suits the great powers that have a stake
in the region".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53187051/To-United-Nations
http://www.scribd.com/doc/152839290/Does-This-Mean-WW-III-Before-September
66
If only we had a
COC JIJ
Court of Competent Jurisdiction Independent Judiciary
www.T4J.frank13.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6uFJuho2eo
David Icke - The Reptilians, the Schism, Obama and the New world
Order
67