Lab Report: Criteria Title Level 4 (A) Gives a detailed idea of the experiment using Effect of on 2 /2 Problem Clearly

identifies what is to be determined using How does affect 2 /2 Hypothesis Clearly predicts the outcome of the experiment using If then. Is supported by detailed relevant knowledge using I think because 4 /4 Variables Clearly identifies the independent, dependent and many controlled variables. /4 Materials 4 All resources are identified and quantities are noted. All applicable changes have been noted. 3 /3 Procedure Very detailed and extremely easy to /5 Data follow. 5 4.5 follow. 4

Names: Level 3 (B) Gives a clear idea of the experiment using Effect of on 1.5 Identifies what is to be determined using How does affect 1.5 Somewhat identifies what is to be determined using How does affect 1.5 Level 2 (C) Gives an adequate idea of the experiment using Effect of on 1.5 Level 1 (D) Gives only some idea of the experiment and does not use Effect of on 1 Hardly identifies what is to be determined and does not use How does affect 1

Clearly predicts the outcome of the experiment using If then. Is supported by relevant knowledge using I think because 3.5

Predicts the outcome of the experiment using If then. Is supported by some relevant knowledge using I think because 3

Predicts the outcome of the experiment but does not use If then. Is supported by little relevant knowledge and does not use I think because 2.5 Somewhat clearly identifies the independent, dependent but few controlled variables. 2.5 Some resources are identified but quantities have not been noted. Few applicable changes have been noted. 2

Clearly identifies the independent, dependent and some controlled variables. 3.5 All resources are identified and quantities are noted. Most applicable changes have been noted. 2.5 Clear and easy to

Somewhat clearly identifies the independent, dependent and some controlled variables. 3 Most resources are identified and quantities are noted. Some applicable changes have been noted. 2.5 Somewhat clear and easy to follow. 3.5 Data is mostly correct and displayed using a data table with mostly proper headings and a mostly labeled graph. 3.5

Not clear but are manageable to follow. 3

Data is correct and displayed using a data table with proper headings and a fully labeled graph.

Data is correct and displayed using a data table with proper headings and a mostly labeled graph.

Data is somewhat correct but is poorly displayed either without or with a poorly made data table and an unlabeled

4 /5 Conclusions 5 4.5 Supports or rejects the Hypothesis. The Data has been explained in detail using specific data as evidence. The Problem has been solved. 4.5 4 Some strengths and weaknesses have been identified and some improvements related to better data collection have been suggested. 4.5 4 3.5 Some strengths and weaknesses have been identified but few improvements related to better data collection have been suggested. 3.5 Supports or rejects the Hypothesis. The Data is explained in some detail using data as evidence. The Problem has been solved.

graph. 3 May not support or reject the Hypothesis. The Data is weakly explained using little data as evidence. The Problem may not have been solved. 3 Few strengths and weaknesses have been identified and few (or superficial) improvements related to better data collection have been suggested. 3

Supports or rejects the Hypothesis. The Data is explained in great detail using specific data as evidence. The Problem has been solved. 5

/5 Evaluation

Many strengths and weaknesses have been identified and improvements related to better data collection have been suggested. /5 5 /35

Total: