Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Sister Paula Marie Buley, IHM Executive Vice President for Administration
Benchmark faculty salaries against peer institutions by comparable rank and academic classification.
Comparative Information
1. Market Comparisons
Peer Institutions: Comparable institution criteria: enrollment composition, endowment, US News Rankings, budget, location, tuition dependency, private vs. public funding Confirmed by Executive Cabinet and reviewed by Core Project Group Competitor Institutions: Universities which often vie for the same faculty pool. Competitors different by location, private vs. public, Carnegie or US News Classification
2.
Academic Ranks
Inclusive Analysis Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Instructor Academic Ranks with Separate Analysis Faculty Associates matched to Assistant Professor (22) Senior Faculty Associates matched to Associate Professors (7) Priest Faculty (15) Librarians Faculty (22)
3.
Comparison Markets Peer Schools DePaul University (Chicago, IL) Duquesne University (Pittsburgh, PA) Fordham University (Bronx, NY) Hofstra University (Hempstead, NY) Loyola University Chicago (Chicago, IL) Marquette University (Milwaukee, WI) Northeastern University (Boston, MA) Rutgers University - New Brunswick (New Brunswick, NJ) St. John's University (Jamaica, NY) Saint Louis University (Saint Louis, MO) The Catholic University of America (Washington, DC) University of Dayton (Dayton, OH) University of Saint Thomas (Saint Paul, MN) University of San Diego (Diocesan) (San Diego, CA) University of San Francisco (San Francisco, CA) Competitor Schools Fairfield University (Fairfield, CT) Montclair State University (Upper Montclair, NJ) Providence College (Providence, RI) St. John's University (Jamaica, NY) (repeated from Peer Schools) The College of New Jersey (Ewing, NJ) The University of Scranton (Scranton, PA) University of Delaware (Newark, DE) Villanova University (Villanova, PA)
Aspirational Institutions
Baylor University Boston University Fordham University George Washington University Pepperdine University Southern Methodist University Saint Louis University Syracuse University University of Pittsburgh
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR Years in Rank 0-2 >2-4 >4-6 >6+ Expected Compa-Ratio 0.85 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.15
INSTRUCTOR Years in Rank 0-2 >2-4 >4-6 >6+ Expected Compa-Ratio 0.90 0.95 0.95 1.05 1.05 1.10 > 1.10
Compa Ratio =
10
$$
Compa-Ratio*
<.85 .95
.95 1.05
1.05 >1.15
Step 1: Are salaries distributed appropriately based on years in rank? Step 2: Within years in rank groupings, is salary appropriate relative to performance contribution?
03 years
35 years
5 7+ years
Highly seasoned Meeting teaching, research and service expectations On track for promotion to Associate Professor 11
$$
<.85 .90
.90 .95
.95 1.05
58 years
1.05 1.10
1.10 1.15
>1.15
03 years
35 years
8 10 years
10 12 years
>12 Years
Step 2: Within years in rank groupings, is salary appropriate relative to performance contribution?
Performance/post-tenure review criteria should be used to evaluate appropriate salaries within the context of years in rank
12
$$
Compa-Ratio* Step 1: Are salaries distributed appropriately based on years in rank? Step 2: Within years in rank groupings, is salary appropriate relative to performance contribution?
.90 .95
1.05 1.10
1.10 1.15
>1.15
35 years
8 10 years
10 12 years
>12 Years
Performance/post-tenure review criteria should be used to evaluate appropriate salaries within the context of years in rank
13
INTRODUCTION
Below are descriptions of the information that can be found on each worksheet. CUPA Competitiveness by Rank Summarizes competitive position for each of the four faculty ranks in all disciplines across SHU CUPA Competitiveness by Discipline Details competitive information for each of the thirty-seven disciplines and overall CUPA Individual Exhibit Details competitive information for each faculty member within college, discipline and rank Ordered by discipline, then by increasing rank in increasing time in rank Blended CUPA Discipline Provides further detail for footnote #4 in the CUPA Competitiveness by Disc. Worksheet AAUP Competitiveness Details competitive information for each of the four faculty rank and overall NOTES: - Market data was collected from the competitor and peer institutions; aspirational institutions were excluded from this analysis - Compa-Ratio is the ratio of actual salary to market median. Compa-Ratio = Actual Salary/Market Median A compa-ratio of 1.0 means the actual salary and market median are identical A compa-ratio of less than 1.0 means the actual salary is lower than the market median A compa-ratio of more than 1.0 means the actual salary is higher than the market median - Assumptions about the relationship of salaries to market median were developed as a way to review competitiveness and equity
14
TOTAL
1 2
2 46 86 64 198
1 27 19 2 49
19 36 15 1 71
There is no market data available for 3 Instructors. There is no market data available for one Assistant Professor. 3 There is no market data available for two Professors. ** NOTE: Librarian data was not available in the CUPA faculty survey due to a low response rate.
15
Discipline Accounting Adult Health Nursing Art & Music Asian Studies Biology Chemistry Communication Computing & Decision Science 1 Diplomacy & International Relations Economics Educational Leadership, Management & Policy Educational Studies English Family and Community Health Nursing Finance Grad. Dept. of Public Admin.3 History Legal Studies Management Marketing Mathematics & Computer Science4 Modern Languages Philosophy Physics Political Science Professional Psychology & Family Therapy5 Psychology Religious Studies 6 Sociology and Anthropology Supportive Sciences Health Systems Theology
# Incumbents
Aggregate SH Salary
Aggregate Compa-Ratio
TOTAL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
9 14 11 4 11 11 19 7 10 3 9 20 16 12 7 6 13 3 8 5 15 12 9 4 12 11 13 11 8 11 5 318
$901,201 $813,052 $611,552 $225,962 $653,948 $679,373 $1,156,446 $667,150 $653,438 $227,008 $667,305 $1,341,792 $942,003 $693,670 $642,407 $372,203 $759,933 $280,109 $696,424 $421,528 $940,231 $667,971 $544,197 $229,094 $724,413 $665,141 $738,812 $637,308 $415,397 $695,622 $286,164 $20,580,365
$791,417 $851,652 $727,933 $298,511 $851,167 $885,999 $1,299,213 $692,002 $608,313 $307,710 $749,322 $1,574,308 $1,001,252 $713,002 $620,359 $390,958 $870,218 $324,561 $816,753 $465,813 $1,185,858 $776,932 $613,014 $307,299 $805,106 $784,854 $842,276 $606,505 $523,041 $733,899 $336,238 $23,063,225
1.14 0.95 0.84 0.76 0.77 0.77 0.89 0.96 1.07 0.74 0.89 0.85 0.94 0.97 1.04 0.95 0.87 0.86 0.85 0.90 0.79 0.86 0.89 0.75 0.90 0.85 0.88 1.05 0.79 0.95 0.85 0.89
3 4 11 4 10 9 11 4 0 3 6 17 9 5 3 3 6 2 7 4 15 7 5 4 6 5 11 3 7 4 2 198
0 3 0 0 1 0 6 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 0 2 4 1 0 0 0 4 3 0 3 6 1 3 0 3 1 49
6 7 0 0 0 2 2 2 9 0 2 2 5 6 4 1 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 5 1 4 2 71
33% 29% 100% 100% 91% 82% 58% 57% 0% 100% 67% 85% 56% 42% 43% 50% 46% 67% 88% 80% 100% 58% 56% 100% 50% 45% 85% 27% 88% 36% 40% 62%
0% 21% 0% 0% 9% 0% 32% 14% 10% 0% 11% 5% 13% 8% 0% 33% 31% 33% 0% 0% 0% 33% 33% 0% 25% 55% 8% 27% 0% 27% 20% 15%
67% 50% 0% 0% 0% 18% 11% 29% 90% 0% 22% 10% 31% 50% 57% 17% 23% 0% 13% 20% 0% 8% 11% 0% 25% 0% 8% 45% 13% 36% 40% 22%
There is no market data available for one Instructor. There is no market data available for two Professors and one Assistant Professor. There is no market data for the 51, 51.07 or 44.04 disciplines. Market data used was for the 44 discipline: Public Administration and Social Service Professions. Please see the Blended CUPA Discipline tab for an explanation of the market data used. There is no market data for 51, 51.15 or 42.06 disciplines. Market data used was for the 42 discipline: Psychology. Adjusted by removing There is no market data available for one Instructor. There is no market data available for one Instructor. faculty members
** NOTE: Librarian data was not available in the CUPA faculty survey due to a low response rate.
16
Discipline Accounting Diplomacy & International Relations Religious Studies 6 Finance Family and Community Health Nursing Computing & Decision Science1 Adult Health Nursing Grad. Dept. of Public Admin.3 Supportive Sciences Health Systems English Marketing Political Science Educational Leadership, Management & Policy Communication Philosophy Psychology History Legal Studies Modern Languages Management Educational Studies Theology Professional Psychology & Family Therapy5 Art & Music Sociology and Anthropology Mathematics & Computer Science4 Biology Chemistry Asian Studies Physics Economics
# Incumbents
Aggregate SH Salary
$ Variance
Aggregate Compa-Ratio
TOTAL
1 2
9 10 11 7 12 7 14 6 11 16 5 12 9 19 9 13 13 3 12 8 20 5 11 11 8 15 11 11 4 4 3 318
$901,201 $653,438 $637,308 $642,407 $693,670 $667,150 $813,052 $372,203 $695,622 $942,003 $421,528 $724,413 $667,305 $1,156,446 $544,197 $738,812 $759,933 $280,109 $667,971 $696,424 $1,341,792 $286,164 $665,141 $611,552 $415,397 $940,231 $653,948 $679,373 $225,962 $229,094 $227,008 $20,580,365
$791,417 $608,313 $606,505 $620,359 $713,002 $692,002 $851,652 $390,958 $733,899 $1,001,252 $465,813 $805,106 $749,322 $1,299,213 $613,014 $842,276 $870,218 $324,561 $776,932 $816,753 $1,574,308 $336,238 $784,854 $727,933 $523,041 $1,185,858 $851,167 $885,999 $298,511 $307,299 $307,710 $23,063,225
$109,784 $45,125 $30,803 $22,048 ($19,332) ($24,852) ($38,600) ($18,755) ($38,277) ($59,249) ($44,285) ($80,693) ($82,017) ($142,767) ($68,817) ($103,464) ($110,285) ($44,452) ($108,961) ($120,329) ($232,516) ($50,074) ($119,713) ($116,381) ($107,644) ($245,626) ($197,219) ($206,626) ($72,549) ($78,205) ($80,702) ($2,482,859)
1.14 1.07 1.05 1.04 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.87 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.84 0.79 0.79 0.77 0.77 0.76 0.75 0.74 0.89
3 0 3 3 5 4 4 3 4 9 4 6 6 11 5 11 6 2 7 7 17 2 5 11 7 15 10 9 4 4 3 198
0 1 3 0 1 1 3 2 3 2 0 3 1 6 3 1 4 1 4 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 49
6 9 5 4 6 2 7 1 4 5 1 3 2 2 1 1 3 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 71
33% 0% 27% 43% 42% 57% 29% 50% 36% 56% 80% 50% 67% 58% 56% 85% 46% 67% 58% 88% 85% 40% 45% 100% 88% 100% 91% 82% 100% 100% 100% 62%
0% 10% 27% 0% 8% 14% 21% 33% 27% 13% 0% 25% 11% 32% 33% 8% 31% 33% 33% 0% 5% 20% 55% 0% 0% 0% 9% 0% 0% 0% 0% 15%
67% 90% 45% 57% 50% 29% 50% 17% 36% 31% 20% 25% 22% 11% 11% 8% 23% 0% 8% 13% 10% 40% 0% 0% 13% 0% 0% 18% 0% 0% 0% 22%
There is no market data available for one Instructor. There is no market data available for two Professors and one Assistant Professor. 3 There is no market data for the 51, 51.07 or 44.04 disciplines. Market data used was for the 44 discipline: Public Administration and Social Service Professions. 4 Please see the Blended CUPA Discipline tab for an explanation of the market data used. 5 There is no market data for 51, 51.15 or 42.06 disciplines. Market data used was for the 42 discipline: Psychology. Adjusted by removing 6 There is no market data available for one Instructor. faculty members 7 There is no market data available for one Instructor. ** NOTE: Librarian data was not available in the CUPA faculty survey due to a low response rate.
17
Professor 11.01 92,797 27.01 74,642 AVERAGE 83,720 Associate Professor 11.01 76,646 27.01 62,544 AVERAGE 69,595 Assistant Professor 11.01 63,073 27.01 50,229 AVERAGE 56,651
18
AAUP Competitiveness
SUMMARY OF AAUP ANALYSIS AAUP COMPARISON BY RANK - NO ASPIRATION PEERS AAUP Average Salary Incumben Rank ts Instructor 22 Assistant Profess 109 Associate Profess 120 Professor 67 TOTAL 318 Seton Hall Average Salary $53,389 $54,371 $68,025 $79,349 $255,134 Peer Group $50,425 $59,860 $72,687 $100,140 $283,112 Competitor Group $47,917 $59,488 $73,413 $97,100 $277,917 All Peers 108% 91% 93% 80% 91% Compa-Ratio Peer Group 106% 91% 94% 79% 90% Competitor Group 111% 91% 93% 82% 92%
19
Segal Consultant working with the Provost and others in academic affairs administration to review and provided recommendations.
20