Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The Effects of Lithium Ion and Other Agents on the Activitymyoof Inositol-1-phosphatasefrom Bovine Brain*
(Received for publication, June 9, 1980)
myo-Inositol-1-phosphatase has been partially puri- in rat testis and reported that it hydrolyzed both D- and Lfied from bovine brain. The enzyme has a molecular myo-inositol-1-P. The D-enantiomer of myo-inositol-1-P is weightofabout 58,000. BothL-myo-inositol l-phos- formed by the action of a phospholipase C on phosphatidyl phate and D-myo-inositol 1-phosphate are hydrolyzed inositol and may also be a degradative product in the metabby the enzymeas well as (-)-chiro-inositol3-phosphate olism of the polyphosphoinositides. It is thus probable that The myo-inositol-1-phosphatase, hydrolyzing both enantiomers and 2-AMP. Triphosphoinositideis not a substrate. by phosphatase is completely dependent on M 8 + , which of the inositol phosphates, functions as a part of the process . has a K, of 1 m ~ Calcium and manganese ions are by which the cell maintains its myo-inositol levels. competitive inhibitors of M&+ binding with Ki values In 1971, Allison and Stewart reported that the acute adminof 18 @ and 2 p ~ respectively. Lithium chloride inI , istration of lithium, adrug widely used to treatmanic-depreshibits the hydrolysis of both L- and D-myO-inOSitOl 1- sive illness, results in a 30% decrease in the level of myophosphate to the extent of 50%at a concentrationof 0.8 inositol cortex. Allison et aL(1976) showed that m ~ The phosphatase from testis is similarly inhibited lithium in rat cerebral causes the level of myo-inositol-1-P to . chloride also of by lithium. Lithium ion a noncompetitive inhibitor is M&+ binding and an uncompetitive inhibitor of myo- increase in the same tissue. We have recently found that, inositol 1-phosphate binding. Because lithium chloride during chronic LiC1-administration, the cortical levels of both administration elicits both an increase in the levels of D- and L-myo-inositol-1-P increase, with the D-enantiomer myo-inositol 1-phosphate and a decrease in the levels accounting for most of the effect. It t l, of myo-inositol in rat brain (Allison, 1978), and because was found in 1974, by Naccarato e a . that 250 mMLi, completely inhibits myo-inositol-1-phosphatase rat of these actions are blocked anticholinergicagents, we in vitro, by examined the effects cholinergic agonists and antag- mammary gland. Since inhibition of thisphosphatase by of onists on the enzyme and found none. The possibility lithium ion could account for at least part of the observed is effect in vivo, were led to study thei vitro effect of this thattheinhibition of this enzymebylithiumion we n related to the pharmacological actions oflithium is metal at pharmacologically effective concentrations (0.5 to 1.5 discussed. m).In this paper we report that lithium ion is a potent inhibitor of myo-inositol-1-phosphatase, we describe the and mode of the action of this inhibitor, and otheragents, on the myo-Inositol-1-phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.25) was first studied enzyme. in yeast by Chen and Charalampous (1966) who found that EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES this enzyme is a component of the pathway bywhich DPreparation of myo-Znositol-1-phosphatase-Wholebeef brains or glucose-6-P is converted to myo-inositol via the intermediate testes obtained from a local abattoir were either used fresh or kept L-myo-inositol-1-P.Eisenberg (1967) found the same enzyme frozen at -90C until used. All subsequent steps were performed at
* This work was supported by Grants NS-05159, NS-13781, and
AM-20579 from the National Institutes of Health. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. $Present address, The Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. 9 To whom correspondence should be addressed at Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. The recommended name for this enzyme (Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry) is 1L-myo-inositol1-phosphatase. Since from the work in this paper and in other studies it is evident that the natural substratesare both D- and L-myo-inositol 1-phosphate, we suggest that the name be simplified to myo-inositol1-phosphatase. Some of the early literature on inositol phosphates used absolute configuration notation that is the reverse of what is correct. The correct nomenclature is L-myo-inositol 1-phosphate for the product of the denovo synthetic pathway and D-myo-inOSitOl 1-phosphate for the phospholipase C product of phosphatidyl inositol hydrolysis. A ether)N, N, N, N-tetraacetic acid in a Waring Blendor. The homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000 X g for 30 min, and the supernatant was fractionated with ammonium sulfate. The 40 to 6 % precipitate 0 was dialyzed against 50 m~ Tris-HC1, pH 8.0,0.2 M KCl, and 0.1 m M ethylene glycol bis(B-aminoethyl ether)N, N, N, N-tetraacetic acid, applied to a column of Sephadex G-150 or Bio-Gel P-300,and eluted with the dialysis buffer containing 0.02%NaN3. There was a 90% recovery of activity from the Bio-Gel, as compared with 50%from the Sephadex. This preparation was used for most experiments reported here. Except as noted, the enzyme had a specific activity of 1.6 pnol of L-myo-inositol-1-Phydrolyzed per mg of protein per h. One unit of enzyme produces 1 nmol of P,/h at 37OC. Further purification of the enzyme was carried out by first applying the dialyzed (50 m Tris-HC1, pH 8.0) ammonium sulfate fraction M described above to a Whatman DE52 column which had been equilrecent discussion of cyclitol phosphate nomenclature clarifies errors in this area Agranoff, B.W. (1978)Trends Biochem. Sci. 3 1 ) N283(2, N285). W. R. Sherman, A.L. Leavitt, M. P. Honchar, L. M. Hallcher, and B. E. Phillips, manuscript in preparation.
4C. The tissue was homogenized in 2 volumes of 0.15 M KCl, 50 m M Tris-HC1, pH 8.0, and 0.1 m~ ethylene glycol bis(P-aminoethyl
10896
10897
changed to 52,000 upon heating at 70C for 15 min (75% recovery of activity). The bovine brain enzyme, which has the same thermal stability with regard to activity, was chromatographed on a Sephadex G-100 column and compared with molecular weight standards (Andrews, 1964). Both heated (70C for 15 min) and unheated preparations of the phosphatase had apparent molecular weights of 57,000 as determined on Sephadex G-150. The molecular weight of the unheated enzyme was later determined on Bio-Gel P-300 and found to be 58,800. The heated and nonheated enzymes were also found to have the same Rf upon electrophoresis in a continuous Trisglycine system with 7.5% cross-linked polyacrylamide gels.
pH Effects
The enzyme was found to have a pH optimumbetween 7.5 and 8.0 This is similar to that for the rat testis (pH 7 to 8, Eisenberg, 1967), rat mammary gland phosphatase (pH 8, Naccarato et al., 1974), and the bovine lens enzyme (pH 7.7, Kabasawa et al., 1974). During an attempted purification step, the enzyme was dialyzed against 20 m citrate buffer at pH 6.0, and all of the M activity was recovered when the pH was adjusted to 8.0. Dialysis at pH 5.0, however, resulted in the complete loss of activity. Substrate Specificity Eisenberg (1967) found that myo-inositol-1-phosphatase from several organs of rat hydrolyzed D- and L-myo-inositol-lP, 2'-AMP, and P-glycerophosphate, but was inactive with myo-inositol-2-P.Enzyme from testis was studied more extensively and was found to hydrolyze (-)-chiro-inositol-3-P and a-glycerophosphate. Other phosphate esters such as ~-Glc-6P and ~ - G l c - l - P were not substrates. We have found similar specificity with the bovine brain enzyme, except that 2'-AMP is hydrolyzed at a lower rate; a- and P-glycerophosphate were not substrates. In an attempt toestablish that the activities of the bovine brain enzyme were al due to thesame phosphatase, electrol phoresis was performed on our most pure enzyme preparation, which had been purified through the Affi-Gel Blue stage, and which had a specific activity of 45 pmol/mg of protein/h. Following electrophoresis, the gelwas sliced, the enzyme extracted, and aliquots were then incubated with several substrates. As shown in Fig. 1, the hydrolytic rates versus the RF of the activity with L-myo-inositol-1-P,(-)-chiro-inositoll same 3-P, D-myo-inositol-1-P, and 2'-AMP al maximize at the location. The ratio of activities with these substrates is 1:O.B: 0.70.2. L-a-Glycerophosphate was not hydrolyzed. When gels run at the same time were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R distinct protein bands were observed at the RFvalues of slices 48, 51, 54, 56, and 59, as well as at RF values more distant from the activity. Two-gel filtration-purified preparations of the phosphatase M were found to have a K,, for L-myo-inositol-1-P,of 0.10 m The (concentration range 0.15 to 2.5 m). D-enantiomer has the same K,,, value. No substrate inhibition was found to anLmyo-inositol-1-P concentration of 5 mM. The V,,, ratio of the L- to the D-enantiomer was 1.3. In several experiments with synthetic myo-inositol-1-P,the racemic mixture was hydrolyzed at a lower rate than the Lenantiomer. This was evidently due to an impurity since a mixture containing equal amounts of the pure D- and pure Lenantiomers had only the decrease in activity expected from the lower reactivity of the D form. Thus, the ratio of activity of L:DL:D was1:0.9:0.8 when the concentration of substrate was 0.7 m in each case. M Rat brain polyphosphoinositide phosphomonoesterase is a
Molecular Weight The molecular weight of myo-inositol-1-phosphatase from rat mammary gland was studied by Naccarato et al. (1974), who reported a native molecular weight of210,000 which
J. Eichberg, personal communication.
10898
0.6
04
a a Q
0
02
46
48
58
60
005
FIG. 1. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of myo-inositol1-phosphatase with a specific activity 'of 46 nmol/mg/h. L I I I I Twenty-six micrograms of protein was applied to the cylindrical gel. 0 5 I O 1 5 20 The gel was cut into 91 1-mm slices and assayed as described under [&++I(mM) "Experimental Procedures." Substrates were o " 0 , L-myo-inositolFIG. 2. The effect of magnesium on myo-inositol-l-phospha1-P; M(-)-inositol-3-P; MD-myo-inositol-I-P;A-A, , myo-inositol-I-P (0.8 m) was incubated in 50 m M 2'-AMP; and A-A, L-a-glycerophosphate. The apparent increase tase. W, , in activity at slice 52 is not reproducible. There is no other activity Tris-HCI, pH 7.8, with different concentrations of Mg2+.M using a stability constant for the magnesium complex with myothroughout the gel. inositol-I-P of M", an amount of L-myo-inositol-1-Pwas added at each point to give a calculated concentration of uncomplexed subsoluble enzyme which has been purified by Nijjar and Haw- strate equal to 0.57 m ~ The calculated concentration of the complex . thorne (1977). Although some of the reported properties of at 20 m Mg2+is 0.56 m. This shows that the inhibition by higher M is that enzyme differ from those of ours (e.g. inactivation at concentrations ofMg '+ not a result of substrate depletion. The 75C and metal requirements) we tested the bovine brain rates of each plot were arithmetically adjusted for graphical represenlower X 0.7). myo-inositol-1-phosphatase with triphosphoinositide as sub- tation (upper x 1.4, strate. As used by Nijjar and Hawthorne, the system con- An experiment was performed wherein the amount of free LM tained 1 m F- (which at thisconcentration is 50%inhibitory myo-inositol-1-P added initially was adjusted to maintain a M to our enzyme), 1 m triphosphoinositide, or 1 mhi L-myoconstant final concentration of the substance for each Mg2+ M inositol-1-P with 3 m cysteine and 1 m cetyltrimethylam- concentration, using the 50 M-' stability constant.As is shown M monium bromide. In thepresence of sufficient myo-inositol-l- in Fig. 2 (closed circles) the degree of inhibition is similar to phosphatase to hydrolyze 5.3 pmol of the inositol phosphate that found without consideration of the complex formation, per h, under standard conditions, we hydrolyzed 104 nmol of suggesting that magnesium inhibition is due to a direct effect L-myo-inositol-1-Pin 30 min (37OC) but less than 3 nmol of on the enzyme. triphosphoinositide. Calcium and Manganese-Fig. 3 shows that calcium and manganese are powerful inhibitors of the phosphatase. Fig. 4 Effects of Divalent Cations shows that Ca2+is a competitive inhibitor of M 2 + binding.' Magnesium-myo-Inositol-1-phosphatasehas no measura- The K, calculated from the datain Fig. 4 is 18 p ~Manganese . ble activity in the absence of Mg2+,and, as can be seen in Fig is also a competitive inhibitor of Mg2+(not shown) with a K, 2 (open circles), is maximally stimulated at a magnesium Of 2 pM. concentration of 3 to 4 mM. At higher concentrations, inhibiOur findings of potent calcium and manganese inhibition of tion occurs. Other metals that were tested in the place of the bovine brain myo-inositol-1-phosphatase, the inability and magnesium were Ca2+,Mn2+, Fez+, Zn2+,Cu2+,and Co2+.Of of either metal to substitute M F , is in contrast with other for these, Co2+gave 10% stimulation, while the rest gave ~ 3 %reports on this enzyme. Kabaswa et al. (1974) found that 3 activation at a concentration of 3.5 mM. m Mn2+ gave 30% of the activity of that concentration of M To the extent that a complex between magnesium and myo- Mg2+with the bovine lens myo-inositol-1-phosphatase. This inositol-1-P is formed it will reduce the concentrations of free may, however, have been due to a contaminating activity, myo-inositol-l-P2- and Mg2+available to the enzyme. With a since their enzyme preparation was about 30%as active toward stability constant of 50 M-', which is that given by O'Sullivan ~-Glc-6-P as was toward D-myo-inositol-1-P. Calcium was it and Smithers (1979) for hexose 6-phosphate, and with typical inhibitory to the bovine lens enzyme, although it was only incubation levels of Mg2+and myo-inositol-1-P (3 m and 0.7 studied at high (5 mM) concentration. Eisenberg (1967) also M mM), the calculated concentration of the magnesium complex found Mn2+to partially substitute for Mg+, as Naccarato did is 0.09 mM, an insignificant reduction in the amount of either et al. (1974).Both of the latter authors studied enzyme from Mg2+ or substrate. The calculated effect that this stability rat tissues; thus species differences could account for their constant has the K , value of myo-inositol-1-Pis a reduction results. on of 15%.Lineweaver-Burk plots, over a substrate concentration In some experiments a preincubation period was usedin the belief range of 0.03 to 2.6 mM, are linear. Therefore, over this concentration range the effect of complex formation on the that a slow equilibrium step occurred in the reaction. This was found to not be the case, and the step was not used in subsequent experireaction is neither inhibitory nor stimulatory. ments. Two of these experiments were in the study of the effect of It seemed possible that the apparent inhibition of the hy- Ca2+on Mg2+binding (30-min preincubation, the reaction initiated drolysis of myo-inositol-1-P by high levels of Mg2+might be with Mg") and in the study of the effect of Li' on Mgz+binding (45due to depletion of substrate by M$+ via complex formation. min preincubation, the reaction started with myo-inositol-1-P).
on myo-Inositol-I-phosphatase
10899
the L-enantiomer and with (-)-chiro-inositol-3-P as well. Heated (7OoC, 15 min) and unheated enzyme are inhibited alike. Rubidium and cesium,like sodium, potassium, and ammonium are not inhibitory to concentrations of 4 m ~ In . the absence of M e , Li+ is not stimulatory. Thus itis evident that theeffect of lithium ion on this enzyme is unique among this group of cations and not a general (e.g. ionic strength) effect. The Mode of Action of Li+ To determine if lithium ion causes an irreversible change in the phosphatase, the enzyme was first incubated with 0, 0.5, 5, and 100 m~ LiCl at 37C for 30 min and then dialyzed against 50 m~ Tris-HC1, pH 8.0, for 2 days. The activities in all cases were comparable at the end of the treatment. In another experiment, we investigated whether Li+ effected a slow or a rapid change in the catalytic activity of the enzyme. The phosphatase was incubated in standard buffer with Lmyo-inositol-1-P, and aliquots were removed periodically for i, measurement of activity. After 30 mn LiCl wasadded to give a final concentration of 0.6 mM. The reaction immediately assumed a new rate which continued linearly for 80 min.Thus Li' is a rapid and reversible inhibitor of the phosphatase. It has beensuggested that part of the pharmacological action of lithium may be due to competition for magnesium sites in certain M8+-dependent enzymes (Birch 1974; Birch, 1978). In five separate experiments with rnyo-inositol-l-phosphatase, we found no evidence that Li+ is competitive with M F . Instead, the effect of Li' onMg2+binding is pure noncompetitive inhibition, i.e. there is no effect of lithium ion on the K,,, of Mg2+.In experiments5using 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1 m~ LiCl and analyzing the data by the Lineweaver-Burk obtained for Mg2+ was method, the mean K,,, value which was 0.9 0.1 m (S.D.). A direct linear plot (Eisenthal and M Cornish-Bowden, 1974), which very sensitive to differences is between competitive, uncompetitive, noncompetitive, and mixed inhibition, also indicated that Li+ was noncompetitive a inhibitor of M e . The direct linear plot, which is also less
FIG.3. Inhibition of myo-inositol-1-phosphatase by Cap+ and Mn2+. Incubations with 24 units of enzyme activity wereunder
standard conditions, as described under "Experimental Procedures."
241 2ot
22
18t
FIG.4. Lineweaver-Burk plot showing the competitive inhibition of magnesium binding by calcium. V, nanomoles of
phosphate released per min. Lines were obtained by linear regression analysis of the data. Standard incubation conditions were used with 23 units of enzyme activity.
The Effects of Li+ and Other monovalent Cations myo-Inositol-1-phosphatase stimulated 1.5-fold over low is salt media by 0.3 M K' and Na'. This stimulation persists to levels as high as 0.5 M. Ammonium ionstimulates 2-fold at 0.1 M, an effect that decreases at higher concentrations, falling to the basal level at 0.5 M. Fig. 5 shows the results of adding low concentrations of NH,' and Group l a metals to incubations of the phosphatase with L-myo-inositol-1-Ppresence of 250 m~ K'. Only lithium ion is inhibitory, giving 50% inhibition at about 0.8 mM. The inhibition by Li+ occurs to the same degree with the D- and
FIG.5. Effects of monovalent cations on the myo-inositol-lphosphatase catalyzed hydrolysis of substrate using 17 units of enzyme activity under standard incubation conditions (in the presence of 250 m~ K+). Ions used were: A-A, NH,+;
HRb'; o"--o, , Cs'; W,Na'; and V, The Li'. effect of lithium i unique among these ions. s
10900
sensitive to statistical bias (Cornish-Bowden,1979), gave K , a for M ' of 1.0 f 0.1. Analysis of this data by the s / V versus g s and the V uersus V / s methods both gave K, values of 1.1 f 0.2. Thus lithium ion reduces the rate of myo-inositol-1-P hydrolysis without altering the binding of magnesium ion. We also have found no evidence of competition by Li' for myo-inositol-1-P binding. Incubations with varied myo-inositol-1-P concentration andconstant [Mg"] with three Li' concentrations, when analyzed by the Lineweaver-Burk method, show lithium ion to be an uncompetitive inhibitor of myo-inositol-1-P (Fig. In uncompetitive inhibition the ratio 6). KJV is constant for all levels of the inhibitor, thus as Li+ reduces the rateof substrate hydrolysis it increases the binding of myo-inositol-1-P.The three KJV (slope) values forLi' in the Lineweaver-Burk plot (Fig. 6) are 0.61, 0.69, and 0.70. The 0 lithium concentration slope is 0.66. Analysis of the experimental data by direct linear plot as well as by the l / V versus i and s/V versus i methods all uniquely show the inhibition to be uncompetitive. An explanation of the mechanism of this inhibition is that lithium ion binds only to the enzyme-substrate complex and that this form of the enzyme is of low activity.
Other Inhibitory Agents myo-Inositol-2-P is a competitive inhibitor of bovine brain myo-inositol-1-phosphatase with a Ki of0.3 m ~ Rat mam. has mary myo-inositol-1-phosphatase also been reported to be inhibited by myo-inositol-2-P (Naccarato et al., 1974).Sulfate inhibits the activity by 40% at 17 m ~ Fluoride exhibits an . inhibition-concentration profiie almost identical with that of lithium chloride; however,fluoride inhibition is probably due to the removal of Mg2+.Neither myo-inositol, D-sorbitol,nor D-glucose is inhibitory to the phosphatase when the concentration of each is 30 mM.
Insofar as is known, myo-inositol can be generated in the central nervous system by four routes: myo-inositol-1-P synthase (Eisenberg, 1967; Mauck et al., 1980),the epimerization of scyllo-inositol (Hipps et al., 1977; Sherman et al., 1978),the metabolism of the phosphoinositides (e.g. Hawthorne and Pickard, 1979), and transport (Spector and Lorenzo, 1975; Spector, 1976).Three pathways are known to utilize free myoinositol: transport outward from brain to plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (Spector, 1978), epimerization to scyllo-inositol and neo-inositol, and uptake into the phosphoinositides. Of these pathways that contribute to the myo-inositol pool, two produce myo-inositol-1-P:L-myo-inositol-1-P synthase converts ~-Glc-6-P L-myo-inositol-1-P, and that portion of to phosphatidyl inositol metabolism which occurs by the phospholipase C pathway produces D-myo-inositol-1-P.Rat kidney cortex fractions are known to degrade polyphosphoinositides to myo-inositol-1-P (Lapetina et al., 1975); however,it is not yet known whether similar enzymesoccurin brain. With respect to whether the lipid or synthase pathway is more active in producing myo-inositol-1-P,we have found rat cerebral cortex to contain D- and L-myo-inositol-1-Pin a concenWhile it is uncertain to what degree tration ratio of3.5 to these two pathways feed the free myo-inositol pool, it has been estimated that there is sufficient phosphatidyl inositol I phospholipase C in brain to hydrolyze all of that tissue's phosphatidyl inositol in 30 s (Hawthorne and Pickard, 1979). Thus thepotential for a major source of D-myo-inositol-1-Pis constantly present in brain. In each of these cases the agent for the hydrolysis of the D- and L-enantiomers is probably the 2 4 6 8 1 0 enzyme we have studied in this paper. l/[MlP] ( m M ) The effect oflithium on myo-inositol-1-P levels in cererat FIG. 6. Lineweaver-Burk plot showing the uncompetitive bral cortex is large in magnitude. A 5 meq/kg dose of LiCl, inhibition of myo-inositol-1-P binding by lithium ion. The K,/ V,, (slope) valuesare 0 6 (no Li+), 0.61 (0.096 mhf Li+),0.69 (0.26 which results in brain tissue levels of 6.9 meq of Li+/kg of dry .6 from m~ E+), 0.70 (0.51 m~ Li+).V, nanomoles of phosphate released tissue, causes an increase in brain myo-inositol-1-P levels and per min. Lines were obtained by linear regression analysis. Standard 0.34 mmol/kg dry weight to 2.9 mmol/kg dry weight (Allison incubation conditionswere used with 5.5 units of enzyme activity. et al., 1976).It has been found that this increase is due to the
10901
We have found that myo-inositol-1-phosphatase from bovine testis is also inhibited by lithium ion. It is known that decreased myo-inositol synthesis in testis is accompanied by a decrease in the number of spermatids and spermatozoa, suggesting a role for myo-inositol in spermatogenesis (Morris and Collins, 1971). thus mustbe consideredwhat the effects It of lithium may be on testis and on other organs outside the central nervous system both from the standpoint of the effect on myo-inositol levels and on levels of myo-inositol-1-P.
Acknowledgement-We wish to acknowledge the work of S. L. Goodwin, who performed some of the initial experiments in this study.
REFERENCES Allison, J. H., and Stewart, M. A. (1971) Nature 233,267-268 Allison, J. H., and Blisner, M.E. (1976) Biochem.Biophys. Res. Commun. 68,1332-1338 Allison, J. H., Blisner, M.E., Holland, W. H., Hipps, P. P., and Sherman, W. R. (1976) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 71,664670 Allison, J . H. (1978) i Cyclitols and Phosphoinositides (Wells, W. n W., and Eisenberg, F., Jr., eds) pp. 507-519, Academic Press, New York Andrews, P. (1964) Biochem. J.96,595-605 Bartlett, G. R. (1958) J.Biol. Chem. 234,459-465 Birch, N. J . (1974) Lancet 2, 965-966 Birch, N. J. (1978) in Lithium in Medical Practice (Johnson, F. N., and Johnson,S., eds) pp. 89-114, University Park Press, Baltimore, MD Burton, L. E., and Wells, W . W(1974) Deu. Biol. 37,35-42 . Chen, I. W., and Charalampous, F. C. (1966) J. Biol. Chem. 241, 2194-2199 Cornish-Bowden, A. (1979) Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics, pp. 203-207, Buttenvorths, London Dittmer, J. C., and Dawson, R. M. C. (1961) Biochem. J. 81,535-545 Eisenberg, F., Jr. (1967) J.Biol. Chem. 242, 1375-1382 Eisenthal, R., and Cornish-Bowden, A. (1974) Biochem. J.139, 715720 Griffin, H. D., and Hawthorne, J. N. (1978) Biochem. J.176,541-552 Griffin, H. D., Hawthorne, J. N., Sykes, M., and Orlacchio, A. (1979) Biochem. Pharmacol. 28, 1143-1147 Hawthorne, J. N., and Pickard, M. R. (1979) J. Neurochem. 32, 5-14 Hipps, P. P., Holland, W . H., and Sherman, W. R. (1977) Biochem. Bzophys. Res. Commun. 77,340-346 Itaye, K., Ui, M. (1966) Clin. Chim. Acta 14,361-366 and Kabasawa, I., Lou, M. F., Merola, L. O., and Kinoshita, J. H. (1974) Ophthalmic Res. 6, 155-165 Lapetina, E. G., Seguin, E. B., and Agranoff, B. W. (1975) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 398, 118-124 Lunt, G . G., and Pickard, M. R. (1975) J.Neurochem. 24, 1203-1208 Mauck, L. M., Wong, Y.-H., and Sherman, W. R. (1980) Biochemistry 19,3623-3629 Miller, J. C. (1977) Biochem. J.168, 549-555 Morris, R. N., Collins, A. C. (1971) J.Reprod. Fertil. 27,201-210 and Naccarato, W. F., Ray, R. E., and Wells, W. W. (1974)Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 164, 194-201 W a r , M. S., and Hawthorne, J. N. (1977) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 480,890-402 OSullivan, W. J., and Smithers, G. W. (1979) Methods Enzymol. 63, 294-336 Paulus, H., and Kennedy, E. P. (1960) J.Biol. Chem. 236, 1303-1311 Pizer, F. L., and Ballou, C. E. (1959) J.Am. Chem. SOC. 81,915-921 Sherman, W. R., Goodwin,S. L., and Zinbo, M.(1971) J. Chromatogr. Sei. 9, 363-367 Sherman, W. R., Hipps, P. P., Mauck, L. A., and Rasheed, A. (1978) in Cyclitols and Phosphoinositides (Wells, W . W., and Eisenberg, F., Jr., eds) pp. 279-295, Academic Press, New York Soukup, J. H., Friedel, R. O., and Schanberg, S. M. (1978) Biochem. Pharmacol. 27, 1239-1243 Spector, R., and Lorenzo, A. V. (1975)Am. J.Physiol. 228,1510-1518 Spector, R. (1976) J.Neurochem. 27,229-239 Spector, R. (1978) in Cyclitols and Phosphoinositides (Wells, W. W., and Eisenberg, F., Jr., eds) pp. 499-506, Academic Press, New York Yandrasitz, J. R., and Segal, S. (1979) FEBS Lett. 108, 279-282