Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

Case 1:09-cv-00752-HTW Document 11-7 Filed 05/04/09 Page 1 of 6

Arbitration

James J. Murtagh, M.D., Plaintiff, v. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority, Emory University, Emory Healthcare, Inc., Grady Health Services Company, Inc., John Does 1-10 Defendants.

) ) ) Civil Action ) File N0. 2004CV94259 ) ) ) ) ) )

AMENDED PLEADING INDEX NO. 1) DATE 11/18/05 DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Dr. Murtagh's Interrogatories to Respondents Emory University and Emory Healthcare Inc. CONTENTS OF DOCUMENT Discovery sought, among other things, information regarding St. Paul litigation, employment records, media logs (These are items that are known to exist, but were either incompletely produced or not at all.) Documents were sought similar to the inquiries made by the Request for Production Discovery sought, among other things, Employment records, and information believed to exist regarding corruption

2)

11/21/05

3)

11/21/05

Dr. Murtaghs First Request for Production to Respondents Emory University and Emory Healthcare, Inc. Dr. Murtaghs First Request for Production to Respondents Fulton-Dekalb Hospital Authority and Grady Health Services, Inc.

Case 1:09-cv-00752-HTW Document 11-7 Filed 05/04/09 Page 2 of 6

NO.

DATE

DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT

CONTENTS OF DOCUMENT

4)

11/21/05

5)

12/12/05

6)

1/5/06

7)

1/17/06

8)

1/27/06

9)

3/9/06

Dr. Murtagh's Interrogatories to Respondents FultonDekalb Hospital Authority, Grady Health Services Company, Inc. Dr. Murtagh's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Responses from Emory University and Emory Healthcare Inc. Emory University's and Emory Healthcare's Response to Dr. Murtagh 's Motion To Compel Production of Documents and Responses From Emory University and Emory Healthcare Dr. Murtagh's Reply to Emory University's and Emory Healthcare's Response to Dr. Murtagh's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Responses From Emory University and Emory Healthcare Dr. Murtagh's Notice of page excerpts from Privilege log in case of Emory University and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. v. St. Paul Fire and Casualty Company and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company Decision of the Arbitrator compelling Emory to produce thirty-six categories of documents

Dr. Murtagh provided the Arbitrator with copies of document excerpts he had from documents requested through discovery from the St. Paul litigation which Emory claimed did not exist. Arbitrator granted motion to compel discovery, but set aside Dr. Murtaghs request for attorneys fees and costs pending Emory non-compliance.

10)

2/28/07

11)

3/30/07

Dr. Murtagh's Motion for Sanctions and Findings of Contempt and to Compel Discovery Pursuant to Both Georgia Law and Arbitration Rules (Under Tab 138 Sealed Documents) Emory University's and Emory Healthcare, Inc.'s Response in Opposition to Dr. Murtagh's Six Pro Se Motions Filed Between February 26 and March 5, 2007

Case 1:09-cv-00752-HTW Document 11-7 Filed 05/04/09 Page 3 of 6

NO.

DATE

DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT and Emory's Motion for Sanctions and Memorandum of Law In Support of the Same Dr. Murtagh's Reply Brief to Defendant's Response to Six Motions Decision of the Arbitrator

CONTENTS OF DOCUMENT

12) 13) 14) 15)

4/06/07 6/4/07 6/5/07 6/13/07

Arbitrator required Emory to document peer review investigation

16)

7/18/07

17)

7/24/07

Letter regarding Emorys position regarding the June 4, 2007 order Letter from Culotta on responding to Emorys and Letter pointed out to the Arbitrator significant Gradys filing in response to Arbitrators June 4, 2007 contradictory responses to decision. previously stated positions by Emory. Decision of the Arbitrator (1) Murtaghs motion for extension of the discovery period GRANTED in part. Non expert discovery extend 45 days; (2) Emorys request to extend deadlines for expert discovery and Dispositive motion GRANTED in part. Expert discovery 45 days; dispositive motion 30 days after the close of expert discovery; (3) Emory request for cost from switching counsel DENIED; (4) Emorys request for no further discovery extensions or switching of counsel DENIED; (5) Murtaghs petition to remove Emorys Counterclaim and eliminate secrecy DENIED; (6) Murtaghs motion for Sanctions DENIED; (7) Murtaghs motion to move Torts not Arbitrable DENIED; (8) Murtaghhs motion to correct the judicial record is DENIED; (9) Murtaghs motion that Defendants Cease and Desist ongoing tortuous activity and violations of Judicial Seals DENIED; (10) Document request. Emory Universitys and Emory Healthcare, Inc.s Response to Dr. Murtaghs Supplemental Reply to his

Case 1:09-cv-00752-HTW Document 11-7 Filed 05/04/09 Page 4 of 6

NO.

DATE

DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT

CONTENTS OF DOCUMENT

18)

8/14/07

19)

8/24/07

20)

8/24/07

21)

8/24/07

22)

8/24/07

23)

8/27/07

24) 25)

8/30/07 8/31/07

26) 27)

8/31/07 8/31/07

February 26, 2007 Petition for Reconsideration Expedited Motion for Sanctions to stay oral testimony Motion sought to stay further oral discovery pending defendants compliance with the arbitrators pending Emory being forced to order to produce documents and to dismiss produce outstanding discovery. counterclaims Dr. Murtaghs Emergency Motion for Protective Order, Brief in Support, and Request for Emergency Hearing Decision of the Arbitrator Dr. Murtaghs First Request for Admission to Respondents Fulton-Dekalb Hospital Authority and Grady Health Services Company, Inc. Dr. Murtaghs Second Continuing Interrogatories to Respondents Emory University and Emory Healthcare, Inc. Dr. Murtaghs Second Continuing Interrogatories to Respondents to Fulton- Dekalb Hospital Authority and Grady Health Services Company, Inc. Emorys Consolidated Response to Dr. Murtaughs Expedited Motion for Sanctions to Stay Oral Testimony and his Emergency Motion for Protective Order Letter from Culotta to Deane regarding oral testimony of witnesses other than Murtaugh Dr. Murtaghs Second Continuing Interrogatories to Respondents Emory University and Emory Healthcare, Inc. Dr. Murtaghs Second Continuing Interrogatories to Respondents Fulton-Dekalb Hospital Authority Dr. Murtaghs First Request for Admission to Respondents Emory University and Emory Healthcare, Inc.

Case 1:09-cv-00752-HTW Document 11-7 Filed 05/04/09 Page 5 of 6

NO. 28) 29) 30)

DATE 8/31/07 9/10/07 9/10/07

DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Dr. Murtaghs First Request for Admission to Respondents Fulton-Dekalb Hospital Authority Decision of the Arbitrator Respondents Emory Universitys and Emory Healthcare, Inc.s Supplemental Response to Dr. Murtaghs First Interrogatories 1) Dr. Murtaghs Alternative Motions to Strike Emorys Purported Motion for Sanctions As Not In Compliance with Applicable Rules, To Summarily Deny Such Motion for Lack of Jurisdiction and As Moot, To Stay Proceeds on Emorys Motion for Sanctions, and For A Continuance of Hearing on Emorys Motion and 2) Dr. Murtagh Dr. James Murtaghs Motion For Recusal Of Arbitrator And Disclosure Of Information Related To Potential Conflicts Emory Universitys and Emory Healthcare, Inc.s Response to Dr. Murtaughs Motion for Recusal of the Arbitrator and Discolsure of Information Related to Potential Conflicts and Motion for Sanctions Email and letter Submission to AAA from Culotta to Deane Emails regarding Conference call on Murtaghs Motions for Recusal and To Strike Emorys Sanctions Motion Defendants The Fulton-Dekalb Hospital Authority and Grady Health ServicesCompany, Incs Response to Dr. Murtagh Dr. James Murtaghs Motion for Recusal of Arbitrator and Disclosure of Information Related to Potential Conflicts

CONTENTS OF DOCUMENT

Murtagh discovery extension request granted in part and denied in part

31)

1/18/08

32)

1/23/08

2/13/08 2/13/08

33)

2/13/08

Case 1:09-cv-00752-HTW Document 11-7 Filed 05/04/09 Page 6 of 6

NO.

DATE 2/13/08 2/13/08

DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT Emails regarding the AAA and emails regarding the call going forward Email follow-up on Conference call on Dr. Murtagh Motion for Recusal attaching a copy of Power Services Associates Inv v. UNC Metcalf Servicing, Inc. Decision of the Arbitrator Order Decision of the Arbitrator Decision of the Arbitrator Decision of the Arbitrator

CONTENTS OF DOCUMENT

34) 35) 36) 37) 38)

3/13/08 4/21/08 6/23/08 8/14/08 2/4/09

Decision to Refuse Recusal Conduct of Arbitration Decision to Grant Emory Motion for Sanctions Decision to hold hearing on fee petition. Final Award

Вам также может понравиться