110,694 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT) FILED NO. 5 OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA) STATE OF ORLAHOMA a/k/a JENKS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT JUN 14 2012 NO. 9 OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA,) ‘a/k/a UNION PUBLIC SCHOOLS, MICHAEL § RICHIE ‘THE APPELLATE COURTS, Plaintiffs/Appellees, vs. RUSSELL SPRY, STEPHANIE SPRY, TIM TYLICKI, KIMBERLY TYLICKT, TIM FISHER, KRISTIN FISHER, STEFAN HIPSKIND, STEPHANIE HIPSKIND, JERRY SNEED, SHANNA SNEED, E. SCOTT PRUITT, OKLAHOMA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants/Appellants. ATTORNEY GENERAL’S BRIEF ON THE MERITS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS PATRICK R. WYRICK, OBA #21874 SOLICITOR GENERAL OKLAHOMA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 313 NE 21" STREET OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 (405) 522-4448 (405) 522-0669 FAX patrick.wyrick@oag.ok.gov Tune 14, 2012110,694 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT) NO. 5 OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA,) alk/a/ JENKS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 9 OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA,) a/k/a UNION PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Plaintifts/Appellees, vs. RUSSELL SPRY, STEPHANIE SPRY, TIM TYLICKI, KIMBERLY TYLICKI, TIM FISHER, KRISTIN FISHER, STEFAN HIPSKIND, STEPHANIE HIPSKIND, JERRY SNEED, SHANNA SNEED, E. SCOTT PRUITT, OKLAHOMA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants/Appellants. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S BRIEF ON THE MERITS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS PATRICK R. WYRICK, OBA #21874 SOLICITOR GENERAL OKLAHOMA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 313 NE 21" STREET OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 (403) 522-4448 (405) 522-0669 FAX patrick.wyrick@oag.ok.gov June 14, 2012TABLE OF CONTENTS AND AUTHORITIES Introduction Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 8 v. Swanson, 1976 OK 71, 553 P.2d 496 Summary of the Argument ... Art. X,§14 .. Art. X, §15 .. Art. XII, § 1... Arguments and Authorities .. . L The District Court erred by failing to find that the School Districts lack standing to vicariously assert alleged violations of an individual right held by ‘Oklahoma students, and by failing to find that even if the School Districts had standing, the Scholarship Act does not deny any Oklahoma student equal protection of the law . Gladstone v. Bartlesville Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 30, 2003 OK 30, 66 P.3d 442 Massachusetts v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923) . Oklahoma Education Ass’n. v. State, 2007 OK 30, 158 P.3d 1058... 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400, ef seq. ..--.2+++ 29 U.S.C. § 794Il. The District Court erred because the Schoo! Districts failed to establish that no set of circumstances exist under which the Scholarship Act does not violate Art. T§5.. Davis v. Fieker, 1997 OK 156, 952 P.2d 505 E. Okla, Bldg. & Const. Trades Council v. Pitts, 2003 OK 113, 82 P.3d 1008 ... Fent v. Okla, Capitol Improvement Authority, 1999 OK 64, 984 P.2d 200 Schmitt v. Hunt, 1960 OK 257, 359 P.2d 198 United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987) ArtI§S ... A. The scholarship monies provided under the Scholarship Act serve the very public Purpose of educating Oklahoma school Children’s Home and Welfare Association v. Childers, 171 P.2d 613 (Okla. 1946) Murrow Indian Orphans Home v. Childers, 171 P.2d 600 (Okla. 1946) WM, 12 Sharp ». City of Guthrie, 152 P. 403 (Okla. 1915) el Art II, §5 +. Art. X,§14 ... Art. X, $15... 2007 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 274, §§ 1-3 - 2008 OK AG 10 +10, 11 iiB. The scholarship monies provided under the Scholarship Act serve the very public purpose of educating Oklahoma school children with disabilities 12 State ex rel. Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 1997 OK 117, 946 P-2d 1140 Way v. Grand Lake Ass’n, 1981 OK 70, 635 P.2d 1010 70 O.S. § 13-101.2(H) ..- C. The State of Oklahoma receives valuable consideration in exchange for the scholarship monies Burkhardt v. City of Enid, 1989 OK 45,771 P.2d 608 .... Children’s Home and Welfare Association v. Childers, 171 P.2d 613 (Okla. 1946) .... sees 70 OS. § 13-101.2(B)(1) IL. The district court erred because nothing in the Scholarship Act impairs the State’s maintenance of a system of free public schools . Adwon v. Okla. Retail Grocers Ass’n, 1951 OK 43, 228 P.2d 376 Draper v. State, 1980 OK 117, 621 P.2d 1142 .... School Dist No. 62 Craig Coung ». School Dist. No. 17 Craig County, 1930 OK 112, 287 P. 1035. 14 Art. 1, §5 Art. XII, § 1 iiiIV. The district court erred because the State receives adequate consideration in exchange for the scholarship monies, which means they are not “gifts.” .... Hawks v. Bland, 1932 OK 101, 9 P.2d 720 .....+- Art.X,§15 -..eeeeee ‘To the extent it relied on the reasoning offered by the School Districts at oral argument, the district court erred ......- Conclusion . Certificate of Service . . ivIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 5 OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, alk/a/ JENKS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 9 OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, a/k/a UNION PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Plaintiffs/Appellees, vs. No. 110,694 RUSSELL SPRY, STEPHANIE SPRY, ‘TIM TYLICKI, KIMBERLY TYLICKI, TIM FISHER, KRISTIN FISHER, STEFAN HIPSKIND, STEPHANIE HIPSKIND, JERRY SNEED, SHANNA SNEED, Defendants/Appellants, E. SCOTT PRUITT, OKLAHOMA. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Appellant. ‘TORNEY GENERAL’S BRIEF ON ‘THE MERITS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CL: ‘Attorney General E. Scott Pruitt files the following brief in support of the constitutionality of the Lindsey Nicole Henry Scholarships for Students with Disabilities Program Act (“the ‘Scholarship Act”), and respectfully requests the Court reverse the erroneous judgment of the district, court." ' For simplicity’s sake, this brief will refer to the Appellees, Independent Schoo! District No. 5 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, a/k/a Jenks Public Schools and Independent School District No. 9 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, a/k/a Union Public Schools, as “the School Districts”, and will refer to the Appellants, Russell Spry, Stephanie Spry, Tim Tylicki, Kimberly Tylicki, Tim Fisher, Kristin Fisher, Stephanie Hipskind, Jerry Sneed, and Shanna Sneed, as “the Parents”.Introduction ‘This Court once took judicial notice of “the immeasurable social, psychological and economic value of an education in contemporary society.”> When a child with a disability seeks to obtain such a valuable education, it is critical that they be provided one that is uniquely tailored to ‘meet their special and individualized needs. With the Scholarship Act, the Legislature tried to censure that parents of children with disabilities have every opportunity to provide their children with just such an education. ‘When the district court—without explanation or analysis—declared the Scholarship Act ‘unconstitutional, it invalidated a legislative policy choice that received remarkable bipartisan support, and which was grounded in the uncontroversial notion that when it comes to educating children with disabilities, choice and flexibility are critical. ‘There are five primary reasons the district court's decision should be reversed. 1. The Scholarship Act does not treat similarly-situated children differently, but even if it did, the School Districts lack standing to vicariously assert equal protection claims on behalf of individual students; 2. The State has the discretion to provide for the education of children with disabilities through scholarships that can be used at institutions of the parents’ choice, even if some of those institutions happen to have some religious affiliation; 3. The School Districts admit that three of the five sets of Parents apply their scholarship monies towards tuition at a non-sectarian school; they have thus utterly failed to prove their claim that the scholarship monies are used for sectarian purposes in every instance; 4. The State is currently maintaining a system of public schools as required by the state constitution—the Scholarship Act does nothing to change that; 2 Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 8 v. Swanson, 1976 OK 71,25, 553 P.2d 496, 501. 25. The State receives valuable consideration for the scholarship monies it provides under the Scholarship Act, so those monies are not constitutionally- prohibited gifts; Summary of the Argument The School Districts claim that the Scholarship Act violates four separate provisions of the Oklahoma Constitution. First, they claim that the Scholarship Act violates the equal protection component of the Oklahoma Constitution’s Due Process Clause (Art. II, § 7). Second, they claim that thie Scholarship Act violates the Oklahoma Constitution’s prohibition against use of public money for sectarian purposes (Art. II, § 5). Third, they claim that the Scholarship Act violates the Oklahoma Constitution’s requirement that the State establish and maintain a system of public schools (Art. I, § 5, and Art. XIII, §. 1). Lastly, they claim that the Scholarship Act violates the Oklahoma Constitution’s prohibition on public funds being gifted or used for a non-public purpose (Art. X, §§ 14, 15). ‘The equal protection claim is easily discarded. Article Il, § 7 of the Oklahoma Constitution creates an individual right that the Oklahoma Supreme Court has explicitly held cannot be vicariously asserted on behalf of Oklahoma students. As aresult, the School Districts lack standing to bring the claim, However, even assuming they had standing, the Scholarship Act does not treat similarly-situated children differently, and even if it did, the State certainly has a rational basis for doing so. The School Districts’ second claim also fails as a matter of law. Article Il, § 5’s prohibition is not nearly as absolute as the School Districts claim. There are numerous examples of state funds being spent at religious institutions, and so long as the state funds are used for a public purpose and the State receives adequate consideration for the funds provided, the expenditures are generally viewed as permissible. Here, the public purposes underlying the education of Oklahoma children 3with disabilities are obvious, and the State receives valuable consideration for the scholarship monies. Thus, the Scholarship Act does not violate Art. II, § 5 in any instance, but just as importantly, it does not violate Art. II, § 5 in every instance, which is what the School Districts must prove to win their facial challenge. The School Districts admit in their statement of undisputed facts that three of the five sets of Parents use their scholarship monies at non-religious private schools, {ipso facto, the Scholarship Act does not violate Art. Il, § 5 in every instance. The third claim fails as well. The School Districts ignore the fact that the Legislature does not look to the Oklahoma Constitution to find out what it can do. Rather the Legislature looks to the Oklahoma Constitution only to find out what it is prohibited from doing, and those prohibitions are narrowly construed. Article I, § 5, and Art. XII, § 1 are mandatory provisions, not prohibitory provisions. They require the State to maintain a system of free public schools, but they do not prevent the State from taking other actions relating to the education of Oklahoma children. ‘The fourth claim fares no better. Of course educating Oklahoma children with disabilities is public purpose, and paying for that education cannot be a “gift” when the child would otherwise ‘be educated by the School Districts and when the scholarship monies “buys” the State regulatory control over private schools that it otherwise would not have. Because the State is receiving adequate consideration for the scholarship monies, the scholarship monies are not “gifts” in any sense of the word—and certainly not any more so than are the numerous state-funded scholarships awarded to graduating seniors each year. ‘The district court below provided no analysis of these four claims, but rather declared the Scholarship Act unconstitutional from the bench, without specifying which constitutional provision the court believed was violated, and without explaining how any offending provisions were not severable, The court perhaps relied on the arguments offered by the School Districts at the summary 4judgment hearing, which centered around two broad themes: (1) that the Scholarship Act actually harmed sectarian institutions, by allowing those institutions to be regulated by the State, and (2) that the Scholarship Act “took money away” from public school districts, to the detriment of those districts’ students. Ifthe district court relied on those arguments, iterred in doing so. The School Districts have no standing to vicariously assert Establishment Clause claims on behalf of sectarian institutions not before the court, Even if they did, the Establishment Clause is not implicated by a law that only regulates sectarian institutions who voluntarily choose to be so regulated. Second, the notion that the Scholarship Act “takes money away” from public school districts is rooted in a fundamental misunderstanding of the way the Scholarship Act works. Public school districts do not /ose money asa result of the Scholarship Act. Rather, they simply lose the State funding that they would have received for a student that they are no longer financially responsible for educating —for the School Districts, itis a zero-sum game. . ‘The most troubling aspect of the District Court’s decision, however, is that it utterly failed to articulate how the scholarships provided to disabled children through the Scholarship Act are Jegally distinguishable from the host of college scholarships provided by the State to graduating high school seniors each year—scholarships that can be applied to the college or university of the student’s choosing, whether sectarian or otherwise. Those scholarship programs illustrate a long- standing, and widely-accepted State policy of allowing State dollars to be spent at sectarian institutions so that the State’s children can realize the “the immeasurable social, psychological and economic value of an education in contemporary society.” The District Court's decision should be reversed.Arguments and Authorities I. The District Court erred by failing to find that the School Districts lack standing to vicariously assert alleged violations of an individual right held by Oklahoma students, and by failing to find that even if the School Districts had standing, the Scholarship Act does not deny any Oklahoma student equal protection of the law. ‘The school districts lack standing to assert equal protection claims on behalf of their students, The Oklahoma Supreme Court has held as much in at least one recent case. In Oklahoma Education Ass'n. v. State, 2007 OK 30, 158 P.3d 1058, the Oklahoma Education Association (the OBA) and several schoo! districts (including Jenks) sued the State of Oklahoma, claiming that the Oklahoma Legislature had failed to adequately fund public education in violation of Oklahoma students’ equal protection rights (amongst other claims). The Oklahoma Supreme Court flatly rejected the OEA’s and school districts" attempt to assert a claim based on the equal protection rights of Oklahoma students: ‘The Appellees assert injury to the rights of Oklahoma's students. The OBA has not established that any of its members are Oklahoma students. Although some of the members of the OEA may be parents of Oklahoma students, this is insufficient to establish the OBA‘ standing to assert injury to the students' rights. The OEA has failed to meet its burden to show that any of its members have a right of their own to assert injury to the rights of Oklahoma's students. As the OEA's_members_cannot_vicariously _assert injury to the constitutional rights of Oklahoma's students, neither can the OEA....[likewise] [t]he Appellee school districts have failed to present us with any authority to_ show that they have standing to assert the violation of the constitutional rights of students generally across this state. Id, at] 12, 14, 1064 (emphasis added).‘ustas in that case, the School Districts here are attempting to vicariously assert injury to the constitutional rights of Oklahoma students, As a result, the Schools Districts lack standing to assert claims based on those rights.* ‘Additionally, even if the School Districts had standing to vicariously assert an equal protection claim, the Scholarship Act does not treat similarly-situated children differently. The children who are eligible for a scholarship under the Scholarship Act (those with an Individualized Education Plan who also meet other criteria) are quite obviously differently situated from those children who are not eligible for an Individualized Education Plan. The very reason Congress passed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 ef seq. with its Individual Education Plans was because children eligible for such plans are differently situated than those on accommodation plans under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794. If Congress is not guilty of an equal protection violation for distinguishing between children with disabilities in its two pieces of legislation, the Oklahoma Legislature certainly cannot be for relying on that classification in the Scholarship Act. Lastly, even if the Scholarship Act was construed as treating similarly-situated children differently, the State certainly has a rational basis for doing so—and that is all that is required for the Scholarship Act to survive an equal protection challenge. If there is any reasonably conceivable set of facts that could provide a rational basis for the classification, that classification is constitutional. Gladstone v. Bartlesville Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 30,2003 OK 30 at { 12, 66 P.34 442, 447. The legislature is not required to set out the bases on which they rationally relied. However, > Parens patriae standing cannot generally be asserted by a state to challenge the an act of the federal government, the notion being that the federal government is just as much a “parent” of the citizens as isthe State. See Massachusetts v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923). Similar logic would apply to a school district attempting to challenge actions taken by the State, Such a challenge must be brought by the affected citizen, not an inferior governmental entity.some possible examples are (1) that those students who have undergone the process to be placed on TEP have been sufficiently evaluated for participation in the program to be beneficial, or (2) perhaps the cost of funding the scholarships for all students with disabilities was beyond the State’s ability to pay, or (3) the currently eligible students may be used to determine whether the program is effective. Each of these bases (and the many others not listed) is rational, non-invidious, related to the State’s purpose of educating children, and therefore satisfactory. ‘The legislature only needs one. ‘The Scholarship Act thus clearly survives rational basis review. I ‘The District Court erred because the School Districts failed to establish that no set of circumstances exist under which the Scholarship Act does not violate Art. II, § 5. Because the School Districts brought facial challenge to the constitutionality of a state statute, they have an extraordinarily high burden of proof. In fact, they have placed on themselves the highest of litigational burdens. Davis v. Fieker, 1997 OK 156 § 35, 952 P.2d 505, 514 (“A facial challenge toa Legislative Actis, of course, the most difficult challenge to mount successfully, since the challenger must establish that no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid.”); quoting United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S.739, 745 (1987). Quite frankly, the playing field is, as a matter of law, severely tilted in the Parents’ favor. Fent v. Okla. Capitol Improvement ‘Authority, 1999 OK 64 4 3, 984 P.2d 200, 204 (“[Every presumption is to be indulged in favor of the constitutionality of a statute"); Schmitt v. Hunt, 1960 OK 257 4 6, 359 P.2d 198 (A legislative act must be upheld unless “its unconstitutionality is shown beyond a reasonable doubt.”); E. Okla. Bldg. & Const, Trades Council v. Pitts, 2003 OK 113 { 14, 82 P.3d 1008, 1014 (“[Courts] are obliged to preserve the constitutionality of enactments where possible, not overturn them.”). ‘The School Districts cannot meet this burden of proof as to any claim in their petition, but they certainly cannot meet it as to the first claim because they admit in their statement of facts thatthree of the five sets of Parents apply their scholarship monies towards tuition at a non-religious private school. See Pls.’ Mot. at 8-10. Thus, they cannot prevail on their claim that in every instance, the Scholarship Act provides public funds to sectarian institutions. Their facial challenge accordingly fails. ‘A. The scholarship monies provided under the Scholarship Act serve the very public purpose of educating Oklahoma school children with disabil But even assuming this is an as-applied challenge to the Scholarship Act, the two sets of Parents who apply their scholarship monies towards tuition at religious schools do not violate Art. Tl, § 5 because the scholarship monies serve a public purpose and the State receives valuable consideration for those monies. The School Districts incorrectly describe Art. II, § 5 as an absolute prohibition on the use of state money at religious institutions. Reality is hardly so black and white. In fact, there are ‘numerous ways in which state funds benefit religious institutions and organizations. For example: Through SoonerCare (Oklahoma’s Medicaid program), the State of Oklahoma spent $1.7 billion in 2011 providing health benefit packages to qualifying Oklahomans. ‘Those 1.7 billion SoonerCare dollars are spent at authorized providers throughout the state—a host of which are religiously- affiliated. See SoonerCare provider list, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. (listing, for example, Mercy Hospital, a hospital whose mission “js rooted in the mission of Jesus and the healing ministry of the church[.]” See hitp://www.mereyok.net/mhc/ourministry/defaultasp, a hardeopy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 2). © Through various state-funded scholarship programs administered by the State Regents for Higher Education, college scholarships are awarded to Oklahoma students to be applied at either public or private colleges and universities—many of which are religious institutions. See http:/Avww.okcollegestart.org/Financial_Aid/Types_of Aid/Scholarships/ State_Scholarship_Programs/_ default.aspx, a hardcopy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 3.* Through the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, state funds administered by the Department of Human Services are spent in support of a variety of religious institutions. See http://www faithlinksok.org/Priorities.htm, a hardcopy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 4; see also 2008 OK AG 10. The district court utterly failed to articulate how the scholarships provided to disabled children through the Scholarship Act are legally distinguishable from these programs, particularly the host of college scholarships provided by the State to graduating high school seniors each year—scholarships that can be applied to the college or university ofthe student’s choosing, whether sectarian or otherwise. Ina recent Indiana case, a state court upheld Indiana’s analogous “Choice Scholarship Program” in part because: interpreting [Indiana's Constitution] to prohibit program like the CSP ‘would cast doubt on the validity ofa host of longtime religion-neutral state programs whereby taxpayer funds are ultimately paid to religious institutions by way of individual choice. For example, the State Student Assistance Commission of Indiana administers post- secondary grant programs...that permit students to use state scholarships to attend private religious schools. Meredith etal. v. Daniels et al.,*9, Marion Superior Court, Civil Division, Cause No. 49D07-1107- PL-025402 (Jan. 13, 2012).* The Indiana court concluded that the Choice Scholarship Program did not violate the Indiana Constitution’s Article 1, Section 6, which prohibits state funds from being spent “for the benefit of any religious or theological institution” because “the CSP is not in place “for the benefit’ of religious schools, To the contrary, the CSP bestows benefits onto scholarship recipients who may then choose to use the funding for education at a public, secular private, or religious private school. Therefore, the CSP does not violate Article 1, Section 6.” Id. Clearly, the Indiana court appreciated what the district court here utterly failed to appreciate: that programs like this do not violate “no aid” provisions in state constitutions, and that reading them “A copy is attached for the Court’s convenience. 10as violating those provisions ignores long-standing, and widely-accepted state policies of allowing state dollars to be spent at sectarian institutions for educational benefits. ‘The School Districts cite several outdated attorney general opinions (the most recent being over three decades old) in support of their hard-line reading of Art. Il, § 5. Not surprisingly they ignore the most recent, and most on-point, attorney general opinion analyzing Art. II, § 5. In 2008, the Attorney General was asked to opine on the constitutionality of the Transformational Justice Act, 2007 Okla. Sess. Laws ch. 274, §§ 1 - 3, which authorized public funds to be used by the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives to provide support to faith-based groups for specified services. 2008 OK AG 10. The Attorney General concluded that the statute was facially sound, reasoning as follows: ‘Although the language of Article Il, Section 5 of Oklahoma's Constitution would ‘appear to prohibit payment of public funds to a sectarian institution, such is not the case. The Oklahoma Supreme Court has found payments to a sectarian institution for a public purpose and for adequate consideration does not violate Article II, Section 5, See, e.g., Murrow Indian Orphans Home v. Childers, 171 P.24 600, 603 (Okla. 1946). In Sharp v. City of Guthrie, 152 P. 403 (Okla. 1915), the court upheld a conveyance of property to a sectarian institution that was to be used as a university. Id. at 408. ‘The court said the conveyance was for a public purpose and the value of the university to the city and the obligations and responsibilities assumed by the institution were sufficient consideration to uphold the conveyance. Id. The court said: The city having the right to sell the property, and the consideration being adequate, it would make no difference whether the grantee be sectarian institution or not, for a sale upona sufficient consideration would not be within the prohibition of section 5, art. 2, of the ‘Constitution. Id. ulIn Children's Home and Welfare Association v. Childers, 171 P.24613 (Okla. 1946), decided the same day as Murrow Indian Orphans Home, the Oklahoma Supreme Court found payments to sectarian institutions did not violate Section 5 of Article II of Oklahoma's Constitution. Id. at 614, The payments to residential children’s homes for the care of orphan, dependent children, pursuant to contracts with the State Board of Affairs did not violate Article Il, Section 5 of Oklahoma's Constitution because the payments were for a public purpose and the State received adequate consideration for payments to the institution in the form of the care of needy children, which the State had a duty to provide. Murrow Indian Orphans Home, 171 P.2d at 603. ‘The analysis of a state-aid program under Article Il, Section 5 is virtually identical to the analysis utilized by the courts in determining the constitutionality ofa state-aid program under Article X, Sections 14(A) and 15 of the Oklahoma Constitution. A state-aid program will survive a constitutional challenge if state aid is for a public se and the State receives adequate consideration for the aid provided. We have found the Scholarship Act's provision for grants o volunteer organizations, including faith-based organizations, to provide health, educational or vocational training, and programs to assist reintegration of inmates does not, on its face, violate Article X, Sections 14(A) and 15 of the Oklahoma Constitution. Therefore, the Scholarship ‘Act's provision for grants does not on its face violate Article Il, Section 5 of the Constitution. ld. The Attomey General’s opinion describes the correct analysis. The question is thus whether providing scholarships to Oklahoma school children with disabilities serves a public purpose, and whether the State receives adequate consideration for the scholarship monies. B. ‘The scholarship monies provided under the Scholarship Act serve the very public purpose of educating Oklahoma school children with disabilities. “The expenditure of public funds at a private entity requires accomplishment of a public purpose with appropriate controls over activities of the private entity receiving payment. Way v. Grand Lake Ass'n, 1981 OK 70 § 40, 635 P.2d 1010, 1018, Here, there is no doubt that the education of Oklahoma children with disabilities is a public purpose, and the Scholarship Act contains more than adequate controls over the Scholarship Activities of the schools receiving the 2scholarship monies. See 70 O.S. § 13-101.2(H) (setting forth detailed criteria that a school must meet in order to be approved under the Scholarship Act, and giving the State Department of Education oversight over such schools.), The public purpose analysis begins with the State's obligation to educate students appropriately. Oklahoma law mandates that the state provide special education and related programs to children with disabilities. The legislature has determined that the best way to accomplish this objective is to allow the parents of such children to determine where their child will receive the most beneficial education. When the legislature determines that there is a public purpose to be achieved, it shall only be reversed upon a clear showing that it was arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. State ex rel. Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 1997 OK 117, 4 18, 946 P.2d 1140, 1144. C. The State of Oklahoma receives valuable consideration in exchange for the scholarship monies. "Consideration may be measured by benefit to one party or by forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility assumed by the other party." Burkhardt v. City of Enid 1989 OK 45 913,771 P.2d 608, 611. So where the State receives property or services in return for payment of its money, itis not a prohibited "gift." Childrens Home & Welfare Ass'n v. Childers, 1946 OK 180 4 5, 171 P.2d 613, 614. Here, a disabled child is only eligible to receive scholarship monies under the Scholarship ‘Act if, “{tJhe student has spent the prior school year in attendance at a public school in this state.” 70 OS. § 13-101.2(B)(1). So under the Scholarship Act, any child who receives a scholarship is a child that the State is currently responsible for educating. Any scholarship monies paid under the Scholarship Act are thus paid in exchange for the State being relieved of its obligation to provide 13an education for that child. That is adequate consideration. The scholarship monies thus cannot be considered a “gift” in any sense of the word. Additionally, the State receives greater certainty in both education costs for each child and some regulatory control over the private school that it otherwise would not have. The State receives consideration in the form of parent’s full financial responsibility for the education of the student. Once the scholarship monies are dispensed, the State also receives consideration from the educators in the form of educational services and through compliance with statutory requirements and other qualifications. Thus, the State receives more than adequate consideration. Ill. The district court erred because nothing in the Scholarship Act impairs the State’s maintenance of a system of free public schools. Art. I, § 5, and Art, XIIL, § 1 are commands to the Legislature, nor limitations on the Legislature's power. School Dist. No. 62 Craig County v. School Dist. No. 17 Craig County, 1930 OK 112,287P. 1035. Unlike the United States Constitution, which vests Congress with enumerated powers, under Oklahoma's Constitution "we do not look to the Constitution to determine whether the Legislature is authorized to do an act but rather to see whether itis prohibited." Draper v. State, 1980 OK 117 4 10, 621 P.2d 1142, 1146. Additionally, restrictions and limitations upon the Legislature's power are to be "construed strictly." Jd. And, if there is any doubt as to the Legislature's power to act in any given situation, the doubt is to be resolved in favor of the validity of the Scholarship Action taken by the Legislature. See id. Lastly, "[iJt is only where an act of the Legislature is clearly, palpably, and plainly inconsistent with the terms and provisions of the Constitution that the courts will interfere and 4declare such act invalid and void." Adwonv. Okla. Retail Grocers Ass'n, 1951 OK 43 4 13, 228 P.2d 376, 379 (quotation omitted). ‘Accordingly, no Oklahoma court has ever construed Art. I, § 5, and Art. XIIL, § 1 as prohibiting the Legislature from taking actions so long as the Legislature is satisfying its constitutional duty of maintaining a system of free public schools. Here, the School Districts make no allegation that the Legislature has failed to maintain a system of five public schools. And how could they? The very fact that the School Districts exist, and are here suing these parents, proves that the Legislature has fulfilled its constitutional duty as to them, Because the School Districts do not, and cannot, claim that the Scholarship Act has caused the Legislature to abrogate its duty to maintain a system of public schools, the School District's third claim fails. IV. The district court erred because the State receives adequate consideration in exchange for the scholarship monies, which means they are not “gifts.” Determining whether a legislative act violates Art. X, § 15's prohibition of “gifts” turns on the presence of adequate consideration. Hawks v. Bland, 1932 OK 101 § 22, 9 P.2d 720, 722 ("A sift within the meaning of this section is a gratuitous transfer of the property of the state voluntarily and without consideration."). As explained above, the State receives adequate consideration in exchange for the scholarship monies granted under the Scholarship Act. Thus, claim four cannot be used to invalidate the Scholarship Act. V. To the extentit relied on the reasoning offered by the School Districts at oral argument, the district court erred. ‘The School Districts claim that the Scholarship Act harms sectarian schools by allowing them to be regulated by the State, an argument seemingly rooted in the federal constitution’s 15Establishment Clause. The School Districts of course lack standing to vicariously assert this claim on behalf of the sectarian institutions who voluntarily participate in the Scholarship Program, and ‘who fully support that program. But even if the School Districts had standing, the Establishment Clause is not implicated when a sectarian institution voluntarily subjects itself to State regulation. ‘And to be clear, every religious school that participates in the Scholarship Program is doing so voluntarily—if they do not wish to be subject to the regulations imposed by the Scholarship Program, they may opt out. The School Districts also assert that the Scholarship Act takes money away from public schools to the detriment of other students. This is factually inaccurate. Under the Scholarship Act the public school is not losing any funding for its general student population. ‘The funds being diverted are those that would have been expended on the individual child with the disability. In exchange the public school is no longer financially responsible for educating that child, and is therefore in no worse financial position because of the Scholarship Act. Conclusion ‘The Oklahoma Constitution tasks the legislature with the responsibility of educating the state's children, and special attention must be paid to the unique needs of children with disabilities. “The legislature has responded to this need by apportioning those children scholarship monies that enable them to receive a more tailored and effective education, benefitting both the children and the State, For these reasons, the Court should reverse the District Court’s judgment, and confirm the Scholarship Act as a constitutional exercise of the Legislature’s authority. Tronically enough, a common complaint of public school districts is that the State does not provide them enough funding to cover their actual cost of educating a child. If so, the Schoo! Districts can hardly claim financial detriment as a result of the Scholarship Act. 16Respectfully submitted, ae Patrick R. Wyrick, OBA #21874 Solicitor General Oklahoma Attomey General 313 NE 21" Street Oklahoma City, OK 73105 (405) 522-4448 (405) 522-0669 patrick. wyrick@oag.ok.gov Attomey for Appellants CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Thereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Petition in Error was mailed this 14% day of June, 2012 by depositing it in the U.S. Mails, postage prepaid to the following: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES J, Douglas Mann, OBA #5663 Karen L. Long, OBA #5510 Frederick J. Hegenbart, OBA #10846 Jerry A. Richardson, OBA #10455 ROSENSTEIN, FIST & RINGOLD 525 S. Main, Suite 700 Tulsa, OK 74103 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS Andrew W. Lester, OBA #5388 Matt Hopkins, OBA #16666 Carrie L. Vaughn, OBA #21866 Lester, Loving & Davies, P.C. 1701 South Kelly Ave. Edniond, OK 73013 and — a7Bobby L. Latham, Jr, OBA #15799 Lance Freije, OBA #18559 LATHAM, WAGNER, STEELE & LEHMAN, P.C. 10441 S. Regal Blvd., Suite 200 Tulsa, OK 74133 —and— Eric S. Baxter Eric C. Rassbach Eric N. Kniffin THE BECKETT FUND FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY 3000 K St. NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20007 18STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION SUPERIOR COURT )SS: CIVIL DIVISION, ROOM NO. 7 COUNTY OF MARION ) CAUSE NO, 49D07-1107-PL-025402 ‘TERESA MEREDITH, DR. EDWARD E. EILER, RICHARD E. HAMILTON, SHELLA KENNEDY, GLENDA RIIZ, REV. MICHAEL JONES, DR. ROBERT M. STWALLEY Ill, KAREN J. COMBS, REV. KEVIN ARMSTRONG, DEBORAH J. PATTERSON, KEITH GAMBILL, and JUDITH LYNN FAILER, FILEL @ JAN 13 202 at wld Plaintifs, % Governor of Indiana; and DR. TONY BENNETT, in his official capacity as Indiana Superintendent of Public Instruction and Director of the Indiana Department of Education, Defendants, and HEATHER COFFY AND MONICA, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MITCH DANIELS, in his official capacity as ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) } POINDEXTER, ) ) Defendant-Intervenors. ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DEFENDANTS AND DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS Plaintiffs have brought this litigation cullenging the constituionality, under several provisions of the Indiana Constitution, of the Choice Scholarship Program (CSP) enacted by the 2011 Indiana General Assembly. The matter is now before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Defendant Storer” ‘Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant Jatervenors’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Upon considerstion f the submissions and arguments of counsel, this Coutt determines snore appropHiately decided on summaty judgment, end the Court finds that there that thi aretss6eg . euss-220-21 Sb:9r 2T0R-T-Ner >{sno genuine issue as to any materiel fact and that Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors are entitled to judgment asa matter of law on all of Plaintiffs claims forthe reasons set forth below. LEGAL CONCLUSIONS summary Judgment Standar ‘A motion for summary judgment must be denied unless “the evidence shows no ‘genuine Jue of material fact and Ghe moving party is eniled to judgment as a matter of law.” Travelers Indem. Co, of Am. y.Jarrels, 927 N.E.24 374, 376 (Ind. 2010) (iting Ind Trial Rule '56{C)). The trial court must “construc al factual inferences in the nonmmoving party's favor and resolve ul doubts as to the existence ofa material issue against the moving party.” id. stautes come to the courts “clothed with the presumption of constitutional.” Bunker Nat'l Gypsum Co., 441 N.E.24 8, 11 (Ind. 1982) (quoting Sidle v. Majors, 341 N.E.2d 763, 766 (ind. 1976). “[T}he burden to rebut this presumption is upon any challenger and all reasonable doubts must be resolved in favor ofan act's constitutionalty.” Id (citing Dague » Piper Aircraft Corp, 418 N.E.24 207,214 (Id. 1981)). Overcoming such a burden is partculrly difficult na facial challenge such as this, where the Plantifis must demonstrate that spo set of circumstances” exists “under which the statutes] can be constitutionally applied.” Baldwin v, Reagan, 715 N.E.24 332, 337 (ind. 1999). Degree of Religiosity ‘The Court notes thatthe only new argument before it from either side, since the Order denying Plaintits? Motion for Preiminary Injunction, entered on August 15, 2011, pertains to the degree of religiosity ~ the extent to which religion is pervasive - ofthe religious schools ~ that participate in the program. The Court hotds that whether the religious schools in the CSP are pervasively sectarian is immaterial. CSP recipients have a choice a5 10 which school 10 ararsera zecg-e2e-LIEWwOIs — SbIST Btaz-LT-NEattend, religious or non-eligious. If parent wishes fo send her cbild to a “pervasively sectarian” institution, then that is her choice. ‘The precise degree of religiosity of schools participating in the CSP has no bearing on the program's vonstitutionality, Additionally, determining tho degree of religiosity of @ religious school is disfavored because it requires courts to sorutinize the religious views of an institution and to make subjective judgments on the role of religion within the school. See, eg, Mitchell v. Helms, 530 US. 793, 828 (2000) (plurality opinion) (TfIhe inquiry into the recipient’s religious views required by a focus on whether a school is pervasively sectarian is not only unnecessary but also offensive, It is well established, in numerous other contexts, that courts should refrain from trolling through a person's or institution’ religious beliefs.”) “This Court therefore concludes that the degree of religiosity of the participating schools is immaterial to the case at hand. Article 8, Section 1 Article 8, Section 1 of the Indiana Constitution, provides as follows: Knowledge and leaning, genetally diffused throughout a community, being essential t0 the preservation of a free goverment; it shall be the duty of the General Assembly to encourage, by all suitable means, moral, intellectual, scientific, and agricultural improvement; and to provide, by law for a goneral and uniform system of Common Schools, wherein tuition shall be without charge, and equally open to all. ‘This provision bestows two duties upon the General Assembly ~ to encourage ‘education “by all suitable means” and to require “a general and uniform system of Common Schools, wherein tuition shall be without charge, and equally open to al.” ‘Thus, the overall command to the General Assembly is to encourage learning “by all suitable means,” including, but not limited to, provision of a uniform and general system ‘of common schools. ererseed BISG-220-LTE203 — SbIST BTOR-ET-NUEIn Bonner ex rel. Bonner v. Daniels, 907 NE.2d 516, $18 (Ind. 2009), the Court deemed issues of education policy authorized by the General and Uniform Clause to be political questions off limits to judicial intervention, ‘The Court held that, to the extent there is “a right, catitlement, of priviloge to pursue public education, any such right derives from enactments of the General Assembly, not from the Indiana Constitution.” Jd, et $22, The Court also made clear that “the text of the Education Clause expresses two duties of the Geveral Assembly.” Ihe first duty being “to encourage moral, intellectual, scientific, and agricultural improvement,” and the second “is the duty to provide for a general and uniform system of open common schools without tuition.” Jd at 520, These duties exist separately, and the second duty should not be seen as the only ‘means to carry out the first duty, Further, the history of the times suggests that the 1850 convention delegates did rot view the General and Uniform Clause as implying any restriction on other “suitable means” by which the General Assembly might “encourage . . . morel, intellectual, scientific and agricultural improvement.” Ind. Const. Article 8, § 1. Shortly after the adoption of the 1851 Indiana Constitution, the General Assembly created the Indiana public school system, but did not reverse the longstanding policy of financing private schools. See generally Act of June 14, 1852, 1852 Ind. Rev. Stat. ch. 98. In fact, the School Law of 1855 permitted cities and towns to “recognize any school, seminary, or other institution of learning, which has been or may be erected by private enterprise, as part of thei system, and to make such appropriation of finds . .. as unay be deemed proper” Act of March 5, 1855, § 2, 38th Gen. Assemb,, Rey, Sess. 1855 Ind, Acts ch. 87, aryiseeg 2uSs-L2E-LIEWwOIy —-AbIST BTBR-ET-NOEBased on the text and structure of Arficle & Section 1, and the history of cedveationsl funding in Indiana, the Court concludes the CSP does not violate Article 8, Section 1, and the “all suitable means” clause authorizes educational options outside of the public school system. Article 1, Seetion 4 Article 1, Section 4 of the Indiana Constitution, provides, “No preference shall be given, by lw, to any ered, religious society, oF mode of worship; and no person shall be compelled fo attend, erect, or support, any place of worship, or fo maintain any ministry, against his consent.” ‘Antcle 1, Section 4°s prohibition of compelled “support” for “any place of worship” or “ministry” does not esti the stato from oreating a program under which general tax revennes are given to a private citizen who may then choose to use those funds o pay tition a religious schools, “The history and structure ofthe Indiana Bill of Rights suggest that Section 4's protection seninst being “compelled to support any place of worship” is less about resticting the goverment’ use of general tax revenues and more about protecting citizens from forced thing cor other similar government-cocreed direct, individual support for churches or ministries Specifically, Article 1, Section 6 of the Indiana Constitution sets forth restrictions agaist using general tax revenues “for the benofit of religous institutions” Holding that Article 1, Secon 4 provides similar protection agsinst religious establishment would be structurally suspect becuse there would not have been a need forthe drafters of the 1851 Constitution to supplement Section 4 by adding the browder language of Section 6, See Jackson v. Benson, 578 N.W.24 602, 622-23 (Wis, 1998) (“We will not interpret the compelled support clause as prohibiting the same acts as those prohibited by the benefits clause. Rather we look for an interpretation of these two related er/siased ZISS-J2E-LTEIWOI —_Lb:9T 2TOR-ET-NEEprovisions that avoids such redundancy.”); see also Hendricks v. State, 196 N.E.2d 66, 70 (ind 1964) (“One of the fundamental rules of constitutional construction is that no word shall be assumed to be mere surplusage.”). Moreover, during the period 1816-1850, when Indiana's first constitution was in foree, taxpayer funds were commonly used to fund private religious schools. See Ar. 5, § 116, 1843 Ind. Rey. Stat. ch. 15, This is significant because the 1816 Indiana Constitution contained @ clause materially identical to today's Article 1, Section 4. See Ind. Const. of 1816, art. 1, § 3 (“ao man shal! be compelled to attend, erect, or support any place of Worship, oo maintain any ‘inistry against his consent”). The historical record thus makes clear that citizens of that era did not view the restriction against coereed support to apply 10 use of general tax revenues, Forthermore, the Ohio und Wisconsin Supreme Courts rejected constitutional challenges under their compelled support clauses — which con in language very similar to that of Article 1, Section 4 — to publicly funded scholarship programs like the CSP. See Simmons-Harris v. Gaff. 711 NB.2d 203, 211-12 (Ohio 1999); Jackson v. Benson, $78 N.W.24 602, 623 (Wis. 1998) “Additionally, the Pennsylvania Supreme Coutt has held that that state’s compelled support clause __ which is a model for and has very similar language to Section 4 — does not bar aid to children who attend religious schools, Springfield Sch. Dist. v. Dep't of Edue., 397 A.2d 1154, 1170 (Pa. 1979). ‘This Court therefore concludes that Article 1, Section 4 does not preclude the ust of general fax revenues 10 fond scholarships thet may be used, atthe disoretion of scholarship recipients, to pay for education at religious schools. erg:aeed ZISS-L2E-2TEWWO4y —GHIGT BTG2-ET-NUEAt lc 1, Section ‘Article 1, Section 6 of the Indiana Constitution, provides that “[nJo money shall be drawn. from the treasury, for the benefit of any religious or theological institution,” The most pertinent Indiana Supreme Court discussion of Section 6 is Embry v. O'Bannon, 198 N.E.24 157 (Ind, 2003). There, the Court upheld “dual enrollment” programs whereby parochial school students would also enroll in local public schools, and those public schools would then provide secular education services, including the teaching of secular subjects by teachers paid with public funds, to the dual enrolled students a the parochial schools. The Court ruled as it did in Embry in light of the religion-neutral nature of the programs, the “obvious significant educational bencfits” 0 Indiana children and the “benefit (to) the State by furthering its objective to encourage education e ‘The benefits that parochial schools received from the program ~ including cost-savings forall Indiana students,” Embry, 798 N.E.2d at 167 (opinion of Dickson, and curriculum expansion that allowed them to enroll more studonts ~ were “incidental” when. compared to the overarching educational benefits the program provided. See id Embry focused ‘on whether the benefits the schools received were incidental to the accomplishment of the state's Droader educational purposes, rather than on whether those benefits crossed some subjective threshold from insignificant to substuntial, Specifically, the Court stated that “[cJorupared with the substantial educational benefits to children . . . we find any alleged ‘savings’ to parochial schools and their resulting opportunities for curriculum expansion would be, at best, relatively minor and incidental benefits of the dual-enrollment programs.” Id. Like the dual enrollment program in Embry, the CSP is religion-neutral and was enacted “for the benefit” of students, not religious institutions or activities. Additionally, the CSP is ‘based on individual choice of each scholarship recipient's parents. ‘The program permits any ere:e6ed BESS-220-2TE:00V3 BIT 21A2-ET-NUEprivate or public school that requires a student to pay tution or transfer tuition to be eligible to accept CSP scholarships as payment, and also permits taxpayer funds to be paid as tuition to religious schools only upon private, individual choices of parents, Ind. Code § 20-15-1-4.7. See ‘also Jackson, 578 N.W.2d at 621 (“public funds may be placed at the disposal of third parties so Jong as the program on its face is neutral between sectarian and nonsectarian alternatives and the . The CSP docs transmission of funds is guided by the independent decisions of third parties not guarantee direct benefit to participating schools at all, untike the dual-enroliment program; rather, only eligible students have @ guaranteed benefit that their parents cun, by exercising individual choice in a program open to both public and private schools, use to pay for them to attend any participating school, Therefore, the cost-savings and curriculum expansion benefits 0 religious schools are incidental to parents choosing to provide their children with a religious education. Furthermore, other states that have the precise “for the benefit” language contained in Section 6 have allowed similur situations of tax reverwes being used for the benefit of students’ education with incidental benefits to religious schools, See Juckson, 578 N.W.2¢ at 620-21 {interpreting the Wisconsin analogue to Section 6 as allowing Milwaukee's Parental Choice Scholarship Program, a program similar in legal structure to the CSP, although limited to one city); Advisory Opinion re Constitutionalty of P-A. 1970, No. 100, 180 N.W.2d 265, 274 (1970) (holding the Michigan analogue to Section 6 to allow Michigan to pay teachers with state finds to teach secular subjects in religious schools). States that have held differently have significant differences between their state constitutions and Section 6 of the Indiana Constitution. See, eg. Larue ¥. Colorado Baord of Education, No, tlov4424 (Aug. 12, 2011) (holding that the Colorado Constitution prohibits public funds to help sustain any school controlled by any church arerseed BISS-L2E-LTEWONs — GIST BTOR-ET-NUEor sectarian denomination, where Colorado's “no aid” clause is very different from Indiana's Section 6). Finally, interpreting Article 1, Section 6 to prohibit programs like the CSP would cast doubt on the validity of a host of other longtime religion-neutral state programs whereby taxpayer funds are ultimately paid to religious institutions by way of individual choice. For ‘example, the State Snident Assistance Commission of Indiana administers post-secondary grant programs, including the Frank O"Baunon Grant Program and the Twenty-First Century Scholars Program, that permit stuceuts to use state scholarships to uttend private religious schools. ‘This Court concludes that the CSP is not in place “for the benefit” of religious schools. To the contrary, the CSP bestows benelits onto scholarship recipients who may then choose (0 use the funding for education at a public, secular private, or religious private school. Therefore, the CSP docs not violate Article 1, Section 6 ORDER IT I$ THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant to Indiana ‘Trial Rule $6, Plaintifs' Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby DENIED and Defendant- Imtervenors’ Motion for Summary Judgment is hercby GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court centers judgment in favor of the Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors on all of Plaintiffs’ claims, Date: Panarciye L522 O%e2 BricAeesdels fiat ke Fudge} Marion Superior C Civil Division, Room 7 arciteed Biss-22E-LEOS — GHIDT 2TOR-ET-NOLDistribution: ‘Andrew W. Hull Alice M. Morical HOOVER HULL LLP P.O. Box 44989 Indianapolis, IN 46244-0989 John M. West Joshua B. Shifrin BREDHOFF & KAISLR, P.LLL. 805 Fiftoenth Street, N.W., Suite 1000 ‘Washington, DC 20005 Alice O'Brien Kristen L. Hollar NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION 1201 16™ Street, N.W. ‘Washington, DC 20036 ‘Thomas M. Fisher Asbley Tatman Harwel Heather Hagan MeVeigh Office of the Attorney General IGC South, Fifth Floor 302 W, Washington Street Indpls.,IN 46204 William H, Mellor Robert W. Gall Richard D. Komer 901 N, Glebe Road, Suite 900 Arlington, VA 22203 J.1ee McNeely McNEELY STEPHENSON THOPY & ITARROLD 2150 Intelliplex Drive, Suite 100 Shelbyville, IN 46176-8547 10 arated zass-2en-2te 10043 eS:9r 21@2-£7-NoEWe oklahoma health care authority Medical Home Providers by County and Specialty, Benton (AR) . Crawford (AR) Sebastian (AR). Horigemery (8 Sonatd (KS) Sumner (KS) Adar Aaa Atoka Beaver. Bookham Canadian. Carter... Cherokee. Choctaw . Cimarron, Cleveland Coal... Comanche Cotton, Cra Crest Custer. Delaware Dewey Garfield. Garvin Grady Grant Greer Harmon Harper Haskell Hughes - Jackson Jefferson Johnston ASS command drdoowonnmnn d kay... Kingfisher Kiowa... Latimer Table of Contents Contenido November 28, 2014 Oklahoma Okmulgee -... Pushmataha Roger Mills. Secuoyati Stephens. iatoo Tian Tiss oy Washington. Washts” Woods. Coote (1). oe Rea ver (13) Wibarger (1X) 2 Medical Home FQHC and RHC by County... Adair. 56 Alaa 56 ‘Atoka 56 Beaver 58 Blaine. "58 Bryan 58 Caddo 58 Cherokee «. 56 Choctaw... Cimarron Coal. Comanche Pittsburg Pushmataha Roger Mil. gemini. equoya Sumner (KS)... Tilman Tulsa Wagoner Woods Medical Home IHS/Tribal/Urban Indian Clinies by Tribe Non Indians... Rosentee Shaws ‘Tribe. - Cherokee Naiion Chickasaw Nation Choctaw Nation... ‘Wyandotte Nation Index. 1 85 Index .. 65 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITYBenton (AR) County Medical Home Providers by County and Specialty ‘Medicos por condado y por especialidad ARKANSAS Benton (AR) SILOAM SPRINGS Family Practice O19 Pars of Age BENJAMIN, GEORGE H, MD Provider ID:' 1000735808. 451 S HOLLY ST. SILOAM SPRINGS, AR 72761 (479) 524-3141 CLEMENS, ROY D, MD Provider ID: 100078860A 451 S HOLLY ST SILOAM SPRINGS, AR 72761 (479) 524-3141 DUNCAN, CARL R, MD Provider ID: 1002275304 451 S HOLLY ST SILOAM SPRINGS, AR 72761 (479) 524-3090 MILBURN, KELLY J, ARNP Provider 1D: 200133460 4451S HOLLY ST SILOAM SPRINGS, AR 72761 (479) 524-3141 “Languages ther than English Spanish Family Practice 0-21 Years of Age SPRINGER, DAN J, MD Provider ID:' 1000804308 4451S HOLLY ST SILOAM SPRINGS, AR 72761 (479) 624-3141 STINNETT, SCOTT G, MD Provider ID: 1000807108 451 S HOLLY ST SILOAM SPRINGS, AR 72761 (479) 524-3080 YOUMANS, ROGER W, MD Provider!D; 100108430A 451 S HOLLY ST SILOAM SPRINGS, AR 72761 (479) 5243141 Podiatrics O-14 Years of Age FANGMEIER, ANGELA A, MD jor ID: 1002522408, NPROGRESS AVE SILOAM SPRINGS, AR 72761 (479) 549-4228 Pediatrics 0-18 Years of Age COUCH, YVONNE P, ARNP Provider ID: 200123540A 1101-2 NPROGRESS AVE SILOAM SPRINGS, AR 72761 (479) 549-4228 RAMICK, REBECCA A, MD Provider ID: 200242920 1101-2 N PROGRESS AVE SILOAM SPRINGS, AR 72761 (479) 549-4228 Crawford (AR) ALMA Family Practice 18-99 Years of Age RANA, JAVED A, MD. Provider ID: 2000301404 605 HEATHER LN ALMA, AR 72921 (479) 632.6688 VAN BUREN Family Practice 21-99 Years of Age BAKER, ROBERT R, DO Provider ID: 1002006800 2800 FAYETTEVILLE RO VAN BUREN, AR 72956 (479) 474-3369 Sebastian (AR) FORT SMITH Family Practice 1-99 Years of Age HOANG, NGOC V, MD Provider 1D: 1002230208, 1623 ROGERS AVE, FORT SMITH, AR’ 72901 (479) 782-6318 Pediatrics O-14 Years of Age GABY, CECIL W, MD Provider ID: 1002110200 7303 ROGERS AVE. STE 101 FORT SMITH, AR 72903 (479) 452-7447 KANSAS Montgomery (KS) COFFEYVILLE Family Practice 18-99 Years of Age BLEX, MEGGIN M, ARNP Provider ID: 100199170A 4411 W4TH ST BLDG C. COFFEYVILLE, KS 67337 (620) 21-2400 JONES, JACKLYN S, ARNP Provider ID: 2001350208 1411 W4TH ST BLOGG COFFEYVILLE, KS 67337 (620) 251-2400 NOVEMBER 2011 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITYMedical Home Providers by County and Spt Medicos por condado y por especialidad ecialty Montgomery (KS) County Famly Practice Family Practice OKLAHOMA CORREYVILLE DOCTORS 2 Brovider 1D: 1007224300 Adair ot opast-7500" KS 67337 STILWELL 1-760 Family Practice 2.) a gt ; ote Kany eevee, BALSON, ANAND J, MO BENTLEY, NICHOLAS J, DO BALSON ANAG NE eo PrederD 1002004008 rer) Braye is tapes sae Se sae FER ATES rma STRIVELL OF 74000 BUTLER, WANDA F, ARNP ‘Seward (KS) Provider (0: 2000919408 Tae Seeer LIBERAL ‘STILWELL, OK 74960 Pediatrics (918) 696-4065 Sa rae 1 ee en nee HUSAINY, NARGIS H, MD — Provider 1D: 2002484708 Provider ID: '100227070A eeRAL Ks 97001 Hah WLocusr st (620) 624-5066 STILWELL, OK 74960 (@18) 696-4065 Sumner (KS) JENKINS, JEFFREY L, MD Provider ID: 100230050 CALDWELL 1401 WLOGUST ST STE 102 Family Practice STILWELL, OK 74960 No age restrictions (@18) 696-4065 INTEGRIS CALDWELL RHC al Pract Za E CALDWELL, KS 67022 TAYLOR, JIMMIE W, MD (620) 845-2516 Provider i, 1000901808 BLUNK, JIM D, DO STILWELL, OK 74960 WHITE, RITA, ARNP (18) 696-3185 DULOWSKI, WOJCIECH L, MD Internal Medicine 18-99 Years of Age CAMPBELL, BRADLEY G, MD Provider 1D: 2003014508, 1401 W LOCUST ST STE 102 STILWELL, OK 74960 (18) 696-4065 “Language(s other than Engl Spanish ediatrics 0-18 Years of Age BURNS, PATRICIA G, MD Provider ID: 1002532808 1401 W LOCUST ST STE 102 STILWELL, OK 74960 (918) 696-4065 WESTVILLE Family Practice No age restrictions NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA. COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC Provider ID: 2000069601 605 W BUFFINGTON WESTVILLE, OK 74965 (918) 723-3997 WARD, TYE W, DO WEST, FREDRIC A, PA Provider ID: 1000746100 449 S WILLIAMS, WESTVILLE, OK 74965 (918) 723-5456 ‘OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 2011Medical Home Providers by County and Specialty Alfalfa County Medicos por condado y por especialidad GORE, JAMIE L, DO Alfalfa Beaver Provider ID: 2000811108 601 W3RD st CHEROKEE BEAVER ELK CITY, OK 73644 Family Practice Family Practice (620) 228-5800 Noage restrictions Noagereirielons LAFARLETTE, AMANDA L, GREAT SALT PLAINS HEALTH CENTER Provider ID: 2001356804 RO SSHONE CHEROKEE, OK 79728 (620) 900-2800 FERGUSON, KEENAN L, DO FIO SEN, RRISTEN, ARNP INTEGRIS CHEROKEE RHC Provider ID: 1001924206 SES ERAND AVE GhenoKee, On 73728 (6e0) soo-asi6 BENTON, JAMIL. MO, PEMISOWAN Rats, pa Atoka ATOKA Family Practice No age restrictions ABC RURAL HEALTH CLINIC Provider ID: 100747790C 1508 S VIRGINIA ATOKA, OK 74525 (580) 889-3355, FEREDAY, RUTH ELAINE, PA HELTON, RICHARD J, DO FAMILY PRACTICE CLINIC OF ATOKA Provider 1D: 100733090 1510 S VIRGINIA AVE. ATOKA, OK 74525, (680) 889-6621 CLAY, BAMBI A, PA EMERSON, NOEL W, DO WALSTON, DIAN M, PA ‘YARBROUGH, ARDRY L, MD BENNETT, ALLISON B, ARNP Provider 1D: 2001169908, 623 AVE C BEAVER, OK 73932 (680) 625-2273 COMMUNITY CLINIC OF BEAVER Provider ID: 100700760H TAB AVE A BEAVER, OK 73932 (580) 628-3477 MATHEWS, GARY W, MD QSEGEUE-OBASI, FRANCESCA C, Beckham ELK CITY Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age PERKINS, JOHN R, MD Provider 1D: 1002303908 601 W SRD ST ELK CITY, OK 73644 (680) 225-5900 Family Practice No age restrictions BURKS, PATRICIA A, ARNP Provider ID: 1002149408 471 N RANDALL AVE ELK CITY, OK 73644 (680) 243-2273 COFFEY, J CLIFTON, MD Provider iD: 100136650C 1900 W 2ND ST STE C. ELK CITY, OK 73644 (680) 225-9222 ‘Not Acepting Now Pains Provider 1D: 2000815208 41 N RANDALL AVE. ELK CITY, OK 73644 (580) 243-2273, OSU-AJ SCOTT A WILLIAMS DO PC Provider 1D: 2000915608 1900 W 2ND ST STEA ELK CITy, OK 73644 (580) 225-2663 ‘Languages ther than English Spanish WILLIAMS, SCOTT A, DO WHINERY JR, ROYAL B, MD Provider ID: 2002024304 41710 W 3RD ST (680) 225-1290 Podiatrics 0-21 Years of Age PAUL FIRTH MD PC Provider 1D: 1001323908 503 W COUNTRY CLUB BLVD ELk CITY, OK 73644 (680) 226-4466, DIXON, SALENA A, ARNP. HENDERSON, KATHIL, ARNP SAYRE Family Practice No age restrictions GRAHAM, TREVA J, MD Provider ID: 100117500C 1505 WATTS ST SAYRE, OK 73662 (580) 928-2208 KENNEMER, JESSICA L, ARNP Provider ID: 200261780A 911 HOSPITAL DR SAYRE, OK 73662 (680) 938-5541 NOVEMBER 2011 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITYMedical Home Providers by County and Specialty ‘Medicos por condado y por especialidad Beckham County ROBINSON, MICHAEL L,MD WATONGA Family Practice Provider ID; 200253080 Family Practice ‘No.age restrictions ly Pra SAYRE, OK 73662 0-18 Years of Age DECKERWALTERS, (880) 928-9933 SPENCER, ROBERT G, MD Provider ID: 2002941208, ROBISON CLINIC Provider ID: 200007580C 698 WESTSIDE DR Provider ID; 100101570E BOON CLARENCE NASHBLVD STE 108 TAS NWATTS: WATONGA, OK 73772 DURANT, OK 74701 SAYRE, OK 73662 (680) 625-2233, (680) 951-8180 (580) 926-2004 pon Engch Family Practice GASTORF FAMILY CLINIC sya No age restrictions Provider 1D: 2000692908 KENEMER, TAMIL, ARNP MATTHEWS, MARCIAK,MD (COU / STH AVE MAHLER, LISA A, ARNP. Provider ID: 100124760A DURANT, OK 74701 ROBISON, MELVIN L, DO SMITH, EDWINNA B, ARNP_ WHEELER, REBECCA R, PA HYDRO Family Practice No age restrictions OSU-AJ BRENDA STUTZMAN Provider ID: 2000762108 579 N BROADWAY AVE HYDRO, Ok 73048 (405) 669-2291 BINDER, LAUREN K, PA 'STUTZMAN, BRENDA R, DO OKEENE Family Practice No age restrictions OKEENE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CLINIC Provider ID: 1007002500 124N6TH ST OKEENE, OK 73763, (680) 822-4404 ARNOLD, LATRICIA G, DO INGRAM, RUSSELL D, MD LAGAN, HENRY D, MB PARROTT, KEN D/ MD TALLEY, MICHAEL R, MD ‘500 N CLARENCE NASH BLVD WATONGA, OK 73772 (680) 623-2233 WATONGA FAMILY CARE RHC Provider ID: 100732480C. 407 N CLARENCE NASH BLVD WATONGA, OK 73772 (580) 623-4054 ‘Not Accepting New Patients ‘SCHENK, CURTIS A, MD ‘SCHENK, MARY B, ARNP Bryan DURANT Family Practice 21-99 Years of Age BOCTORS CLINIC OF DURANT Provider 1D: 1007339508 {OO BRYAN OR STE 300 DURANT, OK 74701 (680) 924-1760 ROUTH, JOHNETTE L, ARNP ‘THE HEART AND MEDICAL CTR Provider ID: 100746940 1400 BRYAN DR, STE 208 DURANT, OK 74701 (680) 931-0500 ‘Language other than English Hinds KHETPAL, SANGEETA, MD (680) 931-9135 AYCOCK, HEATHER A, ARNP GASTORE, JEFFREY A, DO GASTORF, MELISSA A, DO OSU-AJ DURANT FAMILY MEDICINE Provider ID: 100757080W 1600 UNIVERSITY DURANT, OK 74701 (680) 924-5500 FERGUSON, TIFFANY R, DO LEE, MICHAEL A, DO LEE, TERRY M, DO MARTENS, R GREG, DO_ REYNOLDS, NICHOLAS T, DO OSU-AJ UNIV MED GRP Provider 1D: 200051330E 4610 W UNIVERSITY BLVD DURANT, OK 74701 (680) 924-3400 ‘Language(s other than English ‘Spanish AKIN, JAMIE A, DO DILLOW, DAVID W, DO GORDON, KEVIN J. DO HARRISON, WILLIAM J, DO JESTIS, OLEN L, DO LEE, MICHAEL A, DO LEE, TERRY M, 00. POWERS, CHARLES M, PA ‘SHAFFER, ROBERT R, DO_ ‘SIMULESCU, MICHAEL J, DO SMOTHERS, KRISTY M, ARNP Provider ID: 200060820A 698 WESTSIDE DR. DURANT, OK 74701 (680) 9318180 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 2011Bryan County Medical Home Providers by County and Specialty ‘Medicos por condado y por especialidad Internal Medicine 18-99 Years of Age ‘SHAH, ALIA, MD Provider ID: 2000172108 1400 BRYAN DR. ‘STE 307 DURANT, OK 74701 (680) 920-0105 Pediatrics 0-18 Years of Age CHILDRENS CLINIC OF DURANT Provider ID: 1007417208 4202 N 16TH AVE DURANT, OK 74701 (580) 924-1144 ARABOLU, BALA K, MD VARUGHESE, PAUL J, MD Provider 1D: 200245870A, 1400 BRYAN DR: STE 201 DURANT, OK 74701 (680) 931-2290 Pediatrics 0-21 Years of Age LAUGHLIN, MYNA M, ARNP Provider iD:’ 2001017204 1727 CHUCKWA DR. STE 500 BURANT, OK 74701 (680) 924-5439 Caddo ANADARKO Family Practice No age restrictions BELT, JAY C, DO Provider ID: 1000890308 1104 CENTRAL BLVD ANADARKO, OK 73005 (405) 247-6685 WALKER, RILLA K, PA Provider ID: 200108110A, 1104 E CENTRAL BLVD ANADARKO, OK 73005 (405) 247-6685 WITTEN, JOE A, DO Provider iD: 2001362808, 1104 E CENTRAL BLVD ANADARKO, OK 73005 (405) 247-6685 Internal Medicine 21-99 Years of Age MALDONADO-LOPEZ, JUAN A,MD Provider 1D: 190259800A 404SE 11TH ST ANADARKO, OK 73005 (405) 247-7346 APACHE Family Practice No age restrictions HILL, HELENA M, PA Provider 1D: 100708990C 501 S COBLAKE APACHE, OK 73006 (680) 588-3257 CARNEGIE Family Practice No age restrictions BAILEY, ANGELA D, ARNP Provider ID: 200258350A 13 W MAIN CARNEGIE, OK 73015 (680) 654-2628 KARNIK, ASHUTOSH S, MD Provider iD: 200225760A 101 WASH ST CARNEGIE, OK 73015 (680) 654-4444 OSU-AJ CARNEGIE FAMILY MEDICAL CLINIC Provider 1D: 200091560H 102 N BROADWAY CARNEGIE, OK 73015 (680) 654-2500 HARDEN, TROY L, DO FORT COBB Family Practice No age restrictions VARIETY CARE AT FORT COBB Provider ID: 1007341401 ‘OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERV 307 MAIN ST FORT COBB, OK 73038 (405) 632-6688 BHATTARAL, SANJANA, MD. CHANDRASEKHARAN, NALINA, MD CHITTURI, SHALINI, MD. DANTZLER, NANCY A, ARNP- DEAN, KENDA L, ARN DUBAL, DEEPALI J. MD ‘GODDARD, MICHAEL W; MD HANKINS, JUDITH M, ARNP HOLCOMB, WILLIAM R, DO JOSHI, BHARAT D, MD’ MAYER, PHILIP N, ARNE. MONTEIRO, ANDREW R, MD. RASMUSSEN, KEITH ALEX, PA RICHARDSON, MICHAEL S, PA ROUSH, DWAYNE L, MD ‘STAFFORD, GAIL J, ARNP HINTON Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age HINTON FAMILY MEDICAL CLINIC, LLC Provider ID: 2000733608 1600 N BROADWAY BLVD HINTON, Oi 73047 (405) 642-6131 GARNER, JENNIFER G, PA NOVEMBER 2011 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITYMedical Home Providers by County and Specialty Medicos por condado y por especialidad Canadian County Canadian EL RENO Family Practice No age restrictions MERCY EL RENO Provider ID: 2002625201 2315 PARKVIEW OR EL RENO, OK 73036 (405) 295-2200 DICINTIO, ROBERT C, PA INGRAM, RUSSELL O, MD. RODRIGUEZ, ORSON P, MD REDDEN, CHRISTOPHER B, ARNP Provider ID: 2003078604 1900 COUNTRY CLUB RD EL RENO, OK 73036 (405) 295-2900 VLADIMIR HOLY, MD PC Provider ID: 100020560E 2315 PARKVIEW DR EL RENO, OK 73036 (405) 422/6337 ‘Language(s) other than English Camb Slovak HOLY, VLADIMIR, MD MUSTANG Family Practice O-14 Years of Age INTEGRIS RURAL HEALTH ING Provider ID: 200014470C 1468 N MUSTANG RO MUSTANG, OK 73064 (405) 376-1800 BORREGO ACOSTA, JOSE M, MD BOURNE, MICHELLE L, PA REDDEN, CHRISTOPHER B, ARN SPEEGLE, DAVID, MD MUSTANG FAMILY PHYSCIANS, PC Provider ID: 2001187804, 208 N MUSTANG MALL TER MUSTANG, OK 73064 (408) 256-6000 AMUNDSEN II, GERALD A, MD BROWN, MANDI L, ARNP Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age MUSTANG URGENT CARE Provider ID: 200390840A 115 NMUSTANG RD MUSTANG, OK 73064 (408) 256-8585 BAKER, DUSTIN R, MD KELLY, SHELLY A, ARNP WILCOX, DAVE, PA ‘SAINTS FAMILY HEALTH CENTER MUSTANG Provider ID: 200094240 ‘501 N MUSTANG RD STED MUSTANG, OK 73064 (405) 376-0376 THOMPSON-MATHEW, MIRIAM E, Family Practice ‘No age restrictions BULLOCK, PETER P, MD Provider ID: 2002129608 200 S CASTLE ROCK LN MUSTANG, OK 73064 (405) 256-0374 PIEDMONT Pediatrics 0-18 Years of Age CORMAN Il, MAURICE E, MD Provider ID: 2000933808 63 GOODER SIMPSON BLVD PIEDMONT, OK 73078 (405) 373-0380 YUKON Family Practice 0-20 Years of Age BIORATO, REBECCA G, DO Provider ID: 2000365408 4815 S MUSTANG RD STEH YUKON, OK 73099 (405) 324-5566 Family Practice 0.21 Years of Age YOURCARE YUKON Provider ID: 2003130508 2400 § CORNWELL YUKON, OK 73099 (405) 360-4300 GROVES, PHILICIA, ARNP HA, DAVID, ARNP Family Practice No age restrictions FAMILY HEALTH CARE & MINOR ER Provider 1D: 2000102108 11109 SURREY HILLS BLVD YUKON, OK 73099 (405) 373-2400 “Language ober han English Spaish BROOKS, AMY L, ARNP ‘CALDWELL Il, CONRAD C, MD GIBSON, CENE'L, ARNP JOHNSTON, MICHELLE LEE W, ‘ARNE KALCICH, MICHAEL V, MD KNOX, tM B, ARNP. KRAHAM, GENE STANLEY, PA MEYER, ALICE C, ARNE. MILLER, CHRISTY A, PA PRATT-REID, ANTONIA M, ARNP ‘SMITH, KATHLEEN, ARNP MICHAEL D. FURGESON, MD iC Provider 1D: 200101700A ‘508 W VANDAMENT AVE STE 100 YUKON, OK 73099 (405) 360-8100 ‘Languaget) ober than Eglish Spanish GRAGG, SHELLEY S, PA FURGESON, MICHAEL D, MD HAVENER JR, ROBERT F, PA (OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 2011Medical Home Providers by County and Specialty Canadian County Medicos por condado y por especialidad Pediatrics (OSU-AJ JAMES TURRENTINE 0-14 Years of Age Carter Provider 1D 200058580 INTEGRIS PEDIATRIC bo sk ASSOCIATES OF YUKON ARDMORE MeoMoeeags ot Provider ID: 2000144700 Pract 2 nan Es 1703 PROFESSIONAL CIR Bae ears of ge araseee) eter than Eneich SOKO. OK 73099 CARNAHAN, MICHAEL W, MD —_TURRENTINE, JAMES R, D0 (405) 354-6688 Provider ID: 400431180B OSU-AJ PATZKOWSKY COMBS, KATHLEEN E, MD TOs WALNUT OF 01 DOCTORS CLINIC ERBERAS MELISSA no ARDMORE, OK 73 Prove I: 20008200x Pediatrics HALL, SHARON E, ARNP ARDMORE, OK 73401 0-18 Years of ge Proverb: 2001087208 (680) 223-5432 ALECIA A HANES PC 1104 WALNUT DR. amen) oer an Eaioh Provider ID: 100119070E ‘ARDMORE, OK 73401 S08 VANDAMENT AVE (680) 226-0543 PATZKOWSKY, ROBERT G, DO OSU-AJ FAMILY PRACTICE WILSON LOUGHRIDGE EN soo? ASSOCIATES Provider 1D: 200342240 Provider 1D: 200069200H 41005 15TH AVE NW HANES, ALECIA A, MD 1404 WALNUT DR. ARDMORE, OK 73401 KROPFINGER, REBECCA L, PA ARDMORE, OK 73401 (680) 319-5305 THEISSEN, PAIGE J, PA (80) 226-0543 WILSON, CONNIE M, DO FLORES PEDIATRICS LLC MCCULLOH, THOMAS W, DO Provider 1D: 1007474408 Pediatrics SISEMAINST amily Practice 0-14 Years of Age 0 ae ms CAMACHO GARRIDO, MIGUEL ee Ncctoo BURSON, ANNA C, MD 4, MD soot7as0 range other than English Provider 1D: 1002041908 Provider ID: 100017030 i" 720. GRAND AVE 1404 WALNUT DR FLORES, CATHERINE 8, MD FLORES, JAVIER A, MD FRICKER, TIMOTHY J, MD Provider 1D: 200294670 812 S MUSTANG RD YUKON, OK 73009 (405) 265-3900 LOVELESS, TRINITY M, MD Provider ID: 2001738108 812 S MUSTANG RD YUKON, OK 73099 (405) 265-3900 ARDMORE, OK 73401 (680) 226-9994 HERNANDEZ, GINA E, PA Provider ID: 2000613308 1104 WALNUT DR. ARDMORE, OK 73401 (580) 226-0543 OSU-AJ FORRESTAL FAMILY CLINIC Provider ID: 200069200F 1830 16TH AVE NW ARDMORE, OK 73401 (680) 226-5120 “Language oher than English Spanish FORRESTAL, JAMES E, 00 ARDMORE, OK 73401 (680) 226-0543 Pediatrics 0-18 Years of Age LANDIS, DEREK T, MD Provider 1D: 2001189108 921 14TH AVE NW ARDMORE, OK 73401 (680) 223-5311 Pediatrics 0-20 Years of Age GWEN C. FUENTES MD Provider ID: 1002093306 919 15TH AVE NW ARDMORE, OK 73401 (680) 223-5693, “Langage other than English Spanish Tegal FUENTES, GWEN C, MD NOVEMBER 2011 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITYMedical Home Providers by County and Specialty Medicos por condado y por especialidad Carter County HEALDTON Family Practice No age restrictions MERCY PHYSICIANS HEALDTON Provider ID:_200226190C 3472 HOSPITAL RD HEALDTON, OK 73438 (680) 229-0678 FAVORITE, GREGORY R, PA HABJ-BIK, YNAL, MD NEWEY, MARK W, DO Provider ID: 100095690 12N4TH ST HEALDTON, OK 73438 (680) 229-2334 Cherokee HULBERT Family Practice ‘No age restrictions NORTHEASTERN OK COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC Provider ID: 200006960A 311 W MAIN HULBERT, OK 74441 (918) 772-3390 CHASTEEN, JEFFREY E, D0 GIBSON, KENNETH W, BO. PARKHILL Family Practice No age restrictions COOKSON, BRIAN E, ARNP Provider ID:' 2001172404 26251 HIGHWAY 82 STE 1 PARKHILL, OK 74451 (918) 207-0667 POTEAU Family Practice ‘No age restrictions GARVIN, JANET L, DO Provider iD: 100203010F 104 WALL ST POTEAU, OK 74953 (618) 867-2116 TAHLEQUAH Family Practice 18-99 Years of Age TURNER, DONN R, DO Provider ID: 100256380A 1607-E S MUSKOGEE. TAHLEQUAH, OK 74464 (918) 456-0001 Family Practice 21-99 Years of Age SUMNER, LARRY D, MD Provider ID: 1001243408 +1500 E DOWNING ST STE 205 TAHLEQUAH, OK 74464 (918) 456-0592 Family Practice No age resiricions EDWARDS, COY J, MD Provider ID:' 1002532904 1500 E DOWNING ST STE 205, TAHLEQUAH, OK 74464 (918) 456-0592 NORTHEASTERN OKLA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS, INC Provider ID: 200006960E 1500 E DOWNING ST STE 214 TAHLEQUAH, OK 74464 (918) 772-3380 WARD, TYE W, DO REBTOY, LESLIE, DO Provider 1D: 1002220100 1203 E ROSS BYPASS, TAHLEQUAH, OK 74464 (918) 207-0991 Pediatrics 0-20 Years of Age AHMAD, YAHYA M, MD_ Provider 1D: 2000195904 709 E DOWNING ST ‘TAHLEQUAH, OK 74464 (918) 458-9444 Pediatrics 0-21 Years of Age ‘TAHLEQUAH PEDIATRICS Luc Provider 1D: 2000577608, 1310 E BOONE ST. TAHLEQUAH, OK 74464 (918) 456-7700 “Language(s oher than Bgl Spars AHDUNKO, KRISTIN M, PA SIDDIQUE, NAVEED, MD Choctaw HUGO Family Practice No age restrictions HUGO MEDICAL CLINIC RHC Provider ID: 1007308206 1201 E JACKSON HUGO, OK 74743 (680) 326-6423, BOLES, TONYA J, PA FLATT, 'G WAYNE, DO LAVOY, TIMOTHY'A, PA LEINAU, ROBERT A, PA MCLEMORE, ALBERT E, PA MURTY, GANNAVARAPU V, MD ‘OLDHAM, ROBERT A, PA PARDUE, VICTORIA E, 00 WALSTON, DIAN M, PA. PABILONA, JOSE L, MD Provider 1D: 1000269008 1405 E KIRK ST STEA HUGO, OK 74743 (580) 326-8317 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY ‘NOVEMBER 2011Cimarron County Medical Home Providers by County and Specialty ‘Medicos por condado y por especialidad Cimarron BOISE CITY Family Practice No age restrictions CIMARRON MEMORIAL RURAL HLT CLN Provider ID: 100700740E 102 S ELLIS BOISE CITY, OK 73833 (680) 544-3008 ‘Languages other han Engh Spon CARLTON, BRUCE S, PA WHEELER JR, JASPER L, MD WHEELER, PAULE, MD Cleveland MOORE Family Practice 0-14 Years of Age EARLEY, KRISTIN F, DO Provider iD: 200087750A 820 S TELEPHONE RD STE 110 MOORE, OK 73160 (405) 793-9365 EARLEY, MITCHELL L, DO Provider iD: 100850580A 520 S TELEPHONE RD STE 110 MOORE, OK 73160 (405) 912-3400 HINZ, WESLEY D, MD Provider ID: 1001065400 700 S TELEPHONE RD MOORE, OK 73160 (405) 912-3120 HSIEH, MISTY, MD Provider ID: 1001384804 700 S TELEPHONE RD MOORE, OK 73160 (405) 912-3120 Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age ‘SHEPHERD, JAYNA N, DO Provider ID: 2000453008 400 N EASTERN AVE. MOORE, OK 73160 (405) 793-1188 ‘SOUTH MOORE MEDICIAL CLINIC PC Provider ID: 200095750A 44800 S WESTERN AVE MOORE, OK 73170 (405) 912-4900 LAYNE, KEITH R, DO Family Practice 18-99 Years of Age COOK, AUDRA K, MD Provider ID: 200007470A 700 S TELEPHONE RD MOORE, OK 73160 (405) 912-3120 Family Practice No age restrictions ALLIED PHYSICIANS GROUP INC, PC Provider ID: 200031250E 49316 S WESTERN AVE STEM MOORE, OK_73170 (405) 495-5184 “Languages the than English Spanish AVERY, ROBIN N, ARNP ELLIOTT, BOBBY L, DO HEBENSPERGER, ASHLEY J, ARNP KEAR, MELISSA R, ARNP KENDRICK, MARY'S, DO MAYER, PHILIP N, ARNP. ROSS, CHERYL A, ARNP ROY, RENEE, MD WASHINGTON, KENNETH D, PA. FANNING, JANET L, MD Provider ID: 1001950308 400 N EASTERN AVE MOORE, OK 73160 (405) 793-0502 FANNING, KYLE W, MD Provider ID: 1001977708 400 N EASTERN AVE MOORE, OK 73160 (405) 798-4096 LIGHTHOUSE HEALTHCARE Cc Provider 1D: 2002578008 507 NE 12TH ST. MOORE, OK 73160 (405) 703-4202 “Languages ther than English ‘Spanish GUTHRIE JR, DONALD A, PA ‘TUTT, DONALD L, MD. VOGEL, THOMAS E, MD MOORE PRIMARY CARE, INC Provider 1D: 200079670A 4400 SE 4TH STEH MOORE, OK 73160 (405) 798-7400 CAMP, TOMMY D, PA GARTER, RANDALL A, PA. CLAUSEN, JOHN MARK, PA. GOFORTH, SHEILA R, PA LOVELACE, LARRY T, DO RHODES, MANDI 8, PA Internal Medicine 18-99 Years of Age JOHNSON, JOHNNY O, DO Provider 1D: 200205340A 700 S TELEPHONE RD STE 100 MOORE, OK 73160 (405) 912-3140 Pediatrics 12-20 Years of Age SNYDER, DIANE M, MD Provider ID: 1000912706 400 N EASTERN AVE. MOORE, OK 73160 (405) 793-1188 0 NOVEMBER 2011 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITYMedical Home Providers by County and Specialty Medicos por condado y por especialidad Cleveland County NOBLE Family Practice rat Pract 18-99 Years of Age O21 Years of Age VIERA, VIVIAN, MD Provider ID: 1002209800 OSU-AJ MERCY CLINIC S00N PORTER AVE NOBLE STE 105 Provider 1D: 200283440F NORMAN, OK 73071 501 E MAGUIRE (40s) 310-3422 STE 4000 Tanga tar ton English NOBLE, OK 73068 on (405) 872-9008 Family Practice DAVIS, MARC 1 D0 , Nonge restrictions NANG THOMAS SO ‘AFFORDABLE QUALITY Gia RMSE 3 ARNP HEALTHCARE, LLC MEYER, CHRISTOPHER M, MD Provider 1D; 200031670C Family Practice ‘STE 200 em ee cas NORMAN, OK 73072 ‘No age restrict (405) 217-9987 NOBLE FAMILYHEALTHCARE “Lament eter han Engh CLINIC Spon Provider 1D: 2000760108 ALPERT, SHERRY 8, ARNP 205 S MAIN ST BRIGGS, JAN B, ARNP. NOBLE, OK 73068 BOBSGH YOUN, ARNE (405) 872-5403 JUMP, LESLIE M, ARNP FARIS, KEVIN J, MO HIMBELL FARRIS, REBECCA E, PENDARVIS, BRIAN T, ARNP ARNE NORMAN MEYER, DEANNA J, ARNP Pediatrics Family Practice 0°14 Years of Age O14 Years of Ase STACY, TADGY D, MD FAMILY MEDICINE Provider ID: 100114360 ASSOCIATES OF NORMAN 808 WALL ST Provider ID: 2000472008 NORMAN, OK, 73068 TSTATAMEDA ST (405) 321-5116 MAN, OK ; (405) 321-4511 Pcie ee Age \YCOGK, HEATHER A, ARNP SUCOSE teste o Ate DRS EM FOX AND JE FIELDS TAYLOR, CYNTHIA, MO Provider ID: 1007483406 Family Practice 00.6 ROBINSON O18 Years of Age Hoe ox 70 HABIB, MUHAMMAD A, MD en Provider: 2001232000 neg othe han Et Foo 24TH AVE NW. 7 NORMAN, OK 73069 ELLIS, BRIAN, MO (40s) 975420 FIELES, JAMES &, MD FOX, EILEEN M, MD JACKSON, DONNA S, MD Provider ID: _100067530C 808 WALL ST NORMAN, OK 73069 (405) 321-5114 MILLIGAN, MICHAEL J, DO Provider 1D: 1001081306 808 WALL ST NORMAN, OK 73069 (405) 321-5114 WILSON MEDICAL CLINIC Provider ID:_100189500D 700 WALL ST NORMAN, OK 73069 (405) 360-7337 TLenguages) ether than English French Spanish BRIGGS, JAN, ARNP CASSIDY, KATHALEEN D, PA WILSON, VICTOR, MD Pediatrics No age restrictions KUHLS, THOMAS L, MD Provider ID: 100821770C ‘808 WALL ST. NORMAN, OK 73069 (405) 321-5114 Coal COALGATE Family Practice No age restrictions FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA, INC Provider ID: 200322700 4107 E POST AVE. COALGATE, OK 74538 (680) 927-2829 ‘Languages ther than English Spanish CROSS, GLENDA G, ARNP FICHTENBERG, HANS, DO HENDRIX, MICHAEL DDO LEE, ERIC 8, DO MCELHANY, UNA L, ARNP PLUMMER, KEITH G, PA REEL, PAUL A, DO 'STANBERRY, TOMMIE G, PA OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 2011 "Coal County Medical Home Providers by County and Specialty ‘Medicos por condado y por especialidad RJ HELTON RURAL HEALTH CLINIC Provider ID: 1007411308 108 W OHIO AVE COALGATE, OK 74538 (680) 927-2534 FEREDAY, RUTH ELAINE, PA HELTON, RICHARD 3, 00 SIMPSON, LEE H, PA’ Comanche LAWTON Family Practice 0-14 Years of Age AIKU, IDORENYIN L, MD Provider ID: 2002250008 93201 W GORE BLVD. STE 301 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 248-8226 ARYAN P KADIVAR MD PC Provider ID: 2000959504 916. SW 38TH ST STED LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 248-2220 KADIVAR, ARYAN P, MD ATKINSON, THOMAS B, MD Provider ID: 1001698904 4411 W GORE BLVD. ‘STE B1-B2 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 248-8000 CABALLERO Ill, RENATO M, MD Provider 1D: 2002118204 3201 W GORE BLVD ‘STE 304 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 248-8225 CABALLERO, RENATO M, MD Provider ID: 1001385608 3201 W GORE BLVD STE 301 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 2488225 JONES, ROBERT E, MD Provider 1D: 1002539406 3201 W GORE BLVD STE 202 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 248-7872 Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age DAVE, MAYANK, MD Provider ID: 2002113008, 5606 SW LEE BLVD STE 202, LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 536-5300 “Language other than English Hing ISMAIL, SHERIF S, MD Provider ID: 100018480E 3201 W GORE BLVD STE 105 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 510-7077 ‘SHEA, ELENA S, MD Provider ID: 2001627008, 5112 W GORE BLVD STE 1 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 699-3900 Family Practice No age restrictions CHISHOLM Ill, ROBERT M, MD Provider ID: 1001085008 605 W GORE BLVD STES LAWTON, OK 73501 (680) 353-1616 COTTON, MARK W, DO Provider ID: 1001015808 5610 SW LEE BLVD LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 536-6600 DUTOIT, FRANCOIS J, MD Provider ID: 1002265508 4411 W GORE BLVD STE B6 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 699-7500 GORDON, KRISTA J, MD Provider 1D: 1002534806 5366 NW CACHE RD STES LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 536-7546 "Not Acepting New Patonts LAWTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER Provider ID: 100700750Z 3811 W GORE BLVD STES LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 355-5242 GIANG, MY K, D0. KRIEG, LAUREN N, ARNP MORTON Ill, GREGORY K, MD Provider ID: 1000083606 412 SW SUMMIT AVE. LAWTON, OK 73501 (680) 355-9101 ‘OU SOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA. FAMILY PRACTICE Provider 1D: 2000214908 1202 NW ARLINGTON AVE LAWTON, OK 73507 (680) 248-4797 Taraueget) other than English Spanish CARROLL, BELLA S, MO GRISWELL, DAN F, MD HOOVER, PENNY L, MD MALLING, HEIDIL, MD MATTSON, RODGER C, 00 WILLS, CORINNE R, ARNP PASZKOWIAK, JAROSLAW K, iD Provider ID: 2000824808 4411 W GORE BLVD STE B1-B2 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 248-8000 RAMOS, MICHAEL, MD Provider ID: 100205240 3811 W GORE BLVD. STE 4 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 585-5560 2 NOVEMBER 2011 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY.Medical Home Providers by County and Specialty Medicos por condado y por especialidad ‘Comanche County REZAEI, ABOLGHASEM M, MD Pediatrics Provider ID: 2000970208 4845 W GORE BLVD STE4 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 248-2300 Internal Medicine 21-99 Years of Age LAWTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER Provider ID: 100700750Z 9811 W GORE BLVD. STE LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 356-5242 MITHLO, MARIA M, MD Pediatrics (0-18 Years of Age LAWTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER Provider 1D: 1007007502 3811 W GORE BLVD STE6 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 355-5242 KALYANAM, NALIN MD Internal Medicine 18-99 Years of Age BRITTINGHAM, RICHARD t iD Provider 1D: 1000319408 3201 W GORE BLVD STE 304 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 353-6760 COLEMAN, LAURA E, MD Provider 1D: 200212910 3201 W GORE BLVD STE Gt LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 510-7076 <1 Year of Age ‘SOLITARIO, EDNA C, MD Provider 1D: 100054830 3201 W GORE BLVD. STE 100 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 363-8942 "Not Accepting New Palas Pediatrics 0-18 Years of Age LUZ, VINCENT, MD Provider ID: 2002652308, 9608 SW LEE BLVD STE 201 LAWTON, OK 73505 (680) 689-3000 Cotton WALTERS Family Practice No.age restrictions GOSS, LARRY G, MD Provider 1D: 1001342000 402 N BROADWAY. WALTERS, OK 73572 (680) 875-3320 Craig VINITA Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age WARREN CLINIC-VINITA. Provider 1D: 1007394900 715 N FOREMAN ST VINITA, OK 74301 (405) 256-8731 COOPER, MARTIN T, MD DIAZ, MARCIA L, ARN. HORTON, TERRY R, MD Family Practic 0-45 Years of Age RUSSELL KOHL MD PLLC Provider ID: 200097950A 803 N FOREMAN ST STE 101 VINITA, OK 74301 (918) 256-2267 KOHL, RUSSELL W, MD Family Practice No age restrictions FRANCISCO, GINA M, ARNP Provider ID: 200122900 803 N FOREMAN ST. STE 102 VINITA, OK 74301 (918) 256-2261 GRAND LAKE MEDICAL PARK Provider 1D: 1002614001. 936488 S HIGHWAY 82 VINITA, OK 74304 (918) 782-1881 JENNINGS Il, CHARLES R, PA LITTLEFIELD, MARY E, ARNP MEREDITH, MARGARET E, PA PHILLIPS, CURTIS A, DO Provider ID: 1002283706 428 S WILSON ST VINITA, OK 74301 (918) 256-5021 WELCH Family Practice No age restrictions EVANS, BILLY R, PA Provider ID: 1000198208 343 5 COMMERCIAL ST WELCH, OK 74369 (918) 542-6644 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 2011 8Medical Home Providers by County and Sp Salty Creek County ‘Medicos por condado y por especialidad OSU-AJ DRUMRIGHT Family Practice Creek MEDICAL CLINIC 0-18 Years of Age Provider 1D: 200119080A BRISTOW 612 W BYPASS FS OANA DD Family Practice DRUMRIGHT, OK 74030 615.4 § MISSION ST 0-18 Years of Age coe ater ak DOUGLAS W SAPULPA, OK 74006 BRANT JR, DOUGLAS W, DO ni ‘AHS OKLA - SARAH B . PINSON, PA MANNFORD Family Practice Provider ID: 200100700P ily Practi ears of Age 2OOW 7TH ST Aarna rataton ‘ADAMS, ANDREA M, DO srt No age restrictions Provider ID: 2000971808 BRISTOW, OK 74010 OSU-AJRMICHAELEIMENDO 550 121ST ST (918) 361 Provider ID: 200076210M SAPULPA, OK 74066 PINSON, SARAH B, PA SOO CIMARRON DF. (@1e) 291-5200 ans, OKLA JASON (918) 865-5000 ° cam Practice 99 Years of Age 2 EIMEN, R MICHAEL, DO Provider ID: 200044160W SOHNSON, RUTH K, PA RUSSELL, JAMES, MD Provider ID: 1001344508 STE 104 OILTON BRISTOW, OK 74010 3085 MAIN (018) 367-8818 Family Practice SAPULPA, OK 74066 (gta) 224-3081 REMINGTON, JASON D, D0 No age restrictions rosy Prat ' JOHNSON, DAWNA H, ARNP Family Practice feng rns Eroeetae Tansso4oon “ADVANCED THERAPEUTIC AHS OKLA CARL SMITH OILTON, OK 74052 SOLUTIONS LLC Provider 1D: 200100700 (18) 862-3700 Provider 1D: 200334560 Be ay redeties Roe seNer Ne (918) 367-4909 0-18 Years of Age a A 9 “9 740 SCHAFER, RICHARD W,DO -—- HOWARD, BRONWYNL, ARNP_—_FIEGEL, DEBORAH S, ARNP cov Provider 1D: 200121770 . Ertan, tooest4t0D 509 SA AVE BURLESON, STEPHANIE, DO BRISTOW, OK 74010 GILTON, OK 74052 Provider 1D: 200118150 (18) 367-1444 (@18) 862-4671 550.W 12187 ST SAPULPA, OK 74033, DRUMRIGHT SAPULPA (G18) 298-2264 i Family Practice RICHARDSON, SHERRI L, Sarna resmictions O14 Years of Age ARNP Provider 1D: 2002336908 LITTLETREEMEDICALCLINIC AHS OKLA - JAMES E Poe Ae Luc BURLESON i, DO ShpuLPA, OR 74056 Provider ID: 2002152104 Provider 1D: 200100700R (918) 216-4006 900 W TRUCK BYPASS 580, W 121ST ST - BRUMRIGHT: OK 74030 SAPULPA, OK 74033 Internal Medicine (@t8) 352-9001 (18) 291-5200 18-99 Years of Age KRUG, DAVID S, DO BURLESON Il, JAMES E, DO KRISHNAMURTHI, S, MD Provider ID: 1002485104 114 S MISSION SAPULPA, OK 74066 (@18) 227-3914 4 NOVEMBER 2011 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITYMedical Home Providers by County and Specialty Medicos por condade y por especialidad Custer County Custer CLINTON Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age RH SPECIALTY GROUP Provider ID: 2000737408 90.N 30TH ST STE? CLINTON, OK_73601 (680) 323-0736 ‘TORDZRO, WILLIAM K, MD KOLKER, CHRISTOPHER T, wD Provider ID: 100102890B B16A FRISCO AVE CLINTON, OK 73601 (680) 323-4644 MANN, MARK B, MD Provider ID: 100107150D ‘90N 30TH ST STE4 CLINTON, OK 73601 (580) 323-0232 “Langge(s) other than English Spach OSU-AJ STACEY KNAPP Provider ID: 200119080P 209 S 30TH ST, CLINTON, OK 73601 (680) 323-7800 “Language(s other than English Spanish KNAPP, STACEY D, DO. LANGLEY, TRACY L, ARNP Family Practice 0-21 Years of Age FEY, VICTOR L, MD Provider ID: 1001070208 90 N 30TH ST STEt CLINTON, OK 73601 (680) 323°5433, Family Practice 14-99 Years of Age BAKER, KRISTY R, ARNP Provider ID: 2000832408 3140 W HAYES, CLINTON, OK 73601 (680) 323-1937 Family Practice ‘No age restrictions ROBERT VAN BLAKEBURN MD PC Provider ID: 100110960C 800 FRISCO AVE CLINTON, OK 73601 (680) 323-2700 HARTSELL, TAMARA J, ARNP WALKER, LINDSIR, ARNP Provider 1D: 200350760A 3140 W HAYES CLINTON, OK 73601 (680) 323-1937 Pediatrics 0-21 Years of Age PAUL FIRTH MD PC Provider 1D: 100132390D 500 N 6TH ST CLINTON, OK_ 73601 (680) 225-4466 DIXON, SALENA A, ARNP HENDERSON, KATHIL, ARNP- WEATHERFORD Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age HUSER II, JOHN M, MD Provider ID: 100252270A 3725 LEGACY WEATHERFORD, OK 73096 (680) 772-3331 Family Practice 0-20 Years of Age AARON, MICHAEL E, MD Provider ID: 1000888208 3743 LEGACY, WEATHERFORD, OK 73096 (680) 772-0223 Family Practice No age restrictions BLUTH, BRIAN L, MD Provider ID; 2002468008 211 NILLINOIS, WEATHERFORD, OK 73096 (680) 772-2344 “Language(s other han English Spanish LONG, JONATHON R, MD Provider ID: 200173720A 3735 LEGACY WEATHERFORD, OK 73096 (680) 772-5600 MALLETT MOORE, TAMALAR, Provider ID: 200224110A 3739 LEGACY WEATHERFORD, OK 73096 (680) 772-2400 “Languages ther then English Spanish Delaware GROVE Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age GRAND LAKE AREA CLINICS Provider ID: 100747570A 900 E 13TH ST STE 101 GROVE, OK 74344 (918) 786-9800 DAVID, MICHAEL D, DO FLETCHER, JANET M, PA GELINAS, JOSEPH J, ‘ARNP HAMILTON, THOMAS 5, DO HERBST, AUNNA C, 0. RUTTER, JAMES D, MD Family Practice No age rest BECHTOL, ZACHARY T, MD Provider ID: 1002535108 601 13TH ST (918) 786-4664 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 2011 16Delaware County Medical Home Providers by County and Specialty ‘Medicos por condado y por especialidad HENDRIX, DEBORAH L, ARNP Provider ID: 200005710A 19E 3RD ST GROVE, OK 74344 (918) 786-9587 “Langue() other than English Spanish ‘OSU-AJ GRAND LAKE FAMILY MEDICINE Provider ID: 100749410Y 1101 E 13TH ST. GROVE, OK 74344 (918) 786-7878 ‘Languages ther han English Spanish. DAVID, MICHAEL D, DO HERBST, AUNNA C, DO RUSSELL, RENEE J, MD Provider ID: 1000172900 1110 NEO LOOP GROVE, OK 74344 (818) 786-3100 JAY Family Practice No age restrictions JAY FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC Provider 1D: 2001346108 2485 N'MAIN ST JAY, OK 74346 {@18) 253-2560 MEASE MEDICAL CLINIC Provider ID: 100744000 659 14TH ST BLOGB JAY, OK 74346 (918) 253-6418 MEASE, DARRELL R, MD KANSAS Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age HUFFMAN, CARLEEN D, ARNP Provider 1D: 2000367208 1261 E TULSA AVE KANSAS, OK 74347 (918) 868.2175 PUMMILL, DANIEL A, MD Family Practice Provider I: 1002279708 Noage restrictions Be, cauer eam cane (918) 868-2175 SERVICES Provider {D: 2000513306 SIS OWEN K GARRIOTT RO amet ia 2021 SEILING JANZEN, DWAYNE L, DO Family Practice WING, ARLYN 6, PA No age restrictions OSU-AJ INTEGRIS NW FAMILY HESTER, JOHN W, DO Provider iD: 1001358308 HIGHWAY 60 NE SEILING, OK 73663 (580) 923-7361 MEDICINE CLINIC Provider 1D: 2002942008, 620 S MADISON ST STE 209 ENID, OK 73701 (680)'548-1544 Garfield JANZEN, DWAYNE L, DO JONES, JEFFREY R, DO ENID Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age VAVERKA, LORA M, ARNP Provider ID: 1001141404. 825 E OWEN K GARRIOTT RD ENID, OK 73702 (405) 863-2905 “Language(s oher than English Spanish Family Practice 18-99 Years of Age INTEGRIS FAMILY FIRST Provider ID: 200219500E. 915 E OWEN K GARRIOTT RD STEK ENID, OK 73701 (©80)'242-4300 BENTON, JAMIL, MD. HOLLAND, DAVID, ARNP MATIAS, DAISY A, ND OU ENID FAMILY MED Provider !D: 1007082008 620 S MADISON ST STE 304 ENID, Ok 73701 (680) 242-1300 “Language(s ater than English Spanish BRAUD, KRISTA BAINE, PA PONTIOUS, JAMES M, MD SHORT, MARGO R, MD THOMPSON, JANNA K, PA Pediatrics 0-14 Years of Age OSU-AJ NORTHWEST PEDIATRICS Provider ID: 200283440 3201 N VAN BUREN STE 303 ENID, OK 73703 (680) 234-7070 Q'QUIN, MICHAEL J, MD ‘SIMON, WILLIAM H,'MD ‘SWITZER, EVE H, MD 6 NOVEMBER 2011 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITYMedical Home Providers by County and Specialty Medicos por condado y por especialidad Garfield County Pediatrics MAYSVILLE IE ae MAYSVILLE MALHOTRA, SUMAN, MD Ronny ometons mee se 620 S MADISON ST MAYSVILLE RURAL HEALTH ‘STE 204 CENTER froin se rn GARBER (405) 867-4404 rani Pt or ox a Paste, BESAIRRAPD 0 “oarocrramiy cue Sate SS Provider 0: 1006005002 ZZURLINE, WILLIAM J, PA GARBER, OK 73738 PAULS VALLEY (680) 863-2204 Family Practice HUGABOOM, ELDON L, PA No age restrictions CAMPBELL, LOUIE K, PA on SEALE oc mas LINDSAY (405) 238-5501 fe son ane sent at, HICKS, TAMMY, DO ROBERT MWESTCOTT MD PC provider ID: 100097310A 409 S MAIN ST PAULS VALLEY, OK 73075 HESNOISE 02 awa HBS ae Aas es queens Sire WESTCOTT, ROBERT M, MD HOFFMAN, LISA C, MD gourd CENTRAL MEDICAL & Provider (0; Z0cte2teoe RE URC! NTER ure BRERA ox rors prema oven (etsy soetiege eM nose (405) 786-1414 STRATFORD ARRASMITH, ROCKY A, PA Family Practice scamerscancnes Somat, MILBURN, JANENA G, FNP KUBIER, MARTIN J, PA eerie noes 217 W SMITH ees WYNNEWOOD Family Practice No age restrictions ROE, CYNTHIA J, ARNP Provider ID: 100131280B 4202 E ROBERT S KERR BLVD WYNNEWOOD, OK 73098 (405) 665-2424 Grady CHICKASHA Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age BLACK-WICKS, LAURA M, DO Provider 1D: 2000227000 2100 W IOWA AVE CHICKASHA, OK 73018 (405) 224-2100 COPPEDGE, MITCHELL D, MD Provider 1D: 1001557008 2222 W IOWA AVE CHICKASHA, OK 73018 (405) 224-8111 FAUBION, SHELLY D, DO Provider ID: 1001253308 2100 W IOWA AVE CHICKASHA, OK 73018 (405) 224-2100 KADECHUK, LAURA L, PA Provider ID: 2003171604 2100 W IOWA AVE CHICKASHA, OK 73018 (405) 224-2160 Family Practice 0-21 Years of Age WALLACE, KACEY L, DO Provider ID: 200077860 2100 W IOWA AVE CHICKASHA, OK 73018 (405) 224-2100 (OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 2011 ”Grady County Medical Home roviders by County and Specialty Medicos por condado y por especialidad Family Practice 21-99 Years of Age MALUF, KAREN S, MD Provider ID: 100147280A 2222. IOWA AVE CHICKASHA, OK 73018 (405) 224-8111 Family Practice No age restrictions ‘THOMPSON, IAN S, MD Provider ID: 1002567006 2222 W IOWA AVE CHICKASHA, OK 73018 (405) 224-8111 Pediatrics 0-18 Years of Age BAIRD, TIFFANY R, MD Provider ID: 2001874308 2100 W IOWA AVE CHICKASHA, OK 73018 (405) 224-2160 GONZALEZ, XAVIER L, MD Provider ID: ‘2000231408, 2100 W IOWA AVE, CHICKASHA, OK 73018 (405) 224-2100 Pediatrics 0-20 Years of Age FREED, JAMES E, MD Provider ID: 1001166408 2222 W IOWA AVE CHICKASHA, OK 73018 (405) 224-8141 MUNCY, DEVON J, PA Provider ID: 200075810A 2222 W IOWA AVE, CHICKASHA, OK 73018 (405) 224-8141 RUSH SPRINGS Family Practice No age restrictions SECOY, RONALD W, PA Provider ID: 1000536608 113. S RUSH AVE RUSH SPRINGS, OK 73082 (680) 476.2527 TUTTLE Family Practice Noage: DEACONESS FAMILY CARE TUTTLE Provider ID: 2000583200 4805 E HIGHWAY 37 TUTTLE, OK 73089 (405) 381-9979 BALL, AUDRAS, PA BROWN, CYNTHIA K, PA EVERETT, MELISSA M, PA HOLDER, DEBORAH DEE, PA LEU-HENTHORN, ANDREA K, PA ROSS, DEAN L, MD. ‘SHANDY, TONJA S, PA ‘SPARKS, RHONDA’A, MD UTLEY, JULIE, PA’ KELLY, SHELLY A, ARNP Provider ID: 200314980A 5100 E HIGHWAY 37 TUTTLE, OK 73089 (405) 381-5111 LAFFOON, CARL L, ARNP Provider 1D: 200002980 5100 E HIGHWAY 37 TUTTLE, OK 73089 Greer GRANITE Family Practice No age restrictions EVANS, MARK A, PA Provider ID: 1000546908, 417 N MAIN GRANITE, OK 73547 (680) 535-4598 MANGUM Family Practice No age restrictions BLACKHAWK MANGUM LLC Provider ID: 100699750E 118 LOUIS TITTLE AVE MANGUM, OK 73554 (680) 782-3353, LESTER, JEFFRY S, MO MOSS, BRIDGET A, ARNP CALEY JR, DAVID L, MD Provider 1D: 100063340F 144 S LOUIS TITTLE AVE MANGUM, OK 73554 (405) 364-8111 MANU OK LESTER, JEFFRY S, MD Grant Provider iD: 100255150K 4 WICKERSHAM ST MEDFORD MANGUM, OK 73554 i" (580) 782-3353 Family Practce MOSS, BRIDGET A, ARNP No age restrictions Provider ID: 200124810 INTEGRIS MEDFORD RHC 4 WICKERSHAM ST Provider 1D: 1007557908, MANGUM, OK 73554 458 8 SUNSET DR (680) 782-3353 MEDFORD, OK 73759 (680) 395-3219 BLUNK, JIM_D, DO Harmon ESTRADA, CHRISTIE J, PA HiUGABOOM ELDON L, PA HOLLIS WHITE: RITA'S, ARNE HE UES TIMSME, aRNP Family Practice No age restrictions ABRAHAM, AKRAM R, MD Provider ID: 100034510E 920 N 8TH ST HOLLIS, OK 73550 (680) 688-2200 8 NOVEMBER 2011 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITYMedical Home Providers by County and Specialty Medicos por condado y por especialidad Harmon County HALLABA, MOHEB A, MD Provider ID: 1002002108 400 E SYCAMORE ST HOLLIS, OK 73550 (580) 688-2800 ‘Languages ther han English ‘ante French Spanish WATSON, JACEQULINE R, RNP Provider ID: 200355380A 920 N8TH ST. HOLLIS, OK 73550 (680) 688-2200 Harper BUFFALO Family Practice No age restrictions DALEY, ROBERTA L, PA Provider ID: 1002022508 610 NHOY STEB BUFFALO, OK 73834 (680) 735-2911 SNYDER, JEQUITA D, DO Provider 1D: 200133230 610.N HOY STEB BUFFALO, OK 73834 (680) 735-2911 LAVERNE Family Practice No age restrictions LAVERNE FAMILY HEALTH CLINIC Provider ID: 1006996606 4100 § OKLAHOMA DR LAVERNE, OK 73848 (680) 921-3355 ‘Languages other than English Spanish (MADRID, STEVE M, PA ‘SUTHERS, NEAL K, MD Haskell STIGLER Family Practice No age restrictions ‘OSU-AJ WOODSON FAMILY CLINIC Provider ID: 100089460C 907 NW STH ST STIGLER, OK 74462 (o18) 967-3355 WOODSON, STEPHEN W, DO STIGLER HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER Provider 1D: 2000545008 1505 E MAIN ST. STIGLER, OK 74462 (18) 967-3368 Hughes HOLDENVILLE. Family Practice No age restrictions GIBSON, MICHAEL J, PA Provider iD: 100848080 400 MCDOUGAL DR HOLDENVILLE, OK 74848 (405) 379-4202 HOLDENVILLE GENERAL HOSPITAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC. Provider ID: 1006998806 100 MCDOUGAL DR HOLDENVILLE, OK 74848 (405) 379-4201 HARPER, GERALD N, ARNP WETUMKA General Practice No age restrictions EAST CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FAMILY HEALTH CENTER Provider 1D: 2002354504, 401 S WASHITA ST WETUMKA, OK 74863 (405) 452-5400 “Language(s oher than English Spanish EDWARDS, STEFFANEE R, ARNP COVELL, ROBERT, DO Jackson ALTUS Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age HOKETT, JAMIE LYN, MD. Provider iD: 2000074508 201 S PARK LN. ALTUS, OK 73521 (680) 480-3335 Family Practice 1-99 Years of Age TRAN, JOHN D, DO Provider ID: 1001142408 201 S PARK LN ALTUS, OK 73521 (680) 480-3350, Family Practice No age restrictions ANDREWS, ANGELIA G, MD Provider ID:' 100113760D 205 S PARK LN. ALTUS, OK 73521 (680) 379-6650 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 2011 0Jackson County Medical Home Providers by County and Specialty Medicos por condado y por especialidad CHARLES C CARTER MD PLLC Provider ID: 2001133008 4018 € BROADWAY ST STE 102 ALTUS, OK 73521 (680) 480-1600 “Language(s other than English Spas CARTER, CHARLES C, MD DAWOD, ABDALLAH S, MD Provider iD: 200053860A 205 S PARK LN. ‘ALTUS, OK 73521 (680) 477-4522 MURRAY, KATHLEEN F, DO Provider ID: 200250710A 205 S PARK LN ALTUS, OK 73521 (680) 379-6650 “Lemguage(s) other than English Spanish POWERS, MELINDA S, DO Provider ID: 2000403206 205 S PARK LN. ALTUS, OK 73521 (680) 480-3320 ROOT, JOHN C, MD Provider ID: 100126830 205 S PARK LN. ALTUS, OK 73521 (680) 477-4522 SHEETS, RANDALL E, MD Provider iD: 1001589008 201 S PARK LN ALTUS, OK 73521 (680) 481-1104 Internal Medicine 18-99 Years of Age PEREZ, WILLARD O, MD Provider 1D: 2000701308 201 S PARK LN ALTUS, OK 73524 (680) 480-3310 Pediatrics 0-18 Years of Age CUNNINGHAM, KANDI F, ARNP Provider ID: 100126470C 1200 E PECAN, ALTUS, OK 73521 (680) 482-4781 EL-TAKECH, HAISSAM G, MD SAVATH, KRISTEN M, MD Provider 1D; 2002961108 101 S PARK LN ALTUS, OK 73521 (680) 379-6100 “Languoge() other han English Spanish Jefferson RINGLING Family Practice No age restrictions FAMILY CLINIC OF RINGLING RHC Provider ID: 100730660E 904 S 6TH RINGLING, OK 73456 (680) 662-2316 FAVORITE, GREGORY R, PA LINZMAN, ROD F, DO RYAN Family Practice No age restrictions DINGLER, LEONARD T, MD Provider ID: 100167950B 514 WASHINGTON RYAN, OK 73565 (680) 757-2224 RYAN RURAL HEALTH CLINIC Provider 1D: 1007306600 1104 § 6TH ST RYAN, OK 73565 (580) 757-2451 FAVORITE, GREGORY R, PA HOCH, STEPHEN E, PA. LINZMAN, ROD F, DO WAURIKA Family Practice No age restrictions BRYAN, STEPHANIE M, DO Provider ID: 200181450A. HIGHWAY 81 & 70, WAURIKA, OK °73573 (680) 228-3669 HINSHAW, STEVEN D, DO Provider ID: 100258380A 110 W BROADWAY WAURIKA, OK 73573 (680) 228-3527 LINZMAN, ROD F, DO Provider ID: 1000890408, HIGHWAY 81 & 70 JCT WAURIKA, OK 73573 (680) 228-3669 Johnston MILBURN Family Practice No age restrictions MILBURN FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC Provider ID: 200328450A 104 W FAVE, MILBURN, OK 73450 (680) 443-3533 SALLEE, CASSANDRA L, PA WEATHERS, PAUL E, OO NOVEMBER 2011 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY‘Medical Home Providers by County and Specialty Medicos por condado y por especialidad Johnston County TISHOMINGO Family Practice ‘No age restrictions FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF SO OKLAHOMA, Provider ID: 200018910C 610 E 24TH ST TISHOMINGO, OK 73460 (680) 371-2343 “Languages other than English Spanish ‘CROSS, GLENDA G, ARNP FICHTENBERG, HANS, DO HENDRIX, MICHAEL D; DO LEE, ERIC 8, DO NCELHANY, UNA L, ARNP PLUMMER, KEITH 6, PA REEL, PAUL A, DO REYNOLDS, NICHOLAS T, DO STANBERRY, TOMMIE G, PA FIRST CHOICE WELLNESS CENTER Provider ID: 2001171408 302 W MAIN ST. TISHOMINGO, OK 73460 (580) 371-0500 GRATZ, ADDIE B, ARNP Internal Medicine No age restrictions ADLAON, WELLIE P, MD Provider ID: 1002249900 508 E 24TH ST TISHOMINGO, OK 73460 (580) 371-9197 WAPANUCKA. Family Practice No age restrictions WEILAND, SANDRA A, ARNP Provider ID: 2000461904 4102 N CHOCTAW WAPANUCKA, OK 73461 (680) 937-8900 “Lanquee() other han English Spanish Kay BLACKWELL Family Practice No age restrictions JEFFERY R SHUART MD PC Provider ID: 1007511708 1009 W FERGUSON AVE BLACKWELL, OK 74631 (680) 363-0082 Internal Medicine 21-99 Years of Age GHORMLEY, LUTHER W, MD Provider ID: 1001645106 115 W BRIDGE AVE. BLACKWELL, OK 74631 (680) 363-0410 PONCA CITY Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age PHYSICIANS URGENT CARE CENTER Provider 1D: 100707120¢ 4201 E HARTFORD AVE PONCA CITY, OK 74601 (680) 762-1911 AGHA, AHMAD 8, MD ‘ALLEN, MELINDA R, DO HOVSEPIAN, KIMBERLY, PA LAMPE, RUTH L, ARNP- MOYER, GARY #, MD OATMAN, MARK’, MD THOMAS, MARK Y, PA Pediatrics 0-14 Years of Age NORPC-INC a 418 FAIRVIEW STE 100 PONCA CITY, OK 74601 (680) 765-5569 AGHA, AHMAD S, MD PETERS, BRENDA L, ARNP SINTON, PETER M, HD WALKER, MICHAEL S, MO jatrics 0578 Yeers of Age HOLDEN, JOHN W, MD Provider ID: 100825020F 427 FAIRVIEW AVE PONCA CITY, OK 74601 (680) 765-9289 Kingfisher HENNESSEY Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age FERRELL, CHARLES W, MD Provider ID: 2001701608 500 N MAIN ST. HENNESSEY, OK 73742 (405) 853-2995 Family Practice No age restrictions OSU-AJ HENNESSEY MEDICAL CLINIC Provider 1D: 200069200Y 300 N CHEROKEE ST HENNESSEY, OK 73742 (405) 853-7174 HENDERSON, SARAH K, PA REINSCHMIEDT, DALE B, DO KINGFISHER Family Practice 18-99 Years of Age ARTHURS, STEPHEN R, MD Provider ID: 100129240C 1100 HOSPITAL CIR. KINGFISHER, OK’ 73750 (405) 375-2360 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 2011 aMedical Home Providers by County and Specialty Kiowa County Medicos por condado y por especialidad 7 ‘SCHUMPERT JR, B DON, DO Kiowa Latimer Provider ID: 100118670B 304 HIGHWAY 59 N HOBART WILBURTON HEAVENER, OK 74937 (G18) 653-2818 Family Practice Family Practico No age restrictions No age restrictions POTEAU BRIDWELL, MALCOLM E, MD BOLING, KIMBERLY A, PA Family Practice Provider 1D;"100092810A, Provider 1D: 2001334304. 0-18 Years of Age 125 N BROADWAY. HOBART, OK 73651 (680) 726-3396 JACKSON, SAMANTHA L, MD Provider 1D: 1001317500 413 W FOREST LN HOBART, OK 73651 (680) 726-2226 KRIEGER, MICHAEL D, MD Provider ID: 1001175308, 401 W FOREST LN HOBART, OK 73651 (680) 726-5627 Internal Medicine 16-99 Years of Age ELLIS, MARGARET P, MD Provider 1D: 1002292908 708 NHILL ST. HOBART, OK 73651 (680) 726-5683, SNYDER Family Practice 199 Years of Age STACEY, KENDRA K, ARNP Provider iD: 1001936808 823 D ST SNYDER, OK 73566 (680) 5692373, 806 HIGHWAY 2 N WILBURTON, OK 74578 (918) 465-5716 CAMPBELL, DAVID W, DO Provider ID: 2001041008 ‘806 HIGHWAY 2. WILBURTON, OK 74578 (918) 466-5716 HUSSAINS FAMILY PRACTICE, Provider 1D: 200038910C 139 & MAIN WILBURTON, OK 74578 (918) 465-5727 HUSSAIN, AHMER, MD RANA JR, GERALD D, DO Provider ID: 1002140306 ‘806 HIGHWAY 2.N WILBURTON, OK 74578 (918) 465-0170 VALBUENA, RICARDO M, MD Provider ID: 1000644306 1107 W MAIN ST WILBURTON, OK 74578 (918) 465-5681 LeFlore HEAVENER Family Practice No age restrictions SCANTLING, MELINDA F, ARNP Provider ID: 1001026808 714 HIGHWAY 59 N HEAVENER, OK 74937 (918) 653-2345 “Language(s other than English Spanish QSU-AJ J SCOTT CLARK Do Provider ID: 2000915606 1103 DEWEY AVE, POTEAU, OK 74953, (918) 6489777 CLARK, JONATHAN S, DO Family Practice 10-99 Years of Age WEDDLE, CAROL A, ARNP Provider 1D: 2002447608 104 WALL ST POTEAU, OK 74953 (918) 635-3521 Family Practice No age restrictions ASHFORD, SHANE J, DO Provider ID: 200250680A 104 WALL ST. POTEAU, OK 74953 (918) 647-8635 BELL, RONDA L, ARNP Provider ID: 2003211108 1103 DEWEY AVE. POTEAU, OK 74953 (918) 648.377 COBB, KIMBERLY K, ARNP Provider ID: 2002555206 41013 E DEWEY AVE. POTEAU, OK 74953 (918) 647-2929 GREGORY, MYRA A, DO Provider ID: 100120120F 2202 N BROADWAY ST POTEAU, OK 74953 (918) 647-9833, NOVEMBER 2011 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITYMedical Home Providers by County and Specialty Medicos por condado y por especialidad LeFlore County HUSSAIN, AHMER, MD Provider 1D: 1001086906 1001 N BROADWAY ST POTEAU, OK 74953, (918) 465-5727 QSU-AJ DENNIS J CARTERDO Provider 1D: 200076210Y 4013 E DEWEY AVE POTEAU, OK 74953 (918) 647-2929 CARTER, DENNIS J, DO RODRIGUEZ, LINDA M, DO Provider ID: 100256710 405 WALL ST POTEAU, OK 74953 (918) 647-8635, ‘STEVEN P MEDEIROS DO INC Provider ID: 100740880A 104 WALL ST POTEAU, OK 74953 (918) 638-3578 MEDEIROS, JULIA.J, ARNP PIERSING, JOHN E, PA WILLIS, WILLIAM A, MD Provider ID: 1001175508 104 WALL ST POTEAU, OK 74953 (918) 647-8635, SPRIO Family Practice No age restrictions OSU-AJ SPIRO HMA. Provider ID: 200119080Y 702W BROADWAY ST SPRIO, OK 74959 (918) 962-2442 DUNCAN-LARRY, NANCY R, PA TRENT, DAVID A, DO TRENT, JUDY H,00. WILLIAMS, ROBERT C, DO TALIHINA Family Practice ‘No age restrictions ‘TALIHINA COMMUNITY CLINIC Provider ID: 1002449801 205 DALLAS ST. TALIHINA, OK 74571 (680) 924-8280 TALIKINA COMMUNITY CLINIC -NI Provider 1D: 100244980 205 DALLAS ST TALIHINA, OK 74574, (580) 924-8260 Lincoin CHANDLER Family Practice 0-18 Years of Age a OKLA - KRISTEN SELLS Pi jer 1D: 200100700. TOR MANVEL AVE. CHANDLER, OK 74834 (405) 268-5252 MCCAULEY, COLM P, DO SELLS, KRISTIN L, PA DAVENPORT Family Practice No age restrictions DAVENPORT MEDICAL CENTER, LLC Provider ID: 2003307108 202 N BROADWAY DAVENPORT, OK 74026 (918) 377-2237 MILLER, SHERRY A, ARNP PRAGUE Family Practice ‘No age restrictions PRAGUE FAMILY CLINIC Provider 1D: 2002314006 1322 KLABZUBA AVE PRAGUE, OK 74864 (405) 567-2295 BECKER, MARILYN A, ARNP FOWLER, SCOTT J, DO. JACKSON, DARRYL W, DO ‘WARD, MARY A, PA STROUD Family Practice No age restrictions DARVIN, TEODORO A, MD Provider 1D: 1000545108 2306 W HIGHWAY 66 STROUD, OK 74079 (18) 968-3095 TSG PHYSICIANS GROUP LLC Provider ID: 2000618908 2308 W HIGHWAY 66 STROUD, OK 74079 (918) 968-4469 DARVIN, KENNETH T, MD MARKERT, GEORGE C, MD RICHARDS, WENDELL L, DO WELLSTON Family Practice No age restrictions MITCHELL, SHERRY D, ARNP Provider ID: 1004924208 309 W 2ND ST. WELLSTON, OK 74881 (405) 366-2998 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 2011 23Logan County Medical Home Providers by County and Specialty Medicos por condado y por especialidad Logan CRESCENT Family Practice No age restrictions CENTER FOR INTERNAL MEDICINE AND PEDIATRICS Provider ID: 100700110K 400 8 GRAND CRESCENT, OK 73028 (405) 969-2818 CURTESS, LISA A, PA GUTHRIE JR, DONALD A, PA RITTENHOUSE, LEE C, MD. TRAVIS, STEPHEN R, MD GUTHRIE Family Practice No age restrictions CENTER FOR INTERNAL MEDICINE AND PEDIATRICS Provider 1D: 100700110) 2919 S DIVISION ST. GUTHRIE, OK 73044 (405) 2826301 CRANFORD, ALTON R, PA CURTESS, LISA A, PA, JOHNSON, ROBIN R, ARNP LOPEZ MEJIA, GERARDO, MD MCGUIRE, CARRIE H, PA MORGAN, ANGELA K, MD MYERS, HOWARD P, MD. PAYNE, KATHERINE J, PA PETERS, CASEY L, MD REED, EMILY K, MD. SMITH, MARIA A, ARNP JOHNSON, ROBIN R, ARNP Provider ID: 2002654504 205 S ACADEMY RD GUTHRIE, OK 73044 (405) 282-6301 KREHBIEL, TODD A, MD Provider ID: 1001368300 205 S ACADEMY RD GUTHRIE, OK 73044 (405) 282-9449 LORIMOR, MARGARET A, THACKERVILLE NI Provider 1D: 200196570A Family Practice 2077 & COLLEGE, AVE 18-99 Years of Age GUTHRIE, OK 73044 ‘SPROTT, DANA C, FNP (405) 282-3698 Provider iD; 2002062508 104 LANGSTON Fee ox 1 ily Pract IACKERVILLE, OK 73459 Roe eretons (a0) 276-9006 “Langue athe han English MARY MAHONEY LANGSTON Spent FQHC Provider 1D: 1007091206 = 300 N MARTIN LUTHER KING AVE Major LANGSTON, OK 73050 (405) 466-2535 FAIRVIEW AYITEY, ROSEMARY N, MD Family Practice SEURTSS Cane D, ARNE Family Practice, FAIRVIEW REGIONAL Love MEDICAL CENTER Provider 1D: 100700800C MARIETTA SIDE STATE RD ‘ FAIRVIEW, OK 73737 Family Practice (680) 227-3721 No age restrictions SENTON, JAM, MD LOVE COUNTY RURAL KAMUGISHA, LAURA, MD HEALTH CENTER KLINGER, DONALD R, DO Provider 1D: 1006999606 MARIETTA, OK 73448 Marshall een 20) 270 20 nt KINGSTON Fomly Practice WALL TAD APA Fee eee ARN, PA OCONNOR, JOHN T, DO_ ‘AHEARN, PAMELA E, MD ‘OWENS, PATRICIA C, ARNP- Provider ID: 100102140B ons aT Pare (580) 564-0200 amily Practice ‘No age restrictions KINGSTON MEDICAL CLINIC Provider ID: 100700440 700 § MUNCRIEF @ HWY 70 KINGSTON, OK 73439 (580) 564-4944 CONLEY, JOHN D, DO NOVEMBER 2011 OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY