Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
December 2012
Continued from page 1 an agreed-upon share of any recovered proceeds. If the claim is successful, either through litigation or settlement, the funder receives a portion or percentage of the recovery. But if the claim is not successful, the funder does not recoup the litigation costs, which are the principal of its loan. In essence, the scholars contend, third-party litigation funding extends contingency fees to non-lawyers. Where it gets sticky, says Travis Akin, executive director of Illinois Lawsuit Abuse Watch, is that often the interest
REFORM
rates on these loans run as high as 300 percent - similar to a payday loan scenario - and the interest accrues the entire time that the lawsuit is going on, which could be a couple of years or more. Even if the plaintiff is fortunate enough to get a settlement within 15 to 17 months, he or she is still paying an exorbitant amount of interest, Akin said. And in some cases, the plaintiff has to take the case all the way to trial because the settlement he or she was being offered wasnt enough to cover the loan.
Both Akin and McKinney site numerous horror stories of situations such as the above, where a plaintiffs indebtedness due to a lawsuit lending decision made the settlement option unviable. In some situations, the plaintiff continued on to trial and ultimately lost the case. Several plantiffs attorneys weve spoken with are very concerned about lawsuit lending from the perspective that all too often they are unaware that the lender is approaching and negotiating terms with their own clients, said Akin. As it now stands, at least in Illinois, theres no legislation barring lawsuit lenders from approaching clients directly without going through their attorney. Illinois Lawsuit Abuse Watch has its eyes and ears open as the General Assembly prepares to reconvene in Springfield in January. Akin says back in late 2010, SB 3322, known then as the Lawsuit Loan Shark Bill, set out to grant lawsuit lending companies a full range of rules of operation in Illinois without fear of regulatory restraint. The bill, co-sponsored by Sen. Don Harmon (D-Oak Park) and State Rep. Jay Hoffman (D-Collinsville), passed unanimously in the Senate but was soundly defeated in the House. Akin says the fact that SB 3322 was introduced during a lame duck session gives ILAW and ATRA incentive
to stand guard during the upcoming lame duck session (Jan. 3-8) to make sure a similar bill is not reintroduced. Were concerned that there may be an effort during the January lame duck session to provide the loan industry with protections to push this legislation in Illinois, Akin said, and were going to have a big fight on our hands during the early part of 2013. Theres been more of a push lately from the lawsuit lending industry to open new markets in more states and allow the regulatory framework to make that happen. But its not good for consumers, and we would argue that its not good for our state. Illinois is already ranked 46 out of 50 states in legal fairness and weve got three Judicial Hellholes, two of them in Southwestern Illinois (Madison and St. Clair counties). You dont invest in something without the expectation that there might be more of that (consumer) behavior, and that your investment will pay off. In this case, you dont invest in lawsuits unless you expect that there will be more lawsuits. This entire business model is banking on more lawsuits in Illinois, which is the last thing we need. Oasis Legal Finance, based in Chicago and one of the largest lawsuit lenders in the U.S., did not respond to requests for an interview for this story.