Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
LEARNING GOALS
Laplace circuit solutions Showing the usefulness of the Laplace transform Circuit Element Models Transforming circuits into the Laplace domain Analysis Techniques All standard analysis techniques, KVL, KCL, node, loop analysis, Thevenins theorem are applicable Transfer Function The concept is revisited and given a formal meaning Pole-Zero Plots/Bode Plots Establishing the connection between them Steady State Response AC analysis revisited
di (t ) dt di VS ( s ) = RI ( s ) + LL i = iC + i p Initial conditions dt di KVL : v S (t ) = Ri ( t ) + L (t ) are automatically di P dt = sI ( s ) i (0) = sI ( s ) included L a dt Complementary equation r 1 1 I ( s) = diC t = RI ( s ) + LsI ( s ) (t ) = 0 iC (t ) = K C e t i RiC (t ) + L s ( R + Ls ) s dt 1/ L K K2 Only algebra c I ( s) = R = 1+ t t RK C e + LK C (e ) = 0 = u s ( R / L + s ) s s + R / L is needed L l 1 Particular solution for this case a K1 = sI ( s ) |s =0 = No need to R v S = 1 = RK p i p (t ) = K p r 1 search for R Use boundary conditions particular K 2 = ( s + R / L) I ( s ) | s = R / L = t 1 R or complei (t ) = + K C e L v (t) = 0 for t < 0 i( 0 ) = 0 S R R mentary t 1 R L ; t > 0 t i ( t ) = 1 e 1 solutions 1 e L ; t > 0 i (t ) = 2 R R v S (t ) = Ri (t ) + L
Comple mentary
LEARNING BY DOING
Find v (t ), t > 0
v vS R
C
vS
dv dt
1 s 1 1 / RC = V ( s) = s ( RCs + 1) s ( s + 1 / RC ) RCsV ( s ) + V ( s ) =
Use partial fractions to determine inverse
dv v v S + =0 R dt
V ( s) =
1 / RC K K2 = 1+ s ( s + 1 / RC ) s s + 1 / RC
RC
dv + v = vS dt
K1 = sV ( s ) |s =0 = 1
dv RCL + V ( s ) = VS ( s ) dt
K 2 = ( s + 1 / RC )V ( s ) |s = 1 / RC = 1
v (t ) = 1 e
t RC ,
t0
Independent sources v S ( t ) VS ( s )
Resistor
i S (t ) I S ( s)
Dependent sources v D (t ) = AiC (t ) VD ( s ) = AI C ( s )
v (t ) = Ri (t )
V ( s ) = RI ( s )
Capacitor: Model 1
Source transformation
I eq
v (0) = s = Cv (0) 1 Cs
I ( s) t L i ( x )dx = s 0
1t v (t ) = i ( x )dx + v (0) C0
I ( s ) = CsV ( s ) Cv (0)
Impedance in parallel with current source
5
Inductor Models
di L = sI ( s ) i (0) dt
v (t ) = L
di (t ) dt
V ( s ) = L( sI ( s ) i (0)) I ( s) = V ( s ) i (0) + Ls s
V ( s ) = LsI ( s ) Li (0)
I ( s) =
V ( s ) i (0) + Ls s
6
Mutual Inductance
v1 (t ) = L1
di1 di (t ) + M 2 (t ) dt dt di di v2 (t ) = M 1 (t ) + L2 2 (t ) dt dt
V1 ( s ) = L1sI1 ( s ) L1i1 (0) + MsI 2 ( s ) Mi2 (0) V2 ( s ) = MsI1 ( s ) Mi1 (0) + LsI 2 ( s ) Li2 (0)
Combine into a single source in the primary Single source in the secondary
LEARNING BY DOING
Determine the model in the s-domain and the expression for the voltage across the inductor
i ( 0) = 1 A
KVL : 1 = (1 + s ) I ( s )
Ohm' s Law
V ( s ) = 1 I ( s )
Equivalent circuit in s-domain
V ( s) =
1 s +1
ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
All the analysis techniques are applicable in the s-domain LEARNING EXAMPLE Draw the s-domain equivalent and find the voltage in both s-domain and time domain One needs to determine the initial voltage across the capacitor
I S ( s) =
3 s +1
i S (t ) = 0, t < 0
v o (0) = 0
Vo ( s ) = 1 Vo ( s ) = R || I S ( s) Cs R 3 Cs I ( s ) = 1 / C 3 10 Vo ( s ) = 1 S s + 1 / RC s +1 R+ Cs
LEARNING EXAMPLE
Write the loop equations in the s-domain Do not increase number of loops
L1s ( I 2 ( s ) I1 ( s )) +
1 ( I 2 ( s ) I1 ( s )) + ( L2 s + R2 ) I 2 ( s ) 10 C2 s
LEARNING EXAMPLE
Node V1 I A ( s)
i (0) i1 (0) C1v1 (0) + 2 = s s 1 1 1 G1 + + + C1s V1 ( s ) + C1s V2 ( s ) L s L1s L2 s 2 Node V2 I B ( s ) C 2v2 (0) + C1v1 (0)
11
LEARNING EXAMPLE Find vo (t ) using node analysis, loop analysis, superposit ion,
Vo ( s ) Vo ( s ) V1 ( s ) + = 02 1 2 s (1 + s 2 )V1 ( s ) s 2Vo ( s ) =
4 s + 12 2s s (1 + s 2 ) 2 sV1 ( s ) + (1 + 2 s )Vo ( s ) = 0 Vo ( s ) = 8( s + 3) (1 + s ) 2
12
Loop Analysis
Loop 1 I1 ( s ) = Loop 2 1 12 s ( I 2 ( s ) I1 ( s )) + I 2 ( s ) + 2 I 2 ( s ) = s s 4( s + 3) I 2 ( s) = ( s + 1) 2 Vo ( s ) = 2 I 2 ( s ) = 8( s + 3) ( s + 1) 2 4 s
13
Source Superposition
' I2
Current divider
Vo' ( s ) = 2
s 4 1 2+ +2 s s
Voltage divider
8( s + 3) Vo ( s ) = V o ( s ) + V o ( s ) = ( s + 1) 2
' "
Vo" ( s ) =
12 2 1 2+ + s s s
14
Source Transformation
Vo ( s ) = 2
s 4 12 + 2 1 s + + 2 s s s
Vo ( s ) =
8( s + 3) ( s + 1) 2
ZTh
s2 + 1 1 = +s= s s
Voltage divider
VOC ( s ) =
12 4 4 s + 12 +s = s s s
Vo ( s ) =
2 4 s + 12 s2 + 1 s 2+ s 8( s + 3) ( s + 1) 2
16
Vo ( s ) =
ZTh = s
Current division
Vo ( s ) = 2 4 12 / s 4 s + 12 + = s s s2
I SC ( s ) =
4 s + 12 s 1 s2 s+ +2 s 8( s + 3) Vo ( s ) = ( s + 1) 2
17
LEARNING EXAMPLE Determine the voltage vo (t ). Assume all initial conditions to be zero Selecting the analysis technique: . Three loops, three non-reference nodes . One voltage source between non-reference nodes - supernode . One current source. One loop current known or supermesh . If v_2 is known, v_o can be obtained with a voltage divider
(1 / 2)( s + 1)(V2 ( s ) 12 / s ) 2(V2 ( s ) / 2 + 6 / s ) + V2 ( s ) /( s + 1) = 0 12 s V ( s) V ( s) V ( s) KCL@ supernode : 1 + 1 2 I ( s ) + 2 =0 2 2/ s s +1 V ( s) Controlling variable : I ( s ) = 1 2 1 Voltage divider : V0 ( s ) = V2 ( s ) s +1 Supernode constraint : V2 ( s ) V1 ( s ) = V2 ( s ) = 12( s + 1)( s + 3) s ( s 2 + 4 s + 5) 12( s + 3) s ( s 2 + 4 s + 5)
18
Vo ( s ) =
Continued ...
VOC 12 / s
12 / s +
VOC 12 / s VOC 12 / s + 2I '= 0 2 2/ s 12 VOC 12 / s VOC ( s ) = I '= s 2 I '+ (2 I ' ) /( 2 / s ) 2 I ' = 0 I '= 0
19
Continued
Analysis in the s-domain has established that the Laplace transform of the output voltage is
12(1 + j1) 12 245 One can also use = K = ( s + 2 j1)V ( s ) | = 1 o s = 2 + j1 (2 + j1)( j 2) 5153.43(290) quadratic factors... = 3.79 198.43 = 3.79161.57 36 C o C1 ( s + 2) C2 12( s + 3) vo (t ) = + 7.59e 2 t cos(t + 161.57 u(t ) Vo ( s ) = + = + 5 (s + 2)2 + 1 s ( s + 2)2 + 1 ( s + 2)2 + 1 s
Equating coefficien ts of s 2 : 0 = C o + C1
LEARNING EXTENSION
Vo + VS
VS
Vo
* K1 K1 + 2 | K1 | e t cos( t + K1 ) u(t ) ( s + j ) ( s + + j )
KCL at supernode
1 15 I o ( s) | 1 K1 = s + j s= + j 4 4 4
1 15 1 6 + j 4 4 = 15 15 4 2j 4
6.33 66.72 2 V ( s) V ( s) K1 = = 6.53 156.72 Cs (Vo ( s ) + VS ( s )) + o + o =0 0.9790 s Ls 2 12 V ( s) VS ( s ) = , I o ( s ) = o t 15 2 s io (t ) = 13.06e 4 cos t 156.72 4 Doing the algebra 1 6s 1 6s = I o ( s) = 2 2 s + 0.5 s + 1 1 15 + s + 4 16 * K1 1 6s K1 I o ( s) = = + 1 15 1 15 1 15 1 15 s + j s + + j s + j s + + j 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 21
LEARNING EXTENSION
I 2 ( s) =
K0 K1 K2 + + s s + 0.27 s + 3.73
supermesh
K 0 = sI 2 ( s ) |s =0 = 2
I 2 ( s) =
16 s + 2 16 s + 2 = s ( s 2 + 4 s + 1) s ( s + 0.27)( s + 3.73)
TRANSIENT CIRCUIT ANALYSIS USING LAPLACE TRANSFORM For the study of transients, especially transients due to switching, it is important to determine initial conditions. For this determination, one relies on the properties: 1. Voltage across capacitors cannot change discontinuously 2. Current through inductors cannot change discontinuously LEARNING EXAMPLE Determine vo ( t ), t > 0
i L( 0 )
+ vC ( 0 )
Assume steady state for t<0 and determine voltage across capacitors and currents through inductors
For DC case capacitors are open circuit inductors are shortcircu it vC (0) = 1V , i L (0) = 1A
23
Vo ( s ) =
2s + 7 2 s 2 + 3s + 2
b 2 4ac < 0
Laplace Circuit for t>0
* K1 K1 Vo ( s ) = + 3 7 3 7 s+ j s+ + j 4 4 4 4
3 7 = 2.14 76.5 K1 = s + j Vo ( s ) 4 4 3 7 s = + j
4 4 * K1 K1 + 2 | K1 | e t cos( t + K1 ) u(t ) ( s + j ) ( s + + j )
4 ( s + 1) I1 sI 2 = + 1 s s
Solve for I2
vo (t ) = 4.28 cos(
2 1 sI1 + ( s + 1 + ) I 2 = 1 ( s + 1) s s I 2 ( s) = 2s 1 2 1 Vo ( s ) = I 2 ( s ) + s s 2 s 2 + 3s + 2
7 t 76.5) 4
24
LEARNING EXTENSION
Determine i1 (t ), t > 0
i L (0 ) = i L ( 0 + ) = 1 A
I1 ( s ) =
s i1 (t ) = e 9 t u( t ) s+9
12 6
I1 ( s )
2s
1 s
Current divider
25
I1 ( s ) =
2s 1 2 s + 18 s
LEARNING EXTENSION
Determine vo (t ), t > 0
2s
+
8 V 3
+ Vo (s )
Vo ( s ) =
i L ( 0)
2 12 8 + (voltage divider) 4 + 2s s 3
Vo ( s ) =
i12V = 2 A
(8 s + 36) K1 K 2 + = s s+2 3s ( s + 2) 10 3
26
2 i4V = A 3 i L (0) = 4 A 3
K1 = sVo ( s ) |s =0 = 6
K 2 = ( s + 2)Vo ( s ) |s =2 = 8 v o ( t ) = 6 e 2 t u( t ) 3
TRANSFER FUNCTION
X (s )
System with all initial conditions set to zero
Y (s )
Y ( s) x (t ) = (t ) X ( s ) = 1 X ( s) H(s) can also be interpreted as the Laplace If the model for the system is a differential transform of the output when the input is an impulse and all initial conditions are zero equation H ( s) =
dny d n1 y dy bn n + bn1 n1 + ... + b1 + bo y dt dt dt dmx d m 1 x dx = am m + am 1 m 1 + ... + a1 + ao x dt dt dt If all initial conditions are zero
d k y k L k = s Y (s ) dt bn s nY ( s ) + ... + b1sY ( s ) + b0Y ( s )
= am s m X ( s ) + ... + a1sX ( s ) + a0 X ( s ) bn s n + ... + b1s + b0 Y ( s) = X ( s) m am s + ... + a1s + a0
27
The inverse transform of H(s) is also called the impulse response of the system If the impulse response is known then one can determine the response of the system to ANY other input
Vo ( s ) = H ( s )Vi ( s )
H ( s) =
1 s +1 10 Vi ( s ) = s+2
Vo ( s ) =
K K 10 = 1 + 2 ( s + 1)( s + 2) s +1 s + 2
28
h(t ) = Ke
h(t ) = Ke o t cos( o 1 2 t + )
poles : s1, 2 = 0 0 2 1
+ K 2 e ( 0 0
2 1 ) t
29
LEARNING EXAMPLE
Transform the circuit to the Laplace domain. All initial conditions set to zero
b) C = 16F c) C = 32F
Vi (s )
Mesh analysis
Vi ( s ) = 2 I1 I 2
1 0 = I1 + 1 + s + I2 sC (1 / 2C ) Vo ( s ) = 2 s + (1 / 2) s + 1 / C
Vo ( s ) =
1 I 2 ( s) sC
30
LEARNING EXAMPLE
Determine the transfer function, the type of damping and the unit step response
V1 ( s ) VS ( s ) V1 ( s ) V1 ( s ) V1 ( s ) V0 ( s ) + + + =0 1 1 1 1 s 1 Vo ( s ) 32 = VS ( s ) s 2 + 1 s + 1 2 o 0 = 0.25 2 16
Transform the circuit to the Laplace domain. All initial conditions set to zero
2 o
=1
VS ( s ) = 1 s
V+ = 0 V1 ( s ) Vo ( s ) + =0 1 V1 ( s ) = sVo ( s ) 1 s
= 0.5
s = 0.25
31
LEARNING EXTENSION
H ( s) =
s + 10 s2 + 4s + 8
Determine the pole-zero plot, the type of damping and the unit step response
1 s + 10 Y ( s) = H ( s) = s s ( s 2 + 4 s + 8) s 2 + 4 s + 8 = ( s + 2 j 2)( s + 2 + j 2)
* K1 K2 K2 Y ( s) = + + s s + 2 j2 s + 2 + j2 * K1 K1 + 2 | K1 | e t cos( t + K1 ) u(t ) ( s + j ) ( s + + j ) 10 K1 = sY ( s ) |s =0 = 8 8 + j2 K 2 = ( s + 2 j 2)Vo ( s ) |s = 2+ j 2 = (2 + j 2)( j 4)
s2 + 4s + 8 = 0
s1, 2 = 2 j 2
x
j j2
10
s + 4s + 8
2
2 o
2 o
2 2
K2 =
Second order networks: variation of poles with damping ratio Normalized second order system
2 0 H ( s) = 2 2 s + 2 0 s + 0
LEARNING EXAMPLE
2 o =
1 , LC
2 o =
R L 1 Cs
1 V ( s) LC = = Gv ( s ) = o 1 Vin ( s ) 1 + Ls + R R s2 + s + Cs LC L
= cos
33
LEARNING EXAMPLE The Tacoma Narrows Bridge Revisited Previously the event was modeled as a resonance problem. More detailed studies show that a model with a wind-dependent damping ratio provides a better explanation
d 2 d 2 + 2 o + o = 0 dt dt 2
= 42mph = 12
34
model d 2
.. .
d 2 + 2 o + o = 0 dt dt 2
=0
2 = (2 o + o )
integrator
adder
2 + 2 o + o
..
vi
v1
Simulation building blocks
Vi ( s ) V ( s ) + =0 1 R Cs 1 V ( s ) = Vi ( s ) R C s
( )
v2
V1 V2 V + + =0 R1 R2 R f Rf Rf V = R V1 + R V2 1 2
d 2 2 dt
d dt
36
POLE-ZERO PLOT/BODE PLOT CONNECTION Bode plots display magnitude and phase information of They show a cross section of G(s)
G ( s ) | s = j
s2 G ( s) = 2 s + 2s + 5 1 V ( s) LC = G ( s) = o 1 R Vin ( s ) s2 + s + LC L
If the poles get closer to imaginary axis the peaks and valleys are more pronounced
37
Cross section
38
Laplace uses positive time functions. Even for sinusoids the response contains transitory terms EXAMPLE H ( s ) = 1 , X ( s ) =
s +1
s ( s2 + 2
x (t ) = [cos t ]u(t ))
If interested in the steady state response only, then dont determine residues associated with transient terms
y (t ) = Ke t + 2 | K 2 | cos( t + K 2 ) u( t )
transient Steady state response
If x (t ) = X M cos( o t + )u(t )
y ss (t ) =| X M | H ( j o ) | cos( o t + H ( j o ) + )
X M cos t u(t ) =
1 XM X M jt XM e + e j t X ( s ) = + 2 2 s j o s + j o
LEARNING EXAMPLE
If x (t ) = X M cos( o t + )u(t )
y ss (t ) =| X M | H ( j o ) | cos( o t + H ( j o ) + )
o = 2, X M = 10
Transform the circuit to the Laplace domain. Assume all initial conditions are zero
s2 Vi ( s ) Vo ( s ) = 2 3s + 4 s + 4
s2 H ( s) = 2 3s + 4 s + 4
KCL@V1 :
V1 Vi V1 V1 + + =0 2 2 2 +1 s 1 Voltage divider : Vo = V1 2 +1 s
40
LEARNING EXTENSION
If x (t ) = X M cos( o t + )u(t )
y ss (t ) =| X M | H ( j o ) | cos( o t + H ( j o ) + ) Vo ( s ) = 2 VOC ( s ) 2 + ZTh ( s ) 2 1 Vi ( s ) s2 + s + 1 s + 1 2+ s +1
o = 2, X M = 12
Transform circuit to Laplace domain. Assume all initial conditions are zero Thevenin
Vo ( s ) =
Vi (s )
1 s
41
LEARNING BY APPLICATION
Gvp ( s ) =
1 Grp ( s )
p = 318s
zeros : z1 = 13.33kr / s [2.12kHz ],
42
LEARNING BY DESIGN
Filtering noise in a data transmission line Noise source is 100kHz SOLUTION: Insert a second order low-pass filter in the path. Should not affect data signal and should attenuate noise
Proposed filter
V1 V = 0
R 1 3 R R R C C Vo ( s ) 1 2 3 1 2 = 1 Vdata ( s ) 1 1 1 s 2 + s + + + RC R C R C R2 R3C1C 2 1 1 2 1 3 1
2 s 2 + 2 o s + o
R1 = R2 = R3
o =
V1 Vdata V1 V V V + + 1 + 1 o =0 R3 R1 (1 / C1s ) R2 V1 Vo + =0 R2 (1 / C 2 s )
1 3 C2 , = R C1C 2 2 C1
>1
Below 100k
43
= 2 105
Select R = 40k, 0 = 25,000, = 2. Use design equations and determine C1 = 0.75nF , C 2 = 1.33nF
The filter eliminates noise but smooths data pulse 25kbps data transfer rate Filtered signal is useless REDESIGN!
44
noise
=1
Design equations
0 = 150,000 = =1=
3 C2 2 C1
1 40,000 C1C 2
APPLICATION LAPLACE
45