Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Summer, 2012-2013
Editorial
Welcome to the summer 2012-2013 edition of our newsletter, The Vibe. We trust you had a very Happy Christmas and a fun New Years celebration. In this edition, we celebrate the warmer months by providing you with information on hot topics that affect a large number of our clients. Craig Ellis opens the bowling on page 2 with advice about what to do if youre injured in a car accident. On the same page, Dino Di Rosa talks about Probate and why its important. Turning to page 3, Katherine Stavrou explains what the Family Courts do when deciding how to divide the assets of marital and de facto relationships. Anna Ardolino then talks about the significance of Property Interest Reports. On the back page, we have some legal newsbytes and our Free First Hour Interview Offer. Happy reading!
* Its the vibe of the thing, your Honour Dennis Denuto (Tiriel Mora), The Castle (1997)
Dino Di Rosa
Principal
Business law Family Law Estates and estate planning
Craig Ellis
Accident Compensation General litigation
Katherine Stavrou
Family Law & Wills and estates
Anna Ardolino
Conveyancing Paralegal support
Adelaide Office: 61 Carrington Street Adelaide SA 5000 Ph: 8237 0559 Fx: 8354 2099
Torrensville Office: 150 South Road Torrensville SA 5031 Ph: 8354 2233 Fax: 8354 2099
Areas of practice: Family Law Business Law Wills, Estates & Estate Planning Property Law & Conveyancing
Page 2
Page 3
How do Family Courts decide who gets what? Katherine Stavrou explains
How do the Family Law Courts decide who gets what in a property settment?
There is a common misconception that assets of a marriage or de facto relationship are divided 50/50 so who needs lawyers, particularly if there is agreement between spouses. Not true! The Family Law Courts have a four step process when determining who gets what and the outcome is never always simple. They have a wide discretion to consider all relevant issues. Here are the four steps. 1. Determining the net asset pool contributions, or non-financial contributions, such as contributions as a homemaker and parent)? Clients sometimes think that because one party is the main breadwinner they are entitled to more than the other party. Again not true. ALL contributions are taken into account, whether they are financial or non-financial. 3. Future needs
What are the needs of the parties, such as whether or not one of the parties will have the full-time care and control of children under the age of eighteen years, the health and mental capacity of each of the parties and their ability to obtain employment. This concept is very often misunderstood and could mean as much as 5% or 10% difference to the division of assets based on contributions alone. The larger the asset pool to be divided, the bigger the impact on the settlement. 4. What is just and equitable
What are the value of the assets and liabilities of each spouse at the current date? People sometimes think that only assets at separation are considered. This is not true. All assets are considered no matter whether they existed before the parties lived together or whether they were acquired after separation, and it is the current value that is relevant, not what the values of the assets were at separation. 2. Contributions of the parties
What is ultimately just and reasonable in the circumstances of each individual case? Another concept that few people are aware of or understand. The Family Law Courts have considerable discretion to make allowances for different situations even after considering steps 2 and 3. As you can see, there is no one answer. Each marital or de facto relationship is different and needs to be treated on its own facts. What you thought might be an easy 50/50 split, might not be the case at all. You might be losing out or exposing yourself to a big claim, which is why we recommend specialist legal advice and, if necessary, representation. Please call us for family law advice.
What contributions did each of the parties make towards those assets and the marriage (whether direct or indirect financial contri-
issue of how they are to be cared for if they are, for example, in the terminal phase of an illness. We dont like the term living will as its not a will at all; we prefer to refer to them as medical powers of attorney and powers of guardianship. Short of euthanasia, it is possible for a guardian appointed under a power of guardianship to give permission or to refuse to consent to life saving medical intervention if the expected quality of life of the person involved is thereafter poor.
Cut or tear off the coupon below, and you will be eligible for a free first hour consultation with one of our lawyers. Conditions Apply.
Name:
Referred by:
Adelaide Office: 61 Carrington Street Adelaide SA 5000 Ph: 8237 0559 Fx: 8354 2099
Torrensville Office: 150 South Road Torrensville SA 5031 Ph: 8354 2233 Fax: 8354 2099
Promotion Expires Correspondence: 1 April 2012 PO Pox 315 Torrensville Plaza SA 5031 E: admin@dirosalawyers.com.au W: www.dirosalawyers.com.au
Areas of practice: Family Law Business Law Wills, Estates & Estate Planning Property Law & Conveyancing
DISCLAIMER: This newsletter is for general information purposes only. It is not intended for the purpose of giving legal advi ce. The views expressed in this newsletter are not necessarily those of Di Rosa Lawyers. Di Rosa Lawyers has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that the material contained in this newsletter is correct. However, Di Rosa Lawyers gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material. Readers are advised not to rely solely on thi s information when making any decision. Readers should seek independent legal advice in relation to any issue which may affect them.