Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Today is December 10, which is Human Rights Day. Sixtyfive years ago, the United Nations issued the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This day holds a special meaning for the development of democracy and human rights in Taiwan. Thirty-three years ago, in order to pursue democracy, freedom and human rights for Taiwan, the Taiwanese people took to the streets, receiving in return, brutal suppression by the mili
tary police in Kaohsiung and were later sent to military courts. As I was just a little over 30 years-old, that was my first time in front of the military courts as a defense lawyer for those persecuted in the Formosa Incident. During those times, the power of the Taiwanese people and those from the Tangwai (former opposition) movement formed a great union, which later bred the
Democratic Progressive Party of today. Along the road, the DPP moved forward in order to purse the universal values of democracy, freedom and human rights, and ever since the DPP first gained power, it vigorously promoted the UNs International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights so they could be incorporated into Taiwans legislaPAGE 1
tion, but without a majority in the legislature, it was heavily blocked by the KMT. Even though the KMT took over the reins of government and finally passed the two covenants, we still see President Ma Yingjeou unable to put them into true practice. From the past four years, we have seen that the actions from President Mas administration have allowed a decline of human rights and democracy. Furthermore, we see a complete lack of reform related to the two covenants and a lack of real and concrete actions. From a recent poll released by the DPPs Survey Center, as well as polls released by other organizations, there is clearly a new phenomenon displayed by the Taiwanese people, which is a recurring concern and dissatisfaction over human rights. This also shows that under the administration of President Ma, human rights in Taiwan have step-by-step gone into decline and the current democratic system is going through a serious crisis. In the two areas of judiciary and the media, this is especially obvious. Since the second transfer of power, the abuse by prosecutors in the judiciary have been too numerous to count, and this is how affairs has been conducted in the judiciary. As society was paying wide attention, public prosecutors unjustly went after former DPP officials. Purposely spreading rumors and violating the principle of privacy, they gave information to the media outlet of their choice, painting former DPP officials as having committed atrocious crimes. However, through years of legal battles, they were found notguilty, indemnified from the miscarriage of justice, but given that it is already a miscarriage of justice, compensation will not be able to bring their honor and dignity back, and their life and reputation have already been ruined. Along the same lines, the degree of abuse in power by government agencies has also brought great pain. It is not surprising that in every poll released, the peoples trust towards the judiciary is extremely low. This is very disadvantageous for the health of Taiwans democratic development and human rights. In the media environment, Taiwans press freedom has gone through serious deterioration. Freedom House has warned that in the past three years, Taiwans press freedom ranking has continuously declined. Additionally, Chinas interference into reporting methods is also a critical concern. From the recent business deals creating media conglomeration, there are suspicions and worries that there is a China factor involved. Channels that should be public in nature are becoming privatized. So it is the China
DECEMBER 2012 factor that is posing the greatest threat to Taiwans democracy. Surveying the past, even under the martial law era controlled by the KMTs one-party autocracy, Taiwan was able to break through martial law, ending the press ban and seeking for freedom and human rights protection. This came as a result of the concerns shown by several international organizations and many of our international friends from the United States, Japan and other countries. The DPP, as a party that has pursued democracy, freedom and human rights, facing now with the decline of human rights in Taiwan and the crisis in our democracy development, will not stand idle. We are sincerely calling the attention of democratic countries around the world to know the reality that Taiwans democracy is going through a crisis. Furthermore, today, we are announcing that the DPP plans to organize a big protest march, appealing to all the public to join forces with the DPP in order to protect Taiwans democracy. We hope that the people can express their anxieties and concerns to those holding power. The DPP also hopes that the international community pays greater concern to Taiwan and show their support. Lets not allow Taiwan disappear from the team of global democracies. Thank You!
PAGE 2
DECEMBER 2012
1. Are you satisfied with the current guarantees in Taiwan for economic rights? Economic rights: fair tax system, protection of consumer rights, etc. Satisfied 23.0% Unsatisfied 67.5% No opinion 9.5%
2. Are you satisfied with the current guarantees in Taiwan for the protection of human rights in the judicial system? Judicial human rights: impartiality in judicial trials, proper treatment of inmates, etc. Satisfied 22.6% Unsatisfied 67.0% No opinion 10.4%
3. Are you satisfied with the current guarantees in Taiwan regarding environmental human rights? Environmental human rights: proper processing of garbage waste, non-contamination in public spaces, proper urban planning, etc. Satisfied 30.5% Unsatisfied 61.1% No opinion 8.5%
4. Are you satisfied with the current guarantees in Taiwan for the human rights protection of disadvantaged groups? Human rights protection of disadvantaged groups: fair treatment and proper assistance in the aspects of healthcare, education and employment for elderly, children, poor and disabled. Satisfied 29.6% Unsatisfied 64.0% No opinion 6.5%
5. Are you satisfied with the current guarantees in Taiwan for civil rights? Civil rights: guarantees in the legitimate rights and interests of the people, the government paying attention to public opinion.
PAGE 3
6. From an overall perspective, are you satisfied with the current guarantees in Taiwan regarding the protection of human rights? Satisfied 31.1% Unsatisfied 62.3% No opinion 6.6%
DECEMBER 2012
Chair Su Tseng-chang receives former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacic Affairs
DPP Chair Su Tseng-chang received Mr. Christopher Hill, former US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs on December 10. The hour-long meeting included discussions on the democratization of China and cross strait relations. Regarding cross strait relations, Chair Su said he believed that in facing China, the interactions must be friendly, but with no haste as there were still many problems within China itself. He emphasized that Taiwan should allow time for China to change gradually, showing patience and goodwill. He also pointed out that cross strait relations cant be solved by either side alone, and there are not just only cross strait conditions to be taken into consideration, but the entire region as well. The DPP believes that it is necessary to maintain peace, but in no condition should Taiwans sovereignty be forsaken, and this is what DPP has been and will always insist upon, he said. The DPP hopes for peace in the cross straits, but it must avoid over-dependence on China and maintain a regional strategic balance said Chair Su. He cited examples from President Ma Ying-jeous administration which destabilized regional balance of power such as assisting certain groups of Taiwanese people go to the Diaoyutai Islands and proclaim sovereignty for China instead of Taiwan. Chair Su said that these actions obviously shook regional stability and affected many sides, especially embroiling the United States because it is a signator of the Treaty of Cooperation and Security with Japan. Chair Su said that with these problems, Taiwan is at a critical geographic location, and hence, it is bestowed with the responsibility in maintaining regional stability and avoid triggering any conflicts. Ambassador Hill said that Taiwan is not a instigator of problems in the Asia-Pacific Region, but rather, Taiwan would be the solution to the problem since it is a paradigm of liberty and democracy. Mr. Hill also said that Taiwan should be allowed more international space so that the Taiwanese people, especially the young people in Taiwan, can participate in global affairs and not sense feelings of isolation. Chair Su replied that just as Mr. Hill had said, he hoped that Taiwan can join the world as a family member and that Taiwanese youth will have a chance to enhance and maintain the values of liberty, democracy and human rights.
PAGE 5
DECEMBER 2012
PAGE 6
peace, stability, cooperation and development; in the same vein, the maps inclusion of two Taiwanese tourist sites also appears to go against Chinas declaration of softening its stance on cross-strait relations; Calling on ASEAN, China, and other claimant parties to hasten the adoption of the Code of Conduct (COC) in the South China Sea, and to be fully committed to its implementation once adopted; Urging all concerned countries to respect each others territorial sovereignty, exclusive economic zone and maritime domain, in conformity and in accordance with international law, specifically the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Seas (UNCLOS), and to refrain from actions which may become source of renewed tensions or conflicts; The Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats hereby expresses concern on Chinas inclusion of disputed or national territories in
DECEMBER 2012 the map imprinted on its new electronic passport; recognizes that the act may be construed as provocative by other Asian countries; and urging all concerned countries to respect each others territory and maritime jurisdiction, as defined by international law, in the spirit of peaceful, constructive and amicable settlement of disputes. More information can be found at: http://www.cald.org/site/resourc e.php?i=Resolutions
PAGE 7
DECEMBER 2012
PAGE 8
DECEMBER 2012
PAGE 9