Reconstructing Education April Issue Press

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2
RECONSTRUCTING EDUCATION
An organ in support of free and equitable education from KG to PG and in resistance to all forms of trade in education
Quarterly publication of All India Forum for Right to Education
InsIde
Manu, Macaulay & Manmohan WTO-GATS-Education & India Public versus Private Schools
edItorIal
2 4 9
PERSPECTIVES
AIF-RTE National Council Meeting AIF-RTE National Council Resolution Peoples Dialogue: Khairwada
REPORTS
Call Against Higher Education Bills Letter to Prime Minister
CAll
11 14 16 24
Finlands School Success
INTERNATIONAl COmmENTARY
21 23
The idea of structural adjustment in public sector that had begun to gain some currency in India about two decades ago was accompanied by another illusory panacea of all Indian problems, namely the argument of economic liberalization. In spite of states claims to champion the public good, these two together implied a shift from recognizing the state responsible for providing all basic necessities through an improvement and expansion of public system to principle acceptance and defense of the reliance on market forces as the only feasible alternative.
Response to AIFETO and Colombo Declaration Colombo Declaration High Court Stay on School Closures ORGANISATIONS DIARY
27 28 29 30
Members: Meher Engineer (Kolkata) Madhu Prasad (Delhi) Vikas Gupta (Delhi) Editor: Madhu Prasad (Delhi) Assistant Editor: Vikas Gupta (Delhi)
Convenor: V. N. Sharma (Ranchi)
Editorial Board
Notwithstanding many previous efforts, this shift in the political economy of education was most powerfully epitomized in the RTE Act (2009) and now the same trend is going to engulf the sphere of higher education as well if the bills on higher education lying before the Parliament are enacted. We are experiencing a historical juncture in the political economy of formal education as we are about to realize the full brunt of the above-sketched shift in the sphere of formal education.
Everything is being restructured as part of an all pervasive reform drive, but do we anywhere in the world see mass movements pressing for such changes? Is it not therefore obvious to believe that these changes in public system, health and education for instance, are imposed from above? This also stands corroborated by the extremely accelerated pace of such changes with characteristic arrogance and indifference to difference of opinion and dialogue. On the contrary, what we know in general; and what is also apparent from this issue of Reconstructing Education is that there are various movements, largely scattered so far, but genuine in intent that are making all possible efforts to oppose the very design of such so called reforms. This volume is an effort to put together a few such efforts with the expectation that from these initially not so united battles, an alternative in education will be established one day that responds to peoples needs and aspirations. The example of Finland included in this volume is an additional booster.
Editorial Assistance: Mohit Pandey (Hyderabad) Lokesh Malti Prakash (Bhopal) Design: Lokesh Malti Prakash (Bhopal)
E-mail: reconstructing.education@gmail.com
A-100, SAIL Satellite Township Ranchi 834004, Jharkhand Mob. : +91 9431102680 Tel. : +91 651-2441524 Contribution: ` 20/-
Dr. V.N. Sharma

Contact:
Reclaiming Knowledge, Reconstructing Education
Educate! Agitate! Organise!

and continue struggle for
Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 1
5/9/2012 5:52:51 PM
India is one society that has inherited one of the most iniquitous social structures that remained stubborn notwithstanding several socio-political movements including the freedom movement. Manu, the Brahmnical Hindu ideologue provided the framework and justification for not allowing all sections of the society, more so the labouring classes and women of all communities not having access to written word. This dictum survives through thousands of years after the written word had been invented by the human species. The language of the powerful, Sanskrit, through which they wrote and communicated was their exclusive prerogative. Hinduism perhaps is the only religion that believes that human beings were born unequal and prevents equal access to God, supposedly the creator of man and woman. The denial of access to formal learning not only divided and hierarchised the society, but provided scope and space for manipulation by the propertied and the powerful. This social arrangement continued all through the medieval and colonial period. It was during the colonial period the English language started replacing the Sanskrit and other local languages. After the first war of independence in 1857, Macaulay advocated the introduction of English language and held that it was the only way to create a support base for the colonial rule. He thought, rightly so, that the English educated Indians would be Indian in colour and English in belief and behaviour. It was again the upper castes who took advantage of their social position and linguistic skills monopolized the opportunities in civil service, legal profession, media, teaching and so on. The English language was as alien to the people as Sanskrit except that the Christian missionaries opened schools where the hitherto forbidden sections had an entry point. In fact they provided access to God though Church and formal learning though schools. This opening up made no qualitative difference to the basic structure of social relations, but created a class of people, as Macaulay believed, who were entrapped into colonial mind-set and continue to perpetuate it even after six decades of the so-called victory of anti-colonial freedom struggle.
PERSPECTIVES
Manu, Macaulay and ManMohan
particularly for girls. Education for all as an idea entered the freedom movement in the early part of the last century and picked up momentum and by 40s came to be accepted by the Congress party who resolved to universalise right to education within a decade after independence. Given the aspirations and promise of the freedom movement it ought to have been incorporated in the fundamental rights chapter but on the grounds of resources and Nations preparedness it was pushed into nonjusticiable directive principles of State policy.
The widespread mass unrest in India on various counts including the growing inequalities compelling the rulers to take some measures and Right to Education Act of 2009 is one such step which is supposed to have encoded the right to education as a fundamental right. While this step is important in letter, the spirit of the Act is not qualitatively different from Manu, Macaulay mindset. The Act should have straight away scraped all the private schools and gone for common school through neighbourhood schools, raising the standards of each school, at the same time, to that of central school. Instead the Act talks of private-public partnership which, in principle, concedes the continued presence of private schools at one level and accentuates the medium of instruction divide. It talks of 25% reservation of It was Phule and Savitribai Phule realising the seats to poorer children in corporate schools. One importance of role of education started schools, starts wondering how a fundamental right could
The silver lining immediately after independence was that whatever or wherever schools existed or newly opened they were all publicly funded common schools resembling the neighbourhood schools concept as all children living in the vicinity went to the same school and studied through their mother tongue as medium of instruction. The limitation was that there was no concerted effort to ensure that all children go to the school which resulted in an India that has the distinction of having the largest number of illiterates in the world. This policy, by and large, continued till 1985-86. There was a shift in the policy which instead of initiating measures to provide access and quality education to all children introduced the policy of multi-layered schools bringing in inequity and inequality that Manu and Macaulay did earlier.
5/9/2012 5:52:51 PM
be so dividing and discriminatory. This has led to a country-wide debate whether the right in this form can ever be treated and accepted as a fundamental right. The public-private partnership is a device of the neo-liberal model to plunder public resources for private profiteering. The corporate schools used to amassing of wealth challenged the Act in the Courts opposing the admission of poor children into their schools. Assuming that the Court in principle concedes, which is very unlikely, what happens to the other 75% of the poor children condemned to study in government schools which are poorly funded and qualitatively inferior. Is it not the time that the nation in one voice demands that all children of this country in the age group of 0-18 have equal access to quality education through common schools in neighbourhood schools? The scenario in higher education is equally pitiable. There are six to eight bills waiting for parliamentary ratification. Of all the bills the most Macaulian is the Foreign Universities Bill. Kapil Sibal addressing the last All India Vice Chancellors conference looked concerned about only two issues: the Foreign Universities Bill and introduction of semesterisation in Delhi university as if they are the only issues afflicting higher education. Of course, during the recent visit of Manmohan Singh to the USA, one of the items that came up in the discussion with Obama was opening up of higher education for foreign investment. The Prime Minister in his Independence day address to the nation from the Red Fort made a specific reference to the urgency of educational reforms. The saddest part of higher education is the pathetic conditions of State Universities. No state government, without exception, has any interest left in higher education as the sons and daughters of the ruling classes go for private medical, engineering, legal and other professional streams of education. The most prosperous are sending their children to foreign universities and are arguing that the craze can be met only by inviting foreign universities to the Indian soil. It is precisely this cause that led to serious cuts in grants, stopping recruitment of new staff and all forms of support of the state. In the same breath they also want to privatise accreditation, distance education, tribunalization of educational litigation, abolition of UGC and manning the new council for higher education with corporate representatives. The teaching fraternity lured by the 6th pay commission evinced no interest in the neo-liberal
3
assault on higher education.
It is the wake of these drastic changes in school and university education, the All India Forum for Right to Education held its national conference in Yusuf Meharelly centre near Mumbai. The forum draws its membership from socialists, Lohiaites, Gandhians, leftists, radicals and democratise. They are drawn from 16 states of India and are engaged in building a nationwide movement against these undemocratic, uncalled for, anti people reforms in education. It is time that spirit of freedom struggle is retrieved and we build a movement for an equitable, humane, fair and just society. The cause of education is one of the powerful weapons to realize this goal. This would invariably be a fight against Manu-Macaulay-Manmohan mind-set. The posterity may not forgive this generation of academia. These sections are bound to carry their own battle against unjust society with or without the support of the academia.
G. Haragopal Member, Presidium All India Forum for Right to Education
BCI strike against Higher Education and Research Bill, 2011

Upset with the plan of the Union HRD Ministry to regulate the legal education sector through the proposed Higher Education and Research Bill, 2011, the Bar Council of India (BCI) on Monday called a nationwide protest on January 20. Lekh Raj Sharma, chairman, Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana, said The Higher Education and Research Bill, 2011, proposes to take away the duties and functions entrusted to the BCI and state Bar Councils and it proposes to vest all these powers with a national commission constituting a few academicians. The Council strongly condemns the attempt of the HRD Ministry by which it has tried to encroach upon provisions of Advocates Act, 1961, with a view to use the functions and duties of elected bodies comprising more than 15 lakh advocates of the country.
5/9/2012 5:52:51 PM
Wto-Gats-educatIon & IndIa

World Trade Organization (WTO) was established on 1st January, 1995. Its present membership, as on 10 February 2011, is 153 countries including India. The WTO came into being as an enlargement of earlier General Agreement on Trade and Tariff (GATT). While GATT had a limited role in world economic affairs, WTO intends to cover whole economic activities of all member countries. Further, WTO intends to transform every human activity including education, culture as a tradable activity. General Agreement on Trade in Services - GATS is different from GATT and is one of the agreements under WTO regime along with GATT and deals with trade in services.
of trade negotiations over five decades. Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) is otherwise known widely. However, in this piece of write up, it is only attempted to elaborate on General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). We are interested in GATS because, trade in education comes under this particular agreement.
The countries of the world are classified as 1) Developed, 2) Developing and 3) Least Developed by WTO. One need not dispute this classification. The point of dispute is whether the WTO was formed for the benefit of all the three categories of countries or with imperialist motives? It is felt that the WTO was formed to serve the interest of developed countries; and that it is detrimental to the interest of the least developed nations. Developing countries like India joined the organization to make the possible best for its corporate houses in the changed international conditions. With the liquidation of parallel world socialist market, the developed capitalist countries could impose these enlarged agreements on least developed countries. The developing countries like India which used to benefit from both developed capitalist countries and socialist countries are now circumscribed to search for benefits in the unified world capitalist market. The class inequalities and social inequalities are aggravated due to different agreements under WTO regime in all countries for the last two decades. It is apprehended that these inequalities would further aggravate with expansion of WTO operations through DOHA round. WTO has got three Integrated Multilateral Agreements along with two Legal Instruments and two Plurilateral Agreements in its ambit. The integrated multilateral agreements are (1) General Agreement on Trade and Tariff (GATT-1994), (2) Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and (3) the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). GATT-1994 is an expanded version of GATT-1947 through many a round
GATS & EDUCATION As is said earlier General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) is one of the multilateral integral agreements under WTO regime. 161 services are recognized as tradable services by GATS Council. Education is also considered a tradable service! Now it is officially talked as Trade in Education Services. As GATS is one of the integral multilateral agreements of WTO, all member countries of WTO are bound to GATS. However, this agreement can not be operationalised in a country until the country submits its commitment schedules service wise and sector wise to Council of Trade in Services. Different countries made commitments in different service sectors before year 2000AD and the agreement is under operation to that extent. The July (2004) package of WTO sought wide spread commitments from member countries. For this purpose, negotiations are taking place among the member countries as a part of Doha Round of Negotiations. As is known widely, the Doha round trade negotiations are yet to be concluded. Sectors and modes of Trade: According to the central product classification which is followed by GATS every service is divided into several sub-sectors. GATS recognized five sub-sectors in education service: 1) Primary education, 2) Secondary education, 3) Higher Education, 4) Adult Education and 5) Other education.
So also GATS recognize four modes of trade in services. With respect to education service the modes are as follows:

Mode 1 - Cross border supply: In which neither the student (consumer) nor the teacher/ institute (supplier) move from their respective countries. This mode is actually a mode of correspondence
5/9/2012 5:52:51 PM
Mode 2 - Consumption Abroad: Under this mode, the student (Consumer) move from his country to a foreign country (supplier) to receive education (the service). The student (consumer) pays the service charges to the institute (supplier). Mode 3 - Commercial Presence: Under this mode, educational institutions of a country (suppliers) establish their branches in another country, i.e. make their commercial presence in another country to provide education. Academic community of India has genuine apprehensions on this mode. It is apprehended that the coming of foreign universities to India (under this mode) is detrimental to Indian universities and to the students of poor and middle class families. Further, allowing foreign educational institutions would be detrimental to cultural diversity of the country where the strength of India lies and which is the core of our sovereignty. The imposition of foreign educational standards would lead to the so called standardization of education stifling the space for diversity. The utilitarian approach to educational and cultural aspects of life, which will be prompted by trade in education would lead to desocialisation of education both in access and content. Entry of foreign Universities creates a need for comparative quality assessment between foreign and domestic Universities and the actual problem lies in identifying and applying a yardstick for such an assessment. It is apprehended that in the given circumstances, such yardsticks would be essentially western and because of their alien nature would thereby exclude the indigenous knowledges.
education. In the present scenario it is an e-education. The student (consumer) pays the service charges to the institute (supplier).
Offers and Commitments: According to the present scheme of negotiations, every country can make requests to all or few of other WTO member countries to open up their respective markets in all or few listed services for commercial activities. It is natural that every country also receives such requests from other countries. A country, in response to the received requests, can make initial offers on opening up its services market. It is not obligatory for a member country to open its market in all services. Even, within a service, a country can be selective sector wise and mode wise in opening its market. The member countries, through mutual bargain in special sessions of ministerial meetings of the council of Trade in Services (already established under WTO), would finalize the offers of different countries. In this mutual bargain, member countries may withdraw or modify some offers which they have made earlier. When, an agreement is arrived at, the offers become commitments on the part of the respective countries. As is said earlier, negotiations in services to expand trade in services are a part of Doha Round which is yet to be concluded The point here, to be noted is that while every country has got a choice either to allow or not to allow foreign traders in its Education Service (for that matter in any service), it has also got the choice to be selective both in sector-wise and mode wise dimensions. Actually, both the requests and initial offers and ultimately commitments are made in sector wise and mode wise dimensions. However, the said choice is limited by the article 19 of the agreement which creates a pressure on member countries to progressively open their respective markets.
Mode 4 - Presence of Natural Person: Under this mode, teacher/trainer of a country moves to another country, stay there temporarily and market his / her service there - It is assumed that India has got good manpower resources (teachers in different disciplines) and can make the best use of this mode. The genuine apprehension, again, is that the best teachers would go to foreign lands. Students from poor and middle class families can neither go to foreign countries nor can join branches of foreign Universities in India because of high fee structure and would forego quality education.
5
India has submitted offers: In persuasion of Hong Kong Declaration made in 2005, India has submitted its offers in Higher Education Sub-sector to GATS Council. If Doha Round is completed successfully and if the offers are not withdrawn before conclusion of the round, the offers automatically become commitments on the part of India. But, commitment means a lot. The GATS has got many dangerous provisions. It is not possible to detail all the provisions here. Here, it is only attempted to give a brief note of few provisions and their possible affect on Indian education system. mFN Status: According to the Most Favored
5/9/2012 5:52:51 PM
Nation provision; each member country has to consider each other member country to be Most Favored Nation. All member countries are to be treated on par. It is not possible that we open market to South Africa and not to US. When a country opens its market in a particular service, it is opening it to all member countries (Favor one, favor all). Though, some exceptions are there, they would be handy only to developed countries. This provision becomes a fetter to the cooperation between developing and under developed countries. They can not make separate agreements in their mutual interest. National Treatment: According to
provision all foreign providers are to be treated on par with domestic providers. Analysts of the trade relations are apprehensive of this provision. They are of the opinion that it can mean even equal patronage to foreign providers on par with domestic private providers in the areas of subsidies with respect to land, roads, power water, tax exemption and reimbursement. Say, if some minority private institutions are supported by government in one or other form, there is every possibility that same support would be demanded by the foreign providers. Otherwise it can be construed as discrimination between domestic and foreign providers. The national government this would have no right to help the institutions of its own people! WTO will rule the roost.
G o v e r n m e n t Procurement: Supply of a service by government to its people is termed as Government Procurement and the same is provided for in GATS. There is no problem if a government college is not collecting any fees from students. But, if a government college is collecting some fee from the students, it is widely apprehended, again, that such government college can be construed as a private provider by GATS (articles in Journal of Critical Educational Policy Studies-JCEPS, 2005). The clause national treatment comes into picture immediately if the fee collecting Government College is construed as a private provider even though the fee is nominal and the college is essentially providing free
Neoliberal reforms in education has fueled students unrest across the globe. This poster is from Bangladesh published to mobilize support against commercialisation of education.

5/9/2012 5:52:52 PM
education. In a government college, education is essentially provided free of cost. Even the college collects some fee from the students that is only spent on contingent items. The main financial support comes from government. But, if the college is considered as a private provider by GATS rules for collecting some fee from the students, the support given to the college by the government can be considered as a discrimination against other private providers. If the apprehension proves to be real, the government either will have to provide same facilities which it provides to its own colleges to all domestic and foreign private providers (educational institutions) providing same courses of study or to completely withdraw support to the public institutions. We know our government may ultimately do a mix of it through PPP benefiting domestic and foreign private providers. The support extended to government colleges will be gradually decreased and they will be asked to become self reliant by increasing fee to be collected from the students and private colleges will be increasingly provided with government subsidies and reimbursements. Ultimately, public and private; domestic and foreign all institutes will be treated on par! Is not this process under way? The ground is under preparation for implementation of GATS. Sam Pitrodas national commission report on higher education is very close to GATS ideology. Even, Prof. Yash Pal report also attends essential needs of GATS. The result will be that even the government colleges will also be transformed as commercial ones.
Transparency Clause: Transparency is one of the provisions of the GATS. The Right To Information Act is not brought in the interest of people as many activists believe it so. It has come as one of the compliances with GATS. Multinational corporations require that all information is available to them. They want to know the position of a file and even the comments made on it by different officials. They want that bureaucracy do not come in its way. They want a legislation to empower them to know necessary information from government offices. There shall be legislation, they said. There is legislation! We find this RTI is enacted in many a countries and neo-liberal NGOs lobbied for it everywhere. The point is that the corporate houses are opposed to corruption at execution level. They prefer corruption at policy level. The corporate houses prefer to bribe policy makers and get a deregulating Act passed in their favor rather than bribing officers at all tables to bypass regulations. The Right To Education Act is an example of the sort. It clearly allows the private providers to increase fee to be collected from the Domestic Regulation: Domestic regulations students as they like it. Now, the private operators are to be gradually changed to trade friendly and need not give bribe to D.E.Os in districts to allow global trade friendly regimes. A sub-committee them to increase fee. is appointed under the aegis of Council for Trade in Services (GATS Council) to prepare reports on Independent Regulatory Authorities regular basis on rules and regulations of trade (IRAs): In the recent times, we find Independent in different countries. These reports lead to Regulatory Authorities (IRAs) are established in reforms in different countries. The Trade Policy many a service sectors. We have IRA for Power, IRA Review Mechanism (TPRM), one of the legal for Insurance and IRAs for many other services. instruments under GATS yearly review the trade Sam Petroda and unfortunately Prof. Yash Pal policies of different countries and suggest the also suggested one IRA for Higher Education. Sam countries to change their respective policies. This Petroda, Chairperson for Knowledge Commission, regulation of domestic policies may tantamount suggested in his report (November, 2006) on to the infringement on freedom of the nations in Higher Education to the government to establish formulation of their respective public policies. an Independent Regulatory Authority of Higher In all possibility, the public policy of member Education (IRA for Higher Education) to regulate countries would be controlled by WTO regime. higher education. Prof. Yash Pal, in his report on Developing and under developed countries would Renovation and Rejuvenation of Higher Education fall victim to this provision more. The officials of (2008) suggested the government to establish
7 RECONSTRUCTING EDUCATION
above said TPRM officially meet the ministers and secretaries of HRD ministry on yearly basis. They enquire every year about the so called reforms in education. Kapil Sibal is accountable to TPRM officials more than to people of India. So, he is turning every stone to pass the Higher Education Bills. This domestic regulation by WTO and its organs can lead to infringement on sovereignty of the member countries, more particularly the developing and underdeveloped countries.

5/9/2012 5:52:52 PM
an overarching body National Commission for Higher Education and Research by abolishing or subsuming all India educational authorities working in different domains of education like UGC, AICTE, NCTE, MCI, BCI and so on and so forth. Both the Knowledge Commission and Prof. Yash Pal Committee have recommended for an independent regulatory body as a centre of power. These IRAs can only be understood as a compliance with Additional Commitments provision under GATS. These IRAs are established only to keep the representative governments away from decision making.
National Commission for Higher Education and Research (NCHER): A Bill is introduced in the Parliament in December, 2011 on the basis of recommendations of Prof. Yash Pal Committee to enable the government to establish a National Commission for Higher Education and Research (NCHER). This Bill establishes an Independent Regulatory Authority, as elaborated earlier, in higher education in the name of NCHER. The proposed NCHER concentrates power in its hands relating to different domains of education and research. Again, this NCHER disarms state governments in taking appropriate decisions in the field of higher education affecting balance of power between states and centre. The IRAs working in different fields and NCHER which is to be established to regulate higher education would not be accountable to the people of the country in any form. This bypassing of legislative and executive processes would prove detrimental to the institutional democracy. The established IRAs in different services and the NCHER which is to be established in the field of education will be independent from public pressure and regulate education system in favor of domestic and foreign capital. CAll Of THE HOUR Government of India, as is said earlier, has already submitted its offers to GATS Council with respect to higher education. The offers are submitted in all of the four modes as elaborated earlier. It means, that India has agreed to consider education a tradable service. Further, it means that India has agreed for a global trade in education without any barriers. This agreement is not like any bilateral agreement between two interested countries that can easily be reviewed; it is a multilateral agreement between all member
countries. The provisions of the GATS would only prove that the withdrawal of commitments would be costlier than continuation. So, the commitments are almost irrevocable. WTO/GATS regime reduces education into a commodity and student into a consumer in clear cut legal terms and of course, in objective reality. When education is reduced to a commodity, not only that poor and disadvantaged will be denied of it even, those who get it will not get it worth the name. If one is opposed to trade in education or if one is at least opposed to global trade in education one should demand immediate withdrawal of the offers given to GATS Council of WTO in higher education sector by Government of India. The first priority for any education loving organization or person is to oppose encroachment of WTO-GATS on Indian education system.
Ramesh Patnaik Organizing Secretary All India Forum for Right to Education
8
5/9/2012 5:52:52 PM
Meiji restoration have achieved almost universal literacy by the end of 19th century, the goal is still eluding us. There are still pockets of high levels of illiteracy (around 80%}, while the 2011 census has estimated an average literacy of 75 percent for the country as a whole. But, illiteracy in rural areas is still a problem due to lack of schooling. It is not difficult to identify the groups and we need not spend millions on research to find out the reasons. This possibly could be attributed to our cultural ethos that invokes education as a prerogative of men and for a chosen few. This characteristic perhaps unconsciously guides our policy makers. Therefore, we cannot find fault with some of our gurus and corporate Babas reflecting the popular sentiment. In this context, we can find Andhra Pradesh as a unique state where the dichotomy of large number of higher educational institutions simultaneously flourish with one of the lowest levels of literacy (lower than Odisha} in the country. It never pricked the conscience of policy makers and the politicians.The gap is widening due to the education market created by the policies of the government that purport to slam such tendencies particularly in elementary education. The hullabaloo of public or government school and private school is due to the well The apathy and indifference in implementing entrenched involvement of the private corporate the constitutional directive of providing free and sector in school education. Naturally, they would compulsory education during the last five decades find ways to undermine the government schools after independence has compelled the government like the statements made by some Babas in whom to bring the RTE in 2009. The rules are prepared they have invested to create a brand value. The and individual states are asked to produce rules sentiment that government or public schools for the implementation of the Act. The central produce Naxlites would make the parents even in government has made budget provision for the rural areas to withdraw their children from such RTE through Sarva Siksha Abhiyan with a provision schools. This would enable the private corporate of not less than Rs 20000 crores in each budget. sector (they have already produced a document on In fact, policy makers have delayed the RTE for business possibilities in education) to enlarge its decades quoting that it would be difficult for the tentacles. government to find funds for its execution. Now funds are available yet, the allocated money for Nowhere in the developed countries including SSA seem to have not been fully utilized, if spent the UK, USA and the OECD, is primary education they are stories of embezzlement. What does it left to the private sector. In the USA schooling is really indicate? compulsory. The state through local governments and educational districts manages institutions We may for a moment get back to the cultural with necessary funding. It is reported that the history of this country to understand the low levels enrollment in pure private and non-profit schools of literacy and underdevelopment. While most of in capitalist America comes to around 10 percent. the East Asian countries including Japan through Even these schools are supposed to follow certain The recent controversy on the role of government schools (public school) in generating Naxlites versus the Private Schools producing Swayam Sevaks is an interesting issue on which there seem to be little discussion. Most of the private schools in India are strangely called as public schools. It is a misnomer. However, the debate on public education is as old age as the movement for self respect and modernization. Mahatma Phuley who is credited for the backward classes movement was the first in modern India to apprise the British about the parochial nature of English education in India. In his memorandum (reproduced in one of my books) to the Hunter Commission in 1882, Phuley questioned the rationale in restricting public education to dvijas and denying the same to shudra and atishudra farmers who had contributed to the education of others through special cess. School education became public in modern India after the implementation of the recommendations of Hunter Commission. Thus, the debate on public and private schools is not a new occurrence and has always been there to reflect a deep rooted prejudice against the universalisation of education in India.
9 RECONSTRUCTING EDUCATION
dIscourse on PublIc versus PrIvate schools

5/9/2012 5:52:52 PM
standards laid down by the government as they are identified as denominational with church or other such groups. The situation in India particularly after the debates on compulsory primary education and Art 45 and now the RTE has become trivial. The enrolment in private schools now stands at 25 percent of the total in elementary sector. This is not an urban phenomenon. The Economic Survey 2012 mentions that enrolments in the private primary schools in rural areas range between 30 to 50 percent of the total. This is preceded by the fall in standards where 48 to 54 percent of students in Fifth standard cannot read a text book of Second standard. In the meanwhile, it is alleged that some courts have interpreted the 25 percent reservation of seats as per RTE in corporate schools include economically weaker sections. Now, it is easy for anyone to get a certificate to admit their children in corporate schools and would get the assistance from the government. The private schools are allowed to collect their dues. This has widened the net of private corporate schools both in urban and in the rural areas as the fees would be paid by government. The policy makers would soon come out with a report saying that they have accomplished the universal (MDG) target like perhaps the poverty figures?
everybody. This has not been implemented and now all kinds of deviations with the sole aim of creating profitable investment opportunities in Education sector are being recommended by those who do not have adequate knowledge about our society and education.

It is disheartening to find that the situation in the school education which is supposed to produce secular and responsible citizens is totally out of focus of both the parents and the intellectuals. Most of those who are popular in public life today including the Nobel laureates were educated through the so called panchayat or municipal school. They have learnt from each other group and appreciated the diversity of the country. In fact one of my colleagues, an enlightened Muslim lady has informed me that most of the Madarasas are run in areas that are ghettos without proper infrastructure, teachers and aid from government. I am told they are run with little support from the community sometimes by the jealous so called fundamentalists as they are ones who are coming to the rescue of the poor Muslims. Therefore, the Hindus do not have an opportunity to know how they look like and what they think. It is also true about the other community. Some of the tensions in our society are due to the fact that we do not know enough about our own people due to sectarian schooling. Realizing the cultural diversity of the country, the Kothari commission on Education in 1966 recommended a common school for
India is not USA and not even Pakistan in terms of its diversity and plurality. It is exactly for this reason the British had introduced a secular grant-in- aid code for educational institutions to discourage denominational and communal orientation in education. The Indian republic stands for a secular state and the education system should comply with it through a uniform curriculum and goals. It was found in a study conducted by us about three decades ago that our education system is class oriented. A Municipal or Panchayat school is for the wretched of the earth, the so called Public school or convent for the rich and the aided school for the middle classes. The students would perhaps never meet and share the sublime dreams of our founding fathers who wished that India should emerge one day as a single Nation and not multitudes of classes and nations through schools that promote parochialism and discordant culture.
K.S. Chalam Former Vice-Chancellor, Dravidian University Ex-member, Union Public Service Commission chalamks@hotmail.com
Our Publication
NEO-LIBERAL ASSAULT ON HIGHER EDUCATION An Agenda for Putting India on Sale Compilation & Editing: Dr. Anil Sadgopal
Price: ` 20/-
Available at: E- 8/29, Sahkar Nagar, Bhopal 462039 Madhya Pradesh Email: aifrte.secretariat@gmail.com Tel. : +91 040-2330-5266 Mob. : +91 9440980396
10
5/9/2012 5:52:52 PM
aIF-rte natIonal councIl MeetInG a rePort

The National Council meeting of the All India Forum for Right to Education was held from 9th to 11th December, 2012 at Yusuf Meherally Centre, Tara Village of Rayagad District, Maharashtra. 26 organizations from 18 states sent total 81 representatives to the National Council Meeting. The National Council meeting were preceded by a meeting of the National Executive. all corners of the country were placed before the council by the central AIF-RTE and its member organizations. All delegates were enthused to learn about the struggles of the people in other regions and states. The report on the activities of AIFRTE for the period 25th Feb, 2010 to 9th Dec, 2011 was presented by the Organising Secretary Sh. Ramesh Patnaik. The National Council of AIF-RTE had met on 25th of February, 2010 at Rajendra Bhavan, New Delhi, the day after the historic March to Parliament organised by AIF-RTE against the anti-people Right to Education Act, 2009 and the proposed Bills in higher education, which have now been introduced in Parliament. They are intended to òpen up the higher education sector for domestic and foreign trade. The massive rally demanded introduction of Common School System and a Public Funded Education System from KG to PG. The National Executive organized many programmes of protest, in collaboration with its member organizations, covering as many as about hundred districts throughout the country against commercialization of education and for mobilizing public opinion in favor of Common School System based on Neighborhood Schools and an all-India public-funded Education System from KG to PG.
REPORTS
The delegates of the National Council meeting were welcomed by Dr. G.G. Parikh, well known Socialist leader and moral head of the Yusuf Meherally Centre. The veteran leader said that the Right to Education is a subject very close to his heart and also part and parcel of the agenda of the Yusuf Meherally Centre. He expressed his strong belief that AIF-RTE is a committed organization and would take the peoples struggle for right to education to its logical end. On this occasion, two News Letters Reconstructing Education and Talim Ki Ladai of All India Forum for Right to Education were released by Dr. Anand Teltumbde (IIT, Kharagpur). This was followed by presentations on pertinent issues of education. Building the foundation for subsequent discussions, Prof. K. Chakradhara Rao underlined the crises of capitalist economy from World WarI onwards. Dr. Anand Teltumbde and Prof. G. Haragopal critically underlined the implications of the assault of neoliberal policies for Indian education system. Prof. Anil Sadgopal presented the vision of Common School System. Ms. Simantini Dhuru and Prince Gajendra Babu spoke on problems of and new attacks on school education, Dr. Vikas Gupta and Dr. Rajendra Kumbhar spoke on commercialization and communalization of higher education. Ms. Madhu Prasad spoke on the NDA governments òffer in 2000 to include higher education sector under World Trade Organization regulations and its negative effects on the autonomy of education and sovereignty of the nation. Sh. Sunil presented issues of struggle in the field of education. Sh. Ramesh Patnaik presented a list of demands covering pre-primary to higher education. Sh. Surjit Thokchom drew the attention of the house to questions of diversity in our conception of education. BRIEF OVERVIEW OF mOBIlIzATIONS AND ACTIVITIES
11
On 1st April, 2010 when the Central Government implemented the farcical Right to Education Act, 2009, AIFRTE gave a call for observing a Black Day. Our member organisations the black day programme in about 100 districts. We opposed this Act from the stage of Bill itself because it institutionalizes multi-track discriminatory school education against the directives of the Constitution. It promotes commercialization of education and allows private managements to increase fees as they wish. It further provides for the neo-liberal scheme of Public Private Partnership in the form of fee reimbursement to siphon the public funds to private agencies. AIFRTE organised a Dharna at Sashtri Bhawan on 26th of July, 2010 against the Higher Education Bills (Foreign Educational Institutions Bill, Educational Tribunals Bill, National Accreditation Authority Bill and National Council for Higher
Very encouraging reports of struggles from

5/9/2012 5:52:52 PM
Education and Research Bill). A delegation of AIFRTE met the Standing Committee on Education, Ministry of Human Resources Development and submitted a memorandum in opposition to these anti people Bills.
On 18th and 19th of February, 2011, delegations of AIFRTE met leaders of different political parties in Delhi to sensitize political opinion against the nefarious Bills and the offer still pending before A National Seminar on Higher Education, World Trade Organisation. Leaders of CPI, CPI(M) organized by Delhi Siksha Adhikar Manch, and the RSP said that they were trying their level was held in Delhi on 22nd August, 2010. best to mount opposition against higher education Representatives of many rogressive teachers and bills even with their meager strength in the students organizations participated in the seminar. Parliament. We appealed to them to directly take The keynote address was delivered by noted up campaigns among the people. economist Prof. Prabhat Patnaik. The seminar exposed thoroughly the Bills pertaining to Higher A delegation of AIF-RTE met Sh.Sharad Yadav, Education and showed how they are a preparation the leader of Janata Dal (United) who gave a for inclusion of higher education sector in the patient hearing to our case but has not been global market as a tradeable commodity to be able do anything against these Bills till date. A governed by WTO regime. delegation headed by Prof. Anil Sadgopal also met Sh. Rahul Gandhi, General Secretary, AICC. Akhila Bharat Samajwadi Adhyapak Sabha Members explained the dangerous consequences (ABSAS), a member organization of AIFRTE gave of commercialization of education to the polity and a call to observe Satyagraha from 28th November to society in the long run. They appealed to him to (the death Anniversary of Mahatma Jyoti Rao Phule) get the party to propose that government initiate a to 6th December, 2010 (The death anniversary nationwide public debate on proposed educational of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar). The presidium of AIFRTE reforms as was done in the case of the GM foods called its other member organizations to actively issue AIFRTE could not get an appointment with observe the Satyagraha. AIFRTEs call included BJP leaders. demands for public-funded education system at all levels along with the demand for Common School All India Students Association (AISA), a System raised by ABSAS. It was a big success as member organization, and AIF-RTE organized a many member organizations in different areas Shiksha Jansansad at Parliament Street against participated actively. In many a places, our activists the nefarious Higher Education Bills. Hundreds courted arrest. of students and youth participated in the day long programme held on 21st of February, 2011. A Workshop on Education and Language was AISA, reportedly organized similar programmes at conducted by AIFRTE on 2nd and 3rd January, different levels before this central programme. 2011 at Itarsi (Madhya Pradesh). The workshop was hosted by Siksha Adhikar Manch, District, Delhi Siksha Adhikar Manch (DSAM) took many Hoshangabad (Madhya Pradesh). There was activities in Delhi against different anti people a serious discussion on the question of Multi- policies of the central government as it is located linguality and issues relating to education in in the capital. Fortunately, we have a number of the mother tongue. The workshop issued a call active comrades, member organizations and other proposing further debate on multi-linguality organizations in Delhi who raise our banner on and suggested that united struggles be launched almost all important issues ranging from school against the sinister design of the ruling classes education to higher education, including the threat to hinder the free development of Indias many posed to any democratization of education by the languages. sinister designs of the Hindutva forces. An online petition was initiated on 25th of January, 2011 against the nefarious Bills related to Higher Education. A face to face signature campaign and a post card campaign were initiated by AIFRTE. In Andhra Pradesh the card campaign was taken up in almost all districts. Our organizations in Delhi, Mumbai, Gujarat also took some initiative
in this programme.
Andhra Pradesh Save Education Committee (APSEC) is working among the government school teachers through its member organizations. While taking up struggles on the service related problems of teachers APSEC is also striving to mobilize common teachers for the demands of children, demands related to conditions of schools
12
5/9/2012 5:52:53 PM
includes Common School System. We demand establishment of an education system which is built on democratic, secular, egalitarian and socialist values enshrined in our constitution. A democratic education system excludes all inequalities and includes all diversities. We, on behalf of All Tamilnadu State Platform for Common School India Forum for Right to Education, envision an System (TNSPCSS) is organizing the teachers education system which can promote pro-people and parents of private schools for their sectional national development, respond with sensitivity to demands,but it is also trying to mobilize the the peoples aspirations for equitable distribution parents and teachers for the cause of education, of resources, optimization of socio-cultural and knowledge-related diversity and securing civil and for Common School System. liberties and democratic rights, as guaranteed by School Development and Monitoring the Constitution. Committee Coordination Forum, Karnataka and AIF-RTE strives to build a nation-wide mass its fraternal organisation Prarambhik Shikshak Samiti (Karnataka) are trying to mobilize parents movement to achieve it. and teachers of government schools for the cause of Common School System. Committee for Equal The meet of the National Council was attended Fundamental Right to Education, Mumbai, which by persons with ideologies ranging from is working in different sections of the masses Ambedkarites, different shades of Communists, on educational problems has recently taken up Gandhites and different shades of Lohiaites two issues which relate them with teachers, and Socialists with a great resolve to fight parents and students. They are fighting against commercialization and communalization of the Maharashtra Governments withdrawal of aid education and to achieve a democratic education to Marathi medium schools and demanding fee system. It was an event where people of different reimbursement to the BC students in unaided democratic ideologies exchanged their ideas private schools. They are trying to mobilize these and appreciated strengths in each other. The effected sections for wider demands of education National Council stood united on behalf of the All and Common School System. India Forum for Right to Education to condemn Bihar Arajpatrit Prarambhik Shikshak Sangh is anti-people educational policies of the state and taking up the problems of contract teachers along expressed its strong will to work for the cause with the problems of the regular teachers. They of a democratic, secular, egalitarian, just and are trying to sensitize the regular teachers on the enlightened education system. problems of contract teachers and on the problems The Committee for the Fundamental and Equal of education system as such. Right to Education (a member organization of Adivasi Ekta Parishad, Gujarat is working AIFRTE) took this occasion as an opportunity and among the tribal people in Gujarat and building organized a public meeting. Crisis of Education and struggles on their legitimate demands. They are Struggle for Social Justice was the banner. It was trying to draw the masses of the tribal people for argued in the meeting. The public meeting, held at Vanmali Hall, Dadar (west), Mumbai, carrying the cause of education. forward the ideas and spirit of the National Council Of course, here, it is not intended to give a complete strongly expressed the view that equal education report of the activities of member organizations. opportunity can protect our democracy . Vetaran However, the exemplary and diversified activities freedom fighter Dr. G.G. Parikh presided over of different member organizations are part and the meeting and Prof. Anil Sadgopal, Ms. Madhu parcel of the all India struggle for Common School Prasad, Adv. Gayatri Singh, Sh. Vivek Korde and Ms. System and a democratic education system. Simantini Dhuru spoke on the occasion. and concerning the education system as a whole. It is a particular experiment where teachers of government schools are being mobilized for the cause of education and for common school system with some success. All India Forum for Right to Education and its member organisations stand firmly against commercialization and communalization of education. We strive for education for all, equal education for all and public funded education system at all levels from K.G to P.G which A press conference was held on 12th of December, 2011 at Marathi Patrakar Bhavan in Mumbai to announce the resolutions passed by the National Council and announced the action programmes taken up in the National Council.
13

5/9/2012 5:52:53 PM
India has a long and ancient history of a deep-rooted exclusionary and discriminatory socio-religious structure. The oppressive hierarchy and violence of the caste system has dominated all aspects of life and deprived the vast majority of the Indian people from access to the benefits of their own labour and the fruits of the rich resources of the land. In the context of sharp class divisions, this framework facilitated and aggravated other forms of oppression communal, gender, disability, and the dispossession of tribes and other marginalized communities. The long struggle against the brutal exploitation of British colonialism eventually resulted in the spread of a wide-ranging freedom movement. Demands of all sections of the people were raised in the course of the struggle leading to the overthrow of British rule and the establishment of a constitutional republic which enshrined values of equality and non-discriminatory rights and opportunities as the basis of the future development of the country.
Resolution of the National Council, AIf-RTE
The role of education was conceived as an essential component in the struggle for achieving this goal and hence universalization of free and compulsory education, to be achieved by 1960, was included in the Directive Principles of the Constitution. But today, despite sustained protest and critique, we find that a stunted, multi-track and discriminatory scheme of education, which denies the right of all children to get education of quality, has been legitimized in the form of The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009. Embedded in the limiting framework of the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act 2002, which denied rights of children under six years to early childhood care and preprimary education, and made education the only fundamental right to be exercised as the State may, by law, determine, the RTE Act 2009, has given legitimacy to neo-liberal multi-track and non-formal education schemes already which had been initiated in the 1990s under World Bank-IMFs Stuctural Adjustment conditionalities. Motivated by the desire to promote a market in education and to dismantle the existing structure of government schools, which alone could have formed the basis of quality education for all, this approach has not only led to rapid deterioration of the approximately 12 lakh government schools, except for the special categories of central and model schools, but has also paved the way for a mushrooming growth of private schools and growing commercialization of education. The passage of the RTE Act has only accelerated this process. Freeing private schools from state regulation, the 2009 Act has led to an alarming rise in fees and yet allowed for transfer of public funds to such institutions through development grants and so-called re-imbursement for admitting 25% EWS pupils. This scheme, due to the medias almost exclusive focus, has diverted attention from the States abdication of its own constitutional obligation to provide free and compulsory education of equitable quality for all. Therefore, we demand that the Union government,
1. Repeal RTE Act 2009 and hold public hearings at district levels to draft a new Bill on the egalitarian principles of the Common Neighbourhood School System which draws in all children including the disabled; 2. Amend the Constitution to undo the negative impact of 86th Amendment to ensure free and compulsory education to all from the stage of early childhood care and pre-primary right up to Class XII; 3. Impose a complete ban on child labour; 4. Provide constitutionally for adequate funding, and ban privatization and commercialization of education, including all forms of Private Public Partnership (PPP). Until these steps are taken, we further demand that 1. No closure or merger of government schools should be permitted. 2. School faculty and auxiliary staff of all government schools should be adequately enhanced and teacher education and curricular reform should be undertaken to strengthen the system. 3. Necessary steps to adequately train para-teachers and other teaching personnel be immediately undertaken to allow for their regularization; 4. The trend of diverting public funds to private managements must be stopped forthwith. 5. Land and other physical assets of private managements that close educational institutions should be entirely accessed by the public system of education. HIGHER EDUCATION Neo-liberal reforms are being extended over the entire education system right up to higher education. Over the past decade successive governments have promoted policies that treat higher education as a private good and a tradeable commodity although the Constitution envisioned it as the primary vehicle for achieving social justice and equal opportunity. The NDA government commissioned the Ambani-Birla for the corporatization of higher education in 2000 and put higher education on the WTO agenda by offering it up for regulation under the General Agreement

14
5/9/2012 5:52:53 PM
of Trade in Services (GATS) regime. Since 2004 the UPA governments have failed to withdraw the offer even though completion of the DOHA Round trade negotiations would bring higher education under the GATS regime in perpetuity, affecting both the character of higher education and constituting a major threat to national sovereignty. In fact the Bills brought before Parliament by the present government, and those still on the anvil, are designed to facilitate this process, by creating a highly lucrative market, an estimated fifty billion dollars by 2015, in education for foreign and domestic capital. Instead of reforming the 500 universities and over 25,000 colleges in dire need of improvement, Governments present policy will sacrifice the future of lakhs of students enrolled in these institutions to aggressively privatize and commercialize education to benefit foreign and domestic investors. The Bills are undemocratic in content and restrict the freedoms of both students and faculty. Focussed on the need to promote and secure investment in the sector rather than enriching learning and research, they provide single-window entry points for education providers even as they homogenize education by imposing highly centralized governing mechanisms that disregard significant historical and regional diversities. The privately borne high costs of education will certainly lead to a decline in fundamental research and social critique but market-driven courses will be at a premium. Further, existing disparities in access and infrastructure across different sections and regions will be aggravated by the sharp decline in public funding. Why has no national debate preceded the offer to the WTO and the formulation and presentation of the current Bills which represent a radical reversal in national policy and perspective? The critical, transformational role of higher education plays a central role in strengthening civil society and democratic processes of governance. If it comes under the control of market forces and WTO strictures, the very idea of higher education as a social good will be severely undermined. THREAT TO DEmOCRATIC FREEDOmS An equally grave threat challenging the system of education in particular and democratic freedoms in society in general is the rise of right-wing vigilante-groups and reactionary fundamentalist, communal and fascist forces. These violent, anti-democratic forces are not only exploited by market forces but also succeed in instilling fear psychosis in democratic institutions (whether elected governments, administration, media, and even the judiciary), groups and individuals. Their actions are leading to a shrinking of that necessary democratic space for dissent, negotiation and consensus without which society can neither advance its knowledge systems, nor can it further the growth of transparent, participative and democratic forms of governance. The democratic movement must resist and counter these forces and expose their anti-people designs. We must also demand that the state and authorities at all levels perform their necessary function in acting swiftly and firmly against such forces. We must strongly condemn any failure to do so or expose all attempts to accomodate the actions of such forces for narrow political or social gains.
The need to uphold the banner of radical, democratic demands in the struggle for an egalitarian system of quality education which can only be realized through state-funded common neighbourhood schools that ensure access for every single child to a diverse and pluralist learning environment right up to university, requires to be highlighted by the AIF-RTE. The crisis of neo-liberalism is evident all over the world and protests are erupting everywhere. In India too, although some sections of the population are still under the illusion of benefits accruing from neo-liberal developmental strategies, the peoples anger is beginning to find expression and will only grow and spread. Alternative pro-people strategies and democratic ideals must be formulated and promoted to inform and galvanize the inevitable wave of protests which will rise in the future. FUTURE PROGRAmS 1. To observe an all India protest day on 9th February, 2012 (which was subsequently changed to 16th February, 2012) against the six higher education bills which are in different stages in parliament and which are aimed at thorough commercialization of higher education and opening up for foreign capital operations in the field of education. 2. To observe 1st April, 2012, the second anniversary of the anti-child, anti-education and anti-Constitutional socalled Right to Education Act, 2009, in order to seek its replacement by a new Act founded in the framework of Common School System based on Neighborhood Schools. 3. To organize a national convention against trade in education and for Common School System in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu Platform for Common School System will organize the programme) in month of June, 2012. The national Council of AIF-RTE held on 9-11 December 2011 adopted three programmes namely:
15

5/9/2012 5:52:53 PM
PeoPles dIaloGue on educatIon KhaIrWada

Jagaruk Shikshak Sangathan has been working continuously for resolving the problems of teachers, students and guardians in the Khairwada block of Udaipur district (in the Indian state of Rajasthan) for last five years. Its efforts has led to awakening of a new consciousness among the teachers of the area and as a result they are getting associated with the Sangathan on a regular basis. Many teacher associations are working in the area. Yet, Jagaruk Shikshak Sangathan has established its identity among teachers, students and guardians of the area by its thought and work.
Following the same thought and workprocess, Jagaruk Shikshak Sangathan, in its meeting during December 2011 decided that teachers and guardians need to understand the meaning of education, so that they can fathom the anti-people changes occurring in education and can resist the same as an organized collectivity. Thus the Jagaruk Shikshak Sangathan (hereafter called the Union) decided to invite the famous educationist, Dr. Anil Sadgopal, who has been fighting for the cause of Nai Talim all over the country. An organizing committee was constituted for the programme. Mr. Shantilal Damor was made the Coordinator/ Convener of this programme. Plans were made to disseminate the information about this programme among the government schools of the area using post-cards and to collect donations for the same by personally visiting each school. Many teachers and youth took on this responsibility very enthusiastically. This preparatory phase generated many new experiences which acted as a part of context-building exercise, which further developed an understanding for further work. In the end, 26th February was fixed as the date for the programme.
The venue for the programme was the playground of the Government Secondary School of Khairwada. Some detailed discussion on the venue is due here, as the lifeless, mute playground was also trying to tell its story while hosting the Peoples Dialogue. The open space did not look like a schools playground from any angle. Barring a stadium-like amphitheatrestairs on one side, the space did not display any qualities of being a playground or a schools playground meant for children. Probably the stadium was also seemed to be raising doubts on its existence, every now and then. It seemed to search for the possibility of its existence and the question which seemed to confront it was Am I really a stadium of a schools playground? This playground of the school situated on National Highway number 8 (NH8), seemed to merge with NH8 itself. On inquiry, it was found that there is a wall between the playground and the road, which is not visible now in many places. When it was difficult to even walk easily on the uneven and rocky surface of this so-called playground, one would tumble (or tremble?) even at the thought of playing on it. On one side of the playground, houses stood adjoining THE PROGRAmmE the wall, for which the side of the wall towards A Peoples Dialogue on Education was the playground was working as a dustbin and
organized by the Jagaruk Shikshak Sangathan on 26th February 2012 at Khairwada. Among the participants were more than two hundred men, women and children from many villages of Khairwada block, engaged in range of activities from learning to teaching and participating in the process of education directly or indirectly. Apart from them, Dr. Anil Sadgopal, Member, Presidium, All India Forum for Right to Education; Mr. Bhagchandra Kumawat, Vidya Bhawan Society, Udaipur; Social activists of Udaipur - Mr. Kishore Sant and Mr. D.S. Paliwal; Ms. Snehal Shah from Delhi; Amarendra Pandey, Asst. Professor of English at Gujarat Vidyapeeth, Dr. Vikram Singh Amarawat, Professor of History along with his four students Bharat, Ravindra, Heval and Nayan also participated in the programme.
16
5/9/2012 5:52:53 PM
dumping yard. The entrance of the playground, which opened towards the Highway, seemed to be serving as the dustbin for the whole of Khairwada. Some temporary huts were standing inside the playground itself in which people were staying. The playground was also being used for commercial purposes. An open godown of bamboo and bricks could be seen. Many small shops were built along the wall of the playground. Summing up, this playground was a multi-purpose utility/space where possibilities existed for many works other than play and these works were being done as well. The programme schedule was like a Public Hearing or Jan Sunavayi. The first session of this two-session programme was for questions and issues to be raised, while the second session was for the Jurys report. The programme started without any formalities at 12.00 noon, an hour past the scheduled time. The stage was made at ground level and the members of the jury sat on the ground. The programme began with a tribal song. Then, Mr. Kantilal Asodaa of Jagaruk Shikshak Sangathan described how he was inspired by an article, which he read while travelling in a bus going to his village from Udaipur two years back, on the Right to Education Act, written by Anil Sadgopal; and how the Peoples Dialogue became possible now only due to that inspiration. Mr. D.S. Paliwal threw light on the need for such a Peoples Dialogue on Education and informed about its form. Mr. Paliwal elaborated on the inequality, corruption and discrimination pervading the society and Governments suspicious role in it. He clarified that the programme was a Public Hearing (Jan Sunavayi), in which a four-member jury would hear the peoples problems related to current education and would then suggest ways of resolving these problems. The Jan Sunavayi then began. A four-member jury was constituted, which included Dr. Anil Sadgopal, Ms. Snehal Shah, Amarendra Pandey and Dr. Vikram Singh Amarawat.
Khairwada among others, participated in the Jan Sunavayi. Various types of ideological and practical questions related to the education system were put to the Jury, by the children staying in tribal hostel, students of ITI (Industrial Technical Institute?), college-going girls, laborer guardians, teachers of government and private schools.
17
The second session of the Jan Sunavayi started and in the beginning, Dr. Vikram Singh Amarawat put forth all the questions that were raised in the first session in a concise form and presented their categorization based on the nature of the issues. Various questions were raised in varied manner, from different directions, covering various aspects. The questions were so many and of such nature, that it was beyond the capacity of the jury to suggest the complete and final responses to all of them. This was indicated by Dr. Sadgopal urging that if the original issues are faced by the people of Khairwada then the final solution can only come from the people of Khairwada. The jury can give its own contribution and indicate/ Students of far-flung villages of Khairwada guide the path, but the finally, it is the people block, staying and studying in hostel/ of Khairwada, who have to come out with an government residential schools, students of appropriate and sustainable solution. other government schools, parents of schoolFirst of all, Mr. Dhularam, a senior social activist going children, representatives of various communities and Unions, Social activists of of Khairwada had mentioned many problems
It was decided that first the people of Khairwada would raise their questions, mention their problems, which the jury would write down and later, the jury would divide the questions into various categories and present their thoughts on the same. The questions started raining. For almost two hours, questions were raised one after the other. Sometimes, in order to further clarify the questions, the Jury discussed it with the person raising the question and elaborated upon the questions. It seemed that questions were many and the time too less. So after the decided time, the organizers closed the question-session and invited the jury to present its report. In a very short time, the jury compiled all the questions and temporarily classified them into various categories. It was decided that Prof. Vikram Singh Amarawat would initially present the questions to the floor in a compiled form and later Dr. Anil Sadgopal would discuss them in detail while presenting the opinion of the jury.

5/9/2012 5:52:53 PM
If there is compulsory education then why isnt there compulsory employment? Should we send our children to government schools or private schools? What is the politics behind the shortage of teachers? How to determine/ decide/ ensure future of orphan children? What arrangements can be there in 1. Fundamental or ideological issues/ issues education so that we can study as well as earn simultaneously? of principle/ theory, If the government can create the two2. Policy related issues, child constraints, then why can it not make it 3. Issues related to shortage, and 4. Issues related to corruption and wrong compulsory for government functionaries to enroll their children in government schools? methods. How can the parents who are laborers (dailyFUNDAmENTAl OR IDEOlOGICAl ISSUES/ wage earners working long-hours) can attend a Parent-Teacher Meeting? ISSUES OF PRINCIPlE/ THEORY of tribal culture and history of Khairwada and asked the floor why, even today, that history is not taught. He severely criticized the policies that alienate the tribals and ignore their history. The questions that had emerged from the floor were categorized into four categories based on their nature. These four categories (to which all the questions generally related) were as follows: What is the meaning of education? What is the difference between literate/ schooled and educated? Why are there contradictions between subject-matter of education and local culture? Why does a local student fall back in/cannot cope with todays competitive era? She/he cannot reach even a Navodaya school, why so? Why does a child of a laborer become only a laborer and one of a farmer only a farmer? Children of all government functionaries, officers, leaders study in private schools. Dont they trust their own (government-run) schools? Why are there hundreds of types of education? Why is the education of rich and poor so different? A laborer is paying Rs. 500 (separately in a government school) for mathematics tuition. What type of right to education is this? Can there be (or can it become) an education system, in which a tribal can become a scientist and a Dalit can become a literary icon? Now no student is going to fail from first to eighth, then what is the need of any teacher? Subjects cannot be studied in-depth in the semester system. What can be our role against privatization of education? What is that helplessness of parents/ what are the constraints on parents that make them not send their children to schools/ not educate their children?
POlICY RElATED ISSUES
As per the governments policy, how is a single teacher (how can a single teacher be expected to) going to teach five classes? The formalities to provide a scholarship amount of 5 or 6 (or 15) rupees take over 15 days of work (on part of the teacher). Why the policy of not failing any child upto class eight has been made at all? One has to teach class seven and eight simultaneously. The new course is of CBSE, which does not have any relation with the society-culture of the state. The new syllabus does not have grammar. Most of the teachers are busy with Mid-day Meals and other development schemes. Why is a child who is enrolled in an Anganwadi also enrolled in a school? What is the intention of the government behind 25% reservation under the Right to Education Act? Why can this reservation not be 50-60%? Why are the teachers made to works on tasks other than teaching? If there is shortage of teachers in the rural schools, why does the government not fulfill it? For how many years can a teacher stay in a village? The responsibility of Adolescent Girl Scheme is given to an Anganwadi worker is it appropriate?
18
5/9/2012 5:52:53 PM
It would be good if education is given in school instead of food. The work of providing food should be left to parents. There are educated and trained unemployed (persons), and yet teachers are made to work on other tasks. Why is there a shortage of teachers? How far is the semester system appropriate? How far is the Education Policy right and how far is it wrong? For how many days in a year does a school run? Teachers are busy with the Census, elections, animal census, polio etc. A childs name is not removed from the enrollment list even if a child remains absent or present, why so? While no training is provided on computer in I.T.I., no degree (diploma/certificate) is given without a certificate of computer training, so one (is asked to) has to bring a certificate from a private institute, for which two-three thousand rupees have to be spent. How far is this policy appropriate? The government puts pressure on female education and empowerment, but today, females are unemployed even after doing B.Ed. and M. Ed., then how would female education get encouraged? Government teachers do (private) tuitions, is there any law to stop them? Why is the teacher-recruitment process delayed? ISSUES RElATE TO SHORTAGE There is provision of providing books till class VIII, but no books are there. A single teacher has to teach five classes, there is shortage of teachers. There are 150 students in Physics, Chemistry and Biology and the teacher is only one-one (not clear is there one each or one for all?), who have to take care of theory and practical both. There is no laboratory in school till class Xth. There is shortage of facilities for girl education. There is shortage of a separate college for girls. There is shortage of teachers at every level. There is no arrangement whatsoever for water in the school for last many years.
There is no proper road for reaching the school. There is no electricity. There is shortage of Principal/ professors in the college. There is no arrangement of water, bed, toilets etc. in the hostels. There is no computer training imparted in the I.T.I. There are neither mathematics nor science teachers in the I.T.I. There is nobody to teach Engineering Drawing, we have to learn it ourselves. There is no separate hostel for girls. There is no Principal in the school. We do not know what is School Management Committee. There is lack of awareness about what the Right to Education Act is. ISSUES RElATED TO CORRUPTION AND WRONG mETHODS Most of the time of teachers is spent in taking care of Mid-Day Meal. If the scholarship comes for Scheduled Castes, then the one for Scheduled Tribes does not arrive, so many forms have to be filled again and again, so much time is wasted. Why are the policies not implemented on the ground level? Warden does not stay in the hostel during nights; children have to take care of themselves (from outside elements). In the hostels, (arbitrary punishments are meted out to children/) children are treated as per the whims and fancies of the authorities for e.g. Two children are being removed/ rusticated from the hostel on the grounds that they went to a picnic by mistake with some other group. The scholarship given in eleventh and twelfth standard is Rs. 700-700 only, instead of 1400-1500. No grievance redressal takes place for these issues. Why is no action taken on the government teachers who take private tuitions? When answers to various issues are sought, threats are issued (of beating up/ breaking bones), there is no redressal of such incidents.
After categorization of the questions, Dr.
5/9/2012 5:52:53 PM
19
Anil Sadgopal started talking about the same. Analyzing in detail, the history of education from Macaulay to Manmohan Singh, informing about the real purpose behind making the Right to Education Act and describing the chain of events that illustrates how the government law confuses/ confounds the real goal, Dr. Sadgopal termed the RTE Act as the Black Act in the history of Indian education. He also called the five bills being proposed in the upcoming Parliament Session i.e. the bill bringing foreign universities in India, viz. The Foreign Educational Institutions Bill2010; The Educational Tribunals Bill- 2010; The National Accreditation Bill - 2010; The Prohibition of Unfair Practices Bill 2010; and The National Council for Higher Education and Research Bill2011 a new and naked assault of globalization on education. On the quick spread of education, he said that this was, in reality, privatization of education and a conspiracy to alienate the common person from education and use the common person for global market. He said that the BJP-led coalition government and Congress-led coalition governments have continued to transfer education into corporate hands in the name of PPP (Public Private Partnership) and reducing the expenditure on education, at the same time adopting policies of providing many overt and covert/ hidden subsidies to them in addition to providing land for free or at subsidized rates. He described an example that strengthened the government school system, which was of the Collector of Erode district in Tamilnadu (and his wife), who had admitted his (their) daughter in a government school and thus changed the prevalent thinking about government system.
In the context of the questions, Dr. Sadgopal said that it is not that the root cause of the problems lies only in Delhi; it is (also?) there in areas like Khairwada. But, one thing is for sure that the solution of the problem can start from Khairwada, and in the process of resolution Delhi can be reached and the ultimate solution can be brought about, which can become possible only through our unity. The problems that have been raised can be ultimately/fundamentally solved by people of Khairwada only. Others can at best provide guidance to some extent as it is the problem faced by the people of Khairwada, and it is only they who know their social-economic-cultural and historical context, based on which, the root of the problem While elaborating in detail on the experiments can be accessed and a sustainable solution be on education in tribal areas, Dr. Anil Sadgopal formulated. called on the common people to rise up for After Dr. Sadgopals talk, the programme was bringing about the change in education system concluded by a tribal song, which described how and also informed about the Peoples Education the tribals were not only oppressed by the whiteCampaign being carried out by All India Forum skin Britishers but also exploited by the black for Right to Education in seventeen states of India. (brown) skin Englishmen/ oppressors of India/ He said that people and teachers (could/ should) Indians, who are exploiting India even today just work together and solve the problems one by one/ like the Britishers. The programme was presided each problem at their level. over by Mr. Nathulal Kharaadi of the local teachers union. He informed how the government school The programme concluded with thumping/ system is slowly being demolished so that its enthusiastic songs and slogans. commercialization becomes possible. In order to maintain the dominance over ninety percent of the population, the dominant elites of India have Report prepared by Dr. Vikram Singh Amrawat very calculatedly opened only five percent private (Ahmadabad) and translated by MS. Snehal (Delhi)
schools, so that the children of poor classes become laborers and all their opportunities of reaching the level of governing elite remain obliterated and only the rich upper class continues to occupy the position of power. Dr. Sadgopal made it clear that nothing can be hoped from the current system. So it is the peoples power that will have to rebuild the public education system keeping in mind the common and neighborhood school system in addition to making the education free from K.G. (nursery/ kindergarten) to P.G. (post-graduation). He described the Khairwada Peoples Dialogue on Education as a historic initiative and called on the students, teachers and guardians present in the meeting to build the foundation of education on the twin concepts of Sangharsh (struggle) and Nirmaan (Constructive work) by combining the struggle for education with the struggle for Jal-Jangal-Zameen-Jeevikaa (Water-Forest-LandLivelihood) and build a Peoples Education Model of Khairwada through a political movement.
20
5/9/2012 5:52:54 PM
Protest aGaInst the hIGher educatIon bIlls

Dear Friends, The UPA Government implemented the Right to Education Act from 1st April 2010. The result, as everybody can see, has been the weakening of public education system and big hikes in fees in private sector. The Common School System or democratic curricular objectives have had no place in our education system either before or after the implementation of the Act. However, MHRD minister Kapil Sibal is now carrying out a program for restructuring the entire education system. Having destroyed the school system, he has now initiated market reforms in higher education. A series of Bills related to higher education are before the parliament and maybe passed in the budget session this year which my start on 12th of March. If enacted, these bills will make higher education an unprotected prey for both domestic and foreign corporations. The academic consequences of such `reforms will be catastrophic. The privatelyborne high cost of education will put a premium on disciplines and courses that are directly linked to the demands of domestic and foreign markets that currently generate some jobs and the biggest salaries for few. Fundamental research both in social and natural sciences and pro-people research and democratic syllabi will suffer an inevitable decline. As a consequence, the critical and transformational purpose of institutions of higher education will recede into the background, as they are rapidly turned into `providers of a commodity called `knowledge. NEW BIllS The Foreign Educational Institutions (Entry and Regulation) Bill, opens flood gates for foreign trade in education sector. The Educational Tribunal Bill system seeks to establish a draconian grievance redressal system in conditions in which unionization and collective action, and even recourse to the courts, would be denied to all sections of the university community. The Abolition of Unfair Practices Bill defines only those exorbitant demands for fees that have not been announced at the time of admissions as constituting ùnfair practice and thus legitimizes the rest of all unfair practices!
CALL
Call of AIF-RTE to oppose market oriented reforms in higher education and to organize nation-wide decentralized protest on 16th February against the higher education bills in the Parliament.
The Bill to set up an Accreditation Authority has the declared objective of maintenance of quality. Yet its main purpose is not academic; it functions as an aid to students to decide where they should ìnvest to get the best `returns from the system. In an educational environment as historically, regionally and socially diverse and unequal as contemporary India, it would seriously compromise those courses and institutions that would in fact merit the most support. The said accreditation authority gives licenses to private and public accreditation agencies reducing National Accreditation Council of India to become one among the countless. In the new regime, if established, private agencies will give accreditation to private and public Universities.
21
A National Council for Higher Education and Research, is proposed to be established through Higher Education and Research Bill as the ` singlewindow entry point, so favored by corporate capital, to replace bodies like the UGC, MCI, AICTE, NCTE which regulate diverse academic streams. Now these are seen as hurdles in the onward march of trade in education. The important point to be noted here is that the World Bank suggests to and the World Trade Organization imposes on their member countries to set up a single and independent regulatory authority in every service sector. These independent regulatory authorities will be independent of democratic pressure from people and regulate trade in favor of corporate houses. Again, the proposed Universities for Innovation Bill, even its revised version, empowers the central government to establish new or elevate the existing universities and go for collaboration with foreign universities on trade lines bypassing all existing norms including reservations, procedures of appointment of teachers and admission of students with the only condition that they enroll 50% students from within the country. These universities will bypass all other rules of recognition. Another proposed Bill would legislate on the regulations for Public Private Partnership - a euphemism for siphoning public funds to private agencies.

5/9/2012 5:52:54 PM
Since the 1990s it has become very wellknown that reform in any sector only means privatization, globalization and liberalization of trade regulations. The current agenda of Kapil Sibal is to bring these reforms into the education system and convert it into a market for domestic and foreign capital. That is why the singular purpose behind all the higher education bills is to bypass regulation by the legislative, judicial and executive systems and clear the path for unrestrained trade in education.
result in dissolution of public institutions and establishment of a few elite institutions and many `teaching shops in the private sector. Public money will be siphoned off to private agencies while the poor and disadvantaged will have to pay for poor quality degrees.
The crisis in the educational system, its institutions weakened over time due to corrupt practices under the pressure of profit oriented private institutions on the one hand, and a failure to invest public funds in a sustained manner, on the other, contributed largely to dereliction of duties at different levels. What is required at this stage to bring about genuine reform is to ban trade in education on one hand and decentralize and democratize regulatory bodies on the other. Again, the expansion of the system (only about 12% of young people in the relevant age group are in higher education institutions) and ensuring greater access to students from marginalized and weaker sections of society must form the basis for improving and reforming higher education. However, the Kapil Sibal guided reform process is going in the opposite direction. Commercialization of education and concentration of regulatory powers are aimed at restricting entry into this sector only for the wealthy elite and with the onset of global trade in education, the Indian education system will lose whatever democratic nature it has been able to retain till date. Public Private Partnership will
The NDA government had already offered the higher education sector as a tradable commodity to be regulated by World Trade Organization. The UPA is continuing the offer. In fact, the current Bills are aimed at putting in place the legal structure that would facilitate implementation of the regulations of the WTO. If the offer is not withdrawn before the completion of the Doha Round of trade negotiations, Indian higher education would be governed, in perpetuity, by multinational trade regulations. This would pose a grave threat to academic independence and national sovereignty. It is high time for students, teachers, educationalists organizations and activists and for all people to stand against commercialization of education and wage a determined struggle for common school system and public funded education from KG to PG. It is time for all to struggle for a truly democratic education system that excludes inequalities and includes diversities, an education system that liberates individual creativity and strengthens society to stand against any threat internal or external to the democratic rights and freedoms of the people. Let us all unite and resist higher education bills. Make success the all India protest day on 16th of February, 2012. An overview of the protests organised at various places is available in the ORGANISATIONS DIARY at page no. 30
Student writeS rejection letter to oxford !!
Receiving a rejection letter from the University of Oxford is common, but one applicant has turned the tables by sending a rejection letter to the prestigious University saying it is not up to the mark. Interviews for admission to the ancient seat of learning are considered the most challenging. Very few of those who apply make it, while thousands are sent politely worded rejection letters every year. But Elly Nowell, 19, who went to a state-funded school in Hampshire rather than an elite private school, parodied the admission process and sent a letter of rejection to the university, which has been widely read. Nowell, who was put off by the admission interview that is seen by many as daunting and intimidating, wrote: I have considered your establishment as a place to read Law (Jurisprudence). I very much regret to inform you that I will be withdrawing my application. I realise you may be disappointed by this decision, but you were in competition with many fantastic universities and following your interview I am afraid you do not quite meet the standard of the universities I will be considering. Nowell warned the university not to reapply. You may believe your decision to hold interviews in grand formal settings is inspiring, it allows public-school applicants to flourish... and intimidates state-school applicants, distorting the academic potential of both, she said, criticising Oxfords traditions and rituals and a perceived gulf between minorities and white middle-class students. A university spokesman dismissed the claims.
22
5/9/2012 5:52:54 PM
letter to the Prime minister of India

Dear Sir Subject: demanding to withdrawal of all five higher education related Bills in the Parliament. All India Forum for Right to Education (AIFRTE), its member organisation in Andhra Pradesh, A. P. Save Education Committee and its constituents are opposing the pending Higher Education Bills in the parliament. At the call of the AIFRTE, 16TH February is observed as All India Protest Day against the Bills in 18 states of India. The under signed join the protest for the reasons elaborated below. Your government has introduced five Bills related to higher Education in the Parliament during the last two years (2010 to 2011). They, by short names, as you know are 1) The Foreign Educational Institutions Bill- 2010, 2) The Educational Tribunals Bill- 2010, 3) The National Accreditation Bill - 2010, 4) The Prohibition of Unfair Practices Bill 2010 and 5) The National Council for Higher Education and Research Bill-2011 These Bills have been introduced, ostensibly, to bring about a thorough reform in our higher education system. Yes, these Bills if enacted and implemented will bring thorough reform, of course, in the interest of domestic and foreign market. Your government is bent upon bringing about these legislations at the earliest. The Bills listed above, if enacted, will a) open flood gate to Foreign Direct Investment in higher education and reduce education into a tradable commodity, further will, b) Tribunalise Justice in the field of education trade, c) reduce National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), a public authority, to a position where it becomes one of numerous private agencies resulting in widespread corruption, again, d) will reduce concept of fairness in trade in education service to one of transparency, e) establishes an independent regulatory authority in Higher Education Service Sector (IRA in HE) in line with WTO guidelines ,of course, with a different name NCHER. This NCHER will be independent from democratic pressures of the people and regulate the trade in education service in the interest of foreign and domestic corporate houses. Government of India has already made offers to World Trade Organisation in Higher Education Sector which eventually will become commitments if not withdrawn in course of Doha round. All the reforms in the field of education, the government intended to bring about, will only establish a legal and institutional set up for operationalisation of the agreement with the WTO immediately after completion of Doha Round. Your government believes that the spread of education is possible only through profit oriented institutions. The government policies are formed on the basis of the following misconceived premises namely; a) the economic capacity of the State is limited, resulting in resource crunch for education; there is thus no option but to depend upon private (and foreign) sources for funding education; b) private agencies, compared to public agencies, can render better, efficient and cost effective services; c) the Constitutional principles of equality and social justice can be replaced by the neo-liberal principle of inclusion; d) education is a service rather than being a Right or an Entitlement of every child and youth and, therefore, equal provision for all need not be ensured; e) education is a private good and a tradable commodity, making profiteering through education a legitimate objective, just like in any other trade; therefore, it is valid that quality education is proportionate to ones capacity to pay; and f) education is an instrument for producing human resources for corporate and market needs; therefore, the character of knowledge should be determined by market, rather than by the internal requirements of the discipline or the developmental needs of society. So, basing on its premises the government strives at bringing all reforms in the favor of trade in education sector. People of India cannot agree with the premises. Education cannot be spread in the medium of commerce and trade. Reducing education to a tradable service not only denies education to disadvantaged sections in the society, but also that those who get education will not get it worth the name. Trade in education develops servile attitude in the youth and such youth will not be able to protect the nation and its democratic polity from internal and external threats. Trade in education reduces society into a market. Instead, we demand, education should be developed as an instrument of social development or transformation, We demand your government to immediately with draw all the Higher Education Bills introduced in the Parliament and to establish public education system from KG to PG. We demand establishment of an education system in conformity with the Preamble of the Constitution that directs the State to build an education system for promoting a democratic, socialist, secular, egalitarian and just society in the Republic of India! The education system must be envisioned such that it can promote pro-people national development, respond with sensitivity to the peoples aspirations for equitable distribution of resources, protect socio-cultural and knowledge-related diversity and securing civil liberties and democratic rights, as guaranteed by the Constitution. We demand allotment of 10% of Union Budget for education to meet all economic needs of the movement.
23

5/9/2012 5:52:54 PM
INTERNATIONAL
Everyone agrees the United States needs to improve its education system dramatically, but how? One of the hottest trends in education reform lately is looking at the stunning success of the Wests reigning education superpower, Finland. Trouble is, when it comes to the lessons that Finnish schools have to offer, most of the discussion seems to be missing the point.
What aMerIcans KeeP IGnorInG about FInlands school success
And yet it wasnt clear that Sahlbergs message was actually getting through. As Sahlberg put it to me later, there are certain things nobody in The small Nordic country of Finland used to be America really wants to talk about. known - if it was known for anything at all - as the *** home of Nokia, the mobile phone giant. But lately During the afternoon that Sahlberg spent at the Finland has been attracting attention on global surveys of quality of life -- Newsweek ranked it Dwight School, a photographer from the New York number one last year -- and Finlands national Times jockeyed for position with Dan Rathers education system has been receiving particular TV crew as Sahlberg participated in a roundtable praise, because in recent years Finnish students chat with students. The subsequent article in the have been turning in some of the highest test Times about the event would focus on Finland as an intriguing school-reform model. scores in the world. Finlands schools owe their newfound fame primarily to one study: the PISA survey, conducted every three years by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The survey compares 15-year-olds in different countries in reading, math, and science. Finland has ranked at or near the top in all three competencies on every survey since 2000, neck and neck with superachievers such as South Korea and Singapore. In the most recent survey in 2009 Finland slipped slightly, with students in Shanghai, China, taking the best scores, but the Finns are still near the very top. Throughout the same period, the PISA performance of the United States has been middling, at best.
Learn from Educational Change in Finland? Earlier this month, Sahlberg stopped by the Dwight School in New York City to speak with educators and students, and his visit received national media attention and generated much discussion.
Yet one of the most significant things Sahlberg said passed practically unnoticed. Oh, he mentioned at one point, and there are no private schools in Finland.

Compared with the stereotype of the East Asian model -- long hours of exhaustive cramming and rote memorization -- Finlands success is especially intriguing because Finnish schools assign less homework and engage children in more creative play. All this has led to a continuous stream of foreign delegations making the pilgrimage to Finland to visit schools and talk with the nations education experts, and constant coverage in the worldwide media marveling at the Finnish miracle. So there was considerable interest in a recent visit to the U.S. by one of the leading Finnish authorities on education reform, Pasi Sahlberg, director of the Finnish Ministry of Educations Center for International Mobility and author of the new book Finnish Lessons: What Can the World
This notion may seem difficult for an American to digest, but its true. Only a small number of independent schools exist in Finland, and even they are all publicly financed. None is allowed to charge tuition fees. There are no private universities, either. This means that practically every person in Finland attends public school, whether for pre-K or a Ph.D. The irony of Sahlbergs making this comment during a talk at the Dwight School seemed obvious. Like many of Americas best schools, Dwight is a private institution that costs high-school students upward of $35,000 a year to attend -- not to mention that Dwight, in particular, is run for profit, an increasing trend in the U.S. Yet no one in the room commented on Sahlbergs statement. I found this surprising. Sahlberg himself did not. Sahlberg knows what Americans like to talk about when it comes to education, because hes become their go-to guy in Finland. The son of two teachers, he grew up in a Finnish school. He taught mathematics and physics in a junior high school in Helsinki, worked his way through a variety of positions in the Finnish Ministry of Education, and spent years as an education expert at the
24
5/9/2012 5:52:54 PM
OECD, the World Bank, and other international organizations.
Sahlberg quotes a line from Finnish writer named Samuli Puronen: Real winners do not compete. Its hard to think of a more un-American idea, but Now, in addition to his other duties, Sahlberg when it comes to education, Finlands success hosts about a hundred visits a year by foreign shows that the Finnish attitude might have merits. educators, including many Americans, who want There are no lists of best schools or teachers in to know the secret of Finlands success. Sahlbergs Finland. The main driver of education policy is new book is partly an attempt to help answer the not competition between teachers and between schools, but cooperation. questions he always gets asked. From his point of view, Americans are consistently obsessed with certain questions: How can you keep track of students performance if you dont test them constantly? How can you improve teaching if you have no accountability for bad teachers or merit pay for good teachers? How do you foster competition and engage the private sector? How do you provide school choice? Finally, in Finland, school choice is noticeably not a priority, nor is engaging the private sector at all. Which brings us back to the silence after Sahlbergs comment at the Dwight School that schools like Dwight dont exist in Finland.
25
Here in America, Sahlberg said at the Teachers College, parents can choose to take their kids to private schools. Its the same idea of a marketplace The answers Finland provides seem to run that applies to, say, shops. Schools are a shop and counter to just about everything Americas school parents can buy what ever they want. In Finland parents can also choose. But the options are all the reformers are trying to do. same. For starters, Finland has no standardized tests. Herein lay the real shocker. As Sahlberg The only exception is whats called the National Matriculation Exam, which everyone takes at continued, his core message emerged, whether or the end of a voluntary upper-secondary school, not anyone in his American audience heard it. roughly the equivalent of American high school. Decades ago, when the Finnish school system Instead, the public school systems teachers was badly in need of reform, the goal of the are trained to assess children in classrooms program that Finland instituted, resulting in so using independent tests they create themselves. much success today, was never excellence. It was All children receive a report card at the end of equity. each semester, but these reports are based on individualized grading by each teacher. Periodically, *** the Ministry of Education tracks national progress Since the 1980s, the main driver of Finnish by testing a few sample groups across a range of education policy has been the idea that every different schools. child should have exactly the same opportunity to learn, regardless of family background, income, As for accountability of teachers and or geographic location. Education has been seen administrators, Sahlberg shrugs. Theres no first and foremost not as a way to produce star word for accountability in Finnish, he later told performers, but as an instrument to even out social an audience at the Teachers College of Columbia inequality. University. Accountability is something that is left when responsibility has been subtracted. In the Finnish view, as Sahlberg describes it, this means that schools should be healthy, For Sahlberg what matters is that in Finland all safe environments for children. This starts with teachers and administrators are given prestige, the basics. Finland offers all pupils free school decent pay, and a lot of responsibility. A masters meals, easy access to health care, psychological degree is required to enter the profession, and counseling, and individualized student guidance. teacher training programs are among the most selective professional schools in the country. If a In fact, since academic excellence wasnt a teacher is bad, it is the principals responsibility to particular priority on the Finnish to-do list, when notice and deal with it. Finlands students scored so high on the first PISA survey in 2001, many Finns thought the And while Americans love to talk about results must be a mistake. But subsequent PISA competition, Sahlberg points out that nothing tests confirmed that Finland -- unlike, say, very makes Finns more uncomfortable. In his book similar countries such as Norway -- was producing

5/9/2012 5:52:54 PM
academic excellence through its particular policy Whats more, despite their many differences, focus on equity. Finland and the U.S. have an educational goal in common. When Finnish policymakers decided That this point is almost always ignored or to reform the countrys education system in brushed aside in the U.S. seems especially poignant the 1970s, they did so because they realized at the moment, after the financial crisis and Occupy that to be competitive, Finland couldnt rely on Wall Street movement have brought the problems manufacturing or its scant natural resources of inequality in America into such sharp focus. The and instead had to invest in a knowledge-based chasm between those who can afford $35,000 in economy. tuition per child per year -- or even just the price of a house in a good public school district -- and the With Americas manufacturing industries other 99 percent is painfully plain to see. now in decline, the goal of educational policy in the U.S. -- as articulated by most everyone *** from President Obama on down -- is to preserve Pasi Sahlberg goes out of his way to emphasize American competitiveness by doing the same that his book Finnish Lessons is not meant as a thing. Finlands experience suggests that to win at how-to guide for fixing the education systems of that game, a country has to prepare not just some other countries. All countries are different, and as of its population well, but all of its population well, many Americans point out, Finland is a small nation for the new economy. To possess some of the best with a much more homogeneous population than schools in the world might still not be good enough the United States. if there are children being left behind. Yet, Sahlberg doesnt think that questions of size or homogeneity should give Americans reason to dismiss the Finnish example. Finland is a relatively homogeneous country -- as of 2010, just 4.6 percent of Finnish residents had been born in another country, compared with 12.7 percent in the United States. But the number of foreignborn residents in Finland doubled during the decade leading up to 2010, and the country didnt lose its edge in education. Immigrants tended to concentrate in certain areas, causing some schools to become much more mixed than others, yet there has not been much change in the remarkable lack of variation between Finnish schools in the PISA surveys across the same period. When President Kennedy was making his appeal for advancing American science and technology by putting a man on the moon by the end of the 1960s, many said it couldnt be done, Sahlberg said during his visit to New York. But he had a dream. Just like Martin Luther King a few years later had a dream. Those dreams came true. Finlands dream was that we want to have a good public education for every child regardless of where they go to school or what kind of families they come from, and many even in Finland said it Samuel Abrams, a visiting scholar at Columbia couldnt be done. Universitys Teachers College, has addressed the effects of size and homogeneity on a nations Clearly, many were wrong. It is possible to education performance by comparing Finland with create equality. And perhaps even more important another Nordic country: Norway. Like Finland, -- as a challenge to the American way of thinking Norway is small and not especially diverse overall, about education reform -- Finlands experience but unlike Finland it has taken an approach to shows that it is possible to achieve excellence by education that is more American than Finnish. The focusing not on competition, but on cooperation, result? Mediocre performance in the PISA survey. and not on choice, but on equity. Educational policy, Abrams suggests, is probably more important to the success of a countrys school The problem facing education in America system than the nations size or ethnic makeup. isnt the ethnic diversity of the population but the economic inequality of society, and this is Indeed, Finlands population of 5.4 million can precisely the problem that Finnish education be compared to many an American state -- after all, reform addressed. More equity at home might just most American education is managed at the state be what America needs to be more competitive level. According to the Migration Policy Institute, a abroad. research organization in Washington, there were 18 states in the U.S. in 2010 with an identical or Anu Partanen significantly smaller percentage of foreign-born Journalist 2011 Anu Partanen, as first published on TheAtlantic.com. residents than Finland.
Is that an impossible goal? Sahlberg says that while his book isnt meant to be a how-to manual, it is meant to be a pamphlet of hope.
26
5/9/2012 5:52:54 PM
doWn WIth coMMercIalIsatIon !

Press Note
A Response to AIfETO Press Note and Colombo Declaration

Anti-educAtion Policy of the Government oPPosed by Aifeto
COMMENTARY
ALL INDIA FEDRATION OF ELEMENTARY TEACHERS ORGANISATIONS [AIFETO], WORLD FEDERATION OF TEACHERS UNIONS [WFTU] and NATIONAL CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE OF INDIAN TEACHERS ORGANISATIONS [NCCITO] and MAHARASHTRA RAJYA PRATHAMIK SHIKSHAK SAMITEE [MRPSS] New Delhi: A meeting of executive council of AIFETO has been held under the All India President Prabhakar Arade, overall discussion about anti-education policy of government, the present policy is opposed unanimously. The same decision is to be handed over to the Honorable Prime minister on 7 th April 2012 from all states within the country. The General Secretary Nawal Kishor Prasad Sing[Bihar] stated the Colombo declaration before the meeting in presence with zonal secretary A.Annamalai [ Tamilnadu]. Harsh Narayan Jha [ Bihar], Ram murty [Jharkhand], Jahrlal Chatargee [ West Bengal],Sudhakar Sawant[Maharashtra], Shaligram Patel [ Uttar Predesh] were present in the meeting. B.Vijaykumar General Secretary of World Federation (WFTU-FISE) and Mrinamy Bhattachary guided the meeting. The AIFETO Strongly advocated the redrawing & redrafting of the educational policies to serve the common man. The policy of privatization in education is spreading day by day over the country and education is becoming dearth. The poor of the country are being deprived from their right of education. Only 25 % of the poor shall be enrolled in private schools according to RTE act 2009. The government doesnt care about the remaining 75 %. So, today the RTE act doesnt give justice to the children of country. Therefore we demand the Free, Compulsory and quality education through common school system up to 18 years. Today most of the states are not paying salary regularly and also not as per scales. So the payment should be done regularly. The contract base teachers system like Shikshan Sevak, Shiksha Mitra, [all para-teachers] should be withdrawn and appointments should be done on regular basis. All states must impart elementary education in mother tongue of its state and in addition Hindi and English. The government should withheld the contributory pension scheme and old system of pension scheme be introduced immediately. Let the teachers teach only their regular work and not non-educational work including census, election etc. The school building construction, mid-day meals must not be loaded upon the teachers. Chanchal Kumar Basu, Uttam Gurav,Uttam Kumbhar,G. Murugesan, A.Vincent Paulmm, Anupam Kesari also put their views in meeting. The AIFETO next conference will be held at Chennai on 5th May 2012 . The seminar on Impact of Education Policy on Children of Common Man is the theme for discussion. The experts will state their views. Sudhakar Sawant Spokesman, AIFETO
On AIFETO Document
No doubt, it is against commercialization of education, one wishes, however, that it had taken a clear stand against 86th Constitutional Amendment (2002) and RTE Act, 2009, both of which legitimized the problems relating to teachers status and non-educational work loaded on them that the AIFETO document laments about. Indeed, the following statement in the document ends up lending some degree of legitimacy to the RTE Act due to having misread the farcical 25% provision in private schools: Only 25 % of the poor shall be enrolled in private schools according to RTE act 2009. The government doesnt care about the remaining 75 %. Please note the following:
27
The Act provides for 25% seats out of the private school enrolment, beginning in Grade I in 2010 and covering one additional grade per year incrementally, not out of total number of children in the relevant age group viz. 6-14 year age group. The 6-14 year age group population is about 20 crores. One-fourth of this would be 5 crores. In contrast, the total enrolment of private schools in Grades I-VIII in 2009-10 was 5.7 crore (DISE Data, MHRD & NUEPA, 2011). This means that 25% of private school enrolment in Grades 1-VIII would be only 1.43 crores i.e. only 1.43 crore children from EWS category would be admitted in private school under this provision by 2017 or 2018 when all the eight grades of elementary stage would have been covered under the provision. In other words, after deducting the private school enrolment out of the 6-14 age group population, no more than 10% of the children of the EWS category would be admitted under this farcical provision; 90%

5/9/2012 5:52:55 PM
Colombo Declaration
The decision of the 17th Statutory Conference of the World Federation of TeachersUnions (WFTU-FISE) to hold the Administrative Committee meeting as Annual Conference was implemented here in Colombo, the capital of Sri Lanka on Oct. 15-16, 2011, hosted by Ceylon Teachers Service Union. The Colombo International Conference reviewed the developments since the December 26-28, 2010 Dhaka Conference which had been focused on Build up a World Against Injustice, Illiteracy, Hunger, Poverty and War. The conference strongly asserted the opposition to world-wide politics of exploitation through imperialism, capitalism, market economy which further added to large scale poverty, hunger, illiteracy, Injustice perpetuated through neoliberal-ism and wars. The Colombo Conference held the International Seminar on the most topical theme Social Responsibilities of Education. The Colombo Declaration asserted radical changes in the socio-economic policies and structures to stop the ever increasing discrimination and oppression against the peoples the world over. THE CONFERENCE (i) Strongly advocated the redrawing & redrafting of the educational policies to serve the common man. (ii) Expressed the regret that even the provision of Primary Education was a casualty in many countries and that the target of Education For All was a far cry. (iii) Denounced the negative value orientation being nurtured by the fascist forces to demolish Democracy and Secularism. (iv) Demanded that the social responsibility of Education to protect the basic rights of all the peoples must be the most important task of education policies. (v) Stressed the importance of preservation and promotion of pluralism and multiculturalism throughout the world. (vi) Regretted the increasing employment and un-der-employment, labor related issues which emerged from the pro-rich, neo-liberal policies of the Governments. (vii) Opposed the corporatization of Education and other sectors which promoted privatization and profiteering. (viii) Reiterated the great significance of the UN policy profiles which stressed for massification of Education from Primary to the University level through democratic education system in the public domain. (ix) Supported the UNESCO declaration on Status of Teachers and demanded that the Covenants be respected by all the signatory nations and thus provide proper pay scales and favorable service conditions to the staff working in educational institutions so as to empower all the people through instruments of Education at all levels. (x) Expressed strong opposition to the neo liberal politics which had put Higher Education beyond reach of the people. (xi) Criticized the negative globalization engineered by WTO under the extremely exploitative statutes (xii) Demanded immediate implementation of UN General Assembly granting full state-hood to Palestine and full member ship of UN. (xiii) Condemned unequivocally continued invasion of USA and NATO forces in the Middle-East particularly Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and threaten action in Syria and Yemen in fragment violation of UN Charter. (xiv) Fully supported the Peoples protests against the exploitative, Wall Street mechanizations in the USA which created economic recession, drastic cuts in the social welfare schemes while giving huge financial inputs to promote the corporate culture (xv) Demanded full rights to collective bargaining of the trade unions. (xvi) Welcomed the popular upsurges in Egypt, Tunisia and other nations for decent standards of living and democratic polity, (xvii) Demanded revisiting the austerity measures deployed in Europe and elsewhere, which actually clamped unbearable reductions in social welfare schemes. (xviii) Called upon the world to protect 1.4 billion people in developing countries from extreme poverty, (xix) Demanded review of nuclear energy related power plants which created FUKKUSHEYIA tragedies worse than that of CHERNOBYL (xx) Supported the decision of the 100th Session of ELO Conference which lucidly focused on the right of about 100 million domestic workers, (xxi) Opposed terrorism in all forms and condemned the terrorist activities unleashed in Afghanistan, Pakistan, India and other countries. (xxii) Called upon the Workers, Employees of all sectors, Teachers in the Education sector and the Students and Youth to come together on one platform to defeat neoliberal capitalism to usher in the Dawn of a New Era free from exploitation of man by man and thus to develop Socialist, Egalitarian societies the world over.
children of this category would continue to study in government schools in 2018, provided these schools are allowed to survive by then! The conclusion: If you accept the Acts premise that quality education is provided only in private schools, the above data imply that the Act has provided for quality education for only 10 % of the non-private

school children and has no plans whatsoever for quality education for 90% of the children in the non private school category. And this miniscule inclusion, too, would become possible only by 2017 or 2018! Of course, we must question the Acts premise itself that quality education is the exclusive preserve of private schools. At the same time, we must also understand that the Acts premise is indeed the hidden agenda of the
28
5/9/2012 5:52:55 PM
Act i.e. to destroy government school system and commercialize entire elementary education through PPP. The outcome of this hidden agenda would be exclusion of almost 80% children from elementary education or restricting their elementary education to merely literacy and skill training for global market!! On Colombo Declaration
On the one hand, we must appreciate Colombo Declarations powerful stand against corporatization of Education and other sectors which promoted privatization and profiteering and its unambiguous rejection of neo liberal politics which had put Higher Education beyond reach of the people and the negative globalization engineered by WTO under the extremely exploitative statutes. On the other hand, however, this clarity of stand is contradicted by Colombo Declarations apparent endorsement of UN policy on massification of Education from Primary to the University level through democratic education system in the public domain and UNESCO declaration on Status of Teachers. A historical probe would reveal that UNICEF, UNESCO and World Bank collaborated to sponsor the infamous Education for All Conference in Thailand in 1990 and draft the Jomtien Declaration released
by the Conference which was signed by almost 150 nations, including India. This laid the basic framework for IMF-World Banks structural adjustment in education, opening floodgates for (i) steady decline of public funding till to date in all sectors of education, including both school education and higher education; (ii) replacing public funding of education by external aid and corporate capital through PPP; (iii) promoting corporate houses, NGOs and religious bodies in education in place of public institutions; (iv) reducing education to literacy and certain marketable skills; (v) undermining the status of teachers by pushing the policies of substituting Para-Teachers and contract teachers in place of replacing regular teachers. Indeed, the UN agencies have acted as the human face of IMF-World Bank policies as well as of WTO-GATS agenda! My published writings have consistently shown for more than a decade that, without undertaking such policy analysis, we fall in a trap that undermines our ability to formulate effective strategies of struggle against the assault of the neo-liberal capital and global market on Indias education system.
Dr. Anil Sadgopal Member-Presidium All-India Forum for Right to Education
hIGh court stay on school closure

The two impugned orders were issued on 24.9.2011. The public interest litigation filed by Rashtrakavi G S Shivarudrappa, Jananpeeth and Padmabhusana Awardees Dr.U R Ananthmurthy, Dr.Chandrasekhar Kambar and Dr.Girish Karnad. In the PIL, the petitioners while taking strong objection to the State Governments move to closedown the government schools and also argued that the proposed move is the gross violation of the childs fundamental right to education. The PIL came before the two member bench, Acting Chief Judge Justice Vikram Jeet Sen and Justice A S Bopanna. Honourable bench while setting aside the State governments decision issued an interim stay. As a result, the state should maintain status quo. It is big boost for the ongoing campaign against the closure of government schools. In fact, it is big set back for the unilateral and
arbitrary decision of the state government to close down government schools that have less than five children on the roll despite strong apposition from the civil society and the literary community. The state has thoroughly failed to analyze the reasons for the sad state of government schools in the light of increasing commercialization, commodification and privatization policies in relation to school education.
I personally welcome the interim order passed by the honorable bench and it is a great move in protecting and upholding the fundamental right of children and especially children belonging to marginalized sections of the society to receive free and compulsory education in the neighborhood school.
29
Niranjanaradhya.V.P Centre for Child and the Law, National Law School of India University, Karnataka aradhyaniranjan@hotmail.com RECONSTRUCTING EDUCATION
5/9/2012 5:52:55 PM
ORGANISATIONS DIARY
No.
all IndIa ForuM For rIGht to educatIon

(december 2011 - March 2012)
AIF-RTE with the help of Yusuf Meherally Centre.
Organiser Activities
1.
2.
9-11 December 2011
Dates
11 December 2011 12 December 2011
Yusuf Meherally Centre, Tara (Dist. Raigarh, Maharashtra) Thane, Maharashtra
Place
3.
Mumbai, Maharashtra
Republican Party of India (Athawale Group), Thane city unit Saman Shikshan Mulbhut Adhikar Samiti, Mumbai
Meeting of National Executive and National Council of AIF-RTE. Inaugural issue of AIF-RTEs Newsletter Talim ki Ladai (Hindi) and Reconstructing Education (English) released by Keynote speaker Dr. Anand Teltumbde. Lecture by Dr Anil Sadgopal (Bhopal) on neoliberal assault on Education and the issues related to Dalit Education at a public meeting in a Dalit ghetto in Thane city. Also present in the meeting were Shri Thokchom Surjit Singh (Shillong) and Shri Madhu Mohite (Yusuf Meherally Centre).
4.
26-27 December 2011 December, 2011 December 2011
5.
Govt. Girls Inter College, Haldwani, Uttarakhand
Rachanatmak Shikshak Mandal, Uttarakhand
Resolution adopted by the National Council of All India Forum for the Right to Education was released to the Press in a press conference. In a public meeting chaired by Dr G.G. Parikh (Yusuf Meherally Centre), Prof Madhu Prasad (New Delhi), Prof Anil Sadgopal (Bhopal), Shri Thokchom Surjit Singh (Shillong), Advocate Gayatri Singh (Mumbai), Dr Vivek Korde (Mumbai) and Ms Simantini Dhuru (Mumbai) delivered lectures. Fifth state-level workshop for opposing privatization, commercialization and NGOization of education and for discussing the problems and the remedies in the implementation of common school system based on the concept of neighbourhood school. District-wise co-ordination meetings in order to strengthen Andhra Pradesh Save Education Committee.
6. 7.
Andhra Pradesh Districts of Andhra Pradesh- Save Education Committee Karimnagar Mehboobnagar, Medak and Nalgonda Manipur
10 January 2012
Mandya, Karnataka
Synroplang, All Manipur Students Union

Karnatak Vidyarthi Workshop of district representatives on internal Sangthan contradictions in Right of Education Act and the concept of Common School System. Resource Persons: S/Shri Ramesh Patnaik (Hyderabad),
Beginning of state-wide demand for establishment of equitable education system in Manipur by All India Manipur Students Union on the initiatives of Shri Thokchom Surjit Singh
30
5/9/2012 5:52:55 PM
8.
22 January 2012 22 January 2012
Bangalore, Karnataka Deulgaon Raja, DistrictBuldhana, Maharashtra Deulgaon Raja, DistrictBuldhana, Maharashtra Bangalore, Karnataka Goregaon, Mumbai, Maharashtra
9.
Karnataka Jan Shakti, Karnataka Vidyarthi Sangthan, Karnataka Dedbed Okuta, Various Satya Shodhak Shikshak Sabha, Maharashtra
Lecture by Prof Madhu Prasad (New Delhi) in the inaugural function of conference on Struggle for Equitable and Common Education System. The conference was organized in order to protest against the policy of state government to close the schools and to force the government to change its policies favouring common school system. Inaugural address by Prof Anil Sadgopal (Bhopal) at state-level Conference on educational curriculum. The conference was organized for preparing for struggle for inclusion of curriculum based on the knowledge, values and culture of the common masses in the current curriculum in place of knowledge, values and culture of the high-class and caste.
Organizing Secretary- All India Forum for the Right to Education and Prince Gajendra Babu (Chennai), Secretary- State Platform for Common School System, Tamilnadu.
10. 23 January 2012
11. 27 January 2012 12. January 2012 13. January 2012 14. January 2012
Satya Shodhak Shikshak Sabha, Maharashtra Civic and Inhaf (Bangluru) and Hezards (New Delhi) jointly
Workshop on Common School System for the district representatives of Satyashodhak Shikshak Sabha. Resource Person: Prof Anil Sadgopal (Bhopal).
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh
Samman Shikshan Mulbhut Adhikar Samiti, Mumbai Andhra Pradesh Save Education Committee
Address by Prof G. Hargopal (Hyderabad) and his discussion with Dalit groups on Right to Education, 12th Plan and impact of neoliberal policies constitutional provisions. Pressurizing the municipal corporation through a complaint to State Child Right Commission against operation of a private school in the compound of the municipal school in Transit Camp, Bimbisarnagar. Thorough discussion in a series of meetings on the State Curriculum Framework released by the State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT). A 17-page critique of the State Curriculum Framework was brought out pointing out the dangers of such a curriculum in a multilayered and divided school system.
Shiksha Adhikar Manch, Bhopal
31
15. January and Gandhi Peace Foundation and February, Delhi University 2012
Delhi Shiksha Adhikar Manch
Three meetings were held with All India Revolutionary Students Organization, Revolutionary Youth Federation of India and other social activists on the call of AIF-RTE. The objective of the meetings was to launch a campaign against five bills presented to Parliament for putting education within the purview of WTO-GATS. It was decided to launch a 12-day campaign SAVE HIGHER EDUCATION, SAVE NATION across the country. On the call of AIF-RTE, DSAM held wide-ranging consultation and discussions with teachers, students and educational rights organizations in

5/9/2012 5:52:55 PM
16. January 2012
East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya
Synroplang, Shillong
order to prepare for the campaign against five bills pending in Parliament on higher education in different parts of the city.
17. 2 February 2012 18. 5-16 February 2012
Khammam, Andhra Pradesh Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh Save Education Committee (Khammam Unit) Shiksha Adhikar Manch Bhopal, All India Revolutionary Students Organisation and Revolutionary Youth Federation of India
1. Beginning of social intervention by seven darbars (Khasi equivalent of constitutionally accepted village council) in the district in order to bring improvement in government school system. 2. Work is underway to create awareness among people by translating Right To Education Act in Khasi and by drawing peoples attention to its antipeople format. A day-long seminar on Right to Education Act, higher education bills pending in Parliament and education policy.
19. 13 & 16 February 2012
Hyderabad Central University, Hyderabad
Forum for Protection of Higher Education, Hyderabad Central University Campus
Save Higher Education, Save Nation Campaign 1. Seminar on Attack of Corporate Capital on Higher Education and Our Alternative. 2. Public awareness through gate meetings in institutions of higher education and five market areas and signature campaign on five banners. 3. Every day one pointed questions were posed to both the state as well as the central government. The questions were published in Nav Duniya. But both the governments remained silent. 4. Support was received from different trade unions, writers, organizations and intellectuals through dialogue and interaction. 5. Call for Leeds-Met Quit India at the gate of Indias only foreign university Leeds-Met in Bhopal. It was followed by burning of effigies and hunger-strike. 6. Rally and Dharna for entire day and submission of memorandum to the Governor addressed to the President of India.
20. 16 February Jammu 2012

Progressive Students Association, Jammu University
A debate was organized on the call of AIF-RTE among students on five bills of higher education in Parliament.
On the initiative of Dr K. Lakshminarayan, member, state executive, Andhra Pradesh Save Education Committee, many progressive teachers, students and Dalit intellectuals got together to form Forum for Protection of Higher Education on 13th February. Among the most active groups were Ambedkar Students Association, Bahujan Students Front, Students Federation of India, Dalit Students Union and Tribal Students Front. A seminar was organized on 16th February under the auspices of the newly established Forum to debate on five bills of higher education in Parliament. It was decided to launch a campaign to ensure that these bills are returned by parliament without consideration.
32
5/9/2012 5:52:55 PM
21. 16 February Arts Faculty, Delhi University
Delhi Shiksha Adhikar Manch with Various Progressive Students and Teachers Organizations of JNU, JMI, DU and active Organizations on the issues of School Education and Higher Education Karnataka Jan Shakti and Karnataka Vidyarthi Sangthana
22. 18, 19 & 25 February 2012
Three Region of Karnataka
After deliberation on the attempts by the Govt. on incorporating WTO-GATS agenda in Indian education through five bills on higher education in Parliament, the representatives of different organizations decided that 1. Public pressure must be brought upon to ensure that all the five bills are returned by Parliament itself. 2. Need for nation-wide debate must be stressed for the reconstruction of school and higher education. 3. A paper should be prepared on the alternative vision of education. Supporting organizations: DTF, LDTF, SFI, DYFI, AISA, IRSO, Vidyarthi Yuvjan Sabha, Common Teachers Front, Krantikari Lok Adhikar Sangathan, Sambhavna, KYS, New Socialist Initiative, Shiksha Adhikar Abhiyan and some 20 other organizations. Organization of public debates on the call of AIFRTE in 3 different regions in the state on five bills on higher education pending in Parliament. Meet the Press programme and lecture by Prof Anil Sadgopal (Bhopal) on neoliberal assault on Indian education policy and the need for strong and determined movement for alternative pro-people policy.
23. 25 February Udaipur, 2012 Rajasthan
Vidya Bhavan, Sewa Mandir and Mohan Singh Mehta Memorial Trust & Lake City Press Club, Udaipur Jagruk Shikshak Sangathan
24. 26 February Khairwara, 2012 Rajasthan
25. February 2012

33
Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir
Progressive Students Association, Jammu University
Public Hearing on Education- Teachers, parents, children, youth and women of a tribal belt in Udaipur district raised dozens of questions to a 3-member jury of Prof Anil Sadgopal (Bhopal), Dr Vikram Singh Amarawat (Sadra, Gujarat) and Ms Snehal Shah (Delhi) ranging from KG to PG education system. The jury then responded to all the questions and suggested measures which could be taken by the people themselves to address the problems. Thinker Shri Kishor Sant (Udaipur) and educationist Shri Bhagchand Kumawat also participated in the hearing. Release of local newspaper Ekjutataa Khabar by journalist Shri Ugrasen Rao. A call for creating a Khairwada Model of Public Education which could act as a template for the nation. Enactment of street play to expose the relationship between state governments anti-youth policy in government services and the policy of commercialization of education.

5/9/2012 5:52:55 PM
26.
February 2012
Mumbai, Maharashtra Andhra Pradesh
27. February 2012
Saman Shikshan Mulbut Adhikar Samiti, Mumbai Andhra Pradesh Save Education Committee
A planning meeting was held with progressive political parties, Dalit, tribal and womens organizations along with those working in unorganized sectors for cancellation of bills lying before Parliament on higher education leading to commercialization of higher education.
28. February 2012 29. 7 March 2012
Haldwani, Pithoragarh
and Lohaghat, Uttarakhand
Rachnatmak Shikshak Mandal, Uttarakhand Faridabad Group
On the call of AIF-RTE, organization of dharnas, press conferences and submission of memorandum to the PM at 19 district headquarters of the State in order to oppose the presentation of five bills of higher education in Parliament which will lead to the enactment of WTO-GATS agenda in Indian higher education. 70000 leaflets and 2000 posters were distributed in these districts. Member of state executive participated in all these activities in different districts. Three meeting were organized in Haldwani (5/2), Pithoragadh (19/2) and Lohaghat Public Study of Education was initiated by the village council of youths. Public survey of schools was also conducted. (20/2) against the call given by AIF-RTE for preparing public opinion against the bills of higher education to be presented in Parliament. An online appeal to the PM was launched by Forum for Protection of Higher Education with the aim of drawing his attention to the illusory beliefs underlying the presentation of bills of higher education in Parliament at the behest of WTOGATS. An appeal was made to cancel these bills and to initiate a nation-wide public debate on these bills. 500 signatures have been collected till date and this appeal will be sent to the PM in the near future. Organization of week-long poster presentation and gate meetings on the call of AIF-RTE at different colleges and departments of the university across the city against the presentation of bills of higher education in Parliament for commercialization of education.
30. 7 March 2012
Bhiduki (Palwal District), Haryana Hyderabad Central University, Hyderabad
Forum for Protection of Higher Education, Hyderabad Central University Campus
31. March Second Week 32. 12 March 2012
Bangalore, Karnataka
Mumbai Marathi Saman Shikshan Mulbut Adhikar Patrakar Sangh Hall, Chatrapati Samiti, Mumbai Shivaji Terminus, Mumbai
Karnataka Jan Shakti and Karnataka Vidyarthi Sangthana

Press Conference, called by AIF-RTE, was addressed by human rights activist and wellknown writer Dr Anand Teltumbde, state secretary of AISEC Shri Jeevan Surude and education rights social activist Shri Anand Hoval and Ms Simantini Dhuru for cancellation of bills of higher education in Parliament for commercialization of education.
34
5/9/2012 5:52:56 PM
33. 14 March 2012
34. 17-18 Jahanabad, Bihar Bihar Prathmik March 2012 Shikshak Sangh (Gope Group) 35. 19-21 Jamia Millia March 2012 Islamia, New Delhi
Saman Shikshan In front of the Mulbut Adhikar head quarter Samiti, Mumbai of Chatrapati Shivaji Terminus, Mumbai
Dharna and signature campaign for cancellation of bills of higher education presented in Parliament for commercialization of education. 500 people participated in the campaign and 200 signatures were collected. Lectures by Shri Navendu Mathpal of Rachnatmak Shikshak Sangathan, Uttarakhand and Shri Ashutosh Kumar Rakesh of Bihar Arajpatrit Prarambhik Shikshak Sangathan on right to education versus RTE Act and policy of commercialization of education at Annual Meeting of the organization.
Centre for Dalit and Minorities Studies and Institute of Advanced Studies in Education Jamia Millia Islamia
36. 22 March 2012
37. Last Week of March
Dadar, Mumbai, Maharashtra Bangalore, Karnataka
Saman Shikshan Mulbut Adhikar Samiti, Mumbai Rang Nagri Cultural Group of Karnataka Vidyarthi Sangthana
A five-lecture series by Prof Anil Sadgopal (Bhopal) on The Transformative Vision of Nai Talim: Engagement with Battle for Knowledgefrom Colonialism to Neo-Liberalism. 1. Macaulayian Framework Vs. Phule-GandhiAmbedkars Emancipative Educational Discourse 2. Pedagogy of Productive Work, Language and Knowledge 3. Education, Disparity and Diversity - The Politics of Class, Patriarchy, Caste, Language, Region, Normal Body and Ideal Childhood 4. Neo-Liberal Assault on Education Policy 5. Reclaiming Knowledge, Reconstructing Education Strategy of Change and Radical Path of Struggle & Reconstruction. Dharna and signature campaign for cancellation of bills of higher education presented in Parliament for commercialization of education. Taxi drivers and coolies also participated in the campaign. Week-long street-plays were organized on the questions of language and government policy on education. People were called to participate in the campaign for equitable and common school system. New initiatives in long-standing discussion between AIF-RTEs agenda and active political trade unions of industrial workers of Faridabad.
38. March 2012 Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir 39. March 2012 Faridabad, Haryana 40. March 2012 Assam
Progressive Students Association, Jammu University Faridabad Group Synroplang, Shillong
Poster presentation on relationship between sexual violence and patriarchy. Presentations on the question of inciting communal violence in Rajauri. Beginning of dialogue with local students bodies with the objective of starting work on education in tea plantation in two districts of the state.
35

5/9/2012 5:52:56 PM
Published by Dr. V. N. Sharma, A-100, SAIL Satellite Township Ranchi 834004, Jharkhand. Printed by Mouj Printing Bureau, Khatau Wadi, Girgaum, Mumbai - 400 004
Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 36 5/9/2012 5:52:56 PM

Reconstructing Education April Issue Press

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Reconstructing Education April Issue Press

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

Call Against Higher Education Bills Letter to Prime Minister

Finlands School Success

Convenor: V. N. Sharma (Ranchi)

Dr. V.N. Sharma

Reclaiming Knowledge, Reconstructing Education

Educate! Agitate! Organise!

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 1

Manu, Macaulay and ManMohan

assault on higher education.

BCI strike against Higher Education and Research Bill, 2011

Wto-Gats-educatIon & IndIa

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 8

dIscourse on PublIc versus PrIvate schools

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

aIF-rte natIonal councIl MeetInG a rePort

Very encouraging reports of struggles from

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 11

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 12

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 13

Resolution of the National Council, AIf-RTE

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 15

PeoPles dIaloGue on educatIon KhaIrWada

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 16

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 17

POlICY RElATED ISSUES

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 18

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 19

Protest aGaInst the hIGher educatIon bIlls

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 21

Student writeS rejection letter to oxford !!

letter to the Prime minister of India

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

What aMerIcans KeeP IGnorInG about FInlands school success

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

OECD, the World Bank, and other international organizations.

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 25

doWn WIth coMMercIalIsatIon !

A Response to AIfETO Press Note and Colombo Declaration

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 27

April 2012, Year 1, Issue 2

Dr. Anil Sadgopal Member-Presidium All-India Forum for Right to Education

hIGh court stay on school closure

Rec Edu_Issue 2_working file.indd 29

all IndIa ForuM For rIGht to educatIon

9-11 December 2011

11 December 2011 12 December 2011

Yusuf Meherally Centre, Tara (Dist. Raigarh, Maharashtra) Thane, Maharashtra

26-27 December 2011 December, 2011 December 2011

Govt. Girls Inter College, Haldwani, Uttarakhand