This is not the Bounding of the Divine Will BUT Error in the Knowledge Correct Knowledge and selection OF

WILL against the correct knowledge is impossible but this doeth not implies NONFREEDOM/UNF REEDOM OF DIVINE WILL

but incorrectness in the Divine Knowlidge.EXPL ANATION2:LET IT BE SUPPOSED THAT A OR B ARE TWO MUTUALLY

EXCLUSIV E AND MUTUALLYEXH AUSTIVE POSSIBILITIES.I F THE PERFECT FREE WILL CHOOSES A IT IS DUE TO ITS

FREEDOM. IF THE PERFECT FREEWILL SELECTS B THEN IT IS DUE TO ITS PERFECTS FREEDOM. IF IT IS IN THE

DIVINE KNOWLEDGE THAT '' THE PERFECT WILL SHALL CHOOSE A AT ANY TIME t'' THEN IT ISALSO IN THE KNOWLIDGE

THAT '' THE WILL SHALL CHOOSE IT WITH ITS FREEDOM.DEL ETING THIS FROM DIVINE KNOWLIDGE IS NO THING BUT

TO MAKE DIVININEKNOW LIDGE IMPERFECT.NO W SUPPOSE THAT THE WILL CHOOSETH A WITH ITS FREEDOM

THEN IT IS INACCORDANC E AND IN CONCORDANC E TO THE FOREKNOWLID GE. IF it chooseth/select eth B THEN

it does not lose its freedom but the Knowledge loseth its Correctness and correctivity. Not loosing of correctness of Knowledge doeth

not imply the loosing of freedom of Will. There is no implication of any kind at all between them. From these examples it

is clear Iqbal does confuses between the incorrectness of foreknowledge a nd non freedom of will and due to which he

does believe that in Divine Omniscience .It may be thought that A Non Omniscient God Can Not be the GOD OF ANY SEMETICRELIGI

ON . Hence Iqbalian God Is Not the GOD OF MUHAMMAD {S:AWA}.Iqbal's greatest crime is that he ascribes a Non semetic and Non

Omniscient God to Qur'a:n, which is one of the greatest heresy in the history of religions. Even the Iqbalian GOD cannot be ascribed to

Hebraic Bible, LXX and books of New Testament. Speaking truly the Vedic GOD is also Not NonOmiscient.

POEMS AND PROSE OF THE POET: It is known to a reader of poems and poetries of Doctor Iqbal that he dislike Attributes and

Qualities like intellect, intelligence, Knowledge and prefers love and effection over them. It is somewhat in shadow for a

reader who has not studied HIS LECTURES that he includes Divine Knowledge as well while disgracing Knowledge and

intelligence in general. How ever Iqbal never explains the supposed relation between these two Attributes id est

Knowledge and Intelligence / intellect. Similarly The very same Poet never mentions the relation between Love and

Taste[ affection/ Dhauq]. Luck how ever has favoured Iqbal that a number of ancient heretic sects have tried the same , and

Iqbal is not a unique person to claim that QURANIC GOD IS NONOMNISCIENCT .But it is the worst heresy in the world

of Islamology and Islamic Theology. As a national Poet Of state of Pakistan Iqbal can not be criticised on national level of the state. The

students of Iqbaliat [ a subject invented in Pakistan to study Iqbal and his works]never criticise Iqbal on his this Heretic belief. How even

a number of them who disagree with Iqbal remain silent, and those who discuss this view agree with Iqbal. Outside Pakistan some criticism is found

but the book Reconstruction Of Islamic Thoughts does need to be refuted and responsed completely. Strangely the

religious circles in Pakistan who often quote Iqbal on religious views do not highlight this belief of Iqbal which is PURELY

UNISLAMIC and Non Semetic.