Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Instructions
The
patient
in
the
next
room
is
Nick,
who
is
20
years
old.
He
is
concerned
because
he
has
noticed
a
lump
on
the
left
side
of
his
neck.
You
have
been
given
this
patients
full
history.
You
have
eight
(8)
minutes
to
discuss
with
the
examiner
three
differential
diagnoses-
these
should
be
the
most
likely
diagnoses.
You
should
include
at
least
two
(2)
positive
and
two
(2)
negative
features
of
this
history,
other
than
those
listed
above,
which
support
or
refute
your
diagnoses.
You
should
expect
the
examiner
to
ask
questions
around
your
reasoning.
Tasks
Differential
diagnoses
with
reasoning
8
minutes
History
of
Presenting
Complaint
Name-
Nick
Age-
20
Occupation
Engineering
student
and
keen
football
player
Social
history-
Lives
in
apartment
with
girlfriend
of
6
months
Drug/
alcohol
Non
smoker.
5-6
units
alcohol
(mid
strength
beer)
following
football
on
Friday
nights.
Nil
recreational
drugs
Presenting
complaint
Painless
lump
on
left
side
of
neck,
noticed
by
girlfriend
whilst
cutting
his
hair.
Presents
with
concern
regarding
a
2.5cm
lump
on
the
left
side
of
his
neck,
antero-medial
to
sternocleidomastoid
muscle.
It
was
first
noticed
by
his
girlfriend
3
weeks
ago
whilst
she
was
cutting
his
hair.
Initially
patient
thought
that
he
had
an
enlarged
gland
associated
with
a
viral
illness,
as
he
had
experienced
similar
swellings
in
the
neck
during
a
glandular
fever
infection
(age
17).
The
lump
is
not
painful
and
has
never
been
warm
or
erythematous.
He
reports
no
dysphagia,
dysphonia
or
discomfort
associated
with
the
lesion
locally.
Patient
is
concerned
that
the
lump
has
not
reduced
in
size
and
he
is
experiencing
some
fevers
and
lethargy.
He
reports
no
recent
weight
loss.
Nick
is
currently
studying
engineering
at
UQ
and
is
heavily
involved
as
a
player
and
coach
for
his
local
football
club.
Recently
he
has
been
finding
it
difficult
to
maintain
his
usual
training
and
coaching
regimen
due
to
easy
fatigue.
He
reports
no
dyspnea
or
palpitations
at
rest,
but
breathlessness
has
reduced
his
exercise
tolerance
over
the
past
6
weeks.
He
has
been
dating
Cassie,
a
dietician
at
RBWH,
for
the
past
6
months
and
they
have
recently
moved
into
a
studio
apartment
together.
She
is
his
first
serious
girlfriend,
although
Nick
admits
to
having
brief
sexual
relationships
with
5-6
women
in
the
past.
Currently
Cassie
takes
the
oral
contraceptive
pill
and
this
is
the
couples
main
form
of
contraception.
Nick
describes
his
current
relationship
as
harmonious,
and
Cassies
health
is
currently
good.
Oral
hygiene
is
maintained
and
Nick
denies
any
tooth
pain
or
infection,
he
has
not
recently
undergone
any
dental
procedure.
Nick
has
not
experienced
any
nasal
congestion,
sore
throat
or
cough
recently
although
he
has
felt
feverish
at
night
and
occasionally
wakes
from
sleep
drenched
in
sweat.
He
does
not
report
headache,
muscle
ache,
joint
or
bone
pain.
He
reports
no
nausea
or
vomiting.
Urinary
habits
are
unchanged,
in
particular
he
has
no
symptoms
of
burning
or
frequency
of
urination.
He
has
no
genital
lesions
or
urethral
discharge.
Year
2
OSCE
Practice
2011
Set
3,
Clinical
Reasoning
Station
Past
Medical
History:
Epstein-
Barr
virus
infection
(Glandular
fever)
age
17
Acne
vulgaris-
age
16
current
Meds
Minocycline
100mg
mane
PO
Allergies
/ADRs
Penicilliin-
rash
Past
Surgical
History:
Appendicectomy
aged
10
Adenotonsillectomy
age
8
Immunizations
:
Up
to
date
Family
History:
Both
parents
alive
and
well.
No
sibilngs
Father
-Type
2
Diabetes
Mother
-
Rheumatoid
Arthritis.
Lifestyle
Smoking
Alcohol
Diet
Exercise
Non
smoker
5-6
units
beer
at
weekends
Football/
coaching
4
nights
per
week
Hobbies
football
Pets
none
Year
2
OSCE
Practice
2011
Set
3,
Clinical
Reasoning
Station
Instructions
to
Examiners
The
patient
is
Nick
a
20
year
old
man,
who
is
complaining
of
a
painless
lump
on
the
left
side
of
his
neck,
associated
with
fevers,
night
sweats
and
fatigue.
The
candidate
has
been
given
this
patients
history.
The
candidate
has
eight
(8)
minutes
to
discuss
three
differential
diagnoses,
including
positive
and
negative
features
of
this
history
which
support
or
refute
their
diagnoses.
Conduct
of
this
station
Ensure
the
candidate
understands
the
task
that
he/she
has
to
do.
The
candidate
is
expected
to
discuss
3
possible
differential
diagnoses
citing
at
least
two
(2)
positive
and
two
(2)
negative
points
in
the
patients
history,
other
than
those
listed
above,
that
support
or
refute
their
choices.
They
are
expected
to
have
a
balanced
reasoning,
and
have
prioritised
the
most
likely
diagnoses.
They
should
be
able
to
justify
their
reasoning
with
questions,
if
required-
they
are
expecting
some
questioning
from
the
examiners.
If
the
candidates
appear
to
have
chosen
an
unlikely
diagnosis-
please
ask
them
to
justify
their
choice.
Prompting
the
candidate
for
another
diagnosis
is
permitted
to
allow
them
opportunity
to
discuss
a
more
likely
diagnosis.
TASKS
Differential
diagnoses
with
reasoning
8
minutes
Differential
Diagnoses
1.
Lymphoma
(Hodgkins
/
Non-Hodgkins)
Positive
Negative
2.
Leukaemia
(Acute
Lymphoblastic
Leukaemia)
Positive
Negative
Year
2
OSCE
Practice
2011
Set
3,
Clinical
Reasoning
Station
Unilateral swelling Cervical lymph nodes common location for tumour Painless nodule (as opposed to painful, reactive lymphadenopathy) Localized swelling as opposed to generalized Common malignancy of this age group (4 in 100,000) Most common in 15-30 y.o. with second peak in 50+ More common in Caucasians and males Associated constitutional B symptoms- fevers, night sweats History of EBV infection Fatigue (anaemia, infection) Exertional dyspnea (anaemia)
Neck swelling (lymphadenopathy) Painless nodule Associated constitutional B symptoms- fevers, night sweats Exertional dyspnea (anaemia) Fatigue (anaemia, infection?) Common malignancy of children and young adults
No evidence of infection No bruising or bleeding Localised neck swelling as opposed to generalized lymphadenopathy Relatively less common (1.5 in 100,000)
3.
Reactive
Lymphadenopathy
(Local
infections
of
face
and
oropharynx,
systemic
infections
including
HIV,
Syphillis,
influenza,
EBV,
CMV)
Positive
Negative
2.
Pyogenic
Lesion
(Acne,
furuncle,
abscess)
Positive
Negative
Painless
nodule
Long
time
course
without
change
Associated
fatigue
and
night
sweats
suggest
systemic
response
to
illness
4.
Thyroid
Nodule
(benign
or
malignant)
Positive
Year
2
OSCE
Practice
2011
Set
3,
Clinical
Reasoning
Station
Common cause of cervical lymphadenopathy Fatigue and fevers History of unprotected sexual intercourse Recent commencement of new sexual relationship History of acne vulgaris Long-term broad spectrum antibiotic therapy
Non-tender lymphadenopathy No generalized lymphadenopathy No URT symptoms No periodontal infection No genitourinary symptoms or lesions
Common in age and gender demographic History of acne vulgaris Fever Long-term broad spectrum antibiotic therapy (minocycline) Exercise schedule leading to warm, moist skin
Solitary thyroid nodules common (4-7 in 100) Thyroid malignancy common cancer of young people Associated fatigue may indicate hypothyroidism Associated sweating and fever may indicate hyperthyroidism
Negative 5. Branchial Cleft Cyst, Thyroglossal Duct Cyst, Pharyngeal Pouch Positive Common cause of neck swelling May be painless Negative Relatively late presentation for congenital anomaly (thyroglossal duct cyst, branchial cleft cyst) Not midline (thyroglossal duct cyst) No dysphagia or regurgitation (pharyngeal pouch) Does not explain fever, fatigue and night sweats Does not explain combination of fatigue, fever and night sweats No radiation history Low risk of iodine deficiency More common in women
Year
2
OSCE
Practice
2011
Set
3,
Clinical
Reasoning
Station
MARKING
Examiners
are
asked
to
grade
students
performance
on
a
scale
of
0
-
4
in
the
areas
on
the
mark
sheet
in
capitals.
The
standards
for
awarding
these
grades
are;
0
=
Unequivocal
fail:
Student
was
unable
to
demonstrate
history
or
examination
skills
without
significant
prompting,
OR
displayed
unethical
or
unprofessional
behaviour.
Student
lacked
a
comprehensive
approach,
and/or
needed
considerable
prompting
to
complete
the
task.
Student performed a systematic examination or history but did not complete some components in a number of areas of the marking guide. Student had a systematic approach, required little or no prompting, was confident and completed most components of the marking guide.
3 = Clear pass:
4 = High pass: Examiners are required to make an overall judgement about the students performance in each area on the marking sheet. The specific items listed are there to remind examiners about issues which might be considered. It is not intended that these items should rigidly translate into a score. It would be helpful, particularly when feedback is being given to poorly performing students, if there is some notation in the comments column. Also examiners may find it helpful, when considering what grade to award, to have indicated in the comments column when items were omitted or when prompting was required. Global Score. This mark does not form part of the students overall mark. The score should reflect the students empathy and overall performance, and is from the examiners perspective only. Student had a high level of proficiency, well above what would be expected of a student in Year 2.
Feature General Organised summaries of diagnoses Appropriate diagnoses chosen Prioritises diagnoses Clear communication for presentation Differential diagnosis ONE Most likely and reasonable diagnosis Appropriate supportive points Appropriate negative points Differential diagnosis TWO Reasonable diagnosis Appropriate supportive points Appropriate negative points Differential diagnosis THREE Reasonable diagnosis Appropriate supportive points Appropriate negative points Adequate Reasoning Balanced reasoning Shows understanding of diagnostic signs with questioning
Comment
Score(please circle) 0 1 2 3 4
Pass Mark = 15/20 Pass/ Fail (Circle as appropriate) Comments (essential if the candidate has failed the station) Global Impression- from examiners only- score 0-4