Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
page 0
Contents
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
What is private equity all about? Who drives private equity? How are private equity companies organised? How is private equity done? What makes acquisition-financing special? Main goals of investors European finance leveraged finance market
page 1
Contents
1. 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 What is private equity all about? Definitions Case Study: Private Equity Ltd. acquires Packaging Group Occasions for private equity financing Types of investments
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Who drives private equity? How are private equity companies organised? How is private equity done? What makes acquisition-financing special? Main goals of investors European finance leveraged finance market
page 2
1. Definitions
Private equity financing is the financing of companies via equity that is brought in from outside the organized capital market, i.e. from outside the stock exchanges. The investment involves considerable monitoring, information sharing, and co-determination rights as well as management support.
Private Equity
Private equity is defined as direct investments in the form of shares in companies and equity-related funds, the so-called mezzanine, as far as they grant the above-mentioned co-determination and cooperation rights. Mezzanine is defined as a financing form which either includes equity-related elements (such as co-determination rights, profitlinked payment) or debt elements (such as limited maturity, fixed payments etc.).
page 3
1. Definitions
A private equity company is a corporate entity providing equity to other companies in exchange for shares of equity in these firms. So, private equity companies can participate in the performance of these companies in the medium term. A private equity company is responsible for managing the investors (funders) capital.This implies the following activities: Selection of investment targets Investments Monitoring of existing participations Disinvestments
Funder
A funder is the source of investment capital for the private equity company.
Fund
A fund is a designated pool of investment capital that the private equity company is responsible for advising and/or managing on behalf of the funder.
page 4
1. Definitions
Portfolio Company
A portfolio company is an organisation, which is in receipt of private equity from a fund advised or managed by a private equity company.
Private equity and venture capital are two different topics. Venture Capital is primarily used for transactions in the high technology sector as well as in early stage financing. Private Equity evolves into the generic term for all types of equity investments in non-listed companies. The term differs from the term public equity that characterises the shares of publicly traded companies.
page 5
1. Definitions
page 6
page 7
Sale of 100% stake in Packaging Group to Private Equity Ltd. Transaction Overview Purchase price of 445m (enterprise value) Signing on October 19th, 2006 Closing expected December 14th, 2006 subject to extraordinary general meeting approval and competition authorities clearance
In summary, the role of Private Equity Ltds management includes financial advice on all aspects of the transaction, including the following: Scrutinise the investment opportunity Valuation of Packaging Group Run due diligence process including data room, site visits and Q&A-sessions with management Structure the deal Conduct negotiation of share purchase agreement Secure financing of the transaction Carry out negotiations with acquisition finance departments of banks involved in the transaction.
page 8
page 9
page 10
Overview
Concerning chronological phases of the financing, the private equity financings are divided into early stage financings (venture capital financings) and later Stage financings (private equity financings)
page 11
Seed Financing
The seed financing phase stretches across the period of the preparation of the company formation. It aims at developing the company concept, for example formulating the company objectives, analysing the target markets via market research, and developing production plans etc.). In most formation phases, the equity financing is not yet carried out via venture capital. The company founder normally has to inject a certain amount of his own capital in the companys equity base. Moreover, so-called business angels (i.e., private persons participating in young companies with parts of their assets) often participate as investors in this phase. Additionally, the company founder can use funds from public development companies (ffentliche Frdergesellschaften). The seed money is characterized by the fact that it should represent an investment with an above-average return and a high risk for the investor. The return depends on the success of the companys start up.
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 12
Seed financing is followed by start-up financing. Start-up Financing It is the companys development phase; characterized by the technological maturing of the product up to the production of the prototype. During this period, the creation of an extensive business plan also takes place, together with a detailed company strategy (planning), a competition and product analysis as well as a marketing concept. The formal and juridical company formation is normally carried out during this phase. A business angel or first-stage venture capital financings is used at the start-up financing phase. However, in both cases, a sophisticated and rigorously detailed business plan is required. The business plan reflects the quality of the company and of the entrepreneur. Based on the business plan, the venture capital investors evaluate the economic success opportunities of the business model on the one hand but also the professional and managerial competence of the management on the other hand.
page 13
The focus of the analysis for the evaluation is not only on the technical feasibility but especially on the market opportunities as well. In this phase, founders of an enterprise are in fierce competition with other venture capital seekers. This is why it is advisable for company founders to invest much time and effort in the start-up phase.
page 14
First-stage Financing
page 16
As soon as the company breaks even (starts being profitable following a successful launch in the market), the later-stage financing period begins. Prerequisites for the entry of private equity companies traditionally are: The company has already existed for at least five years. The business model of the company is accepted by the market. The company is profitable. The organisational and personnel structures are sound.
In addition, in late-stage financing period, one can distinguish between the following three phases (at least in the ideal cases): Second-stage financing Third-stage financing Fourth-stage financing
page 17
Second-stage Financing
After a successful market entry, the company reaches a strong growth phase. Sales develop above-average in the growth phase. In order to make growth possible, capital needs to be provided. This defines the type of financing needed.
What is meant by the statement that the above-average growth strongly depends on the sector in which the company operates? Above-average growth can refer to a comparison with the market or with the competition. Sometimes, above-average growth is defined as a double-digit growth rate.
On the production side, the emphasis is on the expansion and optimisation of the production capacities, on the sales side, one of the main tasks is the development of distribution channels. As strong growth is often connected with increasing costs because of a higher working capital need, despite the expansion, the management has to take measures for cost control and cost cutting.
page 18
Here, the establishment of an enterprise resource planning system (ERP system) as the basis for an efficient controlling, reporting and risk management may be considered. In order to fulfil the business management requirements of fast growth, organisational structures have to be created which are tailor-made to the adequate size.
page 19
Third-stage Financing
In this phase of competition growth, the main emphasis is on the strategic exhaustion of market potential. In this phase, the company achieves a sustainable profit. In addition, for the first time longer-term loan financings are carried out which go along with the expansive business turnover process.
Fourth-stage Financing
This phase reflects the economic expansion phase of the company. Once a firm reaches this phase of development, then, the private equity provider has fulfilled its special financing role. Therefore, at this phase, the investors prepare an exit strategy. Their disinvestment can be completed by the following methods: Going Public = IPO Trade sale = sale to a strategic investor Buy back = buyback of the shares by the existing shareholders Secondary purchase = sale to another financial investor
page 20
page 21
3. Types of
Expansion Overview Bridge-financing Public-to-private Solving the succession problem Spin-offs Private Placement Turn Around Buy-and-build Strategy
page 22
Growth financings serve the financing of expansion plans Expansion via internal growth (additional production capacities, additional working capital, market share increase, product diversification etc.) or via external growth (acquisitions which cannot be financed with debt). Private equity companies usually finance a companys growth via direct investments (majority or minority interests) or indirect investments (mezzanine). In business practice, minority interests are usually preferred. Unlike early-stage financings, this is done, mainly due to the existing shareholders desire to limit the influence of the private equity company. Moreover, the cash inflow which is generated by a minority interest usually is sufficient for the financing of the expansion plans.
page 23
A bridge financing serves for the preparation of an IPO. Bridge Financing Here, additional equity is provided for bridging the period until the launch of the company at the stock market. Bridge financings can also be found in the venture capital area between different stages of financing. Bridge financing is defined as the interim financing for the IPO of young technology companies immediately after the venture capital financing.
During this period, the company may take advantage of its non public status to gain experience regarding the expected particularities and requirements of a listed public limited company (plc). Especially the adaptation of the accounting, reporting and controlling standards to the requirements of the capital market make a good preparation necessary. In this context, it is important that the private equity firm provides management support as a feature of its involvement. This support also extends to the so far not necessary investor relations task.
page 24
Another important advantage of the bridge financing is that it provides flexibility to the companies in terms of when to do an IPO. The right moment for the IPO can be adapted by the additional capital without exposing the company to the financial pressure of executing the IPO in an unfavourable stock market environment. A bridge financing usually is carried out through an open (direct) equity investment. Thus, a private equity company can directly participate in the increase of the companys value which is partially already realised via the IPO.
page 25
Public-to-Private
The term going private describes the transformation of a listed company (public company) to a private company. This implies that the shares of the private company are not traded at stock markets anymore as well as the free float of shares is abolished and the number of the new shareholders is very limited
Very often the private equitys intention is to fully control a listed company. Having terminated the delisting process the acquirer tries to increase the targets value by developing it further. After a limited period of time (in business practice 5 years 7 years) the private equity company tries to exit via IPO or via trade sale to a strategic or financial investor.
page 26
A generation change in the companys management as well as restructuring of a company caused by other reasons including the restructuring or exchange of its shareholder circle are the most common reasons for modern solutions which have become known under technical terms such as Management Buy-Out (MBO) or Management Buy-In (MBI). MBOs and MBIs are normally linked to leveraged constructions and therefore represent a variety of the leveraged company acquisition (LBOs). There are a number of reasons for including MBO and MBI in the area of private equity: In most cases, buyouts involve a risk-bearing equity position. For buyouts, equity-similar or equity-close funds mezzanine capital are used differently and on a case-by-case basis within the other private equity business. A buyout is a entrepreneurial challenge which requires techniques used in the private equity business such as controlling, reporting, monitoring, and risk management.
page 27
As prerequisites for a successful leveraged acquisition, the target company to be bought should possess the following prerequisites: Save market position High profitability Low leverage / debt ratio / leveraging Low need for capital expenditures in the near future A company with those characteristics normally has a high company value. The buyout then is based on the following further thoughts: The purchase price will be raised mostly by debt. In the end, this puts a burden on the target company. More interest has to be paid due to higher leverage. Usually, this will be financed based on the targets cash flow. In contrast to the nominal value, the high company value leads to the revealing and activation of hidden reserves (for example, goodwill) in the target companys balance sheet. The additional interest for debt as well as the additional depreciation of the activated indirect reserves lower the profit of the target company and therewith its tax burden.
page 28
Spin-off
In the context of the buyout topic, the so-called spin-off procedures should be mentioned. These transactions concern the spin-off of a department or a division out of a company or a group. The reason for spin-offs often is a change in the strategic focus of the parent company, according to which certain businesses no longer belong to the groups core competencies. But also newly developed activities and products which after maturing are not to be run according to the group managements decision can be considered for a spin-off. As a general rule, those managers who have so far been responsible for the division to be spun-off are the ones who leave the group together with their business unit or division. So they get the chance to keep their former job as an independent manager. Again this is a case, in which the new entrepreneurs normally do not possess sufficient funds to bring up the purchase price for the division to be spun off. According to financing techniques, one can take into consideration constructions for the spin-off which are similar to those for the MBO.
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 29
However, the business planning for such a project includes a higher risk because the business unit to be taken over had not been subject to separate reporting prior to spin-off (in most cases). Thats why significant uncertainties may occur in terms of the cost and revenue projections actually attributed to this business unit, so that a spin-off can be quite similar to a start-up in terms of its risk structure. On the other hand, it bears the opportunity for the independent management to develop significant creative impulses with its business programme - due to the recently gained freedom from the group in order to achieve market success.
page 30
Private Placement
Private Placement is defined as the placement of securities that are not publicly sold and traded, and that normally remain in the portfolio of the first investor after their issue. Apart from the off-market issue of shares, a Private Placement comprises further investment instruments at which the investment capital of private investors is placed as non-voting, wide-spread investor capital (= equity replacement according to accounting standards). A private placement can for example be used for restructuring purposes or for the displacement of a minority shareholder, and it is usually connected with a leverage component.
The advantage of a private placement from the companys point of view consists in limiting the investors influence through contract clauses and directing it according to the company philosophy. The spectrum of investment possibilities that can be offered within the scope of a private issue is much broader and much more interesting than a public security issue at the stock market, and it covers the whole area of mezzanine financing instruments.
page 31
Especially, the non-public capital market can offer no-certificate (and therefore cheaper) and non-voting investments (partially with significant tax advantages for companies and investors). In Germany, for a long time only little attention was paid to the alternative possibility of raising equity via private placement on the non-public/OTC (= over the counter) capital market. Against the background of Basel II and the common restraint of banks regarding the granting of loans as a result of the restructuring of the credit business, more and more companies make use of the advantages of a private placement.
page 32
Turnaround
Turnaround financings provide private equity for companies, which are either in a restructuring phase or have just completed one. Analysing potential investment opportunities, the private equity company focuses on sustainable future profits. Especially the issue of reaching the profit zone and sustaining that level of profit is subject of the private equity companys examination.
page 33
With a platform strategy or a buy and build strategy, companies are consolidated out of a polypolistic market environment in order to benefit from synergies which can arise from e.g. a stronger purchasing or distribution power or from reduced administrative expenses. Initiators of a platform strategy often are the investment companies themselves which with their own teams - analyse sectors as to their suitability for a platform strategy and integrate adequate market participants into a company. A bigger market participant thereby serves as a nucleus which then, with appropriate financial strength, acquires competitors and therefore makes the realisation of economies of scale possible. With an increasing company size and the connected growing market power, the attractiveness of the platform strategy increases for foreign industrial investors who want to extend their market position. This development results in an exit alternative for the private equity company, and the possibility of realising the value added that resulted from consolidating the companies.
page 34
4. Types of Investments
With an direct investment, the private equity company acquires shares in the subscribed capital of the company with all rights and duties linked to it. Direct investments are connected with voting and co-determination rights. Direct investments make the owner participate in the hidden reserves of the company and so in the company goodwill and opens up the opportunity to realize a profit from the sale of the investment. This profit results from the difference between the sale proceeds and the purchase price. For existing companies, the purchase of the shares takes place within the context of a capital increase or through the purchase of existing shares. The entry via a capital increase can only be realised if the existing shareholders do not exercise their purchase right. Details from the cooperation between the private equity company and the shareholders are regulated in a shareholder agreement which however is legally effective only internally. Externally, the investment company appears with the unlimited rights and duties of an open shareholder.
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 35
Direct Investment
4. Types of Investments
The duration of an open investment is not limited by contract, but persists until it is sold to another shareholder. But as a financial investor the private equity company has a limited investment horizon which normally can be depending on the investment purpose ca. 5 years - 7 years. Because of this time limitation, the disinvestment perspective is already an important decision criterion for the private equity company if it makes the investment. The sale (the so-called exit) of the open investment can be carried out through different ways. Crucial for the position of the investment company within the shareholder circle is the amount of the open share. Hereby, the spectrum stretches across minority interests without blocking minority to the complete takeover of the company. Investment companies that only have a minority interest in a company often request a contractual guarantee that they take over the majority and therewith the management of the company if the profitability of the company develops significantly negative and if risks that concern the further existence of the company are connected with this development.
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 36
4. Types of Investments
Direct Investments
Advantages
Disadvantages
Company maintains independence and responsibility for business operations Higher level of equity capital to finance growth and investments Little or no interim interest or dividend payments required
Acquisition price depends on value of the company (company valuation required) Lower value and price for minority interest (no strategic premium) Financial investor receives higher value for shares at time of exit (exit opportunities must be demonstrated) Co-determination of major business decisions with financial investor
page 37
4. Types of Investments
Indirect Investment
Via indirect investments the company receives equity but the private equity company does not get any shares in the company. That is why the private equity company does not appear externally, i.e. it is not registered in the commercial register. The investment remains anonymous. Public limited companies are an exception. The private equity company has the obligation to place in its shareholder deposit, and after the termination of the stipulated shareholder relationship, it can claim the redemption of the deposit. Unlike a borrower, the indirect shareholder participates in the companys profit. Another term for indirect investment is mezzanine.
page 38
4. Types of Investments
Indirect Investments
Advantages
Disadvantages
Company maintains independence and responsibility for business operations Higher level of equity capital to finance growth and investments Collateral is typically not required No principal payments on investment funds; original shareholders retain full value should value of the company increase
High required return on investment Most financial investors prefer direct investments with potential to realize higher value at time of exit
page 39
Contents
1. What is private equity all about?
Who drives private equity? Bidder groups for equity capital The role of banks in the private equity business Investors in private equity
3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
How are private equity companies organised? How is private equity done? What makes acquisition-financing special? Main goals of investors European finance leveraged finance market
page 40
Overview
The bidder groups mainly differ by the characteristics of their sponsorship, i.e. by their shareholder background. Captive funds Public funds Independent funds
page 41
Captive Funds
For captive private equity companies, the funder is the parent organisation. Generally, private equity companies intent to maximise the internal rate of return. If corporations (not private equity companies) invest in a target and the investment is not only financial but also strategic driven, the companies are called captive private equity companies (or captive funds). These captive funds are very often technology oriented acting as window of technology for their parent companies. They take up new trends early in single technology areas and benefit from them. Captive funds can apart from a profit orientation also pursue other company objectives with more or less strong specification.
page 42
Public Funds
Public private equity firms usually conduct the investment financing with the purpose of promotion of the economic development in order to e.g. help structurally weak regions attract young companies or to settle high technology companies in a region. They often have a regional or sector-specific orientation. The responsible bodies are normally corporations under public law.
page 43
Independent Funds
Independent funds are private equity firms with independent shareholder teams. Independent funds usually are exclusively orientated towards profit maximization which is reflected among others in the specific design of these private equity firms organisation, such as the choice- and investment decision process as well as the degree of investment support and control. The management of the independent funds usually is controlled via incentives (especially variable and performance-based remuneration agreements), whereas captive funds, in their relation to their investors, i.e. their parent companies, are more characterised by authoritarian performance features (rules or prohibitions). Because of the competition for qualified management personnel, one can notice an increasing importance of the performance-based remuneration.
page 44
Business Model
Objectives
Equity Investments
Looking into the balance sheet of banks, the participation in other companies are reflected by various positions, which can be divided into the following categories: Shares and other trading investments: purpose of this exposure is short-term profit through trading Shares and other equity financing investments: predominant motive is profit in the medium-term after further development of the portfolio company. Realisation of profit through sale of the investment. Strategic investments: Long-term intentions based on strategy, in order to secure the markets, know how etc. The sale of the investment is not intended. Subsidiaries: A worldwide banking group typically consists of a multitude of companies and strategic investments which are all formally investments of the parent company. It shall be understood, that in this case one cannot talk about investment companies in the sense of this chapter. Only the second point (shares and other equity financing investments) can be referred as to private equity business.
page 46
Different investors
The majority of private equity investors differs from the typical capital market investor. Originally, i.e. in the 50s, in the US, mainly funds of private investors (family money) were invested. Over the years, banks, industrial companies, insurances, pension funds, mutual funds and even the government (in the context of the Small business programme) have participated. In 2000, the following investor groups primarily contributed to the fund raising in the US (almost 93 billion $): pension funds with at least 40 %, insurances and other financial institutions with more than 23 %, mutual funds with at least 21 %, private investors with almost 12 % and companies with 4 %. In Germany the development proceeded in a different way. Here, the first development phase was almost exclusively financed by credit institutions. However, recently their share has decreased. In 2004, their share was only 20 %.
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 47
The largest proportions of new funds raised in 2005 in Germany were accounted for by pension funds with 37.4 % and with 14.4 % for funds of funds. Credit institutions provided 11.6 % and public capital sources 7.7% of the new funds. This area also accounts for - apart from the activities of the Mittelstndische Beteiligungsgesellschaften - the public coinvestment and refinancing programmes as well as the public private equity firms. Furthermore, insurance companies (8.1%), private investors (5.7%), capital markets (5.2%), reinvested capital gains (4.9 %) and other capital sources (4.7%) were of importance.
page 48
Exhibit 3: New funds raised according to capital sources in Germany Source: BVK
page 49
The first half of the year 2005 shows the following ranking of nation-wide investment: Baden-Wurttemberg (41.7%), Bavaria (20.0%), Thuringia (8.0%), Lower Saxony (6.4%) and Rhineland-Palatinate (5.8%).
page 50
Exhibit 4: Geographical distribution of investment first half 2005 in Germany Source: BVK
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 51
The biggest fund-raising proportion in 2005 was accounted for by buyout transactions with 65.2%. Other important sources were expansions (15%) as well as significant high tech expansions and high tech early stages.
Exhibit 5: New funds raised according to financing phases in Germany Source: BVK
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 52
In the first half 2005, funds were distributed to the sectors as follows: consumer goods (20.7%), mechanical engineering (16.2%), computer (8.5%) and medical (8.1%).
page 53
Exhibit 6: Sectoral distribution of investment first half 2005 in Germany Source: BVK
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 54
Contents
1. 2. What is private equity all about? Who drives private equity?
3. 3.1 3.2
How are private equity companies organised? Separation of fund and management Subsidiaries
4. 5. 6. 7.
How is private equity done? What makes acquisition-financing special? Main goals of investors European finance leveraged finance market
page 55
Overview
The general rule is a separation of fund and management company, i.e. the private equity capital and its management are within different companies.
Investment Company
A fund is founded, where the available investors capital is brought in. The fund acquires the investments.
A management company that manages the fund is elected. Management Company It therefore receives 1.5% 2% p.a. of the subscribed fund volume and participates in the funds performance only after a minimum return is provided to the investors capital. The minimum rate of return (hurdle rate) lies between 8% and 10% p.a. IRR (internal rate of return). The profit share of the management company lies between 15% and 20 % (carried interest) of the profit earned. A management company can simultaneously manage several (subsequent or theme) funds. Decision criterion for or against the separation of management company and investment company is the choice between openend fund and closed-end fund.
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 56
Definition: A open end fund represents a permanently running investment business. An open end fund operates similar to a bank, which permanently borrows money and relends it in the form of loans without facing a temporary limitation on its activities. In principle this kind of business can also be formed by agreeing to separate the management company and investment assets, as the example of DBG, DBAG shows. With an open end fund however, this separation is not obligatory. Definition: In a closed end fund a certain fixed investment sum is invested in private equity projects. The objective is the sale of possibly all projects with a high value added within a previously arranged fixed time horizon. The entire task from fund raising trough to the exit (and achievement of possibly high capital gains) is usually done by a team of private equity professionals. The private equity professionals present their qualifications to the investors on the basis of their track records and their prior performance, i.e. their previously achieved successes in private equity projects.
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst
page 57
The purpose of closed fund businesses is the flexible perception of investment opportunities: Private equity experts are able to recognize cheap market opportunities for private equity capital investments, e.g. in certain growth processes, and to successfully take advantage of these up to a certain amount. They commit themselves only to promising capital investments that are within this defined amount, a defined time period and possibly a defined kind of entrepreneurial undertaking. They also want to benefit from the undertaking through (differently structured) success premiums (carried interest). The capital for such an undertaking is therefore brought into a closed fund which is settled and returned as a whole to its investors. If new market opportunities occur, new closed funds are formed to take advantage of these opportunities. The only permanent aspect of this business principle is success given the management company.
page 58
2. Subsidiaries
Captive funds, on the other hand, are mostly managed by staff divisions or subsidiaries, i.e. the investment and management company are identical. The outsourcing of the investment financing business to an independent subsidiary has, among others, the following reasons: Loss separation: separation of the managing entity from losses which the investment financing business might cause. Admission of partners: easier admission of partners. Profile-building: establishment of an independent profile of the PE firm, independent from the image and profile of the managing entity. Liability according to 32 a GmbH: In case that a bank provides direct investment financing and debt financing to a company (if it provides debt to the portfolio company in addition to private equity), it may face the problem that, in the event of portfolio firms bankruptcy, the debt can be considered by court to have equity replacing character. The consequence would be that the assets which originally should serve as collateral of the debt cannot be drawn, i.e. the debt provided by the bank would be assessed like being equity (which usually is an unsecured claim).
page 59
2. Subsidiaries
Through adequate measures, such as the group-owned private equity firms orientation according to the UBGG (Law of private equity firms) or the legal involvement of partners (according to company law) who hold the majority of the, in this case only group-related private equity firm, such risks can be avoided. The UBGG thus opens up the exemption from the risks of 32 a GmbH law for so-called captive private equity firms, i.e. private equity firms whose shares are mainly held by a bank.
page 60
The operative management organ can be the company executives board (private limited company (Ltd. = GmbH)) or the board of directors (public limited company (plc = AG)). As to the operative business, the management tasks mainly cover the acquisition, current support and sale of investments the fund raising the inner organisation, the human resource management, the controlling the development of the strategy of the private equity firm
Depending on the scope of tasks and business volume, the number of people involved can vary from one-person-management to five- or six-head committees with one chairman/president or speaker.
page 61
Almost all German private equity companies posses a control- and advisory organ, no matter if the legal form specifies this, like the supervisory board of a public limited company, or not. As long as it is not a public limited company, the committee is not called supervisory board, but advisory board or administrative board. Concerning the tasks, they are quite identical to those of the supervisory board of a public limited company and normally involve: decisions on proposals of the executive board regarding the purchase or sale of investment projects, as long as these do not fall into the managements own competency which is mostly depending on the size of the investment the decision on proposals of the executive board regarding fund raising (e.g. capital increase, borrowing of a loan) the decision on the executive boards strategy proposals the examination and, if need be, the approval of the annual report, possibly also the decision on proposals of the executive board regarding the choice of the auditor
page 62
significant personnel decisions such as the appointment and dismissal of executives (or board members) and the clarification of their material contract conditions, normally also the application of a full power of attorney, possibly also the application of a power of procurement (in case the latter does not fall into the executive boards competency).
Single tasks are often transferred to a kind of preliminary committee (e.g. investment committee) in order to reduce the burden of the supervisory board. This is usually applied to decisions on investments with a fixedlimited amount.
page 63
4. Inner organisation
Functional departments
The inner organisation is determined by two functional employee groups. the group of the employees who are responsible for the active investment business, i.e. the project managers and the project professionals the group of the employees responsible for all other functions: finance and controlling, human resource and organisation, administration, altogether also called services.
page 64
4. Inner organisation
Additional departments
TIn better organised and usually larger companies, one can additionally find the following institutions as organised structures: investment controlling: this function is crucial for current monitoring of the development of the single portfolio companies, especially through current comparisons of actual figures with plan figures. If certain business target figures are involved (such as return on sales, equity ratio, leverage, liquidity, etc.) the controlling then evolves to an early warning system; decision finding committee: the decision finding committee, where the executives and certain leading employees such as the head of investment controlling and the head of accounting as well as those directly responsible for a certain investment project, debate on propositions regarding the purchase or sale of certain investments, with the objective to make decisions in its own competence or present the project to the responsible committee with a certain recommendation; treasury: the treasury as special institution apart from the finance and controlling, if the fund raising is fully developed as an independent function.
page 65
Contents
1. 2. 3. What is private equity all about? Who drives private equity? How are private equity companies organised?
Investment contract Basic types and significant parts of the contract Adoption of existing contracts, important side contracts and covenants Project-oriented milestones Participation in advisory and control organs
5. 6. 7. 8.
How is private equity done? What makes acquisition-financing special? Main goals of investors European finance leveraged finance market
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 66
The contract which regulates the investment relationship can describe completely different types of relationships. Common types of investment relationships are: purchase of existing company shares (from current shareholders) by the private equity firm, thus displacement of the existing owners increase of the companys equity within the existing legal form and raising of the additional amount or participation in the raising by the private equity firm; investment of equity by the private equity firm in a special legal construction, independent from the companys legal form; in Germany this often takes place in different forms of silent partnerships; investing funds by the private equity firm in hybrid forms between liable equity and loan (mezzanine capital), e.g. as a subordinated loan and an interest rate which is increased by a risk premium; partially connected with call options like a convertible etc.; Between these different basic types, all various combinations are possible and common.
page 67
As far as the purchase of existing shares or shares to be created via capital increase are concerned, according to German law, especially the shares in limited partnerships, shares in private limited companies stocks are considered. It shall be understood that private equity firms usually only participate in legal forms with limited liability, thus for e.g. they do not become partner in a partnership or a partner with unlimited liability in a limited partnership. The risk of the investment must remain limited to the paid-in capital or the purchase price for the shares, at best increased by consents with fixed amounts of a participation in further recapitalisations. Through the purchase of shares in a company in the existing legal form, a private equity firm would only be one shareholder among others. But in fact, it mostly is a shareholder sui generis. The cooperation with a private equity firm brings elements into the company agreement, the operation method, and the objectives of the company, which often do not exist in this form prior to the entry of the private equity firm.
page 68
These new elements are reflected in significant parts of the agreement and important covenants / side agreements on which the private equity firm has to place value. The significant parts of the agreement concern 1. transactions that require an approval, i.e. a catalogue of measures which only can be executed with the approval of the private equity firm or of a committee in which the private equity firm is represented; 2. information rights, i.e. a catalogue in which the kind and scope of information according to a matter-of-fact content and time rhythm is described; 3. the private equity firms claim to be represented in a supervisory or advisory organ (advisory board, supervisory board, administrative board) with its own employee or a person of their confidence (they trust in)
page 69
In some cases, such a regulative structure already exists. Then, special negotiations are not necessary. However, most often the decision-finding and decision-making process in medium-sized companies (family-owned companies) is not yet organised in the way required by private equity firms, prior to the entry of the private equity firm. The executives or the entrepreneur are/is in that case not used to dealing with business policy, its objectives and significant other business issues with a third party in a critical way.
page 70
In order to illustrate the content and meaning of the approval and information rights of a private equity firm, the following examples shall serve: measures which would make something different out of the company than it was in the beginning of the investment (change of the business programme) measures which mean significant financial expenses (investment intentions) or which change the financial structure (leverage) measures which have a significant influence on the management structure (appointment of executives and similar measures) measures, which could lead to conflict of interest with shareholders, leading employees, etc. measures which could lead to significant risk exposures (large loans to customers, unsecured foreign exchange and stock transactions).
page 71
Procedures and facts that must be know for a current assessment of the situation and development of the company must be provided to the private equity firm and therefore require a current briefing. The current effect of this development in figures is especially important. The current briefing is at the same time a significant prerequisite for a reasonable use of the approval rights. Being confronted with these requirements of the private equity firm towards the contractual form of the cooperation, the entrepreneurial negotiation partners are regularly divided into two groups: a group who feels such restrictions on their entrepreneurial freedom of decision-making as unacceptable, a group who is not scared by such requirements, because they feel confident and they do not dare to convince competent negotiation partners of their ideas, or to yield to their stronger arguments, in this case willingly and with a profit.
page 72
Company statute
Regardless of whether the acquired investment is an open or silent investment, the project manager must carefully scrutinize the effective company statute, i.e. the company agreement and possible regulations among the existing shareholders. Subject of the examination is if the statute contains clauses which are incompatible with the private equity firms interests. The following examples can be named: If the silent partnership contract with a limited partnership for example stipulates that a cancellation on the part of the private equity firm is only possible after for example, 8 years at the earliest, then it should be considered that the limited partners are not allowed to cancel their own company relationship at an earlier date. If the private equity firm commits to leave its share of the profits partially or completely within the company in order to strengthen the companies financial profile, then the limited partners should not be allowed to withdraw their dividends completely.
page 73
Also loans granted by the existing shareholders to the company which have equity character or serve as a replacement for equity, should be, according to interest rate and withdrawal rights, and shall be explicitly regulated in a way that the interests of the private equity firm will not be injured.
page 74
Additional agreements
Not all rights and circumstances that are essential for the investment relationship from the private equity firms point of view emanate from the company agreement. Partially, they do not even belong there. If need be, information have to be gathered or additional agreements have to be made. Here, one particularly has to think of: Commitments to execute important measures that are necessary for the realization of the objectives named in the business plan, e.g. capital expenditure programmes or personnel measures. If need be, the whole business plan has to be mutually declared as business basis of the investment relationship. Intended or guaranteed arrangements regarding marital property regime (such as separation of property between shareholders and their spouses) or testament and succession arrangements. Due to their very personal character respective clauses should contain the possibility of being changed. This fact should be known at the beginning of the investment and a commitment should be obtained that the private equity firm will be informed of any changes.
page 75
Contracts with or among shareholders, especially concerning the exchange of goods and services against payment, e.g. the purchase of certain good and services at shareholders, moreover employment and pension contracts with shareholders. It should be understood that the profitability of a company could be hollowed out by such regulations. Agreements on possible exit, for example what is to be done if one shareholder group especially the private equity firm wants to sell its shares, while the other group of shareholders tries to block the exit? Especially here, significant interests of both parties can be at risk and therefore, mandatory, enforceable agreements are difficult. It is clear that one can not make it mandatory that the company has to do an IPO after (for example, five years at latest). However, this can be defined as an objective, and certain steps towards it can be set in stone. Such steps could be the conversion of the company into a public limited company, personnel pre-decisions on composition of the board of directors as well as the supervisory board, agreements on the prospective consortium and the start of pre-negotiations with the potential lead-arranging bank. Naturally, all this does not guarantee the success of the IPO, but it provides the private equity firm with certain rights in case the other party might block their planned path, e.g. because of a change in their interests.
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 76
Moreover, agreements on buyback rights or shareholder options can be important, as well as mutual offer commitments in case of displacement, as long as such rights are not already included in the company agreements.
page 77
Example
How can an investment negotiation be terminated successfully even if there is no mutual consent between the entrepreneur and the private equity firm as to the company evaluation, but nevertheless, both parties still believe in a successful company development? Lets assume that the company needs an equity increase of 5 million to implement its business plan and both parties agree on that need. We further assume that both parties wish to avoid giving a majority of voting rights to the private equity firm. Thus, the investment ratio to be reached with an equity increase of 5 million must not exceed 49.9 % of the shares. This can be realised if the enterprise value as capitalised earnings value after the equity increase of 5 million - at least amounts to 10 million . This presumes that both parties either agree on the profit expectations as to the projections (e.g. 1.5 million p.a.) and subsequently might agree on the discount rate (e.g. 15 % p.a. as to the current income), or that mutual consent is given on the discount rate and the projections actually lead to mutually accepted profit expectations which result in the target enterprise value with the assumed interest rate.
page 78
Assuming that in our case, the private equity firm only considers an enterprise earnings value of 8 million (instead of 10 million ) to be justifiable (e.g. because it assesses the annual profit expectation more carefully to be 1.2 million ). In that case, with an investment ratio of not more than 49.9 %, it could only cause an equity increase of 4 million . However this would be less than the desirable level of the liable funds for strengthening of the business planning. The solution could look like this: the private equity firm acquires for 4 million a share of near 50 % in the increased voting capital. Moreover it makes a silent investment of 1 million for which a fixed annual interest rate - that is independent from the actual gained annual profits - is paid as a pre-profit sharing. In the end, the total return of the private equity firm will be slightly below their desired return, but therefore be a bit more secured at the lower end.
page 79
Significant participation and information rights of the private equity firm have to be realised in many cases via the participation in an advisory or control organ. In most companies outside the stock market this institution is called advisory board. If important managerial measures are tied to the approval of such a committee, it is possible that the representative of the private equity firm will be overruled. This can be considered to be a risk which could be avoided if the respective approval rights were all in the hands of the private equity firm. In practice however, the solution normally looks different: it depends on the personnel composition of the committee. If it is a matter of independent, qualified, competent personalities, then the best guarantee for an appropriate decision is given. Majority decisions and crucial votes are not common in such qualified staffed committees, independent from the regulations of the statute or the rules of internal procedure of the committee unless in extremely urgent cases.
page 80
A disputable point is usually discussed until the doubts of single members are cleared out. If necessary however the single member must accept being overruled by respected and qualified colleagues. But how does it really look like with the qualification of the members of an existing company advisory board in the practical case? Or: If the advisory board really should be only just established because of the investment intention: Which members can be won for it that possess the necessary qualifications and are accepted by the shareholders of the company? The experience shows: cooperation in a competent advisory board should usually be preferred over other solutions, but: if existing advisory boards are missing the requirements, or a competent replacement is difficult, then the project managers of the private equity firm should insist that they can realize their participation rights outside of a committee. There are plenty of propositions, e.g. by consultants, on the right composition of a medium-sized company advisory board.
page 81
Usually it is explained, that due to expected interest conflicts all those are not taken into consideration as members who are already advising the company on other issues, especially against payment: the auditor/accountant who audits the company, the legal advisor and the tax advisor, the consultant, the representative of the house bank. Instead, members of the advisory board should be persons who have their own experience with managerial tasks and managerial responsibility. However, they should of course not belong to the companys customers, suppliers, and especially not to the competitors of the company. And they should not come from big companies where a completely different company culture prevails. Finally, they should still be active in their jobs and not be retired. If one bases these ideal standards, the real possibilities to choose from are often running towards zero. As a matter of fact, the advisory boards nearly always come at least partially from the forbidden camp. If they are competent personalities, they will cope with possible interest conflicts.
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 82
Contents
1. 2. 3. 4. What is private equity all about? Who drives private equity? How are private equity companies organised? Investment contract
How is private equity done? Milestones of a private equity process Organisational milestones Project-oriented milestones Case Study: Private Equity Ltd. acquires Packaging Group
6. 7. 8.
What makes acquisition-financing special? Main goals of investors European finance leveraged finance market
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 83
ORGANISATIONAL MILESTONES
Recruiting
Fund Raising
PROJECT-ORIENTED MILESTONES
Deal Flow
Due Diligence
Business Plan
Investment Negotiations
Investment Support
Exit
page 84
2. Organisational Milestones
Recruiting
The management team of a private equity firm has a crucial impact on the private equity firms success. The management team must be in a position to filter promising business concept out of a multitude of investment opportunities with a manageable effort, and in the further course, to provide management support to the advised investment companies (that means to create added-value).
Apart from financial expertise, investment managers should, possess sector-specific knowledge which makes it possible for them to achieve the expected added-value. They need to possess the experience and the background to handle complex situations in efficient and effective ways. Moreover, the investment manager has to possess communication skills necessary for dealing with the information processes of the portfolio companies. An investment manager should be able to operate effectively, despite the conflicts of different professional requirements and perform the important role of an intermediary between the stakeholders.
page 85
2. Organisational Milestones
Investment managers are in charge of an average of 5-8 company investments, whereas they normally accompany each project from the beginning until the exit stage. On average the managers spend about 40 % of their work time on the choice and the closing of new projects, another 40 % on the supervision of portfolio companies and about 20 % on other tasks such as the less frequent investment sales or private equity firm internal measures (such as, marketing, reporting etc.).
The extent of the investment managers contribution in the investment project depends among others on the private equity firms strategy (specialisation vs. diversification strategy) and on its phase-specific orientation (early-stage vs. later-stage). Early-stage projects are generally more support-intense. Broadly diversified private equity firms can only contribute a less profound support. In times of crisis, the complexity of the support role from a portfolio company increases significantly.
page 86
2. Organisational Milestones
The spectrum of support hereby rather stretches across from passive accompanying and supervision measures (handsoff support, initiation of business contacts, presence in advisory board committees) to active intervention in the operating business of the portfolio company (hands-on support, intervention in or takeover of the company management)
page 87
2. Organisational Milestones
Fund Raising
The source of investment funds is directly linked to the shareholder identity and the background of the private equity firm. Captive funds or corporate ventures are usually financed either fully or partially by a parent company that provides the funds. These parent companies take into consideration profitability targets as well as other targets in their investment policy. Public funds are allocated from public budgets according to budgetary conditions. Independent funds are received from external investors. These can be institutional investors or private persons, domestic or abroad. Given, the principle of the freedom of contract, there are no special legal regulations for the recruiting of investors. For the recruiting of investors, in the market however, a more or less standardised procedure has evolved including following steps: Memorandum Distribution Closing Paying-in of the capital
page 88
2. Organisational Milestones
Memorandum As a first step in fund raising, a private placement memorandum is created. This memorandum is a prospectus that explains the planned investment policy of the fund and in particular specifies the criteria for the investment decisions. In addition, the structure of the fund is explained from a legal and tax perspective. In this case, there is no prospectus liability, as with the liability that is an important factor in public offers.
page 89
2. Organisational Milestones
Distribution After the preparation of the memorandum, potential customers are approached. It is common to approach customers either directly using in house contacts or to out source this activity by engaging distribution companies and specialised fund raisers. Private equity firms of large banks often attract investors via the branch network of the parent company; smaller private equity firms usually engage fundraisers for this purpose. For the procurement of investors, a fundraiser charges a placement fee of about 2 %.
page 90
2. Organisational Milestones
Closing Once the management company has reached its acquired capital volume, it declares the final closing of the fund. After closing, additional investor participation in the fund are not accepted. The closing process can be carried out gradually in several steps.
page 91
2. Organisational Milestones
Paying-in of the capital Investors do not mostly pay the fund capital in one lump sum amount. The funds are paid in trenches (drawdowns), depending on how the management company succeeds in finding projects in which the capital should flow. That is, the management companys aim is not to manage liquid funds in order to minimize administrative expenses, and avoid low margins. Furthermore, investment in trenches provides control and retention of some funds by the investors, thereby providing them the possibility to control the proper fund management. That is, in the case of irregularities, investors can reject the next drawdown, for example.
page 92
3. Project-oriented Milestones
Deal-flow
How does a private equity firm acquire projects which are worth being financed? Deal-flow: Deal-flow is defined as the flow of project propositions that reach a private equity company. => passive approach Screening: Screening is the systematic process of finding and identifying projects among those in the deal-flow that are worthy of being financed. => active approach The deal-flow is in general fed from the following sources: Direct contact: entrepreneurs and companies often directly contact a private equity firm with their proposed deals. This process is dependent on the reputation of the private equity firm. The private equity firm remains passive, apart from the measures to build up a reputation. Network: Indirect contacts via the network of the private equity firm (multiples, other Private Equity firms, parent company etc.).
page 93
3. Project-oriented Milestones
Acquisition: The capital investment firm contacts an entrepreneur or a company after conducting research that identifies a capital need or an investment opportunity for that entity. Auction: The private equity firm participates in an auction procedures where investment projects are presented to interested parties who are participating in the bidding process. The generation of a high-quality deal-flow is of significant importance and is a strategic success factor. That is, a high-quality deal-flow process can significantly reduce the expense of the screening (project choice) and the later examination (due diligence) of investment-worthy projects. Private equity companies often announce their basic strategic orientation to the market by advertising in professional magazines or through information events and thus signal what kinds of investment projects are interesting to them. In this context, (sector) specialisation provides competitive advantages over a broadly diversified investment strategy in the acquisition of interesting projects.
page 94
3. Project-oriented Milestones
Apart from sector specialization, forming a network of so-called multiples (consultants, accountants, banks, other private equity firms etc.) facilitates benefit from the deal flow of the network participants. Private equity companies attempt to avoid direct competition for investment projects with other equity investors because the resulting competitive pressure usually has a negative impact on the negotiated investment conditions (price, co-determination rights etc.). Therefore, it is important to get in contact with investment-worthy companies before other private equity companies by an adequate signalling (e.g. image, pointing out the value-added trough the private equity firm). With speeches at Chambers of Industry and Commerce or through a participation in business plan competitions one can try to monitor the market regarding investment-worthy projects systematically in order to know more about interesting projects as early as possible.
page 95
3. Project-oriented Milestones
After identification of investment-worthy projects, now the real investment process of the private equity company starts. The investment process will now enter a more crucial stage. The private equity company has now the chance to have a look at more sensitive information during a due diligence. This will enable the private equity company to determine a more accurate value for the target company. Consequently, the interested private equity company can refine their ideas about how to structure the deal and what financing is needed to complete the process. The due diligence will reveal all material issues concerning the business of the target company. A due diligence in the private equity business includes two stages: rough analysis detailed analysis
Due Dilgence
page 96
3. Project-oriented Milestones
Rough Analysis In the rough analysis, investment projects are examined real-time in terms of their investment worthiness against the selection criteria set by the investment strategy or policy. In this analysis, the non-fulfilment of only one criterion (especially the return expectation) can lead to a rejection of the project. Typical criteria for choice of projects during the rough analysis are: industry-/sector-specific orientation region-/country-specific orientation phase-specific orientation (e.g. specialisation on early-stage projects) targeted investment volume (absolute and relative to percentage of the shareholders capital, minority or majority interest) investment type (direct / indirect investment) expected return economic development and perspective targeted influence on the business development
page 97
3. Project-oriented Milestones
Detailed Analysis The detailed analysis is significantly costly. In this analysis the investee company is examined in detail and in all different segments at the company level. This analysis involves participation of external specialists. Normally, the due diligence process is divided in the following areas: legal due diligence: analysis of the company contracts, patents, possible liability or warranty claims insurance due diligence: analysis of possible insurance-technical risks management due diligence: analysis of the relation between organs of the target company technical due diligence: examination of the technical feasibility of the developed technology or the developed product. market due diligence: examination of the competitive environment and market environment tax due diligence: analysis of the tax situation; tax statements, latent taxes, tax credits etc. financial due diligence: analysis of the annual reports, business projection figures.
page 98
3. Project-oriented Milestones
Business Plan
In order to get an impression of the potential of the private equity company, the investment manager will always request a business plan. A business plan should contain information on the following issues: company (internal procedures, information systems, controlling) product and applied technology entrepreneur and management team and market and competitive situation economic development (actual / planning) Apart from verbal explanations, the business plan has to contain an appendix which consists of the profit and loss statements, balance sheets as well as cash flow projections for 3 to 5 plan years. The plan figures of the business plan are the basis for the first valuation by the private equity firms. The planning assumptions are therefore examined thoroughly by the investment managers in terms of plausibility.
page 99
3. Project-oriented Milestones
Company Valuation
The following methods are applied in order to calculate the enterprise value: Internal Rate of Return Net Asset Value Multiples method Earnings Value method and Discounted Cash Flow method It has to be mentioned that the expected profits from the sale significantly influence the value of the portfolio company. The detailed examination of the exit possibilities is therefore an indispensable analysis step in the early valuation phase. In order to include risk into the analysis, very often different valuation methods are applied (mostly different multiples plus DCF) and therewith an average value is calculated scenario analysis are created and the based projection assumptions are changed into best, real and worst case simulations.
page 100
3. Project-oriented Milestones
Investment Negotiations
Although the private equity company has the possibility to thoroughly examine the portfolio, uncertainties still remain. They have an impact on the feasibility of the financial planning. For example there is the incentive for the entrepreneur to present its company in a better state than it really is, or to hide risks and weaknesses in order to achieve a higher purchase price. In order to counteract this behaviour and so at least to obtain subjectively honest information by the investee company, the private equity firm has to create incentives for a fair behaviour. In this context, rules can be implemented in the contract, which turn a potential disadvantage for the private equity firm caused by the investee into a disadvantage for the investee.
page 101
3. Project-oriented Milestones
The following measures are common: Financial commitment of the seller in form of a sellers note Performance-dependent correction of shares Milestone financing Combination of direct investment and mezzanine capital Financial commitment of the management Monitoring and influencing the business development
page 102
3. Project-oriented Milestones
Investment Support
The investment financing concept links the provision of funds to the management support component. Hereby, the investment capital financing stands out from the classical service of a passive finance intermediary. In terms of intensity of the support activity, one distinguishes between: Hands-on: The private equity firm supports the whole spectrum of managerial activity with advisory and know-how transfer in the areas of product development, strategy/planning, financing, marketing, distribution, human resource development. Hands-off: no management support Semi-active support: medium support intensity, often only in single chosen business functions
page 103
3. Project-oriented Milestones
The degree of intensity depends on the problems and the support needed by the portfolio company; furthermore, the cost-benefitconsiderations play a role. Overall aim of the support is the acceleration of the company development. Through supporting and attending to the companies invested in, the private equity company tries to reduce the risk of its investment through the involvement in the information flow and to contribute to the value-adding e.g. via the activation of business contacts of the company. The scope of the involvement and of the influence is based on the strategic orientation of the private equity company. The spectrum stretches across from the presence in the advisory board committees to the active participation in the companys management.
page 104
3. Project-oriented Milestones
Exit
The profit from the sale of the investment plays a decisive role in determining the return in the investment financing business. Basically, the following exit types exist: Going public: Through a placement of the company at the institutionalised capital market, the fungibility of the so far hardly liquid investment is increased. Hereby, the possibility exists for the private equity firm to sell its investment completely or partially in the course of or as a result of the IPO. Trade Sale: In this case the private equity firm has the possibility to sell its investment in parts or as a whole to an industrial or strategic investor. Buy back: This means the sale of the private equity firms investment to the other shareholders, usually to the main shareholder. In comparison to the other exit channels, the lowest profits can be expected here due to the usually limited financing possibilities of the shareholders. Secondary purchase: In this case, the private equity firms investment is sold to another private equity firm / financial investor. Thus, a private equity firm that specialises in earlystage financings can sell a company to a private equity firm specialised on later-stage financings.
page 105
Mastered competition between strategic buyers and other financial investors Clear and consistent communication of sellers selection criteria: price speed secure financing Careful preparation of the purchase process significantly increased transaction certainty Selection criteria of Packaging Group: Experience of Private Equity Ltd., its approach and strategy Private Equity Ltds financial strength Private Equity Ltds strong link to the financial institutions financing the transaction Test and analyse financing of transaction at an early stage in the process Private Equity Ltd. was always on top of latest development Detailed preparation of negotiation process A large transaction team including full senior level involvement at all stages of the process
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 106
page 107
Key Phases of the Sales Process set up by Packaging Groups M&A adviser
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 108
Confirmation of financing facilities and financing approval requested early in the process (to be included in the binding offer) Competition between financing banks as bidders involved 2 - 4 banks each Banks are willing to provide finance for an enterprise value based on EBITDA of up to 4 - 5x.
page 109
Due Diligence
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst
page 110
page 111
Provide Private Equity Ltd. with an opportunity to gain a positive impression of Packaging Groups management Answer any questions arising from the data room visits Complement the due diligence process Clarify and explain the information provided in the data room: Explain the assumptions behind the business plan Provide background information on strategy and future development of the Packaging Group Present managements view of competition and the positioning of Packaging Group Provide additional information on suppliers, products and customers
page 112
Negotiation Process
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst
page 113
page 114
page 115
Contents
1. 2. 3. 4. What is private equity all about? Who drives private equity? How are private equity companies organised? How is private equity done?
5. 5.1 5.2
What makes acquisition-financing special? Definition and challenges Case Study: Acquisition Financing of Packaging Group
6. 7.
page 116
Definition 1
page 117
Leveraged Buy-out
MBO
LBI / LMBI
LBO/LMBO
Buy-in
Buy-out
page 119
Exit
market value of equity market value of debt
market value added (e.g. increase in company value)
30%
100%
70%
page 120
Syndicated Loan
Acquisition financing has developed to an interesting and lucrative special product within the field of corporate finance. In comparison to standard credit products, acquisition financing is more complex and has a higher degree of risk. Professionals in this field need to have a broad and deep knowledge in financing-, planning-, valuation-, tax- and legal subjects. Acquisition financing is therefore handled by special departments, most of the time called structured- or leveraged finance department, within the corporate finance department of a bank or an investment bank.
page 121
Debt Ratio
Liability
Collateral
Because of this structure, the collateral for the financing banks is limited. Therefore, the cash-flow of the target company is of crucial importance. One goal in acquisition financing is the economic and legal separation of cash-flow streams for exclusive bank financing use, as well as the fiscal optimisation of the financing structure in order to increase net cash-flows.
Prof. Dr. Dr. Dietmar Ernst page 122
Target Company
Definition 2
Definition 2: In general acquisition financing refers to a cash-flow oriented, structured financing. Its task is to find optimum financing solutions for investors and banks based on an agreed purchase price using custom-made financing instruments and considering the legal and fiscal constraints. In acquisition, financing cash-flow analysis has a central role.
page 123
Initial Situation
page 124
Contents
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. What is private equity all about? Who drives private equity? How are private equity companies organised? How is private equity done? What makes acquisition-financing special?
6. 6.1 6.2
Main goals of investors Main goals of equity capital investors Main goals of debt capital investors
7.
page 125
Return on equity
The financial investors goal is to keep the portion of equity financing as small as possible. He would like to profit from the economical gearing effect of debt financing (leverage effect). This leverage effect implies that the debt ratio of a company should be increased as long as the total return of capital covers the required return on debt. From an economical point of view, this means that for the equity investor: The smaller the portion of equity used at the time of the investment, the higher the return on the invested equity after the exit. The debt financing portion is however limited by the maximum debt service ability of the target. Further it is not in the interest of the financial investor to encumber both, the single purpose company and the target, with debts higher than their maximum debt service ability. This would thereby endanger everything - the liquidity situation of the single purpose company and the target company and thus its paid-in equity.
page 126
Limited liability
A further goal of the equity investor is to limit his personal liability and to make this risk as small as possible. Therefore, he will attempt to limit his economic risk to the invested equity and to transfer the liability to a single purpose company (NewCo or SPC) and the target company. This NewCo acts as a liability bumper and financing pot for and between the private equity company and the target company. This NewCo also holds all acquired shares of the target company. It further stands as a credit applicant for the acquisition loans, which are needed to finance the purchase price. The NewCo is held responsible with all its assets for the liability of debt financing; normally this exclusively consists of the interest in the target company.
page 127
Contract flexibility
Financial investors also attempt to structure the whole financing in such a way that it offers the highest degree of flexibility as possible (to the investor). This flexibility is in particular desired in regards to the organization of the credit agreement. A perfect credit agreement for financial investors should be formulated in a way that the resulting rights and obligations are as favourable as possible to the investors. In detail this covers: flexibility concerning the credit availment (precedent period, minimum amount, currency option) minimization of the obligations in the context of the conditions precedent, the representations and warranties as well as the covenants (inclusive financial covenants) minimization of the enforced credit collateral
page 128
The idea behind acquisition financing is based on the economical rationale of the leverage effect. Therefore, the equity capital investors will aim at a high debt ratio in the acquisition financing structure in order to increase their return on equity. On the other hand, it is in the best interest of the debt capital investors to endeavour to hold their credit risk at the smallest level possible. That is, the debtholders prefer a low debt ratio in the acquisition financing structure. In other words, debt providers demand from financial investors an equity investment that is as high as possible. Debt capital investors are aware of the fact that based on a predefined maturity and a fixed interest rate, an increase in debt ratio leads to a higher required debt service by the borrower. Therefore, considering this risk, debt capital investors attempt to limit their capital share in the acquisition financing to an extent that the repayment seems safe within the agreed maturity.
page 129
Collateral
In an acquisition financing which uses a single purpose company structure, typically, the debt service of the acquisition financing is served by the acquired company. Thus it logical for the acquisition financing to essentially focus on structuring a claim on the future cash-flow streams of the acquired companies. Despite this cash-flow orientation of acquisition financings, credit collaterals play a substantial role in acquisitions and serve as a basis for a purchase price financing decision by the banks. Since, banks attempt to keep their credit risk as low as possible, they attempt to maximise the extent of and the access to credit collaterals. The collateral requirement, first focuses on the acquisition target. If there are not sufficient collaterals there, banks demand that the equity investors, place additional collateral. This request, however is contradictory to the equity investors goal of limiting their liability on the paid-in capital of the single purpose company.
page 130
Since acquisition financings usually require a large credit volume together with a increased risk position, banks frequently attempt to diversify that risk through syndication. Syndication means that the risk of the financing is shared with several banks. Definition: Syndicated Loan Syndicated Loans are joint credit agreements between several banks and one credit applicant. A Syndicated Loan is not a standard type of a credit contract; all forms of credits and periods can be represented. Syndicated Loans have middle to long-term maturity and entered through a reciprocally binding, individually drafted master contract. Acquisition financing is normally arranged through a single bank (called an underwriter in the financing process). This bank (is also called the lead arranger in the syndication process) then pursues the goal of syndication.
page 131
This means it allocates a part of the acquisition financing loan to other banks (called arranger) in order to reduce its own exposure to the financing risk. Lead arranger and various arrangers then make an offer to other banks to join the syndicate by offering them all rights and obligations of that contract (general syndication). Depending upon their risk estimates, price strategy, portfolio preferences etc. the invited banks (participants) join the syndicate. In order to ensure syndication, the underwriter must pay attention to the marketability of the credit. That is, it must negotiate typically acceptable credit conditions, in order to ensure a placement potential of portions of the loan with a syndicate of banks.
page 132
Return on debt
The banks goal is to obtain an interest income commensurate with the riskiness of their loan. This required return is called the risk-adjusted return on capital. The debt capital investors goal of yield optimisation can be accommodated by a combination of arrangement fees and current interest charges over the maturity period of the loan. One has to pay attention to the fact that both the debt and equity capital investors want to obtain yield maximization from their commitment. This is only possible if the target can carry the high interest and the amortization payments stipulated in the acquisition financing. If the promised cash flows stipulated in the business-plan, is not realised, then all financing parties are likely to face losses. That is, when the business plan falls short of its goals, the financial investors loose as the expected increase in value of the enterprise does not occur and the net yield desired in form of the IRR (internal rate of return) is not achieved. If the debt service is not or cannot be fulfilled, then the financing expenses increase as costs are incurred to address the covenants, these costs lead to a net yield decrease.
page 133
In addition, the net yield of the financing banks depends on the economic success of the target. Based on their seniority and their contractual position, claims of debt capital investors are always served before those of equity capital investors. Nevertheless, an economic inclination of the target also has large effects for debt capital investors. In order to avoid insolvency, in such cases banks have to adapt their conditions to the ability of the borrower to service the debt. Since survival of the whole financing commitment is the centre of attention, debt covenants are only conditionally enforceable in such a case. Consequently, risk-adequate interest charges can no longer be obtained.
page 134
financial investor
acquirer / vendee
banks
page 135
Contents
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. What is private equity all about? Who drives private equity? How are private equity companies organised? How is private equity done? What makes acquisition-financing special? Main goals of investors
How does acquisition financing work? Functionality of Leveraged Buy-Outs Exploiting the Leverage-Effect Improvement of Cash flows Improvement of Company Valuation Integral parts of successful Leveraged Buy-Outs
page 136
Increase in value
The fundamental procedure for a leveraged buy-out consists of equipping the NewCo, which acquires the target company, with a high debt ratio (60% to 70%) and repaying this in a relatively short period. The use of a high leverage effect, as described below, leads to a good return on equity for financial investors which is realized by reducing the company's indebtedness. LBO candidates typically possess additional potential for an increase in value. Financial investors pay particularly attention to utilizing all possibilities for an increase in value. These are: whole exploitation of the leverage effect, in order to finance the company with as low capital costs as possible improvement of the cash-flows, in order to reduce the company's burden of debts as fast as possible improvement of the valuation of the company, in order to realize a maximum increase in value with the later exit
page 137
market value added (e.g. increase in company value) LBO - deal closing
30%
100%
70%
debt relief
page 138
Leverage effect
In an LBO the buyer himself uses the leverage effect of debt to improve the return on his paid in equity (leverage effect = gearing). The leverage effect functions based on the following mechanism: The yield on equity (return on equity - ROE) and/or the internal rate of return (IRR) increases the debt ratio (gearing = debt/equity) improving ones return, as long as the total profitability (return on assets - ROA) is higher than the interest payments on debt (after taxes). Enterprises with a low operational leverage before the acquisition can afterwards profit from a high fiscal deductibility of interest payments in connection with a safe loan amortization to further increase the return on equity. This effect is realized because of the disciplinary effect of high indebtedness.
page 139
Despite the undisputed benefits of the leverage effect, it should always be kept in mind that the increased profitability of equity is obtained at the price of a higher risk based on the use of a high debt ratio (Modigliani & Miller). This higher risk also leads to a higher required interest rate on the acquisition financing loan. In practice, the leverage effect reaches its limit at a point where the exaggerated use of debt leads to a dependence on external sources of liquidity or even to a liquidity crisis in the event that operational result of the company fall short of expectations.
page 140
In an LBO, certain measures are used, in order to cause a balance sheet optimisation, which makes a sustainable improvement possible. These measures are necessary in order to meet the obligation of servicing a high level of debt. Here the following measures are possible: fixed assets and working capital optimisation strategic reorientation of the enterprise efficient capital allocation know-how transfer by financial investors improving performance (by elimination of underperformance) of the enterprise asset stripping
page 141
Fixed assets and working capital optimisation An improved management of fixed assets (e.g. leasing of equipment and facilities, sale and lease back of real estates) and working capital (e.g. optimisation of the accounts receivable management and exploitation of given dates of payment) may lead to improved results in a short time period. In particular, free cash flow optimisation is a suitable measure for improving the bottom line.
Know-how transfer by financial investors The inclusion of a financial investor in LBOs can lead to a reinforcement and a support for the management by the new managers and supervisors or advisers, who are selected by the financial investor. Furthermore, the improved enterprise management and control demanded by financial investors (corporate governance and corporate control) can cause an intensified transparency and efficiency of operations and likewise contribute to an improvement in the bottom line.
page 142
Elimination of underperformance in the enterprise Realizing a maximum increase in the company value is one of the highest LBO priorities. Therefore all inefficiencies that arise in typical LBO situations due to the "illusion of satisfactory underperformance" have to, and frequently really can, be reduced. As an additional source of increasing returns, the fiscal and regulatory benefits may also be exploited.
Asset Stripping A classical source for gaining additional liquidity after a LBO is the so-called asset stripping. It concerns the sale of property that is not necessary for operation and is a badly performing division, which no longer belongs to the core business of the company. Proceeds of the sale are used both for loan amortization and for investments into a more profitable core business operation.
page 143
A further important source for an increase in value and for later capital gains for private equity investors participating in LBOs is the improvement of the company value. In the private equity sector purchase price-multiples (e.g. EBITDA multiples and EBIT multiples) are used to measure these price improvements. The increase of the enterprise value can be achieved in two ways: increase purchase price-multiple by improving the return and profits increase purchase price-multiple by optimally adjusting the company size
Increase purchase price-multiple due to improved returns and profits If the investors, together with the management, succeed in improving the return and the profitability of their company, the new enterprise valuation (e.g. EBIT x EBIT multiple) will be influenced by an increased EBIT, and also by an improved EBIT-Multiple. The logic behind this fact is that the improved returns and profits of the company develop so positively that they are now above the sector average and therefore, have to be evaluated with a purchase price-multiple lying above the sector average.
page 144
Increase purchase price-multiple due to an optimised firm size The company's size also plays an important role in company valuation and is considered in the purchase price-multiple. To capture the interest of strategic or financial investors generally a critical company size has to be reached. As a rule of thumb, private equity investors consider a turnover size of approximately 50 millions. With enterprises of this assize, a certain market position and a minimum reporting compliance are assumed. The market position plays an important role in the eventual investment exit (harvest) and the reporting compliance and accuracy is needed for operational handling after the acquisition. Therefore, as the firm size rises, ceteris paribus, the purchase pricemultiple also rises. With a rising company size it is also adopted that the stability of the company and the associated rating of the company improves. The chance on valuation improvements by a size-conditioned rating is a substantial reason for conglomerate acquisitions referred to as LBU (leveraged build-up)- strategies.
page 145
Beside an improved rating, the primary goal of this strategy is to become the market leader in certain niche markets and to achieve a critical size which enables attractive exit opportunities like an IPO (initial public offering) or a sale to either strategic investors (trade sale) or financial investors (secondary buy out). In numerous empirical studies it had been shown that on average there is an increase in value with LBOs in practice. In particular, productivity increases are observed for nearly all MBOs and MBIs.
page 146
Success Factors
Despite the positive effects of buy-out financings there are also a significant number of less successful and/or failed leveraged buy-outs and acquisition financings. The challenge of acquisition financing is managing two different types of risk simultaneously. financial risk, which arises as a result of the high (dynamic) debt ratio operational risk, which consists of obtaining high cash-flows, necessary for the debt service In order to limit the above risks, some success factors must be carefully fulfilled within LBO transactions.
Attractive LBO market environment An attractive market for LBO financing exists, if we have a verifiable economical and technological stable and highly developed market, in which only a few competitors are operating (oligopoly markets). Typically these markets have gone through a strong growth phase in which only the strongest enterprises have won out over others. Due to existing market entry barriers, less substitution possibilities, and dependence of the customer and/or supplier side enterprises, in such markets it is possible to obtain the necessary high and stable cash-flows for a LBO financing.
page 147
In the ideal case, these markets are independent largely from the economic situation as well as not exposed to substantial regulations risks - like for instance a liberalisation pressure in strongly regimented markets. A monopolistic market position is in most cases analysed very critical by investors, because the exit possibilities are viewed as difficult. A generally accepted management tool for evaluating the market position is "Porter's Five Forces".
LBO proficient company In an attractive market the company should be ideally the market leader with an outstanding name (branding). The market leadership towards competitors should be justified based on so called USP's (unique selling propositions). Furthermore, the enterprise should have ultramodern business equipment and/or facilities, which do not enforce capital expenditures or replacement investments over the horizon of the planning period. Such capital expenditures would weigh down the company's cash flows and endanger the company's debt service.
page 148
In addition, a small operational leverage, i.e. small effects of regressive sales on the operating results, are of great importance. This can be achieved if the ratio of the fixed costs in relation to the total costs is relatively low. In this case, frequently the possibilities of outsourcing the none strategically relevant tasks is considered. Moreover, the minimization of the operational leverage contributes to gaining a bilateral (sales and purchases) pricing and negotiation power. This standing crucially contributes to the maintenance of the gross profit margin in difficult market conditions. In this context also the business size plays an important role.
Exit possibilities and increase in company value A substantial portion of the financial investors' demanded net yield with a LBO financing is generated by the increase in value and the exit potential. During the interest's maturity, cash flows are predominantly used for debt amortization and not for dividends. This is the reason that the exit (harvest potential) has a crucial role in the investment decision.
page 149
Only by the successful sale of the company, after years of successful increase in value, the financial investors and the management can obtain a risk-adjusted net yield on their paid-in capital. A suitable LBO target should therefore be interesting for a large number of potential investors (strategic and financial investors). The target often becomes a more attractive firm through improvements that result after the investors entrance. The possibility of going public (IPO) in the future is highly appreciated by investors. Besides the enterprise should exhibit rudiments for value-increasing measures discussed above, in order to maximize the exit profit. In practice it is observed that small and medium-sized enterprises, in saturated and less attractive markets with a missing unique selling proposition exhibit only non-lucrative exit scenarios. This is an additional reason for the underdeveloped LBO activity in this market segment.
page 150
Management A central success factor for a LBO is the managers, who lead and run the company. They must ensure that after the LBO financing, the planned cash-flows are obtained in order to be able to service the high debt level. They also must be in the position to make difficult and drastic decisions for the enterprise in critical situations. The ideal managers are very experienced and have already been active in a management function before or better worked as senior executive in the target company for many years. Further investors attach great importance to a functioning second management level in the enterprise. Family and owner-operated medium-sized enterprises are often deficient in this success factor.
page 151
Consequently, a LBO/MBO solution and the entrance of financial investors are not considered. According to a study of the "finance-magazine" and the "Deutsche Beteiligungs AG" in 2003, only 2% of all examined German MBOs are initiated by the old owner. Based on the same survey, 50% of the financial investors would grade the management quality of private companies only as satisfying. This result is backed by the fact, that after approximately one third of the LBOs the existing management was supplemented by new personnel both in the management and in the finance division.
page 152
Track record and firm ethics of financial investor Experienced and successful financial investors are typically the best partners for the management. Together with the management, they are supposed to positively support the development of the enterprise by the use of their know-how, their experiences, and their networks. Furthermore, they should always be a cooperative and (non-sparring) partner to the management. Particularly when problems and crises appear. But even in the case of further M&A transactions or in exit scenarios, to act in concert can contribute an important increase in value. An important factor for the success of a MBO is "chemistry" with one another and dealings based on partnership. Within the selection process of a financial investor its company and its investment and partnership philosophy should be exactly examined. In principal financial investors do not interfere into the operational business of a company, but the interfaces and duties should not be underestimated.
page 153
To mention some of these, one should consider a contemporary monthly or quarterly reporting, budget- and five-yearly planning and the active participation of the financial investor in supervision and/or advisory boards as well as with strategically relevant decisions. The investment and partnership philosophy of the financial investor as well as the appearance of investment managers and directors should play an additional role in the important decision process apart from purely monetary reasons and its track record. Business practice shows that trust and partnership cannot be fixed by contracts but based on inter-human relations and firm ethics.
page 154
Fair price Estimating the fair value of a company is a scientific and sometimes philosophical question, but the price of a company is finally the result of a negotiation trial. The suitability of a purchase price is often observed by noting whether it is eligible for financing or not. M&A practice indicates that the banks represent frequently a corrective element during the selling/purchase price calculation. In addition, a large number of transactions fail, in spite of a consensual purchase price agreement between buyer and seller, because of the fact that no bank agrees to finance the transaction. Therefore an important factor for success of each LBO is attached to the suitability of the purchase price and coherently the financing structure. In practice, the largest errors are often made during the purchase price stage. Within an auction process, in which an interesting enterprise is offered to several investors and a price competition is initiated, often, unreasonably high prices are paid.
page 155
Consequently, the failure of the financial investor and the management ("Winner Curse") is already pre-programmed. Interestingly enough, these purchase prices are nevertheless financed (often against better knowledge) by banks. The main reason is the fact that banks experience a high level of competition with other banks who also focus on interesting, lucrative, and prestigious acquisition financing projects. That is, often many banks compete (pitch) for an important transaction. A solid and plausible financial model, verified by a due diligence process, builds the crucial basis for the valuation of a company and an acquisition financing. Such financial models derive future cash flows, which are further used in company valuation methods and the evaluation of debt service ability. Here one always has to bear in mind the saying "garbage in - garbage out". The most common company valuation method in practice is the so called "Discounted Cash Flow" method (DCF method or DCF approach). The simultaneous use of sector specific multiples complements this valuation method in the sense of a plausibility-calculation.
page 156
For safeguard their interes, banks always contrive their own financial models from submitted business plans. By means of scenario analyses the outside capital structure is derived from banks together with the financial investor and the management. Here, the divergent interests between the parties must be reconsolidated. A too high level of indebtedness would mean a high (in extreme cases would threaten the existence of the firm) future burden for the enterprise and would further endanger the debt service for the financing banks. A too high equity ratio would again make the realisation of financial investors yield expectation (IRR) of 25%-30% per annum more difficult. From the financing perspective, there are clear boundaries, which should, as a rule not be exceeded.
page 157
Practical experiences show that in many cases the desired, purchase price relevant, yield improvements after the entrance of financial investors (cost savings, synergies etc.) can not be realized. Therefore an acquisition financing should be based on yield improvements, that are clearly predictable and comprehensible. Multiples based purchase prices of 8- 10x EBIT(A), which frequently appear with larger LBOs, should be equipped with very high equity capital, in order to avoid a too high outside capital encumbrance. This however again conflicts with the IRR expectations of financial investors, wherein again the problem of "overpaying" becomes clear. A too high of a purchase prices is always to the disadvantage of at least one or even all financing parties.
page 158
Fiscal Optimisation When structuring a LBO, the following elements are of central importance from a fiscal point of view:
exclusion of a recourse on financial investors (non recourse by interconnected NewCo) fiscal deductibility of interests paid on the acquisition loans ability to reckon up interest expenses with the returns of the target company (controlling- and result-payment contract in connection with a fiscal subsidiary) possible use of the loss carried forward by the target company conversion of prime costs to profit tax effective expenses (goodwill and asset step up) optimisation of the fiscal deductibility of equity capital loans (shareholder notes) reaching the border of fiscal admissibility (thin capitalization rules) removal of the disadvantages of a structural subordination direct access to the operative companies' cash-flows and their collaterals
page 159
Feasible and sustainable financing structure The goal of a feasible and sustainable financing structure is to ensure risk reconciliation between the parties involved. The finally implemented debt to equity ratio is determined by various interest priorities. Deviations from these limits of indebtedness can lead to the following consequences: companies' debts can only be served with difficulty; the compensation possibilities in the case of plan inconsistencies and/or the clearance for investments in fixed assets and working capital becomes bounded below if the debt service obligations can not be met, this entails an injury of the covenants and extensive consequences for the financing of LBOs
With the use of financing multiples always the same question arises - to which numbers these are to be referred. Proceeding from a conservative approach we recommend the use of EBIT or EBIT(A). Financial investors however frequently use the clearly higher result before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) to justify a higher debt ratio (and thus to increase their own IRR).
page 160
The problem occurring with this proceeding consists of the fact that the debt of the acquisition financing has to be served from free cash flows and performance measures such as EBIT(A) or EBITDA represent only the auxiliary variables for a first structuring. Now, if EBITDA becomes related as base factor, the danger exists that a too high outside financing portion for the acquisition financing is obtained which cannot be sufficiently served by actual cash-flows afterwards.
page 161
Contents
1. 2. What is private equity all about? ...
European leveraged finance market One year pre- & post-crunch: Buyouts One year pre- & post-crunch: Leverage One year pre- & post-crunch: New Issuance Senior loan LBO volume Mezzanine volume LBO leverage ratios Rolling 3-month average purchase price multiples Margin development Rolling 3 month average equity contribution
page 162
0,4
0,5
0,4
40% 35% 30% 25% 34,3% 31,8% 33,8% 30,4% 33,6% 33,6%
2x
5%
0x
3Q 06 4Q 06 1Q 07 3Q 07 2Q 07 4Q 07 1Q 08 2Q 08
0%
06 06 07 07 07 07 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 08 2Q 08
Purchase Price/EBITDA
Fees/EBITDA
Reflects initial and secondary buyouts only; excludes recaps and refinancings
page 163
Leveraged Loans
8x
8x
LBOs
7x
7x
1,2 6x
1,0 1,0 1,4 1,2
0,7
5x
4x
4x
3x
5,5 5,2 4,4 4,1
2x
1x
1x
0x
1Q 08 2Q 07 3Q 06 4Q 06 1Q 07 3Q 07 4Q 07 2Q 08
0x
06 07 06 07 3Q 4Q 1Q 3Q 2Q 2Q 4Q 1Q 08 07 07 08
Senior Debt/EBITDA
Other Debt/EBITDA
Senior Debt/EBITDA
Other Debt/EBITDA
page 164
Loan Volume
80B 140
Deal Count
70B
120
10B
0B
4Q 06 1Q 07 3Q 06 2Q 07 1Q 08 2Q 08 3Q 07 4Q 07
0
3Q 06 1Q 07 2Q 07 4Q 06 3Q 07 1Q 08 2Q 08 4Q 07
LBO
Non-LBO
LBO
Non-LBO
LBO includes all sponsor-related activity, including buyouts, refinancings and recapitalizations.
page 165
120B
Deal Count: 20
280
12B
10B
8B
6B
4B
40
2B
0B 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Deal Count*
0B
Ju l-0 7 A ug -0 7 S ep -0 7 O ct -0 7 N ov -0 7 D ec -0 7 Ja n08 Fe b08 M ar -0 8 A pr -0 8 M ay -0 8 Ju n08
Reflects loan volume of any transaction where the issuer is owned by a private equity firm (includes buyouts, recaps, refinancings, etc)
page 166
5. Mezzanine Volume
Total volume in 2Q2008 was 3bn from 21 deals, significantly up on the previous quarter (1.3 billion from 18 deals). Year to date volumes are 4.3bn from 39 deals, significantly down on the first 6 months of 2007, which had 7.6bn from 75 deals Annual Volume
14B 160
2.100M
8B 80 6B
1.400M
Deal Count: 39
40
4B
700M
2B
00M
Deal Count*
page 167
The graph on the right, which is based on a rolling three month average, reflects the continuing impact of the credit crunch. Leverage multiples have decreased to 5.5x (1Q2008: 5.8x) from a peak of 7x in September 2007. In addition to lower leverage, sponsors are having to invest higher equity to complete deals.
6,0x
4,0x
2,0x
0,0x
06 02 05 01 06 03 04 07 08 M rz 04 01 02 03 05 07 04 01 02 03 05 05 04 01 02 03 06 M rz M rz M rz M rz M rz M rz Ju n M rz 07 Ju n Ju n Ju n Ju n Ju n Ju n D ez D ez D ez D ez D ez D ez Se p Se p Se p Se p Se p Se p Se p D ez Ju n 08 07 06
1st Lien/EBITDA
2nd Lien/EBITDA
Other Debt/EBITDA
Excludes Broadcasting, Cable & Telecom loans prior to 2002. Figures based on rolling average 3 month pro forma debt/EBITDA ratios. Figures exclude refinancings and recapitalizations.
page 168
2,0x
,0x
03 M rz 0 Ju 4 n0 Se 4 p04 D ec -0 4 M ar 30 .0 -05 6. 20 05 Se p 05 D ec -0 5 M ar -0 6 Ju n06 S ep -0 6 D ez 06 M rz 07 Ju n0 Se 7 p07 D ec -0 7 M ar -0 8 Ju n08 01 02 01 02 03 01 02 03 01 02 M rz M rz M rz Ju n Ju n D ez Ju n D ez Se p S ep S ep D ez 03
Fee / EBITDA
page 169
8. Margin Development
Margins have increased c.2040bps since the last quarter, reflecting the launch of post crunch deals. The margins for senior A tranches have remained reasonably steady for the last 3 months at E+260 (1Q2008:E+229) The margin for senior B and C tranches have also increased, ending 2Q2008 at E+316bps (1Q2008: 288bps) and E+371bps (1Q2008: E+333bps), respectively. No averages for second lien are available due to a lack of deals involving this instrument. Average Mezz margin at 2Q2008 was E+431 for the Cash pay and 548bps for the PIK element, with cash pay increasing roughly 22bps compared to the previous quarter.
E+600 E+575 E+550 E+525 E+500 E+475 E+450 E+425 E+400 E+375 E+350 E+325 E+300 E+275 E+250 E+225 E+200 E+175
5 4 4 5 4 04 05 04 04 -0 -0 -0 -0 l-0 vnnpar ar ay ay Ju Ja No Ja M M Se M M 5 6 6 05 06 05 -0 -0 l-0 vnpar ay Ju Ja No M Se M 8 6 7 7 8 7 07 06 06 08 07 07 -0 -0 -0 -0 l-0 l-0 vvnnppar ar ay ay Ju Ju Ja No Ja No M M Se Se M M
Figures based on rolling average 3 month average spreads. No data available for second lien for Q1/Q2 2008
page 170
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
M rz 0 Ju 1 n 0 Se 1 p 0 D 1 ez 0 M 1 rz 0 Ju 2 n 0 Se 2 p 0 D 2 ez 0 M 2 rz 0 Ju 3 n 0 Se 3 p 0 D 3 ez 0 M 3 ar -0 Ju 4 nSe 04 p0 D 4 ec -0 M 4 ar -0 Ju 5 n0 Se 5 p 0 D 5 ec -0 M 5 ar -0 Ju 6 nSe 06 p0 D 6 ez 0 M 6 rz 0 Ju 7 nSe 07 p0 D 7 ec -0 M 7 ar -0 Ju 8 n08
Excluding Platform Acquisitions and Other Sponsor Driven Transactions. Equity includes ordinary equity, rollover equity and shareholder loans.
page 171