Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The Southern Literary Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1 (Fall, 1996), pp. 56-68 Published by: University of North Carolina Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20078169 . Accessed: 25/10/2012 21:20
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
University of North Carolina Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Southern Literary Journal.
http://www.jstor.org
"It's Not
Natural":
Freud's
who
think 92).
Given
of her
second to be Wise or at
against
these
in particular provide we
profit
least questioning, of reading O'Connor's Freud's may scious be, was as that
to do so will a supplement
important
otherwise
concerning
Freud. consistently O'Connor's anagogical on disparaged; true Other, terms record with in her indeed, Freud
approach Mellard to
James
the uncon
threatens
supplant opinion
ones.1 We
have O'Connor's
of Freud
Carnes M. Mellard argues that Freud is "the seductive yet threatening demon of [O'Connor's] toMellard, O'Connor fears Freud because her thought and her stories and novels." According readers can easily convert her theological terms into psychoanalytic ones, can substitute the unconscious unconscious" is the of "spirit." In other words, "the Other of her unconscious (628, Mellard's emphasis). Mellard does not focus on Wise Blood, however; after the above remarks, he goes on to apply Lacanian theory to O'Connor's work in general. for the domain
57
where
she speaks
that
sees
everything
"Freud
adequate
instrument
or the fiction
it" (Mystery
not Blood.
an
superlative
to understand subjectivities,
Blood's its
strange
and us an
Uncanny," both
also
offers
"grotesque" be problematic
categories (Mystery
unsatisfactory
I would
O'Connor if we do not
and
ofthe or
the novel,
as its power
allowing to disturb,
its mystery. O'Connor's note to the the novel second to be edition read. of Wise Earlier Bloodleaves readers, she little doubt as to had
how
she wanted
complained,
misunderstood:
the author
merely 44).
and Manners
followed saint to
arguing divine
of tortured hardest
toward
have
tried
shake
off O'Connor's
have
ended
58
O'Connor But
herself
who
becomes them
the those
"ragged Catholics
figure" who
readers?among by the
of so often
her
which
induces
through
anagogical
some
obvious
the
frequent
description
of
particularly
phlegm, the
violence,
little
motivation and
disturbing center
Catholic
readers
characters. strangeness religious and other. while as well who other in this as
reader's to murder
uneasiness. and
story
of an
obsessive
the body?his, irretrievably and letters as outside, in relation "wise," of blood, is not
a universe,
stand the
Cartesian inhabited to be
body
to be material,
or
run afoul an
in fact, of the
neither
nor
outside.
without
other
hurl
surface
violence,
subjects or lived?
including
the murder
and a living burial?is innocent man, multiple savage attacks, in a non-realist, almost horror exists of a novel whose component genre. Haze
into bestiality,
rises upward
into a desperate
spirituality" Where they have nevertheless readings have not been anagogical, In The Eternal Crossroads: The Art of Flannery O'Connor, Leon V. Driskell
to freedom, darkness to light. Ben read Wise Blood as a novel of passage, from confinement leave out in proposing what amounts to a New Critical approach that would Satterfield, author entirely and allow a non-anagogical reading, in effect keeps author at the center ofthe text: he regards O'Connor as a "failed propagandist" (48) but nevertheless assumes the same narrative inWise Blood as others have assumed.
FREUD
AND
O'CONNOR'S
WISE
BLOOD
59
that
questions?of
an
unmoored
subject,
of
violence be ad
conveniently influence
O'Connor of the
for whom
might
as the paradigm
uncanny?that To my
of Freud. O'Connor never (the familiar are embedded feelings and read Freud's essay and and "The the that The
Flannery that
Uncanny," unheimlich this mutual heimlich other, familiar From idea ers, ways. The
the heimlich
embeddedness
"uncanny."
is familiar (Freud
agreeable, thus,
224-25);
from Grimm's
the
secret;
signals,
while
it denies, heimlich
repressed of all,
content, unfamiliar
the
intra to the
uterine conscious Freud ries: 1. Doubts often alive 2. The psychic 3. The first
which but
is the most
place
remembered phenomena
uncanny
concerning by
between
and which
the
inanimate, to be
evoked or
appear
eye"?the
the
other's
gaze
can
inflict
projection unrecognized
ofthe
critical
gaze.
of desire
self, the construction by the conscious often a split ofthe self brought about by the point. by repetition (random recurrences, e.g. of
of a critical of experiences
destiny,
that
come
description in Wise
characters, us identify of
Emory.
analysis
of uncanniness, particularly
treatment
of the human
body,
60
body
is figured
as Other sitting
from across of a
scene, when Mrs. opening on the train, studies his face his skin was plain at the end of the novel: burned eye (231). tunnel, and "The
insistent"(10). outline seemed eyes Hazel's ness which is most indefinite Conventional suggests ible under that
the deep
into
tunnel
are a
worth
returning
along
imputed Freud
for home,"
is recognizable
curious for
as the memory forgotten two passages is the power article dictate in "the outline
of a skull The
diction something
would
besides and
have should
been be
skin
that over
eerie
comic view of
in this the by
elements subject,
implicit
to the
as,
in effect,
inanimate
or animated
non-subject.
to emerge
Enoch on
him
(99-100).
heightens. Driven by his blood, Enoch "finds himself doing this or that, like
a bird finds itself building a nest when it hasn't actually been planning to"
(129). His blood "wrote doom all through him" (129); "his blood was in secret
conference who not cleans going with up itself" the house up with (134); after any "his blood the company like was has rushing come" around (134); like a woman was ... was "his blood
to put
attitude
this"
(135);
"his mind
chasing around after his blood, like a boy with amop and a bucket" (135). And
his tongue, "which edges out every few minutes to test his fever blister, knew
Blood
brook with to assess
no disobedience. a power
the world,
its vehicle. view the and gains "fallen" God a world but lucidity as one that subject preserves has suffered and body. a
context,
human Blood
between which
Understood
its mystery.
61
repeatedly, Hazel's
were to grip
dolls him
or as if like a
the bars of its cage" (60). At another, Mrs. Flood ape clutching "thought of her own head as a switchbox where she controlled from" stolen (218). The homunculus, window, man which Hazel later smashes against noises. a door Gonga, who by Hoover dressed and hurls out a the a
to make is thought human by Enoch not only for Enoch is a figure inside but will be called) inside. The Hazel clone, named At is dead.
for Hazel,
fractured might to
constructed "Solace,"
(what
a spare human
speak
operator. Hazel
Flood
cannot
inanimate,
ofthe
uncanny
which
Freud novel,
discusses is full
is that ofthe
eye
essay,
like O'Connor's
of references
to eyes:
loss of eyes (children's tales ofthe fears ofthe "Sandman," impairments, comes to tear them out), anecdotes who for example, about being lost in a fog or most in a dark to that visual references room, and, trapped importantly, on the part ofthe Other as the "evil known evil power eye." The dread ofthe eye, of a point of view with (240). the power to do psychic harm, projected the animals, but waiting is always outward. who both all day for look" stops, sees a
says Freud
vantage with
envy
do nothing
sit there
stink").
their
gaze:
evil-eyed evil
(93). After
"a slanted
Haze the zoo, Hazel through to be an empty cage. But Enoch ofthe floor ofthe that close open. cage
corner
an eye. The piece saw that directly "I AM Enoch's explain: things and of mop
rag. He with
It was
looking
Motes.
clean,"
Hazel
to the eye.
them
(95). At
that moment,
senses a
thinks,
"He's
done murdered
62
The
fear
of
the of
animal the
is of gaze.
of down
the
fear
the first
he says to give
opens
the door
is "I thought if your some of it," to which should and Hazel's gaze, have
girl wanted
Sabbath
flees He until
"It was you the daughter replies, . . . looked me Hazel (108). When up and down" Papa to in the country, have an outing Sabbath much begins, to to avoid unable her Hazel, play peek-a-boo. finally
eyes of their
into
her
neck. almost
she but
lowered still
her
head look
noses said
he didn't
she
in a playful violently.
jumping
complicated,
by
redundant. often On
Hazel's Sabbath
of pecan
Hawkes eyes on
her
looking
him, end,
Hazel's Mrs.
bullet
back any
and bottom
forth
worrying and
about of
of his
eyes without
in them
the blindness
the
as
are set "so deep (10). to try Flood, tunnel Indeed, to see Hazel's where the
Hitchcock them.
now
sightless
Flood,
of view shapes
of the novel,
and whose
commentary
perception
of the novel,
closely
shut
her
eyes
and
saw
the pin
point
of light
but
so far away
that
she
could not hold it steady in her mind. She felt as if shewere blocked
at the entrance of something. She sat staring with her eyes shut, into
to the beginning
farther he was until
of
and the
ascension.
entirely exploiting
Flood's, to
before
adoring
mystifying
whatever insight? her power closing of
him ("this head big enough to include the sky and planets and
was or had been {getting] eyes, and or would be" [218]). Her moment of sight with and ever or of "finally of her inability to the beginning of O'Connor's It earlier is doubtful he proposes of something"? theme of comes the virtue Motes
that Hazel
experiences of blindness
tells Mrs.
Flood,
"If there's
work,
agency "in
exteriorized of being
pathological double
delusions on (e.g.
idea ofthe
the other,
or crimes),
famous
Woods" Must
each ofthe
Rises
two women?one
one white,
wearing
the same
hat?leaves
his double,
spectator's relevance,
Solace
twins?"
don't hunt it down and kill it, it'll hunt you down and kill you" (168). Just
moments conscience before Solace's and appearance, that Haze best had get been it out preaching in the open that and "your bunt is a trick," "you had
64
than
your is the
face
"face forces
in the mirror"?whom
he kills.
runs Solace's
him
resemblance, He backs
and
to strip off the clothes, are the chief feature which as Solace him down with tries to escape, knocks then, the body for good measure, leans over Solace's head, which seems and to be a dying revulsion: (205). breathing, then walks lies back
to see of blood,
victim hears
of what of interest
confession,
in a puddle to which
"You He
to hear he
bumper,
to town. Haze for Jesus. before is the too hunts down too and longs kills, O'Connor ("You alone Haze Solace suggests, believe not is his in Jesus," sentence
The
"it" which
repressed longing accuses him Haze him to death. content replica, Haze's It
Solace
him), Solace
would which
resembles Moreover,
comfort.
whose
conscious
reflects
(Asals
27). He
is "aman The
that ain't
is" (204),
of a man
concerning
the difference
human
non-human. start early in Wise Blood. Haze had wanted because to mock the two of who to be a face (22). boys to him the true"
murderous
doubles
in fact disliked who like his grandfather, preacher was in the child's and almost exactly repeated of two mirroring is the recurrent There appearance at the pool, the two the attendants two identical, of the at the parking blonde, the two obese
Haze seemed
figures: lot,
the pairs
Haze's dying. former and But Enoch secular necessary. images with
is the double "truly" what developed country and blind, is." double
"blind"
becoming
latter,
like Solace,
aman
is Enoch
Emory.
Both
and are as by
friendless
boys
utilitarians;
prominently, he works
Enoch final
as a
65
gorilla. Haze's
who
all of you at him, (99). The the Haze's to know, subdue wisdom. The doubles. the split extreme
[58])
the "wise blood," the instinctivism, opposite either verbally abuses Enoch, ("I seen repeatedly a stack of once tracts or physically, by hurling religious a rock at his head him onto the ground and throwing claims Haze repression ofthe physical by the mental down and prefigures killing of
of this
violence Solace. As
in the hunting
or refuses cannot know, the subject as exterior cannot cannot its interior, know "blood" or "conscience" or instinct/
interior
of
repetition,
in one forms
of of a
In Wise
within
of many on
a sense who
the un
and
incidental no
they recurrences
attach
with but
the number
sixty-two
importance, or to finding
he says, that
at which the point they a cloakroom to receiving our ship cabin bears that
if two we day,
such come
each the
or ifwe
same
particularly, fountain
sort Enoch,
of
repetition and
presents
which
inanimate,
repeating
everywhere
Enoch
fountain
pink
and green
marble
linoleum
green
behind
of a Lime-Cherry
they . . . (136)
resembled
66
are
fundamentally of
instances temporal
in space,
but of
Freud
also
uncanniness to?as
returns
of efforts
Blood We first
and disturbs and dreams about bat, dart closing to be from all and after have
of coffins. interred
family
sees his mother, but takes it was her cannot stall, reveal
of there, then
place
in the
help narrow
returning room,
to one
beyond
element alive
in Freud's by mistake
some
people
thing
terrifying
less explicit
dreams, the
where
of the museum, him "yawning Haze's that box, option he is "he for the
outside
him"
(186)?all
frighten is undercut
with by
uncanny
familiarity. realization
is nowhere not
to go. gaining
Even
itself
(207); Haze
destroys
"He'll critics he
spiritually,
accurately as many
considers
emerges ideas,
himself (see note 1), or transforming through suggested to be his the absence of "truth," regarding insights than his His from his limitations. fears, more revealing all inform world. an uncanny?feature o?Wise Blood is the fact seems that all of him that he is inescapably contained, buried
novel
in an alien curious?indeed,
physical
has
to represent at the
have stories.
revulsion speaks
to Haze,
behavior,
"it's not
normal"
Earlier,
she begins
to know
67
become person
fascinated have
for wanting
a sane reason could she queries, "What possible by Haze, . . ?" (211). to not enjoy himself. Haze's Protesting she becomes specific, and the ensuing dialogue may be read
reader
and writer: it's something that people have stories, a saint or in oil or being up cats," boiling walling no reason for it. it." have quit doing People gory it as long up cats" as I'm doing Flood letters, it," he said. (224) of Poe, Frederick an
of them
"There's
ain't
quit
doing
to "walling O'Connor
antecedent
which
repudiated
Asals has followed up in some detail (Asals 24-29). Mrs. Flood's objection to
the anachronism keep on "doing of the uncanny it." following because Augustine, it is Other; is, for the physical, for the the however reader, deformed as for by the It is, is answered by the resolve of the author to
as much
same once
reason, sameness,
repulsive.
also uncanny
its otherness
was
its strangeness
disguising
If we rather Freud's also the
ask not
rather
proves
of what
in fiction?dolls in "reality,"
in supernatural
tales?would
says. However, as the writer he can even pretends increase to move his effect in the and
situation
is altered
as soon ...
of common
reality
multiply
about he
events
is in a sense
he deceives after
to give 250-51)
helps
us with
a central
of her
"realism."
"realist[s]
of distances"
and Manners
68
associating that
that designation
with
prophetic
Freud,
the writing
enough; Blood
if itwere form
itwould
would say perhaps, not be uncanny. component mind literary of uncanny in a passage and of the body, as
of Wise
ofthat
violence,
the uncanny
it its horror.
Indeterminacy
could
[she] to
keep
dark
chances about
is based,
on which the world of the presuppositions [she] writes or [she] can avoid and ingeniously any cunningly to the last. (Freud 251) on the information point
Works
Asals,
Cited
Frederick. Flannery O'Connor: The Imagination ofExtremity. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1982. to the Value of Faces: Wise Blood and the Limits of Ciuba, Gary M. "From Face Value Literalism." Modern Language Studies 19-3 (Summer 1989): 72-80. Leon V., 1971. and Joan T. Brittain. The Art of Flannery O'Connor. Lexington: UP of Kentucky,
Driskell,
"The 'Uncanny.'" The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Freud, Sigmund. Sigmund Freud vol. xvii (An Infantile Neurosis and OtherWorks). Trans. James Strachey. London: 1917-1919- 219-252. Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis, Wise Blood." Modern Critical Views: Flannery Lawson, Lewis. A. "The Perfect Deformity: O'Connor. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 1986. 30-41. American Mellard, James M. "Flannery O'Connor's Others: Freud, Lacan, and the Unconscious." Literature 61.4 O'Connor, York: -. (December 1989): 625-643 Flannery. The Habit ofBeing: Letters ofFlannery O'Connor. Ed. Sally Fitzgerald. 1979 Farrar, Strauss, Giroux, New
Mystery and Manners: Occasional F rose. Ed. Sally and Robert Fitzgerald. New York: Farrar, 1970. Straus, Giroux, ?-. Wise Blood. New York: Noonday, 1962. of O'Connor Criticism." Satterfield, Ben. "Wise Blood, Artistic Anemia, and the Hemorrhaging Studies in American Fiction 17 (Spring 1989): 33-50.