Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Company Confidential
1 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Company Confidential
2 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
ScannerlLog
Always open *.dt1 & *.dt2, together with *.fs3 measurement data files. This would let the analyst have a sanity check if the radio environment is affecting both UEs or not e.g. Especially when trying to apply AdjsEcNoOffsets in cases of rapidly degrading CPICH Ec/No quality situations. And the scanner data would be used for missing neighbor detection, pilot pollutions and etc L1 optimization purposes. Always have the RNC Border MI layer opened in the map section. So that the Analyst would have a clear idea of the Inter-RNC SHO cases and in case SRNS relocation failures. Always work with L1 analyst to feedback / cross check with each other.
RNC Layer 1
Company Confidential
3 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Daily WBTS Block Cell States report from NMC (However, this only provides a static snapshot at the end of the day. Unless the BTS is down for whole day, this report does not show the site being down for a short duration due to whatever problem. Analyst is advised to check Daily BTS Alarm History report for such details) Daily BTS Alarm History reports from NMC
?...?
Company Confidential
4 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Company Confidential
5 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Company Confidential
6 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Company Confidential
7 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
SIB11
PLMN identities of neighboring cells to be considered in idle mode as well as in connected mode.
Company Confidential
9 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
PLMN Type
SIB Reference
Location Update(LU)
RRC Connection Stage Location Update Request Authentication Stage Location Update Accept RRC Connection Release
Company Confidential
10 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
AMR MOC
RRC Connection Setup
Authentication Procedure
Company Confidential
11 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
AMR MOC
UE
RRC_Connection_Request RRC_Connection_Setup RRC_Connection_Setup_Complete CM_Service_Request Authentication_Request Authentication Response Security_Mode_Command Security_Mode_Complete Setup Call_Proceeding
BTS
RNC
CS_CN
Company Confidential
12 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
MS R R C :R R C C O N NE C T IO N R EQ U E ST
BT S
RN C
C S_C N
Note: Authentication & Security Mode Procedures Are switched off in this Reference signalling flow
MS BTS RNC
Call established
AMR MOC
CS_CN
L1 synchronisation N BA P:SYN C H R O N IZ AT IO N IN D IC AT IO N RR C :C O N N E CT IO N SET U P C O M PLET E R R C :IN IT IAL D IR EC T T R AN SF E R (C M Service Request) R AN A P:IN IT IAL U E M ESS AG E (CM Service Request)
RRC: DOW NLINK DIRECT TRANSFER (Disconnect) RANAP: DIRECT TRANSFER (Disconnect)
RRC: UPLINK DIRECT TRANSFER (Release) RRC: DOW NLINK DIRECT TRANSFER (Release complete) RANAP: DIRECT TRANSFER (Release complete)
R AN AP: D IRE C T T R AN SF ER (C all Proceeding)
AAL2S IG : E C F AAL2SIG : E RQ
Call released
Company Confidential
13 2005 Nokia
MTC (AMR)
Company Confidential
14 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
MS
BTS
RNC
CS_CN
MTC
RANAP:PAG ING
NBAP:RADIO LINK SETUP RESPONSE AAL2SIG: ERQ AAL2SIG: ECF RRC:RRC CO NNECTION SETUP
Note: Authentication & Security Mode Procedures Are switched off in this Reference signalling flow
RANAP: DIRECT TRANSFER (Setup) RRC: DOW NLINK DIRECT TRANSFER (Setup)
RRC: UPLINK DIRECT TRANSFER (Call confirmed) RANAP: DIRECT TRANSFER (Call confirmed) RANAP:RAB ASSIGNMENT REQUEST
AAL2SIG: ERQ
AAL2SIG : ECF AAL2SIG: ERQ AAL2SIG : ECF NBAP:RADIO LINK RECONFIG URATION COMMIT RRC: RADIO BEARER SETUP
RANAP:RAB ASSIGNMENT RESPONSE RRC: UPLINK DIRECT TRANSFER (Alerting) RANAP: DIRECT TRANSFER (Alerting) RANAP: DIRECT TRANSFER RRC: DOW NLINK DIRECT TRANSFER (Connect) (Connect)
Company Confidential
Call established
15
2005 Nokia
PS DATA CALL
RRC Connection Setup
PDP Context Activation & Radio Bearer Setup Procedure Radio Bearer Reconfiguration PDP Context Deactivation Procedure Detach & Radio Bearer Release Procedure RRC Connection Release
Company Confidential
16 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
PS DATA CALL
UE
RRC_Connection_Request RRC_Connection_Setup RRC_Connection_Setup_Complete
BTS
RNC
PS_CN
Attach_Request Authentication_n_Ciphering Request Authentication_n_Ciphering Response Security_Mode_Command Security_Mode_Complete Attach_Accept Attach_Complete Activate_PDP_Context_Request Radio_Bearer_Setup Radio_Bearer_Setup_Complete Activate_PDP_Context_Accept Radio_Bearer_Reconfiguration Radio_Bearer_Reconfiguration_Complete
Company Confidential
17 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
BTS
RNC
PS_CN
NBAP:RADIO LINK SETUP RESPONSE AAL2SIG: ERQ AAL2SIG: ECF RRC:RRC CONNECTION SETUP
PS DATA CALL
MS BTS RNC CS_CN
RANAP: DIRECT TRANSFER RRC: DOW NLINK DIRECT TRANSFER (Attach Accept) (Attach Accept)
NBAP:RL RECONFIG URATIO N PREPARE NBAP:RL RECONFIG URATIO N READY
RRC: DOW NLINK DIRECT TRANSFER (Attach Com plete) RANAP: DIRECT TRANSFER RRC: UPLINK DIRECT TRANSFER (SM :Activate PDP Context request) (Attach Com plete) RANAP: DIRECT TRANSFER (SM : Activate PDP Context request)
RRC: RADIO BEARER RELEASE RRC: DT (Deactivate PDP context accept) RANAP: DT (Deactivate PDP context accept)
RRC:RADIO BEARER RELEASE CO M PLETE RRC: DT(Detach request) RANAP: DT(Detach request)
RANAP: DIRECT TRANSFER (SM : Activate PDP Context accept) RRC: DOWNLINK DIRECT TRANSFER (SM : Activate PDP Context Accept)
NBAP:RL DELETION REQ UEST AAL2SIG: REL NBAP:RL DELETIO N RESPONSE AAL2SIG: RLC
AAL2SIG : REL
AAL2SIG : RLC RANAP: Iu Release Comm and RANAP: Iu Release Com plete
AAL2SIG: ERQ
RRC: RRC CO NNECTIO N RELEASE CO MPLETE
AAL2SIG: ECF NBAP:RADIO LINK RECONFIGURATION COM M IT RRC: TRANSPORT CHANNEL RECONFIGURATION RRC: TRANSPORT CHANNEL RECONFIGURATION COM PLETE
Company Confidential
Uplink and downlink data transfer
18
2005 Nokia
PS Disconnect
AMR
AMR Disconnect
Company Confidential
19 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
PS
SHO_e1a
UE BTS RNC
NBAP
NBAP: Radio Link Addition Response RRC: Active Set Update Request
Company Confidential
20 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
SHO_e1b
UE BTS RNC
Company Confidential
21 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
SHO_e1c
UE BTS RNC
Company Confidential
22 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Company Confidential
23 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Missing Neighbours
Description: Missing neighbours. Possible Cause: Human negligence . Poor NB planning. Street canyon effect that requires more than 2 tier NB planning etc.
Company Confidential
24 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Prior to call drop, the Ec/No of SC233 became degraded due to interference from 12142 (SC302), which was not defined as a neighbour to 22750 (SC233). How do we know it is a case of missing neighbour? Just take a look at the
Company Confidential
25 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Question: How do we know it is a case of missing neighbour? Ans: Just take a look at the Ec/No of the Reselected Cell (12142 SC302) and you can observe that the Ec/No jumped from bad to very good.
Cell Reselection to 13184878 dec = C92F6E hex (RNC ID = C9 = 201, Cell ID = 2F6E = 12142 (SC302)
Company Confidential
26 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Fail Call Category: Category: Radio Related: 4 x RRC Connection Request with no response. Missing neighbour definition. Analysis: Analysis: 4 x RRC Connection Request with no response. After the last drop call (CAD #1), UE did not cell reselect to the best serving cell along that road due to missing neighbour definitions between 32897 (312) & 22835 (309). Solution proposed: proposed: Neighbour ADJS definitions: 32897 (312) 22835 (309).
Company Confidential
27 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Fail Call Category: Category: Radio Related: 4 x RRC Connection Request with no response. Missing neighbour definition. Analysis: Analysis: 4 x RRC Connection Request with no response. After the last drop call (CAD #1), UE did not cell reselect to the best serving cell along that road due to missing neighbour definitions between 32897 (312) & 22835 (309). Solution proposed: proposed: Neighbour ADJS definitions: 32897 (312) 22835 (309). RNC ID: 202 RNC ID: 202 Cell ID: 22835 Cell ID: 22835
Company Confidential
28 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: RF Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. Missing Neighbour definitions UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with No ASU response. Missing Neighbour definitions between 22552 (136) and 32873 (173).
Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Scanner Scanner ADJS definition: 22552 (136) 32873 (173) Redrive for verification.
Company Confidential
29 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: RF Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. Missing Neighbour definitions UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with No ASU response. Missing Neighbour definitions between 22552 (136) and 32873 (173).
Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Scanner Scanner ADJS definition: 22552 (136) 32873 (173) Redrive for verification.
Company Confidential
30 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Drop Call Category: Category: Site related: MR e1a with No ASU response. Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with No ASU response. Site 2335U was down on 23 Feb. See WBTS Cell Status report. Neighbour definition to provide as backup incase of site outage. Solution / Action proposed: proposed: NB Definitions: 12183 (156) 22545 (311) 22395 (151) 12350 (273)
Company Confidential
31 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Drop Call Category: Category: Site related: MR e1a with No ASU response. Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with No ASU response. Site 2335U was down on 23 Feb. See WBTS Cell Status report. Neighbour definition to provide as backup incase of site outage. Solution / Action proposed: proposed: NB Definitions: 12183 (156) 22545 (311) 22395 (151) 12350 (273)
Company Confidential
32 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP Problem seemed to start here. Problem seemed to start here. SC318 was not in SC318 was not in UEs NB List. MC did not UEs NB List. MC did not include SC318 although include SC318 although defined in 26009 (325) ADJS. defined in 26009 (325) ADJS. This caused unnecessary This caused unnecessary AS 325 having bad Ec/No AS 325 having bad Ec/No since SC318 was an since SC318 was an interferer. interferer. UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Drop Call Category: Category: UE related: MR e1a with No ASU response. Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with No ASU response. However, UE AS 26009 (333) was sending MR e1a to select the worst Ec/No SC in Monitored set instead of Ec/No Best Ec/No SC. Ec/No Subsequently, call was dropped due to UE bad AS SC Ec/No => high BLER. Ec/No Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Scanner Scanner Redrive for verification.
Company Confidential
33 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
RNTI_00003071.zip
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: UE related: MR e1a with No ASU response. UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with No ASU response. However, UE AS 26009 (333) was sending MR e1a to select the worst Ec/No SC in Monitored set instead of Ec/No Best Ec/No SC. Ec/No Subsequently, call was dropped due to UE bad AS SC Ec/No => high BLER. Ec/No Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Scanner Scanner Redrive for verification.
Company Confidential
34 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
No MR after Last MC
Description: UE did not perform any Measurement Reporting after last successful ASU + ASUC + Measurement Control sent, although the reporting criteria has been reached to perform MR e1a, e1b or e1c. Possible Cause: Since Soft Handover (Soft & Softer) is MEHO (Mobile Evaluated Handover), the decision to send MR is completely relying on UE when reporting criteria has been reached. Could only suggest that it is UE related problem.
Company Confidential
35 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: UE Related: No MR after last MC. UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: No MR after last MC. After last successful MR e1b with ASUC to remove intra-sector SC352 from AS, intrathe UE did not perform any subsequent MR (duration of approx >2mins drive) until call was dropped due to bad AS Ec/No. Ec/No.
Scanner Scanner
Company Confidential
36 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: UE Related: No MR after last MC. UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: No MR after last MC. After last successful MR e1b with ASUC to remove intra-sector SC352 from AS, intrathe UE did not perform any subsequent MR (duration of approx >2mins drive) until call was dropped due to bad AS Ec/No. Ec/No.
Scanner Scanner
Company Confidential
37 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
RSCP RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Radio Related: No MR after last MC. Analysis: Analysis:
Ec/No Ec/No
No MR after last MC. Due to street canyon effect, 32335 (169) is propagating up Fushing Road. This is not a missing neighbour. Suggest to neighbour. reduce CPICH Tx Power of 32335 (169). Problem could be resolved earlier, if we also ensure mutual faster SHO, AdjsEcNoOffset = 4dB is added mutually between 32713 (146) & 12324 (131).
Scanner Scanner
Solution proposed: proposed: Reduce 32335 (169) CPICH Tx Power from 33dBm to 30dBm. Mutual AdjsEcNoOffset: AdjsEcNoOffset: 32713 (146) 12324 (131) = 4dB
Company Confidential
38 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
05Apr13 124724_MRT_S2N_CS_PS_Nemo WCDMA Scanner (0)-CPICH_Scan_RSCP_For_SC_169 (dBm) ( Below -100.00 (0) ( >= -100.00 to < -93.00 (0) ( >= -93.00 to < -75.00 (53) ( Above -75.00 (125)
Company Confidential
39 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: UE Related: No MR after last MC. Analysis: Analysis: UE Ec/No UE Ec/No UE Related: No MR after last MC. Subsequently, AS (SC164) Ec/No Ec/No quality degraded, resulting in high BLER & call was dropped. This is UE related since for the SHO was successful for the concurrently running UE for PS FTP downloading. See next slide.
Scanner Scanner
Company Confidential
40 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
CAD #2-2 No MR after last MC (UE2: PS FTP => No Drop Call Encountered)
TMSI RNTI 00 08 D6 E3 RN23: 09 4F 7 (= 38135) RN24: 05 E6 5 (= 24165) Time_orig RNC_orig / CID (SC) RNC_drop / CID (SC) 13:54:26.467 RN23 / 12707 (159) RN24 / 22183 (164)
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: UE Related: No MR after last MC. Analysis: Analysis: UE Ec/No UE Ec/No UE Related: No MR after last MC. Subsequently, AS (SC164) Ec/No Ec/No quality degraded, resulting in high BLER & call was dropped. This is UE related since for the SHO was successful for the concurrently running UE for PS FTP downloading. Here, UE2 performing PS FTP downloading does not have any drop call. FTP Thruput FTP Thruput
Company Confidential
41 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: UE Related: No MR after last MC. Analysis: Analysis: UE Ec/No UE Ec/No UE Related: No MR after last MC. Subsequently, after approx 3 minutes of driving, UE AS (SC205) Ec/No quality Ec/No degraded, resulting in high BLER & call was dropped. This is UE related since for the SHO was successful for the concurrently running UE for PS FTP downloading. See next slide.
Scanner Scanner Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Redrive on 7 June for verification..
Company Confidential
42 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
CAD #4-2 No MR after last MC (UE2: PS FTP => No Drop Call Encountered)
TMSI RNTI 00 08 E2 13 RN21: 02 41 E (= 9246) RN23: 09 87 4 (= 39028) Time_orig RNC_orig / CID (SC) RNC_drop / CID (SC) 15:19:37.394 RN21 / 12188 (327) RN23 / 12518 (205)
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: UE Related: No MR after last MC. Analysis: Analysis: UE Ec/No UE Ec/No UE Related: No MR after last MC. Subsequently, after approx 3 minutes of driving, UE AS (SC205) Ec/No quality Ec/No degraded, resulting in high BLER & call was dropped. This is UE related since for the SHO was successful for the concurrently running UE for PS FTP downloading. Here, UE2 performing PS FTP downloading does not have any drop call. FTP Thruput FTP Thruput
Company Confidential
43 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop call category: UE related Analysis: UE was not sending any MR which caused the failure in the softer HO. As Ec/No of SC306 in the AS degraded, Ec/No and Ec/No of SC298 gets stronger in the Ec/No MS, call drop subsequently due to UE not sending MR. UE was hanged for almost 2 min., in which the softer HO should have performed.
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Scanner Scanner
Proposed solution
Company Confidential
44 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: UE Related: No MR after last MC. Analysis: Analysis: UE Ec/No UE Ec/No UE Related: No MR after last MC. Subsequently, AS (SC209,217,201) Ec/No quality degraded, resulting in Ec/No high BLER & call was dropped. However, in this case, UE did not perform optimum SHO. In the last MR+ASU, UE did not send MR e1a (208) which is the best monitored candidate cell. Subsequently, UE did not attempt MR e1c to replace AS with SC208, probably due to AS Ec/No quality Ec/No already bad.
Scanner Scanner
Company Confidential
45 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
This is a classic case of MR e1a with33 3 (= 4915) This is a classic case of MR e1a with No RNTI RN24: 01 No ASU Response that is NOT due to Network ASU Response that is NOT due to Network Time_orig 18:51:48.476 Problem but due to rapid changing RF Problem but due to rapid changing RF environment RNC_orig / CID (SC) RN24 / 32324 (147) (Ec/No quality). This can be environment (Ec/No quality). This can be (Ec/No RNC_drop / / (215) can be confirmed by CID (SC) RN23if 22712same can be confirmed by observing if the same observing the deep fade is experienced by the 2nd UE. deep fade is experienced by the 2nd UE. Which in this case it was. Which in this case it was. This can be optimized via Individual CPICH Drop Call Category: Category: This can be optimized via Individual CPICH Ec/No Offset to Related: MRthe SHO. No ASU Ec/No Offset RF advance the SHO. to advance e1a with Ec/No
response.
TMSI
00 07 DA BB
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with No ASU response. Observed the handover region between SC215 & 133 with rapid degradation of Ec/No quality of SC215, Ec/No due to position of sector 2 antenna and building obstructions. Propose to use ADJS CPICH Ec/No Ec/No Offset to mutually make SC215 & SC133 appear more favourable as SHO candidate.
Scanner Scanner
Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Mutually define: 22712 (215) 12700 (133) AdjsEcNoOffset = 6dB Redrive for verification.
Company Confidential
47 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: RF Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with No ASU response. Observed the handover region between SC215 & 133 with rapid degradation of Ec/No quality of SC215, Ec/No due to position of sector 2 antenna and building obstructions. Propose to use ADJS CPICH Ec/No Ec/No Offset to mutually make SC215 & SC133 appear more favourable as SHO candidate. Scanner Scanner Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Mutually define: 22712 (215) 12700 (133) AdjsEcNoOffset = 6dB Redrive for verification.
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Company Confidential
48 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Radio Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. Analysis: Analysis: Radio Related: MR e1a with No ASU response, possible due to AS (SC245) Ec/No quality degraded rapidly. Ec/No Possibly DL broken. Weak dominance stretch around Presidential Palace area. Difficulty in getting candidate sites. Try to create dominance using 22367 (234) by changing realtilt E-ADT from 6deg to 4deg. Scanner Scanner Solution / Action proposed: proposed: 22367 (234):
E-ADT = 6deg to 4deg
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Company Confidential
49 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Site Related: MR e1a with no ASU. Analysis: Analysis: UE Ec/No UE Ec/No MR e1a with no ASU response. Site 2151U was not transmitting on the day of drive (link problem). Check BTS alarm history of 4 Mar 05. In this case, 12151 (182) was not defined as neighbor with 36025 (340). As such, monitored NB list was non-optimum, resulting in MR e1a to nonother non-optimum MS cells. nonScanner Scanner Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Confirmed from BTS alarm history that site 2151U was down on day of drive. Possibly define: 36025 (340) 12520 (182) as a backup when 2151U is down. Redrive for verificationn when 2151U is transmitting again.
Company Confidential
50 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Network related: MR e1a with No ASU response. UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with No ASU response. The last successful MR e1b with ASUC to remove SC311 from AS => SRNC Reloc to RN24, did not receive any MC (possibly due to radio link lost) Subsequent MR e1a with no ASU response resulted in AS SC149 Ec/No Ec/No degraded and call was dropped due to high BLER. Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Site 2700U to be rehomed from RN24 to RN23 in Phase 2. Redrive for verification.
RNTI_00001FBA_0273.zip
Scanner Scanner
Company Confidential
51 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
RNTI_0000D47C_0175.zip
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Network related: MR e1a with No ASU response. UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with No ASU response. The last successful MR e1b with ASUC to remove SC311 from AS => SRNC Reloc to RN24, did not receive any MC (possibly due to radio link lost) Subsequent MR e1a with no ASU response resulted in AS SC149 Ec/No Ec/No degraded and call was dropped due to high BLER. Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Site 2700U to be rehomed from RN24 to RN23 in Phase 2. Redrive for verification.
Scanner Scanner
Company Confidential
52 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
13 Jan 2005
Drop Call Category: Category: Site Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. However, this is due to RN23 Site 2530U problem (as would be observed in the subsequent unsuccessful handover attempts to this cell. Analysis: Analysis: UE AS 32151 (197) sends MR e1a 12520 (182) with no ASU response. From MS, 12520 (182) RSCP & Ec/Nno quality was quite low. Current EADT of 12520 (182) & 22520 (190) is 8deg. Propose to uptilt 3deg to improve dominance & quality. Solution proposed: proposed: 12520 (182) & 22520 (190) EADT change from 8deg to 5deg. Redrive for verification on 14 Jan. No drop call.
Company Confidential
53 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Drop Call Category: Category: Site Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. However, this is due to RN23 Site 2530U problem (as would be observed in the subsequent unsuccessful handover attempts to this cell. Analysis: Analysis: UE AS 32151 (197) sends MR e1a 12520 (182) with no ASU response. From MS, 12520 (182) RSCP & Ec/Nno quality was quite low. Current EADT of 12520 (182) & 22520 (190) is 8deg. Propose to uptilt 3deg to improve dominance & quality. Solution proposed: proposed: 12520 (182) & 22520 (190) EADT change from 8deg to 5deg. Redrive for verification on 14 Jan. No drop call.
Company Confidential
54 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Drop Call Category: Category: Site Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. However, this is due to RN23 Site 2530U problem (as would be observed in the subsequent unsuccessful handover attempts to this cell. Analysis: Analysis: UE AS 32151 (197) sends MR e1a 12520 (182) with no ASU response. From MS, 12520 (182) RSCP & Ec/Nno quality was quite low. Current EADT of 12520 (182) & 22520 (190) is 8deg. Propose to uptilt 3deg to improve dominance & quality. Solution proposed: proposed: 12520 (182) & 22520 (190) EADT change from 8deg to 5deg. Redrive for verification on 14 Jan. No drop call.
Company Confidential
55 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: RF Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. Missing Neighbour definitions UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with No ASU response. Missing Neighbour definitions between 22552 (136) and 32873 (173).
Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Scanner Scanner ADJS definition: 22552 (136) 32873 (173) Redrive for verification.
Company Confidential
56 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: RF Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. Missing Neighbour definitions UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with No ASU response. Missing Neighbour definitions between 22552 (136) and 32873 (173).
Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Scanner Scanner ADJS definition: 22552 (136) 32873 (173) Redrive for verification.
Company Confidential
57 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: RF Related: MR e1c with No ASU response. UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: MR e1c with No ASU response. No coverage dominance along this stretch of highway. Dominance would be improved by optimizing electrical tilt of 12256 (159).
Scanner Scanner
Solution / Action proposed: proposed: To implement 12256 (159) E-ADT Euptilt of 2 degs to improve dominance along highway. Redrive for verification.
Company Confidential
58 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Network Related: MR e1a with no ASU response. UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with no ASU response. Network problem between MG21 & RN24/23, which started about this timing, caused all calls setups to fail after Call Proceeding, DL RRC Proceeding Connection Release.
Scanner Scanner
Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Troubleshooted realtime and resolved. Subsequent calls under RN23 & RN24 were successful.
Company Confidential
59 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Tool related: MR e1a with No ASU response. FMT Tool not responding / malfunctioned. Analysis: Analysis: Tool related: MR e1a with No ASU response. FMT Tool not responding / malfunctioned. As observed from trace, the flatliner of the measurement traces for BOTH UEs indicated that the FMT tool had stopped responding. responding. Scanner Scanner This drop call is not due to network problem. Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Redrive for verification.
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Company Confidential
60 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Drop Call Category: Category: Network Related: No MC after last ASU+ASUC, MR e1a with No ASU response. (Note: somehow, Uu log did not record the RRC Conn Setup RNTI for voice call (IMSI: 349), only for PS call (IMSI: 348 => 041E1)) Analysis: Analysis: No MC after last ASU+ASUC, MR e1a with No ASU response. Softer HO failure. However, in this case, UE did not perform optimum SHO. In the last MR+ASU, UE did not send MR e1a (softer 303) which is the best monitored candidate cell (see next slide). Subsequently, UE did not attempt MR e1a to add AS with SC303, probably due to AS Ec/No quality already bad. Ec/No Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Redrive for verification.
Scanner Scanner
Company Confidential
61 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Network Related: No MC after last ASU+ASUC, MR e1a with No ASU response. Analysis: Analysis: No MC after last ASU+ASUC, MR e1a with No ASU response. Softer HO failure. However, in this case, UE did not perform optimum SHO. In the last MR+ASU, UE did not send MR e1a (softer 303) which is the best monitored candidate cell (see next slide). => UE malfunctioned?? Subsequently, UE did not attempt MR e1a to add AS with SC303, probably due to AS Ec/No quality already bad. Ec/No Solution / Action proposed: proposed:
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Scanner Scanner
Company Confidential
62 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
CAD #1-1 MR e1a with No ASU Response (BTS / Radio) (02 June 2005)
TMSI RNTI 00 07 F0 93 RN21: 03 79 A (= 14234) RN24: 03 27 9 (= 12921) RN24: 03 28 7 (= 12935) Time_orig RNC_orig / CID (SC) RNC_drop / CID (SC) 14:47:39.503 RN21 / 12188 (327) RN24 / 32324 (147)
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: BTS Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. Analysis: Analysis: BTS Related: MR e1a with No ASU response, due to AS SC147 bad or rapid fading of Ec/No quality from approx 5dB Ec/No to 25dB. However, it was suspected that the BTS could have some problem at that instant, instead of the Nemo FMT & UE. In any case, would be checking the 2324U detailed BTS alarm history for 02 June to further investigate. Next slide showed same route driven on 01 June, no problem or drop call. Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Check 2324U detailed BTS alarm history for 02 June. WCDMA Cell Out of Use during the above aforesaid period. Redrive for verification.
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Scanner Scanner
Company Confidential
63 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
2324U_0602.log
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: BTS / Radio Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: BTS / Radio Related: MR e1a with No ASU response, due to AS SC147 bad or rapid fading of Ec/No quality from Ec/No approx 5dB to 25dB. However, it was suspected that the BTS could have some problem at that instant, instead of the Nemo FMT & UE. In any case, would be checking the 2324U detailed BTS alarm history for 02 June to further investigate. Next slide showed same route driven on 01 June, no problem or drop call. Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Check 2324U detailed BTS alarm history for 02 June. Redrive for verification.
Scanner Scanner
Company Confidential
64 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Radio Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. BTS Analysis: Analysis: Radio Related: MR e1a with No ASU response, possible due to AS (SC327) Ec/No quality degraded rapidly. Ec/No Possibly DL broken. Check BTS alarm history for 6012U on 3 June. Need to check RF coverage between 16012 & 26012.
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Scanner Scanner
Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Check BTS alarm history for 6012U on 3 June. Redrive on 6 June for verification..
Company Confidential
65 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Drop Call Category: Category: Radio Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. Analysis: Analysis:
Checking Alarm history of 6012U on 03 June 05 Reviewed that Site / all cells were indeed down at That exact time of driving through !!
Radio Related: MR e1a with No ASU response, possible due to AS (SC327) Ec/No quality degraded rapidly. Ec/No Possibly DL broken. Check BTS alarm history for 6012U on 3 June. Need to check RF coverage between 16012 & 26012.
Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Check BTS alarm history for 6012U on 3 June. Alarm history reviewed that Redrive on 6 June for verification..
Company Confidential
66 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Network Related: MR e1b with no ASU response. Analysis: Analysis: Network Related: MR e1b with no ASU response. Subsequently, call was dropped due to AS high BLER. This seemed to be specific UE related since for the SHO was successful for the concurrently running UE for PS FTP downloading. See next slide.
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
RRC_Mon_00008057_0CF0.zip
Company Confidential
67 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Network Related: MR e1b with no ASU response. Analysis: Analysis: Network Related: MR e1b with no ASU response. Subsequently, call was dropped due to AS high BLER. This seemed to be specific UE related since for the SHO was successful for the concurrently running UE for PS FTP downloading.
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
FTP Thruput FTP Thruput Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Redrive for verification..
Company Confidential
68 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Site Related: MR e1a with No ASU response. Site 8002U related. UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: MR e1a with No ASU response. This whole stretch of WenHwa Road is served by 28002 (259). However, on the day & period of drive, Site 8002U BTS alarm history indicated NBAP link failure and site failure was blocked due to LI (RNC time: LI 2.42pm~2.52pm). Call was dropped due to poor Ec/No. Ec/No.
Scanner Scanner
Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Investigate site bts alarm history. Redrive for verification.
Company Confidential
69 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Fail Call Category: Category: Site Related related: RRC Connection related: Reject with cause unspecified. unspecified UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: Site Related related: RRC Connection related: Reject with cause unspecified. unspecified However, on the day & period of drive, Site 8002U BTS alarm history indicated NBAP link failure and site failure was blocked due to LI (RNC time: LI 2.42pm~2.52pm) Scanner Scanner Site subsequently recovered around 2.52 and subsequent call attempt made on SC259 was successful. Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Redrive for verification.
Company Confidential
70 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Company Confidential
71 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Company Confidential
72 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Iu
RNC
Iu
RNC RNC
Iu
Iu
RNC
Intra-frequency hard Handover is lossless for NRT radio bearer but it causes short disconnection of RT radio bearer. Intra-frequency hard handover decisions made by the RNC are based on the intrafrequency measurement results, which are usually applied to the SHO procedure Also Enable Inter-RNC SHO parameter in intra-frequency HO path defines whether intra-frequency HO from the serving cell to a specified neighbour cells is performed as soft of hard Mobile evaluated Handover (MEHO) Company Confidential
73 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Iur
Iur
RNC may not be able to add/replace Ncell due to (a) Iur congestion or (b) inter-RNC SHO is prevented due to setting of EnableInterRNCsho (HOPS) (point1 on next slide) If CPICH EC/NO of non-active Ncell continues to increase it will cause additional interference due to a non-optimal connection (point 2) To avoid excessive uplink interference, RNC will perform an intra-frequency hard handover to the Ncell (CPICH3) if either of the following criteria are met (point 3); AveEcNoDownlink + HHOMarginAveEcNo < AveEcNoNcell EcNoDownlink + HHOMarginPeakEcNo < EcNONcell Parameters : Enable Inter-RNC Soft Handover HHO margin for Peak EcNo HH Margin for Company Confidential Average EcNo
74 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
( YES/NO, default = YES ) (-66 dB, default =2 dB) (-66 dB, default=1 dB)
3 2 Reporting range
HHOMarginAverageEcNo HHOMarginPeakEcNo
P CPICH 1
P CPICH 2
P CPICH 3 1 1A (AdditionTime = 0)
Company Confidential
75 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Time
AdditionReportingInterval
Company Confidential
76 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
RN27 RN27 Handover Category: Category: Iur Failure - Inter-RNC SRNC Relocation Interfailure => Triggering Inter-RNC, IntraInterIntraFrequency HHO. Analysis: Analysis: Iur failure was simulated / purposely disabled via blocking AAL2 User Plane, to invoke Inter-RNC, Intra-Frequency InterIntraHHO.
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Company Confidential
77 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
RN27 RN27 Handover Category: Category: Iur Failure - Inter-RNC SRNC Relocation Interfailure => Triggering Inter-RNC, IntraInterIntraFrequency HHO. Analysis: Analysis: Iur failure was simulated / purposely disabled via blocking AAL2 User Plane, to invoke Inter-RNC, Intra-Frequency InterIntraHHO.
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Company Confidential
78 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Problem Cause:
Error Alarm from MGW25 HST (54474) 2U4MG25 DISTUR ISU-0 ISU1205 USER PLANE CONNECTION SETUP FAILURE UCNPRB ISU-0 ISU01 02 14 49 20 63 20 6F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 1A002-00-3 1A002- 00COMM 2005-03-21 11:47:02.62 2005- 03-
Cause of Problem: Check PRFile and wrong setting for AAL2 Digit Analysis Tree settings PARAMETER CLASS: 7 CALL_CONTROL VALUE 0001 YES CHANGE POSSIBILITY
After changing value= 3 then working. PARAMETER CLASS: 7 CALL_CONTROL VALUE CHANGE POSSIBILITY YES
Company Confidential
79
Nokia 200500127
Company Confidential
80 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Iur Failure - Inter-RNC SRNC Relocation Interfailure => Triggering Inter-RNC, IntraInterIntraFrequency HHO. Analysis: Analysis: Iur failure was simulated / purposely disabled via blocking AAL2 User Plane, to invoke Inter-RNC, Intra-Frequency InterIntraHHO.
Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Scanner Scanner MR e1a with no MR e1a with no ASU Response ASU Response due to Iur due to Iur Failure Failure
Company Confidential
81 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Iur Failure - Inter-RNC SRNC Relocation Interfailure => Triggering Inter-RNC, IntraInterIntraFrequency HHO. Analysis: Analysis: Iur failure was simulated / purposely disabled via blocking AAL2 User Plane, to invoke Inter-RNC, Intra-Frequency InterIntraHHO.
Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Scanner Scanner Immediate AS SC Change from Immediate AS SC Change from RN23 12320 (301) to RN23 12320 (301) to RN21 22558 (305) RN21 22558 (305)
Company Confidential
82 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Company Confidential
83 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Network: DL RRC Connection Release after RB Reconfig Complete. UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: DL RRC Connection Release after RB Reconfig Complete. From ICSU log, transmissionNetwork : iu-transport-connection-failed-toiu- transport- connection- failed- toestablish.
Company Confidential
84 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Drop Call Category: Category: Network: DL RRC Connection Release after RB Reconfig Complete. UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: DL RRC Connection Release after RB Reconfig Complete. From ICSU log, transmissionNetwork : iu-transport-connection-failed-toiu- transport- connection- failed- toestablish.
Company Confidential
85 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Company Confidential
86 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Fail Call Category: Category: Radio Related: 4 x RRC Connection Request with no response. Missing neighbour definition. Analysis: Analysis: 4 x RRC Connection Request with no response. After the last drop call (CAD #1), UE did not cell reselect to the best serving cell along that road due to missing neighbour definitions between 32897 (312) & 22835 (309). Solution proposed: proposed: Neighbour ADJS definitions: 32897 (312) 22835 (309).
Company Confidential
87 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
Fail Call Category: Category: Radio Related: 4 x RRC Connection Request with no response. Missing neighbour definition. Analysis: Analysis: 4 x RRC Connection Request with no response. After the last drop call (CAD #1), UE did not cell reselect to the best serving cell along that road due to missing neighbour definitions between 32897 (312) & 22835 (309). Solution proposed: proposed: Neighbour ADJS definitions: 32897 (312) 22835 (309). RNC ID: 202 RNC ID: 202 Cell ID: 22835 Cell ID: 22835
Company Confidential
88 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Fail Call Category: Category: UE / Tool related: UL CM Service Abort due to Nemo CAA=15sec timed Abort out. Analysis: Analysis: UE / Tool related: UL CM Service Abort due to Nemo CAA=15sec timed Abort out. Call setup procedure was actually on-going. on As seen from Events window, that Nemo FMT sent CAA command but UE only sent RRC Connection Request Request almost 15secs later. Resulting in CAA timed out eventhough the call setup was on-going. Nemo FMT issued oncommand to UE to abort. Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Redrive for verification.
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Scanner Scanner
Company Confidential
89 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
CAF #2 UL CM Service Abort - Nemo CAA Call Attempt=15secs Timed-out Call Setup On-going
TMSI RNTI 2A 68 3F 03 RN22: 09 80 5 (= 38917) 16:41:13.800 RN22 / 22046 (259)
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Fail Call Category: Category: Tool related: UL CM Service Abort due to Nemo CAA attempt timed out after 15secs. Analysis: Analysis: Tool related: UL CM Service Abort due to Nemo CAA attempt timed out after 15secs. Call setup was actually onongoing. After last cAF under poor coverage area, UE was receiving BCCH of 22046 (not optimal cell). Nemo sent CAA but 1st RRC Connection Request was sent only 12secs later. Thus, while call setup was on-going, Nemo tool onCAA timer=15sec expired and call was aborted. Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Redrive for verification.
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Scanner Scanner
Company Confidential
90 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Fail Call Category: Category: Network related: 2 x RRC Connection Request with no Response. UE Ec/No UE Ec/No Analysis: Analysis: 2 x RRC Connection Request with no Response. Not a site problem since the subsequent call setup on 12044 (179) was successful. Note: Nemo PB does not count this as a Call Setup Failure (CAF). However, since the time duration from the 1st RRC Connection Request to the 3rd RRC Conn Req was >8secs, this would be interpreted as a CAF by Actix. Actix. Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Redrive for verification.
Scanner Scanner
Company Confidential
91 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim
CAF #1-#4 Call Setup Failed after Call Proceeding DL RRC Connection Release
UE RSCP UE RSCP
Fail Call Category: Category: Network related: Call setup failed after Call Proceeding DL RRC Connection Proceeding Release. Analysis: Analysis: Network problem between MG21 & RN24/23, which started about this timing, caused all calls setups to fail after Call Proceeding, DL RRC Proceeding Connection Release.
UE Ec/No UE Ec/No
Scanner Scanner
Solution / Action proposed: proposed: Troubleshooted realtime and resolved. Subsequent calls under RN23 & RN24 were successful.
Company Confidential
92 2005 Nokia Nemo_L3_Analysis_v01.ppt/ 2005.11.05 / rlim