Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

Friday,

May 18, 2001

Part III

Department of
Education
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services; Special
Education—Technology and Media
Services for Individuals With Disabilities
Program; Notice

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 17:20 May 17, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\18MYN2.SGM pfrm10 PsN: 18MYN2
27802 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 97 / Friday, May 18, 2001 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (e) Part III of each application submit a grant application in electronic
submitted under a priority in this or paper format.
Office of Special Education and notice, the application narrative, is • You can submit all documents
Rehabilitative Services; Special where an applicant addresses the electronically, including the
Education—Technology and Media selection criteria that are used by Application for Federal Assistance (ED
Services for Individuals With reviewers in evaluating the application. 424), Budget Information—Non-
Disabilities Program You must limit Part III to the equivalent Construction Programs (ED 524), and all
of no more than the number of pages necessary assurances and certifications.
AGENCY:Department of Education. • Fax a signed copy of the
listed in the table at the end of this
Notice inviting applications for
ACTION: Application for Federal Assistance (ED
notice for each applicable priority, using
new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2001. 424) after following these steps:
the following standards:
SUMMARY: This notice provides closing • A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ × 11″ (on one side 1. Print ED 424 from the e-
dates and other information regarding only) with one-inch margins (top, APPLICATION system.
bottom, and sides). 2. Make sure that the institution’s
the transmittal of applications for two
FY 2001 competitions under one • Double-space (no more than three Authorizing Representative signs this
lines per vertical inch) all text in the form.
program authorized by the Individuals
application narrative, including titles, 3. Before faxing this form, submit
with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA),
headings, footnotes, quotations, and your electronic application via the e-
as amended: Special Education—
captions, as well as all text in charts, APPLICATION system. You will receive
Technology and Media Services for
tables, figures, and graphs. an automatic acknowledgement, which
Individuals with Disabilities.
• If using a proportional computer will include a PR/Award number (an
National Education Goals font, use no smaller than a 12-point identifying number unique to your
The eight National Education Goals font, and an average character density application).
focus the Nation’s education reform no greater than 18 characters per inch. 4. Place the PR/Award number in the
efforts and provide a framework for If using a nonproportional font or a upper right hand corner of ED 424.
improving teaching and learning. typewriter, do not use more than 12 5. Fax ED 424 to the Application
This priority addresses the National characters per inch. Control Center within three working
Education Goals that promote new The page limit does not apply to Part days of submitting your electronic
partnerships to strengthen schools and I, the cover sheet; Part II, the budget application. We will indicate a fax
expand the Department’s capacities for section, including the narrative budget number in e-APPLICATION at the time
helping communities to exchange ideas justification; Part IV, the assurances and of your submission.
and obtain information needed to certifications; or the one-page abstract, • We may request that you give us
achieve the goals. the resumes, the bibliography or original signatures on all other forms at
These priorities would address the references, or the letters of support. a later date.
National Education Goals by helping to However, you must include all of the You may access the electronic grant
improve results for children with application narrative in Part III. application for the program at: http://e-
disabilities. We will reject without consideration grants.ed.gov
or evaluation any application if— We have included additional
Waiver of Rulemaking • You apply these standards and information about the e-APPLICATION
It is generally our practice to offer exceed the page limit; or pilot project (see Parity Guidelines
interested parties the opportunity to • You apply other standards and between Paper and Electronic
comment on proposed priorities. exceed the equivalent of the page limit. Applications) in the application
However, section 661(e)(2) of IDEA package.
Pilot Project for Electronic Submission Note: Some of the procedures in these
makes the Administrative Procedure Act of Applications
(5 U.S.C. 553) inapplicable to the instructions for transmitting applications
priorities in this notice. The U.S. Department of Education is differ from those in the Education
expanding its pilot project of electronic Department General Administrative
General Requirements submission of applications. The Regulations (EDGAR) (34 CFR 75.102). Under
the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
(a) The projects funded under this program in this announcement is 553) the Department generally offers
notice must make positive efforts to included in the pilot project. If you are interested parties the opportunity to
employ and advance in employment an applicant for a grant under this 2 comment. However, these amendments make
qualified individuals with disabilities in program, you may submit your procedural changes only and do not establish
project activities (see section 606 of application to us in either electronic or new substantive policy. Therefore, under 5
IDEA). paper format. U.S.C. 553(b)(A), the Secretary has
(b) Applicants and grant recipients The pilot project involves the use of determined that proposed rulemaking is not
funded under this notice must involve the Electronic Grant Application System required.
individuals with disabilities or parents (e-APPLICATION, formerly e-GAPS)
Technology and Media Services for
of individuals with disabilities in portion of the Grant Administration and
Individuals With Disabilities (CFDA
planning, implementing, and evaluating Payment System (GAPS). We request
84.327)
the projects (see section 661(f)(1)(A) of your participation in this pilot project.
IDEA). We shall continue to evaluate its Purpose of Program: The purpose of
(c) The projects funded under these success and solicit suggestions for this program is to promote the
priorities must budget for a two-day improvement. development, demonstration, and
Project Directors’ meeting in If you participate in this e- utilization of technology and to support
Washington, DC during each year of the APPLICATION pilot, please note the educational media activities designed to
project. following: be of educational value to children with
(d) In a single application, an • Your participation is voluntary. disabilities. This program also provides
applicant must address only one • You will not receive any additional support for some captioning, video
absolute priority in this notice. point value or penalty because you description, and cultural activities.

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 15:31 May 17, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MYN2.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 18MYN2
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 97 / Friday, May 18, 2001 / Notices 27803

Applicable Regulations: (a) The (a) Use an integrated approach that ‘‘General Requirements’’ section of this
Education Department General mixes children or adults who are deaf notice.
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in or hard-of-hearing with those who are
Absolute Priority 2—Center to Support
34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, hearing in carrying out project activities;
Technology Innovation for Students
85, 86, 97, 98, and 99; (b) The selection and
(b) Develop and implement strategies With Disabilities (84.327Z) Background
criteria for the priorities under this
program are drawn from the EDGAR that will increase public awareness and Technology can dramatically improve
general selection criteria menu. The understanding of deafness, deaf culture, early intervention and educational
specific selection criteria for each and of the artistic and intellectual results for infants, toddlers, and
priority are included in the funding achievements of deaf and hard-of- children with disabilities, whether it is
application packet for the applicable hearing individuals. Outreach activities designed specifically for use by
competition. such as promoting the project to individuals with disabilities, or for a
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 schools, community organizations, news general population and is accessible for
apply to institutions of higher education media, and relevant national individuals with disabilities.
only. organizations are encouraged. The Federal government has a number
Eligible Applicants: State and local of programs that may augment the
Invitational Priority benefits of technology for infants,
educational agencies; institutions of
higher education; other public agencies; Within this absolute priority, the toddlers, and children with disabilities.
private nonprofit organizations; outlying Secretary is particularly interested in For example, programs in the Office of
areas; freely associated States; Indian applications that meet the following Special Education Programs (OSEP) and
tribes or tribal organizations; and for- invitational priority. However, pursuant in the National Institute on Disability
profit organizations. to 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1), an application and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR)
that meets this invitational priority does support a range of technology
Priority not receive competitive or absolute innovation and implementation efforts
Under section 687 of IDEA and 34 preference over applications that do not focused on the needs of individuals
CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only meet this priority: with disabilities. Other Federal
applications that meet the following Projects that include people from a programs have the potential to provide
priorities: variety of cultural, racial, or ethnic support in this area as well. These
backgrounds. include, but are not limited to:
Absolute Priority 1—Cultural (a) Technology research and
Experiences for Deaf or Hard of Hearing Competitive Preference
innovation programs offered in other
Individuals (84.327T) Within this absolute priority, we will offices in the Department of Education
Background give the following competitive (e.g., Small Business Innovation
preference points under section 606 of Research);
Past projects funded under this IDEA and 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), to (b) The Access Board and the Federal
priority supported a variety of activities, applications that are otherwise eligible Information Technology Accessibility
including: theatrical experiences in for funding under this priority: Initiative (FITAI) that promote
which cast members included deaf, Up to ten (10) points based on the technology accessibility; and
hard-of-hearing, and hearing performers; effectiveness of the applicant’s strategies (c) Technology research,
theater and set design, directing, dance, for employing and advancing in development, and transfer programs
and storytelling; cultural experiences employment qualified individuals with operated by other Federal agencies (e.g.,
focusing on Native American art and disabilities in project activities as National Aeronautics and Space
culture; hands-on theatre experience required under paragraph (a) of the Administration, Department of Defense,
involving persons from minority groups; ‘‘General Requirements’’ section of this National Science Foundation).
a touring ‘‘instant theater;’’ producing notice. In determining the effectiveness Technology benefits can also be
videos of performances and of those strategies, we may consider the enhanced by federally-supported
documentaries of performances; and applicant’s past success in pursuit of technical assistance and dissemination
drama workshops. this goal. projects sponsored by OSEP (e.g.,
Therefore, for purposes of this Regional and Federal Resource Centers,
Priority
competitive preference, applicants can Partnership Projects, and the Center to
This priority supports a variety of be awarded up to a total of 10 points in Link Urban Schools (LINK US)), and
cultural activities designed to enrich the addition to those awarded under the other projects in the Department of
lives of deaf or hard-of-hearing published selection criteria for this Education (e.g., Regional Educational
individuals, children, or adults. These priority. That is, an applicant meeting Laboratories, ABLEDATA Database
activities must use an approach that this competitive preference could earn a Program).
integrates deaf or hard-of-hearing maximum total of 110 points. Non-Federal resources and efforts can
individuals with those who can hear, Project Period: Up to 36 months. affect the benefits that infants, toddlers,
while conducting cultural experiences Maximum Award: The maximum and children with disabilities derive
that will increase public awareness and award amount is $110,000 per year. from technology. These include, but are
understanding of deafness, deaf culture, Consistent with EDGAR 34 CFR not limited to:
and of the artistic and intellectual 75.104(b), we will reject any application (a) State and local policies (e.g.,
achievements of deaf and hard-of- that proposes a project funding level for technology acquisition standards,
hearing individuals. any year that exceeds the stated policies for program access);
A grantee may not use funds under maximum award amount for that year. (b) State and local programs and
this priority for passive activities, such Page Limits: The maximum page limit resources (e.g., technology programs and
as viewing a play or video or passively for this priority is 50 double-spaced personnel, including numerous
watching a storyteller or artist at work. pages. innovative technology efforts);
To be considered for funding under Note: Applications must meet the required (c) Teacher training and professional
this priority, a project must— page limit standards that are described in the development programs offered by State

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 15:31 May 17, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MYN2.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 18MYN2
27804 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 97 / Friday, May 18, 2001 / Notices

and local educational agencies and achieve better early intervention and appropriate. These activities must
institutions of higher education; educational results for infants, toddlers, include, but are not limited to:
(d) Efforts by professional groups and and children with disabilities by: (a) (1) Completing and disseminating one
trade associations (e.g., the Technology Cultivating a collaborative network; (b) to four syntheses of research and best
and Media Division of the Council for analyzing, synthesizing, and practice knowledge per year on topics
Exceptional Children, the Quality disseminating research-based and best related to the effective use of technology
Indicators for Assistive Technology practice information; (c) promoting the to achieve better results. The results of
(QIAT) Consortium, the Schools distribution and use as appropriate of these syntheses must be packaged in
Interoperability Framework (SIF) technology-related products and formats suitable for the target audiences,
sponsored by the Software and approaches with potential to improve as well as technology researchers and
Information Industry Association); results, including products and developers. Products must include a
(e) Technology products that are approaches developed with OSEP series of research briefs announced in
commercially developed and funding; and (d) analyzing needs, the newsletter and posted on the web
distributed; and issues, trends, and promising site.
(f) Public-private partnerships approaches. (2) Completing and disseminating at
focusing on technology (e.g., the IMS (a) The Center’s activities for least one video package per year
Global Learning Consortium and the cultivating a collaborative network must designed for use in teacher training,
federally-funded Specifications for include, but are not limited to: staff development, program
Accessible Learning Technologies (1) Developing and updating on a improvement, and similar efforts
(SALT) Partnership, the Center for regular basis a database of projects presenting research-based, and best-
Innovative Learning Technologies (including OSEP-funded projects), practice information on the use of
(CILT)). agencies, professional and trade technology to achieve better results.
In addition, general trends and associations, commercial companies, Each package must include one 15 to 20
developments in technology and minute video and supporting materials
and other organizations and entities as
instruction affect the benefits derived intended for target audiences as
discussed in the background section
from technology. These include, but are previously described.
that may contribute to the Center’s (3) Conducting technical assistance,
not limited to: efforts to improve the use of technology
(a) The development of faster, smaller, dissemination or training activities for
to achieve better results. This database target audiences. The Center must
and cheaper computers; is to be posted on the web site.
(b) Increased use of wireless conduct at least two of these activities
(2) Forming an advisory board of eight in the first year and at least four in each
communications;
to ten representatives with various subsequent year. These activities must
(c) Increased speed and capacity of
perspectives, and maintaining be conducted in collaboration with
the internet;
(d) Use of new information models communication with this board, other members of the network. The
(e.g., extensible markup language including convening an annual meeting activities may draw upon OSEP-
(XML)); in Washington, DC. The purpose of this sponsored projects and other sources,
(e) Increased use of special-purpose board is to review and comment at least including the materials developed by
and ‘‘ubiquitous’’ computers (e.g., annually on the Center’s plans and the Center. The activities must be
computers in appliances, TVs, and evaluation findings, and to provide designed to disseminate research-based
telephones); and additional advisory support as needed. and best practice information on using
(f) New technology-based Perspectives to be represented on the technology to achieve better results.
instructional approaches (e.g., distance advisory board must include, but are not (c) The Center’s activities for
learning, simulations). limited to: technology developers, promoting the distribution and use as
Clearly, the benefits that infants, technology researchers, Federal agencies appropriate of technology-related
toddlers, and children with disabilities and programs, commercial vendors, products and approaches with potential
can derive from technology are technical assistance providers, to improve results, including products
influenced by a number of programs, personnel preparation programs, and approaches developed with OSEP
policies, resources, professional teachers and other service providers, funding, must include, but are not
activities, trends, and other factors. It persons with disabilities who use limited to:
would be useful if all of these factors technology, and parents of children (1) Maintaining a listing of
collectively contributed to maximizing with disabilities. commercial and noncommercial
the benefits of technology for this (3) Developing and implementing resources for disseminating findings and
population of children. procedures to collect information on products of technology projects, and
However, such an outcome cannot be relevant activities of the entities including these resources in the
assumed. Technology innovations will identified in paragraph (1). network.
not result in widespread benefits unless (4) Distributing a quarterly e-mail (2) Providing technical assistance and
they are disseminated effectively. newsletter (with links to the web site) training for developers of technology-
Commercially developed products may describing the activities of the Center related products and approaches on
not benefit infants, toddlers, and and of other members of the network, developing high quality and marketable
children with disabilities unless they including the activities of OSEP-funded products, and finding dissemination or
are designed to meet their needs. projects, in improving the use of marketing resources. This technical
Special education researchers and technology to achieve better results. assistance and training may be delivered
technology developers cannot draw (b) The Center’s activities for in conjunction with the annual meeting
upon technology innovations and trends analyzing, synthesizing, and on technology and infants, toddlers and
of which they are unaware. disseminating research-based and best children with disabilities described in
practice information must be targeted to this priority.
Priority audiences of practitioners, (3) Including information about
This priority will support a Center to administrators, policymakers, parents, technology-related products and
improve the use of technology to children, and other audiences as approaches with potential to improve

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 15:31 May 17, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MYN2.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 18MYN2
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 97 / Friday, May 18, 2001 / Notices 27805

results in the newsletter, and providing (e) Submit quarterly reports funding level for any year that exceeds
follow-up information to potential describing and documenting Center the stated maximum award amount for
dissemination or marketing resources. activities, including results of the that year.
(d) The Center’s activities for evaluation activities described in the Page Limits: The maximum page limit
analyzing needs, issues, trends, and previous paragraph. for this priority is 60 double-spaced
promising approaches must include, but Accessibility: All products developed pages.
are not limited to: by the Center must conform to relevant Note: Applications must meet the required
(1) Annually convening from one to standards of accessibility, including page limit standards that are described in the
four consensus panels of experts to captioning all videos and providing ‘‘General Requirements’’ section of this
focus on specific needs, issues, trends, alternative formats for written materials. notice.
and promising approaches, and produce Competitive Preferences For Applications Contact: Education
documents describing implications for Publications Center (ED Pubs), P.O. Box
using technology to achieve better Within this absolute priority, we will 1398, Jessup, Maryland 20794–1398.
results. Consensus panels may involve award the following competitive Telephone (toll free): 1–877–4ED–Pubs
preparation of background papers prior preference points under section 606 of (1–877–433–7827). FAX: 301–470–1244.
to meetings. The Center must post all IDEA and 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), to Individuals who use a
background papers and the products of applications that are otherwise eligible telecommunications device for the deaf
consensus panels on the web site. for funding under this priority: (TDD) may call (toll free) 1–877–576–
(2) Maintaining ongoing collection of Up to ten (10) points based on the 7734.
information on developments in effectiveness of the applicant’s strategies You may also contact Ed Pubs via its
government, private industry, early for employing and advancing in Web site (http://www.ed.gov/pubs/
intervention, education, and similar employment qualified individuals with edpubs.html) or its E-mail address
arenas relevant to needs, issues, trends, disabilities in project activities as (edpubs@inet.ed.gov).
and promising approaches. This required under paragraph (a) of the If you request an application from ED
information must be reported in the ‘‘General Requirements’’ section of this Pubs, be sure to identify these
newsletter and on the web site. notice. In determining the effectiveness competitions as follows: CFDA 84.327T
of those strategies, we may consider the and CFDA 84.327Z.
In addition to, and supportive of the
applicant’s past success in pursuit of
activities listed previously, the Center FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
this goal.
must do all of the following: Grants and Contracts Services Team,
Therefore, for purposes of this
(a) Maintain a web site that includes: competitive preference, applicants can U.S. Department of Education, 400
The network database, on-line be awarded up to a total of 10 points in Maryland Avenue, S.W., room 3317,
documents and products of the Center addition to those awarded under the Switzer Building, Washington, D.C.
activities, on-line descriptions of published selection criteria for this 20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 260–
products developed by OSERS-funded priority. That is, an applicant meeting 9182.
projects, links to web resources this competitive preference could earn a If you use a TDD you may call the
(including all web sites maintained by maximum total of 110 points. Federal Information Relay Service
OSERS-funded projects involved in Project Period: Under this priority, we (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339.
technology innovation), articles linked will make one award for a cooperative Individuals with disabilities may
to the newsletter, and discussion agreement for a project period of up to obtain this document in an alternative
groups. This web site must conform to 60 months subject to the requirements format (e.g., Braille, large print,
all relevant standards regarding of 34 CFR 75.253(a) for continuation audiotape, or computer diskette) on
accessibility. awards. In deciding whether to continue request to the contact persons listed in
(b) Conduct an annual meeting in the Center for the fourth and fifth years, the preceding paragraph.
Washington DC on technology and we will consider the requirements of 34 Individuals with disabilities may
infants, toddlers, and children with CFR 75.253(a), and in addition— obtain a copy of the application package
disabilities. This meeting must include (a) The recommendation of a review in an alternative format by contacting
approximately 110 directors of OSEP- team consisting of experts selected by the Department as listed above.
sponsored projects involved in the Secretary, which review will be However, the Department is not able to
technology innovations, and 20 other conducted during the last half of the reproduce in an alternative format the
local participants representing Federal project’s second year in Washington DC. standard forms included in the
agencies, professional groups, etc. The Projects must budget for travel application package.
Center must pay for travel and lodging associated with this review;
for an estimate of 85 project directors Intergovernmental Review
(b) The timeliness and effectiveness
(the remaining participants are local or with which all requirements of the This notice is subject to the
will pay for their travel with their own negotiated cooperative agreement have requirements of Executive Order 12372
project funds). The conference must been or are being met by the Center; and and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
include a demonstration event of OSEP- (c) The degree to which the Center is The objective of the Executive order is
supported technologies. making a positive contribution to to foster an intergovernmental
(c) Meet with OSEP staff during the improving the use of technology to partnership and a strengthened
first month of each project year to achieve better results for infants, federalism by relying on processes
discuss and obtain approval for plans toddlers, and children with disabilities. developed by State and local
for the year. Maximum Award: The maximum governments for coordination and
(d) Conduct project evaluation award amount is $750,000 for the first review of proposed Federal financial
activities to ascertain the quality of the budget period of 12 months and assistance.
Center’s activities and products, and to $1,000,000 for subsequent budget In accordance with the order, we
determine the Center’s progress toward periods of 12 months. Consistent with intend this document to provide early
improving the use of technology to EDGAR 34 CFR 75.104(b), we will reject notification of the Department’s specific
achieve better results. any application that proposes a budget plans and actions for those programs.

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 15:31 May 17, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MYN2.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 18MYN2
27806 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 97 / Friday, May 18, 2001 / Notices

INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT APPLICATION NOTICE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001
Deadline for Maximum Estimated
Applications Application Page
CFDA No. and name Intergovern- award Project period limit** number of
available deadline date mental review (per year)* awards

84.327T Cultural Experi- 05/25/01 07/09/01 09/10/01 $110,000 Up to 36 mos .... 50 5


ences for Deaf or Hard of
Hearing Individuals.
84.327Z Center to Support 05/25/01 07/20/01 09/20/01 ........................ Up to 60 mos .... 60 1
Technology Innovation for
Students with Disabilities.
First twelve-month fund- ........................ ........................ ........................ 750,000 ........................... ................ ....................
ing period.
Subsequent twelve- ........................ ........................ ........................ 1,000,000 ........................... ................ ....................
month funding periods.
* Consistent with EDGAR 34 CFR 75.104(b), we will reject any application that proposes a project funding level for any year that exceeds the
stated maximum award amount for that year.
** Applicants must limit the Application Narrative, Part III of the Application, to the page limits noted above. Please refer to the ‘‘Page Limit’’ re-
quirements included under each priority description and the page limit standards described in the ‘‘General Requirements’’ section. We will reject
and will not consider an application that does not adhere to this requirement.

Electronic Access to This Document at the previous site. If you have Access at: http://www.access.gpo/nara/
questions about using PDF, call the U.S. index.html
You may view this document, as well
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll
as all other Department of Education Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1487.
free, at 1–888–293–6498; or in the
documents published in the Federal Dated: May 14, 2001.
Washington, DC., area at (202) 512–
Register, in text or portable document
1530. Francis V. Corrigan,
format (PDF) on the internet at the
Note: The official version of this document Deputy Director, National Institute on
following site: www.ed.gov/legislation/ is the document published in the Federal
FedRegister Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
Register. Free Internet access to the official
To use PDF you must have Adobe [FR Doc. 01–12519 Filed 5–17–01; 8:45 am]
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
Acrobat Reader, which is available free of Federal Regulations is available on GPO BILLING CODE 4000–01–U

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 17:20 May 17, 2001 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MYN2.SGM pfrm10 PsN: 18MYN2

Вам также может понравиться