Modulation-Developed ElectroMagnetic Spinning

Mark Krinker City College of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunication Technology, CUNY, New York mkrinker@aol.com

Abstract
Origination of additional magnetic spinning in vicinity of a resonance-adjusted antenna is considered. The additional magnetic spinning mostly takes place only in a case of a modulated signal. Development of the spinning is attributed to superposition of side bands caused by the modulation process. The observed spinning is non-stationary by its nature and is of a great interest due to specific properties of non-stationary rotation. As one of the products of the spinning, specific low frequency processes origin. The important role of non-stationary processes can be partially explained with origination of the low-frequency component in their spectra and relation of this component to 1/f noise. Quantitative estimation of the effect was performed with spinning electric vector analyzer SEVA and a special magnetic probe.

Introduction Magnetic spinning is one of sources of origination of specific torsion fields, associated with any spinning and rotation, disregarding the source: electrical, mechanical or others.[1] scientists today are recognizing that "spinning fields" really do exist. Just as electromagnetic fields are caused by a charge and gravitational fields are caused by weight ((to be more precise by a mass, M.K.)), torsion fields are created by any rotating objects. [2] Spinning fields have a profound impact on animate and inanimate world. In [3] electric spinning was introduced as

r r r S = sin E1 E 2

(1),

where is a frequency of rotation, -phase shift between parent vectors E1 and E2

Therefore, the spinning is a vector value proportional to an area covered by a radius equal to the vector product of parent vectors, multiplied by the angular frequency and a phase shift between the vectors. On a screen of the oscilloscope its proportional to a glowing area inside a visible ellipse. A physical sense of S is that there is possible anisotropy of space-time metrics along its direction, proportional to its value. By analogy, same can be said about magnetic spinning, where we have to replace electric vectors for magnetic induction B. There is a reason to believe that spinning fields can impact Space-time metrics. For instance, spinning electric fields are associated with Geo-pathogenic zones, GPZ, which affect health of humans living in them. Practically GPZ are encountered everywhere, having more or less magnitude. By this reason, studying spinning field is of great interest, both scientific and social. Telecommunication technology is one of considerable sources of the spinning fields. Modulation of the carrying signal is a profound component of this technology. On the other side, the modulation can be considered as a non-stationary factor. According to Kozyrevs conception, namely non-stationary rotation of a gyroscope results in known weight-variation effect [4]. The weight-related effects can be considered as a manifestation of distorted space-time metrics. On the other hand, conception of the field-gyroscope and its analogy to mechanical gyroscopes allows claiming importance of non-stationary spinning for field effects. Current research deals with phenomenon of magnetic spinning caused by an amplitude modulation.

Experimental Installation The installation consists of RF-generator TENMA 72-585 (100 kHz-450 MHz) having switched amplitude modulation, specially designed magnetic spinning

probe, oscilloscope and the modified spinning electric vector analyzer SEVA, earlier versions of which where shown in [5,6]. The 30% amplitude modulation is accomplished with 1 kHz sine wave. The magnetic spinning probe comprises two orthogonally located Hall sensors and an amplifier. During the experiment antenna was adjusted at resonance (180 MHz) by indication of the oscilloscope probe in vicinity of it. SEVA with connected magnetic probe and the RF-generator are shown in Fig.1

Fig.1. Spinning Electric Vector Analyzer SEVA with connected spinning magnetic sensor and the RFgenerator with adjusted wave antenna next to the sensor.

Results of the Experiment Fig.2 shows a background magnetic spinning in a room, on a screen of the oscilloscope. Activation of the transmitter, with no modulation, minimally changes this pattern.

Fig2. Background magnetic spinning in a room and that for non-modulated signal, reading of SEVA - 35 and 40 units, respectively

Fig.3. Modulation-developed magnetic spinning, reading of SEVA -120 units

In contrary, when 1 kHz amplitude modulation was activated, the spinning drastically increased, Fig.3. At 20 mm distance between the sensor and antenna the following SEVA readings were done: basic background spinning with no transmission- 35; transmission is on, no modulation 40; transmission is on, 1 kHz modulation - 120.

Therefore, modulation causes a substantial spinning. Explanation of the results Any modulation widens a spectrum of a source of radiation. Fig.4 shows time-and frequency domain presentation of amplitude modulation.

Fig.4. Time-domain (left) and spectral presentation of amplitude modulation

Modulating carrying frequency 0 by modulating frequency two additional oscillators 1=0- and 2=0+ actually appear. There are always exist physical conditions for superposition of electromagnetic waves in vicinity of transmitting antenna. Two major modes of superposition can be stressed: 1. superposition of vectors along same direction; 2. superposition of mutually rectangular vectors. 1. Admitting, for simplicity, both oscillations are equal and there is no phase shift between them, the superposition along same direction can be described as

2 1 + y = 2Ym cos 1 t sin t , (2) 2 2

where Ym amplitude of both oscillations.

2. Superposition of mutually rectangular vectors, shifted in phase, generally results in the spinning vector. In our case, the time-varying phase shift is furnished by superposition of three unequal frequencies: 0, 1 and 2. Its obvious that superposition of two rectangular oscillations having very close frequencies results in rotating the end of the resulting radius-vector r of two normal oscillations, Fig.5.

Fig.5. Developing resulting spinning vector r of two oscillating parent vectors X and Y.

Generally, rotation of the resulting vector is shown as

r=

x 2 + y 2 . (3)

Each of the oscillations can be shown as

x = X m sin( x t + x )

and

y = Ym sin ( y t + y ) (4)

Even small discrepancy of frequencies of superimposed vectors makes rotation non-stationary. The non-stationary rate can be estimated by a time-trend of sinA-sinB, where A and B generalized time-varying angles. At stationary rotation of the vector, the phase shift between its parent vectors remains invariable and sinA-sinB has a stable amplitude, while non-stationary rotation makes amplitude of sinA-sinB non-monotonic, Fig.6. The shown here is a rotation during one period. The left diagram shows this value for equal frequencies oscillations shifted in phase for /2, while the right diagram shows

a discrepancy between two initially in-phase oscillations having different frequencies.

Fig.6. Left: Stationary rotation of resulting vector at equal frequencies and stable phase shift (/2) between parent vectors; Right: non-stationary rotation caused by close but unequal frequencies, initially in-phase. One period is shown.

Fig.7 shows a calculated diagram for an amplitude of resulting vector R of two orthogonal oscillations of equal amplitudes according to formulas (3) and (4), for original oscillations 10 rad/s and 11 rad/s. The diagram shows resulting low frequency oscillations of R having the beating frequency of 1 rad/s.

Fig.7. Superposition of two orthogonal oscillations of 10 and 11 rad/s results in origination of lowfrequency 1rad/s oscillating amplitude of resulting vector R.

Namely non-stationary rotation and spinning were claimed by N.A.Kozyrev as a major condition for origination of non-linear gravitational phenomena with gyroscopes [4]. Speaking of a role of non-stationary rotation we can say that nonstationary phenomena are always related to the low frequency component of their spectra. The very special role of low frequencies is clearly seen in a pink-noise, 1/f (f=frequency of appearance) phenomenon. The lower is a frequency of origination of any event, the more is its magnitude. There are a lot of examples of that. For instance, law magnitude earthquakes (1-2 degree, a logarithmic value) are frequent, almost everyday phenomena, while those 7+ degrees are, fortunately, relatively seldom. The core of 1/f phenomenon is in that powerful events need more time to accumulate energy enough to overcome some critical threshold. We can suppose that low frequency beatings, originating in the considered above non-stationary processes, can interact with correspondingly lowfrequency processes in a contacting matter, having a bigger time constant than frequent weak phenomena. This partially can explain a special role of non-stationary processes. Special role of 1/f processes is considered in [7]. It has to be said here, that non-stationary spinning gyroscope, Smirnovs detector, shows an ability to work as a sensor of torsion fields produced by Earth and celestial objects [8,9]. In this experiment there was no considerable difference between background spinning and that produced by non-modulated signal, Fig.2. This can be explained by limited spectral sensitivity of the measuring instrument depending on a bandwidth of the amplifiers and magnetic sensor. It has to be said that in this experiment, the magnetic probe (based on Hall sensors) can reproduce the spinning up to 20-30 kHz, while the generator produces as much as ~100 MHz. So, the observed on the screen spinning is mostly a superposition of background spinning and low frequencies and 2 originated due to modulation

according to (2). Here is a modulating frequency. In this experiment =1kHz.

Conclusions 1. Modulation of a signal causes electromagnetic spinning in vicinity of transmitting antenna. The spinning is a result of a combined superposition: high-frequency superposition of side bands of the modulated signal and low-frequency superposition of beating frequencies. 2. There is a superposition of background spinning and that developed by the modulated transmission. 3. The antenna- produced electromagnetic spinning is non-stationary by its nature in a case of the modulated signal. 4. Non-stationary spinning is of great interest because namely nonstationary processes cause non-linear phenomena in gyroscopes, including the field gyroscopes. 5. Taking into consideration a great role of modulation, we can suppose influence of the modulation-related spectral content of mobile-phone communication on space-time metrics in vicinity of communication means. 6. Basing on spectra of amplitude and frequency modulation we can suppose more efficient contribution of more wide-band frequency modulation. 7. Special role of non-stationary processes can be explained due a to lowfrequency component in their spectra matching the big time constant powerful 1/f processes. References and Links
1. Shipov G.I. "Teoriya fizicheskogo vacuuma.", Moscow, 1993, NT-Center, 362 p. (Russian) ("Theory of physical vacuum.")

2. http://www.eioba.com/a/1tzs/torsion-fields-theory-of-physical-vacuum-shipov-and-heim 3. M. Krinker, L. Pismenny, What Stands Beyond Dowsing and Feng Shui? EcoDowsing L.L.C., New York 2006. 4. Kozyrev N.A. "On the possibility of experimental investigation of the properties of time." //Time in science and philosophy, Prague, 1971, p.111-132. 5. M.Krinker, L. Pismenny. Method and Apparatus for Analyzing and Detecting Pathogenic Zones. US Patent Application. Publication No US-2007-00:5990-A1. 01/18/2007. 6. M. Krinker. Spinning Electric Vector Analyzer, SEVA. Theory of Operation and Experimental Test. Radio-Physics of Bio-Active Radiations. Scientific Collection of International Conference. Moscow 2008, pp.5-31. 7. Parkhomov A.G., The Controlled Chaos, Time Research Center at Moscow University. Moscow. 1996. 8. Pancheluga V.A. Smirnovs Detector: Registration of Action of Remote Astro-Physical Objects. Meta-Physics No 2(4), February 2012, pp-67-80. (in Russian), available on-line:
http://www.intelros.ru/pdf/metafizika/2012_02-04/04.pdf .

9. Smirnov V. N., Egorov N. V., Shchedrin S. I. (2008). A New Detector for Perturbations in Gravitational Field. Progress in Physics, vol. 2, 129-133.