1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION CURATIVE PETITION(CIVIL) NO.191 OF 2012 IN R.P.(C)NO.630 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION(C) NO.

423 OF 2010

VIDEOCON TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD. VERSUS CEN.FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION & ORS WITH

Petitioner(s)

Respondent(s)

CURATIVE PETITION(CIVIL) NOS.194-195 OF 2012 IN R.P.(C)NOs.663-664 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION(C) NO. 423 OF 2010 AND W.P.(C)No.10 of 2011 WITH CURATIVE PETITION(CIVIL) NOS.196-197 OF 2012 IN R.P.(C)NOs.667-668 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION(C) NO. 423 OF 2010 AND W.P.(C)No.10 of 2011

2 WITH CURATIVE PETITION(CIVIL) NO.210 OF 2012 IN R.P.(C)NO.747 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION(C) NO. 423 OF 2010 WITH CURATIVE PETITION(CIVIL) NOS.255-256 OF 2012 IN D.7650 OF 2012

R.P.(C)NO.

IN WRIT PETITION(C) NO. 423 OF 2010 AND W.P.(C)No.10 of 2011 O R D E R We have gone through the curative petitions and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out

within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs. Ashok Hurra & Anr., reported in 2002 (4) S.C.C. 388. dismissed. appropriate Hence, the Curative Petitions are

Consequently, the applications for stay and directions, filed in Curative Petition(C)

Nos.194-195 of 2012, are rejected. As far as Curative Petition(C) Nos.255-256 of 2012, is concerned, rejected. ..............................CJI. (ALTAMAS KABIR) .................................J permission to file curative petitions is

3 (P. SATHASIVAM) .................................J (G.S. SINGHVI) New Delhi; February 14, 2013.

4 CHAMBER MATTER SECTION PIL

S U P R E M E

C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CURATIVE PETITION(CIVIL) NO.191 OF 2012 IN R.P.(C)NO.630 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION(C) NO. 423 OF 2010

VIDEOCON TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD. VERSUS CEN.FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION & ORS (With office report ) WITH

Petitioner(s)

Respondent(s)

CURATIVE PETITION(CIVIL) NOS.194-195 OF 2012 IN R.P.(C)NOs.663664 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION(C) NO. 423 OF 2010 and W.P. (C)No.10 of 2011 (with appln.(s) report) for stay,appropriate directions and office

WITH CURATIVE PETITION(CIVIL) NOS.196-197 OF 2012 IN R.P.(C)NOs.667668 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION(C) NO. 423 OF 2010 and W.P. (C)No.10 of 2011 (with office report) WITH CURATIVE PETITION(CIVIL) NO.210 OF 2012 IN R.P.(C)NO.747 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION(C) NO. 423 OF 2010 (with office report) WITH

5 CURATIVE PETITION(CIVIL) NOS.255-256 OF 2012 IN R.P.(C)NO. D.7650 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION(C) NO. 423 OF 2010 and W.P.(C) No.10 of 2011 (with appln.(s) for permission to file curative petition, exemption from filing c/c and office report) Date: 14/02/2013 These Petitions were CIRCULATED today.

CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI BY CIRCULATION

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have gone through the curative petitions and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs. Ashok Hurra & Anr., reported in 2002 (4) S.C.C. 388. Hence, the Curative Petitions are dismissed. Consequently, the applications for stay and appropriate directions, filed in Curative Petition(C) Nos.194-195 of 2012, are rejected. As far as Curative Petition(C) Nos.255-256 of 2012, is concerned, permission to file curative petitions is rejected.

(Sheetal Dhingra) (Juginder Kaur) Court Master Assistant Registrar [Signed order is placed on the file]