Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 37

Economic Design of Small Scale LNG Tankers and Terminals

Bjrn Munko TGE Gas Engineering

Trends in LNG shipping


Larger LNG carriers for classical LNG transportation market (up to 270,000 m) Smaller LNG carriers for new LNG transportation market
Clean fuel power plants for remote industrial areas or islands Regions without pipeline grid (e. g. Norwegian coast) Short sailing times in relation to LNG consumption Design requirement for partial filling

LNG Conference

Trends in LNG shipping


Smaller LNG carriers
A Japanese yard is building a 19,000 m vessel with 3 spherical tanks (delivery: 2007). An Australian company is developing projects of up to 30,000 m transport capacity. Standard designs for LNG ships (spherical aluminium tanks or membrane tanks) are expensive economics for such niche markets have to be improved.

LNG Conference

Trends in LNG shipping


Very Small LNG carriers (for coastal trade)
First very small ship (1,000 m) for Norwegian coast delivered in 2004 (stainless steel tanks, electric propulsion) Two LNG ships of 2,500 m delivered in 2003/5 for Japanese coast (cylindrical aluminium tanks) Anthony Veder (NL) is building a 7,500 m LNG/Ethylene carrier for coastal transport in Norway (vessel design and gas plant supplied by TGE)

LNG Conference

Design approach to small LNG terminals


Market: Small consumption (islands, remote industrial area) Utilizing the know-how from design of large LNG terminals and of small ethylene terminals Tank concept depends on throughput and storage capacity
above abt. 10,000 m: flat bottom tank (like large terminals) o containment type depends on local rules and safety requirements up to abt. 10,000 m: pressure vessel type tanks

BOG handling, tank pressure depends on send-out conditions LNG re-gasification concept depends on capacities and local conditions
LNG Conference
5

Example: 30,000 m flat bottom tank: built in Urumqi/China (single containment)

LNG Conference

Containment types acc. BS7777


single containment type: inner tank for containing the product, outer container for retaining and protecting the insulation only

roof

inner roof

insulated suspended deck

loose filled insulation outer shell ( not able to contain liquid ) inner tank

external insulation with weather barrier

inner tank wall inner tank bottom

base insulation Bund wall elevated concrete base

base insulation bund wall

concrete foundation with bottom heater

LNG Conference

Containment types acc. BS7777


double containment type: inner tank for containing the product, outer container for retaining the insulation and in case of inner tank failure the product liquid ( but not the vapour )
roof inner roof

rain cover insulated suspended deck

rain cover

prestressed concrete outer tank wall

loose filled insulation outer shell ( not able to contain liquid ) inner tank

external insulation with weather barrier

inner tank wall inner tank bottom

outer tank shell ( able to contain the liquid )

base insulation

base insulation

elevated concrete base

concrete foundation with bottom heater

LNG Conference

Containment types acc. BS7777


full containment type: inner tank for containing the product, outer container for retaining the insulation and in case of inner tank failure both the product liquid and the vapour
outer roof roof inner roof loose filled insulation

insulated suspended deck insulation at inside outer tank outer tank wall liner prestressed concrete outer tank inner tank base insulation wall insulation at inner side of outer tank ( or loose filled insulation ) inner tank wall inner tank bottom base insulation

outer tank shell or prestressed concrete wall with liner

elevated concrete base

concrete foundation with bottom heater

LNG Conference

Pressure vesesel type storage tanks: Example: 5 x 1,200 m ethylene storage (China)

LNG Conference

10

Pressure vesesel type storage tanks:

Ethylene storage built in China:


Inner Diameter: Length TL TL: Volume: Material: Insulation: Design pressure: 4.6 m 75 m 5 x 1,200 cbm 5% Nickel steel foamglas 23 bar g

LNG storage:
Material: Insulation: Design pressure: stainless steel (AISI 304) foamglas or vacuum depending on send-out situation
LNG Conference
11

LNG re-gasification equipment


Preferred equipment depends on required capacities and local ambient condition (air, sea water): Open rack vaporizer (ORV)
using sea water as heat source

Submerged combustion vaporizer (SCV)


using gas energy

Ambient air vaporizer (AAV)


using ambient air as heat source
LNG Conference
12

Open Rack Vaporizer


low operating cost: water pumping energy higher investment costs need of sea water intake min. temperature for seawater required

LNG Conference

13

Submerged combustion vaporizer


lower investment costs need of dedicated fuel gas installation high operating cost by gas consumption ( ~ 1.5% of gas send-out)

LNG Conference

14

Ambient air vaporizer


moderate investment costs need large installation areas dry ambient air preferred application currently under investigation (qualification program) for larger capacities

LNG Conference

15

TGEs design approach to small LNG carriers


Objective: minimize the CAPEX Utilize the know-how from design of Ethylene carriers Ethylene ships: TGEs market share for delivery of gas handling systems and cargo tanks is more than 80% Actual order book: 32 ethylene carriers Maximize operation flexibility for a combined LNG/Ethylene/LPG-carrier Main questions:
Cargo tank design Boil-off gas handling / propulsion system
LNG Conference
16

Types of cargo tanks for gas carriers


(Internal insulation tanks) (Integral tanks) (Semi-membrane tanks: very few applications) Membrane tanks Independent tanks (Type A) Type B Type C
LNG Conference
17

TGEs design approach: independent Type C tanks


self-supporting pressure vessel cylindrical or bilobe with outside insulation no secondary barrier required no restriction concerning partial filling

LNG Conference

18

Cargo tanks for 22,000 m Ethylene-carrier


5,700 m (4 tanks) 4.7 bar g 480 t 5% Nickel steel

LNG Conference

19

Type C tanks for LNG


Ship capacity below 15,000 m
Cylindrical tank design
o o

2 tank design up to abt. 10,000 m 3 tank design up to abt. 15,000 m

Ship capacity above 15,000 m


Bilobe tank design
o o

3 tank design up to 25,000 m 4 tank design up to 35,000 m (or even 40,000 m)

LNG Conference

20

Type C tanks for LNG


Tank design temperature: -163 C Tank material:
(Aluminium) (9% Ni-steel) SS AISI 304L

LNG Conference

21

Type C tanks for LNG


Ship design example: 30,000 m capacity: 4 Bilobe tanks each abt. 7,500 m capacity Min. design pressure @ density 500 kg/m:
o

AISI 304L: 2.74 bar g AISI 304L: abt. 530 tons

Tank weights:
o

LNG Conference

22

30,000 m LNG-Carrier

lbp = 175.2 m b = 27.6 m d = 8.8 m speed = 17.5 kn


LNG Conference
23

Type C tanks for LNG


Design constraints for LNG compared to Ethylene: Higher material shrinkage due to:
o o

Larger delta T during cooling down Higher material shrinkage factor for AISI 304L

Problem especially for bi-lobe tanks: for 15 m diameter tanks the shrinkage is 35 mm (304L) Detailed design review and complete re-design of supports necessary (displacement and stress analysis, temperature profiles)!
LNG Conference
24

Type C tanks for LNG


Design appraisal by a classification society FEM analysis of tank shell, supports and shipside steel structure for different loading cases

LNG Conference

25

Tank insulation for LNG


Tank insulation for Ethylene:
Typical Polystyrene panels glued to tank surface with abt. 230 mm thickness

Tank insulation for LNG application


Same insulation type may be applied (spherical LNG tanks use same technology) Insulation thickness of 300 mm (boil-off rate abt. 0.35 0.45 %/day) Design details modified (shrinkage, stress)

LNG Conference

26

Type C tanks for LNG new design


Concept approval certificate already issued by Class Patent pending 30 35,000 m designs have been discussed for a specific project with three shipyards on the basis of confidentiality agreements concerning design details

LNG Conference

27

Boil-off gas handling / propulsion system


Alternatives for boil-off gas handling considering typically short voyages and small BOG quantities:
a) Burn the BOG in a thermal oxidiser (combustor) b) Accept a pressure increase during voyage, provided that receiving terminal can accept it c) Utilize BOG for propulsion (electric power production) d) Reliquefaction

LNG Conference

28

Boil-off gas handling b) Pressure increase


4

3,5

9% Ni

SS 304L P ressure [bar g]


2,5

2
Bas ic LNG Com pos ition N2:2% CO2:0% C1:89% C2:5,5% C3:2,5% C4:1%

1,5

0,5

Tank Volume: 30.000 m Insulation: 300 mm Polystyrene Initial pressure: 140 mbar g

0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Sailing Time [days]

LNG Conference

29

Boil-off gas handling c) Utilize BOG for propulsion

Owner: Anthony Veder, NL (design and gas plant supplied by TGE) Project: Coastal transport in Norway LNG to be used as fuel HFO to be used as fuel for transportation of other cargoes
LNG Conference
30

Boil-off gas handling c) Utilize BOG for propulsion


GAS GAS

HFO HFO

7,500 m LNG/LEG/LPG carrier for Anthony Veder Electric propulsion (Gas, HFO): HFO generator sets: 2 x 3,685 kW Gas generator sets: 2 x 2,280 kW thrusters for optimum manoeuvrability
LNG Conference
31

Boil-off gas handling d) Reliquefaction


Electric propulsion (utilize LNG and HFO as fuel) high CAPEX Conventional slow speed diesel-mechanic (HFO) BOG reliquefaction needed (CAPEX !), if pressure increase is not an option Alternative concepts based on mature technology:
pure LNG carriers: nitrogen system (Brayton cycle) combined LNG/LEG carrier: utilize cascade technology from Ethylene ships (under development)

LNG Conference

32

Combined LNG/Ethylene/LPG Carrier


Changing grade from LNG to Ethylene or LPG requires tank warming up Changing grade is time consuming (especially from LNG to LPG) Cargo contamination may be an issue (for some cargoes visual inspection may be required) Frequent grade changes are not economic

LNG Conference

33

Combined LNG/Ethylene/LPG Carrier


Small LNG ships with type C cargo tanks can easily be upgraded to combined gas carriers (installation of BOG reliquefaction for Ethylene) LNG transportation in smaller quantities is not a mature market Combined LNG/Ethylene/LPG carriers like 7,500 m vessel meet the demands of a developing market
increase operating flexibility seasonal LNG transportation demands up to 35,000 m
LNG Conference
34

Economics of small LNG carriers


CAPEX:
Little changes for ships hull construction (steel grade of tank supports) Tanks and cargo handling system more expensive than for Ethylene carriers TGE estimation shows an overall CAPEX abt. 10 15 % above the corresponding Ethylenecarrier price, depending BOG handling concept

LNG Conference

35

Conclusion
Target market: small gas consumers without access to a pipeline grid TGEs design approach with type C tanks is based in vast experience with Ethylene carriers The combined 7,500 m LNG/Ethylene/LPG carrier demonstrates that TGEs approach meets the requirements of this developing market Small LNG carriers can be economical with type C cargo tanks up to 35,000 m capacity TGE has received a Concept Approval of a modified tank design with a classification society A patent is pending for the new tank design
LNG Conference
36

Thank you for your attention!


For any questions please contact TGE: email: bjoern.munko@tge.net phone: +49-228-60448-217

Вам также может понравиться