Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

34690 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No.

94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2002 / Notices

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: SUMMARY: The Leader, Regulatory Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
Disposition pending (until NARA has Information Management Group, Office Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs; Not-for-profit
approved a retention and disposal of the Chief Information Officer, invites institutions.
schedule for these records, the records comments on the proposed information Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
will be treated as permanent). collection requests as required by the Burden:
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Responses: 658,800.
SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: Burden Hours: 169,084.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
Deputy Director of Policy, National submit comments on or before July 15, Abstract: The 2003 National
Security Agency/Central Security 2002. Assessment of Educational Progress
Service, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6248, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
(NAEP) Assessment will encompass the
Ft. George G. Meade, MD 20755–6248. 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of two curricular areas of Reading and
1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) requires that Mathematics. Since 1984, NAEP has
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
the Office of Management and Budget obtained descriptive information from
Individuals seeking to determine three different sets of respondents:
whether records about themselves are (OMB) provide interested Federal
agencies and the public an early students, teachers, and school
contained in this record system should administrators. Questionnaires are
address written inquires to the Deputy opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or administered to students at grades 4, 8,
Director of Policy, National Security and 12, to teachers at grades 4 and 8, to
Agency/Central Security Service, 9800 waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public school administrators at grades 4, 8, and
Savage Road, Suite 6248, Ft. George G. 12. This process continues in 2003.
Meade, MD 20755–6248. participation in the approval process
The student background
Written inquiries should include the would defeat the purpose of the
questionnaires consist of two types of
parent or child’s name, along with his information collection, violate State or
questions: (1) Core questions and (2)
or her Social Security Number. Federal law, or substantially interfere
subject-specific background questions.
with any agency’s ability to perform its
Requests for copies of the proposed
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: statutory obligations. The Leader,
information collection request may be
Individuals seeking access to records Regulatory Information Management
accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov,
about themselves contained in this Group, Office of the Chief Information
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
record system should address written Officer, publishes that notice containing
Collections’’ link and by clicking on
inquiries to the Deputy Director of proposed information collection
link number 2032. When you access the
Policy, National Security Agency/ requests prior to submission of these
information collection, click on
Central Security Service, 9800 Savage requests to OMB. Each proposed
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Road, Suite 6248, Ft. George G. Meade, information collection, grouped by
Written requests for information should
MD 20755–6248. office, contains the following: (1) Type
be addressed to Vivian Reese,
Written inquiries should include the of review requested, e.g. new, revision,
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
parent or child’s name, along with his extension, existing or reinstatement; (2)
Avenue, SW, Room 4050, Regional
or her Social Security Number. Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4)
Office Building 3, Washington, DC
Description of the need for, and
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 20202–4651 or to the e-mail address
proposed use of, the information; (5)
vivian_reese@ed.gov. Requests may also
The NSA/CSS rules for accessing Respondents and frequency of
be electronically mailed to the internet
records, and for contesting contents and collection; and (6) Reporting and/or
address OCIO_RIMG@ed.gov or faxed to
appealing initial determinations are Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites
202–708–9346. Please specify the
published at 32 CFR part 322 or may be public comment.
complete title of the information
obtained from the Deputy Director of The Department of Education is
collection when making your request.
Policy, National Security Agency/ especially interested in public comment
Comments regarding burden and/or
Central Security Service, 9800 Savage addressing the following issues: (1) Is
the collection activity requirements
Road, Suite 6248, Ft. George G. Meade, this collection necessary to the proper
should be directed to Kathy Axt at (540)
MD 20755–6248. functions of the Department; (2) will
776–7742. Individuals who use a
this information be processed and used
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: telecommunications device for the deaf
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
Individuals themselves; parents or (TDD) may call the Federal Information
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
guardians of individuals enrolled in day Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
Department enhance the quality, utility,
care programs; NSA personnel; medical 8339.
and clarity of the information to be
providers who have provided collected; and (5) how might the [FR Doc. 02–12081 Filed 5–14–02; 8:45 am]
information about family members Department minimize the burden of this BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
needing or receiving care; and collection on the respondents, including
contractor personnel and/or teachers. through the use of information
technology. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None. Dated: May 8, 2002. Notice of Proposed Information
[FR Doc. 02–12055 Filed 5–14–02; 8:45 am] John Tressler, Collection Requests
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
Leader, Regulatory Information Management,
Office of the Chief Information Officer. AGENCY: Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed information
Office of Educational Research and
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION collection requests.
Improvement
Type of Review: Revision. SUMMARY: The Acting Leader,
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests Title: National Assessment for Regulatory Information Management,
Education Statistics: 2003. Office of the Chief Information Officer,
AGENCY: Department of Education. Frequency: Annually. invites comments on the proposed

VerDate May<13>2002 12:44 May 14, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM pfrm13 PsN: 15MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2002 / Notices 34691

information collection requests as (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; 2002 to ensure that survey data can be
required by the Paperwork Reduction (4) how might the Department enhance collected before the end of the 2001–02
Act of 1995. the quality, utility, and clarity of the school year this Spring/Summer.
DATES: An emergency review has been information to be collected; and (5) how Frequency: Biennially.
requested in accordance with the Act might the Department minimize the Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 3507(j)), since public burden of this collection on Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs.
harm is reasonably likely to result if respondents, including through the use Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
normal clearance procedures are of information technology. Burden:
followed. Approval by the Office of Dated: May 10, 2002. Responses: 800.
Management and Budget (OMB) has Joseph Schubart, Burden Hours: 178.
been requested by May 13, 2002. A Requests for copies of the proposed
Acting Leader, Regulatory Information
regular clearance process is also Management, Office of the Chief Information information collection request may be
beginning. Interested persons are Officer. accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov,
invited to submit comments on or before by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
July 15, 2002. Office of the Undersecretary Collections’’ link and by clicking on
ADDRESSES: Written comments Type of Review: Revision. link number 2034. When you access the
regarding the emergency review should Title: Evaluation of the Partnership information collection, click on
be addressed to the Office of Grants Program, Title II, Higher ‘‘Download Attachments ‘‘ to view.
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Education Act. Written requests for information should
Attention: Karen Lee, Desk Officer: Abstract: The purpose of the Title II be addressed to Vivian Reese,
Department of Education, Office of Partnership Grants Program evaluation Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Management and Budget; 725 17th is to assess the impact, strengths and Avenue, SW., Room 4050, Regional
Street, NW., Room 10235, New weaknesses of the Partnership Grants Office Building 3, Washington, DC
Executive Office Building, Washington, Program, one of the three programs 20202–4651 or to the e-mail address
DC 20503 or should be electronically authorized in Title II of the Higher vivan.reese@ed.gov. Requests may also
mailed to the internet address Education Act (HEA) Amendments of be electronically mailed to the internet
Karen_F._Lee@omb.eop.gov. 1998. This request, to revise the Title II address OCIO_RIMG@ed.gov or faxed to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section evaluation to include a school/ 202–708–9346. Please specify the
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of university partnership survey for complete title of the information
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires elementary school principals, will assist collection when making your request.
that the Director of OMB provide the U.S. Department of Education in Comments regarding burden and/or
interested Federal agencies and the understanding the characteristics of the collection activity requirements,
public an early opportunity to comment collaborations between public contact Kathy Axt at her internet
on information collection requests. The elementary schools and institutions of address Kathy.Axt@ed.gov. Individuals
Office of Management and Budget higher education (IHEs) that are who use a telecommunications device
(OMB) may amend or waive the participating in Title II partnership for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
requirement for public consultation to activities, as well as the assocations Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
the extent that public participation in between school/IHE collaborations and 800–877–8339.
the approval process would defeat the school-level student achievement [FR Doc. 02–12090 Filed 5–14–02; 8:45 am]
purpose of the information collection, outcomes.
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
violate State or Federal law, or Additional Information: This survey
substantially interfere with any agency’s is an essential component of the
ability to perform its statutory evaluation of the Title II HEA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
obligations. The Acting Leader, Partnership Grants Program and has
Information Management Group, Office been designed to address the Notice of Proposed Information
of the Chief Information Officer, Administration’s interest in Collection Requests
publishes this notice containing understanding the associations between
proposed information collection school/university partnership activities AGENCY: Department of Education.
requests at the beginning of the and student assessments at the school ACTION: Notice of Proposed Information
Departmental review of the information level. Without an emergency clearance, Collection Requests.
collection. Each proposed information the data collection would have to be
collection, grouped by office, contains postponed until Fall, 2002, which SUMMARY: The Acting Leader,
the following: (1) Type of review would have two adverse consequences. Regulatory Information Management,
requested, e.g., new, revision, extension, First, it would require a change in the Office of the Chief Information Officer,
existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) target year of inquiry to be the 2001– invites comments on the proposed
Summary of the collection; (4) 2002 school year, which would likely information collection requests as
Description of the need for, and increase the sampling frame required by the Paperwork Reduction
proposed use of, the information; (5) substantially. This would, therefore, Act of 1995.
Respondents and frequency of have a serious effect on survey costs. DATES: An emergency review has been
collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Second, this survey is designed to be requested in accordance with the Act
Recordkeeping burden. ED invites longitudinal. Delaying the first data (44 U.S.C. Chapter 3507 (j)), since
public comment. The Department of collection until Fall, 2002 would mean public harm is reasonably likely to
Education is especially interested in that no data would be available about result if normal clearance procedures
public comment addressing the the earliest stages of partnership are followed. Approval by the Office of
following issues: (1) is this collection activities. This will make it difficult to Management and Budget (OMB) has
necessary to the proper functions of the describe the evolution of partnership been requested by May 29, 2002. A
Department; (2) will this information be activities from their earliest stages regular clearance process is also
processed and used in a timely manner; forward. Clearance is needed by May 13, beginning. Interested persons are

VerDate 11<MAY>2000 21:27 May 14, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM pfrm11 PsN: 15MYN1

Вам также может понравиться