Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Islamic Finance
Bulletin
..………….………………………………………………
Towards an informed market
S
ince the emergence of the
contemporary Islamic finance i) Commodity Murabaha
market, the treasury departments
of Islamic financial institutions (“IFIs”) The earliest form of Islamic liquidity-
have been facing many challenges in management tool had been commodity-
managing their surplus liquidity. The linked investments based on the
recent surge in liquidity, primarily driven murabaha principle. The commodity
by spikes in oil prices, has exacerbated murabaha product had been principally
liquidity-management challenges. This developed as an alternative source of
article, however, will only focus on funds for the commodity desks of some
Islamic money-market-type instruments. international banks. Instead of borrowing
internally from their treasury, the
The key characteristics of a money- commodity desks had bought the
market instrument are as follows: commodities on deferred-payment terms
from IFIs. In the early days, the Islamic
(i) Enables large sums of money to be deferred-payment terms had often been
transferred quickly, at a low cost. more competitive than the international
(ii) Has a short maturity (1 day to 1 banks’ internal treasury rates. This had
year). encouraged several international banks to
(iii) Can be converted to cash quickly seek commodity murabaha trades with
and at a low cost (active secondary IFIs. Commodity murabaha trades are
market). usually carried out in the following way:
(iv) Has low price risk due to short
tenure. (i) The IFI will buy “spot” certain
(v) Has a high degree of safety with commodities, usually commodity
regard to principal investment. warrants traded on the London
Metal Exchange, from a supplier -
The attributes above are collectively at a price of, say, X.
referred to as “the Five Characteristics”. (ii) The IFI will then sell the
commodity to the bank at a higher
price, e.g. X+Y, payable in 3
months. The Y could be computed
based on various benchmarks,
e.g. the 3-month USD LIBID minus The IFIs are not able to transfer large
12.5 basis points. sums at quick notice; once the commodity
(iii) The bank’s commodity desk will murabaha trade has been concluded, the
use the commodity acquired for its IFIs are not able to convert the trade into
trading book. cash before maturity, due to various
(iv) On the maturity of 3 months, the Shariah restrictions on the trading of
bank will pay a deferred price of X debt. The IFI can, of course, negotiate
plus Y (for the commodity) to the with the bank to pre-pay the commodity
IFI. murabaha debt before maturity, and offer
the bank a discount based on the concept
This instrument only satisfies some of the of dha wa ta’ajjal (debt discounting for
Five Characteristics; it fails to meet the early payment). However, the process is
first and third ones. not as straightforward as a secondary-
market trade.
(ii) Commodity Tawarruq (ii) The IFI will then sell the
commodity to the bank at a
Following the above, commodity higher price, e.g. X+Y, payable in
murabaha financing adopted a different 3 months. The Y could be
form based on the tawarruq model. computed based on various
Although this new form is often known as benchmarks, e.g. the 3-month
a commodity murabaha trade, the proper USD LIBID minus 12.5 basis
terminology is “commodity tawarruq points.
trade” - because the buyer will always (iii) The bank’s treasury department
subsequently sell the commodity to the will immediately sell the
supplier. The tawarruq model has helped commodity to another supplier
IFIs conduct commodity trades directly (and sometimes to the original
with the treasury departments of banks, supplier), for a price equal to X.
and has provided the IFIs with a broader (iv) Upon maturity 3 months later, the
base of investors to deploy their short- bank will pay a deferred price of
term liquidity. Commodity tawarruq X plus Y (for the commodity) to
trades are normally conducted as follows: the IFI.
Bank is only responsible for the breach of Also, the IFIs could not unwind the
the undertaking if it has defaulted or been transaction and obtain cash before the
negligent in investing or managing the maturity due to the agency terms.
funds. The IFI will have the onus of Further, the agency relationship opens up
proof to establish the willful default or the possibility that the IFIs as principal
negligence of the Agent Bank. may end up bearing the losses related to
the investments which reduces the degree
This instrument fails to meet the first, of safety of principal (the fifth
third and fifth characteristics. It is often characteristic).
very cumbersome for the IFIs to negotiate
the agency arrangement with the Agent
Bank and this inhibits their ability to
transfer funds quickly.
(iv) Government Investment Issues This instrument satisfies all of the Five
(“GII”) Characteristics. Under Malaysian Shariah
interpretation, IFIs are able to trade GII
In 1983, the Malaysian Central Bank certificates in the secondary market
introduced an Islamic liquidity- pursuant to the concept of bay al-dayn
management programme for IFIs, based (sale of debt). As such, their trading of
on the concept of qard al-hasn GII certificates in the secondary market is
(benevolent loan) and voluntary hiba similar to that of any conventional
(gift). This programme is structured as money-market instrument. Nonetheless,
follows: the voluntary hiba arrangement has not
been accepted by Shariah scholars in the
(i) The IFI will deposit its surplus Middle East, based on the maxim that
liquidity as a benevolent loan to the "what is a matter of common practice has
Central Bank, for an agreed period. the same effect as an express condition".
(ii) The agreement will clearly set out The “sale of debt” concept has also been
that the IFI is contractually not rejected by Middle Eastern scholars on
entitled to receive any return on the various Shariah grounds. Hence, this type
loan. of instrument is only prevalent in
(iii) The Central Bank will use the loan Malaysia, and has limited applications
to undertake development projects elsewhere.
for the benefit of the nation, and
repay the loan upon maturity.
(iv) The Central Bank will usually,
however, make a voluntary hiba to
the IFI - invariably linked to the
prevailing money-market rates.
Alternative Liquidity
Management Instruments
(iv) The Issuer SPV then issues sukuk Government at the original cost;
in the primary market, with a 3- the sale proceeds will be used to
month tenure and a 3.0% return redeem the outstanding sukuk.
per year. (x) If the lease rentals and
(v) The Issuer SPV then appoints the receivables paid by the
Government to collect the Government are not sufficient to
eligible receivables from the cover the quarterly returns/profits
creditors/payers, and distribute to to the sukuk holders, the Issuer
the Issuer SPV on a quarterly SPV has the option to terminate
basis. the arrangement and require the
(vi) The Issuer SPV will use the Government to immediately
rental and receivables paid by the purchase the entire portfolio at
Government to distribute the original cost.
quarterly returns/profits to the
sukuk holders. This instrument, although much more
(vii) The Issuer SPV will only receive complex than the prevailing structures,
an amount equal to the also satisfies all of the Five
return/profit component for the Characteristics. Most importantly, the
70% of the sukuk amount (the sukuk al-istismar concept is widely
return/profit component for the accepted by most of the contemporary
other 30% will stem from the scholars in the Middle East and Far East
lease rentals). The Issuer SPV (including Malaysia). This instrument
will instruct the Government to may be another ideal solution to the
invest all surplus funds under current liquidity-management challenges
Islamic principles, to generate a faced by the Islamic finance industry, and
return equal to the return/profit could reduce the hurdles encountered by
indicated under the sukuk. many governments in sourcing
(viii) Before redeeming the respective underlying assets that are 100% tangible.
sukuk, the Issuer SPV will issue a
new series of sukuk in the
primary market, to replace the
maturing sukuk. The new series
of sukuk may have different rates
of return and tenures. The
proceeds from the new sukuk will
be used to redeem the maturing
issue.
(ix) This renewal process can be
repeated until notice is given by
the Government to end the lease
arrangement and buy back the
portfolio of assets (30% physical
assets and 70% eligible
receivables) from the Issuer SPV.
The Issuer SPV will sell the
portfolio of assets to the
Another innovative solution to Islamic (vi) Upon maturity of the sukuk, the
liquidity management may be the Issuer SPV will exercise the
currently fashionable Islamic equity- purchase undertaking and compel
linked instruments. The proposed the market counterparty to
structure of such instruments is as purchase the equity portfolio at
follows: the pre-agreed price.
(vii) Upon receiving the purchase
(i) The Government (acting through price from the market
the Ministry of Finance or the counterparty, the Issuer SPV will
Central Bank) establishes a redeem the sukuk.
special-purpose vehicle (which (viii) The Issuer SPV may issue many
could be a limited-liability series of sukuk in the primary
company) to facilitate the sukuk market, with each series having
issuance (”Issuer SPV”). different tenures and returns as
(ii) The Issuer SPV then issues sukuk well as market counterparties.
in the primary market, with a 3-
month tenure and a return of This instrument not only satisfies all of
3.0% per annum (the return can the Five Characteristics, but is also
be linked to the prevailing reasonably easy to implement and
money-market rate). execute. Since the sukuk is fully
(iii) The Issuer SPV then buys a evidenced by eligible equities, it is
portfolio of eligible equities from accepted by most of the contemporary
the market and passively holds scholars in the Middle East and Far East.
the equities in trust. The eligible equities can be selected
(iv) The Issuer SPV subsequently based on the prevailing Shariah
obtains an irrevocable screenings applicable to equities, such as
undertaking from a market the Dow Jones Islamic Equities Screening
counterparty (e.g. a reputable Methodology. This instrument can
financial institution), to purchase effectively resolve the current problems
the equity portfolio at a price faced by many governments in sourcing
equal to the sukuk issue amount underlying assets that are 100% physical
plus a profit equal to 3.0% per for sukuk issuance. However, some
annum. No fee is payable to the Shariah scholars have raised certain
counterparty in respect of the objections against the nature of the
undertaking. undertaking. Again, further research
(v) The Issuer SPV also provides an needs to be conducted in this area.
irrevocable undertaking to the
market counterparty to sell the
equity portfolio at a price equal to
the sukuk issue amount
(exercisable only if the purchase
undertaking is not exercised). No
fee is payable to the Issuer SPV
in respect of the undertaking.
Illustration
RAFE HANEEF
I
jarah Muntahiyah Bittamleek is a The customer approaches the bank to
form of leasing contract which finance a vehicle, by promising to lease
includes a promise by the lessor to the vehicle from the bank. Based on the
transfer ownership of the leased property customer’s promise, the bank purchases
to a lessee, either at the end of the Ijarah the vehicle from the dealer.
term or by stages during the tenure of the
contract. At this juncture, the bank - as the owner
of the vehicle - will lease the vehicle to
It is a lease agreement combined with an the customer, at an agreed rental amount.
undertaking by the lessee to purchase the The rental will be fixed for the entire
leased goods at any time during the term tenure. However, if the bank wants to
of the lease, at an agreed price. The change the rental rate, it must be
transfer of ownership may come in communicated and agreed to by the other
various ways, such as the following: party beforehand.
Illustration
2 3
Description
1 The customer approaches the bank to purchase the vehicle. The
customer agrees to lease the vehicle from the bank.
2 The bank purchased the vehicle from the seller.
3 The bank pays the seller.
4 The bank leases the vehicle.
5 The Customer pays rental until maturity.
Shariah Aspect
Ijarah is derived from the Arabic word The Ijarah agreement is preceded
ajara or ujr, meaning remuneration or by the drawing up of a master
reward. Ijarah is a contract of lease in agreement covering a number of
Islamic law, which means to take Ijarah transactions between the
possession of some utility or services for bank and the customer, setting out
payment. Ijarah indicates the sale of a the general terms and conditions of
benefit, use or service for a price that can agreement between the 2 parties.
be either fixed or floating. Subsequently, there may be:
At the end of the contract, the bank employment for the hand of his daughter
transfers its ownership of the leased asset in marriage. Allah SWT says:
to the customer via one of the following
methods:
The validity of the Ijarah Muntahiyah Bittamleek contract depends on its compliance with
Shariah requirements. Thus, in order for a transaction to be valid, it must fulfil the essential
elements (rukn) of the contract, which has its own necessary conditions (syart) that need to
be observed.
The following are the essential elements and necessary conditions of an Ijarah contract:
Essential
Necessary Conditions
Element
inseparable from other assets that can The profit will be finally allocated from
be presented as contribution to the sale proceeds existing assets (actual
capital. Funds in the current account valuation), or based on the valuation of
can be withdrawn as contribution to assets at fair value (constructive
capital. valuation). The allocation of profits must
be based on actual profits earned.
Any contribution in foreign
currencies to the Musharakah capital Profits can be carried forward and set
must be translated in to the currency aside as reserves (investment risk reserves
of the Musharakah, at the current and profit equalisation reserve), subject to
exchange rate. the provisions of the articles of
association of the Musharakah..
A partner cannot guarantee the capital
of another. The loss shall be borne periodically by
the respective partners in accordance with
The management of the Musharakah their capital contribution. It is not
can be restricted to certain partners or permitted to hold one partner or a group
a single partner. A fixed remuneration of partners liable for the entire loss, or
to such “managing” partner(s) is not liable for a percentage of loss that does
allowed, although the partner(s) can not match their share of ownership.
earn a greater allocation of profit, at a However, a partner can take
higher ratio than its share of capital responsibility to bear the loss at the time
contribution. A manager other than of the loss without any prior condition.
the partner(s) can also be appointed to
administer the Musharakah, at a fixed A number of risks are present at this
remuneration and a share of the stage. Capital recovery due to credit risk
profits, if any; is one of them. The Musharakah capital
may not be recovered as it ranks lower
• Profit sharing ratio: than debt instruments upon liquidation.
The profit allocation is calculated net Nevertheless, a third-party guarantee can
of operating costs, expenses and be obtained for the capital loss by some
taxes. The ratio can be amended from or all the partners provided that the
time to time. legality and financial liability of the
guarantee is independent from the
The profit allocation can be equal to contract, the guarantee is not limited in
the ratio of invested capital or any manner to the contract, the third-party
different, as agreed between the guarantor does not hold more than a 50%
partners provided that the ”sleeping equity in the entity to be guaranteed and
partner” is not entitled to more than the guaranteed entity does not own more
their ratio of invested capital. The than 50% of the guarantor.
share of profit cannot be stated in a
lump sum or a percentage of the Another form of capital recovery risk is
capital. when it is due to market risk. Although a
third-party guarantee can be obtained for
the loss of capital of some or all partners, promise must not be stated in the
there are certain Shariah restrictions on Musharakah contract, but in a separate
the use of this mitigation technique. purchase and sale agreement.
Meanwhile, counterparty risk is when the There is counterparty risk present at this
partner does not pay the profit that the stage. This occurs when the withdrawing
financing institution is entitled to. The partners owes money to the financing
loss-making operations that require institution. Nevertheless, the financing
additional capital injection exposes the institution is able to buy the withdrawing
financing institution to the risk of capital partner’s share or to find a new partner to
impairment and the opportunity to takeover.
reinvest in other types of investments. A
mitigating strategy is for the Musharakah There is also price risk, whereby the
customer to create a takaful reserve to financing institution as the buying partner
mitigate the risk of losses. Also, is exposed to fluctuations in the share
staggered principal redemption may price (low investment value).
reduce the overall exposure throughout
the Musharakah period. The parties should also be mindful that
the purchase and sale are effected in a
Shariah compliance risk is another separate agreement and the acquisition
possibility. For example capital price of the equity is not fixed at the
contribution from the current account is original or face value (as it can be
not properly withdrawn and transferred construed as a price guarantee and,
into the Musharakah fund (non- therefore, non-recognition of income).
recognition of capital). This is a Shariah-compliance risk.
Bibliography
Ayob, Meor Amri Meor (May 1999). Rating Islamic Debt Securities: A
Primer. RAM’s Special Highlights. RAM
BNM (November 1999). The Central Bank and the Financial System in
Malaysia - A Decade of Change. BNM
Ismail, Mohd Izazee (March 2002). Islamic Private Debt Securities: Issues
& Challenges. RAM’s Special Highlights. RAM
The author, Meor Amri bin Meor Ayob, is the BOND PRICING AGENCY MALAYSIA
Chief Executive Officer of Bond Pricing SDN BHD (formerly known as BondWeb
Agency Malaysia Sdn Bhd (previously known Malaysia Sdn Bhd)
as Bondweb Malaysia Sdn Bhd). Meor has
over 16 years of professional work experience BPAM, as Bondweb Malaysia Sdn Bhd, was
as a regulator in Bank Negara Malaysia and as incorporated on 27 September 2004 under the
a credit analyst with Rating Agency Malaysia Malaysian Companies Act 1965. It was
Berhad (now known as RAM Holdings registered as a bond-pricing agency (“BPA”)
Berhad). by the Securities Commission on 28 April 28
In RAM, his last position had been Head of 2006, and has met and exceeded the
Financial Institutions Ratings. He has a wealth requirements outlined in the Guideline on the
of experience, especially oin the risk elements Registration of Bond Pricing Agencies.
of the bond market. He is also has vastly
experienced in the sukuk market. On 15 September 2008, Bondweb Malaysia
Sdn Bhd changed its name to Bond Pricing
Agency Malaysia Sdn Bhd (or BPAM). This
coincides with BPAM’s aim of consolidating
For more information, please contact: its position as Malaysia’s pioneer bond-
pricing agency, and to further strengthen its
position by focusing on its core business -
evaluated bond pricing.
Introduction
Global market turmoil, recession worries Notable issues from this sector include a
and widening credit spreads have all RM4.0 billion sukuk Musharakah
made their presence felt in the domestic programme by PLUS SPV Berhad
bond market. The sukuk market (“PLUS SPV”), a wholly owned special-
contracted more than 70% in 2008 - purpose vehicle of PLUS Expressway
contrary to the initial view that the Berhad (“PEB”); a RM1.5 billion
industry would remain largely insulated medium-term notes sukuk programme by
from the slump. Lingkaran Tans Kota Sdn Bhd (“Litrak”);
and RM1.0 billion Senior and Junior
A total of 39 new corporate sukuk deals - sukuk programmes by MRCB Southern
with a prospective issuance value of Link Berhad.
RM16.1 billion – were announced last
year. This accounted for 26% of the In second place, the industrial sector
domestic market’s RM61.6 billion of garnered a 14%-share of the market.
rated corporate bond issues for the same Fund-raising exercises by Hong Leong
period. Actual issuance, however, Industries Berhad, Muhibbah Engineering
declined to RM8.8 billion last year, (M) Berhad, Tanjung Offshore Berhad
compared with RM39.6 billion in 2007. and Chemical Company of Malaysia
Berhad accounted for most of the sukuk
Application of Sukuk Funding originating from this segment.
Property, Real
Estate & ABS / Structured Consumer
Construction Finance Products &
Services Banking &
Plantations 11% 9% Financial
1% 4%
Services
6%
Industrial
Products &
Services
14%
Infrastructure &
Utilities
55%
The RM4.0 billion (nominal value) sukuk Meanwhile, another sizeable transaction
programme by PLUS SPV was the largest last year was the RM1.5 billion medium-
sukuk deal in 2008. PLUS SPV is an term notes sukuk programme by Litrak. A
independent special-purpose company single-purpose company, Litrak owns
through which PEB had issued sukuk to concession rights to collect toll on the 40-
meet its funding requirements. Under this km intra-urban Lebuhraya Damansara-
transaction, PLUS SPV had issued an Puchong. Proceeds from the sukuk
initial RM1.055 billion of sukuk issuance had been used to refinance
Musharakah. PEB, on the other hand, is Litrak’s existing debts, including
an investment-holding company that is RM324.10 million of Redeemable
primarily involved in the operation of toll Unsecured Loan Stocks, and also
roads, both in Malaysia and abroad. deployed towards upgrading works on its
PEB’s domestic toll-road concessionaires concession assets, capital expenditure,
include Projek Lebuhraya Utara-Selatan working capital, and other Shariah-
Berhad, Expressway Lingkaran Tengah compliant purposes.
Sdn Bhd, Linkedua (Malaysia) Berhad
and Konsortium Lebuhraya Butterworth Notably, Menara ABS’s RM1.0 billion
Kulim (KLBK) Sdn Bhd. In addition, Islamic asset-backed sukuk Ijarah
PEB has ventured into overseas markets represents as the largest securitisation of
such as India and Indonesia, with stakes property assets to date. The transaction
in 3 toll-road concessionaires. involves the securitisation of properties
with a combined value of RM1.03 billion,
The RM16.1 billion of sukuk issues in 2008 were successfully brought to the market by 13
financial and advisory institutions. RAM Ratings’ provisional tabulation, based on data
collated from Bank Negara Malaysia’s FAST information system and the websites of the
rating agencies, indicates that CIMB Investment Bank Berhad topped the sukuk league table
last year, with a 46.4%-share. This was followed by Maybank Investment Bank Berhad and
AmInvestment Bank Berhad, with respective 13.3% and 8.6% slices of the pie.
RAM Ratings expects sukuk issuance to The latest development in the domestic
resume momentum once some semblance sukuk market - through the introduction
of normalcy returns to the global financial of new rules by Bursa Malaysia under its
markets, fuelled by the massive Listing Requirements for Islamic
investment and financing needs of the securities or sukuk and debt securities -
Gulf economies and emerging markets in will further strengthen Malaysia’s
Asian countries. Islamic finance, sukuk in standing as a leader in the sukuk market.
particular, is an emerging asset class that Under this new framework, ringgit- and
will sit well with investors throughout the foreign-denominated sukuk issues will be
world. allowed to be listed on Bursa Malaysia.
This is envisaged to enhance transparency
As a pioneer in the Islamic finance for investors, apart from offering valuable
industry, Malaysia has set the standard profiling opportunities for the sukuk
and led the way on many fronts. issuers.
Malaysian Islamic
Capital Market
Malaysian Rated Corporate Sukuk Market
League Table of Lead Managers as at 31 December 2008
RM Million %
CIMB Investment Bank Berhad 6,365 39.4%
Aseambankers Malaysia Berhad 2,432 15.1%
AmInvestment Bank Berhad 1,100 6.8%
OSK Investment Bank Berhad 800 5.0%
RHB Investment Bank Berhad 721 4.5%
MIDF Amanah Investment Bank Berhad 772 4.8%
OCBC Bank (Malaysia) Berhad 590 3.7%
Citibank Berhad 550 3.4%
Bank of Tokyo‐Mitsubishi UFJ (Malaysia) Berhad 500 3.1%
Hong Leong Bank Berhad 500 3.1%
RHB Islamic Bank Berhad 373 2.3%
Bank Muamalat Malaysia Berhad 370 2.3%
HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad 348 2.2%
Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad 250 1.5%
Kuwait Finance House (Malaysia) Berhad 250 1.5%
Affin Investment Bank Berhad 150 0.9%
KAF Discounts Berhad 70 0.4%
16,139 100%
The value of consortium issues have been equally divided by the number of lead managers of a consortium
Source : RAM Ratings/ FAST
Malaysian Islamic
Capital Market
Malaysian Islamic
Capital Market
Malaysian Islamic
Capital Market
Malaysian Islamic
Banking Market
Ringgit Sukuk
Market Report
Sukuk - Total Traded Amount for the Quarter ended 31 December 2008
Information on this page is intended solely for the purpose of providing general information on the Ringgit Bond market and is not intended for
trading purposes. None of the information constitutes a solicitation, offer, opinion, or recommendation by Bond Pricing Agency Malaysia Sdn Bhd 42
(formerly Bondweb Malaysia Sdn Bhd) (“BPAM”) to buy or sell any security, or to provide legal, tax, accounting, or investment advice or services
regarding the profitability or suitability of any security or investment. Investors are advised to consult their professional investment advisors before
making any investment decision. Materials provided on this page are provided on an "as is" basis, and while care has been taken to ensure the
accuracy and reliability of the information provided in this page, BPAM provides no warranties or representations of any kind, either express or
implied, including, but not limited to, warranties of title or implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, correctness, non-
infringement, timeliness, completeness, or that the information is always up-to-date.
TOWARDS AN INFORMED MARKET
RINGGIT SUKUK MARKET REPORT
Ringgit Sukuk
Market Report
Sukuk New Facilities created for the Quarter ended 31-Dec-2008
Maturity
Facility Code Facility Name Instrument Facility Limit
Date
Stock Name Issue Date Maturity Date Actual Issue Successful Yield
Information on this page is intended solely for the purpose of providing general information on the Ringgit Bond market and is not intended for
trading purposes. None of the information constitutes a solicitation, offer, opinion, or recommendation by Bond Pricing Agency Malaysia Sdn Bhd 43
(formerly Bondweb Malaysia Sdn Bhd) (“BPAM”) to buy or sell any security, or to provide legal, tax, accounting, or investment advice or services
regarding the profitability or suitability of any security or investment. Investors are advised to consult their professional investment advisors before
making any investment decision. Materials provided on this page are provided on an "as is" basis, and while care has been taken to ensure the
accuracy and reliability of the information provided in this page, BPAM provides no warranties or representations of any kind, either express or
implied, including, but not limited to, warranties of title or implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, correctness, non-
infringement, timeliness, completeness, or that the information is always up-to-date.
TOWARDS AN INFORMED MARKET
RINGGIT SUKUK MARKET REPORT
Ringgit Sukuk
Market Report
10 Most Active Bonds Traded between 01-Oct-2008 and 31-Dec-2008
STOCK NAME LAST TRADED LAST TRADED TOTAL
PRICE YIELD/DISCOUNT VOLUME
TRADED LAST
QTR
PROFIT-BASED GII 2/2008 30.06.2011 102.95 3.13 3263
Information on this page is intended solely for the purpose of providing general information on the Ringgit Bond market and is not intended for
trading purposes. None of the information constitutes a solicitation, offer, opinion, or recommendation by Bond Pricing Agency Malaysia Sdn Bhd 44
(formerly Bondweb Malaysia Sdn Bhd) (“BPAM”) to buy or sell any security, or to provide legal, tax, accounting, or investment advice or services
regarding the profitability or suitability of any security or investment. Investors are advised to consult their professional investment advisors before
making any investment decision. Materials provided on this page are provided on an "as is" basis, and while care has been taken to ensure the
accuracy and reliability of the information provided in this page, BPAM provides no warranties or representations of any kind, either express or
implied, including, but not limited to, warranties of title or implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, correctness, non-
infringement, timeliness, completeness, or that the information is always up-to-date.
TOWARDS AN INFORMED MARKET
RINGGIT SUKUK MARKET REPORT
Ringgit Sukuk
Market Report
5-YEAR YTM Historical Chart (weekly closing, last 6 months)
Government GII 2.81 2.83 2.9 3.03 3.11 3.17 3.2 3.26 3.55 3.82
Quasi
Khazanah 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.09 0.07 0.13 0.22 0.34 0.34 0.35
Government
Corporate AAA 0.84 0.87 1.02 1.14 1.33 1.56 1.83 2.09 2.16 2.26
Corporate AA2 1.17 1.23 1.46 1.65 1.91 2.2 2.53 2.84 2.94 3.08
Information on this page is intended solely for the purpose of providing general information on the Ringgit Bond market and is not intended for
trading purposes. None of the information constitutes a solicitation, offer, opinion, or recommendation by Bond Pricing Agency Malaysia Sdn Bhd 45
(formerly Bondweb Malaysia Sdn Bhd) (“BPAM”) to buy or sell any security, or to provide legal, tax, accounting, or investment advice or services
regarding the profitability or suitability of any security or investment. Investors are advised to consult their professional investment advisors before
making any investment decision. Materials provided on this page are provided on an "as is" basis, and while care has been taken to ensure the
accuracy and reliability of the information provided in this page, BPAM provides no warranties or representations of any kind, either express or
implied, including, but not limited to, warranties of title or implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, correctness, non-
infringement, timeliness, completeness, or that the information is always up-to-date.
Malaysian Sukuk Market Handbook
Your Guide to the Malaysian Islamic Capital Market
ISBN: 978‐983‐44255‐0‐0
Published by RAM Rating Services Berhad
As a pioneer in the Islamic finance industry, Malaysia has been setting benchmarks while
assuming a pivotal role on the sukuk pitch. The nation’s Islamic capital market has been
experiencing exponential growth, and we are well poised as the world’s most competitive
and attractive sukuk market, underscoring Malaysia’s significance as the largest and most
innovative global sukuk marketplace.
The Malaysian Sukuk Market Handbook, published by RAM Rating Services Berhad (“RAM
Ratings”), is a comprehensive guide that serves as a practical tome for institutions and
professionals keen on unlocking maximum value from the domestic Islamic capital market.
The contributors to this handbook are eminent personalities from various backgrounds,
well known in their respective fields of expertise. This handbook – the first of its kind ‐ also
strives to broaden the sukuk investor and issuer bases, and covers inter alia the applicable
Shariah principles, the Malaysian regulatory framework, the role of Shariah advisors, legal
and tax considerations, rating approaches, market infrastructure and details of hallmark
sukuk transactions.
RAM Ratings, a leading credit‐rating agency in Asia, was incorporated in 1990 as the
pioneer of the Malaysian capital market in this sphere. In sukuk transactions, our task
involves both quantitative and qualitative analysis vis‐à‐vis evaluating the financial
strength of obligor institutions with such underlying structures, as approved by Shariah
scholars. RAM Ratings’ portfolio encompasses a vast range of local and foreign corporates,
multinationals, Islamic and conventional banks, takaful and insurance companies,
government‐linked and other public‐financed entities, myriad complex investment vehicles
and the ringgit‐denominated securities they issue, structured‐finance transactions backed
by receivables or other financial assets, and sukuk. As one of the region’s most
experienced rating agencies, RAM Ratings is a leader in the provision of crucial and
independent credit opinions that are sought after by market participants as regards their
investment and financial decisions.
For further enquiries, kindly contact Mr Mohamed Firdaus Kader Mohideen at +603‐
76281018 or firdaus@ram.com.my; or Ms Noor Maliana Mansor at +603‐76281029 or
maliana@ram.com.my.
Information contained in this publication is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and correct at
the point of writing; however, its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. Opinions in this
publication are expressed from the point of view of the writers and are not necessarily those of the
Publisher. The views or opinions expressed are subject to change at any time. No statement in this
publication is to be construed as a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be copied or otherwise reproduced, repackaged,
further transmitted, transferred, disseminated, redistributed or resold or stored for subsequent use for
any such purpose, in whole or in part, in any form or manner or by any means whatsoever by any
person, without prior written consent from the Publisher and/or the writers.