Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Peppsi ™reagents
: A NEW GENERATION
and Catalysts
OF AIR-STABLE
for Facilitating
Pd preCATALYSTS
Synthesis
V O L . 3 98 , N
NOO.. 14 • 2 0 0 6
5
ROM Polymerization
in Facilitated Synthesis
Polyurea-Encapsulated
Pd–N-Heterocyclic Carbene (NHC) Catalysts
PalladiumReactions
for Cross-Coupling Catalysts
sigma-aldrich.com
New Products from Aldrich R&D
BD3–THF Solution Stabilized with NIMBA and Alkynylboronates
Me-CBS Solutions in THF Alkynylboronates participate in a variety of regio- and stereoselective
The asymmetric borane reduction of prochiral ketones catalyzed by (R)- carbon–carbon bond-forming reactions including enyne cross metathesis
or (S)-Me-CBS provides a facile method for accessing chiral secondary (CM),1 Alder-ene,2 and Dötz annulation reactions.3 Products obtained
alcohols.1 We are pleased to introduce N-isopropyl-N-methyl-tert-butylamine from these reactions are either alkenyl or arylboronates, which are active
(NIMBA) stabilized BD3–THF solutions for the preparation of isotopically coupling partners in
labeled alcohols.2 Amine-stabilized borane–THF solutions exhibit enhanced Suzuki and Heck CH3
BPin O CH3
shelf-life over those containing other stabilizers, and additionally, higher reactions. BPin = B
R O CH3
levels of enantiomeric excess are obtained.3 Deuterium-labeled alcohols CH3
may also be synthesized through (1) Kim, M.; Lee, D.
O HO D
the sequence of hydroboration– O BD3 Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
CH3 CH3 1865. (2) (a) Hansen, R'
R'
oxidation of olefins. Either method (R)-Me-CBS
Cr(CO)5
R R E. C.; Lee, D. J. Am. H3CO
of alcohol preparation gives high Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
[Ru] [Ru]+
levels of deuterium incorporation R Yield (%) ee (%) D atom % 3252. (b) Hansen, OH
into the substrate molecule. We H 100 (GC) 96.6 97.0
E. C.; Lee, D. J. Am. R' R' R
R
are also pleased to now offer CH3 100 (GC) 94.5 96.4
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
BPin BPin
R BPin
(R)- and (S)-Me-CBS as solutions 91 (isolated)
8142. (3) Davies, M.
NO2 97.8 98.1 OCH3
in THF, in addition to our toluene W. et al. J. Org. Chem. (CM) (Alder-ene)
OCH3 100 (GC) 94.2 96.1 (Dötz annulation)
2001, 66, 3525.
solutions of the same catalysts. 4
(1) Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1986. (2) Sigma-
Aldrich, patent pending. (3) (a) Nettles, S. M. et al. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2970. (b)
Aldrich Technical Bulletin, AL-218. (4) Sold under license. US4943635 and foreign
equivalents apply. End user is granted on purchase a label license to use without 3-(tert-Butyldimethylsilyloxy)-1-butyn-1-ylboronic 8
scale limitation. acid pinacol ester, 96%
674729 H3C CH3 1g $55.20
Si
Borane-d3–THF complex solution, 1.0 M in THF, 8 C16H31BO3S O 5g 193.50
stabilized with 0.005 M N-isopropyl-N-methyl-
FW: 310.31 H 3C
CH
tert-butylamine, 97.5 atom % D O 3
B
CH3
667714 1 mL $28.50 O
H3 C CH3
C4H8BD3O O BD3 5 x 1 mL 100.00
FW: 88.96
3-Methoxy-1-propyn-1-ylboronic acid pinacol ester, 96% 8
(R)-2-Methyl-CBS-oxazaborolidine solution, 1 M in THF 8 674710 H3CO 1g $45.00
O CH3
674656 5 mL $91.70 C10H17BO3 B 5 g 179.00
CH3
O
[112022-81-83] H 25 mL 312.00 FW: 196.05 H C CH3 3
C18H20BNO N B
O
Cobalt-Catalyzed Hydroazidation
Organoazides have gained considerable interest recently because of their use Potassium 2-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-2-hydroxybenzyl- 8
in click chemistry and as masked amines. Erick Carreira (ETH Hönggerberg) ideneamino)-2,2-diphenylacetate, 95%
and co-workers have developed a convenient method for preparing these 676551 Ph Ph 250 mg $38.25
useful intermediates by
Ph Ph C29H32KNO3 N CO2K 1g 114.75
Markovnikov hydroazidation
of olefins.1 The method N CO2K FW: 481.68 OH
utilizes a cobalt catalyst OH
(cat.)
prepared in situ from a Schiff R3
base and Co(BF4)2·6H2O in R1 Co(BF4)2 • 6H2O (cat.) R2
R3 + TsN3 R1 H
the presence of a silane to R2 t-BuOOH, PhSiH3 or N3
give secondary and tertiary [(CH3)2SiH]2O
up to 90%
alkyl azides in good yields.
(1) Waser, J. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8294.
Subscriptions
TABLE OF CONTENTS
To request your FREE subscription to the Pd–N-Heterocyclic Carbene (NHC) Catalysts for Cross-Coupling Reactions...................................97
Aldrichimica Acta, please contact us by: Eric Assen B. Kantchev, Christopher J. O‘Brien, and Michael G. Organ,* York University,
Toronto, Canada
Phone: 800-325-3010 (USA)
Mail: ttn: Mailroom
A
Aldrich Chemical Co., Inc.
Sigma-Aldrich Corporation
ABOUT OUR COVER
P.O. Box 355 No one will be surprised to read that
Milwaukee, WI 53201-9358 the painting on our cover, Ships Riding
on the Seine at Rouen (1872/1873,
Email: sams-usa@sial.com
oil on canvas, 37.8 × 46.6 cm), was
International customers, please contact your local painted by the archetypal Impressionist,
Sigma-Aldrich office. For worldwide contact infor Claude Monet (French, 1840–1926).
His distinctive style is recognizable,
mation, please see the inside back cover.
fresh, and still sought after over 130
The Aldrichimica Acta is also available on the years after his radical and expressive
brushwork shocked the art world in
Internet at sigma-aldrich.com.
Paris in the 1860s and 1870s.
Aldrich brand products are sold through Sigma- Monet’s devotion to the ideals of
Impressionism lasted throughout his
Aldrich, Inc. Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. warrants that its Photograph © Board of Trustees, National Gallery of Art, Washington.
long and prolific life. It is fitting that the
products conform to the information contained in word Impressionism, which defines the
this and other Sigma-Aldrich publications. Purchaser movement and style, was coined by an
must determine the suitability of the product for its art critic reviewing Monet’s painting Impression: Sunrise, 1872 (Musée Marmottan, Paris).
particular use. See reverse side of invoice or packing
slip for additional terms and conditions of sale. This delightful, small painting displays large and small sailboats comfortably resting on
the river Seine on a sunny, warm, and idyllic day. Monet’s choice of primarily soft blues and
greens creates an alluring calm and relaxed atmosphere. He characteristically captures the
illusion of moving water by suggesting with broad brushstrokes that the landscape, sky,
VOL. 39, NO. 4 • 2006
Access 40,000+
products with
one click.
T he success of your research relies heavily on having the best products for your
experiments. Tired of browsing through various catalogs and databases for the research
products you need? Look no further! Sigma-Aldrich introduces the new Chem Product
Central™, featuring the industry-leading range of 40,000+ products including cutting-edge
catalysts and ligands, novel and classical synthetic reagents, and diverse libraries of
building blocks. Unique to Chem Product Central™, all chemical products are categorized
based on compound classes and application areas for easy browsing. In addition, new
products are added on a weekly basis, providing you with the most innovative products for
your research.
Sodium dimethylphenylsilanolate 8
hydrate, 97% (N-Boc-2-pyrrolyl)dimethylsilanol, 97% 8 Sodium 2-furyldimethylsilanolate 8
C8H11NaOSi C11H19NO3Si C6H9NaO2Si
H3C CH3
FW: 174.25 Si • XH2O FW: 241.36 CH3
FW: 164.21 CH3
ONa N Si CH3 Si CH3
O
Boc OH ONa
Included in this directory are our newest boronic acids and derivatives such as
potassium methyltrifluoroborate. Molander and co-workers have demonstrated
this air- and water-stable salt to be an excellent methylation reagent for aryl halides
and pseudohalides.1,2 We are delighted to offer this useful new product, as well as
over 650 other novel boron nucleophiles for use in Suzuki coupling.
CH3 BF3K
X Cs2CO3 CH3
PdCl2(dppf)•CH2Cl2 (9 mol %)
R THF−H2O R
X = Br, OTf
up to 92%
R = Ac, NO2, NHAc, CN, COPh, CO2CH3
Reference
(1) Molander, G. A. et al. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5534. (2) Molander, G. A.; Figueroa, R.
Aldrichimica Acta 2005, 38, 49.
636312-1G 1g $35.40
Potassium cyclopentyltrifluoroborate, 8 4,5-Difluoro-2-methoxyphenylboronic 8 636312-5G 5g 124.50
97% acid
C5H9BF3K [870777-32-5] trans-(3,3-Dimethylbutenyl)boronic acid 8
BF3K F B(OH)2
FW: 176.03 C7H7BF2O3 pinacol ester, 97%
FW: 187.94 F OCH3 C12H23BO2 H3C CH3
666017-1G 1g $73.40 FW: 210.12 O
CH 3
666017-5G 5g 251.50 645184-1G 1g $84.70 B
O CH3
645184-5G 5g 283.00
667277-1G 1g $47.20
Potassium 4-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl- 8 3-Formyl-5-methylphenylboronic acid 8 667277-5G 5g 157.00
trifluoroborate, 97% [870777-33-6] OH
C7H7BF3KO trans-3-(Cyclopentyl)propenylboronic 8
BF3K C8H9BO3 H3C B
FW: 214.03 OH acid pinacol ester, 97%
HO
FW: 163.97
C14H25BO2 H3C CH3
H O FW: 236.16 O
659762-1G 1g $25.10 B
CH3
O CH3
659762-5G 5g 83.80 645338-1G 1 g $107.00
667013-1G 1g $62.90
2-Aminopyridine-5-boronic acid pinacol 8
4-Amino-3-nitrophenylboronic acid, tech. 8 ester, 97% trans-2-(3,5-Difluorophenyl)vinylboronic 8
[827614-64-2] acid pinacol ester, 97%
[89466-07-9] OH H3C CH3
C11H17BN2O2 C14H17BF2O2 H3C CH3
C6H7BN2O4 B O
OH
FW: 220.08
CH3 FW: 266.09 O
FW: 181.94 B
O CH 3 F B
CH 3
H2N O CH3
NO2 H2N N
F
651621-1G 1g $42.60 640379-1G 1g $49.00
651621-5G 5g 157.00 640379-5G 5g 158.50 669199-1G 1g $65.00
N N
extremely fruitful in opening new avenues in catalysis by simply
substituting a phosphine with an NHC.11b,d Thermochemical and
IAd
computational studies on NHC complexes of Ru14 and Ni15 have
N N N N
shown that NHCs form stronger bonds to the metal than even the
IMes SIMes most electron-rich phosphines.
The use of NHCs as ligands in Pd-mediated reactions has the
N N N N
following beneficial effects: (i) The strong σ-donating ability of
IPr SIPr NHCs results in a Pd center that is capable of oxidative addition
Ref. 3,5
Ref. 3,6 into bonds traditionally considered resistant, for example those
of chloroarenes16 or alkyl halides;17 (ii) the steric bulk of NHCs
facilitates reductive elimination in a manner analogous to that of
Figure 1. Synthetically Useful NHC Ligands Derived from Imid-
azolium (I) and 4,5-Dihydroimidazolium (SI) Salts. bulky phosphines;18 and (iii) the strong Pd–NHC bond and limited
catalyst decomposition pathways ensure that the metal is kept in a
soluble, catalytically active state with only a single NHC attached,
even at high temperatures. A caveat: the complexation of NHCs
O O to palladium is far from trivial, and the preparation of the active
R
N N
R
N N R N N R N N R catalyst is a major bottleneck in catalytic applications.
R R
R Isolated NHCs, even though persistent in the crystalline state
R N and solution,8 are highly air- and moisture-sensitive. Owing to
N
N R R N
P
N R
R the practical inconvenience of handling the free carbenes (under
R N R N R R
N O R N S
strictly inert conditions or in a glovebox), NHC surrogates are
R R also used, most often the corresponding azolium salts from
which the carbenes are generated by treatment with a strong base
N N N N N N
R R R R R R (Figure 3). 3,8,11 An additional avenue for NHC generation
Ref. 6
encompasses 1,1 elimination of simple molecules or decompo-
Ref. 5
sition of NHC dimers at high temperatures.10 The resultant
carbenes are then captured by a common palladium source
Figure 2. General Representation of Other NHC Platforms
[PdCl 2, Pd(OAc)2, Pd(dba)2, or Pd 2(dba)3]. The preparation of
(R = Alkyl or Aryl).
well-defined Pd–NHC complexes has also been the subject of
thorough scientific investigations. The strength of the Pd–NHC
bond renders ligand substitution with a preformed carbene an
excellent general route to Pd–NHC complexes.19–23 Another
N R
R N
R N N R approach is to use an imidazolium salt in the presence of base to
X– X
X = Cl, Br, I,
base HX H
X = OR, CCl3,
form the NHC in situ which is then captured by Pd.24–28 A related
BF4, PF6 HX
R N N R
heat C6F5 approach involves the use of Pd(OAc)229 or Pd–µ‑hydroxide.30
R R heat Pd R
Finally, Pd(0) species oxidatively insert into C–H, 31 C–Cl, 32
N N mL N and C–S33 bonds at the carbene carbon, leading to Pd(II)–NHC
PdLm
N N N complexes.
n
R R R
n = 1, 2
Both ligand classes, phosphines and NHCs, can be tuned
Ref. 3,8,10,11 m+n=4
by incorporating different substituents with predefined steric
Ref. 3,8,10,11 and electronic properties. In phosphines, these substituents are
attached directly to the donor atom; therefore, the steric and
electronic effects cannot be separated. NHCs allow the steric
Figure 3.General Description of NHC Generation from Various
Precursors and Their Complexation with Pd. and electronic properties to be tuned independently, because the
flanking N-substituents are not connected directly to the carbene
carbon. The N-substituents have a limited effect on the electronic
density of the carbene carbon;34,35 the heterocyclic moiety is largely
N,N'-Diarylimidazolium N,N'-Diaryl-4,5-dihydroimidazolium N,N'-Dialkylimidazolium responsible for the electronic properties of the NHC. Electronic
N+ N N+ N N+ N variations within the NHC ligand platform are small, and even
Cl– Cl– Cl– carbenes with electron-withdrawing groups retain sufficient
IPr•HCl SIPr•HCl IAd•HCl σ‑donating ability to readily insert into unactivated haloarenes.36
N+ N N+ N N+ N Therefore, the most promising avenue for the tuning of NHCs
Cl– Cl– Cl– remains the steric bulk of the substituents surrounding the metal
IMes•HCl SIMes•HCl ICy•HCl center. While phosphines and NHCs are similar electronically,
decreasing
steric bulk
Ref. 36–46
allowing for a much stronger impact of the substituents’ topology
on the metal center. A comparison of a range of imidazolium
Figure 4. NHC•HCl Precursors Used in Various in Situ Cross-
and 4,5‑dihydroimidazolium NHC precursors (Figure 4) in the
Coupling Protocols.
context of a number of cross-coupling reactions is shown in
99
Table 1.36–46 The bulkiest N,N’-diaryl ligand precursors, IPr•HCl reactions, as each complex is activated by simple alkene or p-
ligand activity. The bulky carbene ligands are especially suitable Negishi 76c 2.8 – 85 1.2 0.6 – 37
for the stabilization of coordinatively unsaturated, monoligated
Pd–NHC species. Analogous monoligated Pd–bulky phosphine Heck–Mizoroki 66 94 13 90d 64 2 90 39
species are considered to be responsible for the high levels of Sonogashira (ArX) 80 87 62 60 66 56 – 40
activity when such ligands are used in cross-coupling reactions.47
Diligated Pd(II)–NHC complexes have a much lower activity than Sonogashira (RX) 67 – – 58 e <5 e 80 – 41
their Pd(0) counterparts as a result of the higher affinity of the Buchwald–Hartwig 98 22 <5 – – – – 42
NHCs to Pd(II) than to Pd(0),36 leading to a much higher stability
CH2(CN) 2 Arylation 70 f 75 <5 – – – – 43
of the Pd(II)–(NHC)2 species. Pd(II) precatalysts can be used
only when another, more labile ligand, rather than a second NHC, Arene
Dehalogenation
45 46 – 56 96 g 49 30 44
is present. Pd complexes with chelating and pincer carbenes11f
Alkyne Dimerization 76 97 34 14 88 45 34 45
are even more stable then their monodentate counterparts.4 In
general, they are of limited use in catalysis, even though, in Tsuji–Trost 77 25 – – – – 0h 46
selected cases at high temperatures, 48–50 very high turnover a
The numbers shown represent typical percent yields in the reaction types listed.
numbers and frequencies have been observed. Considering that b
Using 1 mol % of Pd 2 (dba) 3 ; the standard conditions resulted in only a 53% yield.
Other Pd sources used (4 mol %) led to the following yields: 75% (Pd(OAc) 2), 74%
the chelating NHCs require a higher synthetic investment, the
c
(PdBr2), 40% (Pd(O2CCF 3 ) 2), 19% (PdCl2), and 6% ([(π‑allyl)PdCl] 2). d 4% yield using
development of general and useful catalysts has been focused 2 mol % of Pd(dba) 2. e The corresponding BF4 salts were used. f The corresponding 2,4,6-
trisubstituted analogue was used. Surprisingly, IPr•HCl led to <5% yields. We reason that
exclusively on monodentate carbenes. this is due to the failure to form the active catalyst rather than to intrinsic low catalytic
activity. g At 2 mol %, PdCl2(PhCN) 2 and Pd(OAc) 2 gave 16% and 2% yields, respectively.
h
N,N’‑Diisopropylimidazolium chloride was used.
3. Development of Well-Defined, Highly Active,
Monoligated Pd–NHC Precatalysts
A number of studies have shown that: (i) IPr and, to a lesser
extent, IMes as well as their saturated analogs, SIPr and R2 R1
N N
R1
SIMes, show the highest activity and have the widest general R2 R1 R 1 R2
R1 O
applicability; (ii) a monoligated Pd complex is optimal; and N
R1
THF O
Pd
:
Pd
π-allyl Cl
82–95%
is highly modular, allowing a number of N,N’-diaryl 56 or
IPr SIPr IPr IPr IPr dialkyl56b NHCs, as well as substituents on the allyl ligand, to be
Pd
Cl
Pd
Cl
Pd
Cl Me Pd Cl Pd
Cl introduced (Figure 6). These complexes are highly catalytically
Me Me Ph active in a number of important cross-coupling reactions. IPr
3 4 5 6 7
adducts of simple Pd salts, such as Pd(OAc)2 and PdCl2, are also
Ref. 56
Ref. 55,56 known. Nolan has prepared the IPr complexes of Pd(OAc)2 and
Pd(O2CCF3)2 by treatment of the Pd salt with the free carbene
Figure 6. π-Allyl–Pd–(S)IPr Complexes. IPr under anhydrous conditions.23,57 Almost all of the preceding
precatalysts have been prepared by utilizing the isolated, highly
moisture- and air-sensitive carbenes.
Very recently, we reported the synthesis of novel NHC–
R1 R1 PdCl 2 –3-chloropyridine complexes, which fulfill all the
Cl
(neat)
N N
criteria for a general and useful coupling catalyst (eq 1).58 This
R1 R1 R 2
R1 R1 R2
N+ N N
Cl Pd Cl multicomponent reaction sequence proceeds through the in
R2 R1 Cl– R1 R2 PdCl2, K2CO3
80 °C
N situ formation of a soluble (3‑chloropyridine)2PdCl 2 complex.59
Cl
However, the mechanism of carbene transfer to this intermediate
is unknown. The reaction is easily performed on a kilogram scale,
R1 R2 Precatalyst Yield
does not require anhydrous conditions or inert atmosphere, and
Me
Et
Me
H
PEPPSI™-IMes 91%
PEPPSI™-IEt 98%
the excess 3‑chloropyridine can be recycled through distillation.
Ref. 58 i-Pr H PEPPSI™-IPr 97% The three isolated products shown in equation 1 are indefinitely
stable to the atmosphere, yet can be easily activated under the
Ref. 58 conditions of various cross-coupling reactions, generating the
eq 1
active catalyst, a monoligated Pd(0)–NHC species. The pyridine
plays an important role during formation of the complex,
contributes to its stability, and readily dissociates upon reduction
of Pd(II) to Pd(0). Therefore, we coined the name PEPPSI ™
(Pyridine-Enhanced Precatalyst Preparation, Stabilization, and
IPr•HCl (8 mol %) Initiation) for these complexes in order to concisely describe
Pd2(dba)3 (2 mol %)
RBr + R'ZnBr R–R' these effects.60
THF–NMP (2:1)
1.3 equiv rt, 24 h
4. Synthetic Applications of Pd–NHC Catalysts in
R R' Yield Cross-Coupling Reactions
The cross-coupling methodology encompasses an array
phthalimidyl–(CH2)4 n-Bu 65%
TMSC≡C(CH2)2 (OCH2CH2O)CH(CH2)2 61% of transformations that create a new single bond between
CyCH2 NCC(CH3)2(CH2)4 63% nucleophilic (usually an organometallic derivative, amine, or
NC(CH2)5 EtO2C(CH2)3 62% alcohol) and electrophilic (an organic halide or pseudohalide)
Cl(CH2)6 NCC(CH3)2(CH2)4 81%
NCC(CH3)2(CH2)4 CyCH2 84% reaction partners.61 The reaction is thermodynamically driven
by the formation of an inorganic salt. Even though a number of
Ref. 37a
metals have been used to mediate this process, Pd has attained
Ref. 37 the most prominent position due to its unsurpassed versatility.62
In order for the Pd-assisted cross-coupling methodology to
eq 2 attain its full powers, the versatility of Pd catalysts must be
matched by high levels of activity, allowing a wide range of
substrates, from most to least active, to be converted in high
turnover under conditions that are as mild as possible. Besides
PEPPSI™-IPr (1 mol %)
RX + R'ZnBr R–R' the high catalytic activity, practical considerations such as the ease
THF–NMP or DMI (2:1 or 1:3)
LiCl or LiBr, rt, 24 h of synthesis, commercial availability and price, as well as user-
friendliness and environmental impact must be addressed before
Yield for X =
the Pd–NHC cross-coupling methodology can become widely
R R' Cl Br I OTf OTs OMs used in academia and industry. With the performance-enhancing
Ph(CH2)3 n-Bu 88% 100% 68% ––– 100% 100% NHC ligands incorporated into well-defined and easily prepared
Ph
n-Hep
n-Hep 100%
Ph
100% 95% 100% 0% 0% complexes, the goal of identifying a user-friendly and universal
70% 100% 100% ––– 90% 87%
4-Tol 4-MeOC6H4 80% 88% 73% 71% 0% 0% cross-coupling catalyst is now within reach.
Ref. 66
The coupling of Zn, Al, or Zr organometallic derivatives with
Ref. 66 organic electrophiles (the Negishi coupling) 63 is one of the
eq 3
most versatile cross-coupling reactions because of to the high
activity and ready availability of the nucleophilic partners,
101
making it very suitable for the preparation of complex, sensitive methodology to aryl 51 and alkyl70 halides using monoligated
were obtained in high yields. To highlight the high activity of the sp2–sp3 CO2Et
PEPPSI™-IPr precatalyst, the coupling of the sterically hindered O
N
Cl + ZnBr, 98%
2,4,6-triisopropylphenylzinc chloride with o-chlorotoluene N
Boc
CO2Et
CN
O
proceeded in 90% yield at 60 °C, the lowest temperature recorded F
O
with any protocol for preparing this compound. Cl + ZnBr, 87% Br + ZnBr, 83% OTf + ZnBr, 81%
To the best of our knowledge, the Negishi coupling promoted by (no LiCl or LiBr necessary)
sp2–sp2
PEPPSI™-IPr encompasses the broadest substrate range achieved MeO
with a single catalytic protocol, regardless of ligand system. For OMe
optimal results, slight variations of the reaction conditions may
be necessary. In general, the reaction proceeds well in THF– Cl + ZnCl, 60 °C, 89% Cl + ZnCl, 60 °C, 90% Br + ZnCl, 96%
PEPPSI™-IPr (2 mol %) coupling (eq 6).71 This protocol is suitable for a wide range
R1Cl + R2MgBr (1.5 equiv) R1–R2
Method A or B, rt, 24 h of difficult substrates such as alkyl chlorides and sterically
Method A: THF–DME (1:1), LiCl (2 equiv). Method B: THF–DMI (2:1). hindered or heteroaromatic halides. Both aryl and alkyl chlorides
MeO are converted into the corresponding coupling products when
Me3Si OEt
Ph
Ph Ph treated with aryl Grignard reagents in THF–DME or THF–DMI
EtO 5 3 2
A: 70%, B: 82% A: 90% B: 100% B: 100%
at room temperature. In challenging substrate combinations,
MeO such as the coupling of 2,6-Me2C6H3Cl with 2-MeOC6H4MgBr,
F
N
Ph Ph MeO
addition of LiCl and increasing the temperature to 70 °C are
S N N often necessary.
B: 100% B: 100% A: 85% B: 60%
N
Boc
N
4.3. The Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling
OMe OMe OMe OMe
S The cross-coupling of organoboron derivatives with organic
N N
electrophiles (the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling)72 is probably the
B: 60% B: 83% A (70 °C): 90% A: 85% most widely used cross-coupling protocol due to the commercial
Ref. 71 availability of a wide selection of solid, air- and moisture-
Ref. 71 tolerant boronic acids. In addition, the byproducts formed are
nontoxic and the reaction proceeds well in a wide range of
eq 6 solvents including environmentally friendly simple alcohols and
water. The reaction is tolerant of a wide range of functionality.
The addition of a stoichiometric amount of base is necessary,
presumably for the activation of the boron derivative. The nature
Ar1Cl + Ar2B(OH)2
Method A–D
Ar1–Ar2
of the solvent and base has a high impact on the success of the
Cy coupling, especially in challenging cases.
O O Cy N+ N Arylboronic acids are the most frequently used nucleophilic
N +
N
N+ N Cl– partners in the Suzuki coupling. High levels of activity in the
OTf–
Cl– Cl– coupling of aryl iodides, bromides, and activated aryl chlorides
Cy N+ N with simple arylboronic acids have been recorded for a number
Cy
IBiox6•HOTf 1 2 of Pd–NHC catalysts.22b,28,32,48a,73,74 In addition, the stability of
the Pd–NHC species has been exploited in terms of catalyst
Holly: immobilization on polymer supports75 or in ionic liquids.76
Please append E1_Organ_Eq07_Tbl.doc to this graphic.
Yield
Aryl chlorides are attractive as feedstock for industrial cross-
Ar1 Ar2 NHC Salt Pd Source Method (%) Ref. coupling reactions due to their low cost and wide availability,
4-MeC6H4 4-MeOC6H4 IPr•HCl Pd(dba) 2 (1 mol %) A 99 38 but are much less reactive than aryl bromides and iodides. Not
4-MeC6H4 4-MeOC6H4 IMes•HCl Pd(OAc) 2 (1 mol %) A 80 38 surprisingly, the development of catalysts for the Suzuki cross-
4-MeC6H4 4-MeOC6H4 IPr•HCl Pd(dba) 2 (3 mol %) B 91 77 coupling of unactivated chloroarenes has attracted considerable
2-MeOC6H4 Ph IPr•HCl Pd(dba) 2 (3 mol %) B 78 77 attention.16 Pd–NHC catalysts produced in situ from imidazolium
2-MeOC6H4 Ph 1 Pd(OAc) 2 (2 mol %) C 98 80
salts and common Pd sources have shown high activities in cross-
4-MeC6H4 2-MeC6H4 IPr•HCl Pd(dba) 2 (1 mol %) A 97 38
couplings of simple aryl chlorides with arylboronic acids. Nolan
and co-workers have conducted extensive studies on the Suzuki–
4-MeC6H4 2-MeC6H4 IMes•HCl Pd(OAc) 2 (1 mol %) A 50 38
Miyaura coupling of chloroarenes using a number of N,N’-
4-MeC6H4 2-MeC6H4 IMes•HCl Pd(OAc) 2 (2.5 mol %) A 60 79
diarylimidazolium salts. Under optimized conditions—IPr•HCl
4-MeC6H4 2-MeC6H4 2 Pd(OAc) 2 (2.5 mol %) A 99 79
and Pd(dba)2 or IMes•HCl and Pd(OAc)2 in dioxane with Cs2CO3
2-MeC6H4 Ph IPr•HCl Pd(dba) 2 (3 mol %) B 79 77 as the base—substituted biphenyls were synthesized in high yields
2-MeC6H4 Ph IBiox6•HOTf Pd(OAc) 2 (3 mol %) D 83 81 at 80 °C (eq 7).38 Independently, Caddick, Cloke, and co-workers
2-MeC6H4 Ph 1 Pd(OAc) 2 (2 mol %) C 99 80 employed the same catalyst precursor, IPr•HCl and Pd(dba)2, in a
2,6-Me2C6H3 Ph IBiox6•HOTf Pd(OAc) 2 (3 mol %) D 79 81 biphasic mixture of toluene and methanol using NaOMe.77 Even
2,6-Me2C6H3 Ph 1 Pd(OAc) 2 (2 mol %) C 90 80 though the temperature of this protocol was only 40 °C, the use
2,5-Me2C6H3 Ph IPr•HCl Pd(dba) 2 (1 mol %) A 95 38 of two solvents and 10 mol % of tetra-n-butylammonium bromide
2,5-Me2C6H3 Ph IMes•HCl Pd(OAc) 2 (1 mol %) A 94 38
(TBAB) as an additive limits its usefulness. In a very elegant
2,5-Me2C6H3 Ph 2 Pd(OAc) 2 (2.5 mol %) A 84 79
study, Fairlamb et al. were able to enhance the performance of
this catalytic protocol by using Pd 2(dba)3 analogues prepared from
2,5-Me2C6H3 2-MeC6H4 IBiox6•HOTf Pd(OAc) 2 (3 mol %) D 94 81
4,4’-disubstituted dibenzylideneacetones (dba) with electron-
4-MeO2CC6H4 Ph IPr•HCl Pd(dba) 2 (1 mol %) A 98 38
donating substituents.78 Zhang and Trudell developed chelating
4-MeO2CC6H4 Ph IMes•HCl Pd(OAc) 2 (1 mol %) A 99 38
IMes analogs in different topologies.79 The bis(imidazolium) salt
4-MeO2CC6H4 Ph 2 Pd(OAc) 2 (2.5 mol %) A 99 79 2 was found to be highly active in Suzuki couplings of unactivated
4-MeOC6H4 Ph IPr•HCl Pd(dba) 2 (1 mol %) A 99 38 aryl chlorides under the conditions developed by Nolan (see
4-MeOC6H4 Ph IMes•HCl Pd(OAc) 2 (1 mol %) A 85 38 above). Very recently, Andrus and co-workers disclosed a novel
N-phenanthryl family of NHC precursors. The most active
VOL. 39, NO. 4 • 2006
Method A: Cs 2CO3, dioxane, 80 °C. Method B: KOMe, MeOH–PhMe, TBAB (10%), ligand, 1, led to facile biphenyl formation at room temperature
40 °C. Method C: KF/18-crown-6, THF, 50 °C. Method D: CsF, THF, rt, 24 h. with Pd(OAc)2 in THF using KF/18-crown-6 as the base.80 Even
though the yields were moderate to high at room temperature,
eq 7
increasing the temperature to 50 °C led to a significant increase
103
in yields and a shortening of the reaction times. The pentacyclic polysubstituted derivatives, and sterically hindered biaryls were
Ref. 58 or 66??
Method A–D
Pd 2(dba)3 catalyst.89
R1X + R2B(OH)2 (1.1–2.0 equiv) R1–R2 The coupling of boronic esters has so far only been reported
by Andrus’s group (eq 11).80,88,90,91 The ligand precursor 1, in
R1 X R2 Method
Yield
(%) Ref.
the presence of Pd(OAc)2 , promoted the coupling of a range
4-t-Bu-cyclohexen-1-yl Cl Ph A, 50 oC 92 80
of deactivated, sterically challenging aryl chlorides with the
Holly:
4-t-Bu-cyclohexen-1-yl Br Ph A 90 80
pinacol ester of arylboronic acids.80 Moreover, the borylation
Please append E1_Organ_Eq10_Tbl.doc to this drawing of arenediazonium salts with bis(pinacolato)borane, using the
4-t-Bu-cyclohexen-1-yl I Ph A 98 80
catalyst produced from SIPr•HCl and Pd(OAc)2 (1:1), proceeded
4-t-Bu-cyclohexen-1-yl OTf Ph A 89 80
in high yield in THF at room temperature in the absence of
cyclopenten-1-yl Cl 2,6-(MeO) 2C6H3 A, 50 oC 68 80
base.
4-Et 2NC6H4 N2BF4 1-naphthyl C 87 19 Alkyl catechol-88 and pinacolboranes91 were chemoselectively
4-MeOC6H4 N2BF4 Ph B 97 88 cross-coupled with arenediazonium salts by Andrus and co-
4-MeOC6H4 N2BF4 Ph C 62 19 workers using the SIPr–Pd(OAc)2 protocol in the presence
4-MeC6H4 N2BF4 4-MeOC6H4 B 89 88 of an alkyl bromide. Especially noteworthy is the coupling of
4-MeC6H4 SO2Cl 4-MeOC6H4 D 65 89 cyclohexyl pinacolborane.91 The 1–Pd(OAc)2 system successfully
4-MeC6H4 N2BF4 (E)-PhCH=CH B 86 88 promoted the coupling of methylboroxine with aryl and vinyl
4-MeC6H4 SO2Cl (E)-PhCH=CH D 48 89
chlorides.80 Fürstner and Leitner have shown that Pd–NHC
4-PhC(O)C6H4 N2BF4 4-t-BuC6H4 B 86 88
catalysts are suitable for the coupling of B‑alkyl- (including allyl
and cyclopropyl) and B‑vinyl-B-methoxy-9-BBN adducts with a
1-naphthyl SO2Cl 4-MeC6H4 D 82 89
variety of aryl chlorides.92 IPr•HCl was the ligand precursor of
Method A: 1 (4 mol %), Pd(OAc) 2 (2 mol %), KF/18-crown-6, THF, rt, <16 h. Method B:
SIPr•HCl (2 mol %), Pd(OAc) 2 (2 mol %), THF, 0 °C or rt, <3.5 h. Method C: [IMesPd(NQ)] 2
choice.
(1 mol %), MeOH, 50 °C. Method D: IMes•HCl (6 mol %), Pd2(dba) 3 (1.5 mol %), Na2CO3, The activation of alkyl halides has been less successful.
THF, reflux, 15–35 h.
IMes–Pd(OAc)2 was employed by Nolan’s group for the coupling
eq 10 of activated benzyl and allyl halides with phenylboronic acid
(t-BuOK in technical 2-propanol at room temperature).23 The
reaction times were generally short and yields excellent. Ligand
Pd(OAc)2
O (2 mol %) 1 also showed excellent activity in the coupling of benzyl
R1 X + R2 B (1.1 equiv) R1–R2
O Method A–C chloride.80 The attempts of Bedford et al. to couple PhCH 2CH2Br
Method A: 1 (4 mol %), KF/18-crown-6, THF–H2O, 50 °C, <16 h (Ref. 80). with PhB(OH)2 using the SIMes or SIPr palladacycle complexes
Method B: SIPr•HCl (2 mol %), THF, rt, <3.5 h (Ref. 88,90). Method C:
SIPr•HCl (2 mol %), CsF, THF, 60 °C (Ref. 91). 4 and 5 (Figure 7) failed.93,94 These palladacycles also showed
unsatisfactory performance in the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of
O
t-Bu CN Ph B
biaryls: even though aryl bromides coupled well, the yields with
O
aryl chlorides were around 10% or less.93 Recently, Caddick,
Ph Me H2N Cloke, and co-workers described the application of an in situ
Cl Cl + (MeBO)3 Cl N2BF4
A: 91% A (rt): 91% A: 81% B: 63% generated Pd–IPr catalyst77 in alkyl–alkyl and alkyl–vinyl cross-
Br MeO couplings of B-alkyl- or B-vinyl-9-BBN derivatives activated
O
B
with t-BuOK. AgOTf was required as additive. Despite the low-
O
to-moderate yields, this landmark work has paved the way for a
NH2 NH2
Br
O successful alkyl–alkyl Suzuki cross-coupling reaction.
N2BF4 N2BF4 + 2 Br Br
B: 95% B: 80% R B
O
C: 81% C: 89% Encouraged by the facile Negishi66 and Kumada–Tamao–
Ref. 80,88,90,91
Corriu71 alkyl–alkyl cross-couplings, we treated Ph(CH 2)3Br
with 1.1 equiv of tri-n-butylborane in the presence of 1 mol %
Ref. 80,88,90,91 of PEPPSI ™ -IPr under the standard Suzuki–Miyaura cross-
coupling conditions (t-BuOK, technical 2-propanol, room
eq 11
temperature). We were pleased to measure a quantitative yield
of the coupling product, n-heptylbenzene, in less than 5 min!
PEPPSI™-IEt and PEPPSI™-IMes led to lower yields and slower
Ph reaction rates (eq 12).58,71 Such fine discrimination by ligand size
N IPr
Ph N N Ph was not observed for the aryl–aryl Suzuki–Miyaura coupling:
Me2N Pd Cl
all three precatalysts were highly effective.58 Interestingly, the
Pd OAc
P yields and rates were very similar regardless of whether a Zn
o-Tol o-Tol 3 or B nucleophile was employed, which led us to conclude that
SIMes SIPr they reflect the intrinsic reactivity, rather than external factors,
[2,4-(t-Bu)2C6H3O]2P Pd Cl [2,4-(t-Bu)2C6H3O]2P Pd Cl of the NHC ligands, with the bulkier ligands leading to faster
O O reductive elimination. In the case of the more aggressive alkyl
Grignard reagents, PEPPSI ™-IEt resulted in only an 8% yield
t-Bu t-Bu t-Bu t-Bu
4 5 compared to 31% and 34% in the milder Suzuki–Miyaura or
Negishi couplings. We propose that the catalyst decomposition
VOL. 39, NO. 4 • 2006
4.4. The Coupling of Si and Sn Organometals and Fu.41 A variety of functional groups and substituents were
a Pd–NHC catalyst was published by Caddick, Cloke, and co- 2-Pyr Br Ph Si(MeO) 3 81
workers: a single example of the coupling of a trisubstituted 2-Pyr Cl Ph Si(MeO) 3 81
alkene carrying a bromo, iodo, and ester substituents using
(ItBu)2Pd as the Pd–NHC catalyst (eq 14).100 As expected, the 4-MeC(O)C6H4 Br CH2=CH SnMe3 92
coupling occurred at the vinyl iodide site (entry 6, eq 14). Using 4-MeC(O)C6H4 Cl CH2=CH SnMe3 83
a preformed, monoligated PdI2 complex (6, 1 mol %) containing 4-MeC(O)C6H4 Br CH2=CH Si(MeO) 3 100 b
simultaneously an N‑acyl-N’‑methyl NHC and N-methylimidazole
4-MeC(O)C6H4 Cl CH2=CH Si(MeO) 3 100 b
ligands, Batey et al. reported the Sonogashira reaction of simple
4-MeOC6H4 Br CH2=CH SnMe3 69
bromo- and iodoarenes with terminal acetylenes in the presence
4-MeOC6H4 Cl CH2=CH SnMe3 15
of CuI (2 mol %) and PPh 3 as co-ligand.101 A similar approach
was taken by Andrus and co-workers: the catalyst prepared 4-MeC6H4 Br CH2=CH SnMe3 98
from the bulky imidazolium salt 1 and Pd(PPh 3)2Cl 2 promoted 4-MeC6H4 Cl CH2=CH SnMe3 41
the coupling of various iodo- and bromosubstituted arenes and 2,4,6-Me3C6H2 Br CH2=CH SnMe3 25
alkenes with terminal acetylenes.102 Surprisingly, SIPr•HCl a
1.1 and 2–3 equivalents of the organotin and organosilicon reagents, respectively, were
showed only moderate activity. Another example of a copper- employed. b Percent conversion.
et al.29c
The Sonogashira coupling of terminal acetylenes with alkyl Ref. 97,98
bromides and iodides—a milder alternative to the uncatalyzed,
eq 13
direct substitution process—was first published by Eckhardt
106
Method A–E
respectively.92 Similarly, Yang and Nolan explored the coupling
R1X + HC≡CR2 R1–C≡CR2 of trimethylsilylalkynes with chlorobenzene and deactivated
bromoarenes in the presence of a catalyst prepared in situ from
N t-Bu t-Bu
IMes•HCl and Pd(OAc)2.40 Even though the reaction proceeded
N N
N N N N well under copper-free conditions, the addition of CuI facilitated
O
I Pd I N
Pd
N Pd the process.
N N N
I I
t-Bu t-Bu
6 N 7 (It Bu)2Pd 4.6. Enolate Arylation
Among cross-coupling reactions, enolate arylation103 is unique
in a number of respects. It is well established that, although
Yield the alkylation of enolates is facile, the arylation with simple,
Holly:
R1 X R2 Method (%) Ref.
unactivated aryl halides is impossible without the help of a
4-MeC(O)C6H4 Br Ph A 76 29c
Please append E1_Organ_Eq14_Tbl.doc to this equation transition metal. Palladium-catalyzed enolate arylation is the only
4-MeC(O)C6H4 I Ph B 95 101
method that allows the formation of useful α-arylated ketones,
4-MeC(O)C6H4 Br Ph B 99 101
esters, nitriles, and amides from simple aryl halides. Moreover,
4-MeC(O)C6H4 I Ph C 87 102 if suitably substituted reaction partners are used, a new tertiary or
4-MeC(O)C6H4 Br Ph C 81 102 quaternary chiral center can be established, raising the possibility
(Z)-EtO2CCBr=CH I TMS D 85 100 of enantioselective catalysis. Hence, this synthetically important
4-MeOC6H4 I t-Bu B 93 101 transformation has attracted considerable attention.
4-MeOC6H4 Br t-Bu B 97 101 Even though the first examples of this reaction were published
2,6-Me2C6H3 Br Me2C(OH) C 80 102 back in 1997 independently by the groups of Hartwig,104
MeC(O)(CH2) 4 I Cl(CH2) 4 E 70 41
Buchwald,105 and Miura106 using ketone enolates and chelating
[O(CH2) 2O]CH(CH2) 2 Br AcO(CH2) 3 E (60 oC) 58 41
or bulky phosphines as well as ligandless conditions (Miura), the
Pd–NHC protocol is much more recent. Nolan and co-workers
NC(CH2) 3 Br t-Bu E 70 41
have shown that well-defined monoligated IPr–Pd complexes
cyclohexen-1-yl Br cyclohexen-1-yl C 71 102
are efficient catalysts for the arylation of simple ketones with
Method A: 7 (1 mol %), Et 3N, 90 oC, 48 h. Method B: 6 (1 mol %), PPh3 (1 mol %), CuI unactivated aryl chlorides, bromides, iodides, and triflates using
(2 mol %), DMF, 2–24 h. For ArI: Et 3N, rt. For ArBr: Cs2CO3, 80 oC. Method C: 1 (3 mol
%), Pd(PPh3) 2Cl2 (3 mol %), t‑BuOK/18-crown-6, THF, 2.0–6.5 h. For ArI: rt. For ArBr: t-BuONa (eq 15).55,56c,86,107,108 A variety of functional groups (with
65 oC. Method D: (ItBu) 2Pd (1 mol %), CuI (0.2 equiv), (i-Pr) 2NEt, DMF, rt. Method E:
IAd•HCl (10 mol %), [(π-allyl)PdCl] 2 (2.5 mol %), CuI (7.5 mol %), Cs2CO3, DMF–Et 2O, 45
the exception of nitrile and aldehyde)108 are tolerated on the arene
o
C, 16 h. moiety, and sterically hindered or heterocyclic substrates gave
moderate-to-high yields. With respect to ketones, aryl–alkyl,
eq 14 dialkyl, and cyclic representatives are all suitable. Strict control
of the amount of ketone and base is needed to suppress multiple
O O arylations; typically, monoarylated products are obtained in
R1 precatalyst (1 mol %)
ArX + R2
Ar
R2 high yields in the presence of 1.1 equiv of the carbonyl partner
t-BuONa, dioxane or THF
1.1 equiv 50–70 °C, 0.5–24 h R1 and 1.1 equiv of the base. The reaction has also been performed
under microwave conditions.86 Introducing substituents α to
Yield
Ar X R1 R2 Precatalyst (%) the carbonyl group usually has a detrimental effect on the
4-Tol F Me Ph IprPd(OAc) 2 0 coupling. Consequently, in unsymmetrical ketones, arylation
Holly:
4-Tol Cl Me Ph IprPd(OAc) 2 96 occurs preferentially at the least sterically hindered carbon. For
4-Tol
Please append E1_Organ_Eq15_Tbl.doc to this equation
Br Me Ph IprPd(OAc) 2 92 example, arylation of 2-butanone with chlorobenzene leads to
4-Tol I Me Ph IprPd(OAc) 2 96
a 4:1 distribution of methyl vs methylene arylation (10:1 under
4-Tol OTf Me Ph 93
microwave conditions).86 An important limitation of this method
SIprPd(π-C3H5)Cl
is that quaternary α carbons are not accessible.
4-Tol Cl Me Et 3 90
Hartwig and co-workers explored the arylation of ester or
4-Tol Cl Me 4-TolCH(Me) IprPd(π-C3H5)Cl 88
amide enolates with a variety of aryl bromides and chlorobenzene,
2,4,6-Me3C6H2 Br Me Et IprPd(OAc) 2 92
relying on catalysts formed in situ from SIPr•HCl and Pd 2(dba)3.109
2,4,6-Me3C6H2 Br Me Ph 3 85 While tert-butyl acetate and propionate reacted smoothly with
2,4,6-Me3C6H2 Br Me Et SIprPd(π-C3H5)Cl 91 a range of aryl bromides, methyl isobutyrate resulted in poor
Ph Cl – (CH2) 4 – IprPd(acac)Cl 86 yields. However, the intramolecular arylation of the 2-bromo-
Ph Cl – (CH2) 4 – 3 72 N-methylanilide of isobutyric acid proceeded in quantitative
Ph Br – (CH2) 4 – 3 68 yields with both IPr•HCl and SIPr•HCl.110 The more sterically
2-Tol Cl H N-Me-pyrrolidin-2-yl IprPd(OAc) 2 46 hindered carbonyl compounds generally required higher catalyst
pyridin-3-yl Cl Me Ph 3 76
loadings (up to 5 mol %). Thus far, nitrile arylation has been
pyridin-3-yl Cl Me Ph IprPd(acac)Cl 89
explored only in the case of malononitrile. A range of aromatic
chlorides and bromides were converted to the corresponding
pyridin-3-yl Cl Me Ph SIprPd(π-C3H5)Cl 86
2-arylmalononitriles in excellent yields using NaH as base and
2-Tol Cl – (CH2) 3CH(OMe) – IprPd(OAc) 2 17
pyridine as solvent.43
VOL. 39, NO. 4 • 2006
defined palladium catalysts in conditions very similar to the in Method A: SIPr•HBF4 (0.08–2 mol %), Pd(dba)2 i-Pr
Method A: SIPr•HBF
(0.08–2 (0.08–2 mol
mol %),4 t-BuONa, DME,%), Pd(dba)
rt–55 °C, <20 h N+ N
situ protocol just described. Caddick, Cloke, and co-workers
2
(0.08–2(Ref.
mol %), Method B:DME,
118).t-BuONa, IPr•HCl or SIMes•HCl
rt–55 ºC, <20 h (2–
4 molMethod
%), Pd2(dba) (1 mol %), i-Pr i-Pr Cl–
have shown that homoleptic Pd(NHC)2 complexes (ItBu)2Pd (Ref. 118). B: 3IPr•HCl or dioxane, 100 °C,
SIMes•HCl
< 24 h (Ref. 42a). Method C: SIPr•HCl (4 mol
(2– 4 mol %), Pd (dba) 3 (1 mol %), dioxane,
and (SIPr)2Pd are excellent catalysts for the amination of aryl %), Pd2(dba)2 3 (1 mol
100 ºC,h < 24 h (Ref.Method
(Ref. 119).
%), LiHMDS, THF, rt, <24
42a). Method C: %),
D: 13 (4 mol SIPr•HCl i-Pr
i-Pr Cl–
N+ N
chlorides. At 100 oC, a number of N-mono- and N,N-disubstituted (4 mol %),
110
Pd3 2(4
Pd2(dba)
°C, <41
(dba)
mol 3%),(1t-BuONa,
h (Ref. 120).
mol %),
THF, rt, <24 h (Ref. 119 ). Method D: 13
LiHMDS,
dioxane, 100–
i-Pr
anilines were obtained in excellent yields within 1 h using (4 mol %), Pd2(dba) 3 (4 mol %), t-BuONa, dioxane,
Ref. 42,118–120
13
(SIPr)2Pd and SIPr–Pd–P(2-Tol)3.84,99 The monoligated NHC– 100–110 ºC, <41 h (Ref. 120).
VOL. 39, NO. 4 • 2006
mono- and diaminocarbenes, prepared by Fürstner and co- 5. Conclusions and Future Directions
Pd–N-Heterocyclic Carbene (NHC) Catalysts for Cross-Coupling Reactions
workers, efficiently catalyzed the amination of bromobenzene For the past 11 years, Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions have
and 2-chloropyridine with morpholine (47–100% yields).32 Nolan benefited enormously from the introduction of N-heterocyclic
and co-workers have exerted a considerable effort towards the carbenes as ligands. The bulky carbenes IPr and SIPr, introduced
development of Buchwald–Hartwig amination protocols with almost right at the start, have repeatedly been proven the most
a number of monoligated Pd–NHC complexes. 55,56a,d,87,107,121 active and widely applicable NHC ligands, not just for Pd, but for
The coupling of deactivated and sterically hindered substrates other metals as well. Attempts to synthesize better-performing
proceeded well even at room temperature. At 80 oC, decreasing ligands have not been successful thus far.36 The ligand precursors
the amount of catalyst to 0.001–1 mol % still led to amination for IPr and especially SIPr are pricey, and preparation of ligands
yields in the 90% range. The SIPr–PdCl(�-C3H4Ph) complex was that are cheaper yet retain or exceed the high levels of activity of
the most active and versatile precatalyst to emerge from these (S)IPr will be an important contribution to the field.
studies, usually achieving a greater than 95% yield within 2 A closely related issue is the economical preparation of well-
hours.56a defined, user-friendly, high-performance Pd–NHC complexes
PEPPSI™-IPr is also highly active in the Buchwald–Hartwig that are activated easily when submitted to the cross-coupling
amination (eq 18). With 2 mol % of PEPPSI ™-IPr, a variety of reaction conditions. The primary advantage of the PEPPSI ™
unactivated, sterically hindered or heterocyclic halides were family of Pd–NHC precatalysts is their method of preparation,
coupled with primary and secondary amines. Of particular and the low cost associated with it, which allows the reaction (see
interest are the products from the coupling of bromobenzene eq 1) to be conducted on a kilogram scale in open air from less
with the bulky 1-adamantylamine and the optically active (R)- expensive precursors and bases. The result is robust, general, and
α-methylbenzylamine, the former proceeding with ease and the highly active catalysts that are now cheaper than Pd(PPh3)4, the
latter without racemization.122 current choice for routine couplings in industry and academia,
Aryl amination can occur within more complicated reaction despite its inadequate stability and moderate activity.
sequences. The PEPPSI ™-IPr precatalyst was used in an indole What lies in the future? An important key area that remains
synthesis (a vinyl amination–Heck sequence) under microwave underdeveloped is the use of NHC ligands in Pd-mediated
conditions (eq 19).123 A similar approach to N-substituted indoles reactions outside of the cross-coupling domain such as in
(an aryl amination–alkyne hydroamination sequence) was oxidation, reduction, allyl substitution, diene hydroamination,
published by Ackerman, using a catalyst prepared in situ from and tandem cyclization reactions. What benefits NHC ligands
IPr•HCl and Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %). Weak bases (Cs2CO3, K 3PO4) will bring to these areas is an exciting question that eagerly awaits
were suitable, and the reaction was also executed as a tandem, an answer. Many of these transformations open the possibility
one-pot Sonogashira coupling–indole cyclization sequence (64% for enantioselective catalysis. However, a highly active and
yield).124 enantioselective Pd–NHC catalyst is a promise that so far has
not been fulfilled. Furthermore, the use of Pd–NHC catalysts
for cross-coupling reactions of heavily functionalized, complex
substrates, such as in key steps in complex total syntheses,125 is
PEPPSI™-IPr (2 mol %) eagerly awaited as well.
ArX + R1R2NH (1.1 equiv) Ar–NR1R2
t-BuOK, DME
50 oC, 2–24 h
6. References and Notes
Ar X R1 R2 Yield
(†) Current address: Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology
4-MeOC6HHolly:
4 Cl morpholin-4-yl 84% (IBN), 31 Biopolis Way, #04-01, The Nanos, Singapore 138 669.
Ph Cl E1_Organ_Eq18_Tbl.doc
morpholin-4-yl 81%
(1) Wanzlick, H.-W.; Schönherr, H.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1968,
Please append to this equation.
7, 141.
4-FC6H4 Cl morpholin-4-yl 86%
(2) Öfele, K. J. Organomet. Chem. 1968, 12, P42.
2,6-Me2C6H3 Cl morpholin-4-yl 81%
(3) Arduengo, A. J., III; Harlow, R. L.; Kline, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2,6-Me2C6H3 Cl H Cy 65%
1991, 113, 361.
Ph Br H Ad 70%
(4) Herrmann, W. A.; Elison, M.; Fischer, J.; Köcher, C.; Artus, G. R.
Ph Br H (R)-PhCH(Me) 70% J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2371.
thien-3-yl Cl Me Ph 73% (5) Hahn, F. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1348.
(6) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 953.
Ref. 122
(7) Bourissou, D.; Guerret, O.; Gabbai, F. P.; Bertrand, G. Chem. Rev.
eq 18 2000, 100, 39.
(8) (a) Herrmann, W. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1290. (b)
Herrmann, W. A.; Köcher, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997,
R1 Br H 2N
H 36, 2162.
PEPPSI™-IPr (2 mol %) N
+ R1 (9) (a) César, V.; Bellemin-Laponnaz, S.; Gade, L. H. Chem. Soc.
t-BuOK, PhMe
H Br R2 210 °C (µw), 5 min R2 Rev. 2004, 33, 619. (b) Perry, M. C.; Burgess, K. Tetrahedron:
R1 R2 Yield
Asymmetry 2003, 14, 951.
Ph H 74% (10) Nair, V.; Bindu, S.; Sreekumar, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5130.
Ph Me 84%
Ph Cl 80% (11) (a) Cavallo, L.; Correa, A.; Costabile, C.; Jacobsen, H. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2005, 690, 5407. (b) Scott, N. M.; Nolan, S. P. Eur. J. Inorg.
VOL. 39, NO. 4 • 2006
Et Me 82%
Chem. 2005, 1815. (c) Garrison, J. C.; Youngs, W. J. Chem. Rev. 2005,
Ref. 123
Ref. 123 105, 3978. (d) Crabtree, R. H. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 5451.
(e) Crudden, C. M.; Allen, D. P. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 2247.
eq 19
(f) Peris, E.; Crabtree, R. H. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 2239.
109
(12) Herrmann, W. A.; Öfele, K.; v. Preysing, D.; Schneider, S. K. J. (44) Viciu, M. S.; Grasa, G. A.; Nolan, S. P. Organometallics 2001, 20,
(42) (a) Grasa, G. A.; Viciu, M. S.; Huang, J.; Nolan, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 42, 5749.
2001, 66, 7729. (b) Huang, J.; Grasa, G.; Nolan, S. P. Org. Lett. (68) Knochel, P.; Sapountzis, I.; Gommermann, N. In Metal-Catalyzed
1999, 1, 1307. Cross-Coupling Reactions, 2nd ed.; de Meijere, A., Diederich, F.,
(43) Gao, C.; Tao, X.; Qian, Y.; Huang, J. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1444. Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2004; Vol. 2, pp 671–698.
110
(69) Huang, J.; Nolan, S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9889. 2nd ed.; de Meijere, A., Diederich, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Pd–N-Heterocyclic Carbene (NHC) Catalysts for Cross-Coupling Reactions
(70) Frisch, A. C.; Rataboul, F.; Zapf, A.; Beller, M. J. Organomet. 2004; Vol. 1, pp 125–161. (b) Espinet, P.; Echavarren, A. M. Angew.
Chem. 2003, 687, 403. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4704.
(71) Organ, M. G.; Abdel-Hadi, M.; Avola, S.; Hadei, N.; Nasielski, (96) (a) Denmark, S. E.; Sweis, R. F. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-
J.; O’Brien, C. J.; Valente, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc., submitted for Coupling Reactions, 2nd ed.; de Meijere, A., Diederich, F., Eds.;
publication, 2006. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2004; Vol. 1, pp 163–216. (b) Denmark, S.
(72) (a) Bellina, F.; Carpita, A.; Rossi, R. Synthesis 2004, 2419. (b) E.; Ober, M. H. Aldrichimica Acta 2003, 36, 75.
Miyaura, N. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions, 2nd (97) Grasa, G. A.; Nolan, S. P. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 119.
ed.; de Meijere, A., Diederich, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, (98) Lee, H. M.; Nolan, S. P. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2053.
2004; Vol. 1, pp 41–123. (c) Miura, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. (99) (a) Marsden, J. A.; Haley, M. M. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-
2004, 43, 2201. Coupling Reactions, 2nd ed.; de Meijere, A., Diederich, F., Eds.;
(73) Loch, J. A.; Albrecht, M.; Peris, E.; Mata, J.; Faller, J. W.; Crabtree, Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2004; Vol. 1, pp 317–394. (b) Sonogashira,
R. H. Organometallics 2002, 21, 700. K. In Handbook of organopalladium chemistry for organic
(74) (a) Dastgir, S.; Coleman, K. S.; Cowley, A. R.; Green, M. L. H. synthesis; Negishi, E., Ed.; wiley-Interscience: New York, 2002;
Organometallics 2006, 25, 300. (b) Lee, H. M.; Zeng, J. Y.; Hu, Vol. 1, pp 493–529.
C. H.; Lee, M.-T. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 6822. (c) Metallinos, (100) Caddick, S.; Cloke, F. G. N.; Clentsmith, G. K. B.; Hitchcock, P. B.;
C.; Barrett, F. B.; Chaytor, J. L.; Heska, M. E. A. Org. Lett. McKerrecher, D.; Titcomb, L. R.; Williams, M. R. V. J. Organomet.
2004, 6, 3641. (d) Kim, J.-H.; Jun, B.-H.; Byun, J.-W.; Lee, Y.-S. Chem. 2001, 617–618, 635.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5827. (e) Lee, H. M.; Lu, C. Y.; Chen, (101) Batey, R. A.; Shen, M.; Lough, A. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1411.
C. Y.; Chen, W. L.; Lin, H. C.; Chiu, P. L.; Cheng, P. Y. Tetrahedron (102) Ma, Y.; Song, C.; Jiang, W.; Wu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Andrus, M.
2004, 60, 5807. (f) Palencia, H.; Garcia-Jimenez, F.; Takacs, J. M. B. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3317.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3849. (g) Zhao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, D.; (103) Culkin, D. A.; Hartwig, J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 234.
Liu, J.; Li, L.; Zhang, T. Y.; Zhang, H. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, (104) Hamann, B. C.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12382.
1643. (105) Palucki, M.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11108.
(75) (a) Schoenfelder, D.; Nuyken, O.; Weberskirch, R. J. Organomet. (106) Satoh, T.; Kawamura, Y.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M. Angew. Chem.,
Chem. 2005, 690, 4648. (b) Kang, T.; Feng, Q.; Luo, M. Synlett Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1740.
2005, 2305. (c) Kim, J.-H.; Kim, J.-W.; Shokouhimehr, M.; Lee, (107) Navarro, O.; Marion, N.; Scott, N. M.; González, J.; Amoroso, D.;
Y.-S. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6714. (d) Steel, P. G.; Teasdale, C. Bell, A.; Nolan, S. P. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 9716.
W. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 8977. (e) Byun, J.-W.; Lee, Y.-S. (108) Singh, R.; Nolan, S. P. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 5832.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 1837. (109) Jørgensen, M.; Lee, S.; Liu, X.; Wolkowski, J. P.; Hartwig, J. F. J.
(76) (a) Wang, R.; Twamley, B.; Shreeve, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 426. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12557.
(b) Albrecht, M.; Stoeckli-Evans, H. Chem. Commun. 2005, 4705. (110) Lee, S.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3402.
(77) Arentsen, K.; Caddick, S.; Cloke, F. G. N.; Herring, A. P.; Hitchcock, (111) Glorius, F.; Altenhoff, G.; Goddard, R.; Lehmann, C. Chem.
P. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3511. Commun. 2002, 2704.
(78) Fairlamb, I. J. S.; Kapdi, A. R.; Lee, A. F. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4435. (112) Arao, T.; Kondo, K.; Aoyama, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 1417.
(79) Zhang, C.; Trudell, M. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 595. (113) Jiang, L.; Buchwald, S. L. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling
(80) Song, C.; Ma, Y.; Chai, Q.; Ma, C.; Jiang, W.; Andrus, M. B. Reactions, 2nd ed.; de Meijere, A., Diederich, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH:
Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 7438. Weinheim, 2004; Vol. 2, pp 699–760.
(81) Altenhoff, G.; Goddard, R.; Lehmann, C. W.; Glorius, F. Angew. (114) Schlummer, B.; Scholz, U. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1599.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3690. (115) Green, J. C.; Herbert, B. J.; Lonsdale, R. J. Organomet. Chem.
(82) Altenhoff, G.; Goddard, R.; Lehmann, C. W.; Glorius, F. J. Am. 2005, 690, 6054.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15195. (116) De K. Lewis, A. K.; Caddick, S.; Cloke, F. G. N.; Billingham, N. C.;
(83) Huang, W.; Guo, J.; Xiao, Y.; Zhu, M.; Zou, G.; Tang, J. Tetrahedron Hitchcock, P. B.; Leonard, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10066.
2005, 61, 9783. (117) Stauffer, S. R.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6977.
(84) Arentsen, K.; Caddick, S.; Cloke, F. G. N. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 9710. (118) Stauffer, S. R.; Lee, S.; Stambuli, J. P.; Hauck, S. I.; Hartwig, J. F.
(85) Navarro, O.; Oonishi, Y.; Kelly, R. A.; Stevens, E. D.; Briel, O.; Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1423.
Nolan, S. P. J. Organomet.Chem. 2004, 689, 3722. (119) Lerma, I. S.; Cawley, M. J.; Cloke, F. G. N.; Arentsen, K.; Scott,
(86) Navarro, O.; Marion, N.; Oonishi, Y.; Kelly, R. A., III; Nolan, S. P. J. S.; Pearson, S. E.; Hayler, J.; Caddick, S. J. Organomet. Chem.
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 685. 2005, 690, 5841.
(87) Navarro, O.; Kaur, H.; Mahjoor, P.; Nolan, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 2004, (120) Cheng, J.; Trudell, M. L. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1371.
69, 3173. (121) Viciu, M. S.; Kissling, R. M.; Stevens, E. D.; Nolan, S. P. Org. Lett.
(88) Andrus, M. B.; Song, C. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3761. 2002, 4, 2229.
(89) Dubbaka, S. R.; Vogel, P. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 95. (122) Organ, M. G.; Abdel-Hadi, M.; Avola, S.; Hadei, N.; Kantchev,
(90) Ma, Y.; Song, C.; Jiang, W.; Xue, G.; Cannon, J. F.; Wang, X.; E. A. B.; O’Brien, C. J.; Valente, C. J. Org. Chem., submitted for
Andrus, M. B. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4635. publication, 2006.
(91) Ma, Y.; Song, C.; Ma, C.; Sun, Z.; Chai, Q.; Andrus, M. B. Angew. (123) Shore, G. J.; Organ, M. G. J. Comb. Chem., submitted for
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5871. publication, 2006.
(92) Fürstner, A.; Leitner, A. Synlett 2001, 290. (124) Ackermann, L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 439.
(93) Bedford, R. B.; Betham, M.; Blake, M. E.; Frost, R. M.; Horton, P. N.; (125) To date, a single example of the use of Pd–NHC in total synthesis—
VOL. 39, NO. 4 • 2006
Hursthouse, M. B.; López-Nicolás, R.-M. Dalton Trans. 2005, 2774. an approach towards polycyclic heteroaromatic Cryptocarya
(94) Bedford, R. B.; Betham, M.; Coles, S. J.; Frost, R. M.; Hursthouse, alkaloids using a Buchwald–Hartwig amination mediated by
M. B. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 9663. IPrPd(π‑C3H5)Cl as the key step—has been published: Caemmerer,
(95) (a) Mitchel, T. N. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions, S. S.; Viciu, M. S.; Stevens, E. D.; Nolan, S. P. Synlett 2003, 1871.
111
About the Authors studies directed towards the total synthesis of pestalotiopin
PEPPSI ™-SIPr
Visit sigma-aldrich.com/peppsicat1.
This highly active Pd catalyst has been effectively utilized Me2N P Pd P NMe2
Cl
for the Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reactions of a diverse Ar X + Ar' B(OH)2
Ar Ar '
array of heteroaryl halides. Guram and co-workers have (1.2 equiv) toluene H2O (10 20% H2O)
2 equiv K2CO3, 12 h, reflux
also employed a wide range of arylboronic acids in this
methodology, leading to high product yields and TON of NH2 S N N N
10,000.1 The catalyst’s air stability, ease of preparation from N N
NH2 N N
S
NH2
commercially inexpensive starting materials, and efficiency in
producing heterobiaryl building blocks make it attractive for
rapid uptake into academic and industrial research groups. CF3
O F
Additionally, this methodology has greatly advanced the
92% 98% 95%
reactivity of five- and six-membered heteroaryl chlorides 93% 96% 95%
PCy2 PCy2
MeO OMe
NH2 NH2 NH2 NH2
7.5 mol % 2 mol % SO3Na
HO2C Cl + (HO)2B
X + R2 SO3Na
R2
HO2C
Pd(OAc)2 (1 mol %), 2 8 h
R1 R1
[PdCl2(CH3CN)2] (2.5 mol %) 1.3 to 1.5 equiv K2CO3 (3 equiv), H2O, 100 oC 93%
X = Br, Cl Cs2CO3 (2.5 - 5 equiv), 12 h,
H2O/CH3CN (1:1), 60 100 oC
F PCy2
Me
CO2H HO2C C8H17 C8H17 MeO OMe
70% Me (HO)2B HO
MeO 86% HO2C F 71% SO3Na
2 mol %
HO Cl + O S Me O S
Pd(OAc)2 (1 mol %), 10 12 h
HO2C Me K2CO3 (3 equiv), H2O, 100 oC 93%
S
N
MeO 88% 93% 96%
1.3 to 1.5 equiv
References
(1) Guram, A. S. et al. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1787. (2) Anderson, K. W.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6173. (3) Singer, R. A. et al. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006,
47, 3727. (4) Bei, X. et al. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 6797.
Ph
rival those of the known art in the amination field, and the CF3
novel ligand shown to the right is attractive due to its ease P
P
SO3Na
SO3Na
Sigma-Aldrich, in collaboration with Solvias, is proud to present the Chiral Ligands Kit—
the ultimate toolkit for asymmetric catalysis!
The Solvias Chiral Ligands Kit is designed to allow rapid screening of chiral catalysts,
and contains sets of the well-known Solvias ligand families below.
All products in the kit are 100-mg sample sizes and available in both enantiomeric forms,
giving you access to a total of 80 products.
Easy Reordering
All 80 ligands are available from Sigma-Aldrich individually in 100-mg, 500-mg, 1-g,
and 5-g package sizes for easy reordering.
For detailed information about the ligands kit and individual components,
please visit sigma-aldrich.com/solviasligands.
Lumidot™ CdSe-6 CdSe 480 25 mg in 5 mL toluene 480 481–502 24 2.1–2.3 0.49 ~50%
662550-1EA CdSe 520 25 mg in 5 mL toluene 520 525–542 25 2.4–2.6 0.68 ~50%
CdSe 560 25 mg in 5 mL toluene 560 563–572 25 3.0–3.5 1.2 ~50%
CdSe 590 25 mg in 5 mL toluene 590 595–611 24 4.0–4.3 2.5 ~50%
CdSe 610 25 mg in 5 mL toluene 610 618–627 25 4.7–5.2 3.7 ~50%
CdSe 640 25 mg in 5 mL toluene 640 639–653 24 6.2–7.7 8.6 ~50%
Accelerating Customers’ Success through Leadership in Life Science, High Technology and Service
Over one million scientists and technologists use our biochemical and organic chemical products in scientific
and genomic research, biotechnology, pharmaceutical development, disease diagnosis and manufacturing.
Sigma‑Aldrich operates in 35 countries, and has over 7,200 employees providing excellent service worldwide.
Learn more about our career opportunities by visiting
our award-winning Web site at sigma-aldrich.com/careers.
PRESORTED
STANDARD
U.S. POSTAGE
P.O. Box 14508 PAID
SIGMA-ALDRICH
St. Louis, MO 63178 CORPORATION
USA
IXD
01219-503200
0086