Effect of Noise On Analog Communication Systems: Nccu Wireless Comm. Lab

NCCU
Wireless Comm. Lab.

Chapter 5
Effect of Noise on Analog Communication
Systems
2
CCU
Wireless Access Tech. Lab.
Outline
)Chapter 5 Effect of Noise on Analog Communication Systems
A5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems
5.1.1 Effect of noise on a baseband system
5.1.2 Effect of noise on DSB-SC AM
5.1.3 Effect of noise on SSB AM
5.1.4 Effect of noise on conventional
A5.2 Carrier-Phase Estimation with a phase-Locked Loop (PLL)
5.2.1 The phase-locked loop (PLL)
5.2.2 Effect of additive noise on phase estimation
A5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation
5..3.1 Threshold effect in angle modulation
5.3.2 Pre-emphasis and De-emphasis filtering
A5.4 Comparison of analog-modulation systems
3
CCU
Outline
A5.5 Effects of transmission losses and noise in analog
communication systems
5.5.1 Characterization of thermal noise sources
5.5.2 Effective noise temperature and noise figure
5.5.3 Transmission losses
5.5.4 Repeaters for signal transmission
A5.6 Further reading
4
CCU
5 Effect of Noise on Analog Communication Systems
)The effect of noise on various analog communication systems
will be analysis in this chapter.
)Angle-modulation systems and particularly FM, can provide
a high degree of noise immunity, and therefore are desirable
in cases of severe noise and/or low signal power.
)The noise immunity is obtained at the price of sacrificing
channel bandwidth because he bandwidth requirements of
angle-modulation systems is considerably higher than
amplitude-modulation systems.
5
CCU
-W W
LPT
N
u(t) r(t)
m(t)
5.1 Effect of Noise on linear-Modulation Systems
(1) Baseband system
)(1) Baseband system
( )
0
2
n
N
S f =
0
0
0
2
w
n
w
N
P df NW
+
= =
:
R
P received power
0
0
R R
b N
S P P
Then
N P NW

= =

baseband
6
CCU
m(t)
DSB-SC
Demodulation
N
u(t)
r(t)
DSB-SC
modulation
(2) DSB-SC AM
)(2) DSB-SC AM
( ) ( ) ( )
cos 2
c c c
u t Am t f t = +
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
cos 2
cos 2 sin 2
c c c
c c s c
r t u t n t
Am t f t
n t f t n t f t

= +
= +
+
7
CCU
(2) DSB-SC AM
)Coherent demodulation
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
cos 2
cos 2 cos 2
cos 2 cos 2
sin 2 cos 2
1 1
cos cos( ) sin
2 2
1
cos 4
2
1
cos(4 ) si
2
c
c c c c
c c c
s c c
c c c s
c c c
c c s
r t f t
Amt f t f t
n t f t f t
n t f t f t
Amt n t n t
Amt f t
n t f t n t

+
= + +
+ +
+
= + +

+ + +
+ +
( )
n 4
c
f t +

8
CCU
(2) DSB-SC AM
)
)I f PLL is employed
)Assume
)Message power :
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 1
cos cos sin
2 2
c c c s
y t Am t n t n t = + +

coherent or synchronon demod
c
=
( ) ( ) ( )
1 1
0
2 2
c c c
y t Am t n t = = = +
( )
( )
2
2
0
2
2
4
0
4

4
c
c
M
c
M
A
P E M t
A
R
A
P
=

=
=
9
CCU
(2) DSB-SC AM
)Noise power :
Note that :
0
1
4
c
n n
P P =
-f
c
f
c
BPF
n
w
(t) n(t)
c s
n n n
P P P = =
( ) ( ) ( )
2
0
, -
2
0,
n W
c
S f S f H f
N
f f W
otherwise
=
<
( )
0
0
4 2
2
n n
N
P S f df W WN
= = =
10
CCU
(2) DSB-SC AM
)
( )
0
2
2
0
0 0
0
2 2
2
0, 0
4
1
2
2
4
2 2
c
M
c M
n
c c M
R
R
DSB b
A
P
S P A P
N P WN
WN
A A P
P E M t
S P S
N N W N

= = =

= =

= =

11
CCU
(3) SSB-AM
)(3) SSB-AM
with ideal-phase coherent demodulator
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
cos 2 sin 2
ct c c c
u t A m t f t Am t f t =
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
cos 2 sin 2
ct c c c s c
r t u t n t
A mt n t f t Amt n t f t
= +
= + +

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 1
cos 2
2 2
c c c
y t LPF r t f t Am t n t = = +

12
CCU
(3) SSB-AM
( )
0
2
0
0
0
-
1
4
1 1

4 4
2
2
c
c M
n n n
n n
P A P
P P P
N
P S f df W WN
=
= =
= = =
0
2
0
0, 0
c M
SSB n
S P A P
N P WN

= =

2 2
2
0,

2 2
c c
R M c M
M
SSB b
A A
but P P P A P
S S
N N
= + =

=

13
CCU
(4) Conventional AM
)(4) Conventional AM
for synchronous demodulation (similar to DSB, except using
instead of m(t) )
by a dc block
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 cos 2
1 cos 2 sin 2
c n c
c n c c s c
u t A am t f t
r t A am t n t f t n t f t

= +

= + +

( )
1
n
am t +

( ) ( ) ( )
1 1
1
2 2
c n c
y t A am t n t = + +

( ) ( ) ( )
1 1
2 2
c n c
y t A am t n t = +
14
CCU
(4) Conventional AM
but
0
2
2
0
0 0
2
2
2
2
0 0
0
1 1 1 1
, 4
4 4 4 2 2
1
4
1
2
2
n c
n
n
c M n n
c M
c M
N
P A a P P p W NW
A a P
A a P
S
N NW
NW
= = = =

= =

2
2
1
2
n
c
R M
A
P a P = +

2
2
2
2
0, 0
2 2
2 2
0
1
1 2

1 1

n
n
n
n n
n n
c M
M
AM M
M M
R
b M M
b b
A a P
a P
S
N a P N W
a P a P
P S
a P N W a P N
S S
N N
+

=

+

= =

+ +

= <

15
CCU
(4) Conventional AM
I n practical application :
0.8 0.9
0.1
N
M
a
P

0, 1
0, 0, 1,
0.075 ,
. . 11 ( 11 )
AM b
dB AM dB
S S
N N
S S
i e dB a lost of dB
N N

16
CCU
(4) Conventional AM
Envelope detector
( ) ( ) ( )
{ }
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2
2
1 cos 2 sin 2
1
c n c c s c
r c n c s
r t A am t n t f t n t f t
V t A am t n t n t
= + +

= + + +

17
CCU
(4) Conventional AM
ACase 1
After removing the dc component,
The same as y(t) for the synchronous demodulation, without the
coefficient
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
1 ( ) 1,
1 ( ) 1, . . 1 ( )
1 ( )
c n
s c n c n
r c n c
P n t A am t
P n t A am t i e A am t n t
V t A am t n t
+
+ +
+ +
<
< >
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
c n c
y t A am t n t = +
0, 2 0, 1
under high SNR
AM AM
S S
N N

=

( ) ( )
1 ( )
c n
A am t n t + >
18
CCU
(4) Conventional AM
ACase 2 ( ) ( )
1 ( )
c n
A am t n t + <
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
2
2
2
2 2 2
2 2
2 2
2
1
1 2 1
2
1 1
1 1
1
1
r c n c s
c n c s c c n
c c
c s n
c s
c c
n n
n
c c
n n
n
n c
V t A am t n t n t
A am t n t n t An t am t
An t
n t n t am t
n t n t
An t
V t am t
V t
An t
V t am t
V t
V t A am
= + + +
= + + + + +

+ + +

+

+ +

+ +
= + +
( ) ( ) ( )
cos
n n
t t
19
CCU
(4) Conventional AM
Notes: i) Signal and noise components are no longer additive.
ii) Signal component is multiple by the noise and is no
longer distinguishable.
iii) no meaningful SNR can be defined.
I t is said that this system is operating below the threshold
==> threshold effect
20
CCU
)
21
CCU
22
CCU
23
CCU
5.2 Carrier-Phase Estimation with a phase-Locked Loop (PLL)
)Consider DSB-SC AM
assume , zero-mean (i.e. no dc component)
the average power at the output of a narrow band filter
tuned to the carrier frequency f
c
is zero.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
cos 2
c c c
r t u t n t Am t f t n t = + = + +
( )
0 E m t =

24
CCU
Let
There is signal power at the frequency , which can
be used to drive a PLL.
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
2
2 2 2
2 2
2 2
cos 2
1 1
cos 4 2
2 2
c c c
c c c c
r t A m t f t noiseterms
A m t A m t f t noiseterms

= + +
= + + +
( ) ( )
2
0 0
m
E m t R = >

2
c
f
25
CCU
)
)The mean value of the output of Bandpass filter is a sinusoid
with frequency , phase , and amplitude
.
2
c
f
2
c
( )
( )
2
2
2
2
c
c
H f
A E m t

26
CCU
5.2.1 The phase-locked loop (PLL) )
)
)I f input to the PLL is and output of the
VCO is , represents the estimate of ,
then
( )
cos 4 2
c
f t
( )
sin 4 2
c
f t

( ) ( )
( )
( )
cos 4 2 sin 4 2
1
sin2
2
c c
e t f t f t

=
= +
( )
1
sin2 2 2
2
c
f t
27
CCU
)Loop filter is a lowpass filter, dc is reserved as is removed.
)I t has transfer function
) n(t) provide the control voltage for VCD (see section 5.3.3).
)The VCO is basically a sinusoidal signal generation with an
instantaneous phase given by
where is a gain constant in radians/ volt-sec.
4
c
f
( ) ( )
2
1 2
1
1

1
s
G s
s
+
=
+
>
( )
4 2 4
t
c c v
f t f t k v d
=

v
k
28
CCU
)The carrier-phase estimate at the output of VCO is :
and its transfer function is .
)Double-frequency terms resulting from the multiplication of
the input signal to the loop with the output of the VCD is
removed by the loop filter
PLL can be represented by the closed-loop system model
as follows.
( )
2
t
v
k v d
=

v
k
s
29
CCU
)
30
CCU
)I n steady-state operation, when the loop is tracking the phase
of the received carrier, is small.
)With this approximation, PLL is represented the linear model
shown below.

( )
1
sin2
2

31
CCU
closed-loop transfer function
where the factor of has been absorbed into the gain
parameter k
( )
( )
( )
/
1 /
kG s s
H s
kG s s
=
+
( )
2
1
1
1
s
G s
s
+
=
+
( )
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
s
H s
s s
k k
+
=

+ + +

32
CCU
)The closed-loop system function of the linearized PLL is
second order when the loop filter has a signal pole and signal
zero.
)The parameter determines the position of zero in H(s),
while K, and control the position of the closed-loop
system poles.
2
33
CCU
)The denominator of H(s) may be expressed in the standard
form
where : loop-damping factor
: natural frequency of the loop
( )
2
2
2
n n
D s s ws w = + +
n
w
2
1
1
, 2
n n
k
w w
k

= = +

( )
( )
2 2
2
2
2 /
2
n n n
n n
w w k s w
H s
s ws w
+
=
+ +
34
CCU
)The magnitude response as a function of the
normalized frequency is illustrated, with the damping
factor as a parameter and .
( )
20logH jw
n
w w
1
1 >
35
CCU
)
)The one-side noise equivalent bandwidth
)Trade-off between speed of response and noise in the phase
estimate
1 a critical damped loop response
1 a under-damped loop response
1 a over-damped loop response
=
<
>
( )
( )
( )
2 2
2
2 2 1
2
1
2
1/ /
1
4 8 /
n
neq
n K
K
w
B
w

+
+
= =
+
36
CCU
) PLL is tracking a signal as
which is corrupted by additive narrowband noise
, are assumed to be statistically independent
stationary Gaussian noise.
( ) ( )
( )
cos 2
c c
s t A f t t = +
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
cos 2 sin 2
c c s c
n t n t f t n t f t =
( )
c
n t
( )
s
n t
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( )
cos 2 sin 2
cos sin
- sin + cos

c c s c
c c s
s c s
j t
c s c s
n t x t f t t x t f t t
where x t n t t n t t
x t n t t n t t
x t jx t n t jn t e

= + +
= +
=
+ = +

37
CCU
)Problem 4.29 a phase shift does not change the first two
moments of n
c
(t) and n
s
(t).
i.e. x
c
(t) and x
s
(t) have exactly the same statistical
characteristics as n
c
(t) and n
s
(t).
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) { }
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
( ) {
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( )}
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2sin 2
sin sin 4
cos cos 4
sin cos
c
c c c c c
s s c
c c s
e t LPF s t n t f t t
LPF A x t A x t f t t t
x t x t f t t t
A x t x t

= + +

= + + + + +
+ + +
= +
.
.
. .
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
,
si n si n cos
c s
c c c
e t x t x t
A A A

=
= +
.
. . .
38
CCU
)The equivalent model is shown as below
39
CCU
)When the power of the incoming signal is much
larger than the noise power, .
)Then we may linearize the PLL shown as bellow.
2
2
c
c
A
P =

40
CCU
is additive at the input to the loop, the variance of the
phase error , which is also the variance of the VCO
output phase is
B
neq
: one-sided noise equivalent bandwidth of the loop, given by
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
1
sin cos
c s
c c
x t x t
n t
A A
= . .
( )
1
n t
.
2
0
2
neq
c
N B
A
=
( )
( )
( )
2 2
2
2 2 1
2
1
2
1/ /
1
4 8 /
n
neq
n K
K
w
B
w

+
+
= =
+
41
CCU
)Note that is the power of the input sinusoid, and is
simply proportional to the total noise power with the
bandwidth of the PLL divided by the input signal power,
hence
where is defined as the SNR
Thus, the variance of is inversely proportional to the SNR.
2
2
c
A
2
1
L
=
L
2
0
2
2
c
A
L
N
neq
B
=
42
CCU
)Note : the variance of linear
model is close to the exact
variance for
3
L
>
43
CCU
44
CCU
)By computing the autocorrelation and power spectral density
of these two noise component, one can show that both
components have spectral power in frequency band centered
at 2 f
c
.
)Lets select B
neq
<< B
bp
, then total noise spectrum at the input
to PLL may be approximated by a constant with the loop
bandwidth.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2
2 2 2

2
noise terms
y t r t u t n t u t u t n t n t = = + = + +
_
45
CCU
)This approximation allows us to obtain a simple expression
for the variance of the phase error as
where S
L
is called the squaring loss and is given as
since S
L
<1 , we have an increase in the variance of the phase
error caused by the added noise power that results from the
squaring operation.
)E.g. if the loss is 3dB or equivalently, the
variance in the estimate increase by a factor of 2.
2
1
L L
S
=
2
1
1
bp neq
L
L
B B
S
=
+
1
2 2
,
bp
neq
B
L L B
S = =
46
CCU
)Costas loop
47
CCU
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
cos 2
cos 2 cos 2
sin 2 cos 2
1
cos cos
2 2
1
sin double frequency terms

2
c c
c c c c c
s c c
c
c
s
r t Am t f t n t
y t Am t f t n t f t
n t f t f t
A
m t n
n t

= +
= +
= +
+
.
48
CCU
)
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
cos 2 cos 2
sin 2 sin 2
1
sin sin
2 2
1
cos double frequency terms

2
s c c c c
s c c
c
c
s
y t Am t f t n t f t
n t f t f t
A
m t n
n t

= + +
= +
+ +
.
49
CCU
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2
2
sin 2
4
cos sin sin

4
sin cos cos

4
1
cos sin sin cos

4
c s
c
c
c s
c
c s
c s c s
e t y y
A m t
Am t
n t n t
Am t
n t n t
n t n t n t n t

=

=
=

+

+ +

+ +

.
.
.
.
50
CCU
)These terms (signal noise and noise noise) are similar to
the two noise terms at the input of the PLL for the squaring
method.
)I n fact, if the loop filter in the Costas loop is identical to that
used in the squaring loop, the two loops are equivalent.
)Under this condition the pdf of the phase error, and the
performance of the two loops are identical.
)I n conclusion, the squaring PLL and the Costas PLL are two
practical methods for deriving a carrier-phase estimation for
synchronous demodulation of a DSB-SC AM signal.

51
CCU
5.3 Effect of noise on angle modulation
)RX for a general angle-modulated signal
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
cos 2
cos 2 2 , FM

cos 2 , PM
c c
t
c c f
c c p
u t A f t t
A f t k m d
A f t k m t

= +
52
CCU
) Assume: signal power is much higher than noise power
i.e.
)
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( )
:bandpass Gaussian noise
cos 2 sin 2
c c s c
n t
r t u t n t f t n t f t = +
_
( )
1
n c
P V t A

<
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
2 2
1
cos 2 tan
cos 2
s
c s c
c
n c n
phase Envelope
n t
n t n t n t f t
n t
V t f t t

= + +

= +

53
CCU
54
CCU
Note that
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
1
cos
sin
cos 2 tan
cos
cos
cos 2 sin
c n n
n n
c
c n n
c n n
n
c n
c
r t A V t t
V t t t
f t t
A V t t t
A V t t
V t
f t t t t
A

= +

+ +

+

+

+ +

( )
( )
( )
PM
2 FM
p
t
f
k m t
t
k m d

55
CCU
)The output of the demodulator is
where
(noise component)
( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
1
2
1
2
,
,
sin , PM

sin , FM
n
c
n
c
p n
d
f n dt
V t
p n A
V t
d
f n dt A
k m t Y t PM
y t
k m t Y t FM
k m t t t
k m t t t
=

+
=

+
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
1
sin
n
c
V t
n n A
c
Y t t t
A
=
56
CCU
)Noise component
)The autocorrelation function
( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1
1
sin
sin cos cos sin
cos sin
n
c
c
c
V t
n n A
n n n n A
s c A
Y t t t
V t t t V t t t
n t t n t t

=

=

=

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
2
2
1
( cos cos
sin sin
1
cos

s
c
c
n n n
c
n
n
c
E Y t Y t E R t t
A
R t t
R E t t
A

+ = +

+ +

= +

57
CCU
) Assume m(t) is a sample function of a zero-mean stationary
Gaussian process M(t) with autocorrelation
then
) is a zero-mean, stationary Gaussian process
( )
M
R
( )
( )
( )
PM
2 FM
p
t
f
k M t
t
k M d

( )
t
58
CCU
)At any fixed time t, the random variable
is the difference between two jointly Gaussian random
variables.
) is a Gaussian R.V. with zero mean and variance
( ) ( ) ( )
, Z t t t = +
( )
, Z t
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
2
2 2
2
2 0
Z
E t E t R
R R

= + +

=

59
CCU
) Autocorrelation function
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
2
1
2
2
c
2
c
,
2
c
2
c
0
2
c
1
= cos
A
1
= Re
A
1
= Re
A
1
= Re
A
1
= Re
A
n
c
c
c
z
c
c
Y n n
n
j t
n
j Z t
n
n
R R
n
R E Y t Y t
R E t
R E e
R E e
R e
R e

= +

+

( )
( ) ( ) ( )
0
2
c
1
=
A
c
R R
n
R e

60
CCU
)Power spectral density
where and G(f) is its Fourier transform.
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
0
2
- 0
2
- 0
2
1

c
c
c
Y Y
R R
n
c
R
n
c
R
n
c
S f F R
F R e
A
e
F R g
A
e
S f G f
A

=

=

=

=
( )
( ) R
g e

=
61
CCU
)The bandwidth of is half the bandwidth B
c
of the angle-
modulated signal, which for high modulation indices is much
larger than W, the message bandwidth.
)Since the bandwidth of the angle-modulated signal is defined
as the frequencies that contain 98%-99% of the signal power,
G(f) is very small in the neighborhood of and
( )
g
2
c
B
f =
( )
0 2
,
0,
c
c
B
n
N f
S f
otherwise
<
=

62
CCU
)A typical example of G(f), and the result of their
convolution is shown below.
( )
c
n
S f
63
CCU
)Because G(f) is very small in the neighborhood of ,
the resulting S
Y
(f) has almost a flat spectrum for , the
bandwidth of the message.
i.e. for | f |<W, the spectrum of the noise components in the PM
and FM.
2
c
B
f =
f W <
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
2
2
0 0
0 2 2
0 0
0 0 0 2 2
0
0
0
0 2 2

B
c
B
c
c
R R
Y n
c c
R R
c c
R
R
c c
e e
S f S f G f N G f df
A A
e e
N G f df N g
A A
e N
N e
A A
= =
=
= =
( )
0
2
0
0
2
2
, PM
, FM
c
c
N
A
n
N
A
S f
f
64
CCU
)The power spectrum of the noise component at the output of
the demodulator in the frequency interval | f | < Wfor PM
and FM is shown below.
65
CCU
)PM has a flat noise spectrum and FM has a parabolic noise
spectrum.
)The effect of noise in FM for higher-frequency components is
much higher than the effect of noise on low-frequency
components.
)The noise power at the output of the lowpass filter is the noise
power in the frequency range [ -W, +W].
( )
0 0
0
0
2
2
3
2
0
0
2
2
2
, PM
, PM

2
, FM
, FM
3
W
n n
W
W
W
c
c
W
W
c
c
P S f df
WN
N
df
A
A
N
W N
f df
A
A
+

= =

66
CCU
)Output signal power
)The SNR
0
2
,
2
,
PM
FM
p M
s
f M
k P
P
k P
0
0
2 2
0
2 2
0
2
0
, PM
2
3
, FM
2
p c
M
s
n
f c
M
k A
P
NW P
S
N P
k A
P
W NW

= =

67
CCU
)Note that is the received signal power, denote by P
R.
)
)The output SNR
2
2
c
A
( )
( )
max , PM
max
. FM
p p
f
f
k m t
k m t
W
( )
( )
( )
( )
2
max
0
2
0
max
0
, PW
3 , FM
p
f
M
R
mt
M
R
mt
P
P
NW
S
P N
P
NW
68
CCU
) Let
)The output SNR of a baseband system with the same received
power
0
R
b
S P
N NW

=

( )
( )
( )
( )
2
max
2
0
max
, PW
3 , FM
p
f
M
mt
b
M
mt
b
S
P
N
S
N
S
P
N
69
CCU
)Note that in the above expression is the average-to-
peak power ratio of the message signal (or, equivalently, the
power content of normalized message, ).
)Therefore,
( )
( )
2
max
M
P
mt
M
P
2
2
0
, PW
3 , FM
n
n
p M
b
f M
b
S
P
N
S
N
S
P
N
70
CCU
) Carsons rule
) The ration of the channel bandwidth to the message
bandwidth
) We can express the output SNR in terms of the bandwidth
expansion factor
( )
2 1
c
B W = +
( )
2 1
c
B
W
= = +
( )
( )
( )
( )
2
2
2
1
max
2
1
0
max
, PW
3 , FM
M
m t
b
M
m t
b
S
P
N
S
N
S
P
N
71
CCU
)I n both PM and FM, the output SNR is proportional to the
square of the modulation index .
ATherefore, increasing increases the output SNR even with
low received power.
AThis is in contrast to amplitude modulation where such an
increase in the received SNR is not possible.
)The increase in the received SNR is obtained by increasing
the bandwidth.
A Therefore, angle modulation provides a way to trade-off
bandwidth for transmitted power.
)The relation between the output SNR and the bandwidth
expansion factor, , is a quadratic relation.
AThis is far from optimal
72
CCU
) I n fact, if we increase such that the approximation
( ) does not hold, a phenomenon known as the
threshold effect will occur, and the signal will be lost in the
noise.
)I n both PM and FM the output SNR is proportional to the
square of the modulation index . Therefore, increasing
increases the output SNR even with low received power.
( ) ( )
1
n c
p V t A <

73
CCU
)A comparison of the above result with the SNR in amplitude
modulation shows that, in both case, increasing the
transmitter power will increase the output SNR, but the
mechanisms are totally different.
)I n AM, any increase in the received power directly increases
the signal power at the output of the receiver.
)I n angle modulation the message is in the phase of the
modulated signal and, consequently, increasing the
transmitter power does not increase the demodulated message
power. I n angle modulation what increases the output SNR is
a decrease in the received noise power.
74
CCU
5.3.1 Threshold Effect in Angle Modulation
)The noise analysis of angle demodulation schemes is based on
the assumption that the SNR at the demodulator input is high.
)This assumption of high SNR is a simplifying assumption that
is usually made in analysis of nonlinear-modulation systems.
)Threshold effect
AThere exists a specific signal to noise ratio at the input of the
demodulator known as the threshold SNR, beyond which signal
mutilation occurs.
AThe existence of the threshold effect places an upper limit on the trade-
off between bandwidth and power in an FM system.
AThis limit is a practical limit in the value of the demodulation
index .
AThreshold in an FM system
f
( ) ( )
,
20 1
S
N
bth
= +
75
CCU
)I n general, there are two factors that limit the value of the
demodulation index .
AThe limitation on channel bandwidth which effects through
Carsons rule.
AThe limitation on the received power that limits the value of
to less than what is derived from Equation .
( ) ( )
,
20 1
S
N
bth
= +

76
CCU
( )
( )
2
1
2
max
M
P
m t
=
( ) ( )
2
3
2
0
S S
N N
b
=
( ) ( )
,
20 1
S
N
bth
= +
( ) ( )
2
0
60 1
S
M N
P = +
77
CCU
)
78
CCU
79
CCU
5.3.1 Threshold Extension in Frequency modulation
)I n order to reduce the threshold, in other words, in order to
delay the threshold effect to appear at lower-received signal
power, it is sufficient to decrease the input-noise power at the
receiver.
A This can be done by increasing the effective system bandwidth
at the receiver.
)Two approaches to FM threshold extension are to employ
FMFB or PLL-FM at the receiver.
)I n application where power is very limited and bandwidth is
abundant, these systems can be employed to make it possible
to use the available bandwidth more efficiently.
)Using FMFB, the threshold can be extended approximately
by 5 - 7 dB.
80
CCU
5.3.2 Pre-emphasis and De-emphasis Filtering
)The objective in pre-emphasis and de-emphasis filtering is to
design a system which behaved like an ordinary frequency
modulator demodulator pair in the low frequency band of
the message signal and like a phase modulator demodulator
pair in the high-frequency band of the message signal.
)At the demodulator , we need a filter that at low frequencies
has a constant gain and at high frequencies behaves as an
integrator.
)The demodulator filter which emphasizes high frequencies is
called the pre-emphasis filter and the demodulator filter
which is the inverse of the modulator filter is called the de-
emphasis filter.
81
CCU
82
CCU
)The characteristics of the pre-emphasis and de-emphasis
filters depend largely on the power-spectral density of the
message process.
)I n commercial FM broadcasting of music and voice, the
frequency response of the receiver (de-emphasis) filter is
where
is the 3-dB frequency of the filter
( )
0
1
1
d
f
f
H f
j
=
+
6
1
0
2 75 10
2100 f Hz

=
83
CCU
)The noise component after the de-emphasis filter has a power
spectral density
)The noise power at the output of the demodulator
( ) ( ) ( )
0
2
2
0
2
2
0
2
1

1
nPD n d
f
c
f
S f S f H f
N
f
A
=
=
+
( )
2
2
0
2
0
2
3
1
0
2
0 0
1
2
tan
W
nP D nP D
W
W
f
W
c
f
c
c
P S f df
N f
df
A
N f W W
f f A
+
=
=
+

=

84
CCU
)The ratio of the output SNRs
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
0
3
0
2
3
0 0
2
0 0
0
0 0
0
0
2
3
2 1
3
1

tan
1

3
tan
c
c
S
n N
PD
S
nPD N
N W
A
N f
W W
f f
A
W
f
W W
f f
P
P
=
=

85
CCU
)
86
CCU
87
CCU
5.3.4 Comparison of Analog0Modulation System
)Linear modulation system
ADSB-SC
AConventional AM
ASSB-SC
AVSB
)Nonlinear modulation system
AFM
APM
88
CCU
)The bandwidth efficiency of the system
ASSB-SC > SSB > VSB > DSB-SC > DSB
APM = FM
AThe most bandwidth-efficient analog communication system is
the SSB-SC system with a transmission bandwidth equal to the
signal bandwidth.
APM and particularly FM are least-favorable systems when
bandwidth is the major concern, and their use is only justified
by their high level of noise immunity.
89
CCU
)The power efficiency of the system
AAngle-modulation scheme and particularly FM provide a high
level of noise immunity and, therefore, power efficiency.
AConventional AM and VSB+C are least power-efficient system.
90
CCU
)The case of implementation of system
AThe simplest receiver structure is the receiver for conventional
AM, and the structure of receiver for VSB+C system is only
slightly more complicated.
A FM receivers are also easy to implement.
ADSB-SC and SSB-SC require synchronous demodulation and
their receiver structure is much more complicated.
91
CCU
5.5 Effects of transmission losses and noise in analog
communication systems
( ) ( ) ( )
, 1. r t s t n t = + <
92
CCU
93
CCU
)Based on quantum mechanics, the power-spectral density of
thermal noise is
where his Plancks constant, kis Boltzmanns constant, and T
is the temperature of the resistor in degree Kelvin, i.e.,
T=273+C, where C is in degrees Centigrade.
) by
( )
( )
2
2
V /
1
h f
kT
R
Rh f
S f Hz
e
=
1
h f
kT
h f
kT
e = +
( )
2
2 /
R
S f RkT V Hz =
94
CCU
)The power spectral density of noise voltage across the load
resistor is
( )
0
0
21
0
/
2
/
2
290
4 10 /
n
kT
S f W Hz
N
W Hz
where T K
N W Hz
=
=
=
=
95
CCU
5.5.2 Effective noise temperature and noise
figure
)Thermal noise converted to amplifier and load
96
CCU
figure
)The noise power at the output of the network is
)Noise-equivalent bandwidth of the filter is defined as
)The output noise power from an idea amplifier that
introduces no additional noise
( ) ( ) ( )
0
2 2
0
2
n n
N
P S f H f df H f df

= =

( )
( )
2
2
max
1
2g
g
eq
B H f df
where H f
=
=
0
0
g
n neq
P N B =
97
CCU
figure
)The noise figure of the amplifier is
0
1

g
and is the power of the amplifier output
due to internally generated noise.
i
i
e
n
e
neq
n
T
F
T
p
where T
kB
P

= +

=
98
CCU
)Transmission Loss
L = P
T
/ P
R
L
db
=10log L = 10log P
T
10log P
R
99
CCU
)
100
CCU
)
101
CCU
)
102
CCU
103
CCU
) P
R
= P
T
/ L
) P
0
=g P
R
= g P
T
/ L
)By g = L and P
0
= P
T
)The SNR at the output of the repeater is
1
0
0
1
1

1

i a
R
a neq
T
a neq
S S
N F N
P
F N B
P
F N B

=

=

=

L
104
CCU

Effect of Noise On Analog Communication Systems: Nccu Wireless Comm. Lab

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Effect of Noise On Analog Communication Systems: Nccu Wireless Comm. Lab

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

NCCU

Wireless Comm. Lab.

sin double frequency terms

cos double frequency terms

cos sin sin

sin cos cos

cos sin sin cos

Вам также может понравиться