Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3


FLUENT - Unsteady Flow Past a Cylinder - Step 7 - Simulation - Confluence

Search Cornell

Home Edit Browse/Manage Login
Search Simulation > > FLUENT - Unsteady Flow Past a C ylinder - Step 7

FLUENT - Unsteady Flow Past a Cylinder - Step 7

Added by Yong Sheng Khoo , last edited by Yong Sheng Khoo on Apr 27, 2009 16:53

Labels: None

Problem Specification 1. Create Geometry in GAMBIT 2. Mesh Geometry in GAMBIT 3. Specify Boundary Types in GAMBIT 4. Set Up Problem in FLUENT 5. Solve! 6. Analyze Results 7. Validate the Results

Step 7: Validate the Results

For steady case, to validate the accuracy of the result, we have to check whether the mesh is refine enough. For unsteady case, we have another parameter that we have to take note of, which is the time step size. The smaller the time step size, the more accurate the representation of the physical flow. Time Step Size Investigation We will reiterate the solution using time step size of 0.2s follow by 0.1s. Increase the number of time steps accordingly to capture 10 shedding cycles. If you don't capture enough shedding cycles after initial iteration, just continue the iteration. The reason we need at least 10 sustained shedding cycle is that we would want to calculate the shedding frequency.
https://confluence.cornell.edu/display/SIMULATION/FLUENT+-+Unsteady+Flow+Past+a+Cylinder+-+Step+7 1/3


FLUENT - Unsteady Flow Past a Cylinder - Step 7 - Simulation - Confluence

No reinitialization is needed because since previous solution should give us a good approximation of current solution with smaller time step. Another advantage of not reinitialize the problem is that, we can keep all our CL data in a single file name: "cl-history".

Using method taught in Step 6, calculate the Strouhal Number for time steps size of 0.2 and 0.1. Following table summarizes the result. Time Step Size (s) 0.1 Strouhal Number Difference (%) 0.2 0.4

0.188 0.182 0.172 3 6 0

As can be seen, the Strouhal number difference get smaller as we move to a smaller time steps. We can conclude that time steps size of 0.1s will give us a fairly accurate representation of physical flow in term of time parameter. Do note that with time step size of 0.1s, we have exceeded the experimental Strouhal value of 0.183. However, we have only investigated the time parameter. We will have to investigate other parameters such as grid convergence, residual, unsteady formulation, etc, before we can conclude on the accuracy of our model.

Grid Convergence Investigation To determine the effect of grid convergence, a finer mesh with double the original mesh density was created. Using the time steps size of 0.1s and a refine mesh, we solved the problem in FLUENT again. With the finer mesh, we obtained Strouhal value of 0.186. As can be seen, the value is much closer to the experimental value. Further refining mesh will get us to more accurate solution.

Conclusion For steady case, we need to check grid convergence to validate the accuracy of our result. For
https://confluence.cornell.edu/display/SIMULATION/FLUENT+-+Unsteady+Flow+Past+a+Cylinder+-+Step+7 2/3


FLUENT - Unsteady Flow Past a Cylinder - Step 7 - Simulation - Confluence

unsteady case, we have to validate both time parameters (time step size) and grid convergence.

Reference C.H.K Williamson and G.L. Brown, A Series in to representat the Strouhal-Reynolds num ber relationship of the cylinder wake, J. Fluids Struc. 12,1073 (1998). Back to Problem Specification See and rate the complete Learning Module Go to all FLUENT Learning Modules

This work is licensed under a C reative C ommons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

Adaptavist Theme Builder (4.2.4-M1) Powered by Atlassian Confluence 3.5.16, the Enterprise Wiki