Information No.

09458205, 09479105, and 09497005 New Brunswick Provincial Court (Provincial Court Office of Fredericton) BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and ANDRE CHARLES MURRAY FORM 2 AFFIDAVIT OF Andre Murray New Brunswick Rules of Provincial Court Practice I, Andr Murray, of the City of Fredericton, County of York, in the Province of New Brunswick, Artist, MAKE OATH AND SAY AS FOLLOWS: (1) I Andr Murray, have personal knowledge of the matters herein deposed to except where otherwise stated. (2) On the April 10, 2012, at or about 6:30 PM, accompanied by a witness Shane Henry, I Andr Murray, Pursuant to New Brunswick Rules of Court, Rule 18.02(1)(a), caused Trina Rodgers to be Process Served - Court Documents; Trina Rodgers is found named upon subject documents as INTENDED RESPONDENT (Defendant); subject Process Service occurred at Trina Rodgers place of residence civic address: 15 Fisher Ave, Fredericton, NB, E3A 4J1 by leaving with Defendant Trina Rodgers an Envelope containing the following two herein below described documents NOTICE OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (FORM 62A) Dated April 5, 2012; Affidavit of Andre Murray; Dated April 5, 2012;

(3) April 10, 2012, at or about 6:30 PM, despite the fact, that I had taken precautions: (one minute before being assaulted by Neil Rodgers, as I approached Trina & Neil Rodgers) I had calmly, although clearly articulated my intentions to Process Serve Court documents upon Trina Rodgers, at which time Trina Rodgers immediately ran into her house, further, however despite my being approximately one hundred feet from the entrance to Trina Rodgers residence civic address: 15 Fisher Ave, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3A 4J1, Neil Rogers, husband of Trina Rodgers, did accost me, whereby Neil Rogers did place his hands upon my physical body, consequentially assaulting me by pulling and then pushing me causing me to lose balance as Neil Rodgers manoeuvred himself to push me down and onto the ground. (4) Furthermore, I Andre Murray having been thrown off balance on to the ground by Neil Rodgers, thereafter, and upon returning to my feet, (as is clearly visible in the audio video 1

recording provided by Shane Henry to be used as evidence in this matter) I was once again attacked by Neil Rodgers, who continued to injure me, at this time (as I walked past Neil Rodgers) on my way to Trina Rodgers residence civic address: 15 Fisher Ave, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3A 4J1, Neil Rogers attacked me from behind, wrapped his left arm around my neck, (what is commonly known as a head lock) thereby suspending his weight by my neck, thereby, forcibly moving my head to a lowered position, at which time, while I was still standing, although, being held down by the subject head lock in a bent over position, I was struck directly in my front forehead and or head and face area by the closed hand and or fist of Neil Rodgers, moreover, please note that I was struck by Neil Rodgers with sufficient force that I almost lost consciousness. (5) Furthermore, as I attempted to maintain my balance and recover from the sudden impact of being struck in the head by the closed fist of Neil Rodgers I made my way to being directly in front of the entrance door of Trina Rodgers residence civic address: 15 Fisher Ave, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3A 4J1, at which time, as Trina Rodgers stood observing from inside the entrance doorway, as I was about to Process Serve and or pass the subject Court Documents to Trina Rodgers, Neil Rodgers once again attacked me,; this definite and separate occurrence of assault upon me by Neil Rodgers involved Neil Rodgers approaching me from behind, Neil Rodgers positioned himself to be choking me from behind whereby Neil Rodgers pulled me backwards almost consequentially, damaging my back and neck, as Neil Rodgers continued pulling me backwards and across a horizontal railing at the entrance of Trina Rodgers residence civic address: 15 Fisher Ave, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3A 4J1; this assault was especially harmful as Neil Rodgers was suspending his entire weight from my neck while twisting and pulling me backwards. (6) I deny the false claims of Neil Rodgers that I assaulted him and say it with great emphasis that Neil Rodgers is (as the case may be) wilfully swearing a false oath and or is falsifying an affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning these subject matters of assault; moreover Neil Rodgers and his wife Trina Rodgers together with their adult son Thomas Neil Rodgers have deliberately, and wilfully given false, misleading, information and or incomplete testimony, therefore, fraudulently claimed that I assaulted Neil Rodgers, all of which has provided Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE with an incentive to move to action and or impel. Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE to lay charges of assault against me. (7) The April 10, 2012 exchange, between myself and Neil Rodgers was recorded with a audio/video camera, by the witness which accompanied me to 15 Fisher Ave, Fredericton. That witnesses name is Shane Henry. The subject audio/video camera recorded by Shane Henry on April 10, 2012, which accurately displays the exchange, between myself and Neil Rodgers, is attached hereto as exhibit A of this affidavit. (8) At the time of the incident and as evidenced in this video Trina Rodgers, the intended recipient of service of the Court documents, can be plainly seen, evading service by running from the top of the driveway, at 15 Fisher Ave, Fredericton, into the house, from left to right across the screen, as Neil Rodgers quickly approaches Andre Murray and immediately begins assaulting Andre Murray without provocation. 2

At this juncture of my Affidavit I will provide a history along with information, which is intended to assist the Honorable Court in its deliberation of thoughtfully weighing the options and arguments to evaluate the possibility of prejudice and or bias of Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, thereby motivating complicity with the complainants in this subject matter: Neil Rodgers, Trina Rodgers and Thomas Neil Rodgers or as may seem appropriate in light of the herewithin below provided evidence. (9) I Andr Murray, since year 2005 until June 1, 2012, was a Residential Leasehold Tenant of civic address 29 Marshall Street, and 31 Marshall Street, in THE CITY OF FREDERICTON, New Brunswick; a residential duplex having separate entrances each of which faced and or are directly adjacent to the Rodgers family civic address of 15 Fisher Avenue; two houses built facing each other so that the dining room and kitchen windows of 15 Fisher Avenue, directly face the entrances of civic address 29 Marshall Street, and 31 Marshall Street which the self affirmed Neil Rodgers by Affidavit affirmed that he is a Police informant working closely with Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE utilizes as he and his family together maintained a constant surveillance of Andr Murrays duplex residence, front door entrances ; (10) I Andr Murray while travelling by bicycle within THE CITY OF FREDERICTON, May 7, 2008, was intercepted by Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE then without warning physically attacked resulting in injuries by the conduct of Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE during the false arrest and improper procedure thereof. (11) I Andr Murray, required months of physical therapy, to recover from my physical injuries, thereby suffered at the hands of Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, moreover, the subject injuries are entirely as a consequence of the actions of Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE during the subject May 7, 2008 incident. (12) I Andr Murray have, immediately following said subject May 7, 2008 incident, been continuously pursuing remedy regarding this matter. (13) Tuesday, May 5, 2009, at 3:34 PM, I Andr Murray did file a complaint against Members of the FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, regarding the May 7, 2008 incident, with the NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION. The subject Complaint, of which was titled Complaint against members of the Fredericton City Police Department was sent by Andr Murray using e-mail: andremurraynow@gmail.com to: NBPC@gnb.ca (14) May 5, 2009, at 4:13 PM I Andr Murray did receive an acknowledgement from Jocelyn (Josh) Ouellette Executive Director of The NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION, indicating therefore receipt of my e-mail correspondence, regarding my complaint against members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, subject incident occurring May 7, 2008. (15) Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:26 AM I Andr Murray did receive a e-mail reply from from: S/Sgt. Daniel R. Copp, Office of Professional Standards of FREDERICTON 3

POLICE FORCE, therefore, acknowledging receipt of my complaint, S/Sgt. Daniel R. Copp using his email address: danny.copp@fredericton.ca to: Andremurraynow@gmail.com the subject of the email was Your complaint against members of the FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE (16) Chief of Police Barry MacKnight, did write a letter, Dated September 29, 2009, Notifying me Andr Murray of his decision to summarily dismiss my complaint, FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE File number, (FPF File 09- 10302) regarding Andr Murrays complaint, against the FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, regarding the May 7, 2008, incident. RTIPPA Request - Police Commission file number 2010-RTIPPA-02. (17) Contrary to reasonable or common sense behavior, the subsequent and utterly absurd or ridiculous justification of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE regarding the above mentioned subject incident of May 7, 2008, obliged, that I Andr Murray, September 27, 2010, pursuant to RTIPPA: Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.B. 2009, c. R-10.6 apply for access to correspondence and other documents, in the possession of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE which may reveal other possible motivations for the outrageously violent behavior and consequential physical injury inflicted upon Andr Murray by members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, who unlawfully, although purposefully detained Andre Murray, so that Trina Rodgers could be transported by a detective in a unmarked Police car so that Trina Rodgers could be at the scene observing therefore witnessing from a front seat of an unmarked Police Detective Saunders car. (18) I Andr Murray as a consequence of having filed complaints with both NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION (File: 2110 C- 09- 09), and FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE regarding the herewithin above mentioned Wednesday, May 7, 2008, reasonably: false arrest of Applicant Andr Murray, for these reasons according to ratified New Brunswick legislation known as RTIPPA any applicant may under this legislation obtain access to subsequent investigations and results/conclusions determined thereof, (in this case) to peruse relevant documents according to a RTIPPA application: Police Commission file number 2010-RTIPPA-02. (19) Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:27 PM, I Andr Murray, received a letter from The New Brunswick Police Commission, which read After seeking third party intervention from the FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, we are partially granting access to the requested records. The letter indicated that The NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION would be disclosing a portion of the records requested, while notably confirming that the Chief of Police for FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE was involved in that decision. (20) December 9, 2010, I Andr Murray did receive a reply correspondence from New Brunswick Police Commission, stating, inter alia, that, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION in spite of RTIPPA (Police Commission file number 2010-RTIPPA-02) nevertheless, however, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION was declining Andr Murray full access to documents in their possession which are specific to this subject matter, further, in particular an Appendix C which consists of the investigation report prepared by 4

the FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE and copy provided to New Brunswick Police Commission. Please Note NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION is prepared to provide only partial disclosure of the investigation report, with therefore, the majority of the document has simply had personal (or possibly actionable) information deleted or blacked out;. (21) Despite RTIPPA legislation compelling NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION to provide certain documents in their possession, however NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION confirmed verbally with Andre Murray also has further placed into written correspondence addressed to Andr Murray the substance of which correspondence denies Andre Murray to full access to documents in their possession, specific to this matter - 48 pages of Appendix C. (22) Furthermore, January 13, 2011, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION not only refused Andre Murray access to documents in their possession; however, what NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION did provide for examination had the substance blackened out, from the above mentioned subject documents as requested by Andr Murray pursuant to NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION File: 2110 C- 09- 09 further, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION File: 2010 RTIPPA- 02. (23) I Andr Murray, subsequently, having reviewed subject NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION File: (File: 2110 C- 09- 09 ) 2010 RTIPPA- 02, subject investigation report: the Summary and Conclusion revealed the cause of Applicant Andr Murrays physical battery and arrest has resulted and been caused by Police informants whose identities have simply had all personal (or possibly actionable) information deleted or blacked out including their identity - the following is an exact excerpt: Investigative Summary blacked out, a blacked out has provided a statement that he observed a male closely matching the description of a suspect in some type of crime, as a result he contacted the police station, and Cst. Debbie Stafford attended the area and attempted to stop and identify the individual. (24) The herein above mentioned partial disclosure did reveal that the Fredericton Police were called by a he who gave a description of he observed a male closely matching the description of a suspect in some type of crime that was the actual reason why I was accosted by Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE May 7, 2008.

March 5. 2009 incident (25) FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE claim to have investigated Andre Murrays complaints against the subject Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, who were reportedly required to withstand scrutiny of a Police investigation regarding possible criminality of their own conduct, furthermore, FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE did investigate in regards to service of policy, because of the complaint filed November 5, 2009, by Plaintiff Andr Murray, resulting from the March 5, 2009, incident of Andre Murray being attacked by Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, this occurred while merely shovelling snow from Andre Murrays driveway. FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE would have contacted Neil Rodgers, regarding his and or Trina Rodgers involvement in the March 5, 5

2009, incident. A letter, which I Andr Murray received from Staff Sergeant Katherin Alcorn, July 15, 2010, did state that evidence which Staff Sergeant Katherin Alcorn did consider was telephone conversation recordings to dispatch indicates conclusively, that Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE did respond to a telephone call, which resulted in Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE arriving at Andr Murrays Marshall Street residence location. The conclusion one reasonably reaches and I Andr Murray verily believe to be true, from the above excerpt, is that someone did contact FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, I Andr Murray verily believe that it was either Neil Rodgers or Trina Rodgers and as a consequence FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE would have contacted the witness(s) involved, Defendant Neil Rodgers and or his wife Trina Rodgers to confirm his or her testimony of the event. (26) I Andr Murray do verily believe, that, the allegations made, against Trina Rodgers regarding the March 05, 2009, incident are justified. In a response to a NOTICE OF ACTION AND STATEMENT OF CLAIM filed by Andre Murray as (Court File Number F/C/45/11) with Court of Queens Bench, Fredericton, Trial Division (naming both Neil Rodgers and Tina Rodgers as defendants), Defendant Neil Rodgers and Defendant Trina Rodgers provided a Statement of Defence and Counter Claim Dated October 4, 2011, paragraph 1, wherein Defendant Neil Rodgers and Defendant Trina Rodgers did affirm that: Trina Rodgers may have contacted the Fredericton Police Force, however if she did, the phone call would have been in regards to Andr Murray. Which is, a not so clever way, of obfuscating the fact, that Defendant (in that matter) Trina Rodgers did indeed call FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, as alleged by Plaintiff Andre Murray (in that matter of Court File Number F/C/45/11) regarding the subject March 05, 2009, incident.) ,

Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers (27) The significant deviant behaviour of Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers included a unrelenting, continuous, day by day, harassment campaign beginning each day with, either or, Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers observing Andr Murray as his daily property management chores were conducted about the yard, this subject harassment was achieved by various means, although became repetitive since the initial encounter with the Rodgers family in year 2005. Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers have apparently amused themselves, by bearing false witness against Andr Murray, thereby complaining to FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE making frivolous complaints, therefore, always realized to be consequentially lacking any substance, whatsoever. (28) I Andr Murray verily believe that were the Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE required by this honourable Court to produce: the chronological history of, and substance thereof, all telephone reports, produced since 2005 made by the Neil and Trina Rodgers to FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, it would, consequentially, therefore, be realized that although the repetitious complaints were at times on a daily basis, and at other times several times on the same day, despite the absurdity of the false alarm calls made by the Rodgers, nevertheless, Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE continued to converge at the 29 and 31 Marshall Street residential property of Andr Murray conducting 6

investigations, which, since 2005 have never resulted in any charges being laid against Andre Murray. (29) Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers method of harassing Andr Murray was not only confined to bearing false witness against him, therefore, manipulating Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE as a weapon to be deployed, to disrupt Andr Murrays peaceful enjoyment of his residence; other methods of harassment included Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers therefore uttering obscenities by yelling over the 100 linear foot privacy fence, which Andre Murray was forced to erect at his own expense, between the Rodgers residence and Andre Murrays residence houses, which the entire 100 feet was methodically torn down and destroyed late one evening by unknown people; nevertheless Andre Murray erected a subsequent fence in a attempt to maintain privacy of his coming and goings; please note: each fence was located on the property, which Andr Murray was leasing and directly between the Rodgers family house and Andre Murrays residence, out of sight of all other neighbours, despite this isolated location, each fence was destroyed apparently without the Rodgers knowledge, despite the location of the fences being only fifteen feet distance from the very windows used by the Rodgers to maintain their surveillance of Andre Murray as the Police informants the Rodgers have claimed to be, by Affidavit. (30) I Andre Murray verily believe that Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers evidently realized that uttering threats and or obscenities (as were constantly occurring) therefore, directed at Andre Murray, across the dividing property line, did not provoke Andr Murray; the Rodgers escaladed the harassment by actually departing from their property and entering onto the leasehold property of Andr Murray and using video cameras, they continued their harassment campaign throughout all seasons, literally following Andr Murray about his property, as he performs his daily outdoor chores. Apparently at a certain point the subject methods of victimizing of Andr Murray was not satisfactory in achieving the reasonably irrational goals of Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers, at which time Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers then began to stalk Andr Murray as he departed from his property by bicycle or on foot as a pedestrian, which was relatively easy for them to pursue him in their automobiles. (31) I Andre Murray verily believe Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers from their automobiles using cell phone communication maintained a surveillance of Andr Murray, as he travelled about THE CITY OF FREDERICTON various precincts and or Wards, although the severity was noticeably greatest when within one mile of his Marysville residence. (32) I Andre Murray verily believe Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers did continuously and repeatedly run over onto Andre Murrays property to take pictures of Andr Murray, while Andre Murray was doing mundane activities, such as was mowing the lawn; this video surveillance of Neil Rodgers was often from distances uncomfortably close and often not less than five feet separation, while further aggravating the situation as Neil Rodgers would be simultaneously yelling objectionable and offensive obscenities accusing Andr Murray of being a homosexual, thereafter, Neil Rodgers could be heard describing explicitly perverted sexual acts, which Neil Rodgers would attribute to Andre Murray; moreover, in each such event Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE would arrive soon after the utterances of Neil Rodgers and or at all other times within thirty to 45 minutes of Andr Murray becoming visible outside of his residential duplex building/house at the Marshall Street 7

Property, at civic address 29 and or 31 Marshall Street, in the city of Fredericton, New Brunswick. On many occasions Neil Rodgers in his truck, did follow Andr Murray all about the Marysville area, harassing Andr Murray and further shouting from his open pick-up truck window, objectionable accusations and generally offensive obscenities at Andr Murray. (33) Please note that I Andr Murray, served FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, with an AMENDED NOTICE OF ACTION WITH STATEMENT OF CLAIM ATTACHED (FORM 16A), Dated September, 8, 2011, Court File Number: F/C/45/11; however on the same afternoon of 9th day, of September, 2011, as I was attempting Court Document Process Service upon Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers at their residence, for the first time since year 2005, the Rodgers now began to avoid any contact with me, thereby, refusing to answer their door and thereafter the Rodgers ceased to be outdoors (as is their common practice) or even leave the house (if they observed me outside) presumably in an attempt to not be Process Served the subject Court documents; I would attend daily until finally September 15, 2011, surprised Neil Rodgers. (34) I Andr Murray verily believe that Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, following the Process Service of the relevant Court documents upon FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, 9th day, of September, 2011, did contact and advise Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers, and as a result of this subject Police contact and advise, Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers did temporarily discontinue their usual course of confrontational conduct directed towards me, and alternatively initiated avoidance strategies regarding their personal movement, therefore, began a course of conduct intended to frustrate Andr Murrays Court Document Process Service attempts upon them, which succeeded until September 15, 2011. (35) I Andre Murray verily believe that Process Serving of Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers became very difficult, because Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers were no longer making their daily routine appearances outside their house, and when I did approach their house they would run into their house, locking the door, refusing to answer my knocks upon the entrance door to their house, no answer to my knocking was forthcoming. (36) Finally I Andr Murray was successful at service, of the relevant Court documents, September 15, 2011, by driving up their driveway in the back seat of a marked cab van, and further I had two witnesses, therefore, witness me Process Serve Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers, by way of leaving with Neil Rodgers a copy of the subject Court Documents. Neil Rodgers did at that time attempt to evade service, first attempting to run into the house, and secondly denying repeatedly that though he was served according to the Rules of Court, that he was (based or incoherent claims), not at all served, however, by Neil Rodgers simply dropping the documents onto the ground, Neil Rodgers then erroneously claimed improper service. (37) Since that time Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers have made it very difficult to serve them with prerequisite Court documents, even frustrating other Court document Servers, who I Andr Murray did retain to effect service upon Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers. Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers have refused Court document service by 8

Registered mail, while at the same time unreasonably requiring that they Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers must be served only by professional process server. (38) In Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers Statement of Defence and Counter Claim October 4, 2011, (which was not Process Served upon Andre Murray until two weeks past allowable time according to rules of Court) they did state that: Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers have never ridden in the back of a police car, either marked, or unmarked. Which is, a not so clever way, of obfuscating the fact, that Trina Rodgers did not deny sitting in the front seat, of the unmarked Police Cruiser, as witnessed and evidenced within the affidavit of Andr Murray, regarding the subject May 7, 2008, incident. Andr Murray verily believes, that the claims made, against Trina Rodgers regarding the May 07, 2008, incident are justified and the Amended Statement of Claim deserves to be heard on its merits (following discovery). (39) Andr Murray verily believe, that the claims made against Neil Rodgers regarding the May 07, 2008, incident are justified, as evidenced by the Investigative Summary provided by NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE COMMISSION and authored by agents on behalf of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, furthermore, a AMENDED NOTICE OF ACTION WITH STATEMENT OF CLAIM ATTACHED (FORM 16A), Dated September, 8, 2011, Court File Number: F/C/45/11, deserves to be heard on its merits. (40) March 5, 2009, Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE on advise of the Rodgers false arrest Andr Murray resulting in physical injury at the hands of Members of the Fredericton Police Force. I Andr Murray have consequentially been unable to work (full capacity) since the subject assault and battery of March 5, 2009. Please note: I Andr Murray have been required by my doctor to wear an arm brace and attend physiotherapy, which subject physiotherapy continues to this day, resulting from those subject injuries which are not yet healed. (41) Late 2009, I Andr Murray did file a complaint with FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, regarding the herein above mentioned subject March 5. 2009, incident, involving Police Assault, Battery and unlawful Arrest upon myself, Andre Murray. This subject March 5, 2009, incident complaint, is found within New Brunswick Police Commission File: (File: 9000 C- 09- 61 ) which also exists as a request according to Right to Information legislation as File: 2010 RTIPPA- 01 regarding the March 5, 2009 Police Assault, involving Battery and False Arrest, of which New Brunswick Police Commission have advised me, that I have not received complete disclosure. Nevertheless, documents which New Brunswick Police Commission have released into my possession revealed what the attending Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE did regarding the March 5, 2009, Assault, involving Battery and Arrest, further that they were being directed and or guided, to Andr Murray, by telephone communication with the Police Department dispatcher (as it does appear) moreover, although Andr Murray had removed all of his winter clothing all accessories including hats scarves and gloves in a effort to maintain a lower body temperature, to complete the laborious task of shovelling out the snow from his driveway on a warm sunny day. Therefore, it could not possibly be true, that a distinctly identifiable man of Andr Murrays shape, size complexion - blond color of hair, could possibly be mistaken for anyone else other than who he actually is. March 5, 2009, during daylight hours; I Andr Murray 9

having just finished shovelling the driveway to my residential dwelling, at 29 Marshall Street, and 31 Marshall Street, in the City of Fredericton, was again assaulted, battered and arrested by members of the Fredericton Police. Please note: RTIPPA inquiries revealed that members of the FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE attending the residence of Andr Murray, March 5, 2009 had been directed by people (identities concealed) further, Police informants, who by telephone transmission identified Andr Murray to the FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE as being outside his residence shovelling snow from the driveway. (42) Andr Murray has been subjected to an apparent co operative effort and or plan of action designed to achieve a particular goal (object yet unknown) evidentially, there has been since year 2005, an organized harassment campaign implemented against Andr Murray, ever since Andr Murray became a Leasehold Tenant residing at duplex civic address 29 Marshall Street and 31 Marshall Street, in the City of Fredericton. There can be little question of the magnitude of this group which has its tentacles within City Hall of THE CITY OF FREDERICTON which reasonably extended its influence Someone and employing certain Members of local FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE. However, with false and with unfounded allegations, these victimizers have united in their common goal to victimize Andr Murray, in this case becoming the victim of repeated violence at the hands of the same repeat offenders who are Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE. I Andr Murray verily believe that those persons making the most significant fraudulent representations against me include both Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers. Neil Rodgers (43) FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE did investigate the subject members of the Fredericton Police Force, were reportedly required to withstand scrutiny of an Police investigation into the possible criminality of their conduct furthermore did investigate in regards to service of policy because of the complaint filed May 5, 2009 by Andr Murray, resulting from the May 7, 2008 incident. The FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE reasonably would have contacted Neil Rodgers, regarding his involvement in the May 7, 2008 incident as alleged by Andr Murray. The summary to the subject Police Report does state : Investigative Summary (blacked out), a (blacked out) has provided a statement that he observed a male closely matching the description of a suspect in some type of crime, as a result he contacted the police station, and Cst. Debbie Stafford attended the area and attempted to stop and identify the individual. Emphasis added by me. The conclusion one reaches and I Andr Murray verily believe to be true, is that from the above excerpt is that a male (the alleges this was Neil Rodgers), did contact the Fredericton Police Force, as a consequence the FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE would have contacted Neil Rodgers to confirm his testimony of the event. (44) Further Neil Rodgers would have been contacted regarding the September 27, 2010, filing of a request pursuant to Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.B. 2009, c. R-10.6, through which I Andr Murray did apply for relevant documentation (Police Commission file number 2010-RTIPPA-02). FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE was contacted regarding disclosure of the subject documentation and the balance of probabilities is that Neil Rodgers would have been contacted, especially since the RTIPPA legislation 10

intended that all parties who may be affected must be advised, specifically, to enquire with Neil Rodgers if he consents to providing Andr Murray, with the information as requested. I Andr Murray do know that when someone is requesting information pursuant to Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.B. 2009, c. R-10.6, as I did have occasion to experience on the receiving end, then as a named person within the subject file of interest, the Public body holding the file, is as a matter of policy and protocol, compelled to contact the named party and enquire if that party does consent to disclosure. (45) I verily believe because of (Police Commission file number 2010-RTIPPA-02) and ot the herein above mentioned complaint that FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE did investigate the subject members of the Fredericton Police Force, who were reportedly required to withstand scrutiny of a Police investigation into the possible criminality of their conduct; moreover FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE did investigate in regards to service of policy, because of the complaint filed November 5, 2009, by Andr Murray, resulting from the March 5, 2009, incident. FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE would have contacted Neil Rodgers, regarding his or Trina his wifes, involvement in the March 5, 2009, incident as alleged by Andr Murray. A letter, which I Andr Murray received from Staff Sergeant Katherin Alcorn, July 15, 2010, did confirm existence of evidence, which Staff Sergeant Katherin Alcorn did consider was telephone conversation recordings to dispatch which indicates conclusively, that FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE did respond to a telephone call, which resulted in Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE arriving at Andr Murrays Marshall Street duplex residence location. The conclusion one must reasonably reach and that I Andr Murray verily believe to be true, from the above excerpt, provided by Staff Sergeant Katherin Alcorn, is that someone did contact FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, I Andr Murray verily believe, that it was either Neil Rodgers or Trina Rodgers who did contact FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE and as a consequence FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE would have contacted the witness involved namely, as I verily believe are Neil Rodgers or his wife Trina Rodgers to reasonably confirm his or her testimony of the event, inter alia. (46) February 23, 2011, Neil Rodgers did make oath and swear an affidavit, once again bearing false witness against Andre Murray wherein Neil Rodgers affirmed that made false and untrue claims regarding a fictitious, fugitive from justice, who Neil Rodgers further claimed Andre Murray was giving shelter to and or harbouring a criminal; this I verily believe was one more effort to have members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE once again disrupt Andr Murrays peace and quiet; therefore Neil Rodgers lied gave false evidence under oath that Andr Murray was (to the effect) harbouring a fugitive at his 29 and or 31 Marshall Street, residence in the city of Fredericton N.B., despite Neil Rodgers never having claimed to have actually witnessed this fictitious person at Andr Murrays residence. Never the less this subject reasonably malicious Affidavit of Neil Rodgers resulted in members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE attending the property of civic address 29 and or 31 Marshall Street, city of Fredericton, N.B at which time members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE incredible as it may seem did without Court issued search warrants, therefore did: contrary to criminal code Breaking and Enter the private residential premises of Andr Murray resulting in Andr Murray being physically injured in the process of placing Andre Murray under arrest. I Andr Murray verily believe that this is another example of the 11

bad faith claims made by Neil Rodgers which continue to be frivolous, vexatious and an obstruction of justice, inter alia. (47) Neil Rodgers in a February 23, 2011, by sworn Affidavit, submitted by Neil Rodgers to the Court of Queens Bench, Fredericton, Division, did admit to maintaining a constant surveillance of Andr Murray, both at Andre Murrays Marshall Street, Fredericton N.B. residence, inter alia, consequentially, therefore I verily believe this to be a true admission of Neil Rodgers engaging in invasion of my privacy regarding my affairs; furthermore, is conclusive evidence of Neil Rodgers, having a illegal and unlawful interest in Andr Murrays affairs. I Andr Murray verily believe that this herein subject Affidavit of Neil Rodgers is significant evidence that my claims regarding the malicious deviant behaviour of Neil Rodgers are valid and well founded. Trina Rodgers (48) FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE did investigate the subject members of the Fredericton Police Force, were reportedly required to withstand scrutiny of an Police investigation into the possible criminality of their conduct, furthermore did investigate in regards to service of policy because of the complaint filed May 5, 2009 by Andr Murray, resulting from the subject May 7, 2008 incident. FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE would have reasonably contacted Trina Rodgers, regarding her alleged involvement in the May 7, 2008 incident, as alleged by Andr Murray. I Andr Murray verily believe that Trina Rodgers was sitting in the front seat of the unmarked Police Car driven by Constable Michael Saunders. The conclusion one reaches and I Andr Murray verily believe to be true, is that Trina Rodgers, was the witness and participant in the May 7, 2009, incident, as alleged by Andr Murray, consequentially FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE would have contacted Trina Rodgers to confirm her testimony of the event thereby making a Record of the events of first of all coordinating the transportation of Trina Rodgers and secondly to eye witness and identify Andr Murray. (49) I verily believe that Trina Rodgers would have been contacted regarding the September 27, 2010, filing by Andre Murray of a request pursuant to Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.B. 2009, c. R-10.6, through which, I Andr Murray did apply for certain relevant documentation concerning Trina Rodgers, inter alia (Police Commission file number 2010-RTIPPA-02). The FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE was reasonably contacted regarding disclosure of the subject documentation and the balance of probabilities are such, that Trina Rodgers would have been contacted, specifically, to enquire with her, if she did consent to providing Andr Murray with the requested information concerning matters in which Trina Rodgers would be named. I Andr Murray am aware that when anyone requests information pursuant to Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.B. 2009, c. R-10.6, as I did have occasion to experience on the receiving end, then as a named person within the subject file of interest, the Public body holding the file, is as a matter of policy and protocol, compelled to contact the named party and enquire if that party does consent to disclosure. (50) FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE did investigate the subject members of Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, who were reportedly required to withstand 12

scrutiny of a Police investigation into the possible criminality of their conduct, furthermore, FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE did investigate in regards to service of policy, the complaint filed November 5, 2009, by Andr Murray, resulting from the March 5. 2009, incident. FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE would have contacted Trina Rodgers regarding her involvement in the May 7, 2008 incident as alleged by Andr Murray. A letter, which I Andr Murray received from Staff Sergeant Katherin Alcorn, July 15, 2010, did state that evidence which Staff Sergeant Katherin Alcorn did consider was telephone conversation recordings to dispatch which indicates conclusively that FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE did respond to a telephone call, which resulted in the FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE arriving at Andr Murrays Marshall Street residence location. The conclusion one reaches and I Andr Murray verily believe to be true, is that from the above provided excerpt of Staff Sergeant Katherin Alcorn, someone did contact the Fredericton Police Force by telephone, furthermore, I Andr Murray verily believe that it was either Neil Rogers or Trina Rogers and as a consequence the FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE would have contacted the witness(s) as the case may be, namely, Neil Rodgers and or Trina Rodgers to confirm his or her testimony of the event. (51) I verily believe, Trina Rodgers would have been contacted regarding my September 27, 2010, filing of a request pursuant to Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.B. 2009, c. R-10.6, through which I Andr Murray did apply for relevant documentation concerning Trina Rodgers [New Brunswick Police Commission File: (File: 9000 C- 09- 61 ) 2010 RTIPPA- 01] FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE was contacted regarding disclosure of the subject documentation and the balance of probabilities is, that Trina Rodgers would have been contacted, specifically, to enquire with Trina Rodgers if she did consent to providing Andr Murray with the information as requested. I Andr Murray do know that when anyone requests information pursuant to Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.B. 2009, c. R-10.6, as I did have occasion to experience on the receiving end, then as a named person within the subject file of interest, the Public body holding the file, is as a matter of policy and protocol, compelled to contact the named party and enquire if that party does consent to disclosure. (52) In Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers Statement of Defence and Counter Claim October 4, 2011, paragraph 1, they did state that: Trina Rodgers may have contacted the Fredericton Police Force, however if she did, the phone call would have been in regards to Andr Murray. Which is, a not so clever way, of obfuscating the fact, that Trina Rodgers did avoid denying that she was calling the FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, as alleged by Andr Murray, regarding the subject March 05, 2009 incident. Andr Murray does verily believe, that the claims made, against Trina Rodgers regarding the March 05, 2009, incident are justified, further, that the Amended Statement of Claim deserves to be heard on its merits. Exhibits (53) Chief of Police Barry MacKnight, did write a letter, Dated October 28, 2011, Notifying me, Andr Murray of his decision to summarily dismiss my complaint, FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE File number, (FPF File 11- 23456) regarding Andr Murrays complaint, against FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, regarding October 5, 2011, an incident involving Constable David Beck. A copy of this letter is attached hererto as Exhibit A. 13

(54) Chief of Police Barry MacKnight, did write a letter, Dated October 28, 2011, thereby Notifying me Andr Murray of his decision to summarily dismiss my complaint, FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE File number, (FPF File 11- 19229) regarding Andr Murrays complaint, against FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, regarding the April, 2012, incident involving Constable Jeff Lingley. A copy of this letter is attached hererto as Exhibit B. (55) February 23, 2011, Neil Rodgers did provide an Affidavit to Court of Queens Bench, Moncton, Trial Division, Dated: February 23, 2011, which made false and untrue claims regarding a fictitious character who Neil Rodgers continued to make unfound claims regarding outstanding arrest warrant(s) further that this subject fictitious character was essentially being harboured at the residence of Andr Murray civic address 29 and or 31 Marshall Street, City of Fredericton N.B. a residential duplex, despite this, Neil Rodgers confirms to not having observed this fictitious criminal character. I Andr Murray verily believe that the claims made by Neil Rodgers were made in bad faith, meant to cause vexatious results, therefore potentially causing harm to Andre Murray (which was actually the result) and I therefore verily believe this subject falsified Affidavit is evidence of Neil Rodgers obstruction of justice. A copy of this Affidavit is attached hereto as Exhibit C. (56) April 16, 2012, Constable Jeff Lingley did compel Andre Murray, under threat of incarceration, who Andre Murray while under protest and duress was forced to sign a Undertaking to a Police Officer. A copy of this Affidavit is attached hereto as Exhibit D. (57) November 21, 2011, Statement of Claim Form 16C, (page 1 and 2 only) File number F/C/201/11 on which is named both Constable A Yerxa and Constable D. Beck. A copy of this Affidavit is attached hereto as Exhibit E. (58) In Neil Rodgers and Trina Rodgers Statement of Defence and Counter Claim October 4, 2011, paragraph 1, they did state that: Trina Rodgers may have contacted the Fredericton Police Force, however if she did, the phone call would have been in regards to Andr Murray. Which is, a not so clever way of obfuscating the fact, and is further evidence that Trina Rodgers did telephone call FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE, as alleged by Andr Murray, regarding instigating the subject March 05, 2009, incident. Andr Murray does verily believe, that the claims made, against Trina Rodgers regarding the March 05, 2009, incident are justified. Furthermore, the Amended Statement of Claim deserves to be heard on its merits. A copy of this Statement of Defence and Counter Claim is attached hereto as Exhibit F (59) Both accusers Neil Rodgers and son Thomas Neil Rodgers provided fraudulent witness Statements, depicting false representation of the events which transpired April 10, 2012, at civic address: 15 Fisher Ave, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3A 4J1, involving Neil Rodgers and myself Andre Murray. (60) Please see April 23, 2012 Witness Statement of Neil Rodgers, File: 12-6603 is attached hereto as G 14