Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Quick Fix: No
Origin: Fed UP # 81
Tentative Agreement: No
Change:
* * * * *
(f) Definition. The Secretary considers a A family member
includes of a person's family to be his or her --
(1) Parent or stepparent, sibling or step-sibling, spouse,
or child or stepchild, or grandchild or step-grandchild;
(2) Spouse's parent or stepparent, sibling or step-sibling,
child or stepchild, or grandchild or step-grandchild;
(3) Child's spouse; and
(4) Sibling's spouse.
* * * * *
* * * * *
(e) Excluded transactions. A change in ownership and
control reported under §600.21 and otherwise subject to
this section does not include a transfer of ownership and
control of all or part of an owner’s undivided interest in
an institution, the institution’s parent corporation, or
other legal entity that has signed covered by the
institution’s Program Participation Agreementupon the
retirement or death of the owner, to --
(1) A From an owner to a “family member" of that ownerof
the owner's family, as describeddefined in §600.3021 (f); or
(2) Upon the retirement or death of the owner, to a A
person with an ownership interest in the institution who
has been involved in management of the institution for at
least two years preceding the transfer and who established
and retained the ownership interest for at least two years
prior to the transfer.
* * * * *
§ 668.174 Past performance.
* * * * *
(c) Ownership interest.
* * *
(4) The Secretary considers a "Family member" is defined in
§600.21(f) of a person's family to be a parent, sibling,
spouse, child, spouse's parent or sibling, or sibling's or
child's spouse.
* * * * *
read as follows:
* * * * *
grandchild;
grandchild;
(3) Child's spouse; and
public institutions.
* * * * *
as defined in §600.21(f); or
read a follows:
1091B, 1092, 1094, 1099C, and 1099c1, unless otherwise
noted.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Quick Fix: No
Tentative Agreement: No
Change:
period; or
became ineligible—
contribution; and
or
(B) For an award under the Federal Perkins Loan or
student.
are satisfied-
provisions of §668.22(a)(4);
late disbursement later than 120 days after the date of the
became ineligible;
intended; and
§682.604(c)(5)(i)–(iii) or §685.303(b)(4)(i)(A)–(C).
read as follows:
noted.
* * * * *
period; or
became ineligible—
(i) Except in the case of a PLUS loan, the Secretary
contribution; and
or
student.
are satisfied--
provisions of §668.22(a)(4);
the amount of title IV, HEA funds that the student (or
late disbursement later than 120 days after the date of the
became ineligible;
intended; and
Quick Fix: No
Tentative Agreement: No
Change:
* * * * *
* * *
(3)(i) An institution is “required to take attendance” if
an outside entity the institution is required to take
attendance for some or all of its students by an entity
outside of the institution (such as the institution's
accrediting agency, or a state agency) has a requirement,
as determined by the entity, that the institution take
attendance. for some or all of its students.
* * * * *
follows:
noted.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
* * *
* * * * *
(iii) If an outside entity requires an institution to take attendance for only a portion
of the payment period or period of enrollment, as applicable, the institution must use its
this section for only the period for which attendance taking is required.
* * * * *
Proposed Regulatory Language
Committee II – Program Issues
Quick Fix: No
Tentative Agreement: No
Change:
* * * * *
* * * * *
read a follows:
1091B, 1092, 1094, 1099C, and 1099c1, unless otherwise
noted.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
12-month period;
* * * * *
and dated request that includes the reason for the request
* * * * *
Proposed Regulatory Language
Committee II – Program Issues
Quick Fix: No
Tentative Agreement: No
Change:
the institution.
student withdrew;
student withdrew;
under §668.22); or
(i) Equal 25 percent of the total amount of unearned title IV, HEA program funds that
it returned or should have returned under §668.22 during the institution’s most
recently completed fiscal year; and
(ii) Be submitted by the institution no later than 30
(3) An institution may delay submitting a letter of credit and request the Secretary to
reconsider a finding made in its most recent compliance audit or review report that it
failed to return unearned title IV, HEA program funds in a timely manner if--
(i) The institution submits documentation that shows that the unearned title IV, HEA
program funds were not returned in a timely manner solely because of exceptional
circumstances beyond the institution’s control and that the institution would not have
come within the provisions of paragraph (c)(1) of this section had it not been for these
exceptional circumstances; and
(ii) The institution’s request, along with the documentation described in paragraph
(d)(3)(i) of this section, is submitted to the Secretary no later than 30 days after the
institution submits its compliance audit, or no later than 30 days after the Secretary or
guaranty agency either issues a review report or sends a written notice to the
institution requesting the letter of credit.
(4) If the Secretary denies the institution’s request under
follows:
noted.
follows:
the institution.
student withdrew;
student withdrew;
under §668.22); or
(i) Equal 25 percent of the total amount of unearned title IV, HEA program funds that
it returned or should have returned under §668.22 during the institution’s most
recently completed fiscal year; and
(ii) Be submitted by the institution no later than 30
(3) An institution may delay submitting a letter of credit and request the Secretary to
reconsider a finding made in its most recent compliance audit or review report that it
failed to return unearned title IV, HEA program funds in a timely manner if--
(i) The institution submits documentation that shows that the unearned title IV, HEA
program funds were not returned in a timely manner solely because of exceptional
circumstances beyond the institution’s control and that the institution would not have
come within the provisions of paragraph (c)(1) of this section had it not been for these
exceptional circumstances; and
(ii) The institution’s request, along with the documentation described in paragraph
(d)(3)(i) of this section, is submitted to the Secretary no later than 30 days after the
institution submits its compliance audit, or no later than 30 days after the Secretary or
guaranty agency either issues a review report or sends a written notice to the
institution requesting the letter of credit.
(4) If the Secretary denies the institution’s request under paragraph (d)(3) of this
section, the Secretary notifies the institution of the date it must submit the letter of
credit described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
* * * * *
Proposed Regulatory Language
Committee II - Program Issues
Quick Fix: No
Updated Information
Since 3/6-8 Meetings: The NCAA requires its Division I
participants to provide this information by October 15, and
we have been told that these institutions would be unlikely
to amend that data to reflect any changes resulting from
its annual financial audit. Given that information and
that advocates not represented at this negotiating session
have expressed concerns to the Department about modifying
the disclosure date, we suggest an alternative approach to
address the initial concern expressed in Fed Up that the
information provided in these disclosures has not been
audited and that when comparing the initial data to the
audited data there could be discrepancies. The Department
will notify institutions at the time we are collecting the
data that we are aware that the data may not have been
audited prior to its submission.
Tentative Agreement: No
Proposed Regulatory Language
Committee II Program Issues
Quick Fix: No
Origin: Fed Up #94
Issue: Student Eligibility – Regaining
Eligibility
Regulatory Cite: None
Summary of Requested Change: Establish uniform retroactive
treatment for ineligible students who regain eligibility
within a payment period.
Regulatory Change: None.
Reason: The regulations do not specifically speak to when a
student gains or regains eligibility. However, the
Department has, over the years and in a number of ways,
provided the following guidance in this area.
The circumstances addressed by this guidance are those where
the student resolves an eligibility issue related to when
the student:
Becomes a “regular student”
Resolves a default or overpayment problem
Is no longer incarcerated
Becomes a high school graduate or successfully passes an approved ATB test
Satisfies the citizenship requirements
Registers with Selective Service
Is considered to be making satisfactory academic progress
For the FFEL and Direct Loan programs, the student becomes
eligible for the enrollment period in which the eligibility
issue was resolved.
In general a student becomes eligible for Pell Grant and
campusbased aid beginning with the payment period in which
the eligibility issue was resolved. The exceptions are that
if the initial ineligibility was due to a question related
to the citizenship requirements, valid social security
number or selective service registration the student becomes
eligible for Pell and campusbased aid for the entire award
year.
Updated Information Since 3/68 Meetings: The negotiators
asked the Department to look at the provision that allows a
student who is in default on a Perkins Loan who brings the
loan current to be eligible to receive additional Perkins
Loans, but does not allow the student to regain eligibility
for the other Title IV programs. That provision is
statutory (sections 464(b) and 462(g)(1)(E) of the HEA) and
applies exclusively to Perkins Loans.
The negotiators asked the Department to review its current
policies concerning when a student establishes or regains
eligibility for the Title IV programs and to consider
applying the policy that is in effect for the FFEL and
Direct Loan Programs to all of the Title IV programs. At
this point, the Department is not willing to change the
policy. However, the Department will continue to review
this issue.
Tentative Agreement: No
Proposed Regulatory Language
Committee II Program Issues
Quick Fix: No
Origin: Fed Up #67
Issue: “90/10 Rule”
Regulatory Cite: §600.5
Summary of Requested Change: There were two components to
the request for modification to the regulations governing
the so called “90/10” rule. First was a request to allow
institutions to include in the calculation of their 90/10
ratio the institutional matching that is required under the
FSEOG Program. Second was a request to add distributions
from “IRS 529” tuition savings plans to the list of
exceptions to the general rule that assumes that Title IV
aid paid institutional charges first.
Regulatory Change: None.
Reason: On the first issue, the Department does not agree to
make the suggested change. As was discussed during the
negotiated rulemaking on this issue two years ago, unless
the institution’s matching came from outside of the school,
counting such contribution in the formula (especially in the
denominator) would violate the 90/10 measurement of outside
sources of revenue. It would also be contrary to the “cash
basis” accounting standards that must be used in calculating
the 90/10 ratio.
On the second issue, before proceeding the Department needs
additional information on how an institution would track and
document that payments made by families were derived from
the 529 tuition savings plans and wants to identify what
other information would be available during that process.
The Department also needs additional information on how
monies from 529 tuition savings plans are different from any
other monies that a family uses to satisfy their EFC. One
distinction between a prepaid State tuition plan and a 529
tuition savings plan as we understand it, is that a prepaid
State tuition plan is used as a resource in calculating need
(is excluded from calculating the EFC) and with a 529
tuition savings plan, the funds are counted in determining
the EFC and actually result in increasing the EFC. Further,
part of a 529 tuition savings plan distribution is income to
the beneficiary and could increase the EFC based on the
beneficiary's income.
Updated Information
Since 3/6-8 Meetings:
Quick Fix: No
Origin: Fed Up # 65
Issue: 12 hour rule
Regulatory Cite: §668.2 Definition of "Academic year",
§668.4 Payment Period, §668.8 Eligible
Program, §682.603 FFEL Loan
Certification, §685.301 Direct Loan
Origination, and §690.75 Pell Payment
Eligibility.
Tentative Agreement: No
Change:
§ 668.3 Academic year .
hours.
this section--
baccalaureate degree.
reductions; and
recertification process.
* * * * *
* * * * *
measures
progress in credit hours and has academic terms.
measures
and
program.
program; or
program.
* * * * *
* * * * *
* * * * *
quarter); or
the lesser of --
(A) The length of the student's program at the school;
or
a loan application is --
* * * * *
school.
* * * * *
quarter); or
the lesser of --
or
685.203; or
eligibility.
* * * * *
* * * * *
668, subpart C;
in clock hours; or
* * * * *
Rulemaking:
read as follows:
noted.
hours;
or
hours.
this section--
baccalaureate degree.
reductions; and
recertification process.
measures
measures
and
(ii) The second payment period is the period of time
program; or
or less in length--
program.
instruction.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
examinations.
* * * * *
PART 682--FEDERAL FAMILY EDUCATION LOAN (FFEL) PROGRAM
read as follows:
noted.
* * * * *
read as follows:
noted.
follows:
668, subpart C;
* * * * *
Proposed Regulatory Language
Committee II – Program Issues
Quick Fix: No
Change:
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(22) (i) It will not provide, nor contract with any entity
considered an adjustment.
are not eligible programs under the Title IV, HEA programs.
enrollment.
Rulemaking:
follows:
noted.
(b) * * *
considered an adjustment.
(B) Compensation to recruiters based upon their
are not eligible programs under the Title IV, HEA programs.
hours of instruction.
enrollment.
$100.
* * * *