Green OSV designs meeting high operational requirements

Terje Nordtun Wrtsil

OSV Conference Oslo 11th 12th October 2012

1 Wrtsil

Wrtsil Corporation

20,000 professionals Solutions for

Energy

Marine/ offshore
Capture opportunities and make things happen

Ship Power 26% (34)

Power Plants 34% (31)

Do things better than anyone else in our industry

Our values
Foster openness, respect and trust to create excitement

Listed in Helsinki 4.5 billion turnover Solid financial standing

Services 40% (35)

Content

Introduction
Market drivers, requirements

Some achievements
Efficient designs Use of LNG / Dual Fuel

The VS 485 PSV Mark III

An unique design meeting the highest DP rating without increasing installed propulsion power

Wrtsil

OSV Design Main Drivers

Environment

Operation

Innovation

Key issues for OSV owners / operators

Reliability No equipment break down / downtime Operational capability DP redundancy Green design - Fuel efficiency low emissions Low cost

Conflicting requirements ???

Wrtsil

Green Design and Operation

Green design is about optimised hull lines and the propulsion equipment and solutions that are installed onboard

Green design requires detailed information about how the vessel is operated

Wrtsil

Trend Change
Investment cost focus Using standard solutions
E.G.

Operation Cost, Total Cost of Ownership Design based on specific operational needs

Optimised hull shape in relation to capacities / deadweight / speed Machinery and Propulsion selection/optimization Use of alternative fuels (LNG) Energy management

Wrtsil

Operation Profile
Example 300 T BP AHTS
Mission profile
% of operation time 50 40 30 20 10 0 Steaming 12 knots Steaming 15 knots DynPos light DynPos heavy Bollard

Mission (6000 hrs/year)

Hybrid propulsion

Wrtsil

Green designs some examples

Significant fuel savings Dual-Fuel/ Gas applications
Worlds first LNG powered PSV in successful operations since 2003.

2500 dwt 12 knots Fuel consumption reduced from 26 to 16 tons / 24 h

Fuel cell technology

Flexible fuel (e.g. methanol or LNG) Approx. 30% higher efficiency than diesel engine Extremely low emissions First installation on OSV in operation (350 kW)

1500 dwt 12 knots Fuel consumption reduced from 13 to 7 tons / 24 h

Wrtsil

Emission advantage running on gas

-25%

Emission values [%] 100

Meeting IMO Tier III

90 80 70

-85%

60 50 40

CO2 NOx SOx

-100% -100%
Dual-Fuel engine in gas mode

30 20 10 Diesel engine 0

Particulates

10

Wrtsil

Dual-Fuel The Preferred Ship Solution

Redundancy, backup without interruptions in power or speed. Able to operate on liquid fuel outside ECA-areas Simple system, no additional back up or double gas system needed. DP class fulfilled with single tank/gas supply system Operational flexibility - Vessel re-routing possible, gas supply not a limitation

11

Wrtsil

Innovations - WSD LNG References

VS 499 PSV LNG

VS 4410 DF PSV 2 x VS 4403 PSV LNG VS 493 PSV Avant-LNG

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2012

2013

New concepts

2 x VS 489 PSV LNG 3 x VS 794 CGV VS 481 DF PSV VS 493 PSV Avant-LNG
12 Wrtsil

The VS 485 PSV Mark III

- 86 m diesel-electric Platform Supply Vessel diesel- Wartsila Low Loss Concept (LLC) - 4 x 1580 kWe installed power - DP2 with ERN (99,99,99,99)
13 Wrtsil

Environmental Regularity Number (ERN)

A method developed by DNV to rate a vessels station keeping capability during Dynamic Positioning Consist of four numbers ranging the probable regularity for keeping position in a defined area Format : ERN (a,b,c,d)
a: Optimal use of all thrusters b: Minimum effect of a single thruster failure c: Maximum effect of a single thruster failure d: The effect of the worst case single failure

Highest possible ERN rating: (99,99,99,99)

14

Wrtsil

Wrtsil Low Loss Concept (LLC)

Main switchboard Main propulsion

Electrical motor

Bow thrusters

Variable speed drives

Main generators

Electrical motor

Main propulsion

Reduced electric losses Higher redundancy

15

Wrtsil

Wrtsil LLC Measured Electric Losses

Main switchboard Main propulsion

Electrical motor

Electric propulsion losses 4-7% measured in full scale

Viking Queen

16

Wrtsil

Wrtsil LLC ERN (99,99,99,99)

1580 kWe LLC Unit

1600 kVA Bus A1

G1

1580 kWe

G2

1580 kWe
690V/ 60Hz Bus Link

G3

1580 kWe

G4

LLC Unit
Bus B2 1600 kVA

Bus A2

Bus B1

Worst case single failure

M M

TT Fwd 1

Propulsion PS

Propulsion SB FWD Azimuth

TT Fwd 2

1000kW

2300kW

2300kW

1000kW

880kW

17

Wrtsil

Conventional 2-split system

Worst case single failure
1580 kWe
G1

1580 kWe G2

1580 kWe

G3

1580 kWe G4

ERN (99,99,99,55)
Bus A (port) 690kV / 60Hz Bus B (STBD)

TT FWD 1

1000 KW
PROPULSION PS 2300KW
18 Wrtsil 5 December 2012

AZIMUTH FWD

880 KW PROPULSION SB 2300KW

TT FWD 2 1000KW

Presentation name / Author

ERN (99,99,99,99) with 2-split system

+ 54%
Bus A (Port)

2440 kWe

G1

2440 kWe

G2

2440 kWe

G3

2440 kWe G4

690kV / 60Hz

Bus B (STBD)

+ 110%
TT FWD 1 2100KW Propulsion PS 2100KW
19 Wrtsil

Azimuth FWD 880 KW Propulsion SB 2100KW

+ 110%
TT FWD 2 2100KW

Alternative method - DP Capability Plots

LLC Bus A1 out LLC Fwd tunnel out 2-split Bus A out Wind (knots)

Max wind during DP: - LLC : 35 knots - 2-split : 15 knots

20

Wrtsil

Typical PSV Operation Profile

Operation time
35 %

Installed power LLC: 6320 kWe

19 %

30 %

Total power utilisation

25 %

48 %
20 %

No. of eng. running

15 %

87 %
10 %

22 %

56 %

15 %

5%

5%

4
Steaming, 14,5 knots

2
Steaming, 12 knots

1
Steaming, 10 knots

3
DP rough weather

2
DP good weather

1
Standby

1
Harbour

0%

21

Wrtsil

Comparison of fuel consumption

2- split SWB 9760 kWe Wrtsil LLC 6320 kWe

4000 t/year

3700 t/year (- 9%)

9% fuel saving and reduced emissions caused by:

Reduced electric losses in the Wrtsil LLC More optimum (higher) individual engine loads during operation (gives better fuel efficiency)

22

Wrtsil

Orders with LLC & ERN (99,99,99,99)

VS 485 PSV MK III for Vestland Offshore

VS 485 PSV MK III L for Atlantic Offshore

VS 4412 PSV DF for Remy Shipping

VS 4411 PSV DF for Siem Offshore

23

Wrtsil

Summary

Detailed information about the vessel operation is crucial for green vessel designs meeting demanding operational requirements Use of LNG/Dual Fuel engines will in addition to the reduced emissions, give operational benefits with the inherent redundancy The Wrtsil Low Loss Concept makes it possible to meet the highest ERN rating without increasing installed engine/thruster power:
Significant cost, space and weight savings for the machinery and propulsion system Reduced fuel consumption due to reduced electric losses and better engine utilisation

24

Wrtsil

Thank you for your attention

terje.nordtun@wartsila.com

25

Wrtsil