Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

Name:Amy

Date: _4 March 2013

MYP ASSESSMENT TASK SHEET -- Science

Unit Title

Signiﬁcant Concept

(s)

Unit Question(s)

Scientiﬁc Inquiry

How are individuals unique? How are they similar?

How are pig hearts and human hearts similar? How are they different?

Pig Heart Dissection Lab

What do you have to do?

Follow the correct procedures for dissecting a pig heart. Make comparisons to the human heart.

How will you be assessed?

You will be assessed using Criteria D, E and F.

When is the task due?

We will spend about 3 weeks working on this lab. We should be completely ﬁnished with this work before the end of February.

 Student Self Reﬂection -- Do this part after I have marked your lab What did you learn from this task? I learn ʼ t how to dissect a Pig Heart and how to make a venn diagram What helped you to be successful? By organizing it into paragraphs and diagrams What would you change if you had to do this task again? I would research more on how to dissect a Pig Heart

Teacher Signature and Comment

Parent Signature and Comment

Comments are on Managbac

Martin Amy

Monday, 4 March 2013 12:22:31 PM Hong Kong SAR China Time

Pig Heart Dissection Lab

Martin Amy

Monday, 4 March 2013 12:22:31 PM Hong Kong SAR China Time

Pig Heart Dissection Lab

 Level Descriptors Indicators 0  Has not reached standard of any descriptors below.  Data is mostly organized and presented using simple numerical or diagrammatic forms and draws a conclusion.  My conclusion attempts to discuss my hypothesis. 1-2  I have minimal data/ observations.  Data is organized and transformed into numerical and diagrammatic forms and presented appropriately.  My conclusion discusses my hypothesis. Criterion E: 3-4  My conclusion explains why my hypothesis is correct or not. processing  Conclusion is consistent with the data.  My data/observations are clear and organized. data  Data is organized and transformed 5-6 into numerical and diagrammatic forms and presented appropriately.  Trends, patterns or relationships are explained including at least one comment on reliability.  Conclusions are based on reasonable interpretation of data.  My conclusion specifically discusses my hypothesis.  My conclusion fully and appropriately explains why my hypothesis is correct or not.  My data/observations are very clear and organized.  I have discussed at least one thing I might do differently for our next lab. What level do you think you should get? STUDENT COMMENTS: Although I got everything done I thought I could do better 5 TEACHER COMMENTS:

Martin Amy

Monday, 4 March 2013 12:22:31 PM Hong Kong SAR China Time

Pig Heart Dissection Lab

 Level Descriptors Indicators 0 • Has not reached standard of any descriptors below. • Guidance and supervision is required while using equipment.  I have needed reminders about how to work effectively and respectfully with my lab group. 1-2 • Needs reminders to work cooperatively and safely.  I have needed reminders about working safely and responsibly in the lab.  I have needed frequent teacher guidance.  Requires frequent guidance with equipment  I have usually worked effectively and respectfully with my lab group.  I have usually worked safely and responsibly in the lab. Criterion F: attitudes in science 3-4  Usually pays attention to safety and works responsibly.  Generally cooperates with others.  I have needed some teacher guidance.  Occasionally works independently with precision and skill.  I have consistently worked effectively and respectfully with my lab group.  I have consistently worked safely and responsibly in the lab. 5-6  Pays close attention to safety and works responsibly.  Consistently works as an effective and respectful team member.  I have needed very little teacher guidance. What level do you think you should get? STUDEN T COMMENTS: Although I worked sa fely with my group I needed help from a t eacher 5 TEACHER COMMENTS:

Martin Amy

Monday, 4 March 2013 12:22:31 PM Hong Kong SAR China Time