Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

Name:Amy

Date: _4 March 2013

MYP ASSESSMENT TASK SHEET -- Science

Unit Title

Significant Concept

(s)

Unit Question(s)

Assessment Task

Scientific Inquiry

How are individuals unique? How are they similar?

How are pig hearts and human hearts similar? How are they different?

Pig Heart Dissection Lab

Teacher Task Overview

What do you have to do?

Follow the correct procedures for dissecting a pig heart. Make comparisons to the human heart.

How will you be assessed?

You will be assessed using Criteria D, E and F.

When is the task due?

We will spend about 3 weeks working on this lab. We should be completely finished with this work before the end of February.

Student Self Reflection -- Do this part after I have marked your lab

What did you learn from this task?

I

learn ʼ t how to dissect a Pig Heart and how to make a venn

diagram

What helped you to be successful?

 

By organizing it into paragraphs and diagrams

What would you change if you had to do this task again?

I

would research more on how to dissect a Pig Heart

Teacher Signature and Comment

Parent Signature and Comment

Comments are on Managbac

Martin Amy

Monday, 4 March 2013 12:22:31 PM Hong Kong SAR China Time

Pig Heart Dissection Lab

 

Level

Descriptors

Indicators

 

0

Has not reached standard of any descriptors below.

 
   

I have a hypothesis

1-2

Attempts to recognize the purpose of investigation but makes

incomplete or underdeveloped reference to variables.

Suggested method is partially complete.

Evaluation of method is absent or incomplete.

My hypothesis is not linked to my question.

I have not discussed any of the questions for paragraph 3.

I have not attempted to discuss any difficulties I had or that my group had.

 

Purpose of investigation is recognized but provides an underdeveloped explanation/prediction.

I have a hypothesis using “If…then …because”

Criterion D:

Acknowledges some variables and attempts to describe how to manipulate them.

Method suggested is partially complete and, with guidance, includes appropriate materials/equipment.

Evaluation is partially developed.

Scientific

Inquiry

3-4

My hypothesis is somewhat linked to my question.

I have attempted to discuss 2 of the questions for paragraph 3.

I have attempted to discuss difficulties I had or that my group had.

 

Purpose of investigation is recognized and an attempt was made to articulate the research question.

I have an appropriate hypothesis using “If…then …because”

A simple hypothesis is formed and explained using scientific reasoning.

My hypothesis is appropriately linked to my question.

5-6

Relevant variables are identified along with attempted explanations of how to manipulate them.

With guidance, comments are made regarding reliability or validity of methods.

I have thoroughly discussed at least 2 of the questions for paragraph 3.

I have clearly discussed any difficulties I had or that my group had.

What level do you think you should get?

STUDENT COMMENTS: I didn’t think I got it all done but I thought I did my best

5-6

TEACHER COMMENTS:

 

Martin Amy

Monday, 4 March 2013 12:22:31 PM Hong Kong SAR China Time

Pig Heart Dissection Lab

 

Level

Descriptors

Indicators

 

0

Has not reached standard of any descriptors below.

 
 

Data is mostly organized and presented using simple numerical or diagrammatic forms and draws a conclusion.

My conclusion attempts to discuss my hypothesis.

1-2

I have minimal data/ observations.

 

Data is organized and transformed into numerical and diagrammatic forms and presented appropriately.

My conclusion discusses my hypothesis.

Criterion E:

3-4

My conclusion explains why my hypothesis is correct or not.

processing

Conclusion is consistent with the data.

My data/observations are clear and organized.

data

 

Data is organized and transformed

 

5-6

into numerical and diagrammatic forms and presented appropriately.

Trends, patterns or relationships are explained

including at least one comment on reliability.

Conclusions are based on reasonable interpretation of data.

My conclusion specifically discusses my hypothesis.

My conclusion fully and appropriately explains why my hypothesis is correct or not.

My data/observations are very clear and organized.

I have discussed at least one thing I might do differently for our next lab.

What level do you think you should get?

STUDENT COMMENTS: Although I got everything done I thought I could do better

5

TEACHER COMMENTS:

 

Martin Amy

Monday, 4 March 2013 12:22:31 PM Hong Kong SAR China Time

Pig Heart Dissection Lab

 

Level

Descriptors

Indicators

 

0

Has not reached standard of any descriptors below.

 
 

Guidance and supervision is required while using equipment.

I have needed reminders about how to work effectively and respectfully with my lab group.

1-2

Needs reminders to work cooperatively and safely.

I have needed reminders about working safely and responsibly in the lab.

I have needed frequent teacher guidance.

 

Requires frequent guidance with equipment

I have usually worked effectively and respectfully with my lab group.

I have usually worked safely and responsibly in the lab.

Criterion F:

attitudes in

science

3-4

Usually pays attention to safety and works responsibly.

Generally cooperates with others.

I have needed some teacher guidance.

 

Occasionally works independently with precision and skill.

I have consistently worked effectively and respectfully with my lab group.

I have consistently worked safely and responsibly in the lab.

5-6

Pays close attention to safety and works responsibly.

Consistently works as an effective and respectful team member.

I have needed very little teacher guidance.

What level do you think you should get?

STUDEN T COMMENTS: Although I worked sa fely with my group I needed help from a t eacher

5

TEACHER COMMENTS:

 

Martin Amy

Monday, 4 March 2013 12:22:31 PM Hong Kong SAR China Time