Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
March 4, 2013
MRF
Performance Highlights
Y/E Sept. (` cr) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA margin (%) Reported PAT 1QSY2013 1QSY2012 3,026 403 13.3 180 2,875 258 9.0 113 % chg (yoy) 4QSY2012 5.2 56.5 437bp 59.6 2,994 350 11.7 165 % chg (qoq) 1.1 15.0 161bp 9.4
BUY
CMP Target Price
Investment Period
Stock Info Sector Market Cap (` cr) Net Debt (` cr) Beta 52 Week High / Low Avg. Daily Volume Face Value (Rs) BSE Sensex Nifty Reuters Code Bloomberg Code Tyres 4,905 1,146 0.9 13850/9453 2,994 10 18,878 5,699 MRF.BO MRF IN
`11,565 `14,331
12 Months
For 1QSY2013, MRF reported a muted 5.2% yoy revenue growth to `3,026cr (`2,875cr in 1QSY2012) on account of slowdown in auto industry. Declining rubber prices led to a 437bp yoy expansion of EBITDA margin to 13.3% from 9.0% in the same quarter last year. Consequently, the net profit for the quarter surged by 59.6% yoy to `180cr from `113cr in 1QSY2012. Declining rubber prices to drive bottom-line: Rubber, a major raw material in the manufacture if tyres have been volatile since two years. Rubber prices have declined to level of `157/kg currently due to declining demand owing to slowdown in auto industry; increased production during the last three months; and inventory pileup which resulted from huge imports in times of favorable international prices. Rubber prices are expected to remain relatively low for the next one or two quarters owing to bearish global scenario which would subsequently result in expansion of EBITDA margin and consequently improved net profit. We expect the EBITDA margin to remain relatively unchanged in SY2014E due to expected pass on of price correction in the OEM segment. Outlook and valuation: We expect MRF to post a 7.7% revenue CAGR over SY2012-14 to `13,767cr, while EBITDA margin is expected to expand by 229bp in SY2013 due to decline in rubber prices. However, we expect margin to remain stable in SY2014 at 12.8%. Consequently, the net profit is expected to post a 15.2% CAGR over SY2012-14 to `760cr. At the current market price, MRF is trading at a PE of 6.5x its SY2014E earnings and at a P/BV of 1.1x for SY2014E. We maintain our Buy rating on the stock with a revised target price of `14,331, based on a target P/E of 8.0x for SY2014E earnings.
Shareholding Pattern (%) Promoters MF / Banks / Indian Fls FII / NRIs / OCBs Indian Public / Others 27.2 10.5 30.8 32.1
3m (2.2) 6.1
Key financials
Y/E Sept. (` cr) Net Sales % chg Adj. Net Profit % chg EBITDA (%) EPS (`) P/E (x) P/BV (x) RoE (%) RoIC (%) EV/Sales (x) EV/EBITDA (x) SY2011 9,743 30.7 343 0.9 8.3 808 14.3 2.1 17.2 18.9 0.6 7.6 SY2012 11,870 21.8 572 67.0 10.6 1,350 8.6 1.7 22.2 23.3 0.5 4.8 SY2013E 12,422 4.7 704 23.0 12.9 1,661 7.0 1.4 22.0 23.3 0.5 4.0 SY2014E 13,767 10.8 760 7.9 12.8 1,791 6.5 1.1 19.4 21.7 0.5 3.5
Shareen Batatawala
+91- 22- 3935 7800 Ext: 6849 shareen.batatawala@angelbroking.com
1QSY13 3,026 2,024 66.9 134 4.4 465 15.4 2,623 403 13.3 50 89 3 267 8.8 87 32.5 180 6.0 180 4 425
1QSY12 2,875 2,110 73.4 118 4.1 390 13.6 2,618 258 9.0 32 65 4 165 5.7 52 31.5 113 3.9 113 4 266
yoy chg (%) 5.2 (4.1) 13.9 19.0 0.2 56.5 437bp
4QSY12 2,994 2,053 68.6 133 4.4 458 15.3 2,643 350 11.7 45 87 19
qoq chg (%) 1.1 (1.4) 1.3 1.5 (0.8) 15.0 161bp
SY12 11,870 8,353 70.4 514 4.3 1,743 14.7 10,609 1,261 10.6 159 301 32
SY11 9,743 7,107 72.9 447 4.6 1,385 14.2 8,938 805 8.3 93 248 25 489 5.0 274 56.0 404.2 619 6.4 343 4 1,461
61.9 66.9
12.2 18.6
70.2 (4.9)
March 4, 2013
Investment rationale
Declining rubber prices to drive short term profits
Rubber prices have been volatile during the last two years. Since rubber constitutes a major proportion to the raw material cost, volatility in its price has impacted the profitability of tyre companies. Rubber prices have currently declined due to a number of reasons. Slowdown in production in the automobile segment has been one of the major reasons for fall in demand of rubber. Moreover, import of natural rubber through duty free channels accounted for 46% of the total during Apr- Dec 2012 due of favorable international price. This led to piling up of inventory at projected levels of 2,90,000 tonnes, thus resulting in a decline in domestic rubber price. According to an International Rubber Study Group (IRSG) report, global production in the April-December 2012 period rose 3.2%, while consumption fell by 1.1%. IRSG estimates 2012 global production and consumption of natural rubber at 11.41 and 10.95 million tonnes, respectively, with a surplus of 4,60,000 tonnes. While in 2013, production and consumption is expected to be at 11.77 and 11.59 million tonnes, respectively, with a surplus of 1,79,000 tonnes. With onset of dry season in Thailand (world's biggest rubber producer) in which the rubber supply reduces by 50% is expected to result in increase in price. However, this rise would be offset by the Thai Govt.s decision to discontinue its rubber buying scheme; thus leading to relatively stable international rubber price. In addition, Thailand decision to join key exporters- Indonesia and Malaysia, to restrict shipments led to increase in international rubber prices in past three months and consequently would lower rubber imports. However, considering the overall bearish trend in the global market, prices are expected to remain relatively low for next one or two quarters.
(`/kg)
Feb-12
Oct-12
May-12
Nov-12
Dec-12
Mar-12
Aug-12
Feb-13
Sep-12
Jan-12
Jun-12
Apr-12
Jan-13
Jul-12
International Price
Source: Rubber Board, Angel Research
Domestic Price
Tyre companies have taken substantial price hikes during FY2012. The decline in the price of rubber will further benefit them in the short term. However, in the long term we expect the EBITDA margin to remain unchanged owing to pass on of price correction in the OEM segment.
March 4, 2013
Mar-13
Financials
Exhibit 4: Key assumptions
SY2013E Change in tyre realization (%) Change in tyre volume sales (%) Change in rubber price (%)
Source: Angel Research
1.0 (8.0)
March 4, 2013
(` cr)
8,000 6,000
15 10.8 10
11,870
12,422
13,767
5,664
7,453
9,743
4,000 2,000 0
4.7
5 0
SY2009
SY2010
SY2011
SY2012
SY2013E
SY2014E
Revenue (LHS)
Source: Company, Angel Research
(` cr)
(` cr)
(%)
300 200
3.5
3.5 3.0
1,261
1,605
682
809
805
1,767
249
340
343
572
704
760
400 200 0
8 7 6
100 0
2.5 2.0
SY2009
SY2010
SY2011
SY2012
SY2013E
SY2014E
SY2009
SY2010
SY2011
SY2012
SY2013E
SY2014E
EBITDA (LHS)
PAT (LHS)
March 4, 2013
(%)
10
400
4.0
(%)
20
(`)
12,000 9,000 6,000 3,000 0 Mar-08 Mar-09 Price Mar-10 2x 5x Mar-11 8x Mar-12 11x Mar-13
FY2014E SY2014E
March 4, 2013
Risks
Volatile rubber prices: Natural rubber is the major raw material used in the manufacture of tyres. Rubber prices were at a high of `243/kg in April 2011; however, prices have now fallen to a low of `157/kg (in February 2013). Increased volatility in rubber prices would have a direct impact on the companys EBITDA margin and consequently its profit.
(`/ kg)
Dec-11
Mar-11
Mar-12
Dec-12
Company Background
MRF manufactures rubber products such as tyres, tubes, flaps, tread rubber and conveyor belts. The company is present across all categories of tyres, with an installed capacity of 3.2cr tyres. MRF is a market leader in the tyre industry with an ~27% market share currently. The company is also a leader in the passenger car tyre segment with a 23.9% market share and holds a third position in the MHCV segment with a 21.4% market share. MRF also exports tyres to over 65 countries in America, Europe, Middle East, Japan and the Pacific region.
March 4, 2013
Mar-13
Sep-11
Sep-12
Jun-11
Jun-12
March 4, 2013
March 4, 2013
March 4, 2013
10
Key Ratios
Y/E Sept. Valuation Ratio (x) P/E (on FDEPS) P/CEPS P/BV Dividend yield (%) EV/Sales EV/EBITDA EV / Total Assets Per Share Data (`) EPS (Basic) EPS (fully diluted) Cash EPS DPS Book Value Dupont Analysis EBIT margin Tax retention ratio Asset turnover (x) ROIC (Post-tax) Cost of Debt (Post Tax) Leverage (x) Operating ROE Returns (%) ROCE (Pre-tax) Angel ROIC (Pre-tax) ROE Turnover ratios (x) Asset Turnover Inventory / Sales (days) Receivables (days) Payables (days) WC (ex-cash) (days) Solvency ratios (x) Net debt to equity Net debt to EBITDA Interest Coverage 0.7 1.5 8.7 0.5 1.5 6.0 0.4 0.9 6.0 0.4 0.9 5.9 0.3 0.8 6.7 2.4 43 34 47 41 2.7 49 40 54 45 2.7 49 37 54 48 2.1 48 38 54 49 2.0 46 38 54 43 21.7 27.8 22.3 14.5 18.9 17.2 18.6 23.3 22.2 19.6 23.3 22.0 18.3 21.7 19.4 7.4 0.7 3.1 14.8 4.1 0.7 22.6 5.7 0.7 2.8 11.0 4.7 0.5 14.4 8.1 0.7 2.5 13.8 7.3 0.4 16.5 9.8 0.7 2.2 14.5 7.8 0.4 17.3 9.5 0.7 2.2 13.8 6.9 0.3 16.1 801.2 801.2 1,416.1 58.3 3,987 808.4 808.4 1,392.4 29.1 5,419 1,349.9 1,349.9 2,060.1 25.0 6,740 1,661.0 1,661.0 2,576.8 30.0 8,371 1,791.4 1,791.4 2,888.5 30.0 10,133 14.4 8.2 2.9 0.5 0.8 7.6 2.0 14.3 8.3 2.1 0.3 0.6 7.6 1.3 8.6 5.6 1.7 0.3 0.5 4.8 1.1 7.0 4.5 1.4 0.3 0.5 4.0 0.9 6.5 4.0 1.1 0.3 0.5 3.5 0.8 SY2010 SY2011 SY2012 SY2013E SY2014E
March 4, 2013
11
E-mail: research@angelbroking.com
Website: www.angelbroking.com
DISCLAIMER
This document is solely for the personal information of the recipient, and must not be singularly used as the basis of any investment decision. Nothing in this document should be construed as investment or financial advice. Each recipient of this document should make such investigations as they deem necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in the securities of the companies referred to in this document (including the merits and risks involved), and should consult their own advisors to determine the merits and risks of such an investment. Angel Broking Limited, its affiliates, directors, its proprietary trading and investment businesses may, from time to time, make investment decisions that are inconsistent with or contradictory to the recommendations expressed herein. The views contained in this document are those of the analyst, and the company may or may not subscribe to all the views expressed within. Reports based on technical and derivative analysis center on studying charts of a stock's price movement, outstanding positions and trading volume, as opposed to focusing on a company's fundamentals and, as such, may not match with a report on a company's fundamentals. The information in this document has been printed on the basis of publicly available information, internal data and other reliable sources believed to be true, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete and it should not be relied on as such, as this document is for general guidance only. Angel Broking Limited or any of its affiliates/ group companies shall not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this report. Angel Broking Limited has not independently verified all the information contained within this document. Accordingly, we cannot testify, nor make any representation or warranty, express or implied, to the accuracy, contents or data contained within this document. While Angel Broking Limited endeavours to update on a reasonable basis the information discussed in this material, there may be regulatory, compliance, or other reasons that prevent us from doing so. This document is being supplied to you solely for your information, and its contents, information or data may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly. Angel Broking Limited and its affiliates may seek to provide or have engaged in providing corporate finance, investment banking or other advisory services in a merger or specific transaction to the companies referred to in this report, as on the date of this report or in the past. Neither Angel Broking Limited, nor its directors, employees or affiliates shall be liable for any loss or damage that may arise from or in connection with the use of this information. Note: Please refer to the important `Stock Holding Disclosure' report on the Angel website (Research Section). Also, please refer to the latest update on respective stocks for the disclosure status in respect of those stocks. Angel Broking Limited and its affiliates may have investment positions in the stocks recommended in this report.
Disclosure of Interest Statement 1. Analyst ownership of the stock 2. Angel and its Group companies ownership of the stock 3. Angel and its Group companies' Directors ownership of the stock 4. Broking relationship with company covered
MRF No No No No
Note: We have not considered any Exposure below ` 1 lakh for Angel, its Group companies and Directors
Ratings (Returns):
March 4, 2013
12