Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 9

Archived Information

(QG2XWFRPHVIRU*RDOVDQG

Congress appropriated approximately $42 billion in fiscal year 2000 for various program activities
administered by the Department of Education. Expenditures for these program activities represented about
2 percent of the federal government’s annual $1.8 trillion budget. Combining EDs expenditures with
funding from all other federal agencies, the government contributes approximately 9 percent of total
national expenditures on education; the remaining 91 percent comes from state, local, and private sources.
More than half of the Department’s budget supported elementary and secondary education. In addition to
the many programs, the Department administers tax expenditures targeted for education benefits that also
significantly support the objectives of the Department’s Strategic Plan.

To measure the use of these resources, EDs Strategic Plan sets forth 7 performance indicators for
elementary and secondary education. These indicators summarize the Nation’s education progress across
the wide variety of departmental programs and provide a picture of the state of U.S. elementary education
as a whole.

Progress toward the 7 key outcome indicators is influenced by Federal programs and activities taking place
under Goals 1 and 2 of the Strategic Plan:

ƒ Goal 1. Help all students reach challenging academic standards so that they are prepared for
responsible citizenship, further learning, and productive employment.
ƒ Goal 2. Build a solid foundation for the learning of all children.

The outcomes measured by these 7 indicators cannot be achieved by the Federal government al1 but
constitute the shared responsibility of states, districts, schools, parents, communities, and society at large.
The strategies described in Goals 1 and 2 show how we can work together with our non-federal partners to
focus on results, minimize administrative burden, and use resources to the fullest to maximize student
learning.

End Outcomes Page 7


Indicator A. Increasing percentages of all students will meet or exceed basic,
proficient, and advanced performance levels in national and state assessments
of reading, math, and other core subjects.
Assessment of Progress. No new data. 2000 data for math are due in 2001. The percentage of 4th and
12th grade students performing at or above the basic level in reading has been stable since 1992. The
small decline at the 12th grade level is not statistically significant. Eighth graders’ reading performance has
improved. Math performance improved substantially for students in all 3 grades (4, 8, and 12) from 1990
to 1996.
Figure A.1
Performance of Students on NAEP Assessment
(Percentage of Students Scoring At or Above NAEP Basic Level) Source: National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
and the National Center for Education Statistics. Frequency:
Every 4 years, alternating math and reading. Next Update:
*UDGH  Reading Math Math 2000 data are due in 2001. Validation procedure: Data
100% verified and validated by the National Center for Education
P e r c e n ta g e o f S tu d e n ts

Statistics and the National Assessment Governing Board.


80% 70%
62% 60% 62% 66%
59%
64% Limitations of data and planned improvements: Reading
60%
* 50% * data for 1990 are omitted because they are not comparable
2 2 with those of later years.
$
40%
$
20%
/ /
0%
1992 1994 1998 2002 1990 1992 1996 2000
*UDGH  Year Year
100%
P e r c e n ta g e o f S tu d e n ts

79%
80% 74%
69% 70% 70%
62%
60% * 52%
58%
*
2 2
40% $ $
20%
/ /
0%
1992 1994 1998 2002 1990 1992 1996 2000
*UDGH  Year Year
10 0 %
P e rce nta ge o f S tu d e n ts

85 %
80 % 77 %
75 % 74 %
80 % 69 %
64 %
60 % * 58 %
*
2 2
40 %
$ $
20 % / /
0%
19 9 2 19 9 4 19 9 8 20 0 2 19 9 0 19 9 2 19 9 6 20 0 0
Y e ar Y e ar

Page 8 End Outcomes


Indicator B. Students in high-poverty schools will show continuous
improvement in achieving proficiency levels comparable to those for the
Nation.
Assessment of Progress. No new data; 1999 data for reading and math are due in fall 2000.

Reading. While students in low-poverty schools improved their reading scores from 1988 to 1996, scores
of students in high-poverty schools only began improving in 1992. From 1992 to 1996, scores of 9-year-
olds in high-poverty schools rose by 8 scale score points, or close to a grade level of improvement.

Low-poverty schools are defined as those in which fewer than 25 percent of the students are eligible for
free or reduced-price lunches. High-poverty schools are defined as those in which more than 75 percent of
the students are eligible for free or reduced-price lunches.

Math. Improvement in mathematics has occurred most appreciably for students in high-poverty schools
since 1992, rising by 9 points, or about 1 grade level.

Figure B.1 Figure B.2

Trends in NAEP Reading Performance Average Trends in NAEP Mathematics Performance


Scale Scores of 9-year old Public School Students Average Scale Scores of 9-Year-Old Public School
by Poverty Level of School (1999-1996) Students by Poverty Level of School (1986 to 1996)
260
260
GOAL:
N AE P M ean Sca le Score

Continuous
N AE P m ean scale score

2 37 2 36 2 39 2 38
240
Increase 240
22 5 2 28
22 1 22 0 22 0
21 7 2 30 2 28 2 29 2 30
220
220 2 19

21 1 2 15 2 17
200 20 9 20 9 20 9 21 0 2 13 Goal:
200 2 08 2 08
Continuous
Increase
180 19 0 18 9 18 8 180
18 4
18 0
0
160
1 600
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1999 2000 2001 2003 1986 1990 1992 1994 1996 2003

Y ear Y ear

L o w-P o v e rty S c h o o ls Hig h -P o v e rty S c h o o ls A ll S c h o o ls L o w -P o verty S ch o o ls H ig h -P o verty S ch o o ls A ll S ch o o ls

Note: Low poverty schools are schools with 0-25% of students eligible for free or reduced price lunches, and high poverty schools are schools with
76 to 100% of students eligible for free or reduced price lunches.

Source: Special analyses of data from National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and the National Center for Education Statistics.
Frequency: Biennial from 1988 to 1996, decreasing to once every 4 years by 2003. Next Update: 1999 data for reading and math are due in fall
2000. The next update for both reading and math data will be in 2003, with the data becoming available in fall 2004. Validation procedure:
Based on special analyses of NAEP reading and mathematics trend data. NAEP is reviewed according to NCES Statistical Standards. Limitations
of data and planned improvements: Data on the percentage of students eligible for free and reduced-price lunches are not available for some
schools, and definitions vary somewhat across years.

Indicator C. The proportion of high school graduates who complete at least 3


years of science and 3 years of math will increase 10 percent between 1994 and
1998.
Assessment of Progress. No new data; 1998 data are due in summer 2000. In 1994, 60 percent of all
high school graduates had completed 3 years of mathematics and 3 years of science. In addition to the

End Outcomes Page 9


number of years of coursework, the level of difficulty of the courses students complete is also important.
The percentage of students completing various courses in mathematics and science increased from 1990 to
1994 for all courses offered, including more challenging courses such as calculus and physics.

Page 10 End Outcomes


Figure C.1 Figure C.2
Percentage of High School Graduates Who Have Percentage of High School Graduates Taking Selected
Taken 3 Years of Math and 3 Years of Science Mathematics and Science Courses in High School:
100%
1990 to 2000
Mathematics
Percent of Graduates

80%
70%
63% 1990
6 0% GOAL: 70%
1998 Data *HRPHWU\
Continuous
60%
to be 75% 1994
Increase
released 52%
Summer 59% 1 9 9 8 (G O A L )
2000 $OJHEUD ,,
40%
64%
18%
7ULJRQRPHWU\ 17% GOAL:
20%
22% Continuous
13% Increases
$QDO\VLV 17%
0%
3UH&DOFXOXV 22%
1994 1998 2000
7%
Y ear 9%
&DOFXOXV
14%

0% 50% 100%
Source: Based on 1994 High School Transcript Study and
other surveys, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
Frequency: These data are available only once every 4 years, Science
and the 1998 data are due in summer 2000. Next Update: 1998 1 990
91%
data are due in summer 2000. Validation procedure: Special %LRORJ\ 94% 1 994
tabulations produced for and reviewed by the National Center 99% 1 998 (G O A L )
for Education Statistics, according to the NCES Statistical 49%
&KHPLVWU\ 56%
Standards. Limitations of data and planned improvements: 61%
These data are collected only once every 4 years; 1998 data will 22%
3K\VLFV
be available in Summer 2000. 24%
29% GOAL:
%LRORJ\ DQG 48% Continuous
&KHPLVWU\ 54% Increases
59%
%LRORJ\
19%
&KHPLVWU\
21%
DQG 3K\VLFV 26%

0% 50% 100%

Indicator D. Increasing numbers of high school students will successfully


complete Advanced Placement Program courses each year.
Assessment of Progress. Since 1990, an increasing proportion of 11th and 12th grade students have
been taking Advanced Placement (AP) Program courses, and an increasing number have passed at the
level necessary to receive postsecondary credit. In 1999, 165 AP tests were administered per 1,000
students, and 105 of those tests resulted in postsecondary credit. This trend toward increased AP course-
taking began in 1984 and has occurred among both sexes and all racial/ethnic groups.

End Outcomes Page 11


Figure D.1

Number of Advanced Placement (AP) Tests Administered Source: Based on special analyses of data from the College Board AP
Earning the Needed Score to Receive College Credit per Program, prepared for and reviewed by the National Center for Education
1,000 11th and 12th Grade Students, 1994 to 1999 Statistics. Frequency: Annual. Next update: 2000 data due in 2001.
Validation procedure: Special analyses prepared for and reviewed by the
20 0 National Center for Education Statistics according to NCES Statistical
Standards. Data supplied by the College Board. Limitations of data and
Number per 1,000

16 0
planned improvements: Because AP candidates often take more than 1
students

12 0
examination, there is not a 1-to-1 ratio between the number of examinations
80 taken and the number of students.
GOALS
40

0
19 94 19 95 19 96 19 97 19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01

Year

Nu m b e r o f A P T ests A dm in istered

Nu m b e r o f Te sts E a rn in g C olle ge C red it

Indicator E. Students in high-poverty schools will complete comparable


amounts of challenging coursework – including Advanced Placement courses –
which will enable them to pursue higher education or other options.
Assessment of Progress. No new data; unable to judge as the 1998 data will be available in summer
2000. As preparation for postsecondary study, students are encouraged to complete 3 years of mathematics
and 3 years of science. In 1994, there was only a small gap between the percentage of all graduates and
the percentage of graduates of high-poverty schools who had taken this coursework.

While the number of years of mathematics is important, the rigor of the coursework is also important (see
Indicator C.2 in this series). Research shows that schools with a large proportion of high-poverty students
are less likely to offer advanced courses than schools in which students come from affluent families.

Figure E.1

Source: Based on special analyses of data from the NAEP Transcript


Percentage of High School Graduates who have taken
Study, prepared for the National Center for Education Statistics.
3 or more Years of Math and 3 or more Years of Science, Frequency: Every 4 years. Next Update: 1998 data due in summer 2000.
for all High Schools and High Poverty Schools, 1994 and Validation procedure: Special analyses prepared for the National
100%
1998 (Goal) Center for Education Statistics and reviewed according to NCES
Statistical Standards. Limitations of data and planned improvements:
Percent of Graduates

80% 70% Data collected only once every 4 to 6 years. Next data to be collected in
65%
60% 56% 2000.
60%
GOALS:
Continuous
40% Improvement

20%

0%
1994 1998 2002
Year
All High School Graduates Graduates from High-Poverty Schools

Page 12 End Outcomes


Indicator F. High school attendance and graduation rates will continually
improve—particularly in high-poverty schools and among students with
disabilities and others at risk of school failure.
Assessment of Progress. No new data; the 1999 data will be released in fall 2000. Between 1990 and
1998, the percentage of students who dropped out of high school increased slightly for all students and for
students from low-income families. There are many ways to calculate dropout rates. The rate used in this
indicator is the event dropout rate, which is the most sensitive to year-to-year changes in the percentage of
students who leave school before graduating. The event dropout rate is defined as the percentage of 15-to-
24-year-olds who were enrolled in high school 1 year but had not completed high school and were not
enrolled in grades 10–12 in October a year later.

Figure F.1 Figure F.2


Recent School Dropouts, by Family Income, Recent School Dropouts, by Ethnicity, 1988-1998
15 %
1988-1998 (Event Dropout Rates) (Event Dropout Rates)
15%
12 .1% 12 .5% 12 .0%
11 .6%
11 .1% GOALS:
10 .3%
1 0 .5 % Continuous
Percentage of Students

10 %
Percentage of Students
Decrease
GOALS: 10% 9 .2 % 9 .3 %
8 .7 % 8 .3 %
Continuous 7 .8 %
Decrease
6 .2 % 6 .6 %
5.3 % 5 .9 % 5 .8 % 5 .6 %
4.8 % 5.0 % 4.8 % 5 .3 %
5% 4.4 %
4.0 % 5% 4 .3 %
3 .8 % 3 .7 % 3 .9 % 3 .9 %
3 .4 %
2.1 % 2.2 %
1.3 % 1.6 %
1.2 % 1.1 %

0% 0%
19 88 19 89 19 90 19 91 19 92 19 93 19 94 19 95 19 96 19 97 19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Y ear Y ea r
W h ite n o n -His p a nic B la c k His p a n ic
Lo w-Inc om e All Stu den ts High-inco m e
Enrollment rates for the income groups are based on three-year weighted averages with the Enrollment rates for the ethnic groups are based on three-year
listed year being the last year in the series. weighted averages with the listed year being the last year in the series.

Source: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), Dropout Rates in the United States 1998, based on data from U.S. Department of
Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Current Population Survey, October (various years). Frequency: Annual. Next Update: 1999 data due in fall
2000. Validation procedure: Data published by NCES and reviewed according to NCES Statistical Standards. Based on U.S. Department of
Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Limitations of data and planned improvements: Dropout data for subgroups of students fluctuate
considerably from year to year because of small sample sizes.

End Outcomes Page 13


Indicator G. Increasing percentages of high school graduates will successfully
transition into postsecondary education or employment.
Assessment of Progress. No new data; the 1999 data will be released in fall 2000. The percentage of
graduates who are enrolled in postsecondary studies the October following graduation has risen steadily
since the early 1990s. The percentage of graduates not in postsecondary studies who are employed has
been fairly stable since the early 1990s.

Figure G.1 Figure G.2


Transition to College: 1981 to 1999 Transition from High School to Work: 1980 to 1999
Percentage of High School Graduates Aged 16-24 Who Were Recent High School Graduates Not in College - Percent Employed
Enrolled in College the October Following Graduation
100% 100%

75%
80% 75% 80% 72% 71%
Percentage of Graduates

69%

Percentage Employed
71% 68% 67%
67% 64% 65% 63% 64% 63%
63% 62% 62% 60% 59%
58% 60%
57% 60%
60% 54% 53% GOAL:
2%
Improvement
GOALS: each year
2% 40%
40%
Improvement
each year
20%
20%

0%
0% '80 '82 '84 '86 '88 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '99 '00 '01
'8 1 '8 3 '8 5 '8 7 '8 9 '9 1 '9 3 '9 5 '9 7 '9 9 '0 0 '0 1
Ye ar Year

Source: Based on special analyses of Census Bureau data and the October Current Population Surveys prepared for the National Center for
Education Statistics. Frequency: Annual. Next Update: 1999 data due in 2000. Validation procedures: Data provided by the National Center for
Education Statistics and reviewed according to NCES Statistical Standards. Limitations of data and planned improvements: None.

Page 14 End Outcomes


End Outcomes Page 15

Вам также может понравиться