Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
•Waste and inefficiency had undermined taxpayer confidence and reduced the
government's ability to meet public needs
•Inadequate goals and performance data impeded managers’ efforts to make
programs work
•Congress needed performance information
•Reduce gaps in college access and completion among different student populations
while increasing educational attainment
•Strengthen accountability of postsecondary education institutions
•Strengthen minority-serving institutions
•Establish effective funding mechanisms
•Enhance literacy and employment skills of U.S. adults
•Increase the capacity of institutions to teach world languages, area studies, and
international issues
•Over the past 10 years, GPRA results show steady, but uneven, progress
•4 years ago, OMB developed the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) to
systematically assess programs across federal agencies
The Program Assessment Rating Tool evaluates program performance in four main
areas:
–Program Purpose and Design
–Strategic Planning
–Program Management
–Program Results and Accountability
200
161 45-64%
150 65-69%
70-74%
92 92 75-79%
100 80-84%
85-89%
43 90-94%
50 23
10 95-100%
0
Percent successful outcomes
Slide 26: Analyzing Data from Multiple Sources
$4,000
Cost/Successful Outcome
$3,500
$3,000
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$0
40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110%
Successful outcome rate
Slide 27: Analyzing Data from Multiple Sources by Multiple Categories
$3,500
Cost/Succ. Outcome *
$3,000
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$0
40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110%
No. students served: small No.Successful
students served:Outcome Rate
medium No. of students served: large