Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INDEX Sl # 1 2 3 4 Particulars Introduction Selection of the Alternative Model: Model Type Selected Design methodology in model Page 3 3 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
The underpinning benefit of the transaction based eGovernance model Weaknesses of the existent system in Gyandoot List of Issues that contributed to the failure of Gyandoot Proposed System Benefits Key Business Process and Data requirements Data requirement for the processes Sensitive, Privacy and Security of information Functional and Non-Functional requirements Lo-fidelity prototype Reference:
4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16
Page 1
Introduction: The main crux of eGovernance is captured as expressed by the former President of India Sri A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, In a democratic nation of over one billion people like India, eGovernance should enable seamless access to information and seamless flow of information across state and central government in the federal set up. No country has so far implemented an eGovernance system for one billion people; it is a big challenge for us. [1] The development of the information technology era and its positive impact on the governance is seen in the development of various models of eGovernance across the nations. Since the start of the 20th century various eGovernance models have been proposed by international organisations. a) Selection of the Alternative Model: Gyandoot was implemented in the year 2000 in the rural district of Dhar in Madhya Pradesh. The use of an interactive service model coupled with the available information technology bought about the implementation of Gyandoot. The basic requirements that was met by this eGovernance model was a set of 20 activities that included the issue of birth certificates, death certificates, land records copy, marriage certificates etc. However, the system failed to achieve the desired result of providing Information and Communication technology (ICT) based solution to the poor. After a detailed analysis of the model implemented for Gyandoot and going by the facts of the case, the suggestion for a newer model with more robust activities is proposed. The suggestion is as below:
1. Model Type Selected : The new eGovernance system should be based
on a Transactional model. In the words of Coursey, D, & Norris, D (2008) the eGovernance model proposed by Wescott (2001) which initially emPage 2
2. Design methodology in model : The Transactional model based on Wescotts (2001) model design has 5 steps as seen in the figure 1. The design of the model follows the 6 steps of 1. Step 1: Email and internal network: This step includes the communication between the internal government departments that are on the intranet where the eGovernance model is implemented.
Page 3
3. The underpinning benefit of the transaction based eGovernance model : The transaction based eGovernance model encapsulates all the features of the Service oriented model along with further benefits which increases the scalability of the eGovernance across the time to come. Below are a few salient reasons in selecting this model as an alternative to the Service oriented model of Gyandoot are is: Page 4
of building trust. It effectively realises the opportunity of synergy that is available in the eGovernance model [3].
2. The transactional model fully integrates the with the other government-
ates for Government transparency by way of primary channels which being the active sharing of governmental information, the availability of governmental information on demand and by interacting with the public on an ongoing basis (Piotrowski, 2007) [4].
model offers a marginal benefit to the users and the government. The below picture shows the structural design of a transactional taxpaying system in an eGovernance environment [5]
Page 5
b) Weaknesses of the existent system in Gyandoot: The prevalent Gyandoot system was based on the intranet access from PCs Kiosks that were located at various designated locations in the villages. The Kiosks were service points for 20 different services that were used often. The survey conducted by the CEG-IIMA survey revealed startling results indicating very low usage of the Gyandoot systems. The poor for whom the system was meant contributed to 31 percent of users while the rich people contributed to 77 percent of users. (Cecchini, S, & Raina, M (2004) At many instances, the prevailing prices in the grain market (mandi) was promptly and easily found out by calling the merchant in the city rather than obtaining a report from Gyandoot for Rs.10. There was no stipulated time or scheduled time of opening and closing of the kiosk that led to an erratic approach to the availability to the service. The survey also revealed a strong decline of users from 848 in 2001 to 77 in 2002 revealed the depleting confidence levels in the system. Apart from the above issues, listed below are other issues that contributed to the failure of the system [6]: List of Issues that contributed to the failure of Gyandoot [6] Sl # Weaknesses 1 A digital from end but a paper back end 2 Disadvantages The front end of Gyandoot was a digital one, however the interaction with the back end process was a non-digital paper office thereby erasing all the benefits of Gyandoot It bought about completion across each other, where in the private owners exploited the poor for reports The Gyandoot Samiti was able to harness the opportunities locally, but, due to the hierarchy, it did not have powers to resolve issues at the Page 6
10
11
The Grievance was a paid service and most of the time remained unresolved
Page 7
Source: Cecchini, S, & Raina, M 2004 [6] The process of capturing and processing the transaction is as shown in the fig 4. The process flow captures the general input through output processes of a transaction based eGovernance model.
Page 9
access their data despite being mobile. The user can access the information through a client interface using a web browser.
Page 10
al government organisation to link up with the Gyandoot information and vice versa. This enables a smooth interaction with the other governmental data centres and timely updates. The advantage of community cloud is that is offers effective security to user data.
Fig 5: Showing the cloud architecture to be followed for Gyandoot system Source : http://www.infosys.com/infosys-labs/publications/Documents/egovernance/ict-e-governance.pdf d) Functional and Non-Functional requirements: The functional and non functional requirement are : Functional Requirements: Should provide data synchronization with the central database Support the various requirement of multilingual interface and language requirements Scalability of system should be available to the ensure that new processes can be appended to the existing list
Page 11
Page 12
Sl # Deployment in India The presence of a Soochak is imperative as the population of users is 1 mostly illiterate The use of kiosk is necessary as the village does not permit him/her to own 2 a computer or a mobile internet device The use of multi-lingual language support is imperative as the users of 3 Gyandoot vary in their language skills The power back up system must be robust and function 24 x 7 to ensure that the connectivity is available to the 4 5 user The political clearances at both central and state levels is a must The use of simple language is essential. The use of translators and 6
Deployment in UK The user in UK is mostly literate and majority are equipped with internet access The majority of users in UK have computers or by way of mobile connectivity The use of English is prevalent in UK and therefore with a minimum additional languages, the system can be deployed There is no such power back up issue. The central clearance is sufficient to deploy the system The use of translators and interpreters is not required to a
economic condition of the user from the access to internet through either
interpreters is required to a great extent great extent Data input in local language has to be converted into other languages so as to The input in English is sufficient make it user friendly for other for all departments in UK There is minimum need of publicity. However, advertisements in mobile phones and message alerts can convey the existence of such system Page 13
Governmental department There is a dire need to campaign about the new system using Radio, Television, road shows, visits by school children to ensure that there is
Reference: [1] http://egov.eletsonline.com/2011/12/tryst-with-e-governance/ [2] Coursey, D, & Norris, D 2008, 'Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment', Public Administration Review, 68, 3, pp. 523-536, Business Source Premier, [3] Preparations For UN E-Government Survey 2012' 2011, Journal Of EGovernance, 34, 3, pp. 130-131, Business Source Premier [4] Bertot, J, Jaeger, P, & Grimes, J 2010, 'Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies', Government Information Quarterly, 27, 3, pp. 264-271, Business Source Premier [5] Vassilakis, C., Laskaridis, G., Lepouras, G., Rouvas, S., & Georgiadis, P. (2003). A framework for managing the lifecycle of transactional e-government services. Telematics and Informatics, 20(4), 315-329 [6] Cecchini, S, & Raina, M 2004, 'Electronic Government and the Rural Poor: The Case of Gyandoot', Information Technologies & International Development, 2, 2, pp. 65-75, Business Source Premier [7] Bertot, J, Jaeger, P, & Grimes, J 2010, 'Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies', Government Information Quarterly, 27, 3, pp. 264-271, Business Source Premier,
Page 14
Page 15