Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Florida http://www.flboe.

org
School and Teacher Demographics Student Demographics Statewide Accountability Information



(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)
Per pupil expenditures $6,170 Public school 1993-94 2001-02


Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment


(CCD, 2000-01) enrollment (CCD) Pre-K 34,793 57,038 Under the A+ Plan: For C grade: 60 percent of students at


K-8 1,480,401 1,740,376 Level 2 (FCAT reading, math); Writing: 50 percent at


Number of districts 67
9-12 525,569 703,064


(CCD, 2001-02) Level 3 for elementary, 67 percent for middle school, 75


Total (K-12) 2,005,970 2,443,440 percent for high school.


Number of charter schools
Expected School Improvement on Assessment


(CCD, 2001-02) 187


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Attain grade A/B: increase by 2 percent the number of


Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 2001-02 students at Level 3 (FCAT).


Number of public schools (CCD)


1993-94 2001-02 American Indian/Alaskan Natives * * Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools


Elementary 1,472 1,773 Asian/Pacific Islander 2% 2% Transition: High School: more than 85 percent pass


384 491 Black 25 25 language arts, 80 percent pass math, 67 percent pass


Middle


High 264 409 Hispanic 14 20 writing. Middle School: more than 40 percent over 50th


Combined 218 632 White 60 52 percentile. Elementary school: more than 33 percent over


2,338 3,305 Other — — 50th percentile.


Total


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Schoolwide Targeted Total


Number of FTE teachers (CCD) 1993-94 2001-02 Title I 2001-02 Programs Assistance


1993-94 2001-02 ○
Students with disabilities (OSEP) 12% 13%


(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)
Elementary 55,831 67,664



Middle School 19,248 26,159 ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Number of schools 1,110 110 1,220


High School 20,873 32,386 1993-94 2001-02 91% 9% 100%


Combined 8,507 9,458


Migratory students (OME) 2% 3% Schools meeting AYP goal 923 91 1,014


Total 104,459 135,667 91% 9% 83%


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Schools in need of improvement 0 0 0



Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1993-94 2000-01 — — —


6% 11%


1994 2000 Students with limited


English 83% 86% English proficiency (ED/NCBE)


Math 76 67 Title I allocation $448,602,730


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○


Science 52 69 All schools by percent of students eligible to (Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start,


Social Studies 86 96 participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch


Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)
Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)




NAEP State Results


Sources of funding 0-34% 1,180


District average


Grade 4 Grade 8


(CCD, 2000-01)
State 35-49% 564 Reading, 2003


Federal
Proficient level and above 32% 26%


9% 49%


50-74% 929 Basic level and above 63 67



Local

42% Math, 2003


75-100% 629 31% 23%


Proficient level and above


Basic level and above 76 61


^ 12 schools did not report.


KEY: * = Less than 0.5 percent


KEY: — = Not applicable


KEY: n/a = Not available
30 # = Sample size too small to calculate
Florida
Assessment Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test.
Student Achievement 2001-02
State Definition of Proficient See Appendix A.


Elementary School Middle School High School




Grade 4


Grade 8


Grade 10

○○


Reading Reading Reading

○○


○○


Proficient 0 Proficient 0 Proficient 0

○○


Students in: Students in: Students in:

○○
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5


○○


All Schools 30% 15% 28% 21% 6% All Schools 29% 26% 28% 14% 3% All Schools 32% 33% 21% 8% 7%

○○


Title I Schools Title I Schools Title I Schools

○○


○○
Economically Economically Economically


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○


Disadvantaged Students Disadvantaged Students Disadvantaged Students



Students with Limited Students with Limited Students with Limited


English Proficiency English Proficiency English Proficiency


Migratory Students


Migratory Students Migratory Students


Students with Disabilities Students with Disabilities Students with Disabilities



Grade 4 Grade 8 Grade 10


Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics



Proficient 0 Proficient 0 Proficient 0



Students in: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Students in: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Students in: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5


All Schools 26% 24% 32% 15% 4% All Schools 25% 22% 31% 14% 8% All Schools 19% 21% 25% 27% 8%



Title I Schools Title I Schools Title I Schools


Economically Economically Economically


Disadvantaged Students Disadvantaged Students Disadvantaged Students




Students with Limited Students with Limited Students with Limited


English Proficiency English Proficiency English Proficiency


Migratory Students Migratory Students Migratory Students



Students with Disabilities Students with Disabilities Students with Disabilities




High School Indicators




High school 1993-94 2000-01



dropout rate (CCD, event) n/a 4%


1994-95 2000-01

Postsecondary enrollment 49% 56%



(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)


KEY: * = Less than 0.5 percent


— = Not applicable
n/a = Not available
# = Sample size too few to calculate
High Poverty Schools = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies F O R M O R E I N F O R M A T I O N , R E F E R T O S O U R C E S , P A G E 1 1 7 31

Вам также может понравиться