Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
networks. Various designs will be overviewed with particular emphasis on the widely tunable (>32nm) types.
Larry A. Coldren
University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
coldren@ece.ucsb.edu
Contents
Why Tunable Lasers? Basic Tuning Mechanisms Examples of Tunable Lasers Control of the Wavelength Reliability Issues
Core
Edge
Introduction
One time provisioninginventory and sparing Field re-provisioningnew services without hardware change or truck roll Reconfigurable Optical Add/Drop Multiplexers (ROADM) Drop and add any channel without demux/mux Wavelength conversionEliminates wavelength blocking without OEO line cards Photonic SwitchingEliminates many OEO line cards Wavelength RoutingUse passive optical core
Laser is provisioned once only Simplifies manufacturing Drastically reduces inventory Minimizes sparing to a manageable level Simplifies forecasting
Applications Re-provisioning
in
thru
out
drop Rx
add
Tunable Tx
Drop and Add without Demux and Mux of all channels Must be hitless filter tuning Eliminates mux/demux and OEO Tunable lasers are a key enabler
OR
Rx Tx
4 5 6
Tunable
Photonic switches require O-E-O on I/O to prevent blocking Tunability reduces O-E-O requirements in half Requires moderately fast switching (ms)
10
in optical domain
Node 3B
Node 4B
Node 4R
Node 3R
Node 2B
Node 1B
Node 1R
Node 2R
Rx Tx
11
Line cards
High capacity, high density router functionneed wide tuning Wavelength used to route traffic through passive device For Packets requires very fast switching
12
Contents
Why Tunable Lasers? Basic Tuning Mechanisms Examples of Tunable Lasers Control of the Wavelength Reliability Issues
13
Mirror-2
m/2 = nL
Possible modes
14
DFB
All-elements combined and distributed along length
AR
DBR
Elements separated with individual biases
External Cavity
Gain block + external lens & grating
Collimating lens
VCSEL
Short cavity for mode selection
Light Out
15
m/2 = nL
Mode number Wavelength
Effective index
16
m/2 = nL
Gain Mode-selection filter (m) Lasing mode Possible modes(n, L)
17
DBR Lasers
Conventional DBR (<8 nm) Extended Tuning DBRs ( 32 nm)
W in d o w
8 M ic r o a r r a y D F B -L D s S -b e n t w a v e g u id e s
C h ip s iz e : 0 .4 x 2 .1 5 m m
18
Contents
Why Tunable Lasers? Basic Tuning Mechanisms Examples of Tunable Lasers Control of the Wavelength Reliability Issues
19
Temperature tuned DFBs ~ 3nm Narrowly tunable 2 or 3 section DBR lasers ~ 8nm Select DFB array element for coarse tuning + temperature tune for fine cavity mode tuning Integrated on-chip combiners + SOAs or off-chip MEMs deflectors External grating reflector for mode-selection filter Angle-tune mirror for mode selectioncoarse tuning Change length and/or phase section for fine tuning Move suspended top mirror by electrostatic or thermal tuning Single knob tuning for both coarse and fine Coarse tuning by index tuning of compound mirrors/couplers Fine tuning by index tuning of phase section Dual SGDBR or vertical-coupler + SGDBR mode selection filters
External-cavity lasers
20
Feature DFB-LD-array-based structure Wide-band tunability Compact & stable Multi- locker module Performance WSLs for S-, C-, L- bands (OFC02) Multi -locker integrated Wide-band WSL module (OFC02)
~ 40 nm (T = 45K)
8 array, ~ 16 nm (T = 25K) x 6 devices
MMI Window SOA 8 Microarray DFB-LDs S-bent waveguides
21
22
0.5 1.8 mm
23
Temperature tuning
Spectra at 32 wavelengths
24
12 element DFB array, each temperature tuned 3nm for 36nm total tuning range only one laser on at a time MEMS mirror couples the selected laser to fiber Advantages: DFB characteristics (optical quality, reliability, wavelength stability) No SOA, tuning sections, phase-sensitive mechanics High yield, low cost passive alignment (MEMS does the rest) Built-in shutter/VOA
25
z z z z z
Full band tunability (36nm C-band, 42nm L-band) Built-in wavelength locker (25GHz channel spacing) >50dB SMSR, 2MHz linewidth Typical tuning time ~ 2sec Resistant to shock and vibe with no servo (10G causes < 0.2dB fluctuation in power)
26
27
AR Coating
Retroreflector
Diffraction Grating
28
29
Advantages:
High Power Wide Tuning Range Continuously Tunable
30
31
Gain
Tuning
EA Modulator
Gain Section
DBR Mirror
Optical Amplifier
Modulator
32
33
Gain 400m
30 25 20 15 10 5 0
8 7 C o u p le rc u rre n t [m A ] 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1515 1525 1535 1545 1555 1565
1515 1525 1535 1545 1555 1565
900m
Wavelength [nm]
35
24 1
Light Out
5-10X Tuning Range of DBR Reliable, Manufacturable InP Technology Can Cover C band, L band or C + L
Mirror Reflectivity
0 .8 0 .6 0 .4 0 .2 0
1530
1570
36
Light Out
EA Modulator
SOA
SG-DBR Laser
Advantages: smaller space (fewer packages) lower cost (fewer package components) lower power consumption (lower coupling losses) high reliability (fewer parts)
37
Switching time = 10 ns
80
Light Power
Channel 50 off
Count
Channel 50 on
60
40
Light Power
20
Time (ns)
0 0
10
SwitchingTime (ns)
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Current source rise time can be designed for application. Inherent laser limit is in ~ 2-10 ns range. Thermal transients can complicate rapid switching.
38
13dBm
L-band
>100 50 GHz ITU Channels Fiber coupled power = 13dBm = 20mW SMSR > 40 dB SOA: Power leveling, blanking, and VOA w/o degradation of SMSR Channel switching time (software commandverified channel) < 10 ms
39
4 Linewidth (MHz)
11 3 10 2 9 1
RIN (dB/Hz)
-140
-145
7 0 1525 1530 1535 1540 1545 1550 1555 1560 1565 Wavelength (nm)
RIN is only weakly dependent on output power (SOA current). Linewidth is less than 2.5 MHz across all wavelengths
Scales with Laser Power as expected.
40
1528 nm
1560 nm
Dispersion Penalty @ 10
-10
2 1
275 km
PRBS 231-1 at 2.5 Gb/s 4th order BesselThomson filter SONET mask with 25% margin
200 km
0 1.53 1.54 1.55 1.56 1.57
1550 nm
Wavelength, m
Dispersion penalty at 10-10 errors/s error rate for 200, 275, and 350 km of standard SMF for 38 ITU channels sampled across C-band.
41
3 dBm
RF Extinction Ratio (dB)
~1550 nm
5.5
2 dB
0 dB
192
193
194
195
196
Ave. power >5 dBm and RF ER > 10 dB across C-band Output power dynamic range of ~10 dB w/ small change in SMSR and Wavelength (open loop operation)
-3 dB
42
Integration technology compatible with higher bit rates > 10 dB RF ER across C-band Not optimized, improvements to come
43
MZ-SGDBR (UCSB)
Curved waveguides 200m
44
Chirp Parameter
-15
-2 -20 -4 -25 -6
chirp =
2 L
-30
-35
45
Normalized S21
-2 -4 -6 -8
BCB
-4V Bias
0 5 10 15 Frequency (GHz) 20
46
Contents
Why Tunable Lasers? Basic Tuning Mechanisms Examples of Tunable Lasers Control of the Wavelength Reliability Issues
47
Control Issues
48
m/2 = nL
Gain Mode-selection filter (m) Lasing mode Possible modes(n, L)
49
Amplitude
Igain(j) Igain(j) ISOA Igain Igain
VOA
ISOA VM1, VM2(j) ISOA VMshutter
--------
DFB Array/SOA Varray(j) DFBs/MEMs VM1, VM2(j) SGDBR/SOA Ext. Cavity VCSEL/MEMs Im1, Im2 VM VM1
50
51
DWDM DBR
Power Control Temperature Control(fixed) Wavelength Locking Mirror Control (Locking?) Light Out
SG-DBR
SOA Front Mirror Gain Phase Rear Mirror
52
Contents
Why Tunable Lasers? Basic Tuning Mechanisms Examples of Tunable Lasers Control of the Wavelength Reliability Issues
53
Wavelength Reliability
Its not enough to just put out the right power in a single mode for a long time (old criterion) Prior to end-of-life of a multi-channel DWDM source, power & wavelength must be in spec. Intimately linked to wavelength control (or lack of it)
Look-up tables vs. channel counting? Is global wavelength monitor required? Must look-up tables be updated over life? Is locker required to meet spec? Is single knob control from locker sufficient over life?
54
Physical Causes, assuming a fixed look-up table: n Changes in internal temperature, Tint, or carrier lifetime, c L Physical movementssolder relaxation, MEMs charging m n of DBR, of ext. grating, or MEMs charging
55
Variables in Table
j, Ig(j), T, ISOA j, Ig(j), T, VM1(j), VM2(j) Im1, Im2, I, ISOA VM, VML, I, Igain, VMshut
*Critical issues
n(Tint) Ig n(Tint) Ig nDBR(c) m L(VM), m(VM), n(Tint) Ig L(VM)
VCSEL/MEMs
VM1, Ig
56
VCSEL/MEMs
1000GHz
Only SGDBR lands on correct mode near EOL Open-loop Others require global channel monitor or the like
57
6.5
0.08
0.07
5.5
0.06
4.5 rtBM
0.05
240 Hours 576 Hours 1080 Hours 1416 Hours 2088 Hours 2304 Hours 2640 Hours
3.5
0.04
2.5
0.03
0.02
1.5
0.01
0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5 rtFM t=96 Hours t=2304 Hours 3.5 4.5 5.5
0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Corresponds to > 100 yrs of operation Aging gives fixed amount of root current increase to provide a shift in the mode map to higher current .
58
104
MTTF ~ ~ 350yrs MTTF 350 yrs ~0.56 0.56 Ea=0.55 eV, n=2
~ 106 Device Hours measured. Very low Bragg Wavelength Aging Rates < 0.5 pm/ year at worse case. Gain and SOA sections have similar MTTF and failure distribution. OK for open-loop operation no mode hops or incorrect channels
103
102
101
0.1 1 5 20 50
80
95
99 99.9
Cumulative Failures, %
59
200
Gain section determines EOL Closed-loop mirror control has also been implemented to monitor any drift
150
100
50
60
Historically, DBR Reliability WAS Poor Defects in the grating area, found to be primary cause of DBR failure. Improvement to re-growth (InP/InP) and minimal grating area of SG-DBR, allow equivalent or better performance vs. DFBs.
DFB EOL
*Mawatari, 1999
Agility, 2002
100
*Mawatari et al, Lasing Wavelength Changes Due to Degradation in Buried Heterostructure DBR Laser, Journal of Lightwave Technology, v.17, no.5 1999
61
Summary
Tunable lasers can reduce operational costs Narrowly tunable versions have some short term inventory/sparing cost advantages but newer full-band types offer many further opportunities Several configurations have emerged for current applications Monolithic integration offers significant potential for reducing size, weight, power, & cost Wavelength control issues still exist for many configurations. Look-up table updating and/or global channel monitors are necessary in some cases. Reliability has been proven for the SGDBR version without any updating of the look-up tables or need for channel searching